It’s just a cube that has been scrambled in a specific order and then the motors fire in that exact order but backwards. There is no camera or sensors to see the cubes original state, he could enter it manually, but it still has no way to spin the top or bottom layer and it never spins one side more than 1 turn (90 degrees). So to make sure I was not wrong, I took the time to enter the original state of the cube in my app for Rubik’s solving, and shocker, it turns out it’s only scrambled on the left right front and back sides, not one turn on bottom or top, that would be a veeeeeeeery small chance of a random scramble to look like that!
Not accurate. It randomly scrambles a solved cube, so it knows the state of the cube as the motors turn (which is why we don't need cameras). It uses this Python library (pypi.org/project/rubik-solver/) to input the state of the cube and output the corresponding algo to solve. We take that output and send commands to the motor to solve
I am making Rubix's cube solver robot. but it's not rotating the 90degrees accurately. I calculated the distance accurately and Even considered 5% tolarance. how to rectify the problem. I am using Kociemba with 6 stepper motors. will you please give your mail
Can you explain to us what parts you used, how you installed them, and what is the correct programming for the parts, i.e. there is no video in detail?!
In terms of motors, he may have used NEMA17 motors. The shaft doesnt look like that, and he may have added some plastic extension for each motor shaft that is either super glued to the center pieces or is physically inside the center piece. The support beams are aluminum "x" rails. The items that support the NEMA17 motors may have been 3D printed. I would have to take a guess that he used four L298 motors drivers (one L298 driver per motor) He may have had at least two separate arduino boards, where one arduino would sent signals to two L298 motor drivers
Probably not because its not accually a smart robot that knows it’s mission. It’s just a cube that has been scrambled in a specific order and then the motors fire in that exact order but backwards. There is no camera or sensors to see the cubes original state, he could enter it manually, but it still has no way to spin the top or bottom layer and it never spins one side more than 1 turn (90 degrees). So to make sure I was not wrong, I took the time to enter the original state of the cube in my app for Rubik’s solving, and shocker, it turns out it’s only scrambled on the left right front and back sides, not one turn on bottom or top, that would be a veeeeeeeery small chance of a random scramble to look like that!
I know there's no z-axis movement, but all the same, interesting setup. Just ordered 2020 aluminium extrusion and bearings and this has some similarities to what I'm aming for.
I see a flaw here. Surely that is fast but it's moving only 2 axis - so you could not make it assemble totally mixed cube. Good job, but not a real rubics cube resolver...
This is a 3x3 Rubik's cube and the middle where the servo motor is attached has different color, so the question is what happens when 2 of the servo motor has the same color?
what it will not solve in 0.0000000000001 seconds is something that looks like it will until you notice there is no top piece it is a single turn on the top
It’s just a cube that has been scrambled in a specific order and then the motors fire in that exact order but backwards. There is no camera or sensors to see the cubes original state, he could enter it manually, but it still has no way to spin the top or bottom layer and it never spins one side more than 1 turn (90 degrees).
So to make sure I was not wrong, I took the time to enter the original state of the cube in my app for Rubik’s solving, and shocker, it turns out it’s only scrambled on the left right front and back sides, not one turn on bottom or top, that would be a veeeeeeeery small chance of a random scramble to look like that!
Not accurate. It randomly scrambles a solved cube, so it knows the state of the cube as the motors turn (which is why we don't need cameras).
It uses this Python library (pypi.org/project/rubik-solver/) to input the state of the cube and output the corresponding algo to solve. We take that output and send commands to the motor to solve
@@nick_oharascramble it by hand and than place the cube on your little machine.
I am making Rubix's cube solver robot. but it's not rotating the 90degrees accurately. I calculated the distance accurately and Even considered 5% tolarance. how to rectify the problem.
I am using Kociemba with 6 stepper motors.
will you please give your mail
❤❤🎉 a Rubik's cube five nights atenea
@@dirkdiggler2430then it would go back to the original scrambled state after scrambling it.
NOW EVEN MAX PARKS WORLD RECORD BEATSVTHIS ONE 😂😂
yeah he beat it now
2ith 0.04@@Waveyy2
You are gonna see your comment in a few years and feel ashamed
fun fact ：there‘s another cube robot that just takes 0.1 second to solve it
It is fantastic.. but its upper and lower sides are not moving....
Hey, I was wondering what stepper motors you used.
they look like NEMA 17 but i could be wrong
Yes, they ar NEMA 17s. I'm making a pen plotter with them.
You break the world record 😊😊😊
The WR is 3.13 by Max Park
no he didnt
Can you explain to us what parts you used, how you installed them, and what is the correct programming for the parts, i.e. there is no video in detail?!
In terms of motors, he may have used NEMA17 motors. The shaft doesnt look like that, and he may have added some plastic extension for each motor shaft that is either super glued to the center pieces or is physically inside the center piece.
The support beams are aluminum "x" rails.
The items that support the NEMA17 motors may have been 3D printed.
I would have to take a guess that he used four L298 motors drivers (one L298 driver per motor)
He may have had at least two separate arduino boards, where one arduino would sent signals to two L298 motor drivers
Can you make a tutorial video of this robot please
and then tymon kolasìnski do a 2.98😂
And then fahmi does 2.35
Yiheng Wang 2.44
And there is one robot that solve in 0.38 second
Nope
Nope@@table5584
Can you make the d part?
