NFL Most Crazy Controversial Endings to Games
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
- Discord: / discord
Instagram: goo.gl/DerXkT
Twitter: goo.gl/ou6Rfv
Gaming channel: goo.gl/vqRzn2
Second channel: goo.gl/3dpp3v
google plus: goo.gl/pHqYfm
Outro Song: JJD & Alex Skrindo - Aurora
Contact (business): If you want to contact me on business terms, use my business email (link in about section)
Contact (Personal): If you are a fan and want to casually talk to me or collab with me, contact me through either Instagram or Twitter, if it is urgent, then I will allow you to use my business email
Check out my friend's podcast: goo.gl/CcP6SK
(All rights go to the original leagues and their broadcasters, no copyright infringement intended. If I feature clips that you own and that you don't want me to feature, contact me via my business email (link in about section) and I'll take it down as soon as I can)
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." 
Спорт
10 second rule should not be allowed to end a game
If u run out of timeouts u can just fake injuries to get free timeouts, thats why rule is there
Trust me the offense would rather have 10 second run off then running time. Yeah if one of your players gets hurt and can't get up and there is 8 seconds left you lose. However if there is 14 seconds you get an extra time out so its screws the defense too.
100 percent agree!
Like he said at 4:37 "You CAN'T end the game that way!"
Well, they did it anyway.
That would defeat it's intended purpose though. To prevent teams from getting free timeouts to keep the game from ending.
"By rule ..." = your team is screwed, especially if you are the Detroit Lions.
Brent Granger I am and it happens every year
Wow.... Detriot Lions luck.....
Jennings definitely had an interception
Flapjack Films yup
Techinacally they both had hands on it so the call on the field is the call you can’t decide although I agree the packers player had more of the ball
@@speedy674 Well, watching the footage, Jennings had the ball to his chest while the wide receiver only had his hands on it. Jennings had *full control* of the ball.
That was a pick. Then tate puffing his chest like he's hot shit afterwards was just annoying.
@@todd7684 The same goes for Pete Carroll knowing they had just stolen a win.
10 second runoff ending games is the worst rule in football it should be 1 more play with clock at :00 like an extra point play
Totally agree
Then it would incentivize teams to either fake an injury or commit a penalty if they were in a situation where they couldn't stop the clock. 10 second runoffs are great.
NFL should just adopt CFL rules
I get the injury and penalty points, but the Lions did nothing wrong and basically got punished because the refs made the wrong call of the field.
This. 2010 Music City Bowl. Tennessee Vols vs UNC Tar Heels. Heels are driving late trailing by three with no timeouts. They get a first down play in field goal range with under :10 left. On the hurry up snap the Heels are called for too many men on the field. There was one second left on the clock. The penalty benefits them more than what a penalty is supposed to do which is PENALIZE a team. The penalty stops the clock which allows the Heels to kick the tying field goal to send the game to OT where they win. How was any of that fair to Tennessee? The ten second runoff is a good rule to penalize teams who intentionally get penalized to their benefit.
The 10 sec run off is a terrible rule
You can thank the players who once faked injuries to get extra time outs, they had to put that rule in place because of that.
I think OC might be talking about the lions play
@@gimbobjenkins405 they should allow benefit of doubt tho. Like if someone broke their leg it would be stupid to end the game there
It would be but by rule....and only if its a player on offense.
What would your alternative rule be?
Calvin Johnson got screwed on that call
Man yes, him and Jesse - Dez too.
Gb got screwed too so did the Steelers
Jags got screwed my music city forward pass
Their inability to hold on to the ball after they hit the ground is what screwed them, the refs just called them on it.
Music City Miracle was quite clearly directly sideways
I'm not a packer or lion fan but those two calls were horrible and should have gone to them.
Rogent X yeah same
Rogent X hyu
I think that's terrible your not a packers or lions fan Rogent X but I agree with you those two calls were horrible
I'm a Seahawks fan but the ball was caught by Green Bay.
