I can't see England winning unless NZ's discipline falters. Their scrum still lacks the power necessary to dominate that of the ABs. They were monstered back in July, and I can't see that changing now. Not to mention NZ's forward pack has become even better since then with Tupou Vaai finding his feet, Taylor being on fire, Sititi's inclusion, and Sam Cane's return. Any victory by England will have to come from the backs, which a 6-2 split does not compliment. The addition of Ford does bode well for them late game, but with Clarke's return, their ability to attack both wings has taken a hit. And lastly, the coaching reshuffle bts could have some detrimental effects on England's performance. I also wouldnt be surprised if Marler's jest towards the haka gives the ABs ammunition to perform.
Interesting how the Bokke have gone for a relatively soft EOYT and ABs all out. Could be a master stroke by Razor over the long run. If we are completely honest the ABs are the better side across the 23 and should win. How many England players would make the ABs 23 maybe 4 or 5.
I don’t really go along with the ‘long layoff’ theory. Teams that are organised can maintain physical standards in training and, for the most part, it really comes down to the best selected team on the day. There is a tendency to talk about teams being match fit but often the factor is really a bit of trial and error in finding the right combination. In terms of this, England have picked a more physical side than previously - picking Curry at open side - and having the 6-2 split to maintain this for a full 80. NZ has changed four members of the starting pack since they last played England and players like Vaa’i and Sititi, especially, are in form. England are clearly targeting NZ’s 'last 20 minutes’ as you have identified. However, this has been improving slightly for NZ in the last couple of matches. They weren’t scoreless at least while players like Tuipolutu and Tosi offer some driving threat from the bench that wasn’t there previously. It may also be a factor that McKenzie may simply be effective from the bench. The key, for NZ, is how the backdown finishes. I am hoping they take Cane off - partially because he retiring soon and the team needs to find a replacement anyway, but also because I want to see them finish with Finau at 6, Savea at 7 and Sititi at 8. I am slightly surprised you picked England but I respect your perspective. I just think that NZ has a few more things in reserve that hasn’t been seen this year yet.
I think you are possibly right about the long layoff, it's defo not a good thing, like 5-6 weeks? as long as we beat Ireland, and or France, I'm not too worried, I just wish next year's RC would come faster so we can take on the Bokke again!! And before a SA fan calls me a traitor again, yes, we believe we are the GOATS also😁 it might be arrogant to say, but there's really only two teams that are in the GOAT convo and its AB's and SA.
I’m sorry, I’m a kiwi and we pretty much all wish Bauden wasn’t there. Love him to bits but his time has passed. In all honesty, there isn’t a lot of hype here about the tour, it really is just another “end of year” tour that no one actually gives two hoots about, although it would be a shame to see England go from EIGHT historical wins, to an entire NINE 🫣. But as I said, I don’t think this holds a lot of interest for most Kiwis, we’ve already had our true tests this year, and we lost. Good luck to the boys anyhow.
I can't see England winning unless NZ's discipline falters. Their scrum still lacks the power necessary to dominate that of the ABs. They were monstered back in July, and I can't see that changing now. Not to mention NZ's forward pack has become even better since then with Tupou Vaai finding his feet, Taylor being on fire, Sititi's inclusion, and Sam Cane's return.
Any victory by England will have to come from the backs, which a 6-2 split does not compliment. The addition of Ford does bode well for them late game, but with Clarke's return, their ability to attack both wings has taken a hit.
And lastly, the coaching reshuffle bts could have some detrimental effects on England's performance. I also wouldnt be surprised if Marler's jest towards the haka gives the ABs ammunition to perform.
Bro, you have broken my heart! LOL, how could you do this to we AB's fans! England by one point, noooooooo!
I am picking AB's 22 to Engerland 17.
I hope I eat my words. But i’ve got a feeling….👀
@@KickOnRugby if All blacks win no braiis with the boys for a month
Interesting how the Bokke have gone for a relatively soft EOYT and ABs all out. Could be a master stroke by Razor over the long run. If we are completely honest the ABs are the better side across the 23 and should win. How many England players would make the ABs 23 maybe 4 or 5.
if NZ can get back to an 80 minute team they will win a lot, good thing is its fixable
I don’t really go along with the ‘long layoff’ theory. Teams that are organised can maintain physical standards in training and, for the most part, it really comes down to the best selected team on the day. There is a tendency to talk about teams being match fit but often the factor is really a bit of trial and error in finding the right combination.
In terms of this, England have picked a more physical side than previously - picking Curry at open side - and having the 6-2 split to maintain this for a full 80. NZ has changed four members of the starting pack since they last played England and players like Vaa’i and Sititi, especially, are in form.
England are clearly targeting NZ’s 'last 20 minutes’ as you have identified. However, this has been improving slightly for NZ in the last couple of matches. They weren’t scoreless at least while players like Tuipolutu and Tosi offer some driving threat from the bench that wasn’t there previously. It may also be a factor that McKenzie may simply be effective from the bench. The key, for NZ, is how the backdown finishes. I am hoping they take Cane off - partially because he retiring soon and the team needs to find a replacement anyway, but also because I want to see them finish with Finau at 6, Savea at 7 and Sititi at 8.
I am slightly surprised you picked England but I respect your perspective. I just think that NZ has a few more things in reserve that hasn’t been seen this year yet.
I think you are possibly right about the long layoff, it's defo not a good thing, like 5-6 weeks? as long as we beat Ireland, and or France, I'm not too worried, I just wish next year's RC would come faster so we can take on the Bokke again!! And before a SA fan calls me a traitor again, yes, we believe we are the GOATS also😁 it might be arrogant to say, but there's really only two teams that are in the GOAT convo and its AB's and SA.
I’m sorry, I’m a kiwi and we pretty much all wish Bauden wasn’t there. Love him to bits but his time has passed.
In all honesty, there isn’t a lot of hype here about the tour, it really is just another “end of year” tour that no one actually gives two hoots about, although it would be a shame to see England go from EIGHT historical wins, to an entire NINE 🫣.
But as I said, I don’t think this holds a lot of interest for most Kiwis, we’ve already had our true tests this year, and we lost.
Good luck to the boys anyhow.
Speak for yourself bud and not ‘all kiwis’. BB is in form, and any real lovers of rugby are VERY excited for this tour. Huge matches ahead!
@@ConnorMac 100% m8!, what a load of nonsence!
What did Big Ethan do wrong ?😮😅
What's the scored card at Fortress Twickenham between the two sides?
Stacked in NZ favour. Last time Eng beat NZ at Twickenham was 2012. Wild