Important clarification: regardless of gender, if your forehead is big, you're more likely to be a boy kisser, and if it's smaller - you're more likely to be a girl kisser
Our faces constantly morph between two different faces, and then once we officially "choose a side" our faces do one final transformation at a side-choosing ceremony and we discover the true face that was inside us all along
Yes finally someone has said it! They have this really strange glint in their eye, its kind of sleepily, emotive, I can't explain it but add it with the more animates facial movements, its all rather perculiar.
Both you guys speak with wide eyes and raised eyebrows which is commonly associated with a female's facial expression. So, it's not your face per se, it's the expressions you cast.
Hmmm, I feel simultaneously like this totally might be a thing, but at the same time, feel like there is a huge chance there is just some reaaaaally subtle bias here in some way. Like, there's a lot of behavioral things that can affect face pics even if you remove makeup and hair and the like, and it's just really hard to control for that. But hey, I haven't read the research, so idk lol.
at least re: the external perception part. i do agree that expression/behavioral things are definitely a factor in real life, but I do also think this is a thing to a certain extent
I want to see a study comparing the facial structure of men/women who prefer chocolate ice cream vs. vanilla ice cream. I’ll even make a bet that some level of discernible difference might be discovered.
@@WhichDoctor1 Agreed. But these are not simply correlations here. The researchers in at least two of the articles I've read so far (sources in the vid description) conducted actual experiments with true independent variables and control conditions/groups. The effect sizes were strong and statistically significant. These studies appear in respected scientific journals with high impact factors
@@Meccarox I wonder the same thing as you. What are the specific "lies and very wrong". I hate it when people bring a strong opinion into their comments without elaborating. This is a science channel. We're only interested if they have more than only essentially "no, disagree" as a comment. Specific claims and specific counters? I'd like to read it.
You’re ridiculous for thinking this anything new, or a new idea, or that data and inquires haven’t been collected on this for over a century. There’s nothing definitive to work with much less weaponize; what you should be concerned with is if it’s ever discovered to be a gene, as gene manipulation is going to become very prevalent over the coming decades.
Even as a lesbian, I really got a bad gaydar. I can't tell someone's sexuality just by looking at them. Most of the time, I know someone's sexuality because I talked with them and become friends but even so I am not interested in most lesbians unless they are my type of woman with my criteria.
@@Δ-Δ-Δ-Δ the one who is strong, respectful and loyal. I am so picky. lol. I want someone who is really good at their job and also good at housework. I don't want someone who give away all their femininity for the sake of looking butch or whatever. She can be just like me who is a bit boyish but still love being a girl. She should be soft but not that soft and she should be tough but not that tough. It is just my type! I don't do with top of bottom thingys. I have seen lesbians who hate men and can't differentiate between their sexuality and misandry. Some women acted like trophy wives and treated me like a man, expecting me to always console them when they sulk or want me to always buy things for her, but I never comply with their wishes because I am not the men they dated. I have never seen my type of woman so far. The women I have met were all toxic 😔
I worked with a guy and when his husband would call the store he would always be like. Hello is so and so there in a very deep voice and then once he realized it was me he would just go back to his normal voice,
They only studied "white" people to account for this in the first study. Though I wonder what that means, since that is still quite a broad term. In the other study where they morphed the faces, they don't mention it
Am I the only one finding this sort of research uncomfortable? Do we actually want technologies/systems to recognize our sexuality based on our features? This is frightening technologies in the wrong political climate.
I find human actual society unconfortable... researches are nothing to blame. In fact to censor/cancel/oppose a research because it could upset someone is a quite scarry prospective with a very similar attitude of the same people that could abuse it.
