Byron Janis - Rachmaninoff concerto No.1

Byron Janis and Moscow Philharmonic Orchestra (Kyril Kondrashin, conductor) perform Rachmaninoff piano concerto No.1
1. Vivace
2. Andante
3. Allegro vivace
Recorded by Mercury on location in Moscow in 1962.
______________________________________________________
_______________________________________­­­________
(c) COPYRIGHT Disclaimer, Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

[@barney6888]

Kondrashin is one of my absolute favourite conductors. he brings out the best in this work. Janis is great, as always.

[@IanSutton-gl1fi]

This a great recording by a wonderful artist who died in March of 2024 at age 95. Byron Janis suffered extremely painful arthritis in this wrists and fingers throughout much of his career, but play on regardless. He had studied very early with Vladimir Horowitz. He made great recordings as well of the Rachmaninoff Paganini Rhapsody and the composer's 3rd Concerto, and many others. He is sadly missed.

[@strad1704]

thank you for the sensitive words! Since the sixties I collected all his records and despite many brilliant pianists from 1910 to the present, for me he stands out above most, apart from perfect technique, with sensitivity and faithfulness to the work without pretentious virtuosity, just like Gary Graffman, who studied with him for some time under Horowitz.

[@ADGO]

This is the recording I always return to.

[@bondjames417]

最高です😊😊😊

[@KaisarAnvar]

He really paved the way for the contemporary pianists on how to perform Rachmaninoff concertos. What a legend. I was very sad to hear about the injury and the finger condition he had. Yet, with that minor disability, he performed as if he never had to deal with any physical condition.

[@789armstrong]

I bought the DVD but it was so depressing I eventually threw it out.

[@micaelabonetti949]

Stellare! Sensazionale!

[@snaaptaker]

My all-time favorite recording of Rach1. IMO, there is none better. Thanks much. ☺

[@Bikerdave87]

thanks

[@yowzephyr]

How can I tell if I'm listening to the 1917 revised Rachmaninoff piano concerto #1? What is the first indicator?

[@RaineriHakkarainen]

Mikhail Pletnev The King Rachmaninov piano concerto no 1! The greatest pianists of All Time Are really Artur Rubinstein ( The God) Grigory Sokolov ( The Titan The Giant of The piano) Emil Gilels ( The King) Wilhelm Kempff Maurizio Pollini Vladimir Ashkenazy Alexei Lubimov Stanislav Igolinsky ( better than Lipatti) Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Maria Grinberg Natalia Trull Radu Lupu Mikhail Pletnev

[@chrisreinhart6421]

Ashkenazy does this piece better than anyone.

[@AndSendMe]

@@chrisreinhart6421 There is not a single performance by Ashkenazy of Rachmaninoff, either as pianist or conductor, that I find preferable to all others.

[@robertoquijada6736]

Éternal, is the Triangle, One Writes Music, One Plays Music, and All Listen to the Music.The Muses in Action. All are Edificated. Grace in the Universe is, the Eternal.

[@TJFNYC212]

One of the 1st classical LPs I owned

[@ziegunerweiser]

This is what put him in the hall of fame forever

[@pianostardust]

Brilliant! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[@elbestione7010]

11:16 le générique de Apostrophes (Antenne 2, France)

[@rudigersaul9943]

Not only 'very good' dear
Mr. Winterflood.....it's
exciting....stunning....
amazing -the cooperation
with KONDRASHIN....
heute kommt da nur
ZIMERMAN/OZAWA ran!
GARIBALD MYERS/
OTTAWA

[@789armstrong]

Probably the greatest Rach 1 ever. Even more feeling and expression than his recording with Reiner.

[@miguelkhalil5226]

💎

[@chloefu5475]

mvt 1 0:04 (I agree with yowzephyr that it's a good place to start)
mvt 2 12:04
mvt 3 17:42

[@Bikerdave87]

very good

[@yowzephyr]

0:04 is a good place to start.

[@horatiodreamt]

Horowitz on Byron Janis: His octaves are faster than mine! (per Adele Marcus)

[@Andrea-hm1ix]

is not so important to be the fastest in octaves.
To be a great octavian is not means to be a Cesare.

[@musicmasterplayer4532]

Actually, per Horowitz himself, Ronald Turini, another student of Horowitz, had the "best" double runs of anyone.

[@chloefu5475]

16:28 & 15:01

[@StephaneMeyrat]

I prefer the interpretation of Hungarian pianist Tamas Vasari, just a bit slower and more into the essence of this wonderful concerto.

[@chrisreinhart6421]

I see massive praise for this interpretation on here but it's just ok. Am I missing something? It's a bit too fast throughout. And where is the slow buildup in movement 2 to the big sweeping payoff? if you want to know what I'm talking about look up Ashkenazy and Previn's interpretation. I think that's the gold standard.

[@789armstrong]

If you dont like Janis then you will not appreciate Rachmaninoffs performance either. Janis models his interpretation after the composers recording. I love Ashkenazy/Previn on the Rach 4 even more than Michelangeli, but here Janis, Pletnev and Valentina Lisitsa are comparable to Rachmaninoff himself.

[@byronjanislover]

@Chris Reinhart. Yes, you are missing something

[@Andrea-hm1ix]

@@789armstrong you lost with Valentina Lisitsa.

[@Andrea-hm1ix]

Sound is good, but the interpretation is so empty. Is terrible. What was the problem of this man?
Maybe someone should to listen:
Pletnev
Laura De Fusco
Lyudmila Sosina