I love the 40mm focal length. It’s usually (not always, of course) easy to move back or forth a bit to get the framing I prefer, and gives a nice 3D look with a bit of background blur. And it’s sharp. Love, love love it.
The title of this video says the Ricoh GR3x is the ultimate Street and travel Camera. I own the Ricoh GR3 and had been under the mistaken impression that the GR3 is the ultimate street and travel camera. I stand corrected! 😉
Last night I had a good think about the GR3x and decided I could afford it without too much trouble so................ I made a plan to go out, drive to my usual shop about 25 miles away and get one. Then I woke up in reality..... and remembered the lack of optical viewfinder, fixed focal length lens, no flip out LCD (I take pictures of mushrooms, among other things, and it's difficult to get a good shot without one), and, from what I've heard on other RUclips videos, you just about need three spare batteries for a day trip. I've decide to wait and see - or maybe have a visit to the shop and see what else I could use, though the APS-C format, rather than the Micro4/3rds might not be easy to find.
I just got off the phone (... sorta speak!) With a techy from Ricoh. Although my issue was unrelated to the issue at hand here, I learnt a rather valuable bit of information from him.... The person suggested that although the idea of using a external adapter of any kind over the lens body of the camera - most likely that of the 75mm lens could possibly cause heat buildup of the sensor thus possibly rendering the warranty of the camera invalid. Secondly; from years of watching RUclips channels (, like yours...) I've come to realize that when people don't like a product that someone is talking (reviewing in good faith) about, they sometimes discredit the item being discussed. Even so much as if they simply dislike the name of the product. I never go by a single 'poll' rather it be a positive or negative response. Your response to the 'bad' is a definite response.
That is interesting. I guess that depends a bit on many things. The heat build up, that is. I find it hard to believe, but I guess it can be possible in some scenario. I have to find out a bit more about that. Besides, over here the manufacturer would be liable for their products in any case, if the product is relatively new and used normally, like with their own tele converter or other accessory. Thanks for sharing anyway.
@@mattisulanto I suppose I should have mentioned the product I'm referring to is an after market brand. And not a Ricoh product. I think perhaps maybe it's Ricoh's way to discourage people from buying another brand name that's perfectly suitable for the same purpose. (As per my previous message.... My thoughts anyways!
Good to hear the x is as nice as the iii. If I had the funds I would also be tempted by it. I love the iii for many of the reasons you have said. I like doing double exposures and have bought a cheap finder that actually magnetically attaches to the LCD for those bright days when I really want to be able to check detail but the light is bouncing around. Also bought the Nisi filter kit, which is clever but as of yet I have not had much use for. But the great thing as you say is you can take this camera almost anywhere and pop it in a coat pocket or have it on a small belt pouch. I do however have a spare battery as multi exposure has to be done sequentially without turning the camera off. Great review Matty.
@@mattisulanto make sure you get the one that fixes to the camera, not the lens, otherwise when you turn off the camera in an absent moment your filters go smash Mattias Burling had a painful experience that way!
The Nisi filter kit is so awesome.... I love mine. Take the time (I know, not always easy) to try it with any long exposure subject (water...) It's quite worth it and fun...
@@mattisulanto Oh, yeah, and it's a pretty awesome kit, totally worth it...Best of both world, my Nisi kit for the GR II (not III or x) is also working perfectly with my Fuji X70 (GR II competition, with nicer colors out of the box to my taste, but both have pros and cons (vs the GR II)).
Thanks for the review. Very impressive camera and pictures. I would love to take pictures like these - but unfortunately I live in the tropics, so its a no go!
As always, the photography lover comes through in your presentation. Your influences are found in my "pocket rocket" Lumix GX850/800 with either the 14-42mm power zoom, 14mm prime or Laowa 7.5mm attached. Fits in my pocket and works like a Swiss Army knife!😊 While the Ricoh appears to have killer image quality, the flexibility of a small m4/3 may be a better choice for most. It's sad that Panasonic no longer makes the GF9/GX850, but Olympus still has the PL10. Perhaps you could take a look at the PL10 compared with the Ricoh. Keep on sharing your love of photography!
Lumix GX9 with 14mm Lumix lens will be the same kit you like. I own the GX-85 which is a nice little camera. In the USA they are now selling the GX-9 with 12-60mm lens for $799 US dollar. For the street, the Fujifilm X-E4 looks like one to consider, if wanting an APS-C camera, yet small, with changeable lenses.
Neither the E-PL9 nor E-PL10 take the VF4 EVF. Surely this was a backwards step? The E-PL8 was only ever a cosmetic update to the E-PL7, which is similar tiny size to the GR3. The PEN-F does have better IQ but is significantly bigger, are are the GX. The E-PL7/8 shares platform with the E-M10ii, the PEN-F with the E-M5ii. I like the tilt screen on the little camera but maybe not the big guns. I have recently discovered my "problems" with poor photo IQ was not the camera but low resolution monitor - sorted with a UHD. (short version, my best monitor had failed and I was making-do with the FHD) Now back to two screens.
I brought mine a couple of years ago during the lockdown, but use a different lens setup 12-32, 20 and 42.5 to keep a small fit. The Laowa is on my wishlist. The 14mm I was put off with being a prime f2.5 but have seen some praise for it. Ideally, I'd like them to bring out a gm5 mark ii but alas I feel Panasonic will never go back to small and compact, I feel they are missing a trick, considering the second-hand market you can see there is definitely now a demand.
@@JamesWilliams-rw6qc I had a GM1 and one option with that was the little 12-32. I tried it with that and with the PZ14-42 I already had, and fancied the PZ the better due to the way it pops up automatically, and is a bit longer. I found the GM1 too small and fiddly and soon parted company. The fast 20 is a must-have. The Oly 45 is nice, and small. I had, long gone, an E-PL1 with the 14-42EZ. A rather nasty lens. The glass was alright but the way it operated was like a coffee grinder. Yes I think Lumix should produce a MFT pocket camera like the PEN-Lite; The E-PL10 does nothing much better than the E-PL7 except video, and it has lost the shoe for the VF4 EVF. There again they have the LX series. The 2015 GF7 was essentially a GM1 in a bigger body. The 2018 GF10 body is reminiscent of the E-PL1. But none have IBIS, which us useful for small no-OIS primes. A tilt screen is useful for unobtrusive waist level shots.
