The incessant production of the symbolic seems to be centred in the crosshairs of recently popularised forms of meditation (like body scans, breath work and mindful breathing/listening/eating etc..) Is it naive to see these practices as an attempt to quell or temporarily pacify the death drive by reprioritising the phenomenological and more vital forms of living? If not, do you think they stand a chance? Also, thanks so much for the staggering amount of educational content, I’m really quite grateful!
I think that's an interesting observation. My answer is, possibly. But bear one possibility in mind, those contemplative practices can themselves be subject to a habit forming repetition.
I agree that the signifier splits Lacan apart from a certain kind of phenomenology, based on a ‘pure’ or ‘immediate’ or even ‘authentic’ relation of bodies directly to bodies, but on another level you could say that ‘phenomeno-logy’ - the overwriting of the phenomenal world by logos, by the word - stands precisely for the challenge lacan makes to this naive view
Thank you for this very stimulating lecture. I was thinking about the ubiquity of the symbolic order you mentioned. My two cents are as follows: If there's any way in which we can have "direct access" to the world independent of the symbol, it would have to be my means of mindfulness meditation. Successfully done, there are no symbols present within the field of consciousness.
Thanks for this, love your point about a greater power of negation. Your videos and your writing are valued resources.
Thanks for this great Educational content. Keep on going. ✌️✌️✌️
Thanks! Great examples and performance of theory!
The incessant production of the symbolic seems to be centred in the crosshairs of recently popularised forms of meditation (like body scans, breath work and mindful breathing/listening/eating etc..) Is it naive to see these practices as an attempt to quell or temporarily pacify the death drive by reprioritising the phenomenological and more vital forms of living? If not, do you think they stand a chance?
Also, thanks so much for the staggering amount of educational content, I’m really quite grateful!
I think that's an interesting observation. My answer is, possibly. But bear one possibility in mind, those contemplative practices can themselves be subject to a habit forming repetition.
Great lecture
excellent video very helpful
I’m having trouble understanding where repetition comes in
Thank you for this!!!
Outstanding!
Words will not replace us! Words will not replace us!
I agree that the signifier splits Lacan apart from a certain kind of phenomenology, based on a ‘pure’ or ‘immediate’ or even ‘authentic’ relation of bodies directly to bodies, but on another level you could say that ‘phenomeno-logy’ - the overwriting of the phenomenal world by logos, by the word - stands precisely for the challenge lacan makes to this naive view
Thank you for this very stimulating lecture. I was thinking about the ubiquity of the symbolic order you mentioned. My two cents are as follows: If there's any way in which we can have "direct access" to the world independent of the symbol, it would have to be my means of mindfulness meditation. Successfully done, there are no symbols present within the field of consciousness.