Thank you for posting entire interview. I could listen to her for hours,she is knowledgable, perfect diction and lovely to look at. She also has a warm personality.
Such a charming. witty, humorous and highly intelligent Princess. She has been a wonderful wife for Prince Michael and a beautiful mother to her two children.
What a refreshing interview of truth, heritage and wisdom from the cherished past. That will forever be immortalised as a treasured iconic recollection, that dances in this remarkable Lady's eyes.
I attended a fundraiser dinner at the Savoy and sat on her table she was utterly Charming and Engaging and i won the first prize from the Tombola and she handed me my Prize... She pulled me in to Kiss my cheek...She smelt...amazing.
You can see that Princesse Michael has an Austrian aristocratic background herself. That specific timeless lady charme, manners and posture only develop in old families with a long tradition of education and manners. I like her and her toughness covered in smile…
@@krishnavyas313…. Yes! and as I recall she spent much of her youth in Sydney, went to Kincoppel convent at Rose Bay in Sydney’s eastern suburbs and her mother was a hairdresser … this was reported at the time of her marriage in the tabloids… I’am a Sydney person but was in London at the time…she fosters the grand image… less is more😊
VERY FASCINATING PRINCESS MICHAEL OF KENT . VERY ARTICULATED, SO BEAUTIFUL AND SO REGAL . I USE TO ADMIRE HER WHEN I FIRST SAW HER IN THE NEWSPAPER . YES , SHE IS REALLY CLASSY . VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND SPEAKS BEAUTIFULLY . I HOPE SHE RECOVER FULLY FROM COVID . GOD BLESS HER .
Such a very delightful guest!! Thank you, Conrad, for your surprising and most entertaining Princess of Kent! I so enjoyed the warmth and enthusiasm during your conversation! We need more of the same!
What a delight, Princess Michael is so well-read, articulate and interesting. Though I think he's capable of much better, I found Black to be unfocused and awkward.
The Princess Pushy label was cruel and totally uncalled for, but as a strong intelligent and beautiful woman she was seen as a threat to the popularity of established Windsor Royals.
Princess Michael is a darling, very classy lady, reminds me of my childhood in London, Conrad always reserved and a latent Brit..i owe you that beer..!
@@rosehickey8483 For you information in the Uk it just one title ! Princess of The United Kingdom of Grait Britain and Northern Ireland. This title is divided in two groups Princess By Brith and Princess by Marriage ! All of them are Princesses ! The rule to use the title is this : when a British prince marries, his wife also becomes a BRITISH PRINCESS by law adquiring the title Princess of The United Kigdom of Grait Britain of Northern Ireland ; however, she is addressed by the feminine version of the husband's senior title on his behalf, either a princely title or a peerage. Traditionally, all wives of male members of the British royal family, the aristocracy, and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. An example of this case is Princess Michael of Kent, the wife of the King's first cousin once removed, Prince Michael of Kent. This happened because any women who married in the Uk adquire the name of their husbans ! Example if Mr Michael Windsor marriage Ms Lucy Davies, she becomes MRS Michael Windsor, other example if Lord Nicholas Thompson marriage Annie Thmpson , she becomes Lady Nicholas Thompson. There is also the case when a princess of blood royal marries a British prince. She also becomes a princess by marriage and will be addressed in the same way. An example of this situation was the late Princess Alexandra, Duchess of Fife: when she married the cousin of her mother, Prince Arthur of Connaught, she became Princess Arthur of Connaught, Duchess of Fife. Another example the late HRH The Princess Beatrice the daughter of Queen Vitoria when she married HRH Prince Henry of Battenberg she becomes HRH Princess Henry of Battenberg NOT Princess Beatrice of Battenberg. If a British prince has a peerage, then the Princess is addressed by the feminine version of her husband's peer title; an example of this case is the wife of Prince William, who was (briefly) officially styled His Royal Highness The Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge while his wife Catherine became Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, omitting both the 'prince' and 'princess' titles and their first names. When William was then created Prince of Wales, that became the senior title held in his own right, and he and Catherine are styled His/Her Royal Highness The Prince/Princess of Wales. This does not mean that if you said The duchess of Sussex , The Duchess of Edinburgh , The Duchess of Kent , The Duchess of Gloucester are Not princesses! They are because they are all wives of a British Prince ! For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign. Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
She's elegant, very intelligent, well read talented and more genuinely Royal in terms of her ancestry than the Windsors. When she married the Queen's cousin (prince Micheal of Kent) the Media predictably accused her of being "haughty" and failed to recognise what a wonderful asset she would be to the rather dull Windsors! She is far better educated than all the other Royal women of her generation or older, and her beauty and accomplishments apparently caused jealousy and insecurity among some senior members in the family....notably princess Margaret who was openly spiteful about the glamorous newcomer. Even the Queen unfortunately was intimidated by Marie and remarked how " grand" she was. Sadly this pattern of disparaging new Royal brides continues to this day in the UK Media.