Asexual watches cat videos and calls everything “wholesome” and likes to tell everyone they’re asexual and usually autistic more then vegans or people who do CrossFit tell the world
@@tshowalter-rw5sn What they're asking for is not just your mere disagreement. WHY do you disagree? Your comments are just "no" and "they're all lies, stereotypes, not telling the truth". That just means you disagree, but no WHY. This is a science channel. Comments need more than mere opinion. (Original commenter could also point to studies if they have them, rather than just their opinions, too, but at least there is some specific claim to begin with)
That title plus thumbnail combo is hilarious! I wasn't gonna click, but I actively decided that it was so funny, ironic and creative that I had to click. Cudos! Now lets see how the video is, but I trust that it'll be amazing :)
This concept also appeared on an episode of the psychologically inspired show Lie to Me. They talked about how muscle tension could play a part. I wasn’t sure how much of that research was true though. TV mystery shows don’t seem to have a bibliography.
Lie to Me was mostly based on the extremely well debunked pseudoscience of facial lie detection. So i wouldn't take anything mentioned on there as credible
I’m concerned about how just about any company can use any data on the internet, like our dating profiles to train their models for any purpose they seem fit. This is a real privacy, safety and explicit consent problem.
This could be relevant; adopted children will still look more like their adoptive parents than other, equally unrelated random adults. Why? Because they learn how to emote from their parents, and they learn body language from their parents, and this determines to some extent which muscle groups get more exercise and, therefore, what parts of the face and body are more prominent. It strikes me as possible that the unconscious compulsion to perform one's identity, as learned from one's culture, can create physical similarities between people who share certain demographics.
I legit wouldn't have ever given this any thought but since you made a whole video about & im finding myself more and more convinced, i cant help but wonder... why?
I mean sexual attraction is most likely controlled by our DNA, we are born with it after all, so it would make sense that maybe different versions of genes that make you have a certain sexual orientation might also be capable of changing other things.
For me its not just facial structure, its the vibe, and expressions, and inflections in the voice, and behavioural traits which point towards gayness. I can also spot a closet as well, like three of my exes (yeah I collect them like people collect stamps lol)
Some are reasonably easy to recognise. For instance,here in the UK we have a TV presenter called Phillip Schofield...I could have told him 40 years ago and saved him a lot of bother.
What interests me is how one’s lifestyle molds one’s face. Your face could essentially be a representation of your lifestyle, what kind of a person you are etc. It’s no wonder it’s such an important mating criterion.
I would be fascinated to know how age affects the data. Is there a significant difference between someone in their 20s vs someone in their 50s? What about people who have faced a lot of discrimination vs people who have been generally more accepted? The way our life experience affects us physically is wild
Everything is genetic/biological - our differences extend beyond physical appearance into behavior inclinations/aversion/intelligence, etc. The sooner we recognize this the faster we can actually solve problems but people want to live in cope land where we are all equal and that something someone said or did is the real reason they aren’t successful or capable in certain fields or areas.
I heard of another study (possibly from this channel) that found autistic individuals are also more likely to have short noses. And yet a different study found a correlation with queerness and autism. Could it all be related?
There's also a big (anecdotal) correlation between autism, queerness, and hypermobility disorders. I've got all three! At risk of getting a bunch of terrible replies, I'm a transfeminine person and being on hormones made my connective tissue change and my joints loosen up even further. Could very easily play a part in cartilage formation and facial structure.
I had an IEEE published paper that explored the koinophilia experiment through the lens of computer vision algorithms. The experiment saw some faces rated very low on relative attractiveness when a set of generated faces were ranked from most to least attractive when the faces averaged facial features between male and female gendered faces. The averaged faces of a single gender consistently ranked higher on relative attractiveness.
that ai that can determine sexuality with 81% accuracy is terrifying, the potential for that to be misused is insane. interesting, but not worth looking into because of the risk
3:23 I don't really see the wide jaw, infact the straight jaw looks wider to me, but that night be due to the smile. The forehead doesn't look that different in size either, just the position of inner corners of the eyebrows looks different. Anyways, looks like I'm not the only sceptical one based on the comments. I mean I guess the AI might have guessed correctly, but how are they sure about what the AI picked up on (obviously I can find out by reading the study, if it's easily accessible). It can't be so simple that a woman with a wide jaw = lesbian, because that's not how the whole "on average" thing works (I mean my straight mom has a fairly wide jaw, which I inherited). Also missing bi people completely is a pretty big flaw imo.
