The Merkava Main Battle Tank - Tank Overview/Opinions

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
  • The Merkava series of main battle tanks are used by the Israel Defense Forces. The name comes from Hebrew: "chariot". The tank began development in 1973 and entered official service in 1978. Four main variants of the tank have been deployed. It was first used extensively in the 1982 Lebanon War. The name "Merkava" was derived from the IDF's initial development program name.
    The Mark I, operational since 1978, is the original design created as a result of Israel Tal's decision, and was fabricated and designed for mass production. The Mark I weighed 63 tonnes and had a 900 horsepower (670 kW) diesel engine, with a power-to-weight ratio of 14 hp/ton. It was armed with the 105 millimeter M68 main gun (a licensed copy of the British Royal Ordnance L7), two 7.62 mm machine guns for anti-infantry defense, and a 60 mm mortar mounted externally, with its operator not completely protected by the tank's hull.
    The Mark II was first introduced into general service in April 1983. While fundamentally the same as the Merkava Mark I, it incorporated numerous small adjustments as a result of the previous year's incursion into Lebanon. The new tank was optimized for urban warfare and low intensity conflicts, with a weight and engine no greater than the Mark I
    The Merkava Mark III was introduced in December 1989 and was in production until 2003. As of 2016, the Merkava III is by far the most numerous tank in frontline IDF service. Compared to the Merkava II, it has upgrades to the drivetrain, powertrain, armament, and electronic systems. The most prominent addition was the incorporation of the locally developed IMI 120 mm gun. This gun and a larger 1,200 horsepower (890 kW) diesel engine increased the total weight of the tank to 65 tonnes (143,000 lb), but the larger engine increased the maximum cruising speed to 60 km/h (37 mph)
    The Mark IV is the most recent variant of the Merkava tank that has been in development since 1999 and production since 2004. The upgrade's development was announced in an October 1999 edition of the Bamachaneh ("At the Camp") military publication. However, the Merkava Mark III remained in production until 2003. The first Merkava IVs were in production in limited numbers by the end of 2004.
    Hope you enjoy!!
    💥 💣 Check out our partnership clothing brand! Attire For Effect💣 💥 www.attireforeffect.com 📸 Also follow them on Instagram: # attire_for_effect
    💰 Want to support my channel? Check out my Patreon Donation page! www.patreon.co...
    💰PayPal: paypal.me/Mats...
    Matt’s DREAM: www.gofundme.c...
    👕 Check out my Merch: teespring.com/...
    📬Wanna send me something? My PO Box: Matthew James 210A - 12A Street N Suite No. 135 Lethbridge Alberta Canada T1H2J
    📸 My instagram: Matt_matsimus
    🎮 Twitch: / matsimus_9033
    👋DISCORD: / discord
    📘 Facebook: www.facebook.c...
    🐦Twitter: / matsimusgaming
    Merkava Main Battle Tank

Комментарии • 2 тыс.

  • @patricklundstrom8376
    @patricklundstrom8376 8 лет назад +418

    The door and crew compartment isn't MAINLY used for carrying troops, but to carry crews from knocked out tanks back to safety.

    • @karlp8484
      @karlp8484 8 лет назад +22

      Sounds like a very specific and limited role for such a versatile space? That's one potential function for sure, but as the video points out, it's multi-purpose.

    • @עמיחיגרוס-ה8ה
      @עמיחיגרוס-ה8ה 8 лет назад +83

      True! I myself was a "troop"(infantry medic) and took a ride in the compartment back to safety. it's not fun and definatly not the main use. it's a usefull feature IF NEEDED

    • @ristomladich246
      @ristomladich246 8 лет назад +8

      the mi 28 has a storage compartment for downed crew. it can hold 3 people safely.

    • @patricklundstrom8376
      @patricklundstrom8376 8 лет назад +81

      Karl P Israel is obsessed with keeping their soldiers alive. You can always build more tanks, but the crew takes 18-20 years to replace.

    • @patricklundstrom8376
      @patricklundstrom8376 8 лет назад +1

      Risto Mladich But probably not comfortable. ;)

  • @VerdigrisTrees
    @VerdigrisTrees 7 лет назад +357

    Technicals aside that tank is beautiful looking

    • @williamh.1519
      @williamh.1519 6 лет назад +26

      It is beautiful because it works. Form follows function.

    • @angus3963
      @angus3963 6 лет назад +15

      You should see it in person, absolutely gorgeous!

    • @isopod365
      @isopod365 6 лет назад +10

      @@angus3963:
      Have you seen it yourself?
      If yes, then lucky you
      I want to see it in person as well ._.

    • @trespire
      @trespire 5 лет назад +10

      I have seen them in person. The Mark 4 is an engineering masterpiece to behold, almost a work of art in steel.

    • @mosesjrnkandu7819
      @mosesjrnkandu7819 5 лет назад +7

      SilencedPotato I think it’s the best design tank in looks

  • @hoffmanstream1107
    @hoffmanstream1107 8 лет назад +743

    Don't forget the crew suits are air conditioned ... chilled crew works better in the desert ....

    • @leronbenari226
      @leronbenari226 8 лет назад +5

      Offir Hoffman kool

    • @wolfpack7195
      @wolfpack7195 8 лет назад +9

      all up armored vehicles are A/C controlled

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 7 лет назад +7

      AC often comes along with NBC protection

    • @largol33t1
      @largol33t1 7 лет назад +5

      How do they do that? Does each suit have a self-contained chilling unit OR are they hooked up to a main unit? It just sounds cumbersome when in the cramped room of a tank...

    • @LukasJosai
      @LukasJosai 7 лет назад +7

      Well probobly hooked up to a central one, but it is probably better because they can have hatches open and still be cool.

  • @NikolaiRomanovsk
    @NikolaiRomanovsk 8 лет назад +490

    after the merkava finishes its role as a mbt it becomes an apc. reusability ×10

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +79

      Good point! Thanks for watching! :-)

    • @manjirum
      @manjirum 8 лет назад +8

      Matsimus Gaming Chariot amirite?

    • @MishkaVinetsky
      @MishkaVinetsky 7 лет назад +1

      exact

    • @NimDod
      @NimDod 7 лет назад +23

      Currently, they are working on making heavy APCs out of Merkava mk2 going out of service, and chassis for the new howitzer that the IDF will use to replace its old ones

    • @tino897
      @tino897 7 лет назад +14

      This. Since all of the world hates on russia im gonna say how Israel actually does the right thing. The russians dont just design a brand new system rather just upgrade an old one or reuse it. Israel do it too and look what briliant things they make. I am really astonished by the IDF. :)

  • @doctim111
    @doctim111 6 лет назад +91

    Their Trophy anti-missile system is awesome - it's being installed on M2 Abrams now

    • @Omega4Productions
      @Omega4Productions 5 лет назад +6

      I thought it was being incorporated into the M1A3, not the A2?

    • @KrypticWarrior2
      @KrypticWarrior2 5 лет назад +6

      it’s being put on the latest iterations of the M1A2, the C and D as they are now being called. im sure the trophy system will be more itegrated into the M1A3 instead of being more “slapped” on like it is now

    • @merkavamkivm5156
      @merkavamkivm5156 4 года назад +4

      I'm so good that other tanks are copying me ;)

    • @EJ257IHI
      @EJ257IHI 4 года назад +1

      @@merkavamkivm5156 It is, isn't it? :)

    • @imperialguardsman5929
      @imperialguardsman5929 3 года назад +1

      @@merkavamkivm5156 stfu you're still no match for the glorious Bob Semple tabk

  • @skyhawkthegerbila-4977
    @skyhawkthegerbila-4977 8 лет назад +87

    Israel's armour doctrine is based on protection of the crew due to Iareal's relatively low population throughout it's existence, to them there is no point in having a tank without a crew to control it.