I've always wanted one of those GR cameras but I have an E-M5 with 20mm f/1.7 Lumix that is small and fun enough. Nice photos, I especially like those on the bus.
that 20mm is a great lens, and it was initially hard for me to want to give it up and switch out of MFT. But I can say that the IQ from the iiix is at least as good, if not a little bit BETTER, than that Pana 20mm. And the extra resolution of the 24mpx APS-C sensor means I have some more freedom to crop in when I want to. I do miss that f/1.7 max aperature, but the GRiiix is a more performant combo when it comes to focusing. BTW, I owned a GM5, an E-M10ii, and an E-M1ii with all the f/1.7 and f/1.8 primes, the 12-40mm PRO, and several standard zooms. When I dipped my toe into the GR world, I realized it was "the way" for me, and I sold off all my other MFT lenses and bodies.
@@OneHarp what pushed you to get the grx3 and sell the mfts? I got a gm1 with the 20mm 1.7 and am thinking of getting the GR3X. Looking for a ultimate pocket camera.
@@Nick-bj5pb I bought a used GRii to see if I liked the form factor, and was immediately sold on the GR series as the ultimate pocket cam. Upgraded to the GRiii (used), and then when the iiix came out I knew I could be happy with just those two cams and sold all my MFT gear to finance it. You just can't get a smaller form factor with a sensor this size, and the IQ is absolutely stellar. I have zero regrets.
This is a good question. I also wonder how much better it is to go MFT and then to “compete” with Ricoh, just get tiny lenses. And then the advantage is when you don’t need the compactness, you could even put a giant 100-400 Leica for birding, haha.
The main difference is that the GX9 can take many lenses, but if you ignore that, then the GR wins hands down. The GR is smaller and has better image quality.
@@mattisulanto Should I ever decide to spend a lot more money on photography and get a larger primary body, I think the GR IIIx will be my way to keep the ability to stick a camera in my pocket.
@@mattisulanto Better than the Fujifilm X-E4? Where are those GRx cameras made? It is very unique. Great dynamic range is a plus. Having to use monitor can be a hassle if the sun glare becomes overwhelming. Anyway, take care, Loren
@@mattisulanto Matti, it just occurred to me that if you had the GR III Street Edition instead of the standard GR III, you could easily tell the two cameras apart 😂
Actually, the less glass the better assuming all the corrections are accomplished with existing elements. You want to minimize the number of elements in the light path where possible.
I have the GR II and III (got the III refurb from Ricoh). These are the ne plus ultra of small cameras. I hope Ricoh can continue this line and keep improving it.
Hello Matti, what is, in your opinion, the best combination of focus distance and aperture (for snap focus mode) for street photography in good lighting conditions? For the Ricoh GR IIIx
Hi Matti. Great vid on the GRx, i might make it a companion to my q2 then i think il have a great combo. I noticed you also have the FP and im curios about your thoughts on that as well. I was amazed by the compactness but i needed the evf for manual focus especialy in brighter conditions
Hi - thanks for some nice videos - I looking in to the Ricoh GR, but I not sure if I should buy the 28 or 40mm - I both like shooting landscape, buildings and people - what would you recommend - I currently have an X100T but it stays more a home because of the size....
Thanks. I'm not sure if I can decide which lens you need😀 Maybe you go through your old photos and see which was your most used lens. That's going to give you some idea of what you may need.
@@alanalain4884 The 50mm crop is only about 7.5Mp, but that is one good option for those who don't need all the pixels. You can always crop in post, of course.
Nice alternative compared to some small form factor M43 or apsc lens combos. But.. I think i'm happier with an epl10 or similar with the 25mm f1.8 or other. I get to keep the lens or carry a second. Video ain't half too bad, and it has a chunky enough battery. It also means it can be a backup cam and use the same lenses as my more expensive m43 camera. I can see the appeal though.
Hi Matti, a bad thing actually, that I remember you making an enthousiastic video about the Panasonic LX100 II after shooting it for a longer period of time (1 or 2 years ago?). So what happened to the LX100 II and wouldn't it be nice to make a comparison between the Panasonic LX100 II and the GR3x?
The LX100II is a really nice camera and I still like it, but the GR3 is better for me. I'm only speaking for myself here, my personal opinion. I don't have the LX100II any more so can't make a comparison.
Do I have to be worried about using the camera in cold weather? What is your experience with rain and cold weather? Everybody seems to think there are issues with no weather sealing, but who had real issues/camera not functioning/breaking?
I would be very interested in a test with the teleconverter. Will it degrade the image quality? Will it kill the joy to use the GR3x, because of its size and weight? How easy and fast can you add and remove the teleconverter?
@@williamdavid4823 if the image quality stays the same and easy to operate, 250 is a bargain. The alternative would be to take another camera with you with another lens, which will cost definitely more than 250.
Hi @@dirk.4711 It had better be good! .... but there is a video about it here on YT somewhere, showing the difference between the teleconverter results and cropping (not sure if it's the GR3 or GR3X) ... quite something when pixel peeping but barely noticeable when not. But I am interested: would like to learn more about the teleconverter, see more comparisons with cropped images, also the long lens compression aspect.
Strange how ‘almost the perfect camera’ is about the most niche camera also. Boats are like that too. When I shot with film I bought a Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim for $1.50 at a garage sale and I loved that camera. It was cheaply built but the images remind me of the Ricoh.
@@dagebostrom6223 I have the GRII and I do have a couple of dust spots. They are minor enough that lightroom gets rid of them. I am thinking about opening it up and cleaning it as per a video I found on RUclips. I only notice the dust on sky shots, and they come out in post easily enough. I wish it wasn't that way, though.
@@seanraz Dust on the sensor is a common problem in pocket zoom cameras. Of course, you can take them apart, but putting them back together is almost impossible.
My cameras have had no problems regarding durability so far, but I guess any gadget can break. There have some dust issues and here is my take on that: ruclips.net/video/C8LhvXMlUq4/видео.html
I have the original Ricoh GR (or GR1) when it was not too expensive. I quite like this camera but has stop using it because it has no Wifi to transfer my photo into my Tab. The Ricoh GR3 is good but is expensive and does not have a built-in flash which I find necessary for fill flash when I needed it. Having a hot shoe for an external flash is less useful because 1) Ricoh does not have a compact external flash and 2) the external flash may just be too cumbersome. Meanwhile, I would just use a Olympus TG4 (for sheer versatility) or the Canon M100 or M6 Mk2 with the 22mm f/2.0 or to use with some TTArtisan manual focus lenses.
