I watched this on a tiny tv with my dad, who was born in 1907. He was enthralled, and told me he saw an automobile for the first time when he was 19 years old and was fascinated with the changes in the world.💜💜💜
Well the world was lied to on this day 54 years ago because we didn’t go to the moon. They filmed it in a studio. You can thank Stanley Kubrick for that failed production that has been picked apart and dissected to the point there is absolutely no question that this was a massive lie and people I cannot believe still do not know.
@@darkentity5443 . You do what most every conspiracy theorist always does when you’re shown to be wrong. You ignore the fact that you were wrong, and then pivot and change the goalposts. Is it your lack of self-awareness which makes you do it so shamelessly or is it your lack of care about intellectual honesty? Now you’ve changed the question and moved the goalposts, let’s address that one instead? Do you for some reason feel the need for the US to fund and repeat the original Apollo program missions? Wasn’t 14 missions and 6 landings enough for you? Artemis is a different program.
@@tubecated_development I find it pretty odd we had the funding to go 7 times in a 10 years and now we haven’t gone back even one in the past 40 years. I also think it’s pretty strange that nasa is currently working on getting people past the earths ozone layer without being burned alive by van Allen radiation belts. Funny. I could’ve sworn we did that 50 years ago.
Firstly the Apollo 11 Westinghouse TV camera had a mass of just over 2kg and its weight on the moon would only be 1/6 of its weight on Earth. Secondly, there was no camera man as the TV camera was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. Take care.
@@drawaisurrehman296 Thank you for your comment. My comment was a direct response point out the errors and incorrect assumptions of the original poster. Is anything that I have written non-factual? Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthand the thousands of photos taken on thr Moon with Hasselblad cameras? Explain to me please how the film wasn’t destroyed with such extreme high and low temperatures? Don’t even think about lying with some “they we’re specially designed” BS. Both Hasselblad and Kodak confirmed their equipment was not altered in any way.
Such an amazing man. Wish I could go to the moon and walk. My oldest son is an 😇 in heaven and he use to tell me, momma I love you too the moon and back....Neil Armstrong is a hero....my oldest son was mine...I miss my big baby boy soooooo much...
I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ🇳🇿 in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed.. RIP Neil Armstrong🚀👍
And you actually believed ppl that worked for the US GOVERNMENT... 🤣🤣 obama & Trump can speak for hours on end too. Would you believe everything _they_ say? 😂😂
The camera was stowed in an instrument pallet known as the MESA (Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly) in the LM descent stage. The MESA was to the left of the ladder as viewed from the front of the LM. When Armstrong was at the top of the ladder, he pulled a lanyard to swing open the MESA, which was hinged at the bottom. The TV camera, which was attached to it, would also swing down. It was mounted upside-down so as to secure it firmly to the MESA with vibration isolators and to also simplify its removal by the astronaut. Aldrin then switched on the camera by pushing in the TV circuit breaker in the cabin of the LM. The camera was pointing at the ladder of the LM, so that TV pictures of Armstrong's initial steps on the Moon could be relayed to the world. Later, after Aldrin had descended to the surface, Armstrong mounted the TV camera on a tripod, and placed it some 10 metres from the LM. The camera was left unattended to cover the crew's activities during the remainder of the moonwalk.
@@rangerbuckley9174 there was only one tv camera filming Neil coming down. I don’t know what footage you are refering to. There’s also 16mm footage from Buzz’s camera which is in great quality.
“The camera was stowed in an instrument pallet known as the MESA (Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly) in the LM descent stage. The MESA was to the left of the ladder as viewed from the front of the LM. When Armstrong was at the top of the ladder, he pulled a lanyard to swing open the MESA, which was hinged at the bottom. The TV camera, which was attached to it, would also swing down. It was mounted upside-down so as to secure it firmly to the MESA with vibration isolators and to also simplify its removal by the astronaut. Aldrin then switched on the camera by pushing in the TV circuit breaker in the cabin of the LM. The camera was pointing at the ladder of the LM, so that TV pictures of Armstrong's initial steps on the Moon could be relayed to the world. Later, after Aldrin had descended to the surface, Armstrong mounted the TV camera on a tripod, and placed it some 10 metres (33 feet) from the LM. The camera was left unattended to cover the crew's activities during the remainder of the moonwalk.”
Yeah. CAUSE ITS REAL!!!! People died trying to get to the moon, now that thousands of the smartest people (smarter than you) have been able to get people on the moon.. you a dishonering the astronauts who died
@@xXStarfireXx who all died trying to get to the moon? No one. People have died from re entry. Apollo 1 caught on fire before it even took off. No one has ever died trying to go to the moon, because they never actually tried to go to the moon.
@@xXStarfireXx nobody has died on the way to the moon. People have died from re entry and explosions. Not a single person has ever died trying to get to the moon. Apollo 1 caught fire before even taking off.