    • @העבד
      @העבד 5 лет назад +2

      Well this kind of is opposite to the infantry doctrine of israel, I served as IDF airborne and i can tell you the doctrine pretty much regards infantry as cannon fodder.

    • @safwansaid5139
      @safwansaid5139 5 лет назад

      israel have around 8.2 million people, atleast half of that or less than half are doing millitary servic from permanent to national service requirement. they have abundance of men and women to juggle around. their doctrine consists of perpetual state of paranoia against enemies on every side. you can easily cripple israel with spamming tonnes of fire and forget missiles since their country is dense. but they do have good anti air and anti air ballistic counter measure (iron dome)

    • @shocktnc
      @shocktnc 4 года назад

      As it should be!

    • @Medicus_Asur
      @Medicus_Asur 3 года назад

      That Hamas pepe KEK

    • @slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght5447
      @slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght5447 3 года назад +5

      @@safwansaid5139 "you can easily cripple israel with spamming tonnes of fire" if that were true, then israel would have lost in 1973. it was outnumbered about 10 to 1 in men adn artillery, and 20 to 1 in tanks at the beginning in the northern front
      adn even if you don't believe these numbers, if it were so easy, then one of their enemies would have done it already

  • @leandro9311
    @leandro9311 8 лет назад +461

    Engine on front, modular armour, APS system, able to carry up to 4 soldier´s, one of the few Western MBT´s to carry and use missile systems with his main gun wich is a 120mm, good mobility and of-road capabilities and excelent combat field management and firing computerr systems, extensive use in combat and batle proven, the Trophy APS system was also extensively used during Protective Edge in 2014 were it defeated several Kornet ATGM´s and RPG-27´s, probably some of the most deadly anti-tank weapons in the world, the Merkava is my favorite

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +67

      Leandro Ribeiro it's a great tank for sure :-) I would say the most battle proven tank in the world for sure. Thanks for watching and have a great day!!

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 8 лет назад +5

      You 2 mate

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 8 лет назад +7

      ***** Yah, its like, don´t sell them to the Israelis because it will worsen the relations with Israel-Arab world instead we are going to sell them to the Arab world ad everthing will be ok !!

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 8 лет назад +17

      At that point, Israel sayd, listen, we don´t wan´t your stupid weapons with your stupid politics and we are sick of the low standard´s your tanks provide us with so we are going to do our own tank and you are going to eat our dust (litteraly)

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 8 лет назад +9

      ***** Yah, Israel was at the time being constantly etheir at war or being threaten by some of the bigest military power´s in the world something so unreliable like the Chieftain would be dissastress

  • @the7observer
    @the7observer 8 лет назад +221

    4:08 - I do believe Israel used Centurion tanks armed with 105mm gun in the 6 day war

    • @LupusAries
      @LupusAries 8 лет назад +18

      And even more importantly in the Yom-Kippur War as the Scho't Kal, Osprey wrote a rather good little book about it, in the Duel Series, Duel: Centurion vs T-55 - Yom Kippur War 1973.
      ospreypublishing.com/centurion-vs-t-55-pb
      In the Six day war they still used the Scho't Meteor (Centurion with the original Meteor engine), and they weren't to happy about that engine.
      Also they still use engineer vehicles based on the Centurion, the Puma, and allegedly still have their centurion variants in reserve.

    • @ikabody
      @ikabody 8 лет назад +24

      Israels Centurions did very well indeed against the Syrian T55's, especially when you consider the odds.

    • @leronbenari226
      @leronbenari226 8 лет назад +17

      ikabody In the 6 day war one tank commander with 12 tanks held a entire Syrian brigade.

    • @punicwars2
      @punicwars2 8 лет назад +8

      wrong war. you are talking about Avigdor Cahalany. its the yum kippor war

    • @grahamariss2111
      @grahamariss2111 8 лет назад +12

      the7observer They used the Centurion in both the 6 day and Yum Kippor, and remains heavily modified in service today wit IDF for secondary tasks such as mobile observation post.

  • @WizzRacing
    @WizzRacing 8 лет назад +181

    The Merkava fits Israel, As it's not world power. It's goal is to defend the state of Israel. It's mission is to survive and win. Nothing more. This is why the tank was designed to carry troops, so that infantry can be ready to dismount anti tank scouts, recon, anti air defense and even serve as an NBC retreat for infantry. As it's budget is not $300 billion or one that includes intervention into other countries.
    I would add. This tank has more tricks up the sleeve then you mentioned. One being laser detection range finding systems that target it. It can pin point just where it come from and release countermeasures to blind it. As well as return fire from not just one source but all on the field of battle. As the systems are integrated division wide. Plus a few more.

    • @aaronoriain229
      @aaronoriain229 6 лет назад +8

      Claude Rains yeah “home security and border defence” but the border is continually moving outwards into land that is not theirs by law nor by right🤔

    • @aaronoriain229
      @aaronoriain229 6 лет назад +4

      Their claimed capital was directly central in the Palestinian land divided up by the UN in 1947 as Palestine they just invaded and annexed their way to it

    • @justwayne4785
      @justwayne4785 6 лет назад +29

      Snoop Doge Jews had their home there long before the Arabs, the land was shit and not wanted until the Jewish people improved it over the years, then the Arabs decided they wanted what wasn’t theirs as usual and have since then.

    • @karminderghuman4348
      @karminderghuman4348 6 лет назад +1

      Wow!

    • @RTmadnesstoo
      @RTmadnesstoo 6 лет назад +6

      @@aaronoriain229 Losers lies !

  • @R0MULUS97
    @R0MULUS97 8 лет назад +121

    Haha the turret looks like a mini Millennium Falcon

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +19

      Peter Tran haha kinda does actually! :-D. tanks for watching! Feel free to subscribe :-)

    • @adelomar3929
      @adelomar3929 4 года назад

      Or predator alien head

    • @tearjusensei9921
      @tearjusensei9921 4 года назад

      You are anti semitic

    • @Type90-IIM
      @Type90-IIM 3 года назад

      @@tearjusensei9921 How are they Anti-Semitic?

    • @tearjusensei9921
      @tearjusensei9921 3 года назад

      @@Type90-IIM you are anti sematic.....get it??? (We cant condemn jews)or you will be call that

  • @Ben-ky9xu
    @Ben-ky9xu 5 лет назад +11

    That extra room in the tank also increases the crew comfort as well and a well rested crew translates to increased combat efficiency. The point here is that while your right about how it seems to make more sense to not design in the area for the dismounts and perhaps make the tank smaller or more protected, that space isn't going to waste.

  • @007999999999999999
    @007999999999999999 8 лет назад +431

    At 7:52 the antenna snaps right off xD

    • @ShopeeMarketteam
      @ShopeeMarketteam 7 лет назад +18

      Yeah lmao saw that and spat my drink

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 7 лет назад +91

      Not an antenna. It's a rubber stick to show the driver where are the corners of the tank while driving.

    • @viktoriyaserebryakov2755
      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755 6 лет назад +62

      Still feel like it's suppose to not fall off though.

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 6 лет назад +13

      Viktoriya Serebryakov Often soldiers with the brain of a mid-school teenager play with and damage military equipment. This is the outcome.