Justice against Golden Tate... just a shame it happened when he was a Lion and not when he was a Seahawk. I always hated how cocky he was saying he caught the pass from Wilson. No you didnt fool!
Wow that rams bucs play was straight dirty by tj mcdonald slamming a player into injury to a win
Oh come on. That did not change the outcome. They were not even in field goal range with UNDER 10 seconds left. That would be a very low probability situtation even for Joe Montana. He did it, but rarely, and in really amazing performances. That run-off did not change the outcome, in high probability.
@@Bill_Woo I dont see why Mike Evan's just didnt stay onfield for spike all you have to do is stand up plus they're down 2 at the 33 yard line
Oh, I misread the field position. And they had a first down so spikable; so you're right, that was doable. Chit!
he was trying to get up and get off or to the line, he wasn't 100% awake at that point
You're an idiot but ok
If this was uploaded in 2019, the saints vs rams play would totally be in there
The bucs were robbed. Evans was down with ~12 seconds left
The whistle for the injury didn't happen until under 10 seconds. The right call was made. Remember the clock doesn't stop when he was down, it was when he was determined to be an injured player.
@@formercoach1202 yet even that is not true because if you pause at 11 seconds u can hear the whistle being blown
0:00 interception and will always be one
Except for that call when it was needed to be interception. It wasn't an interception there :)
Damn right
I'm a Seahawks fan and I agree that was an interception
Not according to the stats of that game
referees are the most hated people in the sport. Change my mind
Nope, you're completely right. and they deserve it too.
Zaylor Broff Welp I Like the lions so the good-bad call ratio is about 1-15
Bill Belichick. Colin Kaepernick. Roger Goodell.
Bandwagon fans.
Ihop Hopkins Anyone on the Cowboys
I’m expecting to see the majority of this the lions getting screwed over
Except in the falcons game
I bro lions are the best team in the nfl change my mind you can’t
Or the pats being given the game
PrecyseTheWise are you dumb the ball was in the end zone
Sad bc lions are my favorite team
You got one of the most supportive fanbases and I’m happy to be a part of it.
The 10 second run off rule sucks because all the defense needs to do is if the other team has no timeouts just keep injuring the other teams players
The Seahawks packers game ending still makes me mad
Silva701 why because the Seahawks are 100% better in every way I know
@@Tidpodlovers well when this game happened yeah but not anymore
Silva701 yeah we 300% better now
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Maybe but let's just have this season play out then talk trash
Seehawks packers were rigged packers had that
I agree that should have been a interception
the replacement refs at their best
It's technically correct, if both offensive player and defensive player have possession of a ball (i.e. tie), offensive player gets it. Seahawk player clearly catch the ball (i.e. establish posession) and both the packers player and the seahawk play had a hold of the ball (so tie goes to seahawks).
Furthermore, the play stops as soon as touchdown is score (i.e. the catch and the fact that possession was maintained after contact with ground)
@@usclaxx10 First you can stop tryna talk smart and get your grammat fixed!!!!!!!
@@usclaxx10 defensive player definitely had it first
The Holy Roller is just not the same without the San Diego chicken collapsing in agony! hahhaahahaha Thank you for more great work, SBS!!!!
Forgive me for not recognizing you, PPS!
Pls tell me a little more about you! What you can.
This is a great channel! Great resource. None of those communists in the grt durbate like sports! hahhahahhha
Gman refuses to a hangout with me on the NBA but since he is a Knicks fan I feel his pain and will not press the mattter!
Yes! Check out the show tomorrow!!! Extra hilarious! Jason was rolling!
That is not me. I have never spoken about or to Drag's wife.
Bottlegate should be on here, but I don't know if there's any video of that online. Edit: There is.
Agreed as a Browns fan that is literally the NFL going back on its own rules and then trying to make up an excuse to say that they were in the right.... they blatantly went back on their own rules that they created...
