i was born with cataracts, and had my lenses removed when i was a baby. i was never able to get artificial ones put in, so i've lived my whole life seeing like monet's lens-less eye (and some heavy prescription glasses). i'm curious about how normal people see the world compared to me. i have taken colour recognition tests and scored VERY high in accuracy, so i know i see more colours than others do. it's really cool to know that even though my vision kinda sucks even with glasses, i get to see a more vibrant world. i'm an artist, too! and maybe this is why my favourite colours are purple and blue.
Wow I can't believe no one has commented. That's amazing. Yeah i could only imagine wondering what other's can't see that you can. I find all this super interesting. Makes me want to experience it. So do you have to take special care of your eyes? Like watching what drops you use or getting in pools?
@@JoeBuk724 haha thanks! and nope, eyes carry on just fine without lenses. everything is just extremely blurry, but my prescription resolves that! i'm still visually impaired, though. i have an increased risk of glaucoma and retinal detachment as far as i know, so i make sure i get my eyes checked every year, instead of the recommended 2 years. i'm one of the last of my kind, as not long after i was born we figured out how to make implanting lenses viable in babies! the structures the lens is sewn to wasn't preserved for me though, so i'm one of the youngest people around to have this problem. pretty neat!
@@tinycatfriend Thanks for sharing! Wow that is interesting. I have to wear glasses and contacts too. Oh are contacts an option for you? Not too many people get to say they are "the last of their kind" lol. Oh I see, they removed it all so you can't get them now any way. Well that's good you can make do with glasses I recently had trouble with ghosting while reading text (particularly on a screen like a phone). So i can somewhat understand trying to explain to others what you (and only you lol) see.
@@JoeBuk724 i could use contacts, i just can't stand having to put them in. and considering how easy they are to lose, i wouldn't want to risk that when they're required for my everyday life. getting contacts (or glasses) replaced would take weeks or months because my prescription is so rare that not a lot of labs make it. i have every pair of glasses i've ever owned for this reason! haha yeah i'd love to explain how i see but alas, it's all i know~
@@tinycatfriend lol It took me a couple hours to get them in the first time, I just wasn't touching my eye enough. I still have them but quit wearing them for the most part, glasses are easier lol. But i do hate how skin flakes and stuff is always getting on them. And they stick to the lens, you can't just blow them off. Oh my, yes i didn't think of how long it must take to get special made stuff. Prob a good idea to keep the old ones around. My last ones got stepped on like Ralphie lol so I don't have those ones.
birds can also see ultra violett and the arrangement of light sensory cells in their eyes have a higher density, which makes them able to see better and they see colors stronger then we do. Having eyes like a bird would be truly amazing.
I legitimately felt sad and started crying while watching this video. I felt so bad such an amazing artist lost his talent from losing the ability to see proper colors. I really want to be an artist but I have no talent whatsoever. I admire any artist that can put their imagination to life and create a whole new world for us to see and believe.
Black or fuzzy? Monet could still see out of his eye, just that there was no lens to focus the images. It explains his paintings a lot. Correct me if I'm wrong, pls
There are other ways to repair cataracts these days, but lens removal was actually a fairly common surgery, and one that's been done since the time of the Romans. The difficult part is creating corrective lenses to still focus light on the retina.
Also, and I might be wrong about this, it might have something to do with shorter wavelength light(like ultraviolet) cause increased damage to cells, and thus would cause loss of vision long before your life would be over. I think allot of animals with short lives do not have the ultra violet lenses(birds and insects), wheres we and other long life mammals have them. I might be wrong though.
I am colorblind, and an artist. It can be very difficult. My paintings look strange, I see them as beautiful, and others do too, but it makes me sad that I will never be able to show other people what I see. Or maybe more that since what I see is so different, other people don't appreciate it. I want to make art for other people to enjoy, but I can't.
Actually, I think it's more likely that your art would give those of us without color blindness a better understanding of what you do actually see. If you mix up two hues due to seeing them as equal, we may end up getting very interesting pictures with blues in place of some greens, or blacks in place of some reds, etc. I've actually long been curious how paintings by color blind artists would look. Do you have a site featuring any of your work?
