@@LogicalCast if you have time , please can you make a video on "Argument from Dependency ". It really made me to accept for a moment, the existence of a superior being. I discussed it with Chatgpt. Chatgpt said the argument is logically framed. Chatgpt also mentioned many points but using 'But' denying for the agreement with the argument, which flew over my head. Even if it exists, obviously it is not as what we humans believe, how religions describe the GOD. So where the problem comes, in accepting the existence of a superior being or God through this argument? Doesn't it can prove it properly?
@@ganeshboro-002 I guess you are talking about contingency argument this argument has some problems 1. any person using this argument reaches to the conclusion of god by declaring it as a problem. why is it a problem? why is infinite regression a problem? why the past just can't be infinite i.e infinite chain of dependency 2. contingency argument claim than every this is dependent on something or we can say everything has a cause to exist what is the proof that everything is dependent? there is a huge unobservable universe which we don't even know about , but even if we take this observable universe is it really true that everything is depended on something? does a law of physics (eg- angle of incidence is equal to angle of reflection) really depend on something? would that law have been different if the scenario of this universe was different? like take any different possible scenario which could have happen after big bang. 3. if contingency argument is true, doesn't it break its own logic everything is dependent but there is a first thing which is independent or you can say that everything has a cause but there is also a first cause if it is possible for a first cause to exist, why cant that first cause be this universe itself? if it is possible for some being to be independent while every other thing is dependent , why cant it be this universe itself? 4. if there is really some superior being which why is it necessary for it to be it to be a being why cant it be a normal thing like just matter and energy and this universe evolved from it just like living being evolved for very simple cell and I just typed all this buddy😬😮💨 so please consider reading it
@32:53.... सास बहू सिरियल में कितना *"कलेश"* दिखाते थे ना .....अरे पगले वो कलेश नहीं हैं, हमारी संस्कृति में उसे हमारे culture में प्यार कहते हैं, जबतक पती अपनी बीवी को पिटेगा नहीं तबतक उन पती पत्नी मे प्यार के रिश्ते बनेंगे नहीं, 😂 जैसे कि देवी @radhikaapte ने बोला हैं "you can't hate a stranger" 😂😂😂 तुम्हें क्या पता "एक औरत" दुसरी औरत को पिटते देख कैसा thrill महसूस करती हैं, यूँ हि थोड़ी इतने सालों तक सीरियल चला हैं, 😂😂😂 Naked Truth disturbing reality, unbelievable but true
So... you have gone full into people who are bollocks deep into left political parties. Oh well, yours was a good channel while it lasted. I suppose it was a bit too much to ask for an unbiased, non-political or politically neutral rationalist. For some reason, it seems people in India equate rationalism with left political parties which is pretty funny when one looks at the kind of success stories ex-left bastions like Tripura and West Bengal are.
It seems like you're assuming that rationality is exclusive to a political label or a particular social group. That's quite a narrow minded perspective for someone who claims to advocate for logical thought. Just as intelligence or humanity isn't confined to any one ideology or caste, neither is the ability to treat one's partner with respect which I am pretty sure you don't if you took offense to this video. It's unfortunate that you'd resort to stereotypes to strengthen your argument, as it only undermines your credibility.
@@SkanDasz What stereotype? I have been a part of those states ruined by left politics. This is experience, speaking. And sure, all political parties are bad. Then why even bring such politically motivated people? Why not stick to those who are neutral?
@@SkanDasz Also, where does treating ones partner with respect come from? And my comment has nothing to do with offense. It's with the collaboration. That's all. I haven't addressed the contents of the video. It's like saying I can't criticize someone for collabing with Tucker Curlson if Tucker made valid points? Or what if this guy brought in Sudhanshu Trivedi and HE made valid points? Still fine to collab with political stooges?
Please give up march-past comments (Left-Right-Left-Right). It is really boring. Or simply don't watch. He is not inclined to any political party or wing. It is just your own made up thought. Come out of it.
Sir please do a podcast with dr. abby Phillips(liver doctor. )🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
बिल्कुल 🙏🙏🙏
💯
Superb podcast
wow intense discussion👍
Common humans ko troll karna theek hai par non biological human jo hamare Modi ji par troll bardasht ke bahar hai.
Need timestamps
Do a podcast with Theodore shoebat if possible
To compete with voyeurism you make more voyeurism. USA makes shows like maurys. It's like ultra voyeuristic show and maybe racist.
With himanshu
This kind of podcasts are raw, I mean they are not scripted. You can find it out simply just noticing the nature of their conversation.