Agreed, Bottlegate belongs here. One of the most blatant screwjobs I've ever seen
Packers Seahawks games were always insane
I fucking hate it. I wish nothing but harm to come to SEA
whats the hate with the seahawks my g, we arnt even that good now u all still hating
@@chris.hartliss nope seahawks should have won and they did.
christian Gangewer The packers should have won as soon as the ball touched m.d. Jennings he had control and golden tate didn't but the refs were "replacement" refs so they were idiots and they decided to wait til the fight over who had the ball was over and golden tate got it because his teammates helped rip it away from m.d. Jennings. The refs sucked. Packers should have won.
Ok well Seattle got intercepted on the goal line to lose the super bowl so y’all can shut up about a season game
the lions should not have had a run off, because it was not a penalty or an injury timeout by the lions, it was a timeout initiated by the officials, which means that they have to go back to a running clock, but since the timeout was by the officials, then there is not allowed to be a runoff, they start the clock on the whistle. However I believe this might have to do with the fact that this was the lions, but even more perplexing it didn't happen on thanksgiving.
This 10-second runoff (at 4:05) is due to a ruling reversal on replay. After the 2-minute warning of a half, if an on-field call that stops the clock (here, a touchdown) is changed to one that keeps the clock running (down by contact), there is a 10-second runoff to account for the time that would have been spent to spot the ball, plus the clock will start at the spot (i.e. the ready-for-play signal that starts the play clock). Neither team can decline the runoff, but either team can call a timeout, if any, to prevent it.
@@TroyVan6654 Which is a bad rule. Had the officials not messed up a call in the last two minutes of the game, which required a replay reversal, the Lions may have gotten to the line and snapped the ball from the 1/2 yard line with time still on the clock. The teams get penalized due to poor officiating.
PACKERS CLEARLY HAD THAT AND IM A TEXANS FAN BUT I ALSO LOVE SEAHAWAKS AND HATE PACKERS BUT PACKER'S HAD IT
That was the year with the referee strike and they had all three stupid backups
Yeah I’m a packer fan and that was intercepted
Hey I’m a Texans and Seahawks fan coincidentally
Fuck your Texans suck
True. Ray Charles could see the Packers had it - and he's blind........and DEAD!
6:00
Ball Science: Its all about where the ball goes
The first call was AWFUL!!! Tate should’ve been called for pass-interference in the first place. But the worst part was that there was a CLEAR interception made by Jennings! That’s TWO mistakes there! Also, O’Harris’ play is NOT controversial. He clearly caught the ball before it hit the ground! Pats fan here!
Agreed however the guys name is Franco Harris.
You dont see if the ball hit the ground or not simply becuase of the video angles given to us. That's why its even controversial
It's not hitting the ground, apparently back then there was some rule about batting the ball to your own teammate or something like that
@@keivncraft1561 yeah i forgot about this ^ apparently the rule was if the ball bounced off a player than a player on the same team catches it its still incomplete
@@lightyagami3492 something like that. Im glad that rule changed
At 0:59 packers had the interception, and As much as I hate the Steelers and the patriots, that should of been a touch down at 2:42...yes he fumbled with one hand, but never lost the ball with his other....refs umfed that one up..
look at the knee and the ball on the steelers play. That isnt a TD
pause at 2:01
Yes but doesnt his knee go down just as the ball is halfway across the goal line? I thought the nose of the ball only had to start crossing the white line to be a touchdown?? If his knee went down just before the ball crosses the goal...it's dam close...
hole N one that is correct ONCE THE BALL IS CAUGHT and the player becomes a runner, however in this case the player never even caught the ball to begin with because he didn’t complete the process and survive the ground. I got loose and the ball touched the ground during the process so it was an incomplete pass. Correct call by the refs.
U see golden tate saying no he's saying it cause he didn't catch it
Seahawks definitely got picked by Jennings in the first video
Dan Kerns this is the first video
"First video" it's "Clip" dumby!
@@OoF_NuGgEt he means there are videos of plays that are compiled within a video so he's not wrong...