Classic story about AI misalignment: some researchers thought they had trained an AI to recognize malignant skin cancers from regular skin spots. In reality, the AI had learned to recognize pictures with a ruler in it, because most pictures of confirmed skin cancers were taken with a size reference.
Useful for realistic game design though. If you can give the player a subconscious knowledge of character's identity without having to say it, it can remove the need for token characters or more obvious signs of sexuality.
I just commented as a straight person, I couldn't care less about this and I don't judge someone else's sexuality on their looks. This is literally never crossed my mind as a thing that existed.
@@SZvenM Because with today's generation being offended at everything almost, a straight guy asking this question, scientific and innocent as it may be in my opinion, would be considered insensitive and homophobic according to the other comments I got.
Why would a government outlaw something that is shown to have a genetic/hormonal component to it unless you think they're going to go on an extermination campaign.
Exactly.. phrenology has been disproven and isn’t scientific in basis. Remember that it led to people believing that people with closely set eyes were natural born liars and natural born killers. To this day movies cast actors according to that stereotype, examples being DeNero, Pacino, Woody Harrelson, Dolph Lundgren all of whom have narrowly set eyes. As a result many men including me are immediately viewed suspect by people upon first impression.
As a mostly face blind autistic person, who also identifies as not straight, this video was interesting and validating. I have spent a great portion of my life being able to tell peoples sexuality by looking at them without being able to remember who they are because (to me) they look the same as all the other people who have the same sexuality. 😂 I suspect this also explains why I "straight pass" so well.
"How can you say that with a straight face?"
🤣🤣
😅
😂😂😂😂
You just ruined that expression for me. I'll laugh next time I hear it. Thank you very much.
@@Terrato.Worzen What can I say except you're welcome?😂
You can usually tell by the way they kiss their boyfriends
Hey, now that you mention it...
@@SpoodyFlopp [cups hands around the sides of mouth] straaaaaiiight
😂
This got me real good.
Hilarious
This was the weirdest notification I've gotten in a while 💀❤️
Trust💀
Same
Yeah true
Same
Yes xactly!!
so basiclly regardless of gender, if your forehead is big, you're a boy kisser, and if it's smaller - girl kisser
Important clarification: regardless of gender, if your forehead is big, you're more likely to be a boy kisser, and if it's smaller - you're more likely to be a girl kisser
HELPPP
So that's why kpop boys style their hair down. To make their foreheads appear smaller. (And to hide the receding hairline)
Me, bisexual with an average forehead: makes sense
@@dawgggosaurYeah, I wonder where bisexuals fall on this spectrum?
"If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
- Ronald Coase
🎉
Seriously
yes....this was embarrassing kraap, says this PhD psychologist
To be fair, they make it fairly clear, that it's mostly just hypothesis with a few numbers sprinkled in.
THIS!
Do bisexual people have a different face on each side 🤔
Lol💀💀💀😅😅😅😅😅😅
Our faces constantly morph between two different faces, and then once we officially "choose a side" our faces do one final transformation at a side-choosing ceremony and we discover the true face that was inside us all along
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Good question
Harvey Dent is clearly bisexual!
I think "acting straight" has led a lot of people into acting.
*cough* Tom Cruise *cough*
@@gregbors8364 What?
@@1gorSouz4 (allegedly)
A lot of autistics too lol. Im learning a lot of my favorite actors and comedians and writers are coming out as autistic. But so am I lol
The Goddamned Batman, Kevin Conroy, as well.
that shimmer in our eyes gives away
I love this! Yet I thought it was due to having an Irish grandfather!
that‘s so funny! a friend of mine told me that she can usually tell by the eyes cause they‘ve got a certain „shimmer“ compared to straight guys lol
Yes finally someone has said it! They have this really strange glint in their eye, its kind of sleepily, emotive, I can't explain it but add it with the more animates facial movements, its all rather perculiar.