Sorry but I doubt Margaret gave two hoots about who her cousin married. She was a Princess of England in her own right, and higher rank. Margaret was fun to be around and had enough of a following.
@@alphabet_soup123 Princess Margaret stated very clearly that she would not acknowledge Princess Michael unless she converted to the Church of England. She was very insecure in her later years because she was no longer a senior member of the family with Princess Diana and then William and Harry in the news everyday so she always had to remind everyone that she was the Queens sister and would be your friend one day and then totally ignore you the next.She delighted in making people uncomfortable.
@@alphabet_soup123 I'm just going on what I have read over the years and from collecting data over the years on the family. Her son David had also insulted Princess Michael and when the Queen learnt of this she instructed David to apologise immediately.
My, gosh, she’s splendid! Catnip for every man! She arouses all my inner urges, even at her age. The epitome of the kind of woman men are willing to do anything for - to overlook every peccadillo and flaw - just to squire around on our arms! My goodness, Prince Michael won himself a prize! Intelligent, delicious in appearance, witty, coquettish and divine. I have always heard of the extended Royal Family’s disdain for her, and now I understand why. She outshines every one of them! Methinks I’m in love. Princess Michael, how may I serve you? Thanks for the fine interview!
She is a total racist. It's not just one incident -- it's a string of them through the years. She genuinely believes people from "good" lineage are better people than any others.
@@rosehickey8483 They pay market rates now. The Queen used to pay their rent, but there came a point where they were told to pay up themselves. Prince Michael does not get a Civil List allowance, and the Queen paid up because they did some Royal duties.
Im not saying she is the most beautiful woman in the world. Im just sayn. After 20 minutes I fell in love with her. I can forgive her for her slight of Nixon who I love just a bit more dearly !
Do you know guys that HRH Princess Michael of Kent and HRH The Princess of Wales are the only two British Princess by Marriage that can use the title Princess as Form of Address ! This is in the first case because Prince Michael the husband of Princess Michael do not has a PERAGE TITLE, in the second case , is because William became HRH The Prince of Wales and this title became the highest title in behalf so her wife became HRH The Princess of Wales ! This does not mean that if you said The duchess of Sussex , The Duchess of Edinburgh , The Duchess of Kent , The Duchess of Gloucester are Not princesses! They are because they are all wives of a British Prince ! The Rule to use the title as form of address is the following in the Uk it just one title ! Princess of The United Kingdom of Grait Britain and Northern Ireland. This title is divided in two groups Princess By Brith and Princess by Marriage ! All of them are Princesses ! The rule to use the title is this : when a British prince marries, his wife also becomes a BRITISH PRINCESS by law adquiring the title Princess of The United Kigdom of Grait Britain of Northern Ireland ; however, she is addressed by the feminine version of the husband's senior title on his behalf, either a princely title or a peerage. Traditionally, all wives of male members of the British royal family, the aristocracy, and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. An example of this case is Princess Michael of Kent, the wife of the King's first cousin once removed, Prince Michael of Kent. This happened because any women who married in the Uk adquire the name of their husbans ! Example if Mr Michael Windsor marriage Ms Lucy Davies, she becomes MRS Michael Windsor, other example if Lord Nicholas Thompson marriage Annie Thmpson , she becomes Lady Nicholas Thompson. There is also the case when a princess of blood royal marries a British prince. She also becomes a princess by marriage and will be addressed in the same way. An example of this situation was the late Princess Alexandra, Duchess of Fife: when she married the cousin of her mother, Prince Arthur of Connaught, she became Princess Arthur of Connaught, Duchess of Fife. Another example the late HRH The Princess Beatrice the daughter of Queen Vitoria when she married HRH Prince Henry of Battenberg she becomes HRH Princess Henry of Battenberg NOT Princess Beatrice of Battenberg. If a British prince has a peerage, then the Princess is addressed by the feminine version of her husband's peer title; an example of this case is the wife of Prince William, who was (briefly) officially styled His Royal Highness The Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge while his wife Catherine became Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, omitting both the 'prince' and 'princess' titles and their first names. When William was then created Prince of Wales, that became the senior title held in his own right, and he and Catherine are styled His/Her Royal Highness The Prince/Princess of Wales.