@@xXStarfireXx who died on the way to the moon? Who actually died in space while going to the moon? Astronauts have died upon re entry and take off. No astronaut has ever actually died in space, except for the soyuz 11 crew, who died while preparing to re enter Earths atmosphere
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
The movement of the flag is really a ting, i mean besides from the fact there is no wind in the moon, the movement pattern is clearly the same pattern that you can observe on a flag moved by the wind or a blower. Even if people try to argue that the movement is caused by the astronaut holding the flag, we can clearly see that the astronaut is holding the flag on one side, and the way the flag is winding on the other extreme requires a force applied there, and the pattern of movement shows clearly that it is a turbulent movement, the only two thing that can cause that turbulent movement apart from liquids is the air
The Apollo 11 flag moves when the astronauts are assembling, moving it and adding energy to it and stops when they stop moving it. The flag had a pole cross the top to make it appear like it was flying as if on Earth. It oscillates when moved as it gains energy but can not dissipate that energy easily as there is no air in a vacuum to remove energy and dampen the oscillations. The entire flag assembly and Buzz Aldrin salute was filmed using the 16mm camera and is easily found online: eg: "Apollo 11 - 16mm magazine 1094-K" on the YT channel "Apollo 11 - Apollo Flight Journal". You will clearly that the flag behaves exactly as it should in a low gravity, zero atmospheric resistance environment and that it stops moving when that astronauts stop touching it. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth i understand that principle but it still does not explain the regime of the movement. Thats my main argument. If you move an object in vacune conditions, the movement will be predictable. And i can argue that not just predictable, but also laminar, thats water does not flow in space even if you apply a force on firs place. All the molecules of the water will move with a speed an a direction that should not be changing along the way unless you stir it up. Anyway there is lot to discuss.
@@jaylooppworld381 Thank you for your reply. All 5 Apollo landing flags (I am leaving out Apollo 12 flag as it did not have a cross pole) behaved in the same way. They flapped when the astronauts moved them and stopped moving when the astronauts went away. It is really that simple. Take care.
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
It’s simple. There are enough billionaires out there and I would imagine that someone would spit the money out just for an instagram shot 🤷♂️ my opinion. We have not been through the van Allen belt . That’s the first thing we have to be able to tackle
Funny, Dr. James Van Allen totally disagrees with you and advise NASA on how to pass through the belts which are named after him. I think that I will go with his opinion! Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth The FACT than Van Allen HIMSELF did NOT travel through them, let's me know that he and you are completely wrong. 😂🤣 Maybe YOU traveled through them... 🤣🤣 (🤡!)
@@LuanChuppi So in your own head you actually think that you know more about the Van Allen Belts than Dr. James Van Allen himself......When in reality you do not even seem to know that there are more than one belts.......The Dunning Kruger is strong in you! Take care.
@@user-ly5de8sp2jSo you trust conspiracy theorists more than physicists? You do realise that if it were fake, some physicists would have debunked it. Not all of them are sponsored by the government.
2024 here , 20th June --> we supposed of went to moon . As I speak the Boeing Spaceliner cannot return as yet ??? But !! … 50 years ago we talked to humans and went to the moon ???
The filming of Armstrong 's first steps on the lunar surface (Apollo 11 Mission) was achieved with a Westinghouse TV camera which was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. The signal was transmitted to Earth where the recording took place. Shortly afterwards Armstrong moved this camera a short distance from the LM and mounted it on a tripod facing the LM. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth So, some company developed a camera with a technology to support a voyage of 4 days in space, subject to extreme temperatures, speed, humidity, barometric pressure close to zero, fifty years ago in order to, what? 3 seconds of film? Do you think that part of the whole project would be relevant? Or was it just to show off? Since when science privileges image over logic?
@@paulocoutinho9133 (1) "some company developed a camera". The Apollo cameras were designed and manufactured by a range of companies including Hasselblad, Westinghouse and Maurer. (2) "a voyage of 4 days in space"......In total the Apollo Program accounted for more than 100 days of manned spaceflight. (3) "3 seconds of film?"......There are many hundreds of hours of footage from the Apollo Program, from the Westinghouse TV camera as well as from the 16mm cameras. All of this along with the thousands of mission photographs and hundreds of hours of audio is available in the National Archives ad well on various NASA historical websites. To be honest, from start to finish you do not seem to have much knowledge of the Apollo Program so keep studying. Take care.
@@paulocoutinho9133Many people at NASA actually fought against the use of cameras since it was primarily a scientific mission, and cameras wouldn’t add any additional benefit.
@@myles_bennett77 Only the images did. They inspired the next couple of generations of astronauts to become astronauts. And not just in the US. Not to mention tons of support people and shuttle designers and people going into astronomy and engineers ...
Do you know what happened when nasa put a man in a space suit in a vacuum chamber? He passed out instantly and almost died after less that 3 seconds! That was after the moon landing hoax was over.
@@amiigoseif it was faked, then why did the Soviets and Chinese say it’s real? They had satellites orbiting the moon (Soviets in the mid 60’s, Chinese in the mid 2000 and 2010’s) and if it was faked, they wouldn’t have seen a lander and would have called the US out on a lie. They never did. India also saw the landers and rovers with their satellites and Japan even did a 3d topographical render of Apollo 15’s landing site and when they compared it to pictures taken, the ground, valley and hills was a perfect match.
is there any footage from inside the apollo 11 showing the full picture of the moon? i mean why there was only footage landing? the should make a record while they were orbiting the earth and the moon
The sheer amount of time and money spent on the programs, especially with Gemini and in the early stages of Apollo, is just too ludicrous for it to be faked. 3 astronauts were also killed in a flash fire on the ground during a test run of the Apollo spacecraft. Their sacrifices nearly costed us the entire program. But it was because of them that we made the command module safer. There were also 7 more flights, 4 of which were manned, launched to prepare for the landing. Apollo 4 and 6 tested the Saturn V, Apollo 5 tested the LM in an unmanned orbital test, Apollo 7 tested the orbital capabilities of the Command Module, Apollo 8 was the first to do a fly by of the Moon, Apollo 9 did a manned test of the CSM and the LM together, Apollo 10 was a full dress rehearsal for the landing, going 9 miles above the surface. All of this was in preparation for Apollo 11, which would land Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the lunar surface.
one small step for man one giant leap for mankind means don't go back. The lunar lander batteries were not charged Mankind has no business in outer space We stand on the most unique chunk of rock in all of existence
Imagine thinking the moon landing is fake like ever heard of Apollo 13 and 1 💀 and the fact you don’t even know anything about the mission it’s self is just sad. Either what we’re going back.