Calvin Johnson’s catch made me cringe how it was no good
The refs MADE Calvin Johnson retire I hate refs
Even though im a seahawks fan. WTF. what are they thinking? Jennings 100% caught that...
Hey, I mean we won
@@iuzivzt_ It wasn’t a real win Jennings had more possession yall didn’t deserve the win
I remember that Steelers and Patriots game. Every time I see this I see the receiver maintain possession of the football all the way until after the elbow hits. The call may have been right, but wrong all the same. This was the game that changed the rules for the next season. It was also a very pivotal game that could have place the Steelers above the Patriots in the playoffs. It would have been interesting to see a possible Steagles superbowl. Same goes for the Lions game. We all know that both those receivers earned those catches.
1:16 The most memorial part of this whole thing is how close Carroll is to the official when he makes the call, how Carroll signals HIMSELF a touchdown after the official announces the call, and then how Carroll pumps him his arm is a celebratory salute right afterwards. I still have NEVER anything this like this, live on TV, in a college or NFL football game. Just absolutely freaking bizarre. I mean, why wasn't the ref at the center of the football field?
As a lions fan, I ablsoultly hate the green bay slackers but that play was an should've been and interception
I’m a bears fan and I think the first call was to the packers
no shit
Super Crust Bear Down!! We’re having a good season (;
@@xcele to bad it ended in a double doink
When a bears fan take side with the packers you know something serious happened 😆
Bears are dog
That last play was crazy lol, they both pushed it forward. The quarterback threw it, and the 2nd guy pushed it forward and the third gave it a small tap and then couldn't get it and managed to fall on it hahaha. That shit was crazyyyy
3:24 The ref almost looked and sounded apologetic about needing to enforce the ten second runoff.
the Packers/Seahawks call was bull..Imma packer fan and still gets me mad.
If you haven't do best kick returns in sports history
Sade it would be easier making a list of kick returns that were called back for holding or a block in the back
Why aint you uploading man I love your vids
He is taking a break from RUclips. I don’t know if he is coming back or not, but he is taking a break
@@aidan8153 wow a ten month break
War_ Josh _ yeah... he quit youtube
That Saints v Rams game HAS to be added to this at some point
My favorite part is 0:00 - 11:03
IBRICk 8 Plus me too
I hate the Packers soooo much, but they got screwed on that play.
@Benny Alv A Packer defender touched the ball first. That's CLEARLY an interception. The refs fucked that up badly.
@@chris.hartliss You don't even know what team I root for, dumbass.
Go pack go....
I'm a Packers fan and I rage so hard everytime this play happens. Hope the refs who called that play were fired.
According to the NFL the "Process of the Catch" still applies during an Interception. If that is truly the case then the call was correct. However, I'm never sure whether to believe the NFL or not. If it is true that just seems so wrong.
What's "controversial" about Franco Harris catching the deflected pass? 8:46
David U
Back in the day, a pass was considered incomplete if an offensive receiver batted the ball to a teammate. Clearly, the Steelers did not write that up, and the Raiders simply made an honest mistake by not batting the ball down.
Ah, interesting. Thanks for the explanation!
Well for one you actually couldn't catch that ball it was illegal to do that after it was it like that by Tatum also that people say that the ball hit the ground before franko caught it.
Watch the “A Football Life” for the immaculate reception. It’s fascinating, they cover all the angles and why some people believe it’s an illegitimate play.
It was illegitimate because it was a intended pass to the other wr, but it was batted
0:20 how the referees looked at each other like oh my gosh
When Las Vegas cannot be screwed on a pick.
When the call decides the game I honestly think the refs decide the home team. Unless you’re the Pats than they call in favor of them. Or if you’re the Lions than they call it against them.
Refs do not call in favor of pats lol biggest bs I've ever heard
Molly B. Then you clearly have never watched a Pats game before.
Nerd 0208 I'm a pats fan lol
Molly B. Should’ve known, Pats fans think the refs are fair, lol.
@@2MollyB He is absolutely correct but then again Pats fans don't think they cheat either
Part II please
Was the Raiders game the reason for the "can't advance a fumble" rule?
