Consider that perhaps the political decision makers, Putin included are useful as being instrumental in the Russian military doing so badly. As for this guy reiterating Putin's threats to use nuclear weapons. He should think through the consequences of such an action. The very spot he is standing in, if it is in Moscow may be lost in a layer of ashes.
But they are Ukrainians former commies and not Brits or even Americans. Moreover they are killing other former commies Russians. Win-win situation. Unless the WWIII starts, then it's all was for nothing. And that's why NATO has not to overstep helping Ukraine.
@@stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733 conventional missile are NOT the same as nuclear missiles. Poo-tin knows exactly what would happen if they did that - he wouldn't survive the experience.
Completely wrong. It's the greedy corrupt politicians that you vote for, like an idiot, that send young people to die in their wars so they can have more power and wealth.
The people of Ukraine remember what it's like being ruled from the Kremlin. That's why they're fighting - because they'd rather die than let that happen again. If you understood the history of what they went through - the genocides, the forced deportations, the starvation in the midst of plenty, and the forced colonisation with ethnic Russians after so many Ukrainian citizens had been murdered - you'd probably understand why they are fighting. You also might understand why the Baltic states that were treated the same way are some of their most eager supporters. The Baltic people remember being ruled from the Kremlin too. They will fight to the death to make sure that never happens to their countries again too.
When world leaders say peace, then comes destruction, there is no desire for peace only control, the voters seem bent on giving politicians who have global ambitions their vote
@@ridgerunner106 Its really a sign of desperation from the British Elite. It is imperative they maintain the fictions: that Ukraine is winning a just war; that didnt start because of Ukraine aggression against its ethnic Russian citizens; and that this war of attrition is being completely controlled by Russia, without Russia resorting to Total War (Shock n Awe US-Style); Britain desperately wants to be the US wing-man. They talk tough, but the reality is Britain could not enter and occupy IRELAND for even 3 months with its current numbers of troops and its current weapons inventory... The Sun set long ago on Britains days of glory, and for that reason, institutions like the Times put interviewers like this, supposedly asking tough questions, but are really just hoping the Ox-Bridge tones and condescending language will fool people. The reality is it fools no-one, least of all Russia...
Man is saying that problem is not that Ukraine attacks, the problem is that to use this large distance British and US rockets need to use British and US satellite systems, that means that will be not Ukrainian who is launching them
Probably best for us all to write to UK political leaders and beg them to STOP provoking yet more wars around the world and to stop dragging us in. (I won't...I'd rather become an expat if it really comes down to it.)
@@Firehawk95 he could have found someone else to counter that point. Its not his job to call it out. Reporters are supposed to be neutral. Its interesting how US propaganda is spewed all over the world and nobody blinks an eye, but when its from someone not aligned with the US, then its a huge deal. Calling out propaganda is a good thing, but it should be called out from EVERY source, not just from those not aligned with the US.
@@denisrichard58 That is wrong, it is a reporter's job to get at the truth and to challenge lies. You are thinking of Russian media, which is just serving to spread propaganda. Reporters in the west are not bound to repeat any lie the state tells them.
@@denisrichard58 Yes its exactly the job of a journalist to confront and challenge interviewes. That you, obviously a fan of authoritarianism, dont understand this, comes top no surprise when we look at how russians deal with journalists who do their job.
I totally agree with you Micheal. I have always maintained that if anybody was going to use Nuclear Weapons first it would be Mr Putin. He has been quoted as saying that Nuclear Weapons were made to be used.
We need to hold our nerve. If we succumb to his continual and nonsense nuclear threats, we may just as well scrap our military and give up. This is the 5th or 6th red line he has drawn, and it should be walked through just like the others.
If the NATO countries, and Ukraine of course, had been serious about the Minsk accords, instead of using it to buy time to build up Ukraine's army, there would have been no war at all.
because we have not. We granted them independence since Serbs were offing children like on a track (normal for them). If we took Kosovo and gave it Albania then you could complain because that would be increasing territory at the expense of a another country like Russia is doing or did you forget Putin took those lands by declaration. It would be like NATO coming to Serbia and telling you to give Vojvodina to Croatia
@@Dujma12 However, that was precisely NATO's plan: to annex Kosovo to Albania in order to achieve a geopolitical realignment. What they had not anticipated, though, was that Albania had no interest in such a territorial expansion. On the contrary, Albania rejected the idea, as it would not only bring additional burdens but also potential internal tensions.
I agree, so biased instead of listening to understand arguments on all sides and present moral facts of the issues to the public. They decide what to report then go out and challenge the issue
@@alainbileg9826 That's not the point. The point is that the journalist said "our perspective is X, now what is your perspective?". Markov started to explain the Russian perspective and the journalist kept interrupting him, not allowing him to make the case. You can agree with Markov or not but if you're going to interview him then let him speak. If you disagree with him then you can make your case after he's done speaking. But don't keep interrupting him.
I'm just a Texan who likes to fish. Why can't this country just keep outta other country's business? This country has enough problems to solve (border #1) without having to stick their nose in everyone's business. I miss Dr. Ron Paul....
Hello from Florida, Texan! I agree; us messing around in other countries is the cause of so many of our problems, including the border. Actively working to destroy the economy of Venezuela for Big Oil interests is just one example. Anyway, in the words of my dad before every fishing attempt: "May Great Neptune, Keeper of the Big Ones smile kindly upon us!"
I love texas, but the west started this by trying to drag in ukraine in nato when it was very clearly agrees upon that they shoyld not and thus ruined the neutral bufferzone of neutral ground between the west and former soviet states. To have a neuteal bufferzone have served us well and have helped cool off and take pressure of otherwise strained relations. The west deployed various NGOs in ukraine that formented a state coupe and got a democratically elected leader to resign and flee the country. The funded and orchestrated riots and had professional provocateurs participate to drive up tensions and escalate the violence. Besides it's not like usa would be chill for 5 seconds if canada or mexico joined a russian military alliance. We all know you would put a stop to thay one way or another so.
@@abvmoose87 Amen, brother. The fact this is not completely obvious to the general public is alarming. My own cousin accused me of "rootin' for Putin" when I suggested over a year ago that there should be peace negotiations. Propaganda is effective!
@@cranebeg No it's not bonkers. The reality is that if Putin is allowed to win this war with Ukraine, then he will be emboldened to repeat the process with another country, maybe Poland or one of the other nearby countries. And if that succeeds, then where? Eventually Austria? Germany? France? The UK? If he's daft enough to start lobbing nuclear weapons over the fence, then Russia will end up being annihilated and he knows that. As long as the war was out of sight from the general population, most just shrugged their shoulders and thought "nothing to do with me". But now that Ukraine is finding ways to move the action onto Russian soil, people are suddenly realising that they might be blown up too and naturally, they're starting to get frightened. So suddenly reality is dawning on the Russian population. Their young men are returning in body bags or not returning at all, the economy is declining, they can't get hold of their favourite western products and now there's a possibility of a load of TNT falling out of the sky on top of them. And what have they got in return? Nothing. Yeah, I doubt whether Putin is too popular at the moment. He's in a dilemma. He can't back down because the whole of Russia would blame him for a pointless war, but neither can he win outright. The only way this war is going to be stopped is if he is removed from power by the oligarchs in Moscow and for that to happen, they need to feel more than just pressure from western sanctions. If I were Putin, I'd stay well clear of any open third floor windows.
My father used to say that the West always wanted a conventional war with the USSR. He told me about the death camps in Ukraine and how many Jews the Ukrainian SS killed in World War II. But you never hear about that stuff.
Back then Ukraine was part of the USSR. Ukraine left the USSR and became it's own country. Sometimes things can change for the best. We have to be smart enough to learn from history and not continue to harbor unless vengeance to continue on the same path.