Lowraith Two of my art teachers were colorblind. :0 One of them worked almost exclusively in red and blue and he made these beautiful "fire wheel" paintings and earthworks models. A few of his paintings looked like this- www.kookseye.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Saint-Pirans-Fire.jpg He also does abstract, large scale paintings in collaboration with his wife. I have no idea what my current teacher's artwork is like, he hasn't shown us. What colors can you see with accuracy?
awkwardCrabwalk I can see all colors with above average accuracy. Which is one of the reasons colorblindness fascinates me. I can't even imagine what the world looks like from that perspective. Art produced by someone with colorblindness would be a peek into another perspective altogether, and might possibly reveal some part of the workings of the brain and how perception functions.
Lowraith I was talking to the other person, and I gave you a link to my color blind drawing teacher's artwork. Ha, I have better than average color perception, too. I took a test once, I think I got a 98% accuracy.
I got my cataract out a few weeks ago and I agree being able to see ultraviolet light is glorious and beautiful. I need to test it more but right off the bat I can definitely understand what is being described here
Man that was a tragic artist. Not only did he go through so much suffering and disappointment, he never got to know how unique and pretty the stuff became today.
I remember sitting on the bus coming home as a kid. I would sometimes change which eye I was seeing in and the way his vision was makes sense. I could see more blue in one eye and red in the other. I had thought my eyes did this to get a balanced mix of color and get a proper "image" of what the world looks like.
Oliver Sacks wrote about one of his patients, who was a painter, that acquired achromotopsia. After he obtained achromotopsia and trying to paint with color, he switched to what he still had: black, white and grey. The paintings were vastly different.
U.v. Rays are highly energetic and cause damage to cells. You'd give the back of your eye a suntan....i don't want to imagine that, but, an eye patch would protect ya....mangekyo sharingan
Bk7 or fused silica lens can do it. Although modern should contain UV absorbants since it's harmful to eyes for long living species. Better idea is to modify camera to see ultraviolet.
Yeah, there are people alive today who were given artificial lenses that don't block UV light after their cataract surgery. I believe most surgeries performed today give patients UV blocking lenses instead.
Once we get the technology to properly map nerve endings and create a synthetic connection to a computer with them, full on cyborg eyes will be possible.
wow thats crazy you guys posted a video about people who can see ultra violet light ....i was just talking about that a couple of days ago ....my left eye can see ultraviolet
When I was 6yo, the lens in my left eye was knocked out by a blow to the eye. Other than not being able to see clearly though my left eye, I didn't notice much until I was in high school. My friends and I would go to the local mall and one of our favorite stores was Spencer Gifts (the chain). Anyway, in the back of the store was a whole host of 'black-light' posters with a couple of black light fixtures. I found that if I closed my left eye (bad eye), and looked at the lights, they were that blue-purple and didn't seem to radiated any light at all (what I gather others see). However, if I closed my right eye (good eye) I and looked at the lights, their light was like a fluorescent tube.
0:31 My internet went out the excat second the Pause screen showed up. I thought that the loading icon was in your video and not youtube not loading, lol
I can see ultraviolet, but only from very strong sources that are almost horizontal to my eye... a head CT provided the clearest I've ever seen it. and its very similar to the purple from a black light, but quite a bit deeper and with a lot of "fuzziness" that makes it seem almost dark.
Could you describe why Monet's perceiving reality and paint differs? Because logically if he perceives reality more yellow, then he will choose a color from the palette what he perceives more yello, but in reality it is exactly like the real word? :) So from this viewpoint the end result of his painting shouldnt reflect his problem perceiving colors... we should see the real colors on his painting... Am I wrong?
It's not like every paint pigment gets equally shifted to the yellow, though. It's not like blue paint would all of a sudden look yellow, it's would probably just look muted and black, or yellow-black, whereas the yellows and greens would appear closer to their natural "selves". Combine that with the fact that Monet was acutely aware of color, and would have remembered that no matter what it looks like to his eye, leaves are green and he needs to add blue to yellow to make that color, whether or not it looks right to his eye, and he could have been making colors from memory and not quite getting them "right", to us at least..
