I have really enjoyed my Choice65. It has such a nice sound for a $120 board. I used ePBT Origami and some Roselle linear switches, and I also opted for the Alu plate, but mannnn those flower shadow switches sound great. Also I know now what you meant in your neo65 video about the keeb for your set of GMK CIV being behind lol. I was sweating it waiting for my choice65 to show up. Checking Discord every few hours and checking my emails nonstop.
Some of the placement/height of sublegends/symbols is either compressed incorrectly or not level to other sublegends/symbols of the other keys. Definitely not uniform. Esp on the " key, the ^ key, > key, and some others on the Num Row Sublegends/symbols. Also totally obvious fading on the ➡️ which is probably the most eggregious issue on the set, but the weird heights on what seems to me mostly symbol sublegends is kinda irking
@@ynoter1the P & B def seem to be SLIGHTLY bolder than others, but i think the overall boldness/print is just slightly off on many. Just not as noticeable or egregious as other issues in the set.
The more I look at it the more I see what you're talking about. But those weren't even the issue that stood out to me lol I'm not sure if the thing that stood out me shows up on video well enough though.
I was about to ask you on discord about this keycap, and now I can confirm this is different.. Aluvia cool.
Cool to the touch as well!
I have really enjoyed my Choice65. It has such a nice sound for a $120 board. I used ePBT Origami and some Roselle linear switches, and I also opted for the Alu plate, but mannnn those flower shadow switches sound great. Also I know now what you meant in your neo65 video about the keeb for your set of GMK CIV being behind lol. I was sweating it waiting for my choice65 to show up. Checking Discord every few hours and checking my emails nonstop.
This actually isn't the board I was going to use GMK Civ on lol Still waiting for that one...
@@TrashBuilds oh man I can’t wait to see if that board is as worth the wait then!
Nice vid mate
I see on the website, it could have an imperfection on the stem of the numrow making it unusable. Do you have that problem?
I personally didn't have that problem, but a lot of them were pretty tight. My friend bought a set too and they didn't have the issue either
So did any of you see what makes these keycaps B-Stock?
The P and B?
No, those appear to be fine@@ynoter1
Some of the placement/height of sublegends/symbols is either compressed incorrectly or not level to other sublegends/symbols of the other keys. Definitely not uniform. Esp on the " key, the ^ key, > key, and some others on the Num Row Sublegends/symbols.
Also totally obvious fading on the ➡️ which is probably the most eggregious issue on the set, but the weird heights on what seems to me mostly symbol sublegends is kinda irking
@@ynoter1the P & B def seem to be SLIGHTLY bolder than others, but i think the overall boldness/print is just slightly off on many. Just not as noticeable or egregious as other issues in the set.
The more I look at it the more I see what you're talking about. But those weren't even the issue that stood out to me lol I'm not sure if the thing that stood out me shows up on video well enough though.