I like this concept. I used to want to buy something similar from Nikon. I no longer remember what model it was. I know it had the same sensor as the nikon D7000.
@@mattisulanto Yes, it was... And Samsung, in its time, had an incredible APS-C 28mpx camera with just couple of lens, but it was quite something, very advanced for the time. I forgot what model though...
Would you say this will do well for concerts? I'm not that far from the stage but I do need to zoom a bit. and its a little bit dark :) Because my iphone does a bad job at it hahaha I'm looking to get my first camera, preferably compact too!
It depends on the photographer of course😀 If you are looking for a super compact camera with great image quality, then the GR3x might do the job. Another great compact is the Sony RX100IV.
@@mattisulanto Thank you!! Ill check the sony one too. I really loved the samples you showed here, hoping to achieve those kind of shots while documenting my family trips/ life stuff etc hahaha I still have so much to learn. Another question, might sound really dumb. Is the difference between a phone camera and a ricoh/sony huge? As a photography noob, some people are recommending me the S22 Ultra. But I know that a proper camera will do a better job, i just dont know how big the difference is. I've never owned one yet hahaha
@@min10596 Oh boy😀 The difference really depends on how the photo is being viewed and who took the photo. The best thing with phone cameras is that with them you can get very decent images with hardly any experience. On a phone screen all photos look really good, but on big screen you'll start to see differences.
I'd love one of those, but I suppose my GM1 does more or less the same thing for far less money. Would love to see a side by side comparison between the Ricoh(s), the Fuji XF-10 and any of the small Lumixes with 14mm or 20mm lenses.
I switched from a GM5 with all the pancakes to using both GRiii and GRiiix. The Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 is a great lens, but the 40mm equiv lens on the GRiiix is equally stunning. The Panasonic wins in terms of overall aperture flexibility (f1/7 vs f/2.8), but the GR lens focuses much faster, and, paired with the more modern 24mpx APS-C sensor vs. the 16mpx MFT sensor, the IQ is stunning. FYI, The Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 cannot compare with the IQ of the 28mm equiv lens in the regular GRiii. I shot many great images with that GM5 and the 20mm (and relatively fewer great shots with that 14mm), but the move to the GRiii and iiix was a definite improvement. The only lens I miss from my MFT days is the Olympus 45mm f/1.8.
In the analog film era, most compact Cameras had either a 35mm, 38mm or 40mm, so the "40"mm on the Ricoh GRx makes good sense. I used the Minox 35ML which are great for fast street photography, it has a 35mm Lens. Later I used the Leica Minilux which have an excellent 40mm Lens.
I use the filer adapter and a UV filer on mine. Yes, it makes the camera bigger but seems to solve the dust issue. It's still very small with the adapter on, just not jeans-pocketable.
@@andrewelliott4436 I don't know if that comment was directed at me. I'm very careful with my cameras in this regard. I've personally had no problem with my GR III; the GR II, which I've had for over five years, has one small dust spot, manageable, but nothing new since I started using the filter adapter and UV filter.
Hi Sulanto! Great review as always. I too am a fan boy of the GR III series. Particularly I like that it doesn’t have any view finder to keep the design slick. It’s not a camera for everyone as you said, but once someone falls in love with it, hard to let go. Hope Ricoh retains the exact design in future versions. Btw, do you know if the tele converter works with the 28 mm version and how much zoom it adds?
@@mattisulanto just one more thought - the 28 mm can landscape for sure. I rarely go wider than 28. I took it on a steep hike to the mountains last summer and came back with the best photo of my 2021 portfolio!
Sounds good and the GR3 has always interested me. But, and it's not a big but, I have been using the Olympus E-PL7 for virtually the same job. It is older but was state of the art when released in the back end of 2014, essentially an E-M10ii in a smaller body. Flip screen and will take the VF4 EVF. A little heavier but only a few millimetres bigger all round. Usually has the Lumix PZ14-42 glued to it, the pancake 20mm also lets it pocket.
@@jeffslade1892 I choose all of them and I think a pair of GRs is a really good solution. I really need to make a video where I compare the GRs and some small MFT camera.
Thanks for the video. Too bad it's a bit pricey. I got a used Lumix GM1 with the 1.8 pancake lense and it fits in my pocket and produces sharp image. . I like the flexibility of changing lens and I'm putting on a long telephoto lens tomorrow for a visit at the zoo.
The problem with most of the GR3 reviews, including this one is that they never mentioned all the compromises that the new model makes compared to the GR2 in order to please the "must fit in my jean's pocket" crowd . For those who do not print big , they should learn about what the Gr II offered . for my work , there is no doubt that , outside the higher MP count sensor and a few other things (like internal memory , face detection and IBIS ) the Gr2 is a MUCH MORE VERSATILE camera than the Gr3 models . Wish Ricoh would make , even as a limited edition , a GRII X with the 40mm lens , the new sensor and everything else like the GrII
Thanks for sharing. I think the GR3 is better than the GR2 and that's why I did not talk about it. These are all personal opinions and yours is as valid as mine. Maybe you should make your own review and then you'll get exactly what you want😀
@@mattisulanto well sure but on an eleven minute review , one would assume you could have used 20 seconds to mention that both models are very different . Unless you are of the opinion that the GR2 has ZERO advantages over the new model. 😌.
thanks for that. You should compare it for convenience and image quality with the RX100 series and the Lumix GX880; all lightweight suitable street cameras; perhaps also the Sony A6400 although that one is significantly heavier.
Thanks. See my latest video😀 The Sony RX100 series is excellent, but I don't really like zoom cameras and the A6400 is not comparable at all, it's too big and heavy.
@@mattisulanto yes your video came out at exactly the time i posted this.. thanks a lot for commenting. Guess I have to wait for someone else to do the pixel peeping.. I find the GX880 really sharp with 20mm and 42.5mm lenses.. The A6400 is twice as heavy indeed, though it is also an APS-C with fast autofocus.. you can put it in a coat pocket, but not in your jeans..