Well, when russians attack with rockets from Iran and North Corea it's ok but with StormShadows and Atacms from Ukraine to russians territory not ? Russia ist afraid of western technlogy so they threath with nukes.
Yeah. Did he tell you about how Ukrainians voted for a Jewish president? Or how the camps in Ukrainw that you speak of were run by Germans, who ki11ed 1 in 5 of the entiee population of Ukraine? Or how Moscow starved 1 in 5 Ukrainians to de4th a decade earlier? Or how the USSR openly aimed to overthrow Western democracies throughout its existence?
What about all the countries supporting Russia. So many countries are supporting Ukraine perhaps in part because many are in NATO, and in part because of seeing war crimes against Ukrainians due to Russia's 'special military operation'.
It’s truly fascinating people are ignoring his message but rather castigating his English despite understanding his message which is a dangerous one for us in the UK
The real issue is that this is the 5th red line he has drawn, the other 4 having been walked over. He has lost all credibility. We should get on and jump across this one immediately. Who cares about his English language, let alone the nonsense he spouts with it.
@@himiehonor1196 LOL! We are just supplying the tools. I am British, not Ukrainian. I doubt I will need to go anywhere, because Putin will not touch NATO.
@@simonjess8471 That's where you are not right, we are not just supplying, we are in fact selecting targets, firing and then guiding the missile to the target using our space assets. This effectively is us directly shooting at Russia so I don't think you will be sitting so comfortably if this carries on wherever you are in Blighty. We do not need to be thick about the truth when our lives depend on the facts!
It's one of those journalist balance things. Just like the BBC used to have a policy that every time they discussed climate change with a real scientist, they had to also talk to some wingnut who denied it, even when their basis for that belief was holy scripture, what they'd read on Facebook or mere wishful thinking.
YOU PEOPLE ARE MISSING THE POINT !!!! The targeting of russian cities is supplied by the usa and uk !!!!!! Ukrain is not doing it by themselves !!!!! Thats the difference. Iran is just selling russia with arms NOT helping them target ukrain !!!
At least it will make all our existing problems (NHS, debt, immigration, housing, energy, infrastructure, pollution, flooding, net-zero etc.) seem tiny in comparison!
@@imirish4702 NATO didn’t fight in Vietnam just the US and Koreans. Afghanistan was a coalition. If you are going to try to be witty at least get your facts right.
I am not clear. What was said about poland? A polish official said to secretary of state blinken that he does not want polish people dying for this usa war that usa is fighting with Russia
He is correct Ukraine doesn't have targeting equipment. It will be British and US using their systems and actually doung the targeting. This puts it in a whole other game.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said: "America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe. Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break. Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone. Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
The real issue is NATO expansion in Europe, as US wanted to maintain its hegemony, and world police behaviour. This has to be resolute for the world to be in peace!!!!
The question you need to ask is why Russia is so against the nato allies, I’ll tell you why because Russia is an dictatorship and it has brainwashed it’s citizens
Times radio did the clever thing letting this guy talk. He is the voice of Russian unreason. Now we know for sure what they think. Soon, hopefully, they’ll hear what we think.
“We”? Please speak only for yourself. I’m with Candace Owens on this: F*** Ukraine. Why you want us to go to war is beyond me, except that you’re either a Zionist or an old-style Jingoist. What have “WE” to gain? Right: zilch.
I urge you to open a search engine and research what energy does Russia produce and where do they exsport I'll start you off by telling you that Russia exports 50 percent of there gas exports to Europe plz look this up for yourself and BP has a huge portfolio of oil fields I would if I was putin stop the 50 percent of the gas exports to Europe and exspell BP and conferscate the assets in Russia emidatley thats for starters I'm not going too say anything else but you should look this up
and if America weakens Russia the way it wants to, the way Iraq and Libya were, what happens then? Well, we know; mass immigration like you wouldn't believe, a free run on drug shipments, another rash of Russian arms falling into criminal hands the way they did after the USSR broke up, diseases reemerging as health care fails, The Americans tend to go in somewhere, overthrow governments who don't follow the line and then when they get fed up just walk away. And before anyone starts in on how dangerous Libya and Iraq's regimes were, just look at Sudan and Haiti at the moment, how dangerous are they being run by warlords and criminal gangs? But no-one is going in there and 'cleaning up". Ah, no oil, of course. There we have it, petrochemicals.
I honestly don't know what to say. So much ignorance and propaganda from both sides tbh. I'm extremely glad that some of the armchair generals in the comment section aren't in command. There is a reason that the west has been very cautious (wisely so) with regards to their decisions on what to give or not to Ukraine. There is no winner in nuclear war. And at some point if you keep calling someone's bluff, then you are totally reliant on them backing... or not. One he'll of a gamble. Get it right and you can say I told you so, get it wrong and there will be nobody left to tell you I told you so.
Come on. You think England cannot survive a few hundred nuclear weapon explosions? I'm being facetious of course. Russia has 6,500 nuclear weapons. Many of them twice the size of the USA. With probably less than 20 strategically placed attacks all of the entire country of Great Britain would for the most part cease to exist. Yet, our great leaders want to play games and boisterous behavior as though it were a game. So sad complete fools have been in charge of western nations now for over twenty years.
What i don't understand is why this new reporter thinks that Ukraine is winning this war when every western independent military expert says that Russia is winning and that Ukraine can not possibly win. Like this Russian says to loose to Ukraine would allow them to join Nato which would see US missiles placed along it's border which is considered an existential threat by Russia and therefore would deploy a preemptive nuclear strike first in Europe and the the US.
The Americans did Not want Russian missiles in Cuba …. So Why do they think it’s ok to line them up in Ukraine facing the Russian border ? Disgusting warmongering hypocrisy…
Because people listen not to speacialist but mainstream media and they need their portion of excrements, otherwise poisoned food from fast food or media cabaret.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said: "America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe. Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break. Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone. Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
what an ignorant comment. Have you been watching ? russia has refused peace time and time again. Why dont all you half witted ignorand idealists use a bit of common sense and start adressing the cause of the problem, which is russia and nobody else. russia needs to leave of its own accord or be forced out, that is the only 2 choices which are acceptable to decency.
@@coltonconner782 So, don't feed a movement founded on Stepan Bandera's vision! Don't go to Ukraine to overthrow an elected government with a coup d'état, don't go to Ukraine to implement a fascist regime, don't plant NATO structures in Ukraine and don't start persecuting ethnic Russian people with NATO weapons. I just wonder what would have happened if the fascist coup government in Ukraine had actually complied with the Minsk agreements!? The Russians were there quietly in their little corner, doing gas business with Germany and europe, the closest they were to America was in Alaska, but there is no memory of them ever posing a danger there. Anyway they are not getting close to "us", they are getting far far a way from "us" everytime more close to China... I don't know if you already start to get the result of that for "us".
I still don't understand all this rush to send billions and weapons to a nation like Ukraine, which meant nothing to Europe until yesterday. With the real risk of plunging us into an economic crisis if things go well, and into a nuclear war if things go badly...