It's the glinting eye shadow, babes 👁👄👁
In portuguese we call that a "olhar açucarado" (sugary gaze)
Both you guys speak with wide eyes and raised eyebrows which is commonly associated with a female's facial expression. So, it's not your face per se, it's the expressions you cast.
And its all learned behavior from their mothers or other women they grew up with.
This doesn't work with a static image as in the test
@@alohaohana901 exactly
You didn't watch the video I guess. The studies used expressionless photos.
Yall need help. Seriously.
Hmmm, I feel simultaneously like this totally might be a thing, but at the same time, feel like there is a huge chance there is just some reaaaaally subtle bias here in some way. Like, there's a lot of behavioral things that can affect face pics even if you remove makeup and hair and the like, and it's just really hard to control for that. But hey, I haven't read the research, so idk lol.
they've controlled for that by using templates with blank expressions and etc.
at least re: the external perception part. i do agree that expression/behavioral things are definitely a factor in real life, but I do also think this is a thing to a certain extent
You’re totally right! …. You haven’t read the research and should be quiet
I want to see a study comparing the facial structure of men/women who prefer chocolate ice cream vs. vanilla ice cream. I’ll even make a bet that some level of discernible difference might be discovered.
Nice idea?
Edit : thanks (3) 👍
i wouldn't be at all surprised. It's amazing what correlations you can find if you look hard enough
@@WhichDoctor1 Agreed. But these are not simply correlations here. The researchers in at least two of the articles I've read so far (sources in the vid description) conducted actual experiments with true independent variables and control conditions/groups. The effect sizes were strong and statistically significant. These studies appear in respected scientific journals with high impact factors
Soy una persona indecisa en ese tema. También quisiera saber qué hay conmigo
As a Neapolitan licker and lover, I feel highly offended by your vanilla/chocolate bias.
It’s about time we really look at the science
In this case, the science is looking back at us
No this is All lies and very wrong
@@tshowalter-rw5snokay, prove it
@@tshowalter-rw5snWhat makes it lies?
@@Meccarox
I wonder the same thing as you. What are the specific "lies and very wrong".
I hate it when people bring a strong opinion into their comments without elaborating.
This is a science channel.
We're only interested if they have more than only essentially "no, disagree" as a comment.
Specific claims and specific counters? I'd like to read it.
I feel like maybe we should be more scared of this than impressed tbh
I agree, especially with the rise of ai this could potentially go horribly wrong in some countries where homophobia is a big thing..
You’re ridiculous for thinking this anything new, or a new idea, or that data and inquires haven’t been collected on this for over a century. There’s nothing definitive to work with much less weaponize; what you should be concerned with is if it’s ever discovered to be a gene, as gene manipulation is going to become very prevalent over the coming decades.
It is terrifying to think what the prejudiced individuals in power would do with this data.
they would mind their business instead of wasting time
Putin has already been using it for years.
in america they would do nothing but if you have a corrupt leader idk
Lol u guys recognize the people in power are rather on the opposite political spectrum right?
@@neinbruderja7519 That depends on where you live and for anyone likely to be watching this video it also tends to change regularly.
0:17 those haircuts gave you away
😅😅😅😂😂😂😅😅😅
hjo hjo hjo hjo
Even as a lesbian, I really got a bad gaydar. I can't tell someone's sexuality just by looking at them. Most of the time, I know someone's sexuality because I talked with them and become friends but even so I am not interested in most lesbians unless they are my type of woman with my criteria.
What is your type of women?
@@Δ-Δ-Δ-Δ Hopefully ones with a good gaydar.
