The interaction of particles like electrons and positrons through pair production and annihilation illustrates that energy and matter are connected through fields, not a mechanical medium like the aether. The creation of electron-positron pairs from high-energy photons and their subsequent annihilation into gamma rays demonstrates that particles interact directly via quantum fields, not through an aether. Modeled through the hyperbola and torus in a repeated pattern displayed from the microcosm to macrocosm.
The interaction of particles through pair production and annihilation are physical attributes, fields are descriptions of physical actions. There is a difference between action and object.
Those are beliefs and faith based on mathematics, not mechanics and comprehension from first principles. You can't say what a field is, you don't know where the pairs come from. It's faith based in models that happen to work just like "Praying to the fishing tree" works for hunter-gatherers. Natives who use root toxins ritualistically but don't understand the nature of the mechanics at play. They use real and reliable systems in superstitious ways that are factually useful but are not comprehension. I don't mean to be harsh here. But you're talking about things which are intrinsically superstitious even though clothed in the robes of "science." They are metaphysical statements without basis. Until you can find the bottom level faiths of a system and the baseless claims it has embedded in it, you know nothing about the system. Fields are hand-waving. (based on concepts invented for aether) Waves are gerunds. They are verbs pretending to be nouns but you don't notice because of linguistic tricks and superstitious tradition. All systems eventually have a bottom "turtle." The bottom turtle I propose is far beneath your bottom turtle. ...but it's still turtles all the way down.
@@SteamPunkPhysics Harsh, maybe deserved. Religion is a point of view. When we die, we tend to measure ourselves by our actions and accomplishments rather than the carcass buried in the ground. But I will still state that fields themselves are not objects, but motion patterns of many objects.
@@martinsoos I was responding to him not you. Fields aren't objects, just as you say. I agree. They are actions. Just like waves aren't objects. They are actions. Maxwell and MacCullagh designed the field concept and both were a reference to alterations of a medium. ...and incidentally I have no problem with people's faith-based beliefs. I support a view of spinoza's god and a information-theoretical view of spirituality. The issue is when we don't identify faith-based beliefs and assumed axioms. Modern physics is absolutely inundated with hidden faith-based beliefs and they believe in science as their religion. They believe superstitiously without understanding what they believe or how it all connects up. They defend their beliefs viciously and vehemently. The religious minds don't disappear when religion does. It's a mental behavior disconnected from spirituality. The mainstream ideations are utterly disconnected from reality and math consistent math doesn't say a damn thing about reality if the rational mapping between the math and what the math means isn't properly managed. I don't care how pretty your map is if you color the water green and the forests blue because you are copying from someone elses map you can still accidentally think there are fish in the wrong place. The connection between map and reality is the place where we are screwed. It's the key that's screwed up. They don't know what the map means anymore and they keep extending and refining it from false beginnings.
@@SteamPunkPhysics 🙂 To SteamPunk, The average human mind is not capable of grasping all of known physics. The concept of wrong physics is a tougher one to deal with since our schools require that we give a required answer rather than question if things don't quite add up. And once that problem is graduated from, there is the problem of getting financing for anything in physics from people that are clueless. I once thought to beat a flat earther that I am rather fond of, but that would only make them both stupid and abused. It's just not worth getting angry at stupid. I have learned to smile and disagree with some small point given.
The interaction of particles like electrons and positrons through pair production and annihilation illustrates that energy and matter are connected through fields, not a mechanical medium like the aether.
The creation of electron-positron pairs from high-energy photons and their subsequent annihilation into gamma rays demonstrates that particles interact directly via quantum fields, not through an aether.
Modeled through the hyperbola and torus in a repeated pattern displayed from the microcosm to macrocosm.
The interaction of particles through pair production and annihilation are physical attributes, fields are descriptions of physical actions. There is a difference between action and object.
Those are beliefs and faith based on mathematics, not mechanics and comprehension from first principles.
You can't say what a field is, you don't know where the pairs come from. It's faith based in models that happen to work just like "Praying to the fishing tree" works for hunter-gatherers. Natives who use root toxins ritualistically but don't understand the nature of the mechanics at play. They use real and reliable systems in superstitious ways that are factually useful but are not comprehension.
I don't mean to be harsh here. But you're talking about things which are intrinsically superstitious even though clothed in the robes of "science."
They are metaphysical statements without basis. Until you can find the bottom level faiths of a system and the baseless claims it has embedded in it, you know nothing about the system.
Fields are hand-waving. (based on concepts invented for aether) Waves are gerunds. They are verbs pretending to be nouns but you don't notice because of linguistic tricks and superstitious tradition.
All systems eventually have a bottom "turtle." The bottom turtle I propose is far beneath your bottom turtle. ...but it's still turtles all the way down.
@@SteamPunkPhysics Harsh, maybe deserved. Religion is a point of view. When we die, we tend to measure ourselves by our actions and accomplishments rather than the carcass buried in the ground. But I will still state that fields themselves are not objects, but motion patterns of many objects.
@@martinsoos I was responding to him not you. Fields aren't objects, just as you say. I agree. They are actions. Just like waves aren't objects. They are actions. Maxwell and MacCullagh designed the field concept and both were a reference to alterations of a medium.
...and incidentally I have no problem with people's faith-based beliefs. I support a view of spinoza's god and a information-theoretical view of spirituality.
The issue is when we don't identify faith-based beliefs and assumed axioms. Modern physics is absolutely inundated with hidden faith-based beliefs and they believe in science as their religion. They believe superstitiously without understanding what they believe or how it all connects up.
They defend their beliefs viciously and vehemently. The religious minds don't disappear when religion does. It's a mental behavior disconnected from spirituality.
The mainstream ideations are utterly disconnected from reality and math consistent math doesn't say a damn thing about reality if the rational mapping between the math and what the math means isn't properly managed.
I don't care how pretty your map is if you color the water green and the forests blue because you are copying from someone elses map you can still accidentally think there are fish in the wrong place.
The connection between map and reality is the place where we are screwed. It's the key that's screwed up. They don't know what the map means anymore and they keep extending and refining it from false beginnings.
@@SteamPunkPhysics 🙂 To SteamPunk, The average human mind is not capable of grasping all of known physics. The concept of wrong physics is a tougher one to deal with since our schools require that we give a required answer rather than question if things don't quite add up. And once that problem is graduated from, there is the problem of getting financing for anything in physics from people that are clueless.
I once thought to beat a flat earther that I am rather fond of, but that would only make them both stupid and abused. It's just not worth getting angry at stupid. I have learned to smile and disagree with some small point given.