Save HOURS by Making This ONE Change in Capture One

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 6

  • @GlennHubbers
    @GlennHubbers 7 дней назад

    Hey Kevin, I just started using Capture 1. My 30 days is almost up and I'm definitely keeping it!
    I found your channel when looking for help and subscribed after watching 3 videos! You are providing excellent help!
    So far I have only been looking at your Capture 1 videos, but I'm looking forward to diving into others as well.
    I've had a very similar naming convention for years. The only issue I ran into is for events where I am using a rapid fire on the camera. With cameras these days capable of shooting 8-20 frames per second this naming would run into an issue with groups of images trying to have the same name. I do a lot of concert photography so this is a frequent scenario for me.
    I started using a sequence after the seconds, but the sequence applies to the whole group, not just where there would be multiples. This was confusing.
    So I ended up using GTH-YYMMDD-000x and forgetting about the time.
    I do like your idea about adding the "photo by..." text on export. I might start using that one!

  • @LeachyPeachy99
    @LeachyPeachy99 Год назад +1

    Dude! You literally saved me SO MUCH TIME. Thank you for this video and your other one on setting up your overall Capture One workspace. You are a godsend. Seriously.

  • @marcmcmullan3598
    @marcmcmullan3598 2 года назад +2

    Brilliant as always. Appreciate you taking the time to put this together.

  • @erikmarcinkowskiphotography
    @erikmarcinkowskiphotography 2 года назад

    Do you feel there is value in going back and renaming old jobs files from years past?

    • @StudioBuilder
      @StudioBuilder  2 года назад +1

      Do I? Yes. Would I? It depends. Since I use sessions for each shoot, but also have an archive catalog for all my past sessions, renaming them in the session would disassociate them in the catalog. If I rename them via the catalogue, that might still work, since sessions read images in the session folder instead of a database. I'll have to look into it.
      I guess the REAL QUESTION is do YOU think there is value in renaming old jobs? If I didn't have my master catalog, I would absolutely do this for any session prior to me using this naming schema.