It's Okay To Be Smart Thanx, but the answer's firt half didn't describe the problem (as the color of nature and the color of the paint is shifted the same, so the painting should look like the same as nature)... The second part describes it, in the case: 1, he was painting it from memory, so didn't had reference while painting... 2, he knew it's not the natural color he is painting and he made an artistical choice to shift them to please his own eyes with memories based on his earlier (good eye) state... In both cases i feel it's more an artistical choice (If he had wanted to paint naturally, he could, but he enjoyed this new idea shifting the colors), not a disability.... What do you think?
Fine Cut Bodies I don't think the color of the paint and the color of nature would shift the same. Pigments in paint aren't single-wavelength reflectors, and a color of paint doesn't reflect light the same as a color pigment in nature. Even blue paint is a spectrum of different wavelengths from blue to red, not just blue. So let's say that Monet applied a bunch of blue paint to a mix or directly to the canvas. If that blue paint was only 5% yellow, then he could add a huge amount of it and he would only experience a tiny boost in yellow, and he would think he was painting something that was actually yellow in the scene (which would be based on a completely different natural pigment), but you or I would see blue paint. Make sense? That JAMA paper linked in description might be a good place to read for more.
Very interesting video! But I'm a little sceptic about the "computer simulations" of what the world would have looked like to the aged Monet. We do not yet have comprehensive models of how exactly complex vision works- so how is it possible too simulate it satisfactorily?
I linked to the JAMA research paper that did that in the description. Cataracts should be pretty easy to model, in terms of the blurriness and color shift. What is difficult to understand is how conscious Monet was of the change and whether he tried to correct it over time.
I recently had cataracts surgery and the amount of colour that I can see now is incredible, I can’t believe how much colour is in the world! Before that, everything was dull and gloomy, it was horrible!
(@3:42): It would be kool to see a composite image of these two pieces superimposed together to see what the resulting combined image would look like!!
Dude being able to see a little bit of ultraviolet is insanity-inducing sometimes. I can see down to like 380nm from what I've noticed, and it's absolutely bizarre without my eyeglasses. I may be an artist, but you'll never catch me wearing contacts ever again after the first time I tried them... some colors are just WAY too vivid without something to filter ultraviolet.
I have to imagine Monet's life experience was not unlike Beethoven's loss of hearing. Having attained the ability to make great things, they slowly became unable to appreciate the beauty of their creations. One has to wonder what Beethoven might have composed if he were given the proper use of one ear again toward the end.
I saw this years ago. Back now because someone mentioned honeybees and UV light in the same sentence and I had to go figure out why my first thought was Monet.
Not all pigments reflect a lot of light. Some are transparent (like Monet's yellow lenses). The light you see has passed through the paint and reflected back off of whatever is underneath.
I recently had cataract surgery. And while I can't see UV light because I have a fake lens in place of the original now.. I do notice a difference in hues from my left to my right eye. Probably because my 'good' eye has a few spots already, but I hadn't been aware I was seeing such dingy whites and because of my eyes. I thought that I was seeing them just fine and I guess my brain was supplying the rest from memory of when I was younger.
This video inspired me to get the lender removed from one of my eyes so that I can see ultraviolet lol. I mean it'll be in a few years but still. I'm lowkey excited
@@MedK001 I honestly haven't thought about that in a long time. Perhaps just writing about my excitement helped me get it out of my system? Plus there's just been so much going on recently. I do still really want to see UV light, but I don't know if I'd still actively seek it out. I honestly don't know if I ever actually really planned on doing so to begin with. However I do wear glasses so if at any point I decide to get my vision fixed by getting knew lenses in my eyes, or if I happen to get cataracts like Claude Monet, it's definitely something I would like to do! Also edit to say your icon is very fitting lmao
I'm curious how his vision would have looked with both eyes trying to look at the same thing. Would one eye's vision take dominance or would his brain try to stitch the two images with different colors together?