I liked it👍
Thanks! Yes all the podcasts are completely raw and unscripted
@@LogicalCast if you have time , please can you make a video on "Argument from Dependency ". It really made me to accept for a moment, the existence of a superior being. I discussed it with Chatgpt. Chatgpt said the argument is logically framed. Chatgpt also mentioned many points but using 'But' denying for the agreement with the argument, which flew over my head.
Even if it exists, obviously it is not as what we humans believe, how religions describe the GOD.
So where the problem comes, in accepting the existence of a superior being or God through this argument? Doesn't it can prove it properly?
@@ganeshboro-002 I guess you are talking about contingency argument
this argument has some problems
1. any person using this argument reaches to the conclusion of god by declaring it as a problem.
why is it a problem?
why is infinite regression a problem?
why the past just can't be infinite i.e infinite chain of dependency
2. contingency argument claim than every this is dependent on something or we can say everything has a cause to exist
what is the proof that everything is dependent? there is a huge unobservable universe which we don't even know about , but even if we take this observable universe is it really true that everything is depended on something? does a law of physics (eg- angle of incidence is equal to angle of reflection) really depend on something?
would that law have been different if the scenario of this universe was different? like take any different possible scenario which could have happen after big bang.
3. if contingency argument is true, doesn't it break its own logic
everything is dependent but there is a first thing which is independent
or you can say that everything has a cause but there is also a first cause
if it is possible for a first cause to exist, why cant that first cause be this universe itself?
if it is possible for some being to be independent while every other thing is dependent , why cant it be this universe itself?
4. if there is really some superior being which why is it necessary for it to be it to be a being
why cant it be a normal thing like just matter and energy and this universe evolved from it
just like living being evolved for very simple cell
and I just typed all this buddy😬😮💨
so please consider reading it
❤❤❤
❤
@32:53.... सास बहू सिरियल में कितना *"कलेश"* दिखाते थे ना
.....अरे पगले वो कलेश नहीं हैं, हमारी संस्कृति में उसे हमारे culture में प्यार कहते हैं,
जबतक पती अपनी बीवी को पिटेगा नहीं तबतक उन पती पत्नी मे प्यार के रिश्ते बनेंगे नहीं, 😂
जैसे कि देवी @radhikaapte ने बोला हैं "you can't hate a stranger" 😂😂😂
तुम्हें क्या पता "एक औरत" दुसरी औरत को पिटते देख कैसा thrill महसूस करती हैं, यूँ हि थोड़ी इतने सालों तक सीरियल चला हैं, 😂😂😂
Naked Truth
disturbing reality,
unbelievable but true
Ravi bhai himanshu bhai ko Lake ao please
Jaldi hi
Ravi Bhai ek baar Aanand srinivas stayqrious ko Lao... discussion about education system
Ok 👍
@@LogicalCast Thank you so much for considering
This podcast is atracting lot of trolls, intresting.
Bhai isko mat lao bohot shinning mar rha hai
Oh no bro. This is so red flag 🤦🏻♂️
Ikr. Vimoh was already a red flag. Now our politically 'non-funded' Meghnerd.
What is? And why is?
@@eishuno In what sense Vimoh is a red flag? What's so alarming about him ?
Here comes the holier than cow meghnath .. one of the worst commentators on politics
Ad hominem
Also, just curious, who do you consider to be a good political commentator?
@@doropomegranatesnake venom
So... you have gone full into people who are bollocks deep into left political parties. Oh well, yours was a good channel while it lasted. I suppose it was a bit too much to ask for an unbiased, non-political or politically neutral rationalist. For some reason, it seems people in India equate rationalism with left political parties which is pretty funny when one looks at the kind of success stories ex-left bastions like Tripura and West Bengal are.
It seems like you're assuming that rationality is exclusive to a political label or a particular social group. That's quite a narrow minded perspective for someone who claims to advocate for logical thought. Just as intelligence or humanity isn't confined to any one ideology or caste, neither is the ability to treat one's partner with respect which I am pretty sure you don't if you took offense to this video. It's unfortunate that you'd resort to stereotypes to strengthen your argument, as it only undermines your credibility.
@@SkanDasz What stereotype? I have been a part of those states ruined by left politics. This is experience, speaking. And sure, all political parties are bad. Then why even bring such politically motivated people? Why not stick to those who are neutral?
@@SkanDasz Also, where does treating ones partner with respect come from? And my comment has nothing to do with offense. It's with the collaboration. That's all. I haven't addressed the contents of the video. It's like saying I can't criticize someone for collabing with Tucker Curlson if Tucker made valid points? Or what if this guy brought in Sudhanshu Trivedi and HE made valid points? Still fine to collab with political stooges?
Please give up march-past comments (Left-Right-Left-Right). It is really boring. Or simply don't watch. He is not inclined to any political party or wing. It is just your own made up thought. Come out of it.
❤
❤