Youre laughable. Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and youll know why.
KSA did it....Laguna as well...Ormoc my bet medyo kinbhan pero may punto nmn... those questions are not really hard to explain or interpret...mga kinakabhan lng mga pogi nating Misters kya medyo tagilid ibang answers...payo ko lng sa mga magbabalak magcompete nxt Misters eh short and concise answer is definitely not bad...and please please please...train and educate pa natin etong mga wagi na lalaban at ihanda pagdating sa q&a...more power...
Youre right with KSA. Plus Cebu City and Ormoc. Laguna is a bit off. He was just rephrasing the quote. Its an answer. The other 3 above have more depth and substantive response.
Youre making a moron out of yourself. Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand.
Love the answer of FilCom KSA, Cebu given ksi education, c Ormoc nagfocus sya sa rootword na journalism,now i know na bumaba ang placement n Naga nagbuckle eh🤗 playsafe si tuburan Cebu at si Laguna wait lang Save the best forda last bebs!
Finally someone got it right! You got babe! Cebu City, KSA & Ormoc gave the best response. Youre listening well! Others say Laguna. Not even close. He was just rephrasing the quote. Haha
Dont make yourself sound idiot with your pronouncement. I think you Either dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand better. Youll know why.
@@agnusborealis9362 And you think by calling me name makes you look smarter? What is your credential? I taught university and graduate school English in the Philippines and Im teaching English in Los Angeles California. What is your credential? I teach reading comprehension, critical analysis and writing. Ormoc? If you think Ormoc is in top three, I will give you a fat "F."
@@agnusborealis9362 Let me give you a short lecture on semantics and linguistics. The topic "Ratings don't last. Good journalism does" was all about ratings (viewership number) and media competition - kung sinong pinapakinggan, binabasa at pinanonood, compared to the honest, factual and neutral news media reporting that usually triumphs in the end. Ang sagot ni Ormoc: "...(1) so based on my own interpretation of this quote, it simply means it's not based on how you work or how you succeed your work (grammar lapses. First sentence pa lang out of topic na). (2) It's more on how hard you tried to do your work, especially that journalism is about making stories (another sentence that's out of topic). (3) It's not about rating; it's all about how you value or how you accept yourself (where is this flow of thoughts going? accept yourself? why is the self included? How is the question of self acceptance related to the topic?), and how proud you are of your own work (out of topic). The prompt needs COMPARISON AND CONTRAST of two kinds of journalism- the sensationalized and highly opinionated journalism versus good journalism- the kind that is honest, straight forward, and factual. Ormoc talks about the person, but it's not about the self. It's not about the writer's belief in his ability to create a story. It is NOT about him. It is about the quality of an honest and factual journalism that lasts because it has the quality that people trust. Again, it is about the quality of journalism, NOT about the journalist's trust of his craft. All of his three long sentence answers did not explain the topic. If you missed this glaring mistakes and dared calling me idiot, I think you're talking about yourself. Lecture ends. Now, write your response and I will grade you according to the content development with details, explanation and illustration (60%) and sentence constructions skills, usage, grammar and writing mechanics (40%). Take this test. Go!
@@agnusborealis9362 Here is Laguna's prompt and answer. "We design our lives through the power of our choices." ..."(1) My own opinion, ahh, my own perspective of this quote is we define our lives. (2) We choose our path. (3) It is not handed to you on a spoon. (4) You must be a man. (5) You must be responsible enough to make your own choices so you can make your own future." Now prove to me that you're smarter and I'm an idiot by taking a line (sentence or phrase from Laguna's answer, just tell me the number) that goes beyond the topic. Tell me how and why this is NOT succint and straightforward answer.
@@ferdie092470 oh really??? Hmmmm… Im not impressed. So much so that Your credentials dont even reflect your choice. If thats how you do critical analysis, i wont even dare read and immediately throw your paper into the bin! My educational and professional credentials are far higher than yours, certainly. But i dont need to brag them (like what you did) because i dont want dignify your insecurities. Youre way behind my league honey. Study more… and harder! Bye!
Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand.
@@agnusborealis9362 you're talking about yourself. I noticed you go around judging people and even calling them names just because they don't share your personal opinion. Who are you to tell people "you got it all wrong?" Explain why Ormoc is in your top three. Do a phrase by phrase analysis. Let's see if you got it right.
Nope. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc (top 3) who gave the best response. Laguna is a bit off. He was just rephrasing the quote. Its an answer. The other 3 above have more depth and substantive response. Listen again and youll know why.