I heard about this one before but I really don't understand it. Wouldn't this affect also the color he chose to paint with? I mean, if he is seeing all yellowish, than the paint would look yellower for that eye as well. However, when he changed his eye, the landscape got bluer but than again so did the yellower paint would become blueish. Unless he is looking with one eye and painting with the other. This would really change things because he would be looking for a yellow paint using an eye that sees mostly blue! The end result would be that for the same eye, his landscape would be extremely different than his painting. Still, this would only account for the paintings after removing his lenses...
Ok so just blue cone cells respond to ultraviolet light, does that mean if we would remove our lenses we would see it as regular blue? Or is that regular kind of blue actual mixed with other cone cells and Monet instead saw some kind of superblue? Cause if it's the second, I need to find a way to see this (that doesn't ruin my eye ideally).
i just came here from "why animals dont wear glasses" video..and even though this is an older video, it look like this guy is much older and seasoned than his future counterpart...
you think in the near future we could create an artificial lens for our eye (like an implant/replacement) that doesnt filter out the ultra violet colors?
That would be exceptionally difficult to transmit it to brain... I think you shouldn't limit yourself to ultraviolet... Why not see radio waves? Microwaves? Tho what good will that do?
I lost an eye to cataracts as a baby and have no lens in my left eye. When I take out my contact, I don't notice any difference aside from being able to see less...
Dylan Louis-elias But how does the lens block high frequency light while allowing lower frequency light? I don't mean to be rude, but you didn't actually answer my question.
higher frequencies get stopped more easily than lower frequencies. Maybe I'm getting it wrong, but I know 2.4 GHz (Such as for wifi) penetrates the brick walls of my house better than 5 GHz.
Forgive me fore the slightly morbid question, but did Monet die due to his retina getting radiation poisoning or somethings? Was the inside of his eye irradiated?
Did not know that about Monet. PBS is putting out some great online stuff now! But "very unique?" I would not expect such a painful grammatical error from It's Okay to Be Smart.
omg he sounds so much less excited in this video then on the one that brought me here
Except this isn't either one of them...
Hank or John aren't related to this guy...
nice b8 m8 @JordiSax
are you serious? there are actually 2 persons in this channel, are they twins?
wtf are you talking about
i was born with cataracts, and had my lenses removed when i was a baby. i was never able to get artificial ones put in, so i've lived my whole life seeing like monet's lens-less eye (and some heavy prescription glasses). i'm curious about how normal people see the world compared to me. i have taken colour recognition tests and scored VERY high in accuracy, so i know i see more colours than others do. it's really cool to know that even though my vision kinda sucks even with glasses, i get to see a more vibrant world. i'm an artist, too! and maybe this is why my favourite colours are purple and blue.
Wow I can't believe no one has commented. That's amazing. Yeah i could only imagine wondering what other's can't see that you can. I find all this super interesting. Makes me want to experience it. So do you have to take special care of your eyes? Like watching what drops you use or getting in pools?
@@JoeBuk724 haha thanks! and nope, eyes carry on just fine without lenses. everything is just extremely blurry, but my prescription resolves that! i'm still visually impaired, though. i have an increased risk of glaucoma and retinal detachment as far as i know, so i make sure i get my eyes checked every year, instead of the recommended 2 years.
i'm one of the last of my kind, as not long after i was born we figured out how to make implanting lenses viable in babies! the structures the lens is sewn to wasn't preserved for me though, so i'm one of the youngest people around to have this problem. pretty neat!
@@tinycatfriend Thanks for sharing! Wow that is interesting. I have to wear glasses and contacts too. Oh are contacts an option for you?
Not too many people get to say they are "the last of their kind" lol. Oh I see, they removed it all so you can't get them now any way. Well that's good you can make do with glasses
I recently had trouble with ghosting while reading text (particularly on a screen like a phone). So i can somewhat understand trying to explain to others what you (and only you lol) see.
