The secret to this machine is to decouple the input from the output, that is the reason Skinner used a back and forth motion, on the fitst stage, to entrain the second stage to continuously fall - That is missing from your first stage - If you do that, then you can design in the right moment to move the lever, when least input is required - I think your build quality is superior to any other builds I've seen, I like the quietness of it - Another thing you could do is build three of these machines, small to large, with original input to the small and that machines output becomes input to next size up, etc. - If you could do that, then O.U. would be obvious, if it was there, even before measurment, final proof is handling actual load, and closing the loop would be easy - Armando, tell me what you think of this comment
William Skinner is an early inspiration for many dated to 1939, however, Skinner's device appears to suffer from what I call 'mass eventropy': in other words, lack of exponential.
Non c'è bisogno che tu lo chieda a nessuno. La potenza in uscita è strettamente meno di quella in entrata. Semplice no? Insomma un modo piuttosto stupido di consumare corrente.
@@paolophoenix Non dargli filo da torcere, sta sperimentando. Normalmente hai ragione, che "La potenza di uscita è rigorosamente inferiore alla potenza di ingresso". Ma quest'uomo ha fatto molti sforzi per moltiplicare la potenza di uscita. Quello che la gente non capisce, il grande aggeggio non lo rende migliore.
Since 15 years, I have been dealing with angular energy electricity generation systems (R&D). My positive designs about angular continue. In this regard, my own financial means are insufficient, I had meetings with many businessmen, they accepted the financing of the project, but they gave up when it came to signing a protocol, that is, when it came to formalisation. If there is an entrepreneur who will take firm steps with me on this path, who is idealistic, has financial means and wants to make an official protocol, I would like to meet. 98% of the published videos are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.
@@Dim-Art Ну так расскажи. Ты на картинку смотришь и рассуждаешь , а я месяц жизни убил чтоб собрать подобную конструкцию, и убедился насколько она бесталкова. А в начале так же верил в еë работоспособность.
Я не на картинку смотрю. Сам собирал. Но это другая история. Принцип действия там в том, что верхняя часть создаёт смещение рабочей точки нижней части. И получается аналогия с постоянно падающим грузом. Если ты делал то поймёшь о чем я.
@@nel_dubbio_mena Yes, it does convert gravity to electrical energy, however, if it creates more energy than its input, then why is it not connected in a closed loop? I.E. Output, running the input? To do this, It would require more energy generated than it takes to raise the weight back up. Not possible.
@@valveman12 You dont know if it requires more energy: the weight falling generates a work that charges a battery. The movement is not up and down but its circular and involves inertia too, its not just a weight that falls and stops when touches the bottom, it returns up a bit. I saw a machine made in a different way but works with the same way and the electricity generated is a bit more than the one used to make the machine going.
@@nel_dubbio_mena Regardless if the object is moving up and down or in a circular motion, you still cannot create more energy out than put in. Do you realize this design is decades old and it never worked then, and it does not work now? Don't believe me, build one and make a video.
The secret to this machine is to decouple the input from the output, that is the reason Skinner used a back and forth motion, on the fitst stage, to entrain the second stage to continuously fall - That is missing from your first stage - If you do that, then you can design in the right moment to move the lever, when least input is required - I think your build quality is superior to any other builds I've seen, I like the quietness of it - Another thing you could do is build three of these machines, small to large, with original input to the small and that machines output becomes input to next size up, etc. - If you could do that, then O.U. would be obvious, if it was there, even before measurment, final proof is handling actual load, and closing the loop would be easy - Armando, tell me what you think of this comment
William Skinner is an early inspiration for many dated to 1939, however, Skinner's device appears to suffer from what I call 'mass eventropy': in other words, lack of exponential.
Excellent design, works just as intended. and very quiet too. please show any power generation. thankyou
Nice
cuanta energia entra? y cuanta energia sale?
asi de facil es el problema.
transferi o giro de baixo para o giro de Sima que dá certo já calculei
use uma regulado de velocidade ,
depois .
A si sisi ciao ahahahahahahhaha.
Armando, questo è un bel lavoro.
Per favore, dicci cosa sta succedendo qui. Quanti watt entrano e quanta potenza esce? Grazie in anticipo.
Non c'è bisogno che tu lo chieda a nessuno. La potenza in uscita è strettamente meno di quella in entrata. Semplice no? Insomma un modo piuttosto stupido di consumare corrente.
@@paolophoenix Non dargli filo da torcere, sta sperimentando. Normalmente hai ragione, che "La potenza di uscita è rigorosamente inferiore alla potenza di ingresso". Ma quest'uomo ha fatto molti sforzi per moltiplicare la potenza di uscita.
Quello che la gente non capisce, il grande aggeggio non lo rende migliore.
@@paolophoenix
Se sfrutti la gravità la potenza di uscita potrebbe essere maggiore di.quella in entrata
@@nel_dubbio_mena ..GIA' FATTO.....NON FUNZIONA!
Un'altrooooo...! ma questi non si stancano mai di buttar via soldi e tempo per costruire dei tarocchi?
No apto para incrédulos! Pero es verdad, funciona!
Посмотрите ролик Сергей Стришко вечный двигатель
Вроде должно работать, только почему ремень скинул с гена.
Ma vaaaaaa! Quando stacchi la spina si ferma tutto.
Since 15 years, I have been dealing with angular energy electricity generation systems (R&D). My positive designs about angular continue. In this regard, my own financial means are insufficient, I had meetings with many businessmen, they accepted the financing of the project, but they gave up when it came to signing a protocol, that is, when it came to formalisation. If there is an entrepreneur who will take firm steps with me on this path, who is idealistic, has financial means and wants to make an official protocol, I would like to meet. 98% of the published videos are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.
Делал такую конструкцию, не рабочая! Соеденив двигатель на прямую с генератором результат на выходе получил меньше, поэтому нет смысла от рычагов.
Дело не в рычагах! Если так говоришь, значит не понял принципа работы.
@@Dim-Art Ну так расскажи. Ты на картинку смотришь и рассуждаешь , а я месяц жизни убил чтоб собрать подобную конструкцию, и убедился насколько она бесталкова. А в начале так же верил в еë работоспособность.
Я не на картинку смотрю. Сам собирал. Но это другая история.
Принцип действия там в том, что верхняя часть создаёт смещение рабочей точки нижней части. И получается аналогия с постоянно падающим грузом. Если ты делал то поймёшь о чем я.
За твои эксперименты с ротовертом тебе респект🤝👍
@@Dim-Art Всë ясно.Самое обидное что не работает.
This does not create more energy than you put into it. Just not possible. Kudos for trying it though.
It's possible if the machine converts the gravity to electrical energy
@@nel_dubbio_mena
Yes, it does convert gravity to electrical energy, however, if it creates more energy than its input, then why is it not connected in a closed loop? I.E. Output, running the input? To do this, It would require more energy generated than it takes to raise the weight back up. Not possible.
@@valveman12
You dont know if it requires more energy: the weight falling generates a work that charges a battery. The movement is not up and down but its circular and involves inertia too, its not just a weight that falls and stops when touches the bottom, it returns up a bit.
I saw a machine made in a different way but works with the same way and the electricity generated is a bit more than the one used to make the machine going.
@@nel_dubbio_mena
Regardless if the object is moving up and down or in a circular motion, you still cannot create more energy out than put in. Do you realize this design is decades old and it never worked then, and it does not work now? Don't believe me, build one and make a video.
@@valveman12
Read something about the machine of Orfirius.
Que c.o.j.o.n.e.s. es eso , ni explican nada ni se ve que hace .👎👎👎👎