The Deadly Evolution of Anti-Tank Warfare | Weapons That Changed The World | War Stories
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 май 2024
- Uncover into the impact of anti-tank weaponry, from the legendary RPG to modern marvels like the AT4 and FIM-92 Stinger. Join Wil Willis, a former Army Ranger, as he explores the evolution of these lethal tools and their profound influence on warfare. From World War II to present-day conflicts, witness how these shoulder-mounted rockets have reshaped military strategy and continue to pose a threat to even the most advanced armor.
00:00 Intro
03:10 AT4
10:20 Carl Gustaf Recoilless Rifle
15:45 Bazooka
22:00 Panzerschreck
23:45 Panzerfaust
27:15 RPG
31:45 M72 LAW
33:45 SMAW
36:45 FIM-92 Stinger
42:00 Testing Different Rockets
War Stories is your one stop shop for all things military history. From Waterloo to Verdun, we'll be bringing you only the best documentaries and stories from history's most engaging and dramatic conflicts.
Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'WARSTORIES': historyhit.com/subscription
You can find more from us on:
/ warstoriesdocs
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. For any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
#warstories #documentary #military
I love that in these military-driven shows, the hosts always have the most American names.
Will Willis, Jon Johnson, Neal Powers, Max Hollywood, Chuck Stone, etc.
They are never called "Reinaldo Rodriguez Hernandez", for whatever reason.
lmao!!!
Hb Richard “Mack” Machowicz?
Homer Simpson got his alternative name Max Power off a hair dryer.
Brandon Herrera Trumps all the pogues you named.
I'm waiting to see an American with the name 'Bilge Hauler'.
taking out the shipping container is a very good indication of what the swedish next-gen weapon would do to a technical
Whisky whisky whisky will willis is BACK! Love that dude!
The stinger is not an Anti-Tank Weapon, it’s a MANPADS
I personally would take the Carl Gustaf over the AT-4. I want to reload my rockets
What about the Mk 153 SMAW? That one's reloadable right?
I'm fairly sure the Australian name for it - "Charlie Gutsache" - some of that comes from who has to carry it...
I’m going with the Carl Gustav
Yeah i think its an all together suspicious design. Its like those Russian soldiers at Stalingrad being handed a riffle and no ammo and when they asked what to do when they ran out, they told them not to worry about it. Then they see the next guy in line being handed just a magazine...
Definitely.
A shaped charge forms a plastic deformation of the cone which happens so fast it never melts until after impact. Swedish Disarmament Commision back in the late 1960's published X-ray images of the formation of the jet at 1/40,000 of second intervals across an airgap then penetrating thick armor. I found printed film copies of the images in the Mid-seventies at the Federal depository at the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle Library.
jeez, you don't wanna mess with the sweeds, they got some impressive firepower stocked up there
the Singapore armed forces infantry units have been using CG84RR since the mid 1980s. - its not new technology - except for the laser sights and improved munitions
@@rayzor8268 okay, I wasn’t talking about the Singapore armed forces, but good for them I guess. Lol What is it with country’s that have nice people living in there like Sweden and Singapore having such huge firepower?
@@csschotinside every nice and polite, and a little bit naive Swede, there is a slumbering bloodthirsty Viking trying to get out 😉🇸🇪✌️
There's literally nothing special outside of being able to produce them locally instead of importing
@@AHappyCub OK, glad there part of NATO anyways
Skipped over was a weapon I carried in '85. I lugged around the 90mm M67 recoiless rifle. Unfortunately, I only fired the .308 round using an adapter.
What a travesty...
How heavy was it ? Lord have mercy
@@mr.purtee 44 lbs.
@@kskeel1124 I agree!
I did my service 90-91....ATGW unit armed with the first batch of the Swedish BILL.
We rode the BV-206 up in the Arctic, beautiful vehicle, absolutely amazing to move around in.
In our squad as support weapons we had a medium MG, ksp 58....and a Carl Gustaf.....plus the BILL system AND our personal weapons....