@@JoeBuk724 i could use contacts, i just can't stand having to put them in. and considering how easy they are to lose, i wouldn't want to risk that when they're required for my everyday life. getting contacts (or glasses) replaced would take weeks or months because my prescription is so rare that not a lot of labs make it. i have every pair of glasses i've ever owned for this reason!
haha yeah i'd love to explain how i see but alas, it's all i know~
@@tinycatfriend lol It took me a couple hours to get them in the first time, I just wasn't touching my eye enough. I still have them but quit wearing them for the most part, glasses are easier lol. But i do hate how skin flakes and stuff is always getting on them. And they stick to the lens, you can't just blow them off.
Oh my, yes i didn't think of how long it must take to get special made stuff. Prob a good idea to keep the old ones around. My last ones got stepped on like Ralphie lol so I don't have those ones.
The lens on my right eye was damaged and I see everything with a blue tint with that eye now. It's kind of annoying sometimes.
For sure
I have this black floater on my RIGHTeye that sometimes tricks me thinking a bug is following me. It's terrible in white rooms.
how do you focus without lens
@Rhebucks Full swing why?
@@myMotoring he's joking
birds can also see ultra violett and the arrangement of light sensory cells in their eyes have a higher density, which makes them able to see better and they see colors stronger then we do. Having eyes like a bird would be truly amazing.
Can we just pause a minute and discuss that GIGANTIC LITE BRITE?
How much fun was that? Picture how much fun you think it was, and multiply that times 1,000.
It's Okay To Be Smart
[Jealousy intensifies]
@@besmart sigh... I’m so jealous
This channel is quickly becoming one of my favorites... I'm loving this c':
I legitimately felt sad and started crying while watching this video. I felt so bad such an amazing artist lost his talent from losing the ability to see proper colors. I really want to be an artist but I have no talent whatsoever. I admire any artist that can put their imagination to life and create a whole new world for us to see and believe.
Talent or no talent, you can still be an artist. That is if you choose to.
Wow, how incredibly interesting. PBS is getting some dollars tonight.
Awesome! No lie, our PBS RUclipss are supported by viewers like you (I've always wanted to say that)
It's Okay To Be Smart Thank you.
+It's Okay To Be Smart LOL
I love art,I love science, and when a video have both,I explode! 😆😆😆
nice video
Like you did in Hiroshima and Nagasaki I presume.
Hie5ForLifeYT Wow, that’s is just so fucked up :d
@@hie5forlifeyt112 that's too far
At my state museum, (NCMA) we have a painting by CLAUDE MONET!!! (I discovered that today at the mueseum)
Museum
Well that's settled in going to cut my lenses out
Sure, have fun. What's the worst that can happen? ☺
That would explain the lack of reply.
Nathan Lamberth at least have it removed by a professional.
Black or fuzzy? Monet could still see out of his eye, just that there was no lens to focus the images. It explains his paintings a lot. Correct me if I'm wrong, pls
coming from a person with no lenses, you dont want do do that lol
I'm just curious as to why more people didn't remove the lenses in their eyes since then?
There are other ways to repair cataracts these days, but lens removal was actually a fairly common surgery, and one that's been done since the time of the Romans. The difficult part is creating corrective lenses to still focus light on the retina.
Also, and I might be wrong about this, it might have something to do with shorter wavelength light(like ultraviolet) cause increased damage to cells, and thus would cause loss of vision long before your life would be over. I think allot of animals with short lives do not have the ultra violet lenses(birds and insects), wheres we and other long life mammals have them. I might be wrong though.
I think you're right, I may have read something on it, not sure though.
Before they were discontinued my contact lenses provided 90% UV protection.
I wonder if there's somewhere to see people's accounts on what it's like to see like that...
I once saw an exhibit of Monet's work in Seattle, but I had not idea just how amazing they were until now.
your videos are always good...but they've absolutely rocked in the last couple months! keep 'em coming!
Thank you! We have set a high bar, but that just makes me try harder
Thanks so much for this amazing perspective all due to his eyes.
that's the strangest story I've heard in a while.