    • @MrPobanz
      @MrPobanz 6 лет назад +12

      Military equipment is (should be) designed to not be broken, even by a mid-schooler. Not been in an actual battle situation, but even during training, your equipment has to endure a lot, may it be a vehicle or equipment.

  • @andraslibal
    @andraslibal 4 года назад +6

    I met a Merkava instructor once. She was surprised how much I knew about the tank. There are 4 Merkavas displayed at the Latrun (Yad La Shiryon) tank museum in Israel and one IFV based on the Merkava. Also numerous other tanks ... worth visiting.

  • @adarkalo5020
    @adarkalo5020 6 лет назад +11

    As a Merkava mk. 3 LOADER I can say I love this tank it preforms great!

  • @IDFArmor
    @IDFArmor 8 лет назад +27

    i was actually shocked at the amount of research that went into this... color me impressed!
    liked and subbed!

  • @AngusCuthbertson
    @AngusCuthbertson 8 лет назад +28

    The additional crew space isn't intended to be used in the same way as a IFV. It's the ammunition storage. If a allied tank gets hit and the crew bails out, they can empty most of the ammunition storage and put the crew in there instead. Since the "saviour" tank at that point barely has any ammo left it will get out back to a safe place to drop the (probably) injured crew off and replenish ammo.

    • @Temp0raryName
      @Temp0raryName 4 года назад +2

      @@cejannuzi If you read through the comments above, you will find the way that they 'empty the ammunition', under such situations, is to send it downrange. But, yea, there is still the issue that the storage cases themselves will be blocking most of the space.

  • @jeffgaboury3157
    @jeffgaboury3157 7 лет назад +27

    Interesting video. A couple of things though. At the beginning, you imply that the Israelis were not sold the Centurion tank. Did you mean Chieftain? The Chieftain was a tank that they wanted to buy, but the British backed out due to political pressure. The Centurion, on the other hand, was used by Israel in very large numbers and was one of their favourite tanks in the 60's and 70's and used by them into the 80's. As a matter of fact, the first prototype of the Merkava was actually a highly modified Centurion! Also, the large area at the back and its door is primarily used for a massive load of ammunition, far larger than competing tanks. In an emergency, the ammo load can be reduced to transport troops or casualties, but it's a very secondary use of the space.

    • @sdslofi1107
      @sdslofi1107 5 лет назад

      Yeah the Merkava was always known as a multi role MBT. Being a APC and/or battlefield ambulance if need be. The Scottish Koala's video has a more in depth view on this MBT and it's systems.

  • @lockedon8953
    @lockedon8953 5 лет назад +15

    The Merkava is definitely one of my favorite MBTs in the world

  • @ConductorDon
    @ConductorDon 3 месяца назад +2

    It was the chieftain that the UK ended up not selling them. They had many centurions. They added local upgrades to them. Israeli centurions were called Shot Kals.

  • @jtc120880
    @jtc120880 8 лет назад +22

    Good review - I've personally always liked the look of the Merkava, sleek and deadly. I do think having the capability to be flexible re the troop compartment is a plus rather than a minus though. Been looking forward to this one ever since I suggested it :)

  • @kennymedic58
    @kennymedic58 8 лет назад +190

    Like everything in use with the IDF it has been well thought out, not like a lot of the crap that the British army has had in the past. I don't think Israel makes any bad military equipment.

    • @danineira366
      @danineira366 8 лет назад +8

      Kenny Smith apart from the fact that most of its equipment is extremely situational the merkeva out side of the terrain it's built for well be outperformed by any modern MBT

    • @kennymedic58
      @kennymedic58 8 лет назад +45

      I don't think Israel has any plans of fighting out sided of its local area so as i said, the tank is well thought out and is perfect for their needs.

    • @beaujeste1
      @beaujeste1 8 лет назад +13

      Not read the Project for a Greater Israel documents? It includes most of Syria, Lebanon and parts of Iraq as well as the theft of Palestine and Gaza.
      Hence the attempt at regime change and destabilsation of Syria...

    • @bm2041
      @bm2041 8 лет назад +55

      beau jeste lol....Yes ... that's why Israel returned the Sinai Straits in the 80s. 3 times the surface all the State of Israel ... and that's why in 1994 Israel gave to "Palestinians" some control of Judea and Samaria .. and in 2005 Israel left Gaza and evacuated Jewish settlements....project for Israel greater lol..... ..You have to learn more .. maybe stupidity pass... Allahu Akbar.. lol Because of ignorance like you people fighting ....And that's sad.

    • @100500daniel
      @100500daniel 8 лет назад +11

      beau jeste thats a conspiracy...

  • @leronbenari226
    @leronbenari226 8 лет назад +72

    "Awesome to listen to your troops" that's pretty cool that Israel does that my dad was one of the first people that tested the galil.

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 6 лет назад +3

      Jesus Anaya jesus = judean.

    • @dannygelbart6827
      @dannygelbart6827 6 лет назад +3

      @Jesus Anaya, Waiting till RUclips sees all your comments and you get banned. Trash like you shouldn't be allowed near a public forum.

    • @doctim111
      @doctim111 6 лет назад +1

      Galil's are great but a bit heavy, no?

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 6 лет назад

      doctim111 galils are retired for over two decades now. So I can't say. The current x-95 is 3.9kg

    • @mouly
      @mouly 6 лет назад

      the galil not in use for 20 years I think. It's old. Today the armi uses Tavor as main gun. The Galil or the smaller version called glilon are kind of Ak47.

  • @fatyowls
    @fatyowls 7 лет назад +13

    I do like your rhetoric concerning weapons procurement, absolutely agree with you 100%.

  • @OSTmm
    @OSTmm 3 года назад +2

    Possibly one of the coolest tank designs I've ever seen.

  • @majorzbzzn
    @majorzbzzn 8 лет назад +4

    Great video! I am really happy I found your channel, lots of good info all around. A few comments about this video:
    1) The correct pronunciation of the name is with emphasis on the last A. In Hebrew you can have emphasis either on the last syllable or the one before last. In this case its the last.
    2) The main design guideline for the tank was not the tank survivability but the crew survivability (this is probably what you meant but this is important). You have to understand the IDF mentality where the live of a single soldier is the most important thing. The compartment in the rear for infantry is part of that mentality. One tank can rescue the injured crew of another and so on.
    3) The initial design of the tank was based off the two Chieftain tanks sent by the UK.
    4) Merkava MK4 comes with the Trophy defense system as a standard.
    Sometimes when comparing tanks we look at just the features on paper. This tank was designed with the sole purpose of defending the state of Israel. It is suited to work with the Israeli terrain and with the Israeli mentality (for example I don't think it has any fording ability simply because this is not an issue in the Israeli terrain).
    Thanks again for making the video, looking forward to your next videos.

  • @elvinmadson
    @elvinmadson 8 лет назад +4

    I just recently subscribed to your channel. What brought me here was your videos on Tanks and AFVs IRL. I really like the emphasis of fact and information, and not opinion. These videos are well produced and extremely entertaining/ informative. Great work! you keep making these and I'll keep watching.

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад

      ElvinSonofMad thanks so much! Really glad you liked it! Thanks for following me and stay tuned for more. Have a great day!

