Poland Is Getting The Two Best Tanks On Earth
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Poland received the first shipment of M1 Abrams main battle tanks (MBTs) that were purchased by Warsaw for the Polish Army. A total of 366 Abrams MBTs will eventually be acquired by Poland as it attempts to bolster its military as a deterrent to Russia. The M1 Abrams aren’t the only modern MBTs that have arrived in Poland. South Korean-based Hyundai Rotem will supply Poland with 180 K2 MBTs by 2025.
#militaryreview
#k2blackpanther
#m1a1
#abramstank
#mbt
#howitzers
#korean
As an American, it's real good to have Poland and South Korea as allies.
Its real good to have US on back😊greetings
LOL @ ALLIES
AIN'T NOTHING STOPPING A NUKED EARTH
세계 최대강대국과 동맹인점은 든든하죠
특히 근비경쟁이 심한 동북아에서
Why? Both countries geostrategicaly present no strategic benefit for US. They dont contribute to US security but their long standing historical beef with their neighbours can implicate US in wars they don't need to fight.
@@hrvojehajdic2729 Brother, read the history books. As long as the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth existed, Russia was a country on the border of Asia and Europe, we were a wall protecting Europe from eastern barbarism. You can trade with them but trust them - never.
GOOD JOB POLAND !
GET READY TO KICK SOME SOVIET ARSE !!!
W 1975 roku Korea potwierdziła swój plan opracowania czołgu K1. Produkcja rozpoczęła się w 1985 roku i została dostarczona koreańskiej armii w 1987 roku.
Do 1997 roku wyprodukowano ogółem 1027 egzemplarzy. Dzięki takim wysiłkom powstał K2. Polska nie powinna myśleć o licencjonowaniu produkcji K2 z dnia na dzień. Myślę jak złodziej.
k2 planuje produkcję od 1992 roku. Opracowywany od 1995 roku. A w 2014 roku został powołany do wojska. K2 nie powstało z dnia na dzień. Polska stara się łatwo transferować technologię K2 i produkować ją w kraju. To pomysł złodzieja. Musimy powoli uczyć się koreańskiego know-how w zakresie produkcji wielu czołgów.
Don’t forget that the 🇺🇸 still has the NEW Abrams X
K2 K9🇰🇷💪👍
Brawo Mariusz Błaszczak
👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍❤✌️
slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre
Puk Puk 🫣
wow i truly envy the country of Poland for having the U.S made M1A1 "Abram" MBT and the South Korean built K2 "Black Panther" MBT, in there armed forces. Congratulations to them, for having those two types of one of the best combat military assets in the world.
That's why we buy the best. with an active defense will be even harder to destroy.
We only acquired about 100 m1a1 but our main version of abrams will be the newest m1a2 sepv3
W polskich rękach taki sprzęt dobry zrobi 3x wiecej niż może
This gotta be ai
How I wish these tanks had been available to Poland in the summer of 1939. Yet I take comfort in the fact that now such history will never repeat for Poland.
In 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea with military aid from the Soviet Union. Without any tanks in its army, South Korea saw its capital, Seoul, fall within three days, and the country was on the brink of complete destruction within a month. Fortunately, the intervention of the U.N. forces saved South Korea from near annihilation.
Over the past 70 years, South Korea has achieved remarkable economic growth and risen to the 6th place in the world militarily. As someone born and raised in Seoul in 1972, I had the opportunity to witness this entire journey. Education played a crucial role for Koreans, especially those who lacked resources, as it became the key to success. It's truly heartening to see how South Korea, once reliant on foreign aid for survival, has now developed and is exporting its own weapons.
@@rohrichbeau1004교육이 그 나라에 도움이 될망정 발전의 원동력으로 보긴 힘듭니다. 한국말고도 교육열과 똑똑한 소규모 국가들이 있으나 못살아요. 이는 교육 때문이라기보다 국제관계의 행운과 강력한 질좋은 지도자 때문이란 걸 반증합니다. 교육은 그냥 말할게 없어서 하는 말이죠
@@helloareyouthere 교육도 한몫한게 큽니다 그 질좋은 지도자들도 집권했을 당시 투자도많이 하고 교육을 중요시했었습니다 교육+외교+지도자+국민성이 종합적으로 이뤄낸 성과라고 봅니다 저중하나를 고르자면 작성자와같은 외교가 1 교육이 2 국민성=지도자3 이런 순위를 주고싶군요
And what would have changed and 1000 such tanks? The Polish problem lay not in the lack of effective tanks, but in the lack of military vehicles in general, obsolete aviation, lack of or erroneous military doctrines bad management and command system and many other things. In 1939, no German tank had thicker armor than 30mm.
All of Poland's problems at the time can be boiled down to a few points:
1. too little time had passed to build a strong country after 123 years of partition and World War I.
2. The country's elites focused on power struggles instead of expanding the economy and later modernizing the military.
3. No real alliances were built, through their own stupidity, as well as the stupidity of politicians from other countries.
Returning to tanks, a simple M4 sherman would have been fully sufficient to destroy any German armored vehicle in 1939, itself immune to enemy hits.
It would be better to run away when you see a K2 tank on the battlefield.
@@오동호-m1y Greetings from Poland Brother!
why u know? never was in active fight
god bless poland. America and the rest of the world is beside you Thank you for helping ukraine.😊
You don't know much about ukraine, do you.