I am colorblind, and an artist. It can be very difficult. My paintings look strange, I see them as beautiful, and others do too, but it makes me sad that I will never be able to show other people what I see. Or maybe more that since what I see is so different, other people don't appreciate it. I want to make art for other people to enjoy, but I can't.
Actually, I think it's more likely that your art would give those of us without color blindness a better understanding of what you do actually see. If you mix up two hues due to seeing them as equal, we may end up getting very interesting pictures with blues in place of some greens, or blacks in place of some reds, etc.
I've actually long been curious how paintings by color blind artists would look. Do you have a site featuring any of your work?
Lowraith
Two of my art teachers were colorblind. :0 One of them worked almost exclusively in red and blue and he made these beautiful "fire wheel" paintings and earthworks models.
A few of his paintings looked like this-
www.kookseye.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Saint-Pirans-Fire.jpg
He also does abstract, large scale paintings in collaboration with his wife.
I have no idea what my current teacher's artwork is like, he hasn't shown us.
What colors can you see with accuracy?
awkwardCrabwalk
I can see all colors with above average accuracy. Which is one of the reasons colorblindness fascinates me. I can't even imagine what the world looks like from that perspective. Art produced by someone with colorblindness would be a peek into another perspective altogether, and might possibly reveal some part of the workings of the brain and how perception functions.
Lowraith
I was talking to the other person, and I gave you a link to my color blind drawing teacher's artwork.
Ha, I have better than average color perception, too. I took a test once, I think I got a 98% accuracy.
they have corrective lenses for colorblind people
I got my cataract out a few weeks ago and I agree being able to see ultraviolet light is glorious and beautiful. I need to test it more but right off the bat I can definitely understand what is being described here
2:32 Half a bee, philosophically must, ipso facto, half not be.
But half the bee has got to be. Vis-à-vis, its entity.
But can a bee be said to be, or not to be, an entire bee, when half the bee is not a bee, due to some ancient injury?
Singing
Hahaha!
Eric, the ‘alf bee!
These videos are always so well donw. can't wait for the next one!
Thank you! We put a new one out every Monday
(3:12) That bee-bodied Monet (or Monet-headed-bee) with the Terminator eye had me laughing 😂😂
Correct me if im wrong, but something tells me getting your lens removed isnt exactly healthy. how did he die?
Oh, so he died from common sense. Alas, another tragic story.
Speed you deserve a pat on the back
you wasted your time asking a question in the comments instead of typing it into google.
Monet died of lung cancer on 5 December 1926 at the age of 86
This was amazing! Great video!!
As an art student and science lover, I'm glad to be here. c:
Man that was a tragic artist. Not only did he go through so much suffering and disappointment, he never got to know how unique and pretty the stuff became today.
Just amazing info trough all the episodes
really interesting information, Love Monet's work
This series has really changed over 8 years and Joe has become "jazzier".😉
How do I cut my lens out, and how long wil it take me to fuck up my eyes to blindness?
My humanities professor in college always told us that artists distort reality in order to reveal reality. Monet was truly an artist!
I remember sitting on the bus coming home as a kid. I would sometimes change which eye I was seeing in and the way his vision was makes sense. I could see more blue in one eye and red in the other. I had thought my eyes did this to get a balanced mix of color and get a proper "image" of what the world looks like.
Oliver Sacks wrote about one of his patients, who was a painter, that acquired achromotopsia. After he obtained achromotopsia and trying to paint with color, he switched to what he still had: black, white and grey. The paintings were vastly different.
Could someone in theory with todays technology replace their lense with an artificial one that allows the wavelenghs in?
U.v. Rays are highly energetic and cause damage to cells. You'd give the back of your eye a suntan....i don't want to imagine that, but, an eye patch would protect ya....mangekyo sharingan
Bk7 or fused silica lens can do it. Although modern should contain UV absorbants since it's harmful to eyes for long living species. Better idea is to modify camera to see ultraviolet.