This is because you yourself are not interested in what your country does on the UN councils. What intrigues is he building in other countries? Thousands of different NGOs that work hard in the name of the interests of England or your masters in the USA. Your country sponsors various oppositionists. Including sponsorship through NGOs and various foundations. You support anyone, even a damn bald one, even a bloodthirsty dictator, as long as he is against those who are inconvenient for your country. You have not even read the main strategic interests of your country from open military sources. You probably haven’t heard anything about such goals of British intelligence as the Greater Caucasus project under the protectorate of England (we already call it small/dwarfyBritain, as opposed to Great Britain, which does not exist and will never exist again) Circassia project. Or the British projects regarding their favorite tame hyena - Poland (it was not I who called it that, but your Churchill). It's just that now your tame hyena is feeding from the hands of its new owner - Uncle Sam. This is a project for the union of the Baltic republics of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. Of course, under the protectorate of the main international criminal - the United States and its tame clowns from NATO. You understand that England, far from the Black Sea, indicates its sphere of interest and desire for presence in the Black Sea and the Caucasus. Imagine if China wrote in some official document that until the year 40, their sphere of interest was Scotland and its separation from England. Isn't this an act of war?
@@yeleedkram But go where? If they keep using weapons, they're doomed. We’re not in a stadium cheering for a team. And in the meantime, they are the ones dying while we sit behind our keyboards. And the tension keeps rising…
@crookedSkwe - if you knew a thing about anything you would know that the Ukrainian people did not want anything to do with US/NATO coup 2014 - so they are ‘liberating’ those people. They will know that the more Beglensky ‘invades’ Russia the more danger they are it. You are a ‘victim’ of US/NATO propaganda. 🤡
@@theboraxbandit9563 Not a helpful comment without discussing what mean when you state consequences. What about future generations of children in Europe including the UK and their children? If this not dealt with now and in the Ukraine it may very well spill over and the UK is not exactly a bastion of strength between it's challenges with reeling from Brexit, immigration and the pandemic. Oh, but I've made your point I hear you say but I say that you are not thinking long term. You can kick the can down the road but when it comes to war, dealing with that sooner rather than later is best, especially if you don't have to fight in it.
@@CrookedSkew Could you define spilling over please? it's those very same reasons you mentioned that I wish this war would end now. Ukraine was always on the table. Putin isn't going to decide "ooo let's have Poland next"
What is delusional is gambling with millions of lives to help out Ukraine. NATO were warned, it seems they followed up on that warning. They were not bluffing like you think they are.
Delusion has nearly religious levels in Russia. Decades of exposure to propaganda can do that to you. Reminds of of North Korean soldiers who escaped - they truly believed they could take on the USA.
Switzerland is not a member of NATO. It has never joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. However, the Swiss Armed Forces are participating in the international peace support mission of the Kosovo Force (KFOR) in Kosovo. Obviously Russia does not want Ukraine to join the European Union or NATO.
No Nukes will be excahanged . But if the f UK keeps prodding the Russian Bear with this silent high tech missle support for Ukraine without formal US approval then expect serious silent Russsian miltary assistance for Argentna in a potential future Falklands conflict. .
@@josephhenry9924 Russia won't be in a position to help itself soon never mind Argentina , Russia is just realising that the longer this goes on they have no hope of winning
Completely agree with you Russia need to seize European assets in Russia emidatley and stop exporting 50 percent of Europe's gas as well as you say what good for the goose is good for the gander
To be fair, humans only say humans are more intelligent than other species because they speak human languages (And can't even understand most of them) the bar was never that high for intelligence it seems.
An independent nation is free to make treaties with other nations and groups as it sees fit. This means and independent nation can join NATO, and nobody who isn't part of NATO has any say in the matter.
Интересно сейчас Украина очень независимая?😂 и что именно у них независимое на данный момент😅? Тоже можно сказать и обо всей Европе которая действует не в своих интересах а в интересах США
Кстати почему просроченный президент не проводит выборы? Я так подозреваю не смотря на войну в большинстве регионов у них протекает мирная жизнь как и в России 😊😊
@@tealkerberus748 "This means and independent nation can join NATO" - then Cuba as an independent nation can form a military alliance with Russia and have russian nuclear missiles.
The question if Ukraine will be in NATO..... This guy missed the memo, the whole problem started from that. I can answer you that Ukraine will never be a NATO state., they risk to don't be a state at all. Don't you see?
Russia attacked the military infrastructure in Ukraine because the Ukrainians stupidly joined with the duplicitous, insanely aggressive Pentagon to establish biological weapons facilities in their country. No worthy leader of ANY country would allow its neighbor to establish threatening weapons facilities. President Putin has been remarkably patient and calm, and there would have been a just peace in April 2022 if the U.S. (sending the lying POS Boris Johnson) hadn't interfered in the peace process.
It's a good thing the UK didn't decommission it's Trident nuclear submarines (like Peter Hitchens among others recommended). If it had these threats would hit a lot harder.
They barely hit as is. Russia can barely even capture a few back gardens in Ukraine. If they want to start throwing missiles about at NATO then it'll only accelerate the collapse of Russia completely.
The thing is NATO can't exist when Russia is apart of it because Russia has always been the reason for NATO existence and for spending trillion of $ a year on weapons
@@lawrence1318 Not just that but Russia as a world power would have a say in NATO unlike every other country that is in NATO currently, just USA marionetes doing their bidding. Thats why they were refused, also Russia being in NATO would prevent all these wars as well , speaks volume on who here is interested in bringing war into the world doesn't it.
Any mouthpiece of the Putin regime will _constantly_ lie. Anyone working for Putin is amoral, and they simply have no concept of the truth; they'll say whatever seems to best serve the interests of their ruler, their empire and - most importantly - their bank accounts.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said: "America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe. Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break. Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone. Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said: "America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe. Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break. Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone. Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said: "America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe. Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break. Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone. Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
@dato - Yeah just ignore it big shot - Russia is bound to be quaking in its boots now that Starmers the Pensioner murderer has entered the arena. You seem to have plenty of money for Ukraine and immigrants. Do you dream the NATO countries Germany, Holland, Turkey, Hungry are going to allow the use of Nuclear weapons on their doorstep? You are on your own England. Bye Bye
In the old days the protagonists led their armies into battle on a battlefield... Today they cower under their beds and send the flowers of their youth to die....
I propose that the ruling class be sent to the front-line.
Especially the POLITICIANS.
I second that motion
Consider that perhaps the political decision makers, Putin included are useful as being instrumental in the Russian military doing so badly.
As for this guy reiterating Putin's threats to use nuclear weapons. He should think through the consequences of such an action.
The very spot he is standing in, if it is in Moscow may be lost in a layer of ashes.
@@rustykilt they are part of the ruling class
@@yowie69 point taken.
These clowns have thrown almost 600,000 young people to injury or death....
But they are Ukrainians former commies and not Brits or even Americans. Moreover they are killing other former commies Russians. Win-win situation. Unless the WWIII starts, then it's all was for nothing. And that's why NATO has not to overstep helping Ukraine.
By the way, do you happen to know the names of the clowns who organised a bloody unconstitutional coup de etat in Ukraine in 2014 ?
All by design. There will be many "war brides" available to the next occupiers, and the next occupiers won't be Russians. Work it out for yourself.
And now they want to put all of us in danger
Funny how 600, 000 take out the wrong enemy.
You cant attack a nation and not expect them to strike back... its a two way street.
If Russia supplied Iran with a nuke and said you can New York with it..
What do you think the response would be?
@@momentumstocks3493 same as if England gives Ukraine missiles to hit Russia.
Exacly, You attack Iraq and Afganistan, bomb Siria, Libia and think they will not bomb London?!!
@@stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733 conventional missile are NOT the same as nuclear missiles.
Poo-tin knows exactly what would happen if they did that - he wouldn't survive the experience.
Ukraine srarted attacking Russians in 2014 pal.
It is the old people that start war while it is the young people that fight and die!
It's the people running the world who are responsible your comment is ageist one day you will be old
least it will stop them suing their pathetic smart phones
Completely wrong. It's the greedy corrupt politicians that you vote for, like an idiot, that send young people to die in their wars so they can have more power and wealth.