I have a lot of Ukrainians at work in Poland. Very friendly people
@@da9mi5an61 no doubt, there are good people among them. But we can see the Wehrmacht symbols on the american M113s, we have seen the civilian victims of ukrainian shelling, pro-russian people burned in Odessa, tortured and killed POVs, purge, and many horrible personal stories from those, who come to us, and so on...
@@petervincze3868 Putin bot. Nobody buys your BS. There’s only one person responsible for this horrible war: Putin. He’s the Hitler of the 21st century
@@petervincze3868how much for a post, putlers doggie?
Kudos for pronouncing Szczecin and Gdynia :)
@rom_troy4784 faktem jest. Wstyd.
@@kjererrrt2381 Przecież wszyscy wiedzą, że to komentarz trolla nastawionego na podziały między narodami. Kacapy już przegrały, Ukraina i Polska wygrają.
한국과 폴란드는 안보와 경제 협력에서 윈-윈 관계를 맺을 것입니다. 폴란드는 한국에 소고기, 돼지고기 등심, 우유를 공급하고 있다. 대한민국은 신뢰할 수 있는 나라이며 폴란드의 발전에 동참해 주셨으면 합니다
하고 싶어요. 한국 시민으로서 당당하게 말할 수 있는 말입니다. 대한민국은 폴란드를 속이지 않고 상호 존중하는 관계로 나아가는 나라입니다
하고 있습니다.
Dzięki ci bracie z Korei, ufamy wam bardziej niż jankesom
Jesteśmy bardzo zadowoleni ze współpracy z republiką Korei. Ufamy wam i bardzo doceniamy to jak szybko i profesjonalnie przebiega współpraca z waszym narodem. Uważam że nasze narody skorzystaja na tej współpracy. Pozdrowiam i serdecznie zapraszam was do Polski.
respect for Korea Brothers...from Poland
And it still has 200+ Leopards 2
K2 is proven that it has better fire control system and higher mobility than M1 Abram and Leopard 2 tanks. Only K2 offer 2x higher angle of attack with main gun and top attack munition that can hit enemy 8km away over mountains. Ride is also more comfortable with adaptive suspension.
These rapid deliveries also show steady flow of modern weapons is possible, flex of west arms industry
The Polish deliveries were built/intended for the ROKA, which got stripped of its planned procurement schedule.
@@sehoonkim2131 지속적인 필요성 그것이 낮은가격과 높은 퀄리티를 가능하게 합니다😂
폴란드에 각종 무기가 오고 강해지자.... 벨라루스는 입을 닫고 조용해 졌다...
Poland power
The export version is used by the armies of Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Iraq and now Poland..
But not Abrams version Sep3.
Poland didn't get the export version... the ones already in delivery ar the same tanks used by the US marine corps... the main order is for the latest sep v3 version... So basicaly Poland will be operating the same versions as the US as the only country.
Brawo WP 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍
slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre
🫣 Puk Puk
@@kjererrrt2381 russian agent
Polish army is stacked. Imagine an armored column with K2 panthers on the front line and when these speedy bois aren't enough in the horizon you see an enormous column of M1 Abrahams merging.
CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!
k2 에는 자동조준 장치가 있고 유기압 현수장치 때문에 험난한 지형 주행에도 정확한 조준과 사격 그리고 승차감이 편해서 전차병들의 피로도를 줄여준다 k2 분당 10발 발사속도를 자랑하고 있다 르끌레드 분당 발
사속도는 k2에 절반 밖에 안됩니다
S.Korea survived Korean war because of USA ARMY. POLAND was also saved by USA ARMY. 3 nations are ETERNAL BLOOD BROTHERS.
@goodjob3314 This claim is only the claim of pro-North Korea leftist forces with the intention of making South Korea communist. The people of South Korea believe that they survived the war thanks to the United States and the UN forces. And the cause of the war is only North Korea's Kim Il-sung and the Soviet Union's permission.
I am a Korean. It's a heartbreaking history of the 1950 war.
Poland and Korea have the same history. As a Korean, I want to say thank you to the countries that participated in the war.
The Korean people support Poland. I think we're brothers. Let's cheer up! 😁😁😄😄
Od czego armia USA uratowała Polskę i kiedy?
@@user-Geordicjesteśmy braćmi
Kolego z Ameryki chciałem Ci powiedzieć jako polak jedną rzecz,że wasz prezydent Roosevelt sprzedał mój kraj ruskim a nie go uratował wolność to sobie sami wywalczyliśmy 1989,roku wasz kraj w niczym nam nie pomógł, tylko nas sprzedał,historii nie oszukasz
You underestimate Ruzzias stupidity!
I would presume the leopard 2 tanks would go into reserve and the k2s would be the main tank force with m1 abrams guarding major citys and important areas
They buy both mainly because they wanted fast arrival of many modern tanks. Germans were not able to offer huge amount of modern Leopards 2 in a short time. Only US and South Korea were able to deliver enough of them quite fast (so 2-3 years).
Not exactly. Abrams - the best protected tanks in the World - will be defending big open plains of south eastern Poland, while K2 - which is not well armoured on its sides, but is lighter and good in crossing water obstacles - is about to serve mainly in north eastern Polish territories, full of lakes, swamps and small rivers, near the Kaliningrad oblast. Leopard 2PL tanks (Polish modernization of Leopard 2A4 and 2A5) will be send back to the south western part of the country and wait to be used as a second line of defence.