Yeah, there are people alive today who were given artificial lenses that don't block UV light after their cataract surgery. I believe most surgeries performed today give patients UV blocking lenses instead.
@@rckli Let's just replace the entire eyeball then! Cyborg eyes!
Once we get the technology to properly map nerve endings and create a synthetic connection to a computer with them, full on cyborg eyes will be possible.
Why is this one of my most nostalgic videos now?
I definitely want to do this when im older so that I could have a glimpse of what other creatures see
wow thats crazy you guys posted a video about people who can see ultra violet light ....i was just talking about that a couple of days ago ....my left eye can see ultraviolet
That is one of your best episodes!
3:20 his violets ultra
When I was 6yo, the lens in my left eye was knocked out by a blow to the eye. Other than not being able to see clearly though my left eye, I didn't notice much until I was in high school. My friends and I would go to the local mall and one of our favorite stores was Spencer Gifts (the chain). Anyway, in the back of the store was a whole host of 'black-light' posters with a couple of black light fixtures. I found that if I closed my left eye (bad eye), and looked at the lights, they were that blue-purple and didn't seem to radiated any light at all (what I gather others see). However, if I closed my right eye (good eye) I and looked at the lights, their light was like a fluorescent tube.
Wow this is amazing! Thank you soo much!
"and thats when he became a bee."
did he like jazz?
Wow, absolutely fascinating!
That's excellent. Great Job !
This is one of my favorite IOTBS'
super awesome episode!!!
Can you please, please, make more videos articulating art and science??!!
Wait how did he know what color pigment he was using? Wouldnt his favorite blue be the same as a yellow.
They would look a bit different, yellow would be yellower and blue would be kinda white/greenish I'd think?
Bloody fascinating.
Perfect choice on the Goldberg variations as the background music.
Nothing beats the Goldberg variations anyway!
Imagine the night sky through his right eye
0:31 My internet went out the excat second the Pause screen showed up. I thought that the loading icon was in your video and not youtube not loading, lol
I can see ultraviolet, but only from very strong sources that are almost horizontal to my eye... a head CT provided the clearest I've ever seen it. and its very similar to the purple from a black light, but quite a bit deeper and with a lot of "fuzziness" that makes it seem almost dark.
Could you describe why Monet's perceiving reality and paint differs? Because logically if he perceives reality more yellow, then he will choose a color from the palette what he perceives more yello, but in reality it is exactly like the real word? :) So from this viewpoint the end result of his painting shouldnt reflect his problem perceiving colors... we should see the real colors on his painting... Am I wrong?
It's not like every paint pigment gets equally shifted to the yellow, though. It's not like blue paint would all of a sudden look yellow, it's would probably just look muted and black, or yellow-black, whereas the yellows and greens would appear closer to their natural "selves". Combine that with the fact that Monet was acutely aware of color, and would have remembered that no matter what it looks like to his eye, leaves are green and he needs to add blue to yellow to make that color, whether or not it looks right to his eye, and he could have been making colors from memory and not quite getting them "right", to us at least..
It's Okay To Be Smart Thanx, but the answer's firt half didn't describe the problem (as the color of nature and the color of the paint is shifted the same, so the painting should look like the same as nature)... The second part describes it, in the case: 1, he was painting it from memory, so didn't had reference while painting... 2, he knew it's not the natural color he is painting and he made an artistical choice to shift them to please his own eyes with memories based on his earlier (good eye) state... In both cases i feel it's more an artistical choice (If he had wanted to paint naturally, he could, but he enjoyed this new idea shifting the colors), not a disability.... What do you think?
Fine Cut Bodies I don't think the color of the paint and the color of nature would shift the same. Pigments in paint aren't single-wavelength reflectors, and a color of paint doesn't reflect light the same as a color pigment in nature. Even blue paint is a spectrum of different wavelengths from blue to red, not just blue. So let's say that Monet applied a bunch of blue paint to a mix or directly to the canvas. If that blue paint was only 5% yellow, then he could add a huge amount of it and he would only experience a tiny boost in yellow, and he would think he was painting something that was actually yellow in the scene (which would be based on a completely different natural pigment), but you or I would see blue paint. Make sense? That JAMA paper linked in description might be a good place to read for more.