If I were to judge them according to understanding and appropriately responding to the question, language ability and idea/topic development skills (either in English or Filipino languages), and communicative confidence and articulation, these are my top 5 winners: Laguna 10 pts, Cebu 9.5 pts, Nueva Ecija 9.3 pts, KSA 9.0 pts, Tuburan Cebu 8.8 pts. The rest have language and communicative skills but did not answer the questions properly. Many of them have the penchant of making their own lives and experiences as an illustration but did not aptly hit the mark.
@@agnusborealis9362 Let me give you a short lecture on semantics and linguistics. The question was all about ratings (viewership number) and media competition - kung sinong pinapakinggan, binabasa at pinanonood, compared to the honest, factual and neutral news media reporting that usually triumphs in the end. Ang sagot ni Ormoc: "...so based on my own interpretation of this quote, it simply means it's not based on how you work or how you succeed your work (grammar lapses). It's more on how hard you tried to do your work, especially that journalism is about making stories. It's not about rating; it's all about how you value or how you accept yourself, and how proud you are of your own work. Here, analyze it. The question needs COMPARISON of a sensationalized and highly opinionated journalism versus good journalism- the kind that is honest, straight forward, and factual. Ormoc talks about the person, but it's not about the self. It's not about the writer's belief in his ability to create a story. It is NOT about him. It is about the quality of honest and factual journalism that lasts because it has the quality that people trust. IT IS A COMPARISON OF TWO KINDS OF JOURNALISM, not about the journalist belief of himself and of his craft. Lecture ends. Now, write your response and I will grade you according to the content development with details and explanation (60%) and sentence constructions skills (40%). Take this test. Go!
Mga pogi sumasali dito pero mga minor titles lang pinaglalabanan. Who owned naba the franchise of Mister Manhunt International, and the Mister International? Sayang mga boys popogi
Manhunt franchise has been with Jonas Gaffud of MUP for several years now. Mister International Phil. is now a standalone pageant last produced by it's parent Mister International just a few months ago.
Because they speak well and coherent. And comfortable with English. The quality of esucation is evident. Thats the weakness of GMA/ Luzon. An area of improvement. No offense meant.
Good job guys. But i think the top 3 candidates who gave the best response in terms of logic, coherence are: 1. Cebu City: the best! Flawless! 2. KSA 3. Ormoc
Ayus nman pla set ng studio nla bakit may nigatibo parin kumento..talaga nman ang pinoy walang sawang manira ng iba ...tingnan nyu muna sarili nyu yung busher na yan hayup ka talaga...tumigil ka ...
I think so. Its evident even in female pageants. I think its because of their upbringing and education. Cebuanos in particular are honed to speak english very well. Thats why theyre so comfortable with it, as its their mother tongue.
I wish... I was able to conduct workshop on expounding statements for these men. But a brilliant twist to Q&A! Congratulations!
Laguna has the best answer that really point out the question.
Youre laughable. Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and youll know why.
Congrats Visayas Region mabuhay and congrats to all the contestants
Walang perfectong tao sa mondo..🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Naga getting Man Hot Star Title is so befitting. His looks will be a great shoo-in in Thailand. Mukha nga syang Thai!
hope naga city should join again in manhunt philippines or appointed as mr. supranational 2023 since he has the caliber on the said pageant
Naga wins in Thailand,he is handsome and hot,
Education and educating is different
KSA did it....Laguna as well...Ormoc my bet medyo kinbhan pero may punto nmn... those questions are not really hard to explain or interpret...mga kinakabhan lng mga pogi nating Misters kya medyo tagilid ibang answers...payo ko lng sa mga magbabalak magcompete nxt Misters eh short and concise answer is definitely not bad...and please please please...train and educate pa natin etong mga wagi na lalaban at ihanda pagdating sa q&a...more power...
Youre right with KSA. Plus Cebu City and Ormoc. Laguna is a bit off. He was just rephrasing the quote. Its an answer. The other 3 above have more depth and substantive response.
Yesss.. Laguna nailed it
Youre making a moron out of yourself. Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand.
Love the answer of FilCom KSA, Cebu given ksi education, c Ormoc nagfocus sya sa rootword na journalism,now i know na bumaba ang placement n Naga nagbuckle eh🤗 playsafe si tuburan Cebu at si Laguna wait lang Save the best forda last bebs!
Finally someone got it right! You got babe! Cebu City, KSA & Ormoc gave the best response. Youre listening well! Others say Laguna. Not even close. He was just rephrasing the quote. Haha
Pinaka magaling sumagot si Laguna. At siya rin ang pinaka gwapo.
Dont make yourself sound idiot with your pronouncement. I think you Either dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand better. Youll know why.