@@wojtek1582 they won't save you. poles don't enter ukraine.
@@kjererrrt2381 What you? Are you so stupid that you think I am Ukrainian?
@@kjererrrt2381 Yeah, protected by keeping them far from the front.
Brawo, a jak ruskie będą fikać, to im zrobimy drugi wjazd na Moskwę: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish-Lithuanian_occupation_of_Moscow
Wolność i niepodległosć jest ważniejsza niż każde pieniądze. W Polsce mówi się ze jeśli nie chcesz karmić swojej armi będziesz karmił armię wroga.
They have products from both Hyundai and Samsung as Rotem is a family company of Hyunday motor group and Hanhwa aero space has been changed from Samsung aero space. K9 has been devoped when Hanwha aero space was Samsung aero space.
Polish power...
Only the best equipment is worth the tax payers money. In top 3 i would put also Israeli Merkava 4.
T 90 rules
@@anprzewlocki1934 T-800
Merkava is not suitable for vast Polish flat spaces.
so u say, leo2, abrams, k2 merkava? thats good, lol
Just one thing. Poland is not an easter european country, it is central european country for god sake.
And since we're on the subject, I'd like to ask you personally whether it's that easy to implement the second phase of Poland and build a tank factory in Poland. The special steel used in tanks requires advanced technology and refers to the capabilities of iron ore mines. Are you saying that you're transferring the technology so that Poland can make it on its own? This is a national security issue. Or are you saying that we're transporting special steel by ship from our country? And are there small and medium-sized companies in Poland that have excellent mold technology to make internal parts? I don't understand what you're talking about. I thought it was just exporting finished products and doing simple maintenance. Do you think that's possible with Poland's capabilities? ... This doesn't make sense... How can a country with backward iron ore mine technology build an advanced iron ore mine in such a short period of time, and who will pay for the enormous amount of money? Isn't the K2 armor not just armor? It's a composite armor with advanced technology that's security-grade, so how can you build a supply industry in an underdeveloped industrial country? Do Romania or Poland have that astronomical amount of money? I don't understand how local production would go when small and medium-sized companies with 1,000 different technologies come together to assemble the K2 tank. And can you make a perfect OLED monitor with advanced semiconductors? I doubt you can make even one button properly.
It might be better for Poland to develop in a joint venture with Germany and France. The reason I say this is because even if the entire nation is united, it is not enough, but the Polish people are divided, making things more difficult. I think it would be better to complain to Germany or France.
블랙팬더 간지 좔좔 🐱
Normally its logistically very problematic to have different platforms. But Black panther is 55 tons class and Abrams in 65 tons class. Poland might be think of more strategic use of those in different areas because of the different needs. Yet it would be intresting to see both in same combat zone in integrated use if possible.
those tank will be used on polish-belarus border, terrein there is heavly soaked with water and so there is a lot of swamps, massive forest etc.
K2 and M1 have many interchangeable parts.
It's supposed to be an American model. abrams, heavy bwp, apache. . change, unlike in the American army, a lot of rocket and gun artillery.K2 divisions will also have a lot of barrel and rocket artillery with IFV Borsuk. We don't have enough aviation.anti-aircraft defense rocket and gun artillery. we entered into a partnership with the UK to have short range battery effectors.
K2 tanks made by Hyundai and Kia motors group.
the people's republic of korea will be happy to have them.
Sorry there, but the BEST TANK IN SERVICE right now, is the Leopard 2A7.
It's not even close.
it not the best if you get it 20 years later
Houthi rebels were blowing up Saudi owned Abram tanks left, right and center in Yemen with Soviet anti tank weapons from the 1970s like pop corn.
Just Google it up and you will find all sorts of videos and pictures of that on Google.
If the Houthis could do that to the Abram tanks, think about what Russia would to them.
I will give you an hint, the Leopards that were given to Ukraine are getting blown up by Russian Lancets 3 drones, and artillery without seeing a single Russian soldier.
Furthermore, Abram tanks are a maintenance nightmare, break down like crazy and need spare parts on a regular basis, have jet engines, use jet fuel and are too heavy and therefore not adequate for the muddy terrain of Eastern Europe.
Rasputita or the liquid mud of Ukraine's soil would completely destroy them
Jak leopardy czy Abramsy nie dadzą rady, to wejdą polskie PT-91, dobrze zmodernizowana postsowiecka broń, idealna do walki przeciw rosyjskiemu sprzętowi.
All free countries must stand together against evil.
against ukraine?
@@kjererrrt2381 Poles should know!
😍😍😍😍👋👋👋👋👋👌👍👍👍👍👍
slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre
@@kjererrrt2381 wake up watnik, you've shit yourself :)
It’s definitely wise to acquire the best tank that can be procured in numbers and at a very reasonable price at this point in time. But I read: Poland will start local production of the K2 in 2026. Surely that doesn’t refer to the K2 as is today?! For export they’d be competing with Turkey, whose Altay is also a K2 built under license with various improvements.
