Видео

It's very hard work

I am from India

Nice

Since 15 years, I have been dealing with angular energy electricity generation systems (R&D). My positive designs about angular continue. In this regard, my own financial means are insufficient, I had meetings with many businessmen, they accepted the financing of the project, but they gave up when it came to signing a protocol, that is, when it came to formalisation. If there is an entrepreneur who will take firm steps with me on this path, who is idealistic, has financial means and wants to make an official protocol, I would like to meet. 98% of the published videos are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.

No apto para incrédulos! Pero es verdad, funciona!

Dopo la vaccinazione le strade sono diventate più vuote. Al Jolly Market ho avuto alcune conversazioni con persone che hanno perso familiari a causa della vaccinazione.

In analyzing the best I can from watching the original Skinner video and experimenting myself you have to think about what is actually happening. there are four key facts that are happening and have to function together for this device to harvest gravity. You must have a weight, a mass, then you must have a lever in order to use leverage to manipulate the mass into a position where gravity can act on it. then you must have an oscillation created by the falling mass. I believe you can come up with other methods of harvesting gravity if you keep those same principles in the design. I'm not a believer in the elliptical theory of the lever. Yes the weights have to be lifted in order to fall and that is what the lever does to the first weight, it lifts it but also tilt's it. Once the weight is lifted by leverage and tilted, gravity can now act on it pulling it back down but it never reaches the bottom because the lever is continually lifting and tilting the weight, it's like surfing on an ocean wave, The wave lifts the surfboard and gravity causes the surfboard to fall but it never reaches the bottom because the wave continually lifts the surfboard. There is no jerking motions here which would be present in a elliptical orbit speeding up and slowing down. This machine has a smooth even continual rotation. The lever is lifting the weight but it's also kind of pushing the weight at the same time, just like the wave is doing to the surfboard. The second stage is exactly the same as the first stage only the second stage is being driven by a more powerful force. The second stage has its lever but it’s lever is driven by the first heavy mass instead of a small motor. The more leverage you use By increasing the length of the lever, the less power you will need to lift the mass and so you could increase the size of the mass. However increasing the lever length will also require a larger diameter circular path for the lever to make in order to lift the mass to a good height for gravity to act on it. The length of the lever and how far it protrudes out of the gimbal at the bottom will determine along with the Circular path the lever makes, how high the mass will be lifted. Also consider how the mass is falling, You are creating a incline a ramp and the higher you lift the mass the steeper the ramp or incline becomes. The steeper the ramp the higher the falling force of the mass. Another issue will be in balancing the weights, The first stage only has so much power and can only lift a certain amount of mass in the second stage, if you use too heavy of weight in the second stage the first stage wont be able to lift it. And if you don’t use enough weight in the second stage your power Amplification factor will be low. I would build the top section first, The motor size, the lengths of the lever arms and the size of the mass are all relative, consider them in relation and proportion to each other in order to tune the machine. You can make the levers longer or shorter you can increase the drive motor size you just have to adjust the size of the mass so the motor can drive it without overheating but remember to size your secondary mass large enough to create the maximum amplification.

Nice demonstration. One of the best I have seen with William Skinner's design. It is running nearly perfectly by Skinner's standards, unless there is a design component missing. I would guess the key problem with Skinner is you need a vertical component to gain energy. The efficiency between the vertical and horizontal by reducing resistance on the horizontal is what must be used to create energy. Skinner's device does not have a vertical component, and I am not sure if it uses the horizontal efficiently enough since there is no vertical being used as an input.

William Skinner is an early inspiration for many dated to 1939, however, Skinner's device appears to suffer from what I call 'mass eventropy': in other words, lack of exponential.

Ma vaaaaaa! Quando stacchi la spina si ferma tutto.

Few understand the principal at work here. The device will work best as a multilevel device (about 10 levels) where each level up is reduced in size. Rotating the top level will take little effort but create a cascading chain reaction twist on the successive levels below as they attempt to align with the levels above. Like knocking over a gigantic domino using smaller and smaller dominos.

In questo modo generatore di Bedini sarebbe più efficace! Bello!

Salve. Suo lavoro è impressionante! Non ho ben capito la funzione del peso superiore. Secondo lei, potrebbe funzionare senza lui? In proporzione, quanta potenza si può avere in uscita rispetto a quella in entrata? Grazie! Auguri per il lavoro!

The secret to this machine is to decouple the input from the output, that is the reason Skinner used a back and forth motion, on the fitst stage, to entrain the second stage to continuously fall - That is missing from your first stage - If you do that, then you can design in the right moment to move the lever, when least input is required - I think your build quality is superior to any other builds I've seen, I like the quietness of it - Another thing you could do is build three of these machines, small to large, with original input to the small and that machines output becomes input to next size up, etc. - If you could do that, then O.U. would be obvious, if it was there, even before measurment, final proof is handling actual load, and closing the loop would be easy - Armando, tell me what you think of this comment

Awesome now please speak and tell us how it works and give us the input energy versus the output energy. Remember this is not about getting rich it’s about teaching the public you can harvest gravity and get a source of cheap energy other than paying through the nose for it share your knowledge as I will share mine

please connect consumer and measure current Thank you

Armando. There seems to be a lot of energy waste in the output sector. You could try direct coupling a generator, like the Fisher and Pykel washing machine motor, to the bottom of the out put swivel, doing away with the CV joint. In my opinion the problem you experience with the top sector dropping out, is due to trying to extract too much energy which drives the weight over the swashplates high point. The best angle between the the drive and driven plate is 90 degrees on the swash plate in other words the steepest angle on the plate, the swashplate being the theoretical path the weight takes as it turns. This exact angle can only be maintained by drawing the exact amount of energy from the system and that could be done by adjusting the charge rate for the batteries. Otherwise what you have built is correct. Well done. More weight and more speed.