Peace and love everyone. Stop these wars that our leaders want not the people. ❤
The people of Ukraine remember what it's like being ruled from the Kremlin. That's why they're fighting - because they'd rather die than let that happen again.
If you understood the history of what they went through - the genocides, the forced deportations, the starvation in the midst of plenty, and the forced colonisation with ethnic Russians after so many Ukrainian citizens had been murdered - you'd probably understand why they are fighting.
You also might understand why the Baltic states that were treated the same way are some of their most eager supporters. The Baltic people remember being ruled from the Kremlin too. They will fight to the death to make sure that never happens to their countries again too.
some of the people want them, brainwashed
When world leaders say peace, then comes destruction, there is no desire for peace only control, the voters seem bent on giving politicians who have global ambitions their vote
@@moriscondo5511 BS
How about, go back to whatever pointless drivel it is you live for?
You ask a question, let the man speak.
Appalling manners. A child would be put outside the room for such behaviour.
Yeah, I just love it when they talk over the guest.
@@ridgerunner106
Its really a sign of desperation from the British Elite.
It is imperative they maintain the fictions:
that Ukraine is winning a just war;
that didnt start because of Ukraine aggression against its ethnic Russian citizens;
and that this war of attrition is being completely controlled by Russia, without Russia resorting to Total War (Shock n Awe US-Style);
Britain desperately wants to be the US wing-man. They talk tough, but the reality is Britain could not enter and occupy IRELAND for even 3 months with its current numbers of troops and its current weapons inventory...
The Sun set long ago on Britains days of glory, and for that reason, institutions like the Times put interviewers like this, supposedly asking tough questions, but are really just hoping the Ox-Bridge tones and condescending language will fool people.
The reality is it fools no-one, least of all Russia...
They had no intention of letting him speak.
The guest is a village idiot
Man is saying that problem is not that Ukraine attacks, the problem is that to use this large distance British and US rockets need to use British and US satellite systems, that means that will be not Ukrainian who is launching them
Well man is wrong. Russians go home and everybody lives in peace.
And given that Russia is sourcing weapons from its allies, Russia is using it solely for its SMO and not to attack U.S., U.K.,NATO.
"British satellite systems"? What are they? Where? Since when?🤣
Well said!
@@alexanderkovalyov5211 . It's called 'Skynet'- operated by Babcock International on behalf of the UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD).
Uk people don't want war... but peace. 😢😢
Probably best for us all to write to UK political leaders and beg them to STOP provoking yet more wars around the world and to stop dragging us in. (I won't...I'd rather become an expat if it really comes down to it.)
Journalists are supposed to ask questions and wait for answers, not give their own opinion.
They are trying to get questions answered, not just give a free platform for this guy to spread Russian propaganda.
@@Firehawk95 he could have found someone else to counter that point. Its not his job to call it out. Reporters are supposed to be neutral.
Its interesting how US propaganda is spewed all over the world and nobody blinks an eye, but when its from someone not aligned with the US, then its a huge deal.
Calling out propaganda is a good thing, but it should be called out from EVERY source, not just from those not aligned with the US.
@@denisrichard58 That is wrong, it is a reporter's job to get at the truth and to challenge lies. You are thinking of Russian media, which is just serving to spread propaganda. Reporters in the west are not bound to repeat any lie the state tells them.
@@denisrichard58 Yes its exactly the job of a journalist to confront and challenge interviewes. That you, obviously a fan of authoritarianism, dont understand this, comes top no surprise when we look at how russians deal with journalists who do their job.
in west jopurnalçism they ask and they answer...
now more than ever we need statesmen instead of politicians.
Trump in jan will do the trick, look back at their previous meetings before you reply please.
Patriots needed.
I totally agree with you Micheal. I have always maintained that if anybody was going to use Nuclear Weapons first it would be Mr Putin. He has been quoted as saying that Nuclear Weapons were made to be used.
But surely you have the most respect for David Lammy........a titan amongst global politicians!
We need to hold our nerve. If we succumb to his continual and nonsense nuclear threats, we may just as well scrap our military and give up. This is the 5th or 6th red line he has drawn, and it should be walked through just like the others.
let s remember that war could have been finished 2 months after it started but boris johnson went and made a mess of all diplomacy
it was not a mess, it was his mission
Because America made him.
The war could not have started, about 2 years ago...
If the NATO countries, and Ukraine of course, had been serious about the Minsk accords, instead of using it to buy time to build up Ukraine's army, there would have been no war at all.
He wanted a war, that's the impression I got.
Remember the old phrase from the British Empire days, when you see 2 people fighting look for the Englishman in the background.
Absolutely right
humanity is set to Destroy itself 🙈Such a shame.
You have to much Faith in Colonialists.
Tell this to USA and UK
@@hmhm8007they dont listen!
yet poetic
Humanity, the only species on the planet with a negative value, about to end it's self. Good riddance.😢
Reminds me of when we “liberated” Kosovo from the sovereign country of Serbia. Our hypocrisy and double standards will be the death of us all.
Spot on. Remember what is their Freemasonic mantra? Build back better 😮🔥👿
Kosovo is liberated from ongoing Serbian genocide on Kosovo Albanians.
because we have not. We granted them independence since Serbs were offing children like on a track (normal for them). If we took Kosovo and gave it Albania then you could complain because that would be increasing territory at the expense of a another country like Russia is doing or did you forget Putin took those lands by declaration. It would be like NATO coming to Serbia and telling you to give Vojvodina to Croatia
@@Dujma12 However, that was precisely NATO's plan: to annex Kosovo to Albania in order to achieve a geopolitical realignment. What they had not anticipated, though, was that Albania had no interest in such a territorial expansion. On the contrary, Albania rejected the idea, as it would not only bring additional burdens but also potential internal tensions.
That's "us" Russian's for you.
Integrity in journalism is dead buried and gone from the west.RIP😢
Yea the interviewer was extremely rude and disrespectful. Not helping our chances of a peaceful resolution.
I agree, so biased instead of listening to understand arguments on all sides and present moral facts of the issues to the public. They decide what to report then go out and challenge the issue
Russia and China and others have then higher integrity and non-biased journalism?
Really, this journalist was too nice. Why do Russians think they are the only one with nuclear weapons. We are tired of that song.
@@alainbileg9826 That's not the point. The point is that the journalist said "our perspective is X, now what is your perspective?". Markov started to explain the Russian perspective and the journalist kept interrupting him, not allowing him to make the case. You can agree with Markov or not but if you're going to interview him then let him speak. If you disagree with him then you can make your case after he's done speaking. But don't keep interrupting him.
I'm just a Texan who likes to fish. Why can't this country just keep outta other country's business? This country has enough problems to solve (border #1) without having to stick their nose in everyone's business. I miss Dr. Ron Paul....
If Russia rules west Europe and the UK, the USA will collapse with zero trading partners.😊
Cuz they're making trillions of dollars. Are You still believing the U.S. is just trying to be good police of the world ?
Hello from Florida, Texan! I agree; us messing around in other countries is the cause of so many of our problems, including the border. Actively working to destroy the economy of Venezuela for Big Oil interests is just one example. Anyway, in the words of my dad before every fishing attempt: "May Great Neptune, Keeper of the Big Ones smile kindly upon us!"
I love texas, but the west started this by trying to drag in ukraine in nato when it was very clearly agrees upon that they shoyld not and thus ruined the neutral bufferzone of neutral ground between the west and former soviet states. To have a neuteal bufferzone have served us well and have helped cool off and take pressure of otherwise strained relations. The west deployed various NGOs in ukraine that formented a state coupe and got a democratically elected leader to resign and flee the country. The funded and orchestrated riots and had professional provocateurs participate to drive up tensions and escalate the violence. Besides it's not like usa would be chill for 5 seconds if canada or mexico joined a russian military alliance. We all know you would put a stop to thay one way or another so.