By 2026 I gather most 🇺🇸🇩🇪🇫🇷🇮🇱 MBT will have a 130mm gun (which Rheinmetall/KNDS have been working on for decades, though originally in the early 90s they worked on a 140mm gun, which is something we might see in the GMCS, but a new telescopic technology from Nexter)
Anyway, with the strategic partnership between UkrOboronProm and Rheinmetall, I assume 🇺🇦 will be the first to use a 130mm gun tank, probably a some kind of UkroPanther, modified to best fit 🇺🇦 requirements - especially a weapon officers station to coordinate artillery support and incorporate both observation and attack drones.
한국도 k3 개발중입니다. 130mm 포와 전기추진 하이브리드 엔진에 첨단 전자장비등 탑재 계획입니다. 터키 알타이어도 사실 k2 전차 기술이전으로 개발된 전차인점 상기 시켜드립니다.
All of the new tank designs, KF51, Leopard 3, K-3, Abrams X have been designed with the 130 mm gun.
@@jimpark8379 With *a* 130mm gun, rather. The Rh130 produces over 20 MJ of kinetic energy when the projectile leaves the barrel - that's a 50% increase over the Rh120 L/55 (which again produces about 4 MJ more than the previous L/44 - still being used in the Abrams, though today's Abrams probably more than makes up for the 4 MJ with it's proprietary high tech ammunition).
The 20+ MJ of kinetic energy the Rh130 generates is even quite a bit more than the experimental 140mm ASCALON that the French want to put on the MGCS. As it stands the Rh130 can destroy any tank currently in use with a frontal hit from 2km away.
Now I'd be surprised if the new American gun were less capable, especially given the high tech ammunition American tanks are equipped with. But development of a new 140mm or 130mm cannon for the Leopard started in the 1990s ("Project NPzK"). Work on the 140mm stopped when it became clear that the necessary changes of the Leopard to carry the 140mm gun weren't going to happen but afaik, Rheinmetall at their own expense continued research on their Rh130 all those years along with the improved Rh120 L55A1 that will have it's debut on the Leopard 2A8, which manages to eek out a further 8% compared to the normal Rh120 L/55, so about 1MJ of additional kinetic energy for your APFSDS and they also developed an improved round for the new tank, making it a very decent stopgap for any client who feels they need to replace or add to their 50 slightly upgraded Leopard 2A4/5 in light of the Russian threat RIGHT NOW rather than wait at least two more years when you can realistically expect to order the KF51 Panther. According to Rheinmetall we should see the beginning of serial production in Ukraine towards the end of the year. Around that time they should also become available to other clients, with a production line being established in Hungary. Apparently Viktor Orbán wants to create jobs and establish a defense sector in Hungary. Even though he only ordered less than 300 Lynx (and already spent his tank money on 50 Leopard 2A7HU) he had Rheinmetall build two quite large production and testing facilities. And now he gave them €300 million to develop a custom chassis for the Panther (the only part missing) and the tooling to have it produced at their Hungarian plant.
@@hisredrighthand5212 I am glad to hear that Rheinmetall is doing pioneering work on the successor to the smoothbore 120 mm gun they basically invented and which took over the market, and everyone either licensed or copied in some way.
My guess is that the basic Rheinmetall design for the 120 mm smooth bore has been out for a while and the variants are pretty similar. If anyone comes up with a massive improvement it will get licensed. Any ammo improvements can also be licensed or the ammunition can just be purchased. Each 120 or 130 mm gun will have to use ammo that meets NATO standards so the Rheinmetall ammo should not be exclusive to the KF51.
I'm glad Rheinmetall is stepping into the Ukrainian market. Korea actually received a tech transfer from Russia in the 90s and the deal was we couldn't use weapons that has Russian tech against Russia, so Korean weapons are sold to Europe with a restriction on transfer to Ukraine.
So that's a market needing weapons that Korea can't supply, so I'm glad the German firms can build economies of scale in Ukraine and provide better, cheaper weapons to everyone.
The Russians and Chinese kit is completely crap, but they're armed to the teeth and their leaders are desperate. They're gonna probe for weak countries to invade and there's not enough supply to meet demand or needs.
So Germany and especially a legendary company like Rheinmetall stepping up is great news for the Western alliance.
The bearfoot houthis can destoy the best tanks in the world, ha, ha
I thought the leopards were the best tanks in the world, very confused, oh yes the Russians put an end to that myth
lol,yes destroy 2 or 3 ;)
Search the Norwagian Test results between K2 and Leopard 2a7 in 2022.
a end to it? sure thats why they do their job in ukraine. btw dont usa lost abrams not also.and not tank is undestroyable, and most leos was lost because ukraine used them wrong that one time.
They know something that I don't? What's coming on their way?
We call it "better blow (air) on the cold" Lepiej dmuchać na zimnę.
Bullhonky. The Abrams is not better than Leo2, Chally2 or Merkava4
sure its not. esp the leo2 and abrams based on the same design the kpz70. oh plus the abrams use just a bit modified canon which is also in the leo2, it just a license canon usa use
@sebt-sy2ok even based upon the same prototype from the 1970s can still have huge differences, the engines e.g., electro optics and BMS
🇵🇱🤝🇺🇸💪😎👍
K1 mbt based on M1 mbt
And K2 mbt based on K1 mbt
So basically M1 and K2 parts are common things
the russian lancet drones will figure it out.