For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign. Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign. Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
She came to England to hook a royal and once she meet Prince Michael she stalked him everywhere. I know another ex aristocrat from Austria who tried many times in England but not successful. She is not so cunning and shrewd like this one.
Yes, must be said she IS a beautiful woman. Educated, chic, talented but oh so vain and affected. Perhaps the two go together. Please note she want called ‘Princess pushy’ for nothing. Better educated than all the RF and speaks several languages - she did it all HER way.
The interviewer was uninterested in her book, he was more into the gossip of the royals. Also, he seems does not like her at all. The princess was so jolly for the interview
People are so ridiculous... my mother had a blackamoor pin... my sister had blackamoor artwork in her bedroom... I knew of some millionaires who spent a fortune on very antique chandeliers that had blackamoors in them . The political correctness thing has become so insane and twisted that just showing an image of anything different is considered prejudice . If you wore a t-shirt with a black person on it does that make you prejudice ?
@@danielwatson743 actually it's the people who think everyone is a racist that are weird . Blackamoor art was and has been highly revered for a long time ... of course God forbid someone should make artwork or any kind of icons out of a black person right ? Please get educated
One gets the impression that she really wants everyone to care, but the reality is that no one is interested. Minor, forgettable "royalty". Sorry, but insignificant.
you most certainly are entitled to your opinion. I don’t like her either and find her arrogant, pompous and it’s plain she holds a very high opinion of herself.
Not good to compare two completely different people. One is English another one is Austrian...for a start. Different looks different personalities, temperaments..... Shall we compare you and your neighbour. You know, I'm entitled to my opinion, I prefer your neighbour.... 😅😅😅
I like her. He comes off as aloof and creepy, which is weird considering his rank compared to his interviewee. I also like the fact that I can still slightly hear her Australian accent at the very start 😁
@@ozrob76 look again and try to think what he thinks with his expressions. He seems to think things like "wow she got so much but she's still super controlling something's bit off" eyes don't lie😝👍🏻
Honestly, I think what she said was accurate: Diana's left when she was just 6 years old, she had little formal education, and nearly non-existent support system.
Princess Michael was always in her best element as a business woman. She still decorated for people. She never really stopped it's just that the shop came down. She did up a big Russian Hotel. Princess Pushy has always hustled for her family and husband. She has had troubles with her mouth and some of her comments have been really absurd. Almost concocted to shock at times. That said she must had been bored to sobs in the Windsor world back in the day. Their lives terribly restricted.
Well in that case, William's real name is Gotha-Saxe-Coburg, and a total waste of space they are, the whole damn family, nothing to do, BUT look pretty, shake hands and plant the odd tree, and SHOP.
Michael Owen-lowe actually wrong, if our great monarchy had not changed their name during WWI to Windsor it would of changed upon the marriage of our Queen to Prince Philip to Mountbatten, as it is the male line grandchildren of the Queen and Duke do bare the name Mountbatten-Windsor.
Lots To Learn you do have lots to learn on this subject. They are indeed known as the Cambridges, hence why the children are Prince George of Cambridge and Princess Charlotte of Cambridge. Their last name is Mountbatten-Windsor as can be seen in the legal papers they filed in France. Finally, they are of the House of Windsor. Look it up.
Re the catholic marrying into the royal family rule it is fine for a member of the royal family to fall in love and marry a catholic of course it is. However the rule of thumb is that the royal renounces their right of succession. Interesting that she didn't mention her first husband Tom who was probably at work during the salad and pahsta lunches.
She still has a bit of an Australian accent particularly obvious when she speaks words containing the letter "o". Eg when she says "scholars", "mother" and "historians".
@@RaymondHng She moved to Sydney as a baby (or the age of six according to other sources) with her mother and brother after her parents divorced. She attended Convent of the Sacred Heart in Sydney's Rose Bay and left Australia in her late teens.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for posting entire interview. I could listen to her for hours,she is knowledgable, perfect diction and lovely to look at. She also has a warm personality.
Such a charming. witty, humorous and highly intelligent Princess. She has been a wonderful wife for Prince Michael and a beautiful mother to her two children.