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
After that they released the some videos which they got from Australia. They relied it from australia only nasa told but we never know. I dont believe Armstrong land in moon
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
The filming of Armstrong 's first steps on the lunar surface (Apollo 11 Mission) was achieved with a Westinghouse TV camera which was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA and turned the camera on. The signal was transmitted to Earth where the recording took place. Shortly afterwards Armstrong moved this camera a short distance from the LM and mounted it on a tripod facing the LM. Take care.
It's called Apollo 11. This is the time where all the Gold is being used up that's why they had to discontinue the Bretton Woods agreement. Since then, money has been printed out of thin air.
nah but imagine he said that and then accidentally just fell out of the rocket, or if one of the people in the rocket just pushed him aside and jumped out and went like “YEA GUYS ITS ME, IM ON THE MOON YALL NOT NEIL!”
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
@@geocooley7282 Why does someone have to have 'shot' it? If you wanted to film the first step of a human being onto the Moon, are you telling us that you can't think of a simple way of doing it? Really??
@@jollybeans106the actual quote is “One small step for A man, one giant step for for mankind” His accent made it sound like “for man”. One small step for man (mankind), one giant leap for mankind doesn’t really make sense
I'm not sure the details, but it has to do with the image being burned into the low-quality camera after staring at it for a long time and taking a long time for the image to clear, kind of like how old CRT monitors would burn the image into the screen if you left them on without a screensaver. There's a spot about 20-30 minutes into the footage where the camera gets shifted and you can see two horizons for about 10 seconds.
So you're telling me that they managed to pull it off in 1969 but they have never attempted in 2010s or 2020s with a much more advanced technology and the possibility to take clear footage? I ain't buying it.
You do understand that moon mission faced major criticism and leaders were even cancelled later , doing jt today woukd at least charge a near total of $150 Billion Dollars
@@Lor_Duck There was no LRV taken on the Apollo 11,12, 14 landings. The LRV was on the 15, 16, 17 landings. The footage of Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface was taken with the Westinghouse TV camera attached to the LM. Take care.
If it was faked, the Soviets would have said it was faked, but they never did. Instead they said the US unnecessarily risked human life to land a man on the moon and that the Soviets was never going to land a man on the moon, despite the Soviets also making a moon rocket and lander at the same time as the Saturn-V called the N1, failing all 4 times it launched unmanned. This is real
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth we can’t make it past the van Allen radiation belts as of today. Which means we couldn’t have done it 50 years ago. There’s your evidence. *take care.*
@@darkentity5443 Whoever has told you that " we can’t make it past the van Allen radiation belts as of today" has seriously misinformed you. No such comment was ever made and NASA nor any other space agency think this. Your misunderstanding is not evidence. Take care.
If NASA was able to do it years ago where technology was not that advanced and they were able to land real people on the moon, in space, and in a very one in a million possibilities of taking those men back alive on Earth, why can't they do it again today where every technology is in another level of advancement?
It has nothing to do with technology, it's about budget cuts and politics. NASA doesn't even have close to the budget it had in 1969. Adjusted for inflation, NASA's budget in 1969 was over 170 billion dollars, which is way more than the 25 billion dollars they have today. Also it's mostly just computers that have advanced a lot since the Apollo program. Most of the cost in a space program comes from the cost of building these rockets, not the computers that control them. It's the same reason cars are still expensive even with more advanced computers. You still have to pay for the engine, plumbing, materials, and labor costs. In spite of all that, NASA is actually going back to the moon this next year. Look up project Artemis and you'll see what I mean
pareidolia /păr″ī-dō′lē-ə/ noun The perception of a recognizable image or meaningful pattern where none exists or is intended, as the perception of a face in the surface features of the moon. The tendency to interpret a vague stimulus as something known to the observer, such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals, seeing shapes in clouds, or hearing hidden messages in music.
@@Captain_Obvious69420 no I said just because someone is doesn't mean they are wrong and just because people see faces in things doesn't mean they are not there..look at the Helmut for yourself
These people in this comment section are real jokes first they say the who recorded it and when they realize that a person doesn't always have to carry it and there's camera holders they spewt out debunked "PROOF" they have but no matter what they will always think there smarter than the nasa scientist, mathematicians and astronauts that performed the calculations engineering necessary for space travel but in reality they just failed to get a kindergarten education.
I watched this on a tiny tv with my dad, who was born in 1907. He was enthralled, and told me he saw an automobile for the first time when he was 19 years old and was fascinated with the changes in the world.💜💜💜
Well the world was lied to on this day 54 years ago because we didn’t go to the moon. They filmed it in a studio. You can thank Stanley Kubrick for that failed production that has been picked apart and dissected to the point there is absolutely no question that this was a massive lie and people I cannot believe still do not know.
Your age
What's your age now??
@@munna_bhaiya_1272
Whats ur age
I loved this movie. It was great film incredible acting. I’m upset we haven’t gotten a sequel yet.
Why did you not watch the other five occasions?
@@tubecated_development well yea but it’s been almost 50 years since they dropped one. Maybe they should do a moon landing remastered next.
@@darkentity5443 . You do what most every conspiracy theorist always does when you’re shown to be wrong. You ignore the fact that you were wrong, and then pivot and change the goalposts. Is it your lack of self-awareness which makes you do it so shamelessly or is it your lack of care about intellectual honesty?
Now you’ve changed the question and moved the goalposts, let’s address that one instead? Do you for some reason feel the need for the US to fund and repeat the original Apollo program missions? Wasn’t 14 missions and 6 landings enough for you? Artemis is a different program.