@@abvmoose87 Amen, brother. The fact this is not completely obvious to the general public is alarming. My own cousin accused me of "rootin' for Putin" when I suggested over a year ago that there should be peace negotiations. Propaganda is effective!
Why do we have Starmer and Lammy in Washington pleading to use Storm Shadow missiles knowing this could easily lead to nuclear exchange.
Russia won't use nukes
Exactly, it's bonkers!
@@cranebeg No it's not bonkers. The reality is that if Putin is allowed to win this war with Ukraine, then he will be emboldened to repeat the process with another country, maybe Poland or one of the other nearby countries. And if that succeeds, then where? Eventually Austria? Germany? France? The UK? If he's daft enough to start lobbing nuclear weapons over the fence, then Russia will end up being annihilated and he knows that. As long as the war was out of sight from the general population, most just shrugged their shoulders and thought "nothing to do with me". But now that Ukraine is finding ways to move the action onto Russian soil, people are suddenly realising that they might be blown up too and naturally, they're starting to get frightened. So suddenly reality is dawning on the Russian population. Their young men are returning in body bags or not returning at all, the economy is declining, they can't get hold of their favourite western products and now there's a possibility of a load of TNT falling out of the sky on top of them. And what have they got in return? Nothing. Yeah, I doubt whether Putin is too popular at the moment. He's in a dilemma. He can't back down because the whole of Russia would blame him for a pointless war, but neither can he win outright. The only way this war is going to be stopped is if he is removed from power by the oligarchs in Moscow and for that to happen, they need to feel more than just pressure from western sanctions. If I were Putin, I'd stay well clear of any open third floor windows.
Russia just needs to withdraw from Ukraine and all this will go away, not that hard to grasp is it??
@@paulbass2498 Putin can be forced out if he won't leave
This guys deserves to get his own comedy show.
Bagdad Bob 2
He is a clown from a circus. What is he doing on this channel?
He's got one, in Russia.
Comic Ali.
Hes well paid by Putin...
Bring it on our country needs a full reset,we are sick and tired of our leaders bending us over backwards
Simply stop recognizing their authority. it's all BS. They are Satanist devils.
Just remember not to give reach around
Who would fight for starmer idea of Britain?
@@wilsonsandviviennethevan.3090 lol you think I would fight for him no,I’ll fight for my family my friends that’s who I’ll fight for
Many people in GB feel the same way...
My father used to say that the West always wanted a conventional war with the USSR. He told me about the death camps in Ukraine and how many Jews the Ukrainian SS killed in World War II. But you never hear about that stuff.
Back then Ukraine was part of the USSR. Ukraine left the USSR and became it's own country. Sometimes things can change for the best. We have to be smart enough to learn from history and not continue to harbor unless vengeance to continue on the same path.
yawn
Soviet Russia, of which Ukraine was a part, and the German Nazis killed these Jews. The Soviets and the Germans were allies at the beginning of war.
Well, when russians attack with rockets from Iran and North Corea it's ok but with StormShadows and Atacms from Ukraine to russians territory not ? Russia ist afraid of western technlogy so they threath with nukes.
Yeah. Did he tell you about how Ukrainians voted for a Jewish president? Or how the camps in Ukrainw that you speak of were run by Germans, who ki11ed 1 in 5 of the entiee population of Ukraine? Or how Moscow starved 1 in 5 Ukrainians to de4th a decade earlier? Or how the USSR openly aimed to overthrow Western democracies throughout its existence?
If this war was between Russia and Ukraine then why 54 countries are involved against Russia....?
be careful, russia lover, China will ditch you soon.
What about all the countries supporting Russia. So many countries are supporting Ukraine perhaps in part because many are in NATO, and in part because of seeing war crimes against Ukrainians due to Russia's 'special military operation'.
@@Tanzin13 Why Ukraine was killing Russian ethnics in Ukraine since 2014
@@Tanzin13 Tarzan better go to Jungle, to play with Monkeys instead of commenting Politics
@@Tanzin13@Bethlehem76,,RUclips.. CBDC,,Digitale Identiteit.. Eindtijd kanaal.. Halleluja ❤
It’s truly fascinating people are ignoring his message but rather castigating his English despite understanding his message which is a dangerous one for us in the UK
The real issue is that this is the 5th red line he has drawn, the other 4 having been walked over. He has lost all credibility. We should get on and jump across this one immediately. Who cares about his English language, let alone the nonsense he spouts with it.
@@simonjess8471 That's a really good idea, what are you still doing online. Are you at the front yet?
@@himiehonor1196 LOL! We are just supplying the tools. I am British, not Ukrainian. I doubt I will need to go anywhere, because Putin will not touch NATO.
@@simonjess8471 That's where you are not right, we are not just supplying, we are in fact selecting targets, firing and then guiding the missile to the target using our space assets. This effectively is us directly shooting at Russia so I don't think you will be sitting so comfortably if this carries on wherever you are in Blighty. We do not need to be thick about the truth when our lives depend on the facts!
@@simonjess8471 Ok, let's!
where did you find this gem? 😅
It's one of those journalist balance things. Just like the BBC used to have a policy that every time they discussed climate change with a real scientist, they had to also talk to some wingnut who denied it, even when their basis for that belief was holy scripture, what they'd read on Facebook or mere wishful thinking.
Outside a mushroom farm, somewhere deep inside the land of alternate reality.
Should have got the compare the meercat 🦦to interview I would have taken more seriously
The Russians have a word for it... "Vranyo".
We know. That they know. That we know. They're lying. VRANYO
Somewhere deep in the toilette.
YOU PEOPLE ARE MISSING THE POINT !!!!
The targeting of russian cities is supplied by the usa and uk !!!!!!
Ukrain is not doing it by themselves !!!!!
Thats the difference. Iran is just selling russia with arms NOT helping them target ukrain !!!
💯
Russia don't need arms they can easily make their own
obviously Iran is indirectly helping russia by supplying weapons that end up in ukraine lol
What's the problem? The west is open about helping Ukraine. It's not a secret
The Chinese are providing trade and ammo to Russia. Your country lies to you. Russia is greatly suffering through this dumb war, why?
Did somebody say BRAINWASHED?????
You are lol that's the irony.
Markov is one of the brainwashers.
@@inthekeyofc That's the point.
That's people who believe everything that Western MSM says.
One of two things, they are brain washed or we are! 😅
Sometimes journalists should shut up. Journalists are not ambassadors. They don't speak for the country.
They are employees of oligarchs who own their media companies
Don’t call these people journalists mate. In Britain no journalists left only propagandists.
The Times male presenter should STF UP and allow his guest to speak without interruption.
As soon as that "guest" began with his propaganda, it was time to stop listening anyway. Liar, he is.
He should be sacked!
The British people need to know that they are, inexplicably, being thrown into harms way. This is potentially more dangerous that 1962.
@hannothephoenician633
3 minutes ago
NO. Putin knows that most of his nuclear bombs fall apart early. The British have the power!!!!!
At least it will make all our existing problems (NHS, debt, immigration, housing, energy, infrastructure, pollution, flooding, net-zero etc.) seem tiny in comparison!
After the SHTF, Britain will become a republic.
Plenty of illegals to go to the front first or will the boats turn back to France
RUSSIA AGAINST THE UK AND AMERICAN LIARS PUTIN WANTED TALKS MONTHS AGO AMERICA THE UK SAID NO THOSE WHO SUPPLY UKRAINE WILL GET PAID BACK SIMPLE.
Russia can't even defeat Ukraine how would they defeat Nato. What a clown!