Hey It´sOkayToBeSmart. Please do a video about; why animals have two eyes instead of one?
By the way, love your videos
Very interesting video! But I'm a little sceptic about the "computer simulations" of what the world would have looked like to the aged Monet. We do not yet have comprehensive models of how exactly complex vision works- so how is it possible too simulate it satisfactorily?
I linked to the JAMA research paper that did that in the description. Cataracts should be pretty easy to model, in terms of the blurriness and color shift. What is difficult to understand is how conscious Monet was of the change and whether he tried to correct it over time.
I am definitely getting a lens removed.
UV light damages cells
Ashoi F worth it
you will go blind
We are Monet of Borg. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.
I recently had cataracts surgery and the amount of colour that I can see now is incredible, I can’t believe how much colour is in the world! Before that, everything was dull and gloomy, it was horrible!
"and that's when he became a bee" I'm glad to gregor samsa is not alone in his plight. XD
Cataracts are the new existential angst.
How was he still able to see, wouldn't removing the lens have caused him to not be able to focus on things?
he still had another eye which seen clearly, but yellowish
A Buzz-Worthy Lesson in Art & Science!
2:00 there's one of them paintings in my dog's room that is almost entirely blue and it was painted by this guy
I've just found out that it's blue because it's faded
(@3:42): It would be kool to see a composite image of these two pieces superimposed together to see what the resulting combined image would look like!!
Dude being able to see a little bit of ultraviolet is insanity-inducing sometimes. I can see down to like 380nm from what I've noticed, and it's absolutely bizarre without my eyeglasses. I may be an artist, but you'll never catch me wearing contacts ever again after the first time I tried them... some colors are just WAY too vivid without something to filter ultraviolet.
Are you based in Austin? The Thinkery is awesome!
I have to imagine Monet's life experience was not unlike Beethoven's loss of hearing. Having attained the ability to make great things, they slowly became unable to appreciate the beauty of their creations. One has to wonder what Beethoven might have composed if he were given the proper use of one ear again toward the end.
I saw this years ago. Back now because someone mentioned honeybees and UV light in the same sentence and I had to go figure out why my first thought was Monet.
Not all pigments reflect a lot of light. Some are transparent (like Monet's yellow lenses). The light you see has passed through the paint and reflected back off of whatever is underneath.
I recently had cataract surgery. And while I can't see UV light because I have a fake lens in place of the original now.. I do notice a difference in hues from my left to my right eye. Probably because my 'good' eye has a few spots already, but I hadn't been aware I was seeing such dingy whites and because of my eyes. I thought that I was seeing them just fine and I guess my brain was supplying the rest from memory of when I was younger.
Ha! Just before you said "it was his right eye", I said "which one?" I swear it's true! Bonus
This video inspired me to get the lender removed from one of my eyes so that I can see ultraviolet lol. I mean it'll be in a few years but still. I'm lowkey excited
It's been a few years now. I wonder if you still want to do that?
@@MedK001 I honestly haven't thought about that in a long time. Perhaps just writing about my excitement helped me get it out of my system? Plus there's just been so much going on recently. I do still really want to see UV light, but I don't know if I'd still actively seek it out. I honestly don't know if I ever actually really planned on doing so to begin with. However I do wear glasses so if at any point I decide to get my vision fixed by getting knew lenses in my eyes, or if I happen to get cataracts like Claude Monet, it's definitely something I would like to do!
Also edit to say your icon is very fitting lmao
Plz make videos on medical biology
I'm curious how his vision would have looked with both eyes trying to look at the same thing. Would one eye's vision take dominance or would his brain try to stitch the two images with different colors together?
MY BRAND!
Anyone notice that the captions are a bit off? The timing is off
I heard about this one before but I really don't understand it. Wouldn't this affect also the color he chose to paint with? I mean, if he is seeing all yellowish, than the paint would look yellower for that eye as well. However, when he changed his eye