I don't think you can really tell someone's sexuality by looking at them lol
@@Δ-Δ-Δ-Δ the one who is strong, respectful and loyal. I am so picky. lol. I want someone who is really good at their job and also good at housework. I don't want someone who give away all their femininity for the sake of looking butch or whatever. She can be just like me who is a bit boyish but still love being a girl. She should be soft but not that soft and she should be tough but not that tough. It is just my type! I don't do with top of bottom thingys. I have seen lesbians who hate men and can't differentiate between their sexuality and misandry. Some women acted like trophy wives and treated me like a man, expecting me to always console them when they sulk or want me to always buy things for her, but I never comply with their wishes because I am not the men they dated. I have never seen my type of woman so far. The women I have met were all toxic 😔
@@mariatrinitymya8618do you live in the us?
No, just the voice more than anything 😂
yeah
ikr!
I worked with a guy and when his husband would call the store he would always be like. Hello is so and so there in a very deep voice and then once he realized it was me he would just go back to his normal voice,
That's hilarious!
they already have a video on that lol
But did these studies account for different ethnitcities? 🤔
Go check the research papers
They only studied "white" people to account for this in the first study. Though I wonder what that means, since that is still quite a broad term. In the other study where they morphed the faces, they don't mention it
@@thekaxmaxwhy check can one can get human replies in a matter of an instant? This is an informal platform, not an academic one.
@@chrisjackson8151 because checking is faster. Did you see any instant replies confirming? No.
@@7792pnaurfrwait you ate
Also they didnt even get an answer yet so yeah
Am I the only one finding this sort of research uncomfortable? Do we actually want technologies/systems to recognize our sexuality based on our features? This is frightening technologies in the wrong political climate.
Not a new thing. The most obvious example is phrenology, but basically all sorts of profiling are both unreliable and abused.
@@Normalizee Not just political but social climate, as well.
I find human actual society unconfortable... researches are nothing to blame.
In fact to censor/cancel/oppose a research because it could upset someone is a quite scarry prospective with a very similar attitude of the same people that could abuse it.
@@BresciGaetano This literally has no positive applications
@@OatmealTheCrazy and so? the reality around us does not exist in order to be usefull for mankind.
*Asexual has left the chat
Do you even have a forehead?!?? :D
@@HKragh lol, no🤣😹🤣😹 (yes😀)
Asexual watches cat videos and calls everything “wholesome” and likes to tell everyone they’re asexual and usually autistic more then vegans or people who do CrossFit tell the world
I've never thought of it coming from the face, but instead the voice, and sometimes the walk and it's not a 100% accuracy either
It's a combination of all. It's not 100% accurate either, but it is surprisingly so.
It's the use of facial expression, eyebrow movement, headshaking etc
this is such an interesting concept that honestly makes so much sense
They didn’t really cover properly as to why.
No, this doesn't make sense.
None of this doesn't make sense at *_all._*
@@S-CB-SL-Animations how so?
@@HamishChalk probably because no one knows why. It's just a correlation that's been noticed
For years I've been following this channel and it was today when I found that Gregory & Mitchell are a couple.
@vvalkanov. What happened? Were you decapitated?
How did you find out?
They did a video a while back about their compatibility as a couple based on blood type or genetics or something, just for fun lol
"Wait, THEY ARE COUPLES?"
"Always have been"
2:09 bro's foreheard got excited🗿
That's wild😭
2:35 Semi related to that. In my personal experience, the more racist/prejudice people were, the less likely they could guess my heritage
How many people are you asking to guess your heritage? 😂
the expressions give it away easily too.
No
@@tshowalter-rw5sn Gonna need more from you than a "No", buddy.
@@DrTssha what he's saying is all lies he's just being a stereotype and not telling the truth
@@tshowalter-rw5snyes
@@tshowalter-rw5sn
What they're asking for is not just your mere disagreement.
WHY do you disagree? Your comments are just "no" and "they're all lies, stereotypes, not telling the truth".
That just means you disagree, but no WHY.