@@kjererrrt2381 they cant figure out their own ass
@@PiotrSobierski why? rusisans hit jets, dont u see how they are able to shoot their own jets down
and what m1 mbt based on? on kpz70. also, The shape of the hull and turret is based on the German Leopard 2 main battle tank and the American M1A1
무기의 성능보다는 폴란드 군인들이 위력적이기 때문에 성능으로 오인할 가능성이 크다.🧐
Next thing you know Poland is the M10 booker
Yes
Gdynia pozdrawia.
Better BlackPink than this 2 tanks
test to Ukraine
хаха
Excellent 👍🙏
🤔 Unusual having 2 main battle tanks.
Up to this point we had 3 (T-72, PT-91, Leopard 2 in three versions) with two different calibres so that's still a progress
welcome to ukraine. the drones are waiting for you.@@Dexter8393
I'll explain.
Germany proved to be unreliable with service and deliveries, not to mention their initial "involvement" at the beginning of the war in Ukraine.
US won't agree to share the technology, but it's always good politically to pour them some money and at the same time keep German lobbyst a little bit more at bay.
Korea proved to be reliable, meeting deadlines and is open to license its construction.
@@Dexter8393 caliber is mostly the same
Didn't think Poland was having Russian tanks 😂😂😂
We've had many ruzzian tanks - destroyed ones from Ukraine on display 🤣🤣🤣
@charekuu and now Russia is going to display so called game changer tanks as well the difference is about a million dollars each 😆 🤣 😂
@@richardlee3502 ruzzia better invest into toilets and plumbing - it's 21st century and over 20% of ruzzians needs to go outside to take a sh*t 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
자주포랑 k2탱크 우리꺼 개좋은거임 외교 때문에 말 못하는거지 사실상 세계 최고 제품임 공격력,방어력,기동력뿐만 아니라 가격까지 개쌉 혜자임
우리는 abrams와 k2 탱크가 모두 최고라고 생각합니다. 우리는 파업을 위해 하나가 필요하고 기동 전쟁을 위해 다른 하나가 필요합니다.조준, 레이저 유도로 사격할 수 있도록 155mm 대포와 120mm 박격포용 포탄을 급히 준비하고 있습니다. 다른 이펙터.정확도, 30km에서 최대 30cm의 오류.이제 통신 장치에 도달했습니다. 가볍고 작으며 동시에 주파수가 다른 여러 위성과 지상 서비스와 통신합니다. 몇 개의 위성을 감염시키면 전환됩니다.우리는 그들이 GPS를 방해하거나 끄지 않도록 합니다.그것이 러시아인들이 이미 himars 미사일로 시도하고 있기 때문입니다.
쪽팔린다 지워라
이점도 있지만 이제서야 비등하거나 좀 밀리는 수준임 무조건 좋다고는 당연히 말 못하고 개좋다는건 헛소리
창피하니까 지워주세요
케이팝과 케이드라마로 흥해서 너같은 국뽕환자들로 망할 대한민국이다.어쩜 그렇게 중국애들이랑 닮었냐
False. Theyve replacing the best tank cuz they are still mad bcs of ww2 bruh... mf acting like people these days are responsable for things other people did ages ago -.-
well it's not actualy about wwII but bcuz germany is totaly not reliable at any international field at this point.. not even mentioning the low production rate and lack of spare parts, and supplies for leopard tanks...
@@RoozyyK thats why we are after usa the BIGGEST supportet to ukrainn with money and military equipment. but uk
i want these 2 plus the British and German tanks with compliment of light medium tanks,\
but i prefer the Dragon Ballz and a Titan Super Sayan upgrade.
다덤벼
Brawo Mariusz Błaszczak
👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍
slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre
🫣Puk Puk
They already have the best one on the frontline the challenger 2
너 제 정신이니? 그것은 기동하는데 2배의 돈이 들어, 달리면서 백발백중이 가능해, 밧데리로 무소음 조준과 10발 연속발사가 가능해 , 로켓 적외선기능 마비 가능해, 영국이 불쌍하다.Are you out of your mind? It costs twice as much to operate, it can hit with all ten shots while running, it can aim silently and fire 10 shots in succession with batteries, and it can paralyze the rocket's infrared function. Korea did it. But I feel sorry for England.
미국 탱크도 너무나 약하다. 한국은 얘기 해줬다. 미국은 듣지를 않는다.American tanks are also very weak. Korea spoke to the United States. America won't listen.
달리면서 자동조준 자동발사가 가능한 탱크... 다른 전차가 단발 소총이라면 한국전차는 40발 기관총이다.A tank capable of automatic aiming and automatic fire while running... If other tanks are single-shot rifles, the Korean tank is a 40-shot long gun.
독일도 항복했다. Germany also surrendered. 노르웨이 정치인들에게 돈주기 바쁘다. Germany is busy giving money to Norwegian politicians.
@@임석근-t5j Germany is busy giving money to Norwegian politicians...uhm WHAT? lol why norwegian? why we should give norway country? for what lol? and again what we surrender? would be a new thing, hear that first time lol
the 2 best tanks in the world are the leo2 and the challenger 2
에이브람스 전차가 상부 포탑과 차체의 간격이 커서 딱 자폭드론 측면 타격에 맞춤이네. 저거 우크라 갔다가는 레오파드보다 더 처참하게 상부 포탑과 차체가 분리되는 참사를 맞겠군
저 에이브람스 사양이 폴란드 제식사양은 아님.