Yes sir. That rule went into effect the very next season, '76 maybe?
6:00-6:05 Best throw in NFL history! EVER. PERIOD! & I'm not even a Titans fan, but I definitely give credit where credit's due!
Doesnt change the fact that the ball moved a full yard forward. Forward pass. It's simple science.
@@travisneu9599 Maybe not a *full* yard, but it's difficult to tell if it was a forward pass looking at the camera angles. If the one camera was set right at the yard line the ball was thrown, than people would be able to know.
It was a lateral.
Why was there a 10 second runoff in the Lions-Falcons game? The call was changed in review. If the call had been made properly on the field the Lions would have called timeout because they had one left. I don't get that one.
although its obvious that they would have called one, the referee is not allowed to assume that they would have called one.
What’s the point of the 10 second run off?
Good question
doing ma research it appears that, that rule has been in the NFL since 1955 however i don't think i've ever heard refs call for a 10 sec. runoff more times in a season than this past couple years. as if they just now discovered it was a rule. i personally think it needs to be changed to keep up with the times but i digress
Cody Tesch disagree*
If you have an injury in the last 2 minutes you must call a time-out to deal with it. The team with the injured player did not have a time out left to call, hence the runoff. It's to prevent teams from stopping the clock by faking injuries.
I think whats controversial is the fact that they had 13 seconds left yet they let it go to 0:08. like do you guys have to call everything on the spot 10 seconds after a play. just review it
I was an NFL fan for almost 50 years. One of the many reasons that I watch very little now, is the penalties. They have become so cumbersome and tedious. I feel like I'm watching a bunch of lawyers arguing almost every game.
All these years later, but I finally saw an angle on the music city miracle where it shows that it was a lateral
U back
In the first one it should have been a pick. Jennings went up for the ball and got it. Then the Seahawk receiver put his hands on it to make it look like a touchdown. The referees got fooled.
Ishaan Singh it was the right call
6:14 BS call. That was an awesome catch.
If only the rams saints play happened when this video was made
Calvin's knee arm and hand with 2 steps in the endzone. Lions and refs are rivals.
He was technically in the process of falling to the ground. You have to maintain possession. He didn't. Even though he could have, *he didn't.*
Don Hill Piss Off
@@KevinTriforce I'll happily piss off. Doesn't make me wrong.
How did you get your hands on the Fail Mary?
Oh, and the Pats rigged the refs on the Jesse James one
Darn those pats, knowing the rulebook inside and out and "rigging" the refs to accurately interpret the rules on the books at the time. The refs should listen to fans who don't know the rules at all and judge based purely on emotion instead!
With death threats.
@@hagamapama stop being a salty mo fo and except that the steelers beat you once
Giants fan here, and I don’t think that it was rigged that’s legit the rules
@@jacobwaterman4607 Do you mean to say "expect" or "accept"?
A 10 second runoff because of a injured player is one of the most BS rules ever. Why run the clock if a player is injured?
4:12 THIS GUY LOVED BREAKING THE NEWS...YOU CAN SEE IT IN HIS FACE...HE JUST LOVED IT>
What about the one where the Patriots cleared the snow before kicking the field goal?
If you're talking about the Tuck Rule game, there's no rule against players clearing snow with their shoes. If you're talking about the snowplow game, was that at the very end of the game?
@@elliebrown8633 I'm just about certain, yeah. I would have to rewatch it though to he certain
Packers won, Steelers got robbed. End of discussion. Btw, Jesse James crossed the plane meaning it's a touchdown regardless of whether or not he had control when hitting the ground. Since he crossed the plane, resulting in a touchdown, anything after that is irrelevant.
steelers didnt get robbed thats the rule, the rule does fucking suck
KING GIL the rule shouldn’t need a frame-by-frame slow motion replay to check a call. It was supposed to prevent obvious mix ups. Should have been a td.