@@agnusborealis9362 And you think by calling me name makes you look smarter? What is your credential? I taught university and graduate school English in the Philippines and Im teaching English in Los Angeles California. What is your credential? I teach reading comprehension, critical analysis and writing. Ormoc? If you think Ormoc is in top three, I will give you a fat "F."
@@agnusborealis9362 Let me give you a short lecture on semantics and linguistics. The topic "Ratings don't last. Good journalism does" was all about ratings (viewership number) and media competition - kung sinong pinapakinggan, binabasa at pinanonood, compared to the honest, factual and neutral news media reporting that usually triumphs in the end. Ang sagot ni Ormoc: "...(1) so based on my own interpretation of this quote, it simply means it's not based on how you work or how you succeed your work (grammar lapses. First sentence pa lang out of topic na). (2) It's more on how hard you tried to do your work, especially that journalism is about making stories (another sentence that's out of topic). (3) It's not about rating; it's all about how you value or how you accept yourself (where is this flow of thoughts going? accept yourself? why is the self included? How is the question of self acceptance related to the topic?), and how proud you are of your own work (out of topic). The prompt needs COMPARISON AND CONTRAST of two kinds of journalism- the sensationalized and highly opinionated journalism versus good journalism- the kind that is honest, straight forward, and factual. Ormoc talks about the person, but it's not about the self. It's not about the writer's belief in his ability to create a story. It is NOT about him. It is about the quality of an honest and factual journalism that lasts because it has the quality that people trust. Again, it is about the quality of journalism, NOT about the journalist's trust of his craft. All of his three long sentence answers did not explain the topic. If you missed this glaring mistakes and dared calling me idiot, I think you're talking about yourself. Lecture ends. Now, write your response and I will grade you according to the content development with details, explanation and illustration (60%) and sentence constructions skills, usage, grammar and writing mechanics (40%). Take this test. Go!
@@agnusborealis9362 Here is Laguna's prompt and answer. "We design our lives through the power of our choices." ..."(1) My own opinion, ahh, my own perspective of this quote is we define our lives. (2) We choose our path. (3) It is not handed to you on a spoon. (4) You must be a man. (5) You must be responsible enough to make your own choices so you can make your own future." Now prove to me that you're smarter and I'm an idiot by taking a line (sentence or phrase from Laguna's answer, just tell me the number) that goes beyond the topic. Tell me how and why this is NOT succint and straightforward answer.
@@ferdie092470 oh really??? Hmmmm… Im not impressed. So much so that Your credentials dont even reflect your choice. If thats how you do critical analysis, i wont even dare read and immediately throw your paper into the bin! My educational and professional credentials are far higher than yours, certainly. But i dont need to brag them (like what you did) because i dont want dignify your insecurities. Youre way behind my league honey. Study more… and harder! Bye!
i am not convinced with Ormoc City's answer...hmmnnn
Laguna lang po ang may direction na sagot sa tanong.
Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again.
Laguna supposed to be a winner He nailed It the Q and A
Either you dont understand the question or youre not listening intently. You got it all wrong. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc. Listen again and understand.
@@agnusborealis9362 you're talking about yourself. I noticed you go around judging people and even calling them names just because they don't share your personal opinion. Who are you to tell people "you got it all wrong?" Explain why Ormoc is in your top three. Do a phrase by phrase analysis. Let's see if you got it right.
@@ferdie092470 trolling!!! Hahahahah!! Eat my dust, sucker!
@@agnusborealis9362 You have no dust. YOU ARE DUST! Cantankerous old snake!
@@agnusborealis9362 Puro namecalling. You can't even analyze. Stupid!
8:00
daming categories… parang nag aapply lang ng work.. daming question, daming interview, ending kung sino lang may backer yun lang matatanggap… hahahaha
Pampanga has the International Appeal for Male Pageant ... Very Manly however, he needs more practice for his communication skills.
laguna mn mgaling sumagot... pero c Naga ang gwapooooo...
Nope. Its Cebu City, KSA and Ormoc (top 3) who gave the best response. Laguna is a bit off. He was just rephrasing the quote. Its an answer. The other 3 above have more depth and substantive response. Listen again and youll know why.
Naga is the most handsome and sexy
Nahihirapan ang mAjOrity sa kanila sa pagsagot ..
Tuburan ก้หล่อ
If I were to judge them according to understanding and appropriately responding to the question, language ability and idea/topic development skills (either in English or Filipino languages), and communicative confidence and articulation, these are my top 5 winners: Laguna 10 pts, Cebu 9.5 pts, Nueva Ecija 9.3 pts, KSA 9.0 pts, Tuburan Cebu 8.8 pts. The rest have language and communicative skills but did not answer the questions properly. Many of them have the penchant of making their own lives and experiences as an illustration but did not aptly hit the mark.