What a refreshing interview of truth, heritage and wisdom from the cherished past.
That will forever be immortalised as a treasured iconic recollection, that dances in this remarkable Lady's eyes.
What a delicious interview! Love the banter between these two..... thank you for sharing
I imagine Princess Michael of Kent would be very popular Dinner guest, as would Conrad Black. Very engaging, thankyou
Do you think she'd wear her father's Swastika armband to that dinner party?
I attended a fundraiser dinner at the Savoy and sat on her table she was utterly Charming and Engaging and i won the first prize from the Tombola and she handed me my Prize... She pulled me in to Kiss my cheek...She smelt...amazing.
@@SenorSolNo but Harry would.
@@kevinlongman007they're all the same
You really thing she'd invite you?
Princess Michael of Kent shines like a brilliant gem!
You can see that Princesse Michael has an Austrian aristocratic background herself. That specific timeless lady charme, manners and posture only develop in old families with a long tradition of education and manners. I like her and her toughness covered in smile…
No. Not Austrian, his father was German and her mother Hungarian.
Her father was ss member
@@krishnavyas313…. Yes! and as I recall she spent much of her youth in Sydney, went to Kincoppel convent at Rose Bay in Sydney’s eastern suburbs and her mother was a hairdresser … this was reported at the time of her marriage in the tabloids… I’am a Sydney person but was in London at the time…she fosters the grand image… less is more😊
Charm and manners? Try racism and bigotry.
@@krishnavyas313who cares.
VERY FASCINATING PRINCESS MICHAEL OF KENT . VERY ARTICULATED, SO BEAUTIFUL AND SO REGAL . I USE TO ADMIRE HER WHEN I FIRST SAW HER IN THE NEWSPAPER . YES , SHE IS REALLY CLASSY . VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE AND SPEAKS BEAUTIFULLY . I HOPE SHE RECOVER FULLY FROM COVID . GOD BLESS HER .
Such a very delightful guest!! Thank you, Conrad, for your surprising and most entertaining Princess of Kent! I so enjoyed the warmth and enthusiasm during your conversation! We need more of the same!
Princess Michael of Kent, is graceful, warm and intelligent
For an SS officer's daughter!
@@SenorSol How might that reflect on her?
@@deanedge5988 Errr...her attitudes towards race?? She's on record as having abused some African-American women in a restaurant!
All royals are 3v!l Time for them to go to their own planet.
@@SenorSolridiculous and inappropriate comment
She is very elegant... I love listening to her ...
I love her voice x
I’ve got these books. She’s actually a very good writer and they are very enjoyable to read indeed!
Interesting & insightful, lovely to listen....History (ALL) nations....colours & creed, never boring....thank you. :)
She is quite fascinating to look at and listen to.
I thorrowly enjoyed this conversation! Both very interesting people with lots of historic knowledge! Thank you for it.
"Thorrowly"??? What?
Oh wow, Princess Michael is amazing. What grace and intelligence.
Fascinating interview! The books sound marvelous!
PRINCESS MARIE CHRISTINE IS SUCH AN INTELLIGENT; ELEGANT; CLASSY LADY !
No.
@@SarahJones-i2q THE NO SEEMS TO REFER TO YOU BEING INTELLIGENT; ELEGANT; CLASSY !🤥
@@ChristianDominicWindsor Yes.
@@SarahJones-i2q... Where is your perspective and reasoning.
Princess Michael.
Such a beautiful intelligent lady. She is so elegant and a modern lady refreshing in the royal family..
Thank you for posting this video . I have been looking for this video forever
What a lovely voice she has.Lovely to hear her speak.And loyal keeping her counsel on the current Royals.
What a delight, Princess Michael is so well-read, articulate and interesting. Though I think he's capable of much better, I found Black to be unfocused and awkward.
Enjoyed this.
Absolutely love this Royal Lady.
Enjoyed listening to her, I think she's received very unfair press in the past.
What a striking woman. Very attractive character.
A very interesting interview, a charming and beautiful lady, and a perfect wife for a prince.
Yup!
Indeed
Born to.
She used to be called Princess Pushy back then. Glamorous stylish member of the RF and still holds her own
The Princess Pushy label was cruel and totally uncalled for, but as a strong intelligent and beautiful woman she was seen as a threat to the popularity of established Windsor Royals.
Meghan all over. But the problem Meghan has is being half
It is said thst the later queen said princess m was ‘ far too grand for the likes of us’.