This is a science channel. Comments need more than mere opinion.
(Original commenter could also point to studies if they have them, rather than just their opinions, too, but at least there is some specific claim to begin with)
That title plus thumbnail combo is hilarious! I wasn't gonna click, but I actively decided that it was so funny, ironic and creative that I had to click. Cudos! Now lets see how the video is, but I trust that it'll be amazing :)
This concept also appeared on an episode of the psychologically inspired show Lie to Me. They talked about how muscle tension could play a part. I wasn’t sure how much of that research was true though. TV mystery shows don’t seem to have a bibliography.
Lie to Me was mostly based on the extremely well debunked pseudoscience of facial lie detection. So i wouldn't take anything mentioned on there as credible
this research could be incredibly dangerous. like why are we making phrenology eugenics machines?💀
Haha, my face is incognito, bi cloaking device
am I allowed to... comment on how adorable ya'll are in the YT profile pic! Just refreshing to see you two so comfortable, chilling there!
I’m concerned about how just about any company can use any data on the internet, like our dating profiles to train their models for any purpose they seem fit. This is a real privacy, safety and explicit consent problem.
Its all in the eyes & facial expressions.
What do eyes have to do with it?
@@HappySmilingDog-d7u Not a thing.
@@HappySmilingDog-d7u The eyes tell you alot about about a person &
@@NikkiiPope not much of an eye reader sorry
No not true
This could be relevant; adopted children will still look more like their adoptive parents than other, equally unrelated random adults. Why? Because they learn how to emote from their parents, and they learn body language from their parents, and this determines to some extent which muscle groups get more exercise and, therefore, what parts of the face and body are more prominent. It strikes me as possible that the unconscious compulsion to perform one's identity, as learned from one's culture, can create physical similarities between people who share certain demographics.
I legit wouldn't have ever given this any thought but since you made a whole video about & im finding myself more and more convinced, i cant help but wonder... why?
I mean sexual attraction is most likely controlled by our DNA, we are born with it after all, so it would make sense that maybe different versions of genes that make you have a certain sexual orientation might also be capable of changing other things.
From atom😅
Well, no. Sexuality seems to be defined during the development of the embryo, it isn't genetic. They mention that in the video.
As a woman with ADHD, and my sexuality is everyone. I'm really good at identifying people's sexualities.
Now I see why I’ve had people think I’m a lesbian.
For me its not just facial structure, its the vibe, and expressions, and inflections in the voice, and behavioural traits which point towards gayness.
I can also spot a closet as well, like three of my exes (yeah I collect them like people collect stamps lol)
You didn't spot them soon enough if they were with you long enough to become "exes", LOL!
@@someguy7805 You're assuming the gender of their exes
@@OatmealTheCrazy
Their "genders" are irrelevant, given the content of my statement.
@@OatmealTheCrazy lol WHERE
Some are reasonably easy to recognise.
For instance,here in the UK we have a TV presenter called Phillip Schofield...I could have told him 40 years ago and saved him a lot of bother.
Using an AI system by feeding it images from dating app seems to be a good way to bias a lot of parameters.
Oh Man the title for the video had me cracking up 😂 you guys are so hott and I love yall ❤ please make content forever 😘
I think this needed a lot more discussion on ethics.
Ethics is a whole other subject.😉
👆 science 💪
What interests me is how one’s lifestyle molds one’s face. Your face could essentially be a representation of your lifestyle, what kind of a person you are etc. It’s no wonder it’s such an important mating criterion.
I would be fascinated to know how age affects the data. Is there a significant difference between someone in their 20s vs someone in their 50s? What about people who have faced a lot of discrimination vs people who have been generally more accepted? The way our life experience affects us physically is wild
What about us bisexuals 💀
There’s only 2 genders
yeah they forgot bisexuals like middle children.
In future, we'll be determining which camp you fall into based on forehead size.