Tell that to Dez... Oh wait that was called incomplete as well as it should have been. That being said The rule is changed now so we will see how this turns out in the future
Shawn Harrison fam that rule is only applicable to someone running the ball in like a running back or catch and run not a catch you dummy
I’m a steeler fan all the way and was at that game. He’s knees hit the ground before it anyway so if anything that should have called him down where his knee hit the ground. They shouldn’t have called it an incomplete pass.
Got a football ad before this
3:45
That kicker was like "thank christ!"
Here before viral
The lions were screwed over that day!
6:52 was so clearly a touchdown
How do you forget the most controversial ending ever. Bottlegate. The refs review a play 2 plays later. Over turn the play. Fans throw thousands of bottles on the field. Refs call the game. Teams go to locker rooms. NFL calls and says they have to finish the game. Any player who hasn't undressed yet comes out and the offense takes a knee to run the clock out.
That lions and falcons ending still pisses me off. Lions lose because of a refs mistake. Lovely.
Kyle Angeleri yeah but that’s happens all the time(Bears fan)
He was touched down tho
PrecysePiere It doesn’t matter that he was touched down. The call on the field was a touchdown and the refs fucked it up. There should be no 10 second run off for a mistake by the officials it’s a terrible rule and cost the lions a shot at the game.
that game also ended up being the tiebreaker for the #6 seed in the playoffs
Aidan s I guarantee it would not take any NFL team ten seconds to line up for the next play.
The 1st one was an interception
The Music City Miracle will always haunt me. The best chance the Jags had at a superbowl and we were so close to not having to play the titans a third time that would've given us a shot at the Rams.
That Packers Seahawks game was the worst game of football I've ever seen. So many calls were just bad for both teams. Those refs deserved to be fired on the spot after that game.
Jennings had that
You actually forgot another one its Dez Bryant and the catch but ruled incomplete
They actually would've had 4 minutes
Oh you mean the INCOMPLETE pass?
@@chris.hartliss yup
The ball hit the ground and bounced... he didnt have possession of the ball
If the ball hits the ground before he has possession its incomplete
Wanna know what makes the Seattle- Tampa ending extra bullshit? The refs blew their whistles at 11 seconds left and no one gave a shit enough to actually check
Being from Pittsburgh, I must say how dare you call the Immaculate Reception "controversial"
All of these are pretty bad, but the Falcons/Lions clip at 4:01 is the best of all.
Clayton C. There a still image that shows that tate was half a yard away and was down
@@makaibrown8297 that's not the screwjob, it's the runoff of the clock.. which was caused by the refs reviewing the play. If it was called down at the .5 yard line we could've got another play off cause the Lions and Stafford are actually good at getting plays off quick. They're just not good at pretty much anything else.
@@therealHannibus no that's just how the rules work
Makai Brown Actually, if you look at it correctly, Tate's knee is still up until the ball crosses the line. Even if he was down though, the only reason they lost is because the REFS messed up the call in the first place. We should be punished because of the refs screwing up. Also 28-3
The packers had a interception
I always loved that Steve McNair celebration because it looked like he was floating. Now we know he was riding a boogie board 20 years before anyone else
That Gasper thou at the end 😂
Don't let this distract you from the fact that the Seahawks should not have been in Super Bowl 49..the packers really should've been..and I'm a pats fan btw, anyways that firstv video was absolute bullshit, that was not a Touchdown at all, anyone with a brain knows that..and the second video wasn't a TD either
washburn11000 how shouldn't we been in Superbowl 49, Jermaine Kearse literally got a clear touchdown in Overtime, maybe your thinking of the wrong game but I don't know
Why was there a 10 sec run off for the Lions Falcons game when the refs were the ones overturning the call? There wasn’t a penalty or a challenge by either team. The 10 sec runoff doesn’t apply there.
The rule, as I understand it, is that if the clock is running, and the officials have to stop the clock for an automatic review, there is a 10 second runoff after the play. It's designed to prevent a team from benefitting of the officials make an incorrect call in their favor.