@@MsCarlota19 she wasn't easily intimidated.
A snowflake she was not. It is important to make that clear.
@@MsCarlota19 not so much a threat moreover a reason to recognise the royalty of her lineage.
She was a complete thoroughbred.
Princess Michael is a darling, very classy lady, reminds me of my childhood in London, Conrad always reserved and a latent Brit..i owe you that beer..!
Princess Michael seems like she would be easy to talk to about most anything historical that has to do with aristocracies.
A lovely sincere intelligent and beautiful woman. Thanks. More please
forceful, intelligent and beautiful a woman of considerable worth
She is an Interesting Character!
❤️, she’s absolutely wonderful. I adore PMoK
Me too!!! Moi aussi!!!💕💕💕
Love her class and style.
She’s better dressed than Camilla lol 😂 😂😂😂😂
Don't forget her racism too😊
@@steve5693 shut the fuck up dickhead
@@steve5693
So what!! I don't like your us well!
omg yes@@thebeardedwondercorbin8058
I like Princess Michael of Kent.
Princess Michael of Kent is lovely, gracious and smart!
A true Princess.....a beautiful, spirited, gifted Soul!
No actually a princess by marriage only !
@@rosehickey8483 She has ABSOLUTE CLASS, like a Number of Royals, Unlike the second rate actress Meghan Markle!!!
@@MaverickSeventySeven anyone compared to Harkle would appear regal and dignified.......! ! !
@@rosehickey8483 For you information in the Uk it just one title ! Princess of The United Kingdom of Grait Britain and Northern Ireland. This title is divided in two groups Princess By Brith and Princess by Marriage ! All of them are Princesses ! The rule to use the title is this : when a British prince marries, his wife also becomes a BRITISH PRINCESS by law adquiring the title Princess of The United Kigdom of Grait Britain of Northern Ireland ; however, she is addressed by the feminine version of the husband's senior title on his behalf, either a princely title or a peerage. Traditionally, all wives of male members of the British royal family, the aristocracy, and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. An example of this case is Princess Michael of Kent, the wife of the King's first cousin once removed, Prince Michael of Kent. This happened because any women who married in the Uk adquire the name of their husbans ! Example if Mr Michael Windsor marriage Ms Lucy Davies, she becomes MRS Michael Windsor, other example if Lord Nicholas Thompson marriage Annie Thmpson , she becomes Lady Nicholas Thompson.
There is also the case when a princess of blood royal marries a British prince. She also becomes a princess by marriage and will be addressed in the same way. An example of this situation was the late Princess Alexandra, Duchess of Fife: when she married the cousin of her mother, Prince Arthur of Connaught, she became Princess Arthur of Connaught, Duchess of Fife. Another example the late HRH The Princess Beatrice the daughter of Queen Vitoria when she married HRH Prince Henry of Battenberg she becomes HRH Princess Henry of Battenberg NOT Princess Beatrice of Battenberg.
If a British prince has a peerage, then the Princess is addressed by the feminine version of her husband's peer title; an example of this case is the wife of Prince William, who was (briefly) officially styled His Royal Highness The Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge while his wife Catherine became Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, omitting both the 'prince' and 'princess' titles and their first names. When William was then created Prince of Wales, that became the senior title held in his own right, and he and Catherine are styled His/Her Royal Highness The Prince/Princess of Wales.
This does not mean that if you said The duchess of Sussex , The Duchess of Edinburgh , The Duchess of Kent , The Duchess of Gloucester are Not princesses! They are because they are all wives of a British Prince !
For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign.
Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
She's elegant, very intelligent, well read talented and more genuinely Royal in terms of her ancestry than the Windsors. When she married the Queen's cousin (prince Micheal of Kent) the Media predictably accused her of being "haughty" and failed to recognise what a wonderful asset she would be to the rather dull Windsors! She is far better educated than all the other Royal women of her generation or older, and her beauty and accomplishments apparently caused jealousy and insecurity among some senior members in the family....notably princess Margaret who was openly spiteful about the glamorous newcomer.
Even the Queen unfortunately was intimidated by Marie and remarked how " grand" she was. Sadly this pattern of disparaging new Royal brides continues to this day in the UK Media.
Sorry but I doubt Margaret gave two hoots about who her cousin married. She was a Princess of England in her own right, and higher rank. Margaret was fun to be around and had enough of a following.