Facts moon landing was fake
@@tubecated_development I find it pretty odd we had the funding to go 7 times in a 10 years and now we haven’t gone back even one in the past 40 years.
I also think it’s pretty strange that nasa is currently working on getting people past the earths ozone layer without being burned alive by van Allen radiation belts. Funny. I could’ve sworn we did that 50 years ago.
Fun fact: Everyone in Australia got to see it 1 second earlier
The Luck Of The Geography & The Signal Transmission
😢😢😢😢😢😢
Fun fact, they are the first to be duped😂
R.i.p that camera. It was left on the moon.
So true, camera mounts weren’t invented until 1970 🙄
Actually good question. Was the tv camera mounted to the descent stage?
@@shotparrot obviously
What he was left on the MOON!!! I NEVER KNOWN THAT!!!
Empty words
Im dyslexic i just looked at Neil Armstrongs name and instantly seen Mr Alien in it when I read it backwards
Neil.A
Alien. It’s a big talking point for conspiracy theorists
I want to thank the camera man for filming this. In the 1970s Film TV cameras were huge and heavy.
Firstly the Apollo 11 Westinghouse TV camera had a mass of just over 2kg and its weight on the moon would only be 1/6 of its weight on Earth. Secondly, there was no camera man as the TV camera was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth why are you giving explainations to something no one asked.
😂but since you said it, it must be true
@@drawaisurrehman296 Thank you for your comment. My comment was a direct response point out the errors and incorrect assumptions of the original poster. Is anything that I have written non-factual? Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthand the thousands of photos taken on thr
Moon with Hasselblad cameras? Explain to me please how the film wasn’t destroyed with such extreme high and low temperatures? Don’t even think about lying with some “they we’re specially designed” BS. Both Hasselblad and Kodak confirmed their equipment was not altered in any way.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthyou should just stop these people are so ignorant and naive to acknowledge your reply
The fact that they haven't been to the moon ever since shows me this was all an act just to beat the russians.
We didn’t go back cause we had no reason we beat Russia and got rocks and left that’s it
😂bad actors nasa is the biggest joke out there
How?
@@josipbilen-nc6glfootprints left on the moon are not compatible with the rocket suits presented after the landing.
@@arnold-do9ng they weared boot covers
@@arnold-do9ng simple answer
@@josipbilen-nc6gl no way, show me the model of that boot cover
Such an amazing man. Wish I could go to the moon and walk. My oldest son is an 😇 in heaven and he use to tell me, momma I love you too the moon and back....Neil Armstrong is a hero....my oldest son was mine...I miss my big baby boy soooooo much...
Wow...
I'm sorry for your loss
I'm sorry for your loss.
@@thekrabbypatty. 💕
This looks like my wife's ultrasound scan of our baby LOL
Yeah, kinda to be expected from an Lunar Orbiter, from the 60s
@@brox_guy4092
Yeah, especially when it's filmed in a sound stage by Stanley Kubrick.
I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ🇳🇿 in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed.. RIP Neil Armstrong🚀👍
And you actually believed ppl that worked for the US GOVERNMENT... 🤣🤣
obama & Trump can speak for hours on end too. Would you believe everything _they_ say? 😂😂
@@LuanChuppialso ain’t no way the so image pfp is talking
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The camera man was first on the moon?
Cameras do not need to be held and operated by a person.
The camera was stowed in an instrument pallet known as the MESA (Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly) in the LM descent stage. The MESA was to the left of the ladder as viewed from the front of the LM. When Armstrong was at the top of the ladder, he pulled a lanyard to swing open the MESA, which was hinged at the bottom. The TV camera, which was attached to it, would also swing down. It was mounted upside-down so as to secure it firmly to the MESA with vibration isolators and to also simplify its removal by the astronaut. Aldrin then switched on the camera by pushing in the TV circuit breaker in the cabin of the LM. The camera was pointing at the ladder of the LM, so that TV pictures of Armstrong's initial steps on the Moon could be relayed to the world. Later, after Aldrin had descended to the surface, Armstrong mounted the TV camera on a tripod, and placed it some 10 metres from the LM. The camera was left unattended to cover the crew's activities during the remainder of the moonwalk.
@@dansv1 not now in 2023 your right but in 1969 pretty sure they didn't have that yet
Landing Modules Cameras never exists?
@@chkeightzerofive 1954?
Me still admiring who is the camera man that steped on moon before neil Armstrong... 🤨
Eh? You do know the TV camera was folded out from the side of the lunar lander right? Just google it😅
@@TheHumanFly516how about the camera that filmed it about 20ft from the ship
@@rangerbuckley9174 there was only one tv camera filming Neil coming down. I don’t know what footage you are refering to. There’s also 16mm footage from Buzz’s camera which is in great quality.
@@rangerbuckley9174
After both astronauts were on the surface, Armstrong set the video camera up on a tripod.
“The camera was stowed in an instrument pallet known as the MESA (Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly) in the LM descent stage. The MESA was to the left of the ladder as viewed from the front of the LM. When Armstrong was at the top of the ladder, he pulled a lanyard to swing open the MESA, which was hinged at the bottom. The TV camera, which was attached to it, would also swing down. It was mounted upside-down so as to secure it firmly to the MESA with vibration isolators and to also simplify its removal by the astronaut. Aldrin then switched on the camera by pushing in the TV circuit breaker in the cabin of the LM. The camera was pointing at the ladder of the LM, so that TV pictures of Armstrong's initial steps on the Moon could be relayed to the world. Later, after Aldrin had descended to the surface, Armstrong mounted the TV camera on a tripod, and placed it some 10 metres (33 feet) from the LM. The camera was left unattended to cover the crew's activities during the remainder of the moonwalk.”