For example, 5 seconds left, clock is running, and the quarterback throws it to a receiver at the goalline. The receiver catches the ball, and falls to the ground. It is ruled a touchdown. The play is reviewed, and it is determined that he was actually down at the 1/2 yard line. Had the correct call ben made, there is no way that the offense would have been able to reset at the line of scrimage and run another play. They shouldn't get a free play because the officials made the incorrect call initially.
Though I feel bad for the Lions, Tate getting that TD taken away was poetic justice for the refs giving him the GB catch.
Normally, if a pass is caught by both the receiver and defender AT THE SAME TIME, the tie goes to the offense, and that is what the replacement ref was calling in the SEA-GB game. However, you can clearly see, at 1:04 of this video (and the replay official should have been able to see this also) that ONLY the Green Bay defender caught the ball initially. Since that was the case, now, if the receiver gets his hands in there and gets partial possession, the tie no longer goes to him...…..it goes to the player that first caught the ball which was the Green Bay player.Instead of talking with the other official, in an attempt to get it right, the replacement official who signaled TD, said in subsequent interviews, that he wanted to make a call quickly, so no one would think he was unsure. Well, trying to protect your image, at the expense of getting the call right, is a sign of a bad official.
Noti squad
The music city miracle isn’t controversial. Only salty bills fans still think it’s not a lateral.
I know, right, that play was awesome, and clearly a lateral.
on the rules it's a lateral but we all know that it isnt
It's very blatantly a lateral, I don't understand why people are still contesting it.
lol right
what happened to the packers cowboys 2014 playoffs
You should have made this video a few days later after that Packers/Vikings game.
EXACTLY. LIKE 3 FUCKING BOGUS CALLS
The worst being the RTP
Go pack go.....
Brian EXE Spartan 2 go pack go into lose season
Stealers did not catch that. Even then, why go for it? Kick. The danm. Field goal.
When brandin cooks does the same thing it's a game winner smh
Epic police the refs also missed a clipping call on that play.
It doesnt really matter if he caught it, it was in the end zone so the play should have ended right there and thats a touchdown
He caught it and with the rule adjustment that's a catch this year.
{{{{{{{bradley}}}}}}} not by last years rules.
CONGRATS ON 300K!
You could make a whole video of the Lions. Golden Tate catch - run off. Calvin Johnson - non-catch. Aaron Rodgers - Hail Mary. Seahawks - batted ball. Good times...
Tony Romo is the worst commentator ever
Christian Wolf alongside Joe Buck
Hes the best
Christian Wolf Gonna guess you’re a troll
Wdym hes the best
Troy Aikman and Joe Fuck are clearly the worst
You haven't posted in so long
Not a bucs fan but there was 12 seconds left when he was down
There was nothing to stop the play so it was just one of those crummy things that happen. They also couldn't let play continue with an injured player on the field. Crummy rule maybe, but it was designed to stop teams from stopping the clock with fake injuries.
At 3:08, if I were lovie Smith I wouldve argued that there was 12 seconds left when Evans got hurt, so they would've had 2 seconds left after the runoff
that first one dude at the end of it he looks at the crowd and goes "NO THAT WAS WRONG" and signals that he didnt catch it. Good guy
Great video. Some of the most iconic plays in NFL history.
Crazy I remember when you had 800 subs!
I’ve googled and I still don’t understand the 10 second runoff. It’s too confusing
It's not confusing.
Let's take the scenario with the Lions. A receiver catches the ball and dives for the endzone. It is ruled a touchdown, and the clock is stopped with 8 seconds left. They review, and determine that the player was down prior to the ball breaking the plane of the goal line. If the officials had made the right call on the field, then the clock doesn't stop with 8 seconds left, it continues running, and the offense has to try and get set and run another play. That is going to take some time. The rules have to account for that time, so the rules committee determiened that, on average, it would take a team 10 seconds to get set for another play. If there wasn't a 10 second runoff, then the Lions would have had more than a minute to get ready for the next play. That wouldn't be fair to the defense.