@@alphabet_soup123 Princess Margaret stated very clearly that she would not acknowledge Princess Michael unless she converted to the Church of England. She was very insecure in her later years because she was no longer a senior member of the family with Princess Diana and then William and Harry in the news everyday so she always had to remind everyone that she was the Queens sister and would be your friend one day and then totally ignore you the next.She delighted in making people uncomfortable.
@@alphabet_soup123 I'm just going on what I have read over the years and from collecting data over the years on the family. Her son David had also insulted Princess Michael and when the Queen learnt of this she instructed David to apologise immediately.
Best example of PRIVATE life and stll live as ROYALTY princesls michael of kent
A princess with utter class!
Bravo !
Shut up
She is such an elegant and fabulous lady.
I could listen to HRH Princess Michael of Kent all day.
My, gosh, she’s splendid! Catnip for every man! She arouses all my inner urges, even at her age. The epitome of the kind of woman men are willing to do anything for - to overlook every peccadillo and flaw - just to squire around on our arms! My goodness, Prince Michael won himself a prize! Intelligent, delicious in appearance, witty, coquettish and divine. I have always heard of the extended Royal Family’s disdain for her, and now I understand why. She outshines every one of them! Methinks I’m in love. Princess Michael, how may I serve you? Thanks for the fine interview!
my proud Princess Marie Christine i want read the book ...very inteligent Princess one most of i see in my all life...
Two charming people!
She's a very elegant, likeable woman.
@s b They know & that's why they like people like her.
s b her father might have been but that shouldn’t define her
She is a total racist. It's not just one incident -- it's a string of them through the years. She genuinely believes people from "good" lineage are better people than any others.
She looks very elegant like royal women in one of those old paintings
She’s lovely.
Tallest woman who married into the Royal family...
@@gw437 6 feet 0 inches.
@Eison Wi鄭子維 👍🏻Thank you 🙏🏻 for the information. I didn’t know she is so tall
@@Greatnews4me2 kk8’8
Love her!
How strong she is as wife, she can use her name as HRH The Princess Michael of Kent as HRH The Prince of Michael of Kent's wife.
She perfoms very little official royal duties....or charity work. Herself and husband lived in tax payer funded accomidation at kensigton palace .
@@rosehickey8483 They pay market rates now. The Queen used to pay their rent, but there came a point where they were told to pay up themselves. Prince Michael does not get a Civil List allowance, and the Queen paid up because they did some Royal duties.
Good heaven. What a splendid lady. Perfect abilities of.expression and facts et al.
Im not saying she is the most beautiful woman in the world. Im just sayn. After 20 minutes I fell in love with her. I can forgive her for her slight of Nixon who I love just a bit more dearly !
Do you know guys that HRH Princess Michael of Kent and HRH The Princess of Wales are the only two British Princess by Marriage that can use the title Princess as Form of Address ! This is in the first case because Prince Michael the husband of Princess Michael do not has a PERAGE TITLE, in the second case , is because William became HRH The Prince of Wales and this title became the highest title in behalf so her wife became HRH The Princess of Wales !
This does not mean that if you said The duchess of Sussex , The Duchess of Edinburgh , The Duchess of Kent , The Duchess of Gloucester are Not princesses! They are because they are all wives of a British Prince !
The Rule to use the title as form of address is the following in the Uk it just one title ! Princess of The United Kingdom of Grait Britain and Northern Ireland. This title is divided in two groups Princess By Brith and Princess by Marriage ! All of them are Princesses ! The rule to use the title is this : when a British prince marries, his wife also becomes a BRITISH PRINCESS by law adquiring the title Princess of The United Kigdom of Grait Britain of Northern Ireland ; however, she is addressed by the feminine version of the husband's senior title on his behalf, either a princely title or a peerage. Traditionally, all wives of male members of the British royal family, the aristocracy, and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. An example of this case is Princess Michael of Kent, the wife of the King's first cousin once removed, Prince Michael of Kent. This happened because any women who married in the Uk adquire the name of their husbans ! Example if Mr Michael Windsor marriage Ms Lucy Davies, she becomes MRS Michael Windsor, other example if Lord Nicholas Thompson marriage Annie Thmpson , she becomes Lady Nicholas Thompson.