  • @smeminem1258
    @smeminem1258 5 лет назад +21

    Merkava doctrine we prioritize crew survivability over all because a crew is the most valuable asset
    Russian tank doctrine:YOOOooooo we have like... a lot of people

    • @okiedokie6595
      @okiedokie6595 4 года назад +2

      Kick start the soviet anthem dammit

    • @badgermcbadger1968
      @badgermcbadger1968 3 года назад +2

      Not anymore since tank training became much more expensive and complex

    • @mikailvito7200
      @mikailvito7200 3 года назад

      Russia population has been decreasing since WW2.

  • @leronbenari226
    @leronbenari226 8 лет назад +50

    My dad was a tank crewmen in the yom kipor war. He said the worst threat was a Egyptian hornet missle that was controlled by a wire with a missle and to counter it they fired all their machine guns at the missle.

    • @Mortjep9531
      @Mortjep9531 8 лет назад +1

      so it's a missile controlled by another missile with a wire in between?

    • @happyflea
      @happyflea 8 лет назад +3

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9M14_Malyutka

    • @EJ257IHI
      @EJ257IHI 6 лет назад +2

      My father was there too, in a Patton M60. The missile you're referring to is the AT Sager, nasty stuff.

    • @Trust_The_Plan
      @Trust_The_Plan 6 лет назад

      Who won the Yom Kippur War in your eyes guys? Be honest please.
      Immo Egypt reached all its objectives and won back the Suez Canal plus the Sinai Peninsula. While Israel the first time hade large casualties and the feeling fighting a new kind of enemy who does not run off.

    • @littlebigfish9205
      @littlebigfish9205 6 лет назад +2

      The egyptians cheated... and yet... still lost the war... now that's talented...

  • @henryatkinson1479
    @henryatkinson1479 4 года назад +2

    4:00 They did buy centurions. In fact, the Merkava uses a reverse engineered version of the Centurion's running gear. Israel wanted to buy Chieftains before Merkava was developed, but after their crimes against Egypt and Syria, Britain refused to sell to them.

  • @TastingwithTonyShow
    @TastingwithTonyShow 8 лет назад +2

    The reconfigurable ammo compartment and rear door are great features that give the vehicle flexibility today and lots of options to repurpose the vehicle in the future i.e. IFV, command vehicle. It's probably good for crew morale that there's at least a chance of safety in another vehicle if you're wounded or stranded. It would also be a great way to transport certain assets around a battlefield such as senior commanders, SIGINT operators/gear, special forces. It's always interesting to see how Israel's unique strategic situation translates into military technology solutions. What seems irrational to others makes perfect sense if you're in the IDF.

  • @TakodachiTanker
    @TakodachiTanker 6 лет назад +4

    I'm currently an M1 tank driver and when we were learning V ID in training i fell in love with the Merkava. Dying to one day drive that beast.

    • @galchimovich6753
      @galchimovich6753 4 года назад

      ive heard that back in the ninties there was a drill between the Mekavas and Abrams, the Abrams went out of spare parts.
      not that i underestimate the abrams, it was built for plains and long distance conqure. the merkava built for Rocky areas.

  • @RedEffectChannel
    @RedEffectChannel 8 лет назад +7

    Awesome vid as always! I rly like ur tank overviews :D

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +2

      Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed it :-) Have a great day! :-D

    • @RedEffectChannel
      @RedEffectChannel 8 лет назад

      Matsimus Gaming Thanks. You too.

  • @Zandiv
    @Zandiv 6 лет назад +20

    Credit where it's due, I like it. Well done Israel.

  • @WorshipinIdols
    @WorshipinIdols 8 лет назад +1

    That rear door not only allows for much greater survivability but also gives the crew a great sense and knowledge of their safety allowing them to act much more aggressively and fearlessly on the battlefield.

  • @fishgaming9818
    @fishgaming9818 6 лет назад +15

    im gonna serve in one of these in 3 years or maybe even the next merkava :)

    • @crookim
      @crookim 3 года назад

      To kill palestinian children?

    • @fishgaming9818
      @fishgaming9818 3 года назад +10

      @@crookim exactly buddy can’t wait

    • @YoRHaUnit2Babe
      @YoRHaUnit2Babe 3 года назад

      @@fishgaming9818 more like their parents who throw their kids into gunfire and then screech out for the media.

    • @YoRHaUnit2Babe
      @YoRHaUnit2Babe 3 года назад +1

      @@fishgaming9818 it's not a warcrime if you can't get caught.

    • @YoRHaUnit2Babe
      @YoRHaUnit2Babe 3 года назад +1

      But tbh I really wish you good luck when you start serving under the international *idiots* that call themselves the Media

  • @sneakyfeats2353
    @sneakyfeats2353 3 года назад +3

    Merkava is by far my favorite tank. Top tier MBT with a rear hatch and room for a few guys. Even looks cool. Do a video on the Sabra. You can see the similarity.

  • @karlp8484
    @karlp8484 8 лет назад +5

    Great video of a great tank. Couple of minor things: My understanding is that the normal ammuntion load is stored in the tank bussel at the back of the turret (a la M1) well armoured and sealed away from the crew compartment, EXTRA ammunition can replace the troops in the rear, if nescessary. The Israelis were major users of the Centurion tank, in fact it was their most important tank in 1967 (Yom Kippur war).
    Anywho..No, always loved the idea of taking dismounts, so many advantages. APCs/ MICVs can often get seperated from tanks in an attack defeating the combined assault. The dismounts can directly defend the tank, while the tank defends them. Perfect combo.
    The compartment at the rear is multi-purpose as well, as you pointed out. Even can be used as a command centre. I think the emphasis on armour is right, high speed in that terrain and you're just going to throw a track anyway.

    • @leronbenari226
      @leronbenari226 8 лет назад

      Karl P Yeah 12 Israeli tanks held the entire north from being taken by a Syrian brigade for 3 days before being reinforced.

    • @Mastercard187
      @Mastercard187 8 лет назад +1

      It's not 1967 no more dude..... check south Lebanon 2006 you'll see what I mean loll

    • @Sam_Guevenne
      @Sam_Guevenne 8 лет назад

      have you served in the armed forces of your country?

    • @Meirstein
      @Meirstein 8 лет назад

      1967 was the 6 Day War. The Yom Kippur war was 1973.

  • @Yeeren
    @Yeeren 7 лет назад +7

    2:52 - Israel also has had an informal "understanding" with Jordan since 1967, followed by an official peace agreement in 1994.

  • @vernski1015
    @vernski1015 7 лет назад +1

    Nice job! I have been fascinated with this vehicle since I first learned of its existence. Currently building a 1/35 scale Merkava IIID and I very much appreciated the video. Cheers!

  • @shanechapman3567
    @shanechapman3567 9 месяцев назад +1

    Merkava is one of my favorite main battle tanks

  • @beepIL
    @beepIL 8 лет назад +6

    Love these tank reviews :) subscribed

  • @sukhoisu-24fencer3
    @sukhoisu-24fencer3 6 лет назад +5

    I always loved the merkava. Its intimidating and cool at the same time.

  • @maxdim3704
    @maxdim3704 7 лет назад +17

    This is a tank,love merkava,love Israel army products like the new galil 7,62

  • @danielgreenberg1915
    @danielgreenberg1915 8 лет назад +2

    Discovered this video by accident, but really enjoyed it. Even learned some new things despite having worked alongside these beasts for three years (I was in infantry, God forbid I lock myself in a tin can with wheels).
    Looking forwards you your video on the Trophy System. In the field we called it "Me'el Ruach (Rain Coat)"

  • @GoViking933
    @GoViking933 Год назад

    By far The best review I’ve seen on the Merkava so far.