수입된 M1A1은 M1A2 SEP V2나 V3 모델로 개량되어서 측면 방호능력을 개선할 예정이라 드론공격에 취약하지 않음.
To widocznie słabo ich szkolą, w polskich rękach taki sprzet to skarb my walcsyliśmy z pistoletami na czołgi
There is no such thing as the best tank. The M1A2 Abrams and K2 Black Panther are not better than a Leopard 2A7 or Merkava MK4 either. Any tank can be destroyed. In the end, a good tank only becomes the best tank with proper training and military tactics.
Wrong. Poland got the best armored tank in M1 and the best tank in the K2.
The Leopard and Merkava are old designs that have received repeated face lifts, they are clunky and flawed in several ways.
The K2 is the latest designed tank. It has by far the best electronics.
@@jimpark8379What are you talking about? The basic design of the M1 is just as old as the Leopard 2. The Leopard 2 was further improved in the final stages of development in terms of armor, weapons, optics, electronics and drive. With the M1 only the armour was improved. The K2 black panther is constantly being changed. It also has the drive gera, engine and cannon from the Leopard 2. The only thing new about the K2 is the full digitalization. This will get the other tanks too. And again, there is no such thing as the best tank. There are a number of tank models that are among the best and are constantly being developed. Successors to the K2 Black Panther, Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams are now being developed.
@@marcom.2793 Are you high? You just said the K2 is the only tank with modern electronics and that the other tanks are being "developed" to have modern electronics.
Modern warfare is about electronics. The tanks that you say are "equal" to the K2 don't even have modern electronics, you even said they're being developed.
A tank that is being "developed" to catch up is not equal, it's much worse.
The K2 would blow away an Abrams, Merkava, or Leopard. The K2 will fire 3 shots in 12 seconds before any of the other tanks can fire one shot because of electronics these other supposedly equal tanks don't have.
They're not equal. You don't know what equal means.
I can think of a few that are far superior yeah, 1 is Russian and the other Brit
this is why we will never see the english tank in that s-hole called ukraine. bad for PR.
slava Bandera!!!
poland will get divided again.
prędzej rosja na kilka częsci. Znów będziemy w moskwie onuco
Brawo Polska 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍
Brawo PIS 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍
❤❤✌️
they are asking to be nuked.
No brawo brawo. Szkoda ze zapomnieli nam powiedzieć o kredycie zaciągniętym w Korei na 77 mdl PLN
A jakie to ma znaczenie człowieku wszyscy mają jakieś kredyty 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍✌️
@@jerzy2023 A takie że o czymś takim powinien komunikować MON a nie dziennikarze człowieku
A po co wszystko komunikować nie te czasy wróg patrzy 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍✌️
Abramsy to bardzo dobre pustynne czołgi, nie dla Polski. Polska nie posiada infrastruktury dostosowanej do Abramsów ... To nie są dobre czołgi dla Polski.
Weź to na logikę. Skoro jeździły po miękkich piaskach Iraku, to dlaczego nie mają jeździć po Naszych łąkach/lasach?
Acha no super, nie wiem tylko czy wiesz ,że Abrams został własnie zaprojektowany na Europejski teatr działań , zresztą patrząc po Twoim wpisie tak naprawde g... wiesz o tym czołgu.
@@PyzaBezFarszu nie żądaj od gościa niemożliwego, logika to nie jego dziedzina
Taa - Leo też był taki "the best", dopóki nie pojechał na Ukrainę :)
Trochę z tych "Leo" zostało zidentyfikowanych jako John Deere... Mało tego, ruskie już je niszczyły na Ukrainie, mimo że ich tam nie było 😂 Zresztą bieganie za czołgami na tyłach wroga, by je wysadzić, świadczy tylko o tym, że Ruskie nic zazwyczaj używanego w takim przypadku na nie nie mają - to jest taktyka partyzantów, a nie armii mającej się za drugą na świecie...
Na chwilę obecną potwierdzone jest straconych kilka Leo2 wersji 4. :) Czyli te najstarsze. Sa natomiast filmy jak Leo2 ver 6 spokojnie wytrzymuje uderzenia pocisków kierowanych i się wycofuje ;-)
@@PyzaBezFarszu😂
Without one's own production factory, even the best equipment is useless.
Poland will produce 800 K2PL in poland haha don't worry ~
@@김민성-h4i8u 또 한가지 기대할 수 있는 점은. 폴란드에서 전쟁이 나서 폴란드 공장에서 K2 생상력으로 힘들거나. 또는 생산 불능 상태가 되었을때 한국 공장에서 생산해서 보급이 가능 하겠죠. 한국도 한국에서 전쟁이 나서 K2 생산에 문제가 생겼을때 역으로 폴란드 공장에서 K2를 생산해서 그걸 수입해서 사용 할 수가 있겠죠. 양국 다 든든한 우군이 생기는 거죠.
K2's will be made in Poland and Abrams will have extensive maintneance facilities.
Is there really any value in tanks in modern warfare? Is there any utility worth investing expensive costs? Now that the defense and survivability are much lower than the cheap and fast-developing anti-tank weapons, is it really okay to spend money on tanks?