Hi Matti. Off Topic: Thanks for all your G9 videos showing you taking pictures with your glasses on. I finally gave that little dial next to the evf a try and between adjusting the evf for taking pictures with my glasses on and trusting the upgraded dual pixel Animal/Bird autofocus I am not missing nearly as many wildlife shots as before when taking my glasses off and using manual focus 🙂
Looks like a fun camera! I would prefer the GR3 if I had to use a camera with a lens that could not be swapped. 28mm is more suitable for my pictures. On your sneaky desk I also see a very flawed and therefore interesting camera, looking forward to a video from you on that one :-)
I respect your opinion. It would be no camera for me. As you mentioned in the video. Because of the limitation of fixed lens. My question: please can you shortly explain, what lens 28mm /40 mm is to choose for what kind of photography? Thanks, Chris
Be careful when buying these cameras because dust gets on their sensors and there's no way to clean them. My Ricoh GR2 is useless now. I wanted to get the GR3 or the X but in the end it will be a waste of money. I'll probably get a couple of months worth of shots but in the end there will be dust in that sensor.
Battery life is disastrous. 3 hours max. If you buy this camera you will need to buy additional batteries AND an external charger as the camera takes ages to recharge the battery.
Based on my experience it's not THAT bad, but if you keep the camera on all the time, the battery will go flat quite fast. However, there are other cameras with similar battery performance. The charger is good to have though.
@@biggstavros5876 I don't actively follow used prices, but I assume they are lower than new prices😀There is also the GRII, which is also a nice camera, but has a 28mm EQV lens. But of course everyone's budget is personal and even a €250 camera can be too expensive.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
2:03 you can buy coloured rings to put around the lens to set the two camera aside
Thanks for the tip!
Or use different colour wrist straps? 👍🏻
I love the 40mm focal length. It’s usually (not always, of course) easy to move back or forth a bit to get the framing I prefer, and gives a nice 3D look with a bit of background blur. And it’s sharp. Love, love love it.
Thanks for sharing! I have to agree😀
The title of this video says the Ricoh GR3x is the ultimate Street and travel Camera. I own the Ricoh GR3 and had been under the mistaken impression that the GR3 is the ultimate street and travel camera. I stand corrected! 😉
They both are the best😀
I think people like Cartier-Bresson would love this camera.
Absolutely. He would have loved it.
I think People like Cartier-Bresson would still shoot film!
Best review ive seen yet for the gr
Thanks!
Last night I had a good think about the GR3x and decided I could afford it without too much trouble so................ I made a plan to go out, drive to my usual shop about 25 miles away and get one. Then I woke up in reality..... and remembered the lack of optical viewfinder, fixed focal length lens, no flip out LCD (I take pictures of mushrooms, among other things, and it's difficult to get a good shot without one), and, from what I've heard on other RUclips videos, you just about need three spare batteries for a day trip. I've decide to wait and see - or maybe have a visit to the shop and see what else I could use, though the APS-C format, rather than the Micro4/3rds might not be easy to find.
Thanks for sharing.
There is the Fuji X70... Nice colors, flip screen, but no IS and 16mpx. Still an excellent camera.
I just got off the phone (... sorta speak!) With a techy from Ricoh. Although my issue was unrelated to the issue at hand here, I learnt a rather valuable bit of information from him....
The person suggested that although the idea of using a external adapter of any kind over the lens body of the camera - most likely that of the 75mm lens could possibly cause heat buildup of the sensor thus possibly rendering the warranty of the camera invalid.
Secondly; from years of watching RUclips channels (, like yours...) I've come to realize that when people don't like a product that someone is talking (reviewing in good faith) about, they sometimes discredit the item being discussed. Even so much as if they simply dislike the name of the product.
I never go by a single 'poll' rather it be a positive or negative response.
Your response to the 'bad' is a definite response.
That is interesting. I guess that depends a bit on many things. The heat build up, that is. I find it hard to believe, but I guess it can be possible in some scenario. I have to find out a bit more about that. Besides, over here the manufacturer would be liable for their products in any case, if the product is relatively new and used normally, like with their own tele converter or other accessory. Thanks for sharing anyway.
@@mattisulanto I suppose I should have mentioned the product I'm referring to is an after market brand. And not a Ricoh product. I think perhaps maybe it's Ricoh's way to discourage people from buying another brand name that's perfectly suitable for the same purpose. (As per my previous message.... My thoughts anyways!
@@willparsons32 Ok, that explains.
I bought a red "vanity" ring from JJC to replace the black lens ring on my GRiii so I can now tell them apart easily.
That's one way to do it.
I have put a lens protector on it to keep the dust out which can be a problem with the GRIII.
GRIII has a sensor self-cleaning feature, so sensor dust will be less of an issue than it was on GRII
Good to hear the x is as nice as the iii. If I had the funds I would also be tempted by it. I love the iii for many of the reasons you have said. I like doing double exposures and have bought a cheap finder that actually magnetically attaches to the LCD for those bright days when I really want to be able to check detail but the light is bouncing around. Also bought the Nisi filter kit, which is clever but as of yet I have not had much use for. But the great thing as you say is you can take this camera almost anywhere and pop it in a coat pocket or have it on a small belt pouch. I do however have a spare battery as multi exposure has to be done sequentially without turning the camera off. Great review Matty.
Thanks. I have to see if I can get a hold of the NiSi filter kit. It sounds interesting.
@@mattisulanto make sure you get the one that fixes to the camera, not the lens, otherwise when you turn off the camera in an absent moment your filters go smash Mattias Burling had a painful experience that way!
@@petegleeson1 Thanks for the tip.
The Nisi filter kit is so awesome.... I love mine. Take the time (I know, not always easy) to try it with any long exposure subject (water...) It's quite worth it and fun...
Nice accesories are the NISI Lens Adapter with the Filter Set. With this the GR3 is also a great camera for landscapes.
Thanks for the tip! I didn't know NiSi had such thing. I have to try to get that for a review.
@@mattisulanto Oh, yeah, and it's a pretty awesome kit, totally worth it...Best of both world, my Nisi kit for the GR II (not III or x) is also working perfectly with my Fuji X70 (GR II competition, with nicer colors out of the box to my taste, but both have pros and cons (vs the GR II)).
Thanks for the review. Very impressive camera and pictures. I would love to take pictures like these - but unfortunately I live in the tropics, so its a no go!