This is SO believable.
Yeah. CAUSE ITS REAL!!!! People died trying to get to the moon, now that thousands of the smartest people (smarter than you) have been able to get people on the moon.. you a dishonering the astronauts who died
@@xXStarfireXx who all died trying to get to the moon?
No one. People have died from re entry.
Apollo 1 caught on fire before it even took off.
No one has ever died trying to go to the moon, because they never actually tried to go to the moon.
@@xXStarfireXx nobody has died on the way to the moon. People have died from re entry and explosions. Not a single person has ever died trying to get to the moon.
Apollo 1 caught fire before even taking off.
@@xXStarfireXx who died on the way to the moon? Who actually died in space while going to the moon?
Astronauts have died upon re entry and take off. No astronaut has ever actually died in space, except for the soyuz 11 crew, who died while preparing to re enter Earths atmosphere
@@xXStarfireXx it's even more dishonoring to the astronauts who died by lying to the whole world.
Kubrick was a crazy mf
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Its littrely fake!. How does the flag is moving
If you, Hold up an flag, while theres bo wind, during your Arm moving, the kinetic energy will move the flag
Thats how it did
@@brox_guy4092 Exactly, another thing is that there was an extra pole to hold it upright, you can see that on the top of the flag.
Stanley Kubrick was a genius, really
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
🎯
The man who destroyed Soviet Union alone.
The movement of the flag is really a ting, i mean besides from the fact there is no wind in the moon, the movement pattern is clearly the same pattern that you can observe on a flag moved by the wind or a blower. Even if people try to argue that the movement is caused by the astronaut holding the flag, we can clearly see that the astronaut is holding the flag on one side, and the way the flag is winding on the other extreme requires a force applied there, and the pattern of movement shows clearly that it is a turbulent movement, the only two thing that can cause that turbulent movement apart from liquids is the air
The Apollo 11 flag moves when the astronauts are assembling, moving it and adding energy to it and stops when they stop moving it. The flag had a pole cross the top to make it appear like it was flying as if on Earth. It oscillates when moved as it gains energy but can not dissipate that energy easily as there is no air in a vacuum to remove energy and dampen the oscillations. The entire flag assembly and Buzz Aldrin salute was filmed using the 16mm camera and is easily found online: eg: "Apollo 11 - 16mm magazine 1094-K" on the YT channel "Apollo 11 - Apollo Flight Journal". You will clearly that the flag behaves exactly as it should in a low gravity, zero atmospheric resistance environment and that it stops moving when that astronauts stop touching it. Take care.
Why Alien backwards😊
I have a great snarky comment for you dude. But I'll be nice today and say God bless you.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth i understand that principle but it still does not explain the regime of the movement. Thats my main argument. If you move an object in vacune conditions, the movement will be predictable. And i can argue that not just predictable, but also laminar, thats water does not flow in space even if you apply a force on firs place. All the molecules of the water will move with a speed an a direction that should not be changing along the way unless you stir it up. Anyway there is lot to discuss.
@@jaylooppworld381 Thank you for your reply. All 5 Apollo landing flags (I am leaving out Apollo 12 flag as it did not have a cross pole) behaved in the same way. They flapped when the astronauts moved them and stopped moving when the astronauts went away. It is really that simple. Take care.
Yo the first verse was in GTA VICE CITY. the same sound you hear when police level increases
Total fake 😂
🌈No🌈
Absolutely fake
Explain how this is fake
We've never been there dont be so naive.
@@bigbbennett4382 how is it fake though?
"Mankind's biggest lie."
I know, right!! Traveled 239,000 miles to the moon and landed in a tin can in -300 degrees Fahrenheit temperatures.
Tell me how it’s fake
It is absolutely fake!
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
JEALOUSY
It’s simple. There are enough billionaires out there and I would imagine that someone would spit the money out just for an instagram shot 🤷♂️ my opinion. We have not been through the van Allen belt . That’s the first thing we have to be able to tackle
Funny, Dr. James Van Allen totally disagrees with you and advise NASA on how to pass through the belts which are named after him. I think that I will go with his opinion! Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth
The FACT than Van Allen HIMSELF did NOT travel through them, let's me know that he and you are completely wrong. 😂🤣
Maybe YOU traveled through them... 🤣🤣 (🤡!)
@@LuanChuppi So in your own head you actually think that you know more about the Van Allen Belts than Dr. James Van Allen himself......When in reality you do not even seem to know that there are more than one belts.......The Dunning Kruger is strong in you! Take care.
Amazing stuff and this shows how clever humans are 💯💯💯
Clever enough to fake most of the world.
But there were ppl in those days who never believed it was real. They were right.
lol .. communication from the moon yeti can’t get reception from mount rainier
@@Jessicarabbitofapokolips
Yetis on Mount Rainer do not have cell phones.
Thanks For The Memories, Neil!🌝 It Was REALLY Something!💪😉
It was nothing 😂😂😂
So many comments still disagreeing on this 🤦♂️
But they will never produce any evidence to back up their claims. Take care.
Disagreement is meaningless. It doesn't change the facts.
Because it didn’t happen. That’s more evident now than it ever has been. Yes. The government lies, what a surprise.
And here you are still believing it 😂😂😂😂😂💀😬
@@user-ly5de8sp2jSo you trust conspiracy theorists more than physicists? You do realise that if it were fake, some physicists would have debunked it. Not all of them are sponsored by the government.
2024 here , 20th June --> we supposed of went to moon . As I speak the Boeing Spaceliner cannot return as yet ??? But !! … 50 years ago we talked to humans and went to the moon ???