  • @רומןמיצק
    @רומןמיצק 7 лет назад +190

    Merkava mk 4 driverr here

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  7 лет назад +50

      רומן מיצק thank you for your service

    • @tarnapolsky4593
      @tarnapolsky4593 7 лет назад +12

      anshul bhardwaj israel doesnt have many swamps lol

    • @Trust_The_Plan
      @Trust_The_Plan 6 лет назад +3

      רומן מיצק Did you fight in the 2006 war in Lebanon?

    • @JovanSRBIJAAA
      @JovanSRBIJAAA 6 лет назад +23

      Russian ATGM engenier here, can we talk a little bit about your armor ? xD

    • @noname123412
      @noname123412 6 лет назад +2

      we dont have swamps in israel :)

  • @rosscollingwood5189
    @rosscollingwood5189 6 лет назад +6

    Imagine that - actually listening to the experienced troops on the front line and not the bubble-headed politicians safe in their ivory towers! What a novel concept!!!

  • @olddylan6633
    @olddylan6633 8 лет назад +60

    Anyone noticed at 7:52 the antenna fell off? XD

    • @command_unit7792
      @command_unit7792 7 лет назад +6

      Dylan Cao Its not an antena is an indicator to help the crew orient the turret better...

    • @genericman448
      @genericman448 7 лет назад +9

      Not to orient the turret, its to know more precisely the tank dimensiones and where each corner ends.

    • @prostata200
      @prostata200 6 лет назад +1

      yes, but in merkava 4 it is a different structure

  • @jamesvaughan9471
    @jamesvaughan9471 6 лет назад

    Another outstanding vid by Matsimus! Hey man I really appreciate the work you put into these. I've watched many and haven't found one yet that I didn't like! Keep them coming!

  • @nickmujiri1720
    @nickmujiri1720 8 лет назад +2

    How do you not have that many subscribers? Your videos are amazing! I'll do what I can to represent your channel more!

  • @doctim111
    @doctim111 6 лет назад +6

    Front-wheel driven, better than rear mounted drive sprockets, mud on tracks drops off before hitting the drive sprocket lessening the chance of throwing a track

  • @sergarlantyrell7847
    @sergarlantyrell7847 7 лет назад +5

    Are you kidding, the troop transport functionality is my favourite feature!

  • @lordofdarkdudes
    @lordofdarkdudes 7 лет назад +41

    No dont write that comment. We are here to talk about tanks and nothing ells.
    Comments about tanks are awsome
    Throwing out youre opion about a certian political subject is not welcom here go to a diffrent comment section for that

    • @reuvenpolonskiy2544
      @reuvenpolonskiy2544 6 лет назад +4

      True that

    • @appleislander8536
      @appleislander8536 6 лет назад +15

      For a video that actually mentions Israel, it's actually pretty tame around here.

    • @appleislander8536
      @appleislander8536 6 лет назад +7

      @@foxtrot1-5 or Neo-Fascists and Assad apologists. We are very lucky.
      PS Merry Xmas

    • @guestimator121
      @guestimator121 6 лет назад

      @@appleislander8536 Nor neocons and warmongering warhawks.

  • @turtlewolfpack6061
    @turtlewolfpack6061 6 лет назад +2

    One of my favorite MBTs, amazing concept.

  • @dustii_patron8031
    @dustii_patron8031 5 лет назад

    Dude you make such satisfying and quality videos!! Keep it up.. I'm very happy I found your channel.

  • @largol33t1
    @largol33t1 7 лет назад +24

    Matsimus, major props for mentioning the French and British governments refusing to help Israeli troops with getting decent armor. Many fake historians in my country say Israel "refused their offer of tanks for importation," which is a blatant lie. The Merkava partly exists because the Israelis couldn't find anyone to help provide them with tanks. Even in the US, the ones who push their politics into teaching history remain more and more anti-Israeli to the point that there are more PLO sympathizers than ever before. These same haters also still continue to blame Israel for the attack on the World Trade Center! The terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, not Israel.

    • @johnpatz8395
      @johnpatz8395 6 лет назад +4

      largol33t1 don't blame all of the US for the leftist extremists who hate Isreal, if it makes you feel any better I can let you in on the worst kept secret ever, they also hate the USA, the country they live in, so you're in good company.

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 6 лет назад +2

      There are three countries I would shed blood for. America, I live here. S. Korea born there. Israel because never again. My father was among those that liberated Buchenwald.

    • @goddepersonno3782
      @goddepersonno3782 6 лет назад

      Well, at least you don't live somewhere that doesn't exist (australia).

    • @jaromeunrooski6963
      @jaromeunrooski6963 6 лет назад +1

      9/11 has Mossad fingerprints all over it. It was probably a Saudi-Mossad-CIA joint effort. You ever look into the 9/11 dancing Israelis? Google it. I dare you!

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 6 лет назад

      Of course you saw it on the web. Has to be true.

  • @tasman006
    @tasman006 8 лет назад +6

    Isreal already had the Centurion tank and used it to good affect in the 6 day war, Yom Kippour war and the 1982 invasion of Lebenon. It was the Chieftian tank which there General Tal oversaw was going to be supplied to Isreal by England. Due to political pressure from the Arab world which if the Chieftain was supplied would have put trade sanctions into affect. So with Tals knowledge of the Chieftain and they already had the Centurion mixed them together, and then they made the Merkava tank.

  • @LockLT
    @LockLT 8 лет назад +144

    Sexiest tank in the world! :)

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +29

      Julius Kačenauskas it looks pretty amazing! I look at it like a Porsche compared to a heavy duty truck of a Abrams lol thanks for watching!!

    • @kabdul9208
      @kabdul9208 7 лет назад +3

      T-14 is the Sexiest tank in the world

    • @kabdul9208
      @kabdul9208 7 лет назад +1

      Merkava fucked Russian Anti Tank missile in 2006 by Hezbollah

    • @ihateeverything3972
      @ihateeverything3972 7 лет назад

      No

    • @philipplutki
      @philipplutki 6 лет назад +1

      am i the only one who finds the abrams extremely well designed and sexy?

  • @blingbling574
    @blingbling574 8 лет назад

    I modelled a 3D MkIII back in 2006 in AutoCAD. You learn a lot about tank design doing it in 3D. Took well over a hundred hours. Getting specs, like dimensions and weights on components online was trickier back then. From what I learned, I could confidently put together a 60% complete prototype of my own creation.

  • @billdanosky
    @billdanosky 6 лет назад +2

    Great video! I really appreciated the graphic assembly of the tank's components, and the differences between the models. Extra props to the author, who seems knowledgeable (being a tank mechanic) but not parsimonious. It's hard to believe this- I'm actually going to check out that French tank!

  • @WAJK2030
    @WAJK2030 8 лет назад +10

    It probably makes no sense to you, since you might not be familiar with the battle of combined arms in urban environments. Since the best protection of a armoured vehicle in urban streets is a side and rear guad of infantry, clearing from house to house - the tanks realy becomes a IFV. Thats also why it inherets a build in mortar system (shooting OVER houses).

    • @orikojokro6677
      @orikojokro6677 8 лет назад +1

      Johann Koenitz
      Good luck shooting a mortar in an urban area. (With many citizens)

    • @WAJK2030
      @WAJK2030 8 лет назад +3

      ori kojokro Tell this to the IDF.

  • @AlexHahnvideos
    @AlexHahnvideos 8 лет назад +4

    Love the flying saucer like turret.