Thanks. We always see the greener grass on the other side. I'd like to be in the tropics, because I hate our cold winter😀
@@mattisulanto And for birding, wildlife, etc.
Use 2 different colored straps... I'm late to the game and just started using the GRIII last week and so far I love it.
You can also buy lens rings with different colors, maybe losing a bit of the inconspicuousness of the GRs.
I enjoyed this review very much. Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it!
As always, the photography lover comes through in your presentation. Your influences are found in my "pocket rocket" Lumix GX850/800 with either the 14-42mm power zoom, 14mm prime or Laowa 7.5mm attached. Fits in my pocket and works like a Swiss Army knife!😊 While the Ricoh appears to have killer image quality, the flexibility of a small m4/3 may be a better choice for most. It's sad that Panasonic no longer makes the GF9/GX850, but Olympus still has the PL10. Perhaps you could take a look at the PL10 compared with the Ricoh. Keep on sharing your love of photography!
Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts.
Lumix GX9 with 14mm Lumix lens will be the same kit you like. I own the GX-85 which is a nice little camera. In the USA they are now selling the GX-9 with 12-60mm lens for $799 US dollar. For the street, the Fujifilm X-E4 looks like one to consider, if wanting an APS-C camera, yet small, with changeable lenses.
Neither the E-PL9 nor E-PL10 take the VF4 EVF. Surely this was a backwards step? The E-PL8 was only ever a cosmetic update to the E-PL7, which is similar tiny size to the GR3. The PEN-F does have better IQ but is significantly bigger, are are the GX. The E-PL7/8 shares platform with the E-M10ii, the PEN-F with the E-M5ii. I like the tilt screen on the little camera but maybe not the big guns.
I have recently discovered my "problems" with poor photo IQ was not the camera but low resolution monitor - sorted with a UHD. (short version, my best monitor had failed and I was making-do with the FHD) Now back to two screens.
I brought mine a couple of years ago during the lockdown, but use a different lens setup 12-32, 20 and 42.5 to keep a small fit. The Laowa is on my wishlist. The 14mm I was put off with being a prime f2.5 but have seen some praise for it. Ideally, I'd like them to bring out a gm5 mark ii but alas I feel Panasonic will never go back to small and compact, I feel they are missing a trick, considering the second-hand market you can see there is definitely now a demand.
@@JamesWilliams-rw6qc I had a GM1 and one option with that was the little 12-32. I tried it with that and with the PZ14-42 I already had, and fancied the PZ the better due to the way it pops up automatically, and is a bit longer. I found the GM1 too small and fiddly and soon parted company.
The fast 20 is a must-have. The Oly 45 is nice, and small.
I had, long gone, an E-PL1 with the 14-42EZ. A rather nasty lens. The glass was alright but the way it operated was like a coffee grinder.
Yes I think Lumix should produce a MFT pocket camera like the PEN-Lite; The E-PL10 does nothing much better than the E-PL7 except video, and it has lost the shoe for the VF4 EVF. There again they have the LX series.
The 2015 GF7 was essentially a GM1 in a bigger body. The 2018 GF10 body is reminiscent of the E-PL1. But none have IBIS, which us useful for small no-OIS primes.
A tilt screen is useful for unobtrusive waist level shots.
Congratulations!!!!
Cute finnish accent. Like it.
I've always wanted one of those GR cameras but I have an E-M5 with 20mm f/1.7 Lumix that is small and fun enough. Nice photos, I especially like those on the bus.
Thanks for watching!
that 20mm is a great lens, and it was initially hard for me to want to give it up and switch out of MFT. But I can say that the IQ from the iiix is at least as good, if not a little bit BETTER, than that Pana 20mm. And the extra resolution of the 24mpx APS-C sensor means I have some more freedom to crop in when I want to. I do miss that f/1.7 max aperature, but the GRiiix is a more performant combo when it comes to focusing. BTW, I owned a GM5, an E-M10ii, and an E-M1ii with all the f/1.7 and f/1.8 primes, the 12-40mm PRO, and several standard zooms. When I dipped my toe into the GR world, I realized it was "the way" for me, and I sold off all my other MFT lenses and bodies.
@@OneHarp what pushed you to get the grx3 and sell the mfts? I got a gm1 with the 20mm 1.7 and am thinking of getting the GR3X. Looking for a ultimate pocket camera.
@@Nick-bj5pb I bought a used GRii to see if I liked the form factor, and was immediately sold on the GR series as the ultimate pocket cam. Upgraded to the GRiii (used), and then when the iiix came out I knew I could be happy with just those two cams and sold all my MFT gear to finance it. You just can't get a smaller form factor with a sensor this size, and the IQ is absolutely stellar. I have zero regrets.
What do you think of this in comparison to the GX9 using the 20mm pancake?
This is a good question. I also wonder how much better it is to go MFT and then to “compete” with Ricoh, just get tiny lenses. And then the advantage is when you don’t need the compactness, you could even put a giant 100-400 Leica for birding, haha.
The main difference is that the GX9 can take many lenses, but if you ignore that, then the GR wins hands down. The GR is smaller and has better image quality.
@@mattisulanto Should I ever decide to spend a lot more money on photography and get a larger primary body, I think the GR IIIx will be my way to keep the ability to stick a camera in my pocket.
@@mattisulanto Better than the Fujifilm X-E4? Where are those GRx cameras made? It is very unique. Great dynamic range is a plus. Having to use monitor can be a hassle if the sun glare becomes overwhelming. Anyway, take care, Loren
@@lorenschwiderski It's the best if you appreciate the tiny size and great IQ. The Fuji XE-4 is huge in comparison. They are made in Vietnam, I think.
For me those are the two “perfect” focal lengths. With my (film) Leica CL I use 28 and 40.
Thanks for sharing.
@@mattisulanto Matti, it just occurred to me that if you had the GR III Street Edition instead of the standard GR III, you could easily tell the two cameras apart 😂
The reason lens is so sharp (like with the GR/GR II) is that they had taken one lens element away with the GR III and they re-added one in the GRx.
Actually, the less glass the better assuming all the corrections are accomplished with existing elements. You want to minimize the number of elements in the light path where possible.
Is the iiix sharper than the iii?
I have the GR II and III (got the III refurb from Ricoh). These are the ne plus ultra of small cameras. I hope Ricoh can continue this line and keep improving it.
Thanks for sharing. I hope the same😀
@@mattisulanto Excellent reviews.