탱크 무용론이 있는데 탱크가 터지는곳에 보병밀어넣어보면 탱크의 가치를 알게될것이다
Tanks as part of the enemy's peer combat system are essential. I just need the right tactics to use them.if we had artificial intelligence
which will be reliable. it will be a group of combat vehicles and a headquarters with a crew of people. The combat vehicles will be lighter but there will be a hunt for a transmission core to destroy the decision center.for now, we are creating such an IT system, we call it "topaz", which will cause situational awareness on a completely different level.whoever or whatever device sees the enemy, everyone involved will know about him.crews will know where their own and where which enemy. the command will be able to choose with what to destroy the enemy.why hit enemy tanks with tanks. how can you destroy artillery with precision laser-guided projectiles.and enemy infantry entrenched first with cluster or thermobaric missiles.that's right, we haven't signed, like russia, korea, usa, a declaration not to use these weapons.
탱크는 그냥 필수 요소다. 점령지역에 파견해야 하기 때문에, 폭격은 일시적 해방일뿐. 미군이 탱크개발을 하고있는 이유
As long as they have infantry, artillery and close air support they will be necessary element of the battlefield.
@shahhin11 Oh, you're talking stupid things stupid.. I am Korean and I have been to the army. You can charge with infantry, but there are many sacrifices. Did you work on the front line in Korea and wonder if tanks will gain strength? It's best to go to the army and train yourself. Why you need a tank. It's good to defend, but it's the best weapon if you minimize the sacrifices of infantry and shoot at enemy troops hiding in tanks
LOL, best tanks in the world? One is old M1A1 - about as good as T-72B and the other is K2 - which is super expensive tank from South Korea known for heavy off the shelf parts use.
I believe the M1A1 are mostly for training purposes. They do have contracts for the lates variant of Abrams.
Wrong. The K2 tanks sent to Poland use a German Renk transmission, the rest of the tank is all manufactured and designed by Korea. The German transmission will soon be replaced with a Korean transmission and then the tank is 100% Korean.
Ten stary m1a1 jak mówisz ma być zmodernizowany do m1a2 sepv3 masz jeszcze coś do powiedzenia?
Дилетанты😂 думают что если много электроники и есть кондиционер то это самое главное в танке😂 в большой войне другие параметры нужны... Спутников не будет , ремонтные заводы будут разбиты и тд
Amatorem to jest twój kraj widać to jak sobie radzicie z ukraina I jakim sprzetem operujecie jakoś Ukraina nie narzeka na sprzęt otrzymany z Polski okazał się w dobrym stanie czego nie można powiedzieć o zardzewiałym ruskim złomie
what tanks offer better parameters?
@@jakubknopik9218украинскую армию мы уничтожили в первые месяцы войны а сейчас воюем с прокси армией НАТО... Украинское на этой войне только люди и то не все... Вы в курсе сколько поляков так называемых ,, наемников,, там погибает? Вы не увидите как их берут в плен , им режут головы и конечности... Тебе твоя пропаганда не рассказывает об этом? Ты должен верить в ржавое русское оружие😂
@@fr0y505длительность и интенсивность современной войны требует от техники высочайшей надежности и вместе с тем ремонтопригодность в полевых условиях... Техника НАТО хороша но только против заведомо слабого противника.. В глобальном противостоянии с использованием всей номенклатуры оружия , уничтожения спутниковой групировки , с уничтожением тыловых оборонных и ремонтных предприятий , внесет корректировы в военную доктрину.. Стоимость и сроки восстановления и производства будут играть основную роль.. Много что изменится... И кто бы что не говорил но для нас сейчас важно что мы проходим отличную тренировку , появилось очень много хороших офицеров младшего звена.. Такого опыта нет ни у одной армии.. Мы за это платим кровью но в будущем это позволит нам существенно сократить потери и врагу нанести поражение... Вы же знаете наверное что после Украины американцы кинут в бой поляков и прибалтов? Вот там и посмотрите на этот корейский танк😂
@@mazafaka7242właśnie zniszczyliście swój kraj na dziesięciolecia a ty się jeszcze z tego cieszysz. Macie największy kraj na świecie, z największymi zasobami a ciągle atakujecie sąsiadów. Politycy was okradają, okłamują, a wy wierzycie że to dla dobra ojczyzny. Włącz myślenie.
mini M1A2 = K2
mini M1A2=K1
mini m1 = k1
mini m1a1 = k1a1
mini m1a2 sep ver. = k2
@@dingdingdangdong read about it again. m1 = leo2 = from kpz70= k1= leo1/m1
LOL! Leos are the best
K2 best tank on earth? pleseeeee😅🤣
Jealousy Jap, 走行中に軌道が離脱する戦車を持つ国は羨ましいです。
何文句あるの？
@@piotrbratek3996 tak, stoja na półce i czekają aż Dudu je kupi. Prosze cię.
Like Good Korea k9 k2 천무239 👍🇰🇷
damn old japanese tank
one thing is sure
jap tank shit
leopard 2 was also the best nato tank until it met russian weaponry. similarly with uk challengers so good brits told ukrainians not to use it in any dangerous battles only for parades and as back up way behind the infantry forces.
Ale jesteś poniżej normy, dobrze, że Ukraincy mają polskie PT-91, no one nie mogą być gorsze od tych ruskich...
@@kamilzakrocki1406 pt91 czy 92 jak przejedzie sie po minie albo spotka Koroneta lub Lanceta to bedzie po zawodach. czasy rudego 102 dawno minely.