    • @elusive6119
      @elusive6119 8 лет назад +1

      armedman.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/obekt-279-11.jpg
      upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/Object_279_%28tank%29.JPG
      ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Объект_279

    • @Mortjep9531
      @Mortjep9531 8 лет назад +4

      dafuq

  • @ALegitimateYoutuber
    @ALegitimateYoutuber 8 лет назад +9

    How you said missiles are becoming less of a threat due to modern systems. Makes me wonder when we'll be actively looking into kinetic anti-tank again. Mainly kinetic missiles since last time those were explored, the us military found out they just destroyed any current and foreseeable armor system. Problem was they need some range to gain speed and they had pretty much no splash effect, also chemical warheads at the time were still completely effective. But I could see the idea being revisited soon, since a weakness to active defense systems are kinetic rounds. So imagine something as fast as a sabot round, but weighs anywhere from 5 to 10 times more. Thats not something you stop or deflect, instead you just hope it breaks only the vehicle or you get lucky and it misses.

    • @elusive6119
      @elusive6119 8 лет назад +1

      Active-reactive shell adjustable in flight? perhaps in the future

    • @rahbaralhaq
      @rahbaralhaq 8 лет назад +5

      Or we will probably just go for more raw firepower. Railguns and Lasers are now feasible naval armament, won't take long for them to become an option for Tanks as well.

    • @ALegitimateYoutuber
      @ALegitimateYoutuber 8 лет назад +3

      Rik Raptor
      Wont happen on tanks, they require power packages that a tank simply can't do. Also lasers for military weapons have already pretty much been shot down, because they don't provide anything worth having that a missile or a kinetic gun doesn't have. The exception with a laser is they reach the target almost instantly. But downside is they require a huge amount of power and need a pretty clean line of sight, not to mention they often have to stay on target for a bit.
      Railguns you wont see on armor, because you must understand those things require a lot of power. Now the low velocity coilguns, for mortar vehicles you might. Since coilguns are much easier to work with and last much longer, and we have already created a few mortars that use such tech. But as for now they provide nothing of benefit, because they are heavier, bigger, more expensive, plus a few other downsides.

    • @elusive6119
      @elusive6119 8 лет назад +2

      ***** Possible really. Armata suggests the transition to a hybrid engine. That will give enough energy for electronics, active armor, sensor systems(afar) and the pulse gun. But, the need for new materials and years of research.

    • @elusive6119
      @elusive6119 8 лет назад +1

      ***** What is implemented now is a compromise between price and capabilities of the industry.

  • @bigman-adv
    @bigman-adv 4 года назад +1

    I was a Merkava 2B Tank Commander and lived in it.
    Sorry, but you totally don't get the value of the rear corridor.
    It's an exit door if the tank is hit, a place to sleep, carry 2 people without giving up anything, carry extra ammo or any other gear, easy and quick way to resupplly ammo.

  • @tyberfen5009
    @tyberfen5009 6 лет назад +1

    I like the design of the turret. And it's capability to carry troops make this already impressively protected vehicle even more flexible considering the small size of the Israelian population (around 10m I think it was). With so few human capital, it's only rational to give armour protection such a huge importance. Especially in a state which is in constant war with it's neighbor.

  • @idoperlmutter6660
    @idoperlmutter6660 7 лет назад +36

    Israel is not in a state of war with jordan

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 7 лет назад +15

      Their goverment know that working with israel is better than going against it. Their people on the other hand are influenced by islamic brotherhood.

    • @patriotenfield3276
      @patriotenfield3276 4 года назад

      neither egypt nor jordan are in a favor of war with Israel. even saudi wants a secret cooperation with 'em just to piss of the iranians

  • @TihoDownTheTube
    @TihoDownTheTube 6 лет назад +4

    The most beautiful tank in the world. T-90 is second.

  • @wolfvomrhein1503
    @wolfvomrhein1503 7 лет назад +8

    "I hate that tank!" - a CSAT soldier

  • @Pegasoose
    @Pegasoose 5 лет назад +2

    This video is about to blow up with the addition of the merkava into war thunder

  • @guyfriedman295
    @guyfriedman295 6 лет назад

    I'm not sure if you mentioned it,and if so I would mention it again: the Merkava is based around the crew,anywhere from the front placed modules to the rear hatch (instead of going in and out from the turret/drivers hatch) are meant to keep the crew safe and easily evacuated in case of an emergency.

  • @hofnaerrchen
    @hofnaerrchen 8 лет назад +3

    I really like the looks of this tank and I think there approach has many different factors. One might be what Israel is facing as potential enemies. While the arab countries surrounding them field tanks, most of them are at least a generation older but the real "threat" comes from asynchronious forces which employ infantry and improvised vehicles and explosive devices, fighting mostly in urban areas as it could be seen lately when Iraqi troops went to Mosul taking it back from the IS. While not as effective as a specialized vehicle in narrow streets one extremely good protected tank might be the best sollution. Apart from that they use the same hull for their heavy armored APCs. And for coming to an end, I think Israels size as a nation has to be taken into account, too. While being limited in resources, it's manpower - especially good trained manpower - is the biggest asset.

    • @AN-it8dp
      @AN-it8dp 5 лет назад

      lol the lebanese decimated the merkava in 2006 war. Absolutely destroyed it's reputation

  • @arielzuk3226
    @arielzuk3226 8 лет назад +4

    I see you're bothered with the troop carrying capability. The answer is very simple: It didn't affect the design process at all.
    Many people do think it's somewhat of an APC, or think of it as one of its main features, but all the designers ever did (it was at the end of the development process actually) was install the ammo racks in a way that allowed the crew to easily remove them in a matter of minutes, and allow a few soldiers to sit inside.
    It was VERY uncomfortable for anyone sitting there. You have to squat, ruin your back, and occasionally be stabbed by the spikes on the walls that hold the ammo racks.
    One person just suggested it during the development after 1973 since the M113 were proven to be highly vulnerable to anything that breathes on them.
    The movement of the engine to the front allowed freeing up a whole lot of space even without sacrificing any frontal armor, and for a fact, the Merkava is perhaps the roomiest, most comfortable tank to be in. Of course, relatively. Tanks are never comfortable, nor roomy.
    Bottom line: it was more of a side effect stemming from the design direction at hand. In practice, it isn't used anymore.
    Improving the protection will be hard. The Merkava 4 already does feature perhaps the thickest top, side, and rear armor to date, utilizing a light NERA composite armor. And only second to the T-14 in terms of frontal armor thickness (750mm), and its systems such as FCS, APU and more, are modular so their upgrading is easy. Therefore while almost every major player in the tank field tries to develop the next generation, Israel doesn't forsee a Merkava 5 anytime in the near future.

  • @gusgone4527
    @gusgone4527 7 лет назад +14

    After a lifetime in the British army in one role or another. My only regret is that I never took time out to join and serve with the Israeli Defence Force. I'm not Jewish or religious in any shape or form. However, I do support Parliamentary Democracies with Universal Suffrage. Israel is the only one in that region and constantly under attack. Their cause is mine too!

    • @willb8684
      @willb8684 7 лет назад +1

      oh fuck lol....thats just stupid....neither side is worth 2 shekles i hope they kill each other off...

    • @paulie-g
      @paulie-g 4 года назад

      So the Palestinians get to vote in Israeli elections, do they?