Great camera. I love the image quality and the ease of use.📷👍🏻
Thanks! 👍
2:36 Nice to see someone making pourovers with the Hario scales!
I don't have pourover equipment, but I always use fresh beans whether I make filter coffee or espresso😀
Hello Matti, what is, in your opinion, the best combination of focus distance and aperture (for snap focus mode) for street photography in good lighting conditions? For the Ricoh GR IIIx
There is no such thing in my opinion. My settings vary according to the situation.
@@mattisulanto Thanks.
Does the Ricoh GR IIIx match Leica quality ? How does it the lens compare with Leica 50mm APO?
What does it matter?
Hi Matti. Great vid on the GRx, i might make it a companion to my q2 then i think il have a great combo. I noticed you also have the FP and im curios about your thoughts on that as well. I was amazed by the compactness but i needed the evf for manual focus especialy in brighter conditions
Thanks. I have the fp L on loan from Sigma and I'm going to make a video about it soon. It's a fun camera, but has some quirks too😀
@@mattisulanto Quirky for sure, i just wish somebody would make a pancake 40mm for it 🙏
It’s a great camera for urban exploring, you can run pretty fast when you need to with such a small camera :)
You can probably run as fast as without a camera😀
@@mattisulanto Yes and still come away with large camera quality images :)
Hi - thanks for some nice videos - I looking in to the Ricoh GR, but I not sure if I should buy the 28 or 40mm - I both like shooting landscape, buildings and people - what would you recommend - I currently have an X100T but it stays more a home because of the size....
Thanks. I'm not sure if I can decide which lens you need😀 Maybe you go through your old photos and see which was your most used lens. That's going to give you some idea of what you may need.
@@mattisulanto Landscape ? you might want to elect the 28mm and use the internal crop mode (35/50) with the GR III.
@@alanalain4884 The 50mm crop is only about 7.5Mp, but that is one good option for those who don't need all the pixels. You can always crop in post, of course.
Nice alternative compared to some small form factor M43 or apsc lens combos. But.. I think i'm happier with an epl10 or similar with the 25mm f1.8 or other. I get to keep the lens or carry a second. Video ain't half too bad, and it has a chunky enough battery. It also means it can be a backup cam and use the same lenses as my more expensive m43 camera. I can see the appeal though.
Thanks for sharing!
Hi Matti, a bad thing actually, that I remember you making an enthousiastic video about the Panasonic LX100 II after shooting it for a longer period of time (1 or 2 years ago?). So what happened to the LX100 II and wouldn't it be nice to make a comparison between the Panasonic LX100 II and the GR3x?
The LX100II is a really nice camera and I still like it, but the GR3 is better for me. I'm only speaking for myself here, my personal opinion. I don't have the LX100II any more so can't make a comparison.
Sounds interesting, the battery life sorta is a downer. Is dust an issue or?
I have a GR playlist and in these videos you'll find my opinions on most GR3/x related issues: ruclips.net/p/PLkkZKkR0lgqkRwelW-mDgztjsEu3Im5TS
I ordered one the moment pre-orders opened, I love it.
Thanks for sharing.
Do I have to be worried about using the camera in cold weather? What is your experience with rain and cold weather? Everybody seems to think there are issues with no weather sealing, but who had real issues/camera not functioning/breaking?
I have had zero problems, but I can only speak for myself. I would not expose this camera to heavy rain though, because it's not weather sealed.
I would be very interested in a test with the teleconverter. Will it degrade the image quality? Will it kill the joy to use the GR3x, because of its size and weight? How easy and fast can you add and remove the teleconverter?
I will try to get the converters for testing.
£250 !!!!!!!!!!
@@williamdavid4823 if the image quality stays the same and easy to operate, 250 is a bargain. The alternative would be to take another camera with you with another lens, which will cost definitely more than 250.
Hi @@dirk.4711 It had better be good! .... but there is a video about it here on YT somewhere, showing the difference between the teleconverter results and cropping (not sure if it's the GR3 or GR3X) ... quite something when pixel peeping but barely noticeable when not.
But I am interested: would like to learn more about the teleconverter, see more comparisons with cropped images, also the long lens compression aspect.
Strange how ‘almost the perfect camera’ is about the most niche camera also. Boats are like that too. When I shot with film I bought a Vivitar Ultra Wide & Slim for $1.50 at a garage sale and I loved that camera. It was cheaply built but the images remind me of the Ricoh.
Thanks.
Have you got any dust on the image sensor?
No, I have not seen any dust on the sensor.
@@mattisulanto Ok. I have heard that this would have been a problem with the GR ii camera.
@@dagebostrom6223 I've heard the same, but have not yet seen it myself.
@@dagebostrom6223 I have the GRII and I do have a couple of dust spots. They are minor enough that lightroom gets rid of them. I am thinking about opening it up and cleaning it as per a video I found on RUclips. I only notice the dust on sky shots, and they come out in post easily enough. I wish it wasn't that way, though.
@@seanraz Dust on the sensor is a common problem in pocket zoom cameras. Of course, you can take them apart, but putting them back together is almost impossible.
How about durability of this camera? Is it made of durable material and well sealed against dust?
My cameras have had no problems regarding durability so far, but I guess any gadget can break. There have some dust issues and here is my take on that: ruclips.net/video/C8LhvXMlUq4/видео.html
Wonderfull review tankyou!
Glad you enjoyed it!
So you shoot work the lx100 much anymore? Been trying to decide on GR or Panasonic lx100ii. Mainly street photog and some city/architecture
I don't have the LX100II any more. That is also a nice camera, if you like a zoom. For me the GR works better, because I like prime lenses.
I have the original Ricoh GR (or GR1) when it was not too expensive. I quite like this camera but has stop using it because it has no Wifi to transfer my photo into my Tab. The Ricoh GR3 is good but is expensive and does not have a built-in flash which I find necessary for fill flash when I needed it. Having a hot shoe for an external flash is less useful because 1) Ricoh does not have a compact external flash and 2) the external flash may just be too cumbersome.
Meanwhile, I would just use a Olympus TG4 (for sheer versatility) or the Canon M100 or M6 Mk2 with the 22mm f/2.0 or to use with some TTArtisan manual focus lenses.
Thanks for sharing.