Should be Cebu City, KSA & Ormoc. They have more depth and substantive response. Laguna is just rephrasing the quote.
@@agnusborealis9362 Let me give you a short lecture on semantics and linguistics. The question was all about ratings (viewership number) and media competition - kung sinong pinapakinggan, binabasa at pinanonood, compared to the honest, factual and neutral news media reporting that usually triumphs in the end. Ang sagot ni Ormoc: "...so based on my own interpretation of this quote, it simply means it's not based on how you work or how you succeed your work (grammar lapses). It's more on how hard you tried to do your work, especially that journalism is about making stories. It's not about rating; it's all about how you value or how you accept yourself, and how proud you are of your own work. Here, analyze it. The question needs COMPARISON of a sensationalized and highly opinionated journalism versus good journalism- the kind that is honest, straight forward, and factual. Ormoc talks about the person, but it's not about the self. It's not about the writer's belief in his ability to create a story. It is NOT about him. It is about the quality of honest and factual journalism that lasts because it has the quality that people trust. IT IS A COMPARISON OF TWO KINDS OF JOURNALISM, not about the journalist belief of himself and of his craft. Lecture ends. Now, write your response and I will grade you according to the content development with details and explanation (60%) and sentence constructions skills (40%). Take this test. Go!
@@agnusborealis9362 Laguna elucidated the quote. Do you even understand what rephrasing is?
Reality BItes....pede mo pagandahin ang katawan at mukha.....pero hindi ang UTAK
Gwapo nga ni Jovy. Pang Vivamax
Need to practice more on Q and A.
Really? Youre better than all of them? Your condescension and lack of self awareness are blinding!
@@agnusborealis9362 triggered si accla hahaha
I tried to answer those statement and it's fun hahaha
Naga หล่อ
Laguna lng malakas
Mga pogi sumasali dito pero mga minor titles lang pinaglalabanan. Who owned naba the franchise of Mister Manhunt International, and the Mister International? Sayang mga boys popogi
Manhunt franchise has been with Jonas Gaffud of MUP for several years now. Mister International Phil. is now a standalone pageant last produced by it's parent Mister International just a few months ago.
The two hosts mispronounce educating...they said education...wow very simple word but they cant read it correctly
Inulit ng lalaki. Akala ko itatama niya yung babae pero pareho din pala
Hindi kc pinaliit ang font size 😂😂😂
Naga City malapit or malayo guapo sya, pwede sa Mister Global ganyan ang type nila yung charming na lalaking lalaki
Pampanga stuggled so much in his q and a
Ano ba yan mga bisaya na naman ang majority of winners. Ang gagaling.
Because they speak well and coherent. And comfortable with English. The quality of esucation is evident. Thats the weakness of GMA/ Luzon. An area of improvement. No offense meant.
D q gusto un lalaki na kasama ni Sam..d alam mag adjust pagdating sa hosting
Talaga naman i handa ang sarili pag sasali sa ganitong patimpalak...di siya biro ...kon di ka prepared naku, kakahiya
Kalurks
Ang cringe ng "category" ni Sam B + the education/educating na maling sentence construction. Hehe
Good job guys. But i think the top 3 candidates who gave the best response in terms of logic, coherence are:
1. Cebu City: the best! Flawless!
2. KSA
3. Ormoc
These are male pageants so please dont compare them by speaking like miss universe.
si Naga taga bpo ba talaga?
Shoklang shokla magsalita ang emcee na kasama ni Sam Bernardo.
Ayus nman pla set ng studio nla bakit may nigatibo parin kumento..talaga nman ang pinoy walang sawang manira ng iba ...tingnan nyu muna sarili nyu yung busher na yan hayup ka talaga...tumigil ka ...
infer, everyone is so goodlooking. dame lang kinabahan
I do believe all visaya is intelligent compared to luzon
I think so. Its evident even in female pageants. I think its because of their upbringing and education. Cebuanos in particular are honed to speak english very well. Thats why theyre so comfortable with it, as its their mother tongue.
90% walang substance, walang connect, walang impact. Ang shunga ng mga hosts.
Really??? And youre better than them? How so? Tell me, what have you achieved so greatly in life??? Or you dont….
@@agnusborealis9362 use your google, a-hole.
Pano nanalo ormoc???
parang mas magaling png sumagot ang mga grades sch student