@@robertduklus6555 tak samo jak ruskie czołgi, które są nic nie warte, wg ciebie.
Bełkot kremlowski
ah yes the wisdom of russian watnik xD
M1 Abrams w nieznanej kofiguracji ani wersji - serwis koszmar i masa, któa sprawi że będą stacjonarne oraz K2 które od frontu przebijają rosyjskie pociski przeciwpancerne a z boku i z tyłu to papier a nie pancerz. Dużo zachwytu tylko nie wiadomo nad czym.
Bzdura...hahahaha
Dlatego powstanie K2PL
@@robertkowalski7932 czyli co powstanie? Bo nie ma żadnych uzgodnień. Najważniejsze to że pancerza nie da się wymienić na mocniejszy
Chyba nie zrozumiałeś tego co gość powiedział w filmie. K2 wytrzyma frontalne uderzenie pocisku wystrzelonego z działa nawet 120mm. Co do swojej wagi, są najbardziej mobilne... nie wspomnę już o ulepszeniach pancerza, który jeszcze Polacy przerobią pod wersję K2PL. W dodatku będziemy produkować je sami u siebie ;-) Czego chcieć więcej?
Co do samych Abramsów, na pustyniach w Iraku dawały sobie radę a u nas nie dadzą? Przestań czytać powielane bzdury przez moskiewską agenturę.
@@PyzaBezFarszu nie wciskaj mi działania zgodnie z czyjąś myślał czy w ramach czyjejś agentury.
K2 nie da się dopancerzyć i koniec. Pogadaj z kimś z branży to może Ci to wytłumaczy. Zostaje tylko pancerz reaktywny.
Abram na pustyni nie musiał przejeżdżać przez mosty, a u nas musi i to sporo. Niestety nie ma u nas wielu mostów które uniosą wersję SAP3.
Best on Earth??? 🤣🤣🤣
Otherwise only Thrid World weak countries build army based mainly on import!
People Republik of Poland (Communist Poland) had 400tys sodiers, and 4000 tanks with own production!
madrzejsze o tym nie wspominac, to wcale nie podobne, wcale.
Glos rosadku!
To prawda. Ale czy rzeczywiście były to polskie czołgi? Czy Polacy mieli wpływ na to gdzie te czołgi pojadą i w którą stronę będą strzelać? Jak silna była gospodarka PRL? Ja trochę pamiętam tamte czasy choć byłem wtedy dzieckiem.
slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre
@@kjererrrt2381 Сколько стоит лук в России?
Веками русская армия была насильниками и ворами. Ничего не меняется. Видимо, сиденья для унитазов в России подешевели?
Question: What would you do if a polish soldier throws you a granade?
Answer: You pull the pin of granade, and throw him back
If you see polish solider on real, yor pants will be full
Have you ever seen a Polish soldier akhmad? You would be in your so called heaven (hell in reality).
And an anchor in the ass for those who liked it...
If you see Polish soldier, that would be last thing you have seen in your life Sadam.😂😂😂
typical tik tok pedo force logic...
A real shame to see Poland that has been flooded with European subventions since the eighties buy tanks outside europe. There were three choices, the Challenger, Leopard and Leclerc.
To buy from one agressor and 2 traitors from the past?? No thanks.
Leopard? It is made by the are Russian ally. It's European open secret.
Germany has been flooded with easy money earned in Poland and in Eastern Europe. We know it and you know it.
Poland good decision to buy Abrams and Black Panters!
france is untrustworthy, unreliable.... germany is untrustworthy, unreliable (as war in Ukraine swhowed) and they collaborated with russians to co-dominate our region again.... UK has no capacity to fill our needs in numbers
Challenger, Leopard, Leclerc are either models that are fading away, industry has no capacity of building them in numbers or have substantial flaws in their core designs
also.... "subventions" - these are in rality LOANS... why do people in west dont understand it is beyond me... besides from these loans 'western' or 'old EU' countries benefit the most, as stated by german statistics bureou, yoshka fisher, and it is estimated that germany alone benefits of combined markets 5x the ammount of they put in
so ye.... stop spreading ignorant BS
Soon Poland will be without cash to hold that expensive toys! With so many types.
It's more support for American and Korean heavy industries, instead Polish abilities to defend itself for longer period :/
source: Trust me bro!
Poland have no way to get Armata, so they are getting 2nd and 3rd best option ;) Maybe 3rd and 4th, since Merkava IV is probably better than both those in this video. But it's funny how you people find some random crap and present it as the best of the best. LOL!
LMAO
Witzbold!! Seit 20 Jahren bekommen die den Motor nicht hin! Schrott
Armata will only get a shot at being the 'best' tank if it actually makes it off the production line lol
Considerign even Russian army has no way to get armata i wouldn't consider it no 1 xD poor watnik.
u mean they NEVER get the worst tank of all , the armata? thats not a bad thing i would say lol
케이투 를 이길 전차가 없습니다 맞붙어 보면 알수 있을 것입니다
hehe wc
M1이 간지나긴한다..
LMFAO @ 2 BEST
NO SUCH THING
THERE IS ONLY 1 TOP DOG
Some argue that Markava could actually be better than Abrams …. Any thoughts ? ;)
@@hetman3196The Merkava was created to murder civilians, and the armor is created to protect against HEAT shells. So Merkava is worse.