At this exact day 55 years ago the Apollo 11 was on the moon 🌕 back in July 20 1969
How are you 30 days in the future?
😂😂😂😂
@@dansv1 i live in denmark
Who filmed it? 😅
The filming of Armstrong 's first steps on the lunar surface (Apollo 11 Mission) was achieved with a Westinghouse TV camera which was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA. The signal was transmitted to Earth where the recording took place. Shortly afterwards Armstrong moved this camera a short distance from the LM and mounted it on a tripod facing the LM. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth So, some company developed a camera with a technology to support a voyage of 4 days in space, subject to extreme temperatures, speed, humidity, barometric pressure close to zero, fifty years ago in order to, what? 3 seconds of film? Do you think that part of the whole project would be relevant? Or was it just to show off? Since when science privileges image over logic?
@@paulocoutinho9133 (1) "some company developed a camera". The Apollo cameras were designed and manufactured by a range of companies including Hasselblad, Westinghouse and Maurer.
(2) "a voyage of 4 days in space"......In total the Apollo Program accounted for more than 100 days of manned spaceflight.
(3) "3 seconds of film?"......There are many hundreds of hours of footage from the Apollo Program, from the Westinghouse TV camera as well as from the 16mm cameras. All of this along with the thousands of mission photographs and hundreds of hours of audio is available in the National Archives ad well on various NASA historical websites.
To be honest, from start to finish you do not seem to have much knowledge of the Apollo Program so keep studying. Take care.
@@paulocoutinho9133Many people at NASA actually fought against the use of cameras since it was primarily a scientific mission, and cameras wouldn’t add any additional benefit.
@@myles_bennett77 Only the images did. They inspired the next couple of generations of astronauts to become astronauts. And not just in the US. Not to mention tons of support people and shuttle designers and people going into astronomy and engineers ...
That's one small step on Stanley Kubrick's moon set.
Edit: And one giant LIE to mankind!
So any actual evidence to back up your claim?
By the way the flag is not moving in the Wind it's a stiff leg they are jostling it there is no wind there is no atmosphere
Do you know what happened when nasa put a man in a space suit in a vacuum chamber? He passed out instantly and almost died after less that 3 seconds! That was after the moon landing hoax was over.
@@proverbs2522 technical errors do happen
Science today tells us the moon is in our atmosphere today.
But the moon has no atmosphere. It’s just in one
Who took the shot of the first man on the moon?
@@derekseube7039 the camera that was in the lander
it should be: that’s one small step for humans, one giant leap for our existence
Imagine going live from the moon with the Joe Biden on the line.. in the 60’s..
Okay, i did it and nothing happened.
The Chinese said they didn’t find it…
No, they did find it. So did the Russians, Indians and Japanese orbiters.
@@archierush868 no, this fake
@@amiigoseif it was faked, then why did the Soviets and Chinese say it’s real? They had satellites orbiting the moon (Soviets in the mid 60’s, Chinese in the mid 2000 and 2010’s) and if it was faked, they wouldn’t have seen a lander and would have called the US out on a lie. They never did.
India also saw the landers and rovers with their satellites and Japan even did a 3d topographical render of Apollo 15’s landing site and when they compared it to pictures taken, the ground, valley and hills was a perfect match.
@@amiigoseno this is real
Incredible
is there any footage from inside the apollo 11 showing the full picture of the moon? i mean why there was only footage landing? the should make a record while they were orbiting the earth and the moon
Ok, now we have to endure comments by all the idiots who think this was staged!
Chris brown used this audio clip on his song called RED from Indigo album…❤❤❤
God bless America, God bless humanity ❤
Who shot this video when Armstrong took his first step on the moon?
Stanley Kubrick
@@ItsJustSoSweet Correct answer.
@@labibbiace💀💀 how u know ? Just asking
The landing module had a camera on it
@@NightShinerStudio Strong faith!
One giant lie for man kind
Such a big lie that there is several sources that its true yet all the sources for it being fake have been debunked?
Explain how it’s fake
@@Cozy_Offical
Explain how it's real; and how nobody can put a man or woman there now.
I'll be waiting until I'm purple in the face. 😂
The sheer amount of time and money spent on the programs, especially with Gemini and in the early stages of Apollo, is just too ludicrous for it to be faked. 3 astronauts were also killed in a flash fire on the ground during a test run of the Apollo spacecraft. Their sacrifices nearly costed us the entire program. But it was because of them that we made the command module safer. There were also 7 more flights, 4 of which were manned, launched to prepare for the landing. Apollo 4 and 6 tested the Saturn V, Apollo 5 tested the LM in an unmanned orbital test, Apollo 7 tested the orbital capabilities of the Command Module, Apollo 8 was the first to do a fly by of the Moon, Apollo 9 did a manned test of the CSM and the LM together, Apollo 10 was a full dress rehearsal for the landing, going 9 miles above the surface. All of this was in preparation for Apollo 11, which would land Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the lunar surface.
@@LuanChuppisimple answer : money and resources.
Neil armstrong back wards is alien
Gnortsmra lien
No it’s lien
@@jollybeans106 nope
Gnortmralien
The end says alien
Ok? You think they specifically chose him because his name is alien backwards? No it’s just random
Nice studio “steps”…
Thank you
Its not fàke
@@U.S.A._1_WW2 it is not real either
@@U.S.A._1_WW2oh it’s real all right. A real hoax.
@@silverdropstang what's not real
one small step for man one giant leap for mankind means don't go back.
The lunar lander batteries were not charged
Mankind has no business in outer space
We stand on the most unique chunk of rock in all of existence
Stanley Kubrick did a great job
Fake. 💀 Humans are so gullible. 😂
Agreed.