Ukraine are getting almost unlimited help
They can’t defeat NATO by conventional means, but they have the capability to make NATO countries burn with Russia
And russia has smashed ukraines army
You mean like how NATO couldn’t win in Vietnam and Afghanistan?
@@imirish4702 NATO didn’t fight in Vietnam just the US and Koreans. Afghanistan was a coalition. If you are going to try to be witty at least get your facts right.
Hey Mate well done for standing up against the British Media, from Australia 🦘
I am not clear. What was said about poland? A polish official said to secretary of state blinken that he does not want polish people dying for this usa war that usa is fighting with Russia
Yes I saw it on X. He also said Blinken go home we don't want you here.👍
@@marielouisehjelm6402 X is Russian propaganda.
Strangely everywhere else I've read, Poland is gearing up to be one of NATO's biggest players.
He is correct Ukraine doesn't have targeting equipment. It will be British and US using their systems and actually doung the targeting. This puts it in a whole other game.
You can’t talk to people like this so why give him air time???
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said:
"America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe.
Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break.
Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone.
Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Giving this guy airtime, gives us all a laugh !
Of course you can, what are you on about?
Zelensky has all the time!!!
@@Linara35 ruZZian troll nonsense!!!
Poland said to Blinken and NATO GO HOME !!!
Poland would pay billions of dollars for a US base in their country.
The delusional thoughts of these people is staggering..
With "these people" you mean the ukrainians who have nzi tattoos right?
@@mastermindvideos898 as if russia has no neo nazis 🤡🤡
Yep the interviewer matches your description
stupidity is a dangerous wepon in the wrong hands.thye willpay for it withy life.
The WEST and Britain are the ENEMY not Putin.
The real issue is NATO expansion in Europe, as US wanted to maintain its hegemony, and world police behaviour. This has to be resolute for the world to be in peace!!!!
America seems to be dying from ignoring NATO.
Russia is not European. Russia has no business expanding into Europe.
The question you need to ask is why Russia is so against the nato allies, I’ll tell you why because Russia is an dictatorship and it has brainwashed it’s citizens
Times radio did the clever thing letting this guy talk.
He is the voice of Russian unreason.
Now we know for sure what they think.
Soon, hopefully, they’ll hear what we think.
@roland 😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡😂🤡🤡🤡😂🤡😂🤡
“We”? Please speak only for yourself. I’m with Candace Owens on this: F*** Ukraine. Why you want us to go to war is beyond me, except that you’re either a Zionist or an old-style Jingoist. What have “WE” to gain? Right: zilch.
And what is what "we" think? War to the last Ukrainian? Not me.
I urge you to open a search engine and research what energy does Russia produce and where do they exsport I'll start you off by telling you that Russia exports 50 percent of there gas exports to Europe plz look this up for yourself and BP has a huge portfolio of oil fields I would if I was putin stop the 50 percent of the gas exports to Europe and exspell BP and conferscate the assets in Russia emidatley thats for starters I'm not going too say anything else but you should look this up
You are not us, vatnik@@roberthudson3386
You cannot provoke a bear and expect it to hv sweet dreams.
You reap what you sow. Period.
Just like you can't poke a lion.
and if America weakens Russia the way it wants to, the way Iraq and Libya were, what happens then? Well, we know; mass immigration like you wouldn't believe, a free run on drug shipments, another rash of Russian arms falling into criminal hands the way they did after the USSR broke up, diseases reemerging as health care fails, The Americans tend to go in somewhere, overthrow governments who don't follow the line and then when they get fed up just walk away. And before anyone starts in on how dangerous Libya and Iraq's regimes were, just look at Sudan and Haiti at the moment, how dangerous are they being run by warlords and criminal gangs? But no-one is going in there and 'cleaning up". Ah, no oil, of course. There we have it, petrochemicals.
@@lloydnaylor6113 It's not even a lion anymore
I honestly don't know what to say. So much ignorance and propaganda from both sides tbh. I'm extremely glad that some of the armchair generals in the comment section aren't in command. There is a reason that the west has been very cautious (wisely so) with regards to their decisions on what to give or not to Ukraine. There is no winner in nuclear war. And at some point if you keep calling someone's bluff, then you are totally reliant on them backing... or not. One he'll of a gamble. Get it right and you can say I told you so, get it wrong and there will be nobody left to tell you I told you so.
this kind of self-induced fear is what allowed Hiter, and now Putin to get away with what is essentially genocide
...but it's NOT The West, is it!
Get it right!
It's WEF puppets!!
Only the memory of this comment saying: “I told you so.”
Politicians are for the most part idiots!
I expect some of us will survive to carry on and one day in the future do it all over again.
l am a UK citizen in a county that has clearly gone mad, God help us.
Come on. You think England cannot survive a few hundred nuclear weapon explosions? I'm being facetious of course. Russia has 6,500 nuclear weapons. Many of them twice the size of the USA. With probably less than 20 strategically placed attacks all of the entire country of Great Britain would for the most part cease to exist. Yet, our great leaders want to play games and boisterous behavior as though it were a game. So sad complete fools have been in charge of western nations now for over twenty years.
Complete drivel.
Complete brainwashed I see
@@elonthun8012 Nope, just living in the free “West” where I do not need to worry about falling out of a window if I disagree with the Government.
@@garyddlewis3067 or going to prison for telling the truth like Julian Assange
@@mikecb39 Or suffering the fate of Navalny.
@dougaldouglas8842 What immigration problem does Russia have.
What i don't understand is why this new reporter thinks that Ukraine is winning this war when every western independent military expert says that Russia is winning and that Ukraine can not possibly win. Like this Russian says to loose to Ukraine would allow them to join Nato which would see US missiles placed along it's border which is considered an existential threat by Russia and therefore would deploy a preemptive nuclear strike first in Europe and the the US.
U have answer in your question. - This reporter is not independent.
This reporter is paid very well to lie. He knows the truth.
The Americans did Not want Russian missiles in Cuba …. So Why do they think it’s ok to line them up in Ukraine facing the Russian border ? Disgusting warmongering hypocrisy…
Because people listen not to speacialist but mainstream media and they need their portion of excrements, otherwise poisoned food from fast food or media cabaret.
"Why?" *Blatant hypocrisy and systemic bad faith + a possible zest of wishful (or magical) thinking?
go ahead Ukraine. From UK with love!
When are you off to the front?
@@Samps1992 no need to. Ruscist Ruzzians are embarrassing themselves enough.
Keep us out of it
silly bedroom warrior
@@Samps1992 When I am called up to do so, how about you?
It's not our war leave it for the government to fight their own battles and leave our lads out of it
And our hard earned money!
Well said !!
@@kennethgordon6690 indeed!
If US and UK involved it's only because they are getting something from it. US interfered and put Zelensky there in the first place,
More bluff.
Yet another red line... I think Donnie gifted his pal Vlad with a whole damn pallet-load of red Sharpies the last time they met.
This is the first actual red line from Russia.
All the rest were Western self imposed restrictions.
Bluff until its no bluff. Then western civilization is in trouble because of warmongering western politicians
Push and find out then.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said:
"America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe.
Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break.
Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone.
Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Why don't we send peace negotiators rather than weapons to help end the war?
It takes two.
what an ignorant comment. Have you been watching ? russia has refused peace time and time again.
Why dont all you half witted ignorand idealists use a bit of common sense and start adressing the cause of the problem, which is russia and nobody else. russia needs to leave of its own accord or be forced out, that is the only 2 choices which are acceptable to decency.
Because we don’t want it … we want NATO in Ukraine but obviously we don’t want anything to do with Europe 😅😂
Brilliant question! It shows that UK doesn't really want to end the war
@@isaklein8230 - Russia shows every day that they don’t want to stop the war.