Armandos reply in English...Unfortunately, I didn't have time to run the tests I wanted. However, I noticed that under load it tends to disengage from the coupling of the first stage of the movement, as it is not a drag with an integral part but due to the eccentricity of the grip. I am not satisfied with my test

transferi o giro de baixo para o giro de Sima que dá certo já calculei use uma regulado de velocidade , depois .

Sono curioso della differenza di efficienza tra il modello a colonna singola e il modello a 4 colonne. Ho costruito 3 modelli a colonna singola che non hanno mostrato alcun guadagno. Ho trovato un modello a 2 colonne che ha dimostrato l'effetto di controbilanciamento e annullamento delle perdite tra 2 colonne, fuori fase a 90 gradi. È logico che, se due coppie di colonne fossero fuori fase di 90 o 180 gradi dall'altra coppia, il controbilanciamento e la cancellazione della perdita, l'effetto sarebbe osservato nell'intero ciclo di 360 gradi e spiegherebbe perché Skinner ha utilizzato 4 colonne . Ciò suggerisce anche che non si possono semplicemente aggiungere colonne singole aggiuntive, né coppie, e si dovrebbe raddoppiare il numero di colonne ad ogni scala in su..... 2, 4, 8, 16, ecc. Numero totale di colonne divisibile per 4 e tutti in fasi a 90 gradi, da colonna a colonna, da coppia a coppia, da set a set e da gruppo a gruppo. Se il principio è funzionale, allora ogni colonna dovrebbe produrre una coppia sufficiente per funzionare da sola, ma non può farlo, continuamente, senza il controbilanciamento e l'inerzia della sua coppia di accoppiamento e l'inerzia dell'insieme del suo accoppiamento di serie.

Everyone keeps saying that the upper levers are rotating in a elliptical pattern yours are obviously going in a circular pattern and to me I think the circular pattern is correct there are too many problems with an elliptical pattern . It would be nice if you could respond to some of our questions so we can learn more about how your system works

Watts in / watts out ??? PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION

A si sisi ciao ahahahahahahhaha.

Dos it give over unity output?

This does not create more energy than you put into it. Just not possible. Kudos for trying it though.

Un'altrooooo...! ma questi non si stancano mai di buttar via soldi e tempo per costruire dei tarocchi?

Ciao Armando bravo 👏 super esperimento

cuanta energia entra? y cuanta energia sale? asi de facil es el problema.

انا سعيد بالتعرف على قناتك

Excellent design, works just as intended. and very quiet too. please show any power generation. thankyou

Armando, questo è un bel lavoro. Per favore, dicci cosa sta succedendo qui. Quanti watt entrano e quanta potenza esce? Grazie in anticipo.

Вроде должно работать, только почему ремень скинул с гена.

Que c.o.j.o.n.e.s. es eso , ni explican nada ni se ve que hace .👎👎👎👎

Salve, funziona senza problemi?

The pattern of motion at the top it looks to be incorrect. Skinner's top weights seem to be 90 degrees out of phase with the motion of the top bars. So perhaps they are not really turning the top weights, they are "running away" or "falling away" from the top weights, making it effortless to turn them. If you looks closely at the Historic Images photo of the Skinner machine, there are what appears to be rollers on the right side of the top pulleys.

Bravo 👏👏👏👏👏

salve, qualcuna novita? Grazie mille

Посмотрите ролик Сергей Стришко вечный двигатель

Делал такую конструкцию, не рабочая! Соеденив двигатель на прямую с генератором результат на выходе получил меньше, поэтому нет смысла от рычагов.

we have created artificial pressure between the water and the body, and the body always tends upward, and thus the perpetual motion machine will rotate, but we need to split it in half so that one half is in water and the other is on land. in the air ruclips.net/video/bgJ7F3-4nU8/видео.html

How you make this machine

Is it a self running machine ?

hi sir his device is really in working

Gentile Armando Sabella, se vuole possiamo fare l'analisi del circuito per capire tempi, fasi, percorsi della corrente in relazione alla tensione, potenza e frequenza di lavoro. Le lascio il mio contatto email a.favari@gmail.com Le ho anche chiesto il contatto su fb se preferisce messenger. Buona giornata

watts in / watts out?

Frumos bravo este rentabila inventia si eu am aceasta pasiune am construit si eu in Rominia ceva de 5kw 3 faze te apreciez

Hola, excelente trabajo, gracias por compartir, usas telegrama,? Puedo compartir algunos datos de mis trabajos...

davvero molto interessante... non fai piu' esperimenti?

Hello. I want to build such a leveled motor for a powerful turbo fan. need a minimum input power of the motor and a huge rotational speed of 50,000-100,000 ppm, can you give any advice? Need a thick shaft for vibration damping right?