Yeah i can relate to carry that steel pipe around, brother😂👍
Cheers. I remain a fan of the Carl Gustav Recoilless Rifle. Cheers
Did everyone see a recent Ballistic High-Speed video with an RPG?
Dam bro, he just get blown out by malfunction and survived 💀
@@justrandompeople2157 He talks about it on the Unsubscribe Podcast episode 136 somewhere on RUclips. It's amazing that he's still around. Kentucky Ballistics guy too. Phew.
@@m1t2a1 just be careful if you have ballistic in your RUclips name, we never know what gonna happen with that 💀
@@justrandompeople2157 😆😂
They always show a SMAW when talking about backblast but then show an AT4. Also, the hidden firing button on the Panzerfaust wasn't noticable at all..
the production budget on this video couldn't cover the cost of a decent sandwich
AT-4 has special models that you can safely fire out of confined spaces...
@@kskeel1124 Im aware of that, but the whole section they were talking about the AT4 they kept showing the SMAW. Im all about the backblast area, I was a SMAW gunner from 94-98.
The rocket sure seemed inert too. I think they had a charge rigged on the tower.
@@AlexLee-dc2vb at4-q is the basic nom for the close quarters. Very cool to see another person mention this.
the edited muzzle flash and explosions are PAINFULLY cringe
You probably watched the first 5 minutes and quiet and miss all the real slo mo explosions of the test firing.
Always skip the first 5 and last minutes of a RUclips video, it's either spoilers or plugs.
I first thought that as well, but then I remembered the incident with the RUclips channel Ballistic High Speed where the RPG exploded in his hands while he was attempting to fire.
RPGs are no joke. These weapons are as dangerous to its users as it is to its targets.
A very good demo video.
You could have mentioned the Boys anti-tank rifle, in use before the bazooka, and the PIAT.
Just love the Swedish weapons and in particular the 40mm Bofors that we had on our ships during WWII. The technology back then was amazing for the time. I believe there was the Oerlikon 20mm and the Hispano-Suiza 20. AAA was so critical, especially in the Pacific. The development of weapons was so fast and mind boggling. I believe the Panzerschrek was better than the Bazooka. The modern battlefield is extremely dangerous. With micro drones acting as spotters, it is unlimited what could be accomplished today. I believe that technology is going to have to lean towards Cloaking or Thermal Camo. Whoever can make a soldier and/or equipment invisible will control the battle space. Air Power is still supreme and I'm glad that we have not neglected that.
The Contraves-Oerlikon sam of the late 50s was very succesful too.
What does STINGER have to deal with anti-tank warfare ?!
Emang Koplak bro 😂😂😂😂😂
Yasalam
This show was my childhood
I wouldn't use the M72 LAW. I'd want something that can be reloaded and re used. During the Vietnam war, I heard that the Vietcong used discarded LAW tubes for booby traps, fill them with several Grenades.
Our drill sergeants told us the same thing. They said to always make sure to destroy the launch tube after firing to prevent the enemy from using it.
great show. brings back a lot of fond and not so fond memories
I fired the LAW (light anti-tank weapon) many times in my training in the army. I carried one in VN but never had the chance to use it. It was mostly used against bunkers and was an effective disposable weapon. You could hit a APC size target at 100-150 yards consistently. We would carry (one per soldier) a total of two in each squad.
Awesome
8:18 HOLY SMOKES I was not ready for that lmao
It is a very wonderful documentary. amazing..full of accurate information. He deserves great admiration and praise. I salute you with all the beautiful words and sincere feelings for your sincere efforts in producing this distinguished and wonderful work. I wish you lasting success and all goodness and happiness. You are the best in the best. I have the utmost respect, pride, and appreciation.
Some people in Finland live in fear that Russia would invade us. Now in NATO, the risk has declined, at least on my opinition. Finland have had similar heavy bazookas for years but re-chargable. Lighter single-use unti-tank "kerta-sinko" as well. But this Swedish engineered prodigy weapon looks amazing.