There is also the case when a princess of blood royal marries a British prince. She also becomes a princess by marriage and will be addressed in the same way. An example of this situation was the late Princess Alexandra, Duchess of Fife: when she married the cousin of her mother, Prince Arthur of Connaught, she became Princess Arthur of Connaught, Duchess of Fife. Another example the late HRH The Princess Beatrice the daughter of Queen Vitoria when she married HRH Prince Henry of Battenberg she becomes HRH Princess Henry of Battenberg NOT Princess Beatrice of Battenberg.
If a British prince has a peerage, then the Princess is addressed by the feminine version of her husband's peer title; an example of this case is the wife of Prince William, who was (briefly) officially styled His Royal Highness The Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge while his wife Catherine became Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, omitting both the 'prince' and 'princess' titles and their first names. When William was then created Prince of Wales, that became the senior title held in his own right, and he and Catherine are styled His/Her Royal Highness The Prince/Princess of Wales.
For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign.
Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
For example if the late Queen does not gave Harry the titles Duke of Sussex , Earl Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel , They would be Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry. With the “The” capitalized as they are the son and daughter in law of the sovereign.
Meghan Markle is what Harry is a Princess a Duchess a Countess and a Baroness
“Her wife”? Really?
Beside everything positive being said in the comment section I would like to mention that she has the most beautiful hair! Amazing.
The princess is very beautiful
Beautiful woman … great bones!
Beautiful woman.
She came to England to hook a royal and once she meet Prince Michael she stalked him everywhere. I know another ex aristocrat from Austria who tried many times in England but not successful. She is not so cunning and shrewd like this one.
And what and who “another one do “ you know?
Such an interesting, intelligent and engaging woman. And a woman after my own heart: lover of felines.
"Yolande. The Queen of Four Kingdoms."👑👑👑👑
Nice!
Nice lady very charming.
Yes, must be said she IS a beautiful woman. Educated, chic, talented but oh so vain and affected. Perhaps the two go together.
Please note she want called ‘Princess pushy’ for nothing. Better educated than all the RF and speaks several languages - she
did it all HER way.
Maybe “ she wantS”?
What a charismatic woman!
The interviewer was uninterested in her book, he was more into the gossip of the royals. Also, he seems does not like her at all. The princess was so jolly for the interview
Like father like daughter.
People are so ridiculous... my mother had a blackamoor pin... my sister had blackamoor artwork in her bedroom... I knew of some millionaires who spent a fortune on very antique chandeliers that had blackamoors in them .
The political correctness thing has become so insane and twisted that just showing an image of anything different is considered prejudice .
If you wore a t-shirt with a black person on it does that make you prejudice ?
you’re weird. you find an excuse for racists
@@danielwatson743 actually it's the people who think everyone is a racist that are weird .
Blackamoor art was and has been highly revered for a long time ... of course God forbid someone should make artwork or any kind of icons out of a black person right ? Please get educated
How are we even seeing these comments since the video has been taken down and the comment section is closed and yet here I am still getting comments
@@danielwatson743 I've also had Native American art and images in my home and jewelry and I guess that makes me prejudice against them also haha
@@danielwatson743
People like you make me consider to be a racist!!!
Princess Michael is vibrant, intelligent and loyal. It is a pity she hasn't played more of a central role in the public affairs of the Royal Family.
Omg what a Beautiful Woman
Such a lpvely,beautiful lady.
One gets the impression that she really wants everyone to care, but the reality is that no one is interested. Minor, forgettable "royalty". Sorry, but insignificant.
She seems like a perfectly lovely woman all of those stupid rumours seem to be nothing but exaggerations of a woman just having some fun.
I'm entitled to my opinion. I don't like her very much. Full of bull. If you want class watch the views of the Duchess of Kent. Now, there's class.
you most certainly are entitled to your opinion. I don’t like her either and find her arrogant, pompous and it’s plain she holds a very high opinion of herself.
Not good to compare two completely different people. One is English another one is Austrian...for a start. Different looks different personalities, temperaments..... Shall we compare you and your neighbour. You know, I'm entitled to my opinion, I prefer your neighbour.... 😅😅😅
I like her. He comes off as aloof and creepy, which is weird considering his rank compared to his interviewee. I also like the fact that I can still slightly hear her Australian accent at the very start 😁
Austrian!
@@BlueInk912 "Austrian eh? Crikey! Throw another shrimp on the barbie mate"
I'm reading his eyes and they tell "this woman is so unhappy I've never seen a narcissist like her type"
@@whitelightsheddinweedsmokin Really? You got that from his eyes? lol 😳😟 Unhappy?.... 🤷🏻♂️
@@ozrob76 look again and try to think what he thinks with his expressions. He seems to think things like "wow she got so much but she's still super controlling something's bit off" eyes don't lie😝👍🏻
06:07 - Princesse Machiavelli 🚨
Damn Diana with faint praise. Then twist the 🔪 while smiling benignly.