I like this concept. I used to want to buy something similar from Nikon. I no longer remember what model it was. I know it had the same sensor as the nikon D7000.
Thanks for sharing. Your Nikon camera must have been the Coolpix A.
@@mattisulanto Yes, it was... And Samsung, in its time, had an incredible APS-C 28mpx camera with just couple of lens, but it was quite something, very advanced for the time. I forgot what model though...
Aside from the megapixels. How do you find this handling against the oly tg-6? And does it have something like the oly live composite mode?
I have not used the TG-6 enough to compare. The GR has a composite mode, but I'm not sure if it's exactly like live comp. I have investigate that😀
Probubly asking this the wrong way but hope you understand: does dust stay out of the lens vs GRii?
Thanks.
I don't have any dust in my GR3/x, so I'd say dust is no problem, but as you probably know, there are other opinions too.
Would you say this will do well for concerts? I'm not that far from the stage but I do need to zoom a bit. and its a little bit dark :) Because my iphone does a bad job at it hahaha I'm looking to get my first camera, preferably compact too!
It depends on the photographer of course😀 If you are looking for a super compact camera with great image quality, then the GR3x might do the job. Another great compact is the Sony RX100IV.
@@mattisulanto Thank you!! Ill check the sony one too. I really loved the samples you showed here, hoping to achieve those kind of shots while documenting my family trips/ life stuff etc hahaha I still have so much to learn. Another question, might sound really dumb. Is the difference between a phone camera and a ricoh/sony huge? As a photography noob, some people are recommending me the S22 Ultra. But I know that a proper camera will do a better job, i just dont know how big the difference is. I've never owned one yet hahaha
@@min10596 Oh boy😀 The difference really depends on how the photo is being viewed and who took the photo. The best thing with phone cameras is that with them you can get very decent images with hardly any experience. On a phone screen all photos look really good, but on big screen you'll start to see differences.
@@mattisulanto Thats a really good explanation! Thank you once again!
Does this have single point autofocus or just the snap focus distance?
There are many AF options and single point is one of them.
@@mattisulanto thanks
I'd love one of those, but I suppose my GM1 does more or less the same thing for far less money. Would love to see a side by side comparison between the Ricoh(s), the Fuji XF-10 and any of the small Lumixes with 14mm or 20mm lenses.
Thanks. Your GM1 is great and it is an awesome street and travel camera too.
I switched from a GM5 with all the pancakes to using both GRiii and GRiiix. The Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 is a great lens, but the 40mm equiv lens on the GRiiix is equally stunning. The Panasonic wins in terms of overall aperture flexibility (f1/7 vs f/2.8), but the GR lens focuses much faster, and, paired with the more modern 24mpx APS-C sensor vs. the 16mpx MFT sensor, the IQ is stunning. FYI, The Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 cannot compare with the IQ of the 28mm equiv lens in the regular GRiii. I shot many great images with that GM5 and the 20mm (and relatively fewer great shots with that 14mm), but the move to the GRiii and iiix was a definite improvement. The only lens I miss from my MFT days is the Olympus 45mm f/1.8.
@@OneHarp I agree the IQ from the GR3/x is superb and you have to experience it to be able to fully appreciate it.
Thank you for your video. Between Ricoh GR IIIx and Lumix S5, which would you say is better for someone who wants to have both photos and videos? :D
Interesting comparison😀 Ricohs are not for video.
Is there durability improvements in the GR IIIx? Or just a lens change?
I don't know what is inside and what they did change. I didn't even know there were durability issues with the GR3.
I love my LX10
Does GR3x replace GR3 - or both are in production now?
Thanks for watching. Both are in production, which you can also easily verity from Ricoh home page😀
Thank You!
You're welcome!
I WANT ONE
Get one!😀
In the analog film era, most compact Cameras had either a 35mm, 38mm or 40mm, so the "40"mm on the Ricoh GRx makes good sense. I used the Minox 35ML which are great for fast street photography, it has a 35mm Lens. Later I used the Leica Minilux which have an excellent 40mm Lens.
Thanks for sharing.
Every time i buy one of these cameras they get dust on the sensor in a week or two and i end up returning them. I've tried three.
Oh wow! I haven't seen any dust yet on either sensor.
@@mattisulanto The snow of Finland keeps the dust down. 😁 🤣 😂
I use the filer adapter and a UV filer on mine. Yes, it makes the camera bigger but seems to solve the dust issue. It's still very small with the adapter on, just not jeans-pocketable.
You must be causing this yourself. Think how you might be doing it. My cameras have given me no problems in daily use.
@@andrewelliott4436 I don't know if that comment was directed at me. I'm very careful with my cameras in this regard. I've personally had no problem with my GR III; the GR II, which I've had for over five years, has one small dust spot, manageable, but nothing new since I started using the filter adapter and UV filter.
Like the portability of GR3, goes everywere
That and the great IQ are the best parts definitely.
Is it weather sealed?
No.
Thanks for doing that Matti. I've got the GAS.
Thanks for watching, and I'm sorry for the GAS😀
Hi Sulanto! Great review as always. I too am a fan boy of the GR III series. Particularly I like that it doesn’t have any view finder to keep the design slick. It’s not a camera for everyone as you said, but once someone falls in love with it, hard to let go. Hope Ricoh retains the exact design in future versions. Btw, do you know if the tele converter works with the 28 mm version and how much zoom it adds?
Thanks for sharing. I don't know if those converters are cross compatible, but I'll try the get them on loan and maybe I can find out.
@@mattisulanto thank you!
@@mattisulanto just one more thought - the 28 mm can landscape for sure. I rarely go wider than 28. I took it on a steep hike to the mountains last summer and came back with the best photo of my 2021 portfolio!
@@aviatorman8 Absolutely, you can shoot anything on the GR😀
@@mattisulanto true!
This is subjective of course, but much prefer the image quality on GR3 over any(and i mean it) Canon, Sony or Nikon camera.
I agree with you, photos from the GR3 look really good.
Just change the colored rings around the lens, they're available separately.
Thanks for the tip. You are about the 16th to suggest that😀
Just use diff color lense rings
How do u find Shutter Priority switch?
There is a mode dial next to the shutter. I think it would be a great idea to read the manual.
@@mattisulanto lol this camera doesn’t came with a manual. Disgrace really
Sounds good and the GR3 has always interested me.