  • @rantal6884
    @rantal6884 4 года назад +1

    A few points: Great Britain was the main cause for the development of the Merkava. Israel has collaborated with the UK on the development of the Chieftan, and started working on the Merkava after the UK cancelled the deal with Israel to buy the (Israeli - improved ) chieftan .

    • @rantal6884
      @rantal6884 4 года назад

      Second point: always evaluate the tank in its battle environment. The Golan is ~50 km x 20 km. It’s not intended to go from the Saudi desert to Baghdad

    • @rantal6884
      @rantal6884 4 года назад +1

      Third point: in the Yom Kipur war Israeli tanks evacuated soldiers from the front on top of the tanks, which prevented tanks of fighting and made the people on the tanks vulnerable. Being able to carry them internally makes sense

    • @rantal6884
      @rantal6884 4 года назад +1

      Fourth point: in 73 many Israeli tanks were hit by ATGMs . Artillery was effective against ATGM units but was not available. Having your own artillery on tanks makes sense

    • @rantal6884
      @rantal6884 4 года назад +1

      Fifth point: in 73 the ratio of Syrian to Israeli tanks in the Golan was 7:1. The Israelis seen the Syrians coming, but they were out of their range. Having the ability to start knocking out the enemy at a longer range with barrel - launched ATGMs makes sense.

  • @impguardwarhamer
    @impguardwarhamer 5 лет назад +1

    I've heard that having the engine at the front makes the merkava significantly brighter on thermals, which makes it much easier to spot from an enemy tank or other thermal-equipped threats

    • @merkavamkivm5156
      @merkavamkivm5156 4 года назад +1

      I don't mind getting spotted, because I can't get hit (trofiy hard kill APS, you're welcome) ;)

  • @vascoespañol
    @vascoespañol 6 лет назад +3

    15.00 Latrum museum, i have been on top of that Merkava IV

    • @EJ257IHI
      @EJ257IHI 4 года назад

      Diego Apalategui Me too!

  • @John5209
    @John5209 6 лет назад +7

    Combat proven. The ultimate test!!

  • @jamesdavies6755
    @jamesdavies6755 8 лет назад +3

    Awesome tank!!!

  • @darklighter8968
    @darklighter8968 8 лет назад +1

    I beleive this is the best tank nowadays, simply because of the engine up front configuration, it is designed to save the crew above anything else, respect that.

  • @nirharpaz1
    @nirharpaz1 7 лет назад +1

    Just something to spark the imagination:
    Introducing the MK4, the Vanilla tank cost was something around 1.5m$
    Today, its something around 6m$
    aside from arment and such, just think of the amount of tech installed inside that thing that no-one can know for sure.

  • @moobsmcgee3554
    @moobsmcgee3554 8 лет назад +25

    How come modern tanks have a bulge in the middle of the barrel?

    • @eeeboytvr
      @eeeboytvr 8 лет назад +1

      I believe thats a weight to counter balance the barrel with the breech.

    • @עמיחיגרוס-ה8ה
      @עמיחיגרוס-ה8ה 8 лет назад +42

      The buldge hosts a gas deflecter

    • @karlp8484
      @karlp8484 8 лет назад +67

      It's a fume extractor. An annular piston device pulls the gun smoke forward out of the barrel when the gun returns after the recoil.

    • @Riceball01
      @Riceball01 8 лет назад +8

      What he said. It's there so that the fumes from the firing of the shell don't go back into the tank once the breach is opened again to eject the spent shell casing and/or to insert a new round.

    • @eeeboytvr
      @eeeboytvr 8 лет назад +1

      Ah yes you can see it at 0:35. I belive it was a counter balance on many earlier British tanks though.

  • @TaintMeat68
    @TaintMeat68 8 лет назад +17

    I hope the U.S keeps helping Israel . I think they are more than worthy to get what ever help they may need . Not saying they are weak . The Israeli Defense Forces are by no means weak and can definitely stomp a mud hole in anyone dumb enough to pick a fight with them .

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +9

      Agreed :-) They should be supported. Thanks for watching!

    • @michaelalexander3078
      @michaelalexander3078 8 лет назад +4

      Matsimus Gaming So your imperialist country gave my country to the Zionists and you want to keep supporting them? Go f*ck yourself you ignorant douche!

    • @michaelalexander3078
      @michaelalexander3078 7 лет назад +1

      300maze Keep telling yourself that. Palestine lives in the heart of every Palestinian everywhere and always will. David Ben Gurion once said about Palestinians that the old will die and the young will forget - that was in 1947. We'll, the old haven't all died yet and the young have certainly not forgotten.
      Fighting for freedom and independence is never terrorism. Illegal occupation on the other hand is terrorism.

    • @300maze
      @300maze 7 лет назад +3

      ok
      lets assume that palestine will exist on the 1967 borders
      the palestine country will need israeli resources to survive
      electricity - all your electricity is coming from israel
      water - from israel
      food - from israel
      good hospitals - only in israel
      you know that when palestinian country will exist
      israel wont give anything to the palestinians
      you will starve to death and wont get any electricity
      like north korea

    • @300maze
      @300maze 7 лет назад +1

      and palestinians arent fightining agaisnt the israeli army
      you murdering civilians
      shooting rockets on civilians
      israel only fight hamas that hiding behind civilians like whores
      you know that the idf is the strongest army in the middle east and you cant win a war against it
      more than 900,000 ready to fight soldiers
      thoudnads of armored vehicles
      biggest and strongest air force in the middle east
      hundreds of nuclear weapons

  • @connorsbuilds
    @connorsbuilds 8 лет назад +4

    xD
    At 7:54 the Merkava knocks off one of it's antenna - guess they forgot to secure it properly :D

    • @connorsbuilds
      @connorsbuilds 8 лет назад

      Slow down the video - between 7:52 and 7:54 one can clearly see the antenna falling off.
      When that same spot is compared after a full traverse, one can see that it's still missing, whereas the other antenna's just flailed about.

    • @connorsbuilds
      @connorsbuilds 8 лет назад +1

      At 7:55 you can actually see it lying on the ground in the bottom right-hand corner of the screen :)

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  8 лет назад +3

      Haha I didnt notice that lol! Thats funny. Thanks for watching! :-)

    • @IDFArmor
      @IDFArmor 8 лет назад +4

      they are just a visual refference of the tank's physical border for the commander or driver, just pieces of hard rubber.

    • @Agm1995gamer
      @Agm1995gamer 7 лет назад +5

      It's not an antenna though. Antennas are all on the turret.

  • @BannerJames
    @BannerJames 5 лет назад

    Your channel is a Gold Mine! Thank you for the vids and info.

  • @Sundara229
    @Sundara229 7 лет назад +1

    Impressive Stuff for a nation of only 8-9 million people.
    Keep it up! Dont let others take away your country. Greetings from Germany and Poland.

  • @proto-nm9hr
    @proto-nm9hr 8 лет назад +8

    im a merkava mk4 driver its all fun and games until u have to work maitance on this huge hunk of metal

    • @vladmoo8253
      @vladmoo8253 8 лет назад

      רומן מיצק that tank is shit

    • @proto-nm9hr
      @proto-nm9hr 8 лет назад +3

      shit is what ur mother brought to the world when she gave birth to u

    • @vladmoo8253
      @vladmoo8253 8 лет назад

      רומן מיצק wow the jewish ass zoinest is so butthurt now we are talking about shitty israeli tanks not mothers. even the t 90 is better then merkava.

  • @SabreWolferos
    @SabreWolferos 8 лет назад +5

    7:52 lol they just broke their antennae

    • @IDFArmor
      @IDFArmor 8 лет назад +2

      those border defining thingies break all the time...