Bro then go to NASA and they will tell u
Imagine thinking the moon landing is fake like ever heard of Apollo 13 and 1 💀 and the fact you don’t even know anything about the mission it’s self is just sad. Either what we’re going back.
It’d cost them more to fake it than it’s entire budget
@@Lor_Duck true
Nice special effects in a studio
You live in Lala land mate...the sad thing is that you got the right to vote
@@user-gt4fq9qb5t the sad thing is that you still believe a lie 50 years later
@darkentity5443 I find it hilarious how you have zero proof lil bro
Yeah give us some proof instead of yapping.@@darkentity5443
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Wow the flag is flying..
Nah its not
Wo stick ke madad se hai
"Flying"??? 😂
Not flying lol
Hey 14y/o kid get a sleep & do ur school homework.
Who’s the cameraman shooting this video?
Camera on a panel which was opened with a switch outside the hatch. Not every camera has a person behind it
Hollywood
the flying flag
You're right. Thats why nasa told they lost original footage of this video
After that they released the some videos which they got from Australia. They relied it from australia only nasa told but we never know. I dont believe Armstrong land in moon
Its not flying
do research before speaking
Fr
show Ted Kennedy watching
They are really landing on the moon in 2025.
2025 will just be a crewed flyby. Expect 2026-7 for a landing by then.
He should’ve just left it at one small step for man, because nobody has been up there ever again
??? They have gone to the moon 9 times.
They landed 6 times. 12 men have walked on the moon.
@@dansv1 ok mr. Literal. It wasn’t literal it was saying we haven’t been on the moon since 1972.
"Ever again" is a long time. And it's only been 51 years, which is nothing by comparison.
Wow the Flag is Waving it looks like the Moon have Atmosphere 😂😂😂
filmed in nevada desert we ave the original footage with cmera man on the moon so we know you all lie
Very very lucky men who just land on moon
I bet some of these haters believe we have a crashed ufo with the craft pilots in a building at are 51. Stupid people l
It was just a show😂
Who take that video... 😂
Not "who" but "what", the camera was attached to the Lunar Module. Take care.
Tue moon landing the greatest lie ever told
No. The greatest lie ever told is when your ex-girlfriend said that used to get her off.
Apollo 11 landed on a Sunday.
@@joevignolor4u949i needed this laugh today, thank you
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Flad had a strong spring to deploy it. Like it was. Waving...duhhhhh
Why did he land on the moon on my birthday
A trusting proud war fighting country duped by its government.
Who is filming it😂
The filming of Armstrong 's first steps on the lunar surface (Apollo 11 Mission) was achieved with a Westinghouse TV camera which was mounted on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps. This Westinghouse camera was stored for flight in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), a compartment near the ladder that Armstrong climbed down to reach the Moon’s surface. To activate the camera, he pulled on a handle that in turn released the door to the MESA and turned the camera on. The signal was transmitted to Earth where the recording took place. Shortly afterwards Armstrong moved this camera a short distance from the LM and mounted it on a tripod facing the LM. Take care.
The film director lol
WHY HAVE WE NOT GONE BACK ?!?!
Oh that’s right the technology was destroyed 🤣
After Apollo 11 landing, we went back many times. Take care.
The budget was way higher in 1969 since they were racing with the USSR. They have the technology but not the money.
Whats the name of this movie ?
It's called Apollo 11. This is the time where all the Gold is being used up that's why they had to discontinue the Bretton Woods agreement. Since then, money has been printed out of thin air.
nah but imagine he said that and then accidentally just fell out of the rocket, or if one of the people in the rocket just pushed him aside and jumped out and went like “YEA GUYS ITS ME, IM ON THE MOON YALL NOT NEIL!”
There's a story that Collins told him "If you had any balls, you'd scream "What is that?" then cut your mic"
One big lie for the mankind😂
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Nice Action Movie....thankx Mr. Stanley Kubrick
Bro he filmed a movie and not this
Oh, you are one of those? What is more likely? That we faked a Moon landing? Or that we actually landed on the Moon, but nobody knows exactly how we did it. So, in an attempt to flush out decades old (but still classified) technology, our adversaries started a campaign saying, "Nyah, nyah, you never went to the Moon! Oh, you did? OK, then prove it! How did you shield the astronauts against the Van Allen radiation? Why did you suppress the fact that the Moon's gravity is actually closer to 1/3 of the Earth instead of 1/6? And if the Moon's gravity is 1/3 of the Earth's gravity, then why wasn't the device that launched the lunar module off the Moon and back into space closer to 1/3 of the enormous Saturn V rocket that originally launched them off the Earth? Oh, you won't tell us those secrets? Then obviously Stanley Kubrick and Jack Nicholson filmed the whole thing in an Arizona barn..."
Fake
So who shot the video footage?
The camera holder if the government can get people into space they can get a cheap camera holder
Buzz Aldrin.
@@Anonymousperson53543 does stupid come naturally to you?
@@geocooley7282 Why does someone have to have 'shot' it?
If you wanted to film the first step of a human being onto the Moon, are you telling us that you can't think of a simple way of doing it? Really??
There was a camera on the leg of the eagle
Live from a Backlot in Hollywood 😮
Just good ol' American Propaganda
This is real we have moon rocks how could they possibly simulate the low gravity in Hollywood.
special effects@@briandevine8292
And Hollywood definitely existed in 1969.
Btw most people heard it on the radio and newspaper 😂 never been to space never will
oh
Historic first steps on Arizona😂
One small step for A man..
He meant mankind genius
@@jollybeans106the actual quote is “One small step for A man, one giant step for for mankind”
His accent made it sound like “for man”.