Honestly, I think what she said was accurate: Diana's left when she was just 6 years old, she had little formal education, and nearly non-existent support system.
She was at the funeral of Philipp
Back stabber, she HATED DI & vice verca. She seems a nightmare. Oh standards and the Royal Family contrived madam
Her mother in law the previous duchess of Kent was the first princess Diana before Diana
Her mother in law was Princess Marina
@@shiranipathiratne749 no she wasn't!
@@kevinlongman007 YES, SHE. WAS.
@@VLind-uk6mb no her mother in law was Princess Marina as somebody else has already pointed out. 🤦♂️
@@kevinlongman007 That is exactly what I was saying. I am perfectly well aware of the Kent family genealogy.
I’m glad she never gave up her catholic faith. ❤
Lovely lady
Who lives in America and will be there for Christmas? Who is she referring to in this interview with the Journalist gentleman.?
Princess Michael was always in her best element as a business woman. She still decorated for people. She never really stopped it's just that the shop came down. She did up a big Russian Hotel. Princess Pushy has always hustled for her family and husband. She has had troubles with her mouth and some of her comments have been really absurd. Almost concocted to shock at times. That said she must had been bored to sobs in the Windsor world back in the day. Their lives terribly restricted.
Why do people without basic knowledge of English all of a sudden have become experts of the British Royal family?
This lady should be queen!! She is likable precisely because she is not woke!!
Conrad has a long suffering look on his face....
Yes, quite peculiar, creepy.
9 minutes: William & family are not "the Cambridges"; they're the Windsors. 'Cambridge' is their TITLE, not their Surname.
Well in that case, William's real name is Gotha-Saxe-Coburg, and a total waste of space they are, the whole damn family, nothing to do, BUT look pretty, shake hands and plant the odd tree, and SHOP.
Michael Owen-lowe actually wrong, if our great monarchy had not changed their name during WWI to Windsor it would of changed upon the marriage of our Queen to Prince Philip to Mountbatten, as it is the male line grandchildren of the Queen and Duke do bare the name Mountbatten-Windsor.
Lots To Learn you do have lots to learn on this subject. They are indeed known as the Cambridges, hence why the children are Prince George of Cambridge and Princess Charlotte of Cambridge. Their last name is Mountbatten-Windsor as can be seen in the legal papers they filed in France. Finally, they are of the House of Windsor. Look it up.
William and Harry use the patronymic "Wales." The are in the House of Windsor, now Mountbatten-Windsor (which is a little bit of BS).
Jane Smith :
Yes, OF Cambridge.
Your comment doesn't contradict my initial remark; it confirms it.
She speaks with a South African accent
Isn’t she wonderful
Her dad was in the SS.
Conrad is only here to talk and listen to nobody. Horrible interviewer
He is a sycophant - clearly in awe of being in the presence of a royal princess, although only by birth.
You mean only by marriage?
I don't see that at all. Just a typical interviewer who knows the interviewee. Perhaps you are jealous.
There is a familiar look about this great beauty- similiarvto Cate Blanchett....stunning yet accessible
I doubt you would find her very accessible if you were to meet her.
A kind of ‘posh’ sound that you don’t hear a lot nowadays
Re the catholic marrying into the royal family rule it is fine for a member of the royal family to fall in love and marry a catholic of course it is. However the rule of thumb is that the royal renounces their right of succession. Interesting that she didn't mention her first husband Tom who was probably at work during the salad and pahsta lunches.
She still has a bit of an Australian accent particularly obvious when she speaks words containing the letter "o". Eg when she says "scholars", "mother" and "historians".
Don't you mean "Austrian"?
@@RaymondHng She moved to Sydney as a baby (or the age of six according to other sources) with her mother and brother after her parents divorced. She attended Convent of the Sacred Heart in Sydney's Rose Bay and left Australia in her late teens.
I have just fallen in love 😍
very different from what I expected…in a good way.
A fascinating woman. Queen Elizabeth ll was somewhat intimidated by her intelligence.
and her education. None of the Windsors have an education to speak of.
Some members of society have a few interesting stories about this lady .....
One was that she would open a garage in Luton if a free meal went along with it.