I remember reading of a 1980s W.German-made rpg launcher also named Panzerfaust. It looks like an RPG-7, but shorter
& handier, with a round that reminds of the ww2 British PIAT.
Do you have any information
on it ?
Thank you.
The now incredibly old 95 S 58-61 and far newer French single-use RAC 112 APILAS which gives you a concussion when you fire it. The light single-use one you talk about is the M72 LAW mentioned in the video, Finns just have their own name for it. Same with NLAW, TOW and Spike: Finns just have different names for them.
A) First antitank weapon was german Tankgewehr of wwl B) Panzerschreck warhead was constructed as improvement of unsuccessfull rocket launcher Puppchen. C) First AA rocket manpad was unsuccessfull german Fliegerfaust of wwll.
The AT-4 does not compete against the RPG - 2 or RPG -7, it does however compete with later disposable RPGs like the 18, 22 and 26
How have RPGS been used for the last thousand years?
rockets
I like your documentary.to the point
Every time I see this episode it reminds me that TV experts are not... I'm a bazooka expert, but I have the screen installed backwards... 17:30 and then they fake fire it.
so many goodies!!!
In a way I'm glad to see the Stinger take a bit of skill. Bad guys won't have the necessary training if they get ahold of them.
I Also Like The CARL GUSTAV...
Unless you have to carry it…
@@bob_the_bomb4508 If you carry it on your back especially if you have backpack its not the worst. Biggest problem with it when you have to make quick manuevers especially in forests. No matter how good is your physique, you will get gassed.
@@cr0wN_ when defining the word ‘ergonomic’ all you have to say is “opposite of the Charlie G…” :)
Ooh,I want one!
Classic!
Reload ability is a plus.
the "bazzoka scarface al pacino" with guided bullets!
TOW2A/B my weapon of choice! 0352! SEMPER FI!
No mention of U.S. Bazooka which was before rpg.
Hope I'm never on the receiving end of any of those munitions. The Gustav and AT4 are devastating
does sweden still make the best?
in 1963 in the Marines got to fire one round with the 3.5 launcher. Awsome also!
'Check the backblast area'.
Me, a Brit: laughs in PIAT.
Swedish Anti Tank Weapon AT4 is also supply and used by the Ukrainian Army against the Russia Tanks, IFVs and APCs
Sweden has donated 20.000 AT4 to Ukraine 👍🏻
Imitation is the greatest form of flattery. All weapons after the bazooka are simply improving on a great weapon.
the largest setback for me with the AT4 is that, it is a fire-and-forget system. If you miss, you ducked up. Also, something like an RPG rocket is smaller/lighter. You can have a man carry 6-8 or 16 rockets for it, but try to do it with an AT4 or a Javelin. If they could find a way to make it reloadable, it would be far superior to anything else-based on the firepower, adaptability, and other features (like top attack mode, delays, infrared or thermal optics, maybe target locking/homing)
31:19 XD
Just the comment im looking for
Love it ❤
Simple, effective ... perfect for all soviet armored vehicles.
You forgot antitank rifles and PIAT antitank weapons.
The bt earpiece at 22:09 was historically accurate just FYI.... Lol
i think i saw this on T.V. 10+ years ago, funny to come across it now
16 minutes in ww 1 & ww 2, finally
I served for 27+years in the US Army most in the reserves as a 19D4H teaching recruits how to kill Russian armor. From Entac Dragon Law to Improved TOW Vehicles M901 with Twin launchers and thermal and day sights. AT-4/M136 and Javelin as it was being introduce just before I retired in December 1998. I had a marine friend who did 3 tours in Nam running the M40 106 mm RR mounted on a Mule. With Heat, HEP and APERS rounds a real threat to infantry and armor.
Why were the shipping container doors removed ? it would have been cool to see the damage with them left on not cut near the hinges .
These comments! People who were never able to learn the difference between “your” and “you’re”, giving us the fine points about munitions.
Unreal.