Get the USA out of this debacle. Without the USA's support, it would be over in days.
Why cant politicians fight politicians ????? Iv nothing against anyone or any country ?? Why do us civilians have to be hurt ?????
Yes, tell that to Putin.
Bot comment
bcuz todays world 'leaders' are obsessed with power, not honour
Because they own you, simple.
Agreed.. That would make an awesome TV reality show, with the Kardshian girls holding the cards for the rounds and Trump could be the host LOL😊
RUSSIA did not Want Nato Alliance to close to Russia
And were. Promised that nato would not endorse Ukraine Al agreed with this, but the lying west hid their agenda.
And we don’t want Russia to get close to us
@@coltonconner782 So, don't feed a movement founded on Stepan Bandera's vision! Don't go to Ukraine to overthrow an elected government with a coup d'état, don't go to Ukraine to implement a fascist regime, don't plant NATO structures in Ukraine and don't start persecuting ethnic Russian people with NATO weapons. I just wonder what would have happened if the fascist coup government in Ukraine had actually complied with the Minsk agreements!?
The Russians were there quietly in their little corner, doing gas business with Germany and europe, the closest they were to America was in Alaska, but there is no memory of them ever posing a danger there. Anyway they are not getting close to "us", they are getting far far a way from "us" everytime more close to China... I don't know if you already start to get the result of that for "us".
NOBODY wants to be next to Russia.
The NATO exists to check Russian aggression.
Why would you be surprised that it is helping to check Russian aggression in Ukraine?
I still don't understand all this rush to send billions and weapons to a nation like Ukraine, which meant nothing to Europe until yesterday. With the real risk of plunging us into an economic crisis if things go well, and into a nuclear war if things go badly...
This is because you yourself are not interested in what your country does on the UN councils. What intrigues is he building in other countries? Thousands of different NGOs that work hard in the name of the interests of England or your masters in the USA. Your country sponsors various oppositionists. Including sponsorship through NGOs and various foundations. You support anyone, even a damn bald one, even a bloodthirsty dictator, as long as he is against those who are inconvenient for your country. You have not even read the main strategic interests of your country from open military sources. You probably haven’t heard anything about such goals of British intelligence as the Greater Caucasus project under the protectorate of England (we already call it small/dwarfyBritain, as opposed to Great Britain, which does not exist and will never exist again) Circassia project. Or the British projects regarding their favorite tame hyena - Poland (it was not I who called it that, but your Churchill). It's just that now your tame hyena is feeding from the hands of its new owner - Uncle Sam. This is a project for the union of the Baltic republics of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. Of course, under the protectorate of the main international criminal - the United States and its tame clowns from NATO. You understand that England, far from the Black Sea, indicates its sphere of interest and desire for presence in the Black Sea and the Caucasus. Imagine if China wrote in some official document that until the year 40, their sphere of interest was Scotland and its separation from England. Isn't this an act of war?
Thank Boris Johnston and zelensky.
Thats US plan from the beginning
What great and powerful nation are you from? Mars? Go Ukraine Go🇺🇦
@@yeleedkram But go where? If they keep using weapons, they're doomed. We’re not in a stadium cheering for a team. And in the meantime, they are the ones dying while we sit behind our keyboards. And the tension keeps rising…
They all have lost their minds.
After listening to that stooge's first sentence about "liberating" Ukrainians, I think the UK should give Ukraine everything it can.
@crookedSkwe - if you knew a thing about anything you would know that the Ukrainian people did not want anything to do with US/NATO coup 2014 - so they are ‘liberating’ those people. They will know that the more Beglensky ‘invades’ Russia the more danger they are it. You are a ‘victim’ of US/NATO propaganda. 🤡
Say goodbye to your family, because you don't know what the elites wants o definitely think they want war.
Do you know how much this is costing us? and don't you care about the repercussions?
@@theboraxbandit9563 Not a helpful comment without discussing what mean when you state consequences.
What about future generations of children in Europe including the UK and their children? If this not dealt with now and in the Ukraine it may very well spill over and the UK is not exactly a bastion of strength between it's challenges with reeling from Brexit, immigration and the pandemic. Oh, but I've made your point I hear you say but I say that you are not thinking long term. You can kick the can down the road but when it comes to war, dealing with that sooner rather than later is best, especially if you don't have to fight in it.
@@CrookedSkew Could you define spilling over please? it's those very same reasons you mentioned that I wish this war would end now. Ukraine was always on the table. Putin isn't going to decide "ooo let's have Poland next"
🤣🤣🤣Stop it Putin, you are making me laugh so much.
Why?
@@crozwayne because Putin is a clown
@@crozwayne putin's "red lines" are nothing but bluff, like we have seen in the past 2-3 years
@@crozwayne Because we've heard all these ridiculous kremlin lies before
@@crozwayne It's so funny! It's so entertaining! No comedian could be this funny. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
The Brits will simply call for Bond,James Bond!
What's above Rambo.....
Benny Hill
... or MOSAD
Which Bond? 😅😅😅😅
you mean that faggy character would romance Russian soldiers and succeeded in doing so?
The British lies after lies after lies.
Sergei Markov: If British wants war, go ahead?!
Reporter ask a question... he wants to reply and get interrupted by reporter... what a clown that reporter...
Delusional.
What is delusional is gambling with millions of lives to help out Ukraine. NATO were warned, it seems they followed up on that warning. They were not bluffing like you think they are.
Delusion has nearly religious levels in Russia. Decades of exposure to propaganda can do that to you. Reminds of of North Korean soldiers who escaped - they truly believed they could take on the USA.
If only you knew just how delusional this comment section (and any BBC comment section) is.
Stop poking "The Bear"!
What Bear they starting to wake up the lion
@@coltonconner782 What are you talking about?
It's right time to get 🐻 Fur coat 😅
RUPERT
They can BEARly fight Get Putin NOW.
Switzerland is not a member of NATO. It has never joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. However, the Swiss Armed Forces are participating in the international peace support mission of the Kosovo Force (KFOR) in Kosovo. Obviously Russia does not want Ukraine to join the European Union or NATO.
This will not end well unfortunately 😢
No Nukes will be excahanged . But if the f UK keeps prodding the Russian Bear with this silent high tech missle support for Ukraine without formal US approval then expect serious silent Russsian miltary assistance for Argentna in a potential future Falklands conflict. .
@@josephhenry9924
Russia won't be in a position to help itself soon never mind Argentina , Russia is just realising that the longer this goes on they have no hope of winning
This guy is writing his own rules. War doesn’t work that way.
Why do I get a strong urge to compare car insurance? 🤔
Nice one lol😄
I thought that...
Simples! 😂😂😂
@@gjw2204 😂🤣😂🤣
Breaking News: Sergei Markov has just accidentally fallen out of a 10 story window after this embarrassing interview 🤣
UK doesn't want the smoke ....kier Starmer doesn't have anyone in this country to fight for him over 60% would rather go to prison.
40% of 65 million is still enough
@@straightreject2947it isn’t 40% of 65 million wise guy.
Former advisor to Putin.................says it all!
I wouldn't stand by any windows if I was him.
lolol like his "former chef", he trusts no one because everyone in Russia wants him 6 feet under
@@SirAntoniousBlock brainwashed
We hope the Russians love their childern to !
How many times have we heard this? If Britain is struck, no more Russia. Convinced? No.
also no britain, lots of bots here
Madness absolute suicidal madness to keep prodding the Bear.
@@keithmelling8530 The bear has turned out to be a kitten.
What with old nukes that don’t work
UK nuclear submarines aren't even operation right now.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander!
