Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Openspot 4 pro vs Os3 crossmode audio comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 июн 2022
  • Both hotspots were on Default settings.

Комментарии • 39

  • @thebrokenstringstudio2930
    @thebrokenstringstudio2930 Год назад +1

    excellent test! ty

  • @HamTechRadioScannerDrones
    @HamTechRadioScannerDrones 2 года назад +2

    This is Ace be interesting to see time it takes to crossmode both sound same to me .

  • @G0GCQ
    @G0GCQ 2 года назад +2

    Same to me 👍🏻

  • @hamandshortwaveradioirelan4773
    @hamandshortwaveradioirelan4773 2 года назад

    Hi Chris, after watching your Openspot reviews I am ready to order one. I think they are dispatched within EU, did you get charged duty/vat on your purchase in UK?

  • @JoeMaloneOnTheMoon
    @JoeMaloneOnTheMoon 2 года назад +1

    Same over on my end.

  • @rogershults5607
    @rogershults5607 2 года назад +1

    HELLO CHRIS 2E0UKH
    I just ordered me A openSPOT4 Pro
    thank you for your great videos
    73

    • @Sky1
      @Sky1 7 месяцев назад

      Me too, how is it?

  • @daveborchard2019
    @daveborchard2019 8 месяцев назад

    The OpenSpot4 sounded less robotic than the OpenSpot3. But it still sounded robotic compared to the analog FM mode. I wonder if the audio would sound closer to the FM audio quality if was a Yaesu Fusion transceiver than an Icom D-Star transceiver. I've heard that the YSF audio quality is better than the D-Star audio quality, but I haven't ever heard a demonstration audio comparison.
    I bought the OpenSpot4 Pro, but I don't own a digital portable transceiver yet. I thinking of buying a Yaesu FT5DR because the Icom ID-52A is very user unfriendly to try to configure. But I haven't been able to get the OpenSpot4 Pro to receive the digital signals on my computer or iPhone without a digital transceiver.

    • @xitec75
      @xitec75 7 месяцев назад

      If someone sounds like a robot or not has to to with other circumstances on the sender / gateway side or maybe internet bandwith

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  7 месяцев назад

      Have you tried the app on iPhone or android or Windows shark RF link?

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  7 месяцев назад

      If you use the shark app, you could talk and listen on the phone or computer and enjoy your open 4 pro

    • @daveborchard2019
      @daveborchard2019 7 месяцев назад

      @@digitalanaloguehamradio You can listen with your iPhone, except you have to set your iPhone to never automatically lock the screen, which is a security risk. As soon as the iPhone screen automatically locks, the received audio will stop. They should fix that software bug, so that received audio does not stop when the iPhone screen automatically locks. Other apps behave that way. For example, RUclips or RUclips Premium, where you can listen to the RUclips audio with the iPhone screen auto locked.

  • @garrywoodward9049
    @garrywoodward9049 2 года назад

    Not very good quality on either, but the OS4 is marginally better. Probably not worth upgrading to the 4. I appreciate the comparison Chris.

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  2 года назад +1

      Thanks Garry everything is default settings. I am trying to be as transparent as possible. I do not notice hardly any difference. One is a bit louder and the other is a bit quieter. Thank you for watching mate

  • @ToppKatt7
    @ToppKatt7 2 года назад +1

    Same to me

  • @banjax66
    @banjax66 2 года назад +1

    They both sound the same to me.. Although I have hearing deficiency.. 2E0IFZ

  • @1MinuteFlipDoc
    @1MinuteFlipDoc 2 года назад

    wow, that's a nice ICOM ID-52A! You've got some fun (and expensive) toys! hahah

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  2 года назад

      yes I started out with one hand held you have to build your way up. I had a Chinese handheld only for the first year

  • @barryzoll9772
    @barryzoll9772 2 года назад +1

    439.2 sounds a little more crisp.

  • @stevennelsonjr.3407
    @stevennelsonjr.3407 Год назад

    The problem is everyone sounds terrible on america link, there's too much cross mode activity. Try this test into DMR I think you'd get a better idea.

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  Год назад +1

      I totally agree, it’s not like for like. If it sounds terrible, it’s not the fault of America link or fusion. It’s the fault of other stuff connected.

  • @teh60
    @teh60 2 года назад +1

    Openspot4 is a little clearer but not much.

  • @TerryG7wrs
    @TerryG7wrs 2 года назад +2

    Some to me but at 64 maybe my ears are on the blink

  • @Nathan1975Liggy
    @Nathan1975Liggy 2 года назад +3

    439.200 mHz is the best by far

  • @tomstrickland4665
    @tomstrickland4665 2 года назад +1

    Openspot4 sounds better to me. The audio is much smoother than the openspot3

  • @stewartrv
    @stewartrv 2 года назад +1

    I suppose this is the OS4 not the OS4 Pro ??? I think zero difference in that case, if you had a OS4 Pro then in theory it's using HW decode/encode etc...
    If it's an OS4 Pro, then according to this no need to pay extra for the pro...

  • @peterramsey4611
    @peterramsey4611 Год назад +1

    4 Pro everytime

  • @o00scorpion00o
    @o00scorpion00o 2 года назад

    Not much of a difference, certainly not worth the upgrade from the OS3 in my opinion.
    I've heard that having 2 hotspots on the same channel can get you banned from that channel ?

    • @digitalanaloguehamradio
      @digitalanaloguehamradio  2 года назад +1

      Yes you can get banned. Especially on 30 Charlie which I was. That is why I use two different call signs.

  • @Chris-hy6jy
    @Chris-hy6jy 2 года назад

    Both sound terrible. Really have to concentrate to work out what's been said. That's what happens when you reduce the bandwidth to almost nothing. Wide digital C4FM 12.5khz is much better. I assume the OS4 supports wide digital to Yaesu radios?

  • @DanielCodianni
    @DanielCodianni 2 года назад

    439.200