I feel like us bis are being constantly left out of studies
I have an issue with that : on one hand - it makes sense, on the other - why cant you chose xd
It's the expressions in the face that give it away.
I can't tell based on face, it's the mannerisms
I find it hard to believe that this is purely scientific.
It most likely isnt.
It’s meant to be taken with a grain of salt
This research is going to be VERY useful starting next year!
This has been a great series 👍
the sequel we didn’t need, but wanted
I thought you were talking of eugenics but I agree
Love how this is more (indirect) evidence that gayness has genetic/epigenetic roots
Had the exact same thought.
INTRESTING…..
Some of it. Which is unsurprising; having sexuality at all does as well.
Everything is genetic/biological - our differences extend beyond physical appearance into behavior inclinations/aversion/intelligence, etc.
The sooner we recognize this the faster we can actually solve problems but people want to live in cope land where we are all equal and that something someone said or did is the real reason they aren’t successful or capable in certain fields or areas.
You can't blame it all on genetics. Humans are not determined by genes alone. That would be too simple.
I heard of another study (possibly from this channel) that found autistic individuals are also more likely to have short noses.
And yet a different study found a correlation with queerness and autism.
Could it all be related?
There's also a big (anecdotal) correlation between autism, queerness, and hypermobility disorders. I've got all three! At risk of getting a bunch of terrible replies, I'm a transfeminine person and being on hormones made my connective tissue change and my joints loosen up even further. Could very easily play a part in cartilage formation and facial structure.
My favorite scientist asking the real questions I never even asked
"The eyes chico, they never lie"
Very skeptical of AI stripping away a beard, how would it know what someone looks like without a beard? Humans can't even do that.
it's speech patterns and mannerisms for me, and if you still can't tell, ask them about themselves. Music taste is a big one
I’m going to have to see a bunch of the these studies replicated before I take any of this as fact.
I had an IEEE published paper that explored the koinophilia experiment through the lens of computer vision algorithms. The experiment saw some faces rated very low on relative attractiveness when a set of generated faces were ranked from most to least attractive when the faces averaged facial features between male and female gendered faces. The averaged faces of a single gender consistently ranked higher on relative attractiveness.
that ai that can determine sexuality with 81% accuracy is terrifying, the potential for that to be misused is insane. interesting, but not worth looking into because of the risk
Knowing anything about another person with the help of technology 👁️
That AI ability is scary open to abuse.
Indeed!
Well, maybe by then we will have stopped hiding. Then it's fine to know for AI.
@@charlesmendeley9823 lets hope! 🙏
It's really interesting that you do this videos...
Wow! This is incredibly fascinating!
You're the best science channel out there. Love your sense of humour and information you provide.
He lied
There is things that are better to keep as mystery...
Now I can't stop looking at my face
You said that, what about bisexual people?The relation between the spectrum of facial and sexual gayness wouldn’t be more interesting though?
I think it might have something to do with the muscles people tend to use to express themselves that might affect how people grow into themselves!
Thanks guys. Great research into a potential mine field topic. The More You Know!
I love the style of this Video:) funny but also rational and respectful. Thank you!
Yes. They have a face
No not true
not for long..
They also have a head, arms, legs, and a torso
stop making broad assumptions about people
how are you so sure about that 🙄
3:23 I don't really see the wide jaw, infact the straight jaw looks wider to me, but that night be due to the smile. The forehead doesn't look that different in size either, just the position of inner corners of the eyebrows looks different.
Anyways, looks like I'm not the only sceptical one based on the comments. I mean I guess the AI might have guessed correctly, but how are they sure about what the AI picked up on (obviously I can find out by reading the study, if it's easily accessible). It can't be so simple that a woman with a wide jaw = lesbian, because that's not how the whole "on average" thing works (I mean my straight mom has a fairly wide jaw, which I inherited). Also missing bi people completely is a pretty big flaw imo.