The amount of faked footage is arguably worse. But I agree mate.
Sir please show us how minigun works
Is this an older footage?
Really like the systems we do use here in sweden, even if some is of foreign designs from start but thats small arms fire
21:28 it doesn’t measure concussion. It measures acceleration. 25 g means 25 times the acceleration caused by gravity, i.e. 9.81 m/sec^2
Make a video of using first time Canon in the world and what is range
25:50 - Yeah, that was definitely different footage, they would be so close
We had the TOW anti tank gun and the LAWS rocket
1:49 that’s an RPG2. It fires a fin stabilised projected grenade - the PG2. The PG2 isn’t a rocket.
RPG actually originally stood for ‘hand held anti tank weapon’. For example, the RPG43 is an anti-tank hand grenade.
Yeah and if you bothered to listen to the video he has a Russian dude say exactly that......
@@DarkKatzy013 I did hear it. The issue is with the choppy editing.
Stinger for flying tanks 😂
8:50 eventually a proper made concrete wall in US made show. It appeared that they've needed to go to Europe to find one.
Combat Service and combat service support units in US Army separate brigade and divisions should be equipped with the AT4s for self defense.
Now that was really cool veiwing
SMAW Shielded Metal Arc Welding
guided bullets is the key.
AT-4 cost 3k USD
RPG-7 cost 350 USD and is reuseable
Totally missed out ww2 anti tank weapons
Still waiting for the devs to bring back the Schewer Gustav
This documentary failed to mention The Projector, Infantry, Anti Tank (PIAT) Mk I of the British in World War 2.
The swedes really knows how to build scary weapons 👍🏻
A friend made the first 1 Million 9mm rounds for the SMAW project.
I want one!
An anti tank show with a stinger and not a tow
Warum wurde der Grüne Container aufgeschnitten, direkt hinter der Stahlbeton Wand?😕
Assaultman says - SMAW
Carl Gustav, AT-4, NLAW, GLSDB, Excalibur, RBS 15-17, IRIS-T, Meteor
SAAB producing the best weapons ever made 🇸🇪🤙
Javelin?
we used the Gustav 84mm.. it was something
Clears your nose for sure😂
All Bend down to the RPG-7
Lmao the RPG 7 warhead was half inside and half out 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I thought it was the German army that had the first anti tank rocket?? Can't remember the name of it though!😮
Panzerfaus
It was a wonderful historical coverage video about mobile bunkers ( tanks) and statistics bunkers ,& flying bunkers in low altitudes anti weapons ,thank you 🙏( war stories) channel for sharing
Normally, I find his presentation a bit full on. But, getting to play with that lot (a panzerfaust!!) - today he's forgiven.
How many M72 LAWs you'll carry compared to AT4 in terms of weight?
Germany in 1939 did not yet have Panthers.
The typical "Blitzkrieg tanks were the Panzer III and Panzer IV
No Javelin missile?
It must be an older documentary
No Malyutka.? Before all these modern laser guided missile systems there was Malyutka. It decimated Israeli tanks back in 1973. In total, Malyutkas knocked out more than 800 Israeli tanks and other combat vehicles during the war.
There talking about man portable
@williamspitzschuh8167 Dude javelins are man Portable although heavy
@@ladeedaajavelin was introduced in 1996
Wow no options for enemies survive
rpg, that sustainer motor doesnt come out of the back
Yassin 105 🔻🔻👏🏾
No PIAT? 😢.
what about the javelin rocket?
There talking about man portable which Javelin is, heavy portable
The PIAT ? The British projector could be safely fired from indoors, and kill any tank with a square hit. Near 450,000 built during WW 2. This show is for entertainment purpose , please do not write a term paper on this show alone.
what about PIAT?
Doesnt the british PIAT get a mention
Why do these modern anti-tank weapons have to be so expensive?
I'm sure you can find cheaper in China. You're asking a lot, just lot at the economy
Why no reload ?
8:14 this does not look highly professional because the guy does not even bother wearing eye protection.