And upART
I was looking for that video !
How much does it cost
Tymon
is so cool 😎
Yeah but it already has a solved EO. You can tell by the fact that it's solved only using 4 faces. To solve a general case you need at least 5 faces.
Amazing, but my friend is a human and does it just 3 seconds slower
I can't tell if this is a joke or not
Slower than the fastest cuber single record. But still impressed. I'm sure you can build one to solve it in 1 second or less.
Max can beat that robot
Very difficult
0.04 distance than Max s' 3.13 Official Single
Yiheng Wang is faster than that robot
No
😂😂 feel bad for the People that think it's true😂😂
Finally a video of it solving a Rubik's Cube! I hope there will be a full-length video about this whole project soon.
Probably not because its not accually a smart robot that knows it’s mission. It’s just a cube that has been scrambled in a specific order and then the motors fire in that exact order but backwards. There is no camera or sensors to see the cubes original state, he could enter it manually, but it still has no way to spin the top or bottom layer and it never spins one side more than 1 turn (90 degrees).
So to make sure I was not wrong, I took the time to enter the original state of the cube in my app for Rubik’s solving, and shocker, it turns out it’s only scrambled on the left right front and back sides, not one turn on bottom or top, that would be a veeeeeeeery small chance of a random scramble to look like that!
Hi!, where can I find the code?, I woul'd like to see it
I know there's no z-axis movement, but all the same, interesting setup. Just ordered 2020 aluminium extrusion and bearings and this has some similarities to what I'm aming for.
But how do you do
🧐😲👏👏
sem Tu sem Rubik's Cube
Veery fast because it beat the Rubik’k cube world record
, ਪਲੀਜ ਹੌਲੀ ਹੌਲੀ ਕਰਕੇ ਦਿਖਾਓ ਮੈਂ ਵੀ ਕਰ ਪਾਵਾਂ
..but can it solve a mirror cube..?
Now try all 6 sides
Yi heng laughing in the corner
You should try to get it faster than the record 3.14
slowly mo nga naman
WOW
Max park was faster than that 3.13 sec
I have Gan robot they seem the exact same
I see a flaw here. Surely that is fast but it's moving only 2 axis - so you could not make it assemble totally mixed cube. Good job, but not a real rubics cube resolver...
Any chance you can show the wiring?
From my guess, he may have had to have used 4 separate L298 motor drivers (1motor driver per motor)
Seems like Max Park is faster😅
Tell me how to make it plz
blud just made new recored
Max Park: Pathetic
This thing didnt even beat human record lol
Wait really?
@@yalc-04 people are sub 3 already
By hand
It's Robot Teaching and reverse sequence play
How did you connect the stepper motor to the cube so it could turn the cube
I don't think I have a rubik's cube the cubes or sides or colours are just two triangle ramps togther
1- specific scramble 2- even eith that scramble it didn't even break the world record
cool
3 seconds😮
3.57seconds!?
3.17 dummy
Kahan milta hai
Bro, that robot is pretty slow
Bro thats slower than WR
But max park is faster, he did 3.13 solve
Literally slower than the human world record😂
Faster than 99% of us tbf
Tem um ok 3x3 🤖
Yo what is that called
I literally have a 2 x 2 and I literally beat it
Didn't beat the world record though 3.14 seconds
This is a 3x3 Rubik's cube and the middle where the servo motor is attached has different color, so the question is what happens when 2 of the servo motor has the same color?
What kind of god like moves do you know to Change the middle pieces on a Rubiks cube? 😂
Max park is faster than the robot
Still not world record😂😂😂
But world record is 3.13 😂😂😅😅
And it can turn with only 4 sides. 👀
love
try faster than 0.38 seconds I hope!
That clap made me laugh until I fell to the floor😅😆
what it will not solve in 0.0000000000001 seconds is something that looks like it will until you notice there is no top piece it is a single turn on the top
Recoed 3.47
Max park has 3.13
Slowest than Max park
Wr is faster (3.13) by max park
World record is 3.1 second 😉
Doesnt beat the wr 💀
Still really good though
Wao
It didn't break the Record😂
malades!
how u slove this on code
max park 3:13 SECONDS
Not impressed ... humans created robot
all center rubic is jamed
no movement
❤❤❤❤
Formula
But the question is, did you just reverse the code that was used to scramble it? :-)
Negative! Check out my TikTok or IG to see how the algo works
People from 2018 to 2022 it beat the world record
People of 2023 almost did it
Yeah u just played that backwards
There was a bot i saw it it solved in 0.38
The real record is 3.13
Slick AF!
Its just doing the same pattern and doing it in reverse look at he’s other videos same pattern
3秒57弱?
Max park is faster
Not faster than max park
Lol cuase world record is 3.13 rn
It's not 0.01 is
still not faster than WR tho off by 40 ms >:)
how does it do horizontal turns? there doesnt seem to be a bottom motor, and neither is there a motor at the top???
World record is even faster😂😂😂😂
Qotag'immi yebsan
Vikunanavada
Not wr
I’ve seen faster