But, and it's not a big but, I have been using the Olympus E-PL7 for virtually the same job. It is older but was state of the art when released in the back end of 2014, essentially an E-M10ii in a smaller body. Flip screen and will take the VF4 EVF. A little heavier but only a few millimetres bigger all round. Usually has the Lumix PZ14-42 glued to it, the pancake 20mm also lets it pocket.
Thanks for sharing. Any small MFT camera is good too for the same job, but not as good as the GR😀
@@mattisulanto Image quality or size or simplicity? I ask because you are familiar with MFT. You are carrying two GR.
@@jeffslade1892 I choose all of them and I think a pair of GRs is a really good solution. I really need to make a video where I compare the GRs and some small MFT camera.
Which is better for digitizing old photos, a camera setup or scanner?
Camera in my opinion.
Just bought the X100V but the size is so much better on this 😢
The Fuji has a VF and great looks too, so not all bad.
@@mattisulanto I'll end up getting the Ricoh as well 🤦🏻♂
Thanks for the video. Too bad it's a bit pricey. I got a used Lumix GM1 with the 1.8 pancake lense and it fits in my pocket and produces sharp image. . I like the flexibility of changing lens and I'm putting on a long telephoto lens tomorrow for a visit at the zoo.
Thanks for sharing.
made in vietnam ?
That's what it says on the sticker.
@@mattisulanto you
The problem with most of the GR3 reviews, including this one is that they never mentioned all the compromises that the new model makes compared to the GR2 in order to please the "must fit in my jean's pocket" crowd . For those who do not print big , they should learn about what the Gr II offered . for my work , there is no doubt that , outside the higher MP count sensor and a few other things (like internal memory , face detection and IBIS ) the Gr2 is a MUCH MORE VERSATILE camera than the Gr3 models . Wish Ricoh would make , even as a limited edition , a GRII X with the 40mm lens , the new sensor and everything else like the GrII
Thanks for sharing. I think the GR3 is better than the GR2 and that's why I did not talk about it. These are all personal opinions and yours is as valid as mine. Maybe you should make your own review and then you'll get exactly what you want😀
@@mattisulanto well sure but on an eleven minute review , one would assume you could have used 20 seconds to mention that both models are very different . Unless you are of the opinion that the GR2 has ZERO advantages over the new model. 😌.
@@Harold6643 Well, I did it like this and I'm sorry if my review was not perfect to you.
thanks for that. You should compare it for convenience and image quality with the RX100 series and the Lumix GX880; all lightweight suitable street cameras; perhaps also the Sony A6400 although that one is significantly heavier.
Thanks. See my latest video😀 The Sony RX100 series is excellent, but I don't really like zoom cameras and the A6400 is not comparable at all, it's too big and heavy.
@@mattisulanto yes your video came out at exactly the time i posted this.. thanks a lot for commenting. Guess I have to wait for someone else to do the pixel peeping.. I find the GX880 really sharp with 20mm and 42.5mm lenses.. The A6400 is twice as heavy indeed, though it is also an APS-C with fast autofocus.. you can put it in a coat pocket, but not in your jeans..
Hi Matti. Off Topic: Thanks for all your G9 videos showing you taking pictures with your glasses on. I finally gave that little dial next to the evf a try and between adjusting the evf for taking pictures with my glasses on and trusting the upgraded dual pixel Animal/Bird autofocus I am not missing nearly as many wildlife shots as before when taking my glasses off and using manual focus 🙂
Thanks. That little dial is really useful, if you wear glasses😀
Looks like a fun camera! I would prefer the GR3 if I had to use a camera with a lens that could not be swapped. 28mm is more suitable for my pictures.
On your sneaky desk I also see a very flawed and therefore interesting camera, looking forward to a video from you on that one :-)
Thanks. You are very perceptive😀
I respect your opinion. It would be no camera for me. As you mentioned in the video. Because of the limitation of fixed lens.
My question: please can you shortly explain, what lens 28mm /40 mm is to choose for what kind of photography? Thanks, Chris
Thanks for sharing. I think only your imagination limits what you can shoot on each lens😀
That's a wise answer. 🤣
you say an "end of term review, using this camera about a month and a half"?
Did I really say that?😀 Well, take a look at some of my later GR3 videos after some more time with the GR3 and the GR3x.
"Uncompromising" is the correct English term.
Is it really? English language is my fourth language and I know I make a lot of mistakes, but I try my best.
Be careful when buying these cameras because dust gets on their sensors and there's no way to clean them. My Ricoh GR2 is useless now. I wanted to get the GR3 or the X but in the end it will be a waste of money. I'll probably get a couple of months worth of shots but in the end there will be dust in that sensor.
What did you do then
@@waitandhopefr
Ricoh literally offers a cleaning service
Battery life is disastrous. 3 hours max. If you buy this camera you will need to buy additional batteries AND an external charger as the camera takes ages to recharge the battery.
Based on my experience it's not THAT bad, but if you keep the camera on all the time, the battery will go flat quite fast. However, there are other cameras with similar battery performance. The charger is good to have though.
@@mattisulanto but if you don’t keep the camera on all the time where is the intuitive response to the environment?
@@rogertebb1997 We all have a bit different approach I guess😀
First!😂
Buy a different coloured, front ring to tell the difference
Thanks for tip. You are about the 52nd commenter to suggest that😀
For me the major downside is the massive color fringing that is killing many of my shots. Otherwise it is a fine camera.
Another problem that I have never noticed no matter how I pixel peep.
Storage in your pocket may not be good for this camera.
You are absolutely right, it's not the way to treat a camera😀
Very nice camera but very expensive to buy. Not ideal for an amateur on a budget.
No new camera is good for a low budget, but you can always find a used one.
@@mattisulanto Have you seen the prices of used ones?
@@biggstavros5876 I don't actively follow used prices, but I assume they are lower than new prices😀There is also the GRII, which is also a nice camera, but has a 28mm EQV lens. But of course everyone's budget is personal and even a €250 camera can be too expensive.
@@mattisulanto Thanks for clarifying your view. I agree.
'the battery life is sh.....ort.'
Pretty bad battery life
No aditional information! In my opinion....(I use the Rx 100iii)
Yeah, the GR info does not apply to a Sony😀
I honestly don't understand the hype around this camera. In my opinion it is overpriced and overrated.
Thanks for your opinion😀
Which camera would you recommend?