FACT 😂😂😂
AMEN !
Completely agree with you Russia need to seize European assets in Russia emidatley and stop exporting 50 percent of Europe's gas as well as you say what good for the goose is good for the gander
The stupidity of our species...front and center...
To be fair, humans only say humans are more intelligent than other species because they speak human languages (And can't even understand most of them) the bar was never that high for intelligence it seems.
Why the UK? Why not Poland? They are the main threat.
What he meant was Ukraine can be "independent" like Belarus not Switzerland. 😂
An independent nation is free to make treaties with other nations and groups as it sees fit.
This means and independent nation can join NATO, and nobody who isn't part of NATO has any say in the matter.
You think England better Switerland or Belarus with the economic you have
Интересно сейчас Украина очень независимая?😂 и что именно у них независимое на данный момент😅? Тоже можно сказать и обо всей Европе которая действует не в своих интересах а в интересах США
Кстати почему просроченный президент не проводит выборы? Я так подозреваю не смотря на войну в большинстве регионов у них протекает мирная жизнь как и в России 😊😊
@@tealkerberus748
"This means and independent nation can join NATO" - then Cuba as an independent nation can form a military alliance with Russia and have russian nuclear missiles.
Russia can't even throw Ukraine out of Kursk, how is it going to fight more countries?
@thehighlander1945 Depends upon whom you are prepared to believe.
Yeah how would the biggest nuclear power beat a half dead Ukraine? Hard to figure out isn't it?
@@SJG-nr8uj Belief is not the issue it's whether you get to read free press or get paid working in a troll farm like @thehighlander1945.
Why do you think the western media has suddenly clammed up about Kursk???
@@stevenhull5025 My sources are still openly discussing the successful Ukrainian invasion of russia.
Infuriatingly hard to understand.
Michael, I understand. But please work to understand what he's saying - the lives of many Londoners may depend on their listening carefully to Russia.
This guy hasn’t seen one day of war
The question if Ukraine will be in NATO..... This guy missed the memo, the whole problem started from that. I can answer you that Ukraine will never be a NATO state., they risk to don't be a state at all. Don't you see?
SOME SENCE AT LAST.
Why is "Russia" in Ukraine? ..Tell me again.
Russia attacked the military infrastructure in Ukraine because the Ukrainians stupidly joined with the duplicitous, insanely aggressive Pentagon to establish biological weapons facilities in their country. No worthy leader of ANY country would allow its neighbor to establish threatening weapons facilities. President Putin has been remarkably patient and calm, and there would have been a just peace in April 2022 if the U.S. (sending the lying POS Boris Johnson) hadn't interfered in the peace process.
Someone shaved a meerkat
🤣🤣🤣
Lol
Very funny.
Don't insult meerkats
@@8020-t8g I know they are too cute to be compared with this riff raff😀
I don’t think Russia needs weapons from anybody
its like a Monty Python sketch
Uh... Monty was intelligent.
It's a good thing the UK didn't decommission it's Trident nuclear submarines (like Peter Hitchens among others recommended). If it had these threats would hit a lot harder.
its leaking a bit though
They barely hit as is. Russia can barely even capture a few back gardens in Ukraine. If they want to start throwing missiles about at NATO then it'll only accelerate the collapse of Russia completely.
Corben also
The ukrain has been booming it’s own citizens since 2015
2014
LEARN, how to Spell. THEN comment.
2014
I'd rather fight for Mr Putin than Herr Starmer
😂
Didn’t Russia apply for NATO membership?
Yes it did.
The thing is NATO can't exist when Russia is apart of it because Russia has always been the reason for NATO existence and for spending trillion of $ a year on weapons
Yes, but they were refused. After all, the MIC needs a bogy man
@@studio12archive60 Spot on. If Russia was accepted into NATO, the U.S military industrial complex would have a hard time selling arms.
@@lawrence1318 Not just that but Russia as a world power would have a say in NATO unlike every other country that is in NATO currently, just USA marionetes doing their bidding.
Thats why they were refused, also Russia being in NATO would prevent all these wars as well , speaks volume on who here is interested in bringing war into the world doesn't it.
"The Mouth of Sauron may lie." - Gandalf the White
Any mouthpiece of the Putin regime will _constantly_ lie. Anyone working for Putin is amoral, and they simply have no concept of the truth; they'll say whatever seems to best serve the interests of their ruler, their empire and - most importantly - their bank accounts.
push it
No point interviewing if don’t like the answers
And for balance we will now have Sean Bell on russian tv.
Hang on......
It always seems to be Britain that gets attacked.😂
Because we think we can do as we please with no consequences.
eh? or are 'we' talking about 100s or 1000s of years ago?
Other countries do as they please? Not just the UK?😆
@@irene-jb7jcUK still act like we are a superpower as if it's the empire days it's ridiculous NOT OUR WAR PAY FOR YOUR OWN WAR ZELENSKY
It always ends in the attacker losing.
I've never heard someone so eloquently demand for more punishment.
UK must just go out of this to save people
Forget the usual empty rhetoric of Putin & his pants.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said:
"America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe.
Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break.
Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone.
Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said:
"America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe.
Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break.
Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone.
Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
Ph.D Paul Christie is the Executive Director of the Institute for Global Perspectives, A senior official of the US National Security Agency (NSA) said:
"America needs an order in Ukraine that would interrupt the economic cooperation of Russia and Europe with each other. And the American policy is to develop events in this way. Now events in Ukraine are only unfolding, and there is no point in waiting for pacification - a troubled Ukraine should become an insurmountable barrier between Russia and Europe.
Understand one thing. In order to break the economic ties between Europe and Russia, Europeans need to be so intimidated by the Russian threat that they themselves want to do this - it is necessary to radically change European public opinion about cooperation with Russia. It is necessary to emphasize in every possible way the aggressiveness and unpredictability of Russia, provoking it to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. The media should constantly talk about the growth of tension in Ukraine, about the violence and cruelties perpetrated by the Russians, so that Europe is ripe for a break.
Whether the united Ukraine will remain on the world map or disintegrate is absolutely irrelevant for solving the main problem. The main task of the events in Ukraine is to dissolve Europe with Russia so that the Europeans completely refuse to cooperate with Russia and redirect their economies to full cooperation with the United States. The main goal - to tie Europe's economy more tightly to the US economy, and what happens in Ukraine in this case does not interest anyone.
Ukraine is given the role of the rubble, which will interrupt European cooperation with Russia. And what kind of structure there will be, the form of government - these are absolutely not interesting questions.
@dato - Yeah just ignore it big shot - Russia is bound to be quaking in its boots now that Starmers the Pensioner murderer has entered the arena. You seem to have plenty of money for Ukraine and immigrants.
Do you dream the NATO countries Germany, Holland, Turkey, Hungry are going to allow the use of Nuclear weapons on their doorstep?
You are on your own England. Bye Bye
The G7 (G8? G9) is in a proxy civil war. Do nukes make any sense in a civil war?
No, he won't
Like British liberated Iraq because of nuclear weapons?!
Yeah the commentator he'll smirk until he sees a white Flash🤟🏼💀
V.Putin is KGB Soldier...
No fooling around.
In the old days the protagonists led their armies into battle on a battlefield... Today they cower under their beds and send the flowers of their youth to die....
Poking the bear...not a good idea..
4:14 she got a reality check after he said yes😂
So did I hear correctly? You are suggesting that you want to take on NATO next?
Yes.
Shorty.
Does.
😂
Well they have taken on billions upon billions of dollars of NATO weaponry.
No, they are taking on NATO now!
@@gregory7451 Q. Where exactly is this Russia and Iran?
🙂
@@gregory7451don't forget North Korea. They made an agreement this summer. Protect eachother