  • @Raio_Verusia
    @Raio_Verusia 7 лет назад +9

    "Matsimus Gaming" do you actually game? lol

    • @_Matsimus_
      @_Matsimus_  7 лет назад +5

      Raio Verusia check out my channel and find out for yourself :-)

  • @mihaeltomasovic
    @mihaeltomasovic 6 лет назад +1

    the Centurion was by _far_ the *BEST* tank of the early Cold War and even up until the October War (Yom Kippur Conflict) in which the HESH rounds proved to still be fabulous! What a great creation! I mean... the Centurion didn't have to worry about the short range in Israel in such a small nation and could make full use of its fabulous L7 105mm models of gun with the ability of depressing that gun so far it makes it just _so_ far beyond what the T-54/55 and T-62s could do! Look at the engagement at the Valley of Tears and you'll see just how _amazingly_ advanced the Centurions were in comparisons to the T-55s and T-62s driven by the Syrians (as well as the Egyptians on the southern front). of course, the M48s and M60 Pattons were also used along with some up-gunned Shermans with I think 20 pounders on them... Maybe 17 pounders, but they look bigger than that and given they could knock out T-55s so easily I think they were probably upgunned from the "Firefly" or E6/E8 standard setup.

  • @abryg8655
    @abryg8655 3 года назад

    As an infantry soldier walking aside tanks in battle i could appreciate the compartment at the rear. There is a place there for 6-9 soldiers (depending on the shells stored) which could be brought safely to the line of clash, or used as shelter and evacuation.
    A lot of soldier's experience has been planted in this machine.

  • @Umu_Eri
    @Umu_Eri 5 лет назад +3

    Hey any warthunder lads here

    • @tzarzinjo3766
      @tzarzinjo3766 5 лет назад

      I just started my 2nd I-180s this morning. :D

    • @funundercarkids
      @funundercarkids 5 лет назад

      No and yes

    • @redworker11
      @redworker11 5 лет назад

      Finished 2nd on to 3rd... merkava in 2 days hype

  • @israelnowandforever449
    @israelnowandforever449 6 лет назад +4

    ISRAEL NOW AND FOREVER ❤

    • @FriendlyHouseCentipede
      @FriendlyHouseCentipede 6 лет назад +1

      HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS NOW AND FOREVER ❤

    • @appleislander8536
      @appleislander8536 6 лет назад

      That's how to get hate comments!
      Though legitimately, Israel and Palestine should both have the right to exist.

  • @dicecorporation
    @dicecorporation 8 лет назад +22

    Asbestos clothing? Say hi to the cancer doctors for me

    • @kris220b
      @kris220b 8 лет назад +34

      as long as its sealed withing something else
      and does not flake off, its completely fine

    • @hutrputr
      @hutrputr 8 лет назад +1

      dicecop i am.sure that soviet tanks have it to. its part of protection. when tank is in battle,where nuclear blast is.in use. if you want try google tank nbc protection. i remeber see t72,which has turett in some kind of textile cover,which is Nbc protection. theese words:" t 72 soviet progeny" type in google. first link.soviet armor blogspot

    • @kris220b
      @kris220b 8 лет назад +3

      PSG1JOHN1
      if you mean the insulation asbestos used in concrete walls
      that only became a problem when people tried to remove it
      normally it would just be locked into the concrete

    • @dicecorporation
      @dicecorporation 8 лет назад +2

      kris220b
      No, here in Denmark all schools from the 60's and 70's had it in the roof/ceiling. We had many cases with lung cancer, especially those who worked with it. They never wore protection since they didn't know it was dangerous even though the companies knew it since the 1920's. That's why there was that big purge on companies back in the 1990's

    • @kris220b
      @kris220b 8 лет назад

      dicecop nå så ved mand det
      ved nok mere om resten af kloden end denmark

  • @superwout
    @superwout 8 лет назад

    the internal layout with the "troopcompartment" at the back is sheer genius; it's not merely a troopcompartment, but offers possibility of extracting a crew of a damaged vehicle, carry extra supplies, offer greater comfort for the crew- increasing their time and effectiveness out on the job and it's a safe exit from the vehicle especially in case of emergency- much better than out on top or underneath the tank

  • @duke0salt717
    @duke0salt717 2 года назад +1

    Merkava is one of my favorite modern tank designs,esthetically I'm mostly talking I personally don't know a lot about Merkava but I love it's angles

  • @svenkikals-hallstrom6200
    @svenkikals-hallstrom6200 7 лет назад +4

    Hezbollah easily destroyed Israel's pride, the multi million dollar Merkava tank with $27.000 missiles in Lebanon in 2006. What a humiliation!

  • @eastsouth9548
    @eastsouth9548 8 лет назад +5

    there is no way in hell this thing is heavily armored. they have had to cut corners somewhere.
    there is no way in hell you can fit 10 people in a tank and say it has thesame level of protection as a western tank with only 4 people.
    in the armor equation there is a set level of armor need to protect an individual tank crew and that adds weight.
    the whole point of autoloaders is to reduce the crew therefore reducing the weight significantly.
    how the fukk is adding 6 more people into the tank not incurring any penalties.
    the merkava weighs as much as an abrams goes just as fast or even faster and holds 10 crew. and thats not +6 babies thats +6 fully grown adult men wearing full combat gear with weapons.
    and jesus h christ how the fukk did they manage to put in a mortar inside the tank.
    there is no freaking way this tank did not cut corners when designing the amor.

    • @leronbenari226
      @leronbenari226 8 лет назад

      East South They remove 90% of the ammo.

    • @denniszaidman2089
      @denniszaidman2089 8 лет назад +6

      You can't really carry full gear, just lightly armed infantry at the expense of ammunition/supplies.

    • @franciscomoutinho1
      @franciscomoutinho1 8 лет назад +1

      That's what always bothered me, the thing about modern tanks is that composite armour or spaced armour take up a significant amount of space. Yet they seem to have so much amount of space.Seeing how many were lost in the Lebanon war I'd say they might be more vulnerable to shaped charges. As for the other defence characteristics mention, many other tanks already use it.
      Israel is a small country, they might be experienced militarily and the base design is good, but in the end there are only so much resources and tecnology they can devote to such a large project

    • @Sam_Guevenne
      @Sam_Guevenne 8 лет назад +3

      4 mk4's were lost in lebanon that was before the mk4m which increased the armor under the tank and extended the shield

    • @cahsahhhhhhhn
      @cahsahhhhhhhn 8 лет назад +2

      it can only fit 6 more troops AFTER all the ammo is removed. I'm sure you could squeeze a few more men into the Abrams as well if you put them where the ammo goes.

  • @donovannotmyname7306
    @donovannotmyname7306 7 лет назад +3

    The Six day war still makes me laugh.

  • @seumasnatuaighe
    @seumasnatuaighe 6 лет назад +1

    The IDF fielded the Centurion for a good number of years and incorporated some of its features into the Merkava. The Mk1 and Mk2 had the British L7 105mm rifled gun, (as did the original M1 Abrams.) You can see all British and US armor from the Bren Carrier to the M60 at the IDF Armor Brigade Museum just outside Jerusalem. Really a good day out.

  • @jumi9342
    @jumi9342 5 лет назад +1

    The door in the back is more for a fast reload of the ammo because they saw that their gunners have a high accuracy but burn through the ammo fast. The transport thing was a nice side effect but it's not the main reason for the door.