One small step for man (mankind), one giant leap for mankind doesn’t really make sense
Am I the only one wondering why his legs are translucent???
I'm not sure the details, but it has to do with the image being burned into the low-quality camera after staring at it for a long time and taking a long time for the image to clear, kind of like how old CRT monitors would burn the image into the screen if you left them on without a screensaver.
There's a spot about 20-30 minutes into the footage where the camera gets shifted and you can see two horizons for about 10 seconds.
Big lie.
Explain
All these camera angles
Yeah, Cool Right?
Camera was on a panel which can be opened from the inside and pointed towards the ladder.
Dajjaal
Armageddon\ with or without steps?
Another Proof?
Slow mow looked good in the 60s
No, its just a bad camera since its the 60s and its on the moon.
No Air on moon 😂😂😂
Yeah, there isn’t. It’s a vacuum meaning no air or any gases at all
No way you can land to a non solid place.....
Luck they were going to the moon then.
Uncrdivel ⏰ very risky
Great comedy
Geneus
fake
No
@@brox_guy4092 yes
@@JaisalLakum No
@@brox_guy4092 it fake
@@JaisalLakum it isn’t
yang masih jadi misteri film ini Sutradaranya tidak terpublikasi ?
Stanley Kubrick
So you're telling me that they managed to pull it off in 1969 but they have never attempted in 2010s or 2020s with a much more advanced technology and the possibility to take clear footage? I ain't buying it.
They went 5 more times since then and there is more clear footage.
You do understand that moon mission faced major criticism and leaders were even cancelled later , doing jt today woukd at least charge a near total of $150 Billion Dollars
You do realize that they literally just have no reason to go back right? And besides, their gonna go back in a year or two
Exactly
You "ain't buying" that no one has wanted to spend money on manned moon landings since 1972? Why ever not?
Who shoot that???
Rover
@@Lor_Duck There was no LRV taken on the Apollo 11,12, 14 landings. The LRV was on the 15, 16, 17 landings. The footage of Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface was taken with the Westinghouse TV camera attached to the LM. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Oh, thanks!
@@Lor_Duck Thank you for your polite reply. Take care.
So fake its ridiculous lol
If it was faked, the Soviets would have said it was faked, but they never did. Instead they said the US unnecessarily risked human life to land a man on the moon and that the Soviets was never going to land a man on the moon, despite the Soviets also making a moon rocket and lander at the same time as the Saturn-V called the N1, failing all 4 times it launched unmanned.
This is real
People really believe this
hoax
Maybe this time you will actually produce the evidence to back up your claim????
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth flat earth and moonlanding are a hoax.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth we can’t make it past the van Allen radiation belts as of today. Which means we couldn’t have done it 50 years ago. There’s your evidence. *take care.*
@@darkentity5443 agree
@@darkentity5443 Whoever has told you that " we can’t make it past the van Allen radiation belts as of today" has seriously misinformed you. No such comment was ever made and NASA nor any other space agency think this. Your misunderstanding is not evidence. Take care.
fake landing hahha
If NASA was able to do it years ago where technology was not that advanced and they were able to land real people on the moon, in space, and in a very one in a million possibilities of taking those men back alive on Earth, why can't they do it again today where every technology is in another level of advancement?
It has nothing to do with technology, it's about budget cuts and politics. NASA doesn't even have close to the budget it had in 1969. Adjusted for inflation, NASA's budget in 1969 was over 170 billion dollars, which is way more than the 25 billion dollars they have today. Also it's mostly just computers that have advanced a lot since the Apollo program. Most of the cost in a space program comes from the cost of building these rockets, not the computers that control them. It's the same reason cars are still expensive even with more advanced computers. You still have to pay for the engine, plumbing, materials, and labor costs.
In spite of all that, NASA is actually going back to the moon this next year. Look up project Artemis and you'll see what I mean
Faked it!
Who shoot the moon landing..?
Who was take shoot the video
Camera on a panel opened with a switch outside the hatch
Hollywood
OMG you can see another man smiling in the refection of the Helmut..good grief..lol bring the curtain down already NASA.
pareidolia
/păr″ī-dō′lē-ə/
noun
The perception of a recognizable image or meaningful pattern where none exists or is intended, as the perception of a face in the surface features of the moon.
The tendency to interpret a vague stimulus as something known to the observer, such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals, seeing shapes in clouds, or hearing hidden messages in music.
@@dansv1 and sometimes a face is a face. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean you're wrong.😁
@@RaquelPatton-pb5kpNo way you said he's paranoid
@@Captain_Obvious69420 no I said just because someone is doesn't mean they are wrong and just because people see faces in things doesn't mean they are not there..look at the Helmut for yourself
@RaquelPatton-pb5kp Bro, I won't lie; that took me two minutes to read.
One giant lies for mankind 😂
i dont think u have the proof for ur comment.ur the liar here
If it was a lie then why does China and Russia still acknowledge it?
Climate change😂
These people in this comment section are real jokes first they say the who recorded it and when they realize that a person doesn't always have to carry it and there's camera holders they spewt out debunked "PROOF" they have but no matter what they will always think there smarter than the nasa scientist, mathematicians and astronauts that performed the calculations engineering necessary for space travel but in reality they just failed to get a kindergarten education.
Proof
Name of cameramen is?
Lander
Camera holder or maybe a solid object they put it on
Maybe Buzz Aldrin
@@EightFiggano buzz could not exit before him that would mean he was first but that is wrong it is a camera on the leg of the LM
@@Mrhouse_enthusiast oh ok thx
They Lie Above@youtube. The Astronauts Wife 1999.😂