Classic story about AI misalignment: some researchers thought they had trained an AI to recognize malignant skin cancers from regular skin spots. In reality, the AI had learned to recognize pictures with a ruler in it, because most pictures of confirmed skin cancers were taken with a size reference.
By the way you describe the tested traits, it sounds like these studies could very well be subject to p-hacking.
Check the papers and see if you can p-hack them
ASAP science answering the real questions 😂
Higher foreheads and shorter noses? You mean like people in Finland?
congrats guys you reinvented phrenology
Honestly the AI research is kinda terrifying. Perhaps I should start wearing a hockey mask or something.
It is indeed, now imagine what a human is capable of, even if it is unconsciously
Useful for realistic game design though. If you can give the player a subconscious knowledge of character's identity without having to say it, it can remove the need for token characters or more obvious signs of sexuality.
1:40 hm... So the gayest face would be like andrew tate?
BINGO
I literally just found this channel and it is EVERYTHING! Even as a straight male, it's still amazing❤❤❤❤
So, the closer to Megamind, the closer to Elton John?
This is now the GaySap Science Channel 🤩
I spit my drink out , I’m not finished watching but I just wanna say cheers to the creator 🤣🤣🤣
They both creators no?
No
it's more facial movement imo, also voice and arm/leg movement
This is, as with AI, both amazing and terrifying at the same time.
I think the dating site composites might also be skewed slightly by the subtle differences in intercommunal beauty standards.
Thanks for asking the questions the hetero society is too scared to ask.
I just commented as a straight person, I couldn't care less about this and I don't judge someone else's sexuality on their looks. This is literally never crossed my mind as a thing that existed.
@@applegal3058 It's not about conscious evaluation, but more so implicit biases and labels.
simply no one cared.
Why would anyone be scared to ask this?
@@SZvenM Because with today's generation being offended at everything almost, a straight guy asking this question, scientific and innocent as it may be in my opinion, would be considered insensitive and homophobic according to the other comments I got.
This was actually pretty funny can’t lie 😂
3:05 imagine if a government that outlawed homosexuality had access to this technology and data base 😅
oh fawk just finished the video ty for covering this point :)
Why would a government outlaw something that is shown to have a genetic/hormonal component to it unless you think they're going to go on an extermination campaign.
@@imzjustplayin Broski, there are places outside America.
Don't give them ideas...
What a great video - I never knew !
Asexuals pulling up to the study without having a face at all: 🤯🤯🤯
HELP THIS IS ACTUALLY FUNNY
Gray-aces pulling up with the faint outline of a face
This would have eliminated the need for the military’s “Why Ask? Can’t You Tell?” policy
But what about bisexuals?
As much as I agree this could reinforce harmful stereotypes... it's still kinda fascinating though. It could also lead to more understanding.
Double checked the notification..lol
This is surprising!
The linear regression method is so cool!
No it all fails
@@tshowalter-rw5sn why are replying to everyone 😭
@@EngiTeF2-ed7li because you're believing this guy's bull crap
This is getting dangerously close to phrenology...
It's not made up, it's from studies. So, very different.
The tools is usually never the problem with science, it is the researchers mostly.
its trends not one reason is the fact of all
also this uses real data not people bsing
If you think that, then you completely missed the point of the video
Exactly.. phrenology has been disproven and isn’t scientific in basis. Remember that it led to people believing that people with closely set eyes were natural born liars and natural born killers. To this day movies cast actors according to that stereotype, examples being DeNero, Pacino, Woody Harrelson, Dolph Lundgren all of whom have narrowly set eyes. As a result many men including me are immediately viewed suspect by people upon first impression.
As a mostly face blind autistic person, who also identifies as not straight, this video was interesting and validating. I have spent a great portion of my life being able to tell peoples sexuality by looking at them without being able to remember who they are because (to me) they look the same as all the other people who have the same sexuality. 😂
I suspect this also explains why I "straight pass" so well.
I read the title and felt attacked lol I’m straight I swear guys 😂
Wild title 😭