I wonder what role diseases played in the Neanderthal extinction? Since we interbred to a certain degree, we must have been similar enough to spread diseases easily between us I assume.
@@catsandcrows8880 higher tolerance against parasites. Higher cholesterol acting antiviral. They survived several ice age shifts which let them to have highly adaptable immune systems
@@mursalwarsame5839 Yeah...but there are too many exceptions to what they are saying is a rule. Plus poor nutrition is a temporary effect... as soon as it us fixed the children with good nutrition would grow to full height.. so it's not just nutrition..
I don't understand why you say we must be very careful because climate adaptation is also cultural adaptation. This is saying too much, it goes without saying, already understood. You preface by pulling the heart and then pulling it down requiring response. The Chinese see all Europeans as red haired with long noses, confirmed Neanderthal characteristics. The Europeans see all Chinese as black haired with small noses, probable Denisovan features? Would the possibility of neanderthals having retained their thick body hair, instead of having manufactured clothing like sapiens, be the influencing factor on their body shape? Perhaps the only reason sapiens made clothing is because we were the first animals to lose their hair and the only way or African ancestors could migrate north at a rate faster than evolving or hair back was to wear clothes. In turn we didn't need to regrow or fur?
I don't understand why you say we must be very careful because climate adaptation is also cultural adaptation. This is saying too much, it goes without saying, already understood. You preface by pulling the heart and then pulling it down requiring response.
True. Cro-Magnons were the Homo Sapiens coming up out of Africa 45,000 years ago or so, albeit possibly with some Neanderthal admixture once they got there. Cro-Magnon skulls are basically Homo Sapiens skulls.
@@kwarrior2895: I suppose if you took a modern Western European and put him next to a miraculously surviving Cro-Magnon, you'd see some difference. But these differences would be dwarfed by the huge differences between modern humans and Neanderthals. Dwarfed.
6:30 what about pygmies hot weather short bodies, but not stocky. north africa: long journeys chasing game. so long distance runners now. borneo. need to be small to easily get through the jungle with small paths etc.
It’s not a Tall vs. Short hypothesis. It’s based on the ratio of body mass to body surface area. High body surface sheds heat (advantageous in hot climates). Low surface area conserves heat (advantageous in cold climates). This ratio is entirely independent of height.
with every magnetic reversal, the behavior of life on earth changed. evolution is happening along with changes in the magnetic field. the magnetic field also interacts with the weather.
Yup. Lol. We get big doses of radiation everytime that thing flips and some parts of Arthur exposed differently than others it actually goes hand-in-hand with Evolution perfectly and explains all the random crap that goes down big blast of radiation and big changes in weather patterns
@@poleflux Every applied force has an equal and opposite force. But I suspect the force applied by these flips on planetary life is less significant than you'd think.
The Chinese see all Europeans as red haired with long noses, confirmed Neanderthal characteristics. The Europeans see all Chinese as black haired with small noses, probable Denisovan features?
“Tall” has nothing to do with cold/hot climate adaptation. It’s about the ratio of body surface area to body mass. High surface area ratio sheds heat more efficiently. Low surface area ratio conserves heat. Also, there will always be outlier populations compared to the aggregate. The aggregate of all African populations has a much higher surface area to mass ratio than the aggregate of all European populations.
Is it possible that modern humans of 40,000-50,000 years ago had greater cultural adaptability and occupied niches sooner than Neanderthals in warming periods? When they expanded out of their ice age refuges, we were already there and we drove them to extinction by taking their range away. It appears that modern humans were restricted to the warmer parts of Eurasia until about 50,000 years ago. Moving into colder areas had to wait until they had the culture and technology to survive there. Before that, they had no advantage and were unable to invade the Neanderthal areas. Asian Homo Erectus may have survived as long as they did for the same reason.
It is 2022 and it has now been shown that Neanderthals mainly went extinct because they were drastically inbred. That was because their 4 or so populations were so isolated from each other due to climate. They did not need us to do it for them.
Our earliest known humanoid ansesters were perhaps half a million years ago... Eh? Lucy was much older than that and they have found another one since there a different species again. Maybe 3 to 7 million years old...
Would the possibility of neanderthals having retained their thick body hair, instead of having manufactured clothing like sapiens, be the influencing factor on their body shape? Perhaps the only reason sapiens made clothing is because we were the first animals to lose their hair and the only way or African ancestors could migrate north at a rate faster than evolving or hair back was to wear clothes. In turn we didn't need to regrow or fur?
I believe we hominins lost most of our body hair very early in our evolution so that we could cool ourselves by sweating. Neanderthals would not have gained it back to stay warm.
Mastering the use of fire has caused more changes to our bodies than any other, it has caused our lost of body hair requiring us to use animal skins and fire to keep warm
The craniofacial morphology of modern humans is due to self domestication. It coheres with the cranial morphology found in all domesticated species, and is a result of premature separation from the mother.
I dont think premature separation from the mother has something to do. Apes and specially us have really large infancies. Also self domestication occurs in other free species such as bonobos. In our case, our notorious neotenia probably has to do with our helplessness at birth due to a need to get out of the bipedal narrow pelvis of our mothers before our brains and skulls get too big.
@@search895 You seem to have read Richard Wranghams book about the subject. It's highly politicized science though, and there is nothing to indicate that bonobos used to have larger brains. On the contrary it's worth wile noting that all big brained animals spend years fostering one or two offspring at a time. Near the other end of that scale are animals like the pacific oyster (with hardly a brain at all), which spreads up to 300 million eggs into the currents each year, and there is an obvious connection in nature between quality and quantity, investment and output, or however one prefers to put it. Increased care for the offspring has demanded bigger brains, up through the evolution, and there is a logic to this which can no longer be ignored. The human brain is already 15% smaller than it used to be, the average age of puberty has been reduced by five years over the past 250 years alone, and there is a very ugly truth to this that the elite wants to hide.
Might you elaborate? What do you mean by reduced by 5 years? So humans used to spend a longer time developing? I heard the brain is smaller too - less animal fats, less hunting, ect, and more grains involved in this brain size loss maybe? I would like to hear your thoughts, if you don't mind. Thank you.
Isn't it an absolute scandal to say hot weather triggers evolutionary growth of limbs, while not mentioning Central African pygmee tribes, nor Salvadorenos, both far from ever being the tallest..? Isn't it a scandal to speak of nasal cavity for moisture in Africans and Caucasians while not even touching a word about the experience of each other in a foreign climate? Do my African friends in Canada suffer from nose dryness? I want to know. As a narrow-nosed person ;) did I get extreme moisture complications when living in wet South Asia? Seems we have live humans to prove the theory wrong before we even get any further into this evolutionary dream that the searcher is dedicating to.
.. of course you're not going to evolve based on a short visit somewhere,, twat.. I am mixed race and do have a wide nose cavity and live in Canada, with the cold weather I have nothing but uncomfortable issues. Rather than being narrow-minded PC robot why don't you just look at what's happened in the animal kingdom and their evolutionary traits that are mirrord Regionally in humans
Pygmies still are within Allens rule. Thin hips and long limbs for their short bodies they just aren't tall plus jungle are not resource rich for food most Africans are descendent from Saharan farmers from the North West or Eastern Africa.
These are the dumbest comments i have seen in a while. Thanks UCTV, some of us are interested regardless.
I totally agree with you! The stupidity is absolutely, mind-bogglingly, moronic beyond compare. Thank goodness for UCTV
I wonder what role diseases played in the Neanderthal extinction? Since we interbred to a certain degree, we must have been similar enough to spread diseases easily between us I assume.
Ingjerd LA I read that they had more robust immune systems
@@user-pe2yx9kt4e Yes, me too - but in which way? Were they more robust generally or in some ways? Do we actually know?
@@catsandcrows8880 higher tolerance against parasites. Higher cholesterol acting antiviral. They survived several ice age shifts which let them to have highly adaptable immune systems
Ummm...now explain why many Northern European people are very tall and thin...
The Sami people's average body shape is shorter with shorter limbs like the Inuit, they are the most northern Europeans, living in the coldest climes.
@Sultan King Or vice versa, there are also Africans who are very short...
@@jennifermcclean1308 pygmies are the shorthest humans but it is an adaptation due a shortage of food in the jungles :)
@@mursalwarsame5839 Yeah...but there are too many exceptions to what they are saying is a rule. Plus poor nutrition is a temporary effect... as soon as it us fixed the children with good nutrition would grow to full height.. so it's not just nutrition..
@rent a shill exactly.
The introduction is far too long. So much talk about CARTA and so much music is un-necessary.
I learnt long ago to skip from the beginning beyond the long intro.. :(
Its like a minute wtf is wrong with u
And why are thumbs up on this comment lol. Did you watch a minute and comment?
Y’all Neanderthals
This is not live tv bro. You can skip ahead.
I don't understand why you say we must be very careful because climate adaptation is also cultural adaptation. This is saying too much, it goes without saying, already understood. You preface by pulling the heart and then pulling it down requiring response.
The Chinese see all Europeans as red haired with long noses, confirmed Neanderthal characteristics.
The Europeans see all Chinese as black haired with small noses, probable Denisovan features? Would the possibility of neanderthals having retained their thick body hair, instead of having manufactured clothing like sapiens, be the influencing factor on their body shape?
Perhaps the only reason sapiens made clothing is because we were the first animals to lose their hair and the only way or African ancestors could migrate north at a rate faster than evolving or hair back was to wear clothes. In turn we didn't need to regrow or fur?
Thanks
at 8:56 he says there aren't artic sites but in those times wouldn't the type of sites that we would expect currently be under water?
Why is Homo capensis always ignored by academics?
I don't understand why you say we must be very careful because climate adaptation is also cultural adaptation. This is saying too much, it goes without saying, already understood. You preface by pulling the heart and then pulling it down requiring response.
Thank you ucsd.... If neanderthal had such institution of education, they wouldn't be extinct today.....
XD
But they had ! ;-)
I do not know very much about this subject , but Cro-Magnon skull shapes are more similar to Western Europeans than Neandertals.
True. Cro-Magnons were the Homo Sapiens coming up out of Africa 45,000 years ago or so, albeit possibly with some Neanderthal admixture once they got there. Cro-Magnon skulls are basically Homo Sapiens skulls.
@@joeschultz2 Cro magnons don't look like Western Europeans.
@@kwarrior2895: I suppose if you took a modern Western European and put him next to a miraculously surviving Cro-Magnon, you'd see some difference. But these differences would be dwarfed by the huge differences between modern humans and Neanderthals. Dwarfed.
@@joeschultz2 Is grimaldi cromagnon because he looks African...
@@kwarrior2895 yep! I was thinking the same thing. People usually don't point out the more "Africoid" features common in cro magnon.
6:30 what about pygmies hot weather short bodies, but not stocky.
north africa: long journeys chasing game. so long distance runners now.
borneo. need to be small to easily get through the jungle with small paths etc.
Northern europeans, tall wide shoudlers world strongest men
@@mrwideboy Then you have not seen Senegalese or Tongans.
It’s not a Tall vs. Short hypothesis. It’s based on the ratio of body mass to body surface area. High body surface sheds heat (advantageous in hot climates). Low surface area conserves heat (advantageous in cold climates). This ratio is entirely independent of height.
Understanding ourselves will need a Yogic view.
with every magnetic reversal, the behavior of life on earth changed. evolution is happening along with changes in the magnetic field. the magnetic field also interacts with the weather.
Yup. Lol. We get big doses of radiation everytime that thing flips and some parts of Arthur exposed differently than others it actually goes hand-in-hand with Evolution perfectly and explains all the random crap that goes down big blast of radiation and big changes in weather patterns
@Philoctetes 82 it has already begun to mutate virus'
@@poleflux Every applied force has an equal and opposite force.
But I suspect the force applied by these flips on planetary life is less significant than you'd think.
The Chinese see all Europeans as red haired with long noses, confirmed Neanderthal characteristics.
The Europeans see all Chinese as black haired with small noses, probable Denisovan features?
Bro there a reason the old researchers used to classify us as different species at first, they didn't match up, but now you can't say that
@@yomamawanmadikku9094 yes you can
Did he say that the DNA suggests that niana thoughts had some of the light hair and light skin characteristics or does not?
You might want to rewrite that question, because that's not english.
Pygmys are short and Vikings are tall. I listened to this for fifteen minutes and he said absolutely nothing. So yeah, just skip the first 15 minutes.
Aspirative Music Production yeah most of it was nothing, only part I really found interesting was about the nose
“Tall” has nothing to do with cold/hot climate adaptation. It’s about the ratio of body surface area to body mass. High surface area ratio sheds heat more efficiently. Low surface area ratio conserves heat. Also, there will always be outlier populations compared to the aggregate. The aggregate of all African populations has a much higher surface area to mass ratio than the aggregate of all European populations.
Souther India and sri lanka are also tropical countries people who live there are super short
Is it possible that modern humans of 40,000-50,000 years ago had greater cultural adaptability and occupied niches sooner than Neanderthals in warming periods? When they expanded out of their ice age refuges, we were already there and we drove them to extinction by taking their range away. It appears that modern humans were restricted to the warmer parts of Eurasia until about 50,000 years ago. Moving into colder areas had to wait until they had the culture and technology to survive there. Before that, they had no advantage and were unable to invade the Neanderthal areas. Asian Homo Erectus may have survived as long as they did for the same reason.
I've read a similar theory where the climate begun to benefit Homo sapien more than Neanderthals.
It is 2022 and it has now been shown that Neanderthals mainly went extinct because they were drastically inbred. That was because their 4 or so populations were so isolated from each other due to climate. They did not need us to do it for them.
Our earliest known humanoid ansesters were perhaps half a million years ago... Eh?
Lucy was much older than that and they have found another one since there a different species again. Maybe 3 to 7 million years old...
Ah...I have to say I didn't know they measured the rate of divergence, haha...15:52...
Still seeing and hearing racist content in your advertisement in the juxtaposition of words with certain images. Shameful.
?
You are imagining things that aren’t there. Seek help.
You’re insecurity is showing. No shame?
Would the possibility of neanderthals having retained their thick body hair, instead of having manufactured clothing like sapiens, be the influencing factor on their body shape?
Perhaps the only reason sapiens made clothing is because we were the first animals to lose their hair and the only way or African ancestors could migrate north at a rate faster than evolving or hair back was to wear clothes. In turn we didn't need to regrow or fur?
That ignores alot of archeology
I believe we hominins lost most of our body hair very early in our evolution so that we could cool ourselves by sweating. Neanderthals would not have gained it back to stay warm.
the further out you go from a reversed brain and brains in a normal field the more modern you become.
The speaker's vocal fry and constant "uh's" "um's" make this a very painful lecture to listen to.
put it at x1,5 playing speed. it gets better.
It doesn't bother me.
Mastering the use of fire has caused more changes to our bodies than any other, it has caused our lost of body hair requiring us to use animal skins and fire to keep warm
The craniofacial morphology of modern humans is due to self domestication. It coheres with the cranial morphology found in all domesticated species, and is a result of premature separation from the mother.
I dont think premature separation from the mother has something to do. Apes and specially us have really large infancies. Also self domestication occurs in other free species such as bonobos. In our case, our notorious neotenia probably has to do with our helplessness at birth due to a need to get out of the bipedal narrow pelvis of our mothers before our brains and skulls get too big.
@@search895 You seem to have read Richard Wranghams book about the subject. It's highly politicized science though, and there is nothing to indicate that bonobos used to have larger brains. On the contrary it's worth wile noting that all big brained animals spend years fostering one or two offspring at a time. Near the other end of that scale are animals like the pacific oyster (with hardly a brain at all), which spreads up to 300 million eggs into the currents each year, and there is an obvious connection in nature between quality and quantity, investment and output, or however one prefers to put it. Increased care for the offspring has demanded bigger brains, up through the evolution, and there is a logic to this which can no longer be ignored. The human brain is already 15% smaller than it used to be, the average age of puberty has been reduced by five years over the past 250 years alone, and there is a very ugly truth to this that the elite wants to hide.
Might you elaborate? What do you mean by reduced by 5 years? So humans used to spend a longer time developing? I heard the brain is smaller too - less animal fats, less hunting, ect, and more grains involved in this brain size loss maybe? I would like to hear your thoughts, if you don't mind. Thank you.
Isn't it an absolute scandal to say hot weather triggers evolutionary growth of limbs, while not mentioning Central African pygmee tribes, nor Salvadorenos, both far from ever being the tallest..? Isn't it a scandal to speak of nasal cavity for moisture in Africans and Caucasians while not even touching a word about the experience of each other in a foreign climate? Do my African friends in Canada suffer from nose dryness? I want to know. As a narrow-nosed person ;) did I get extreme moisture complications when living in wet South Asia? Seems we have live humans to prove the theory wrong before we even get any further into this evolutionary dream that the searcher is dedicating to.
.. of course you're not going to evolve based on a short visit somewhere,, twat..
I am mixed race and do have a wide nose cavity and live in Canada, with the cold weather I have nothing but uncomfortable issues.
Rather than being narrow-minded PC robot why don't you just look at what's happened in the animal kingdom and their evolutionary traits that are mirrord Regionally in humans
Pygmies still are within Allens rule. Thin hips and long limbs for their short bodies they just aren't tall plus jungle are not resource rich for food most Africans are descendent from Saharan farmers from the North West or Eastern Africa.
African can have small nasal cavity in dry areas and in high altitudes.
@@kwarrior2895 you know a lot, man! Especially about the Green Sahara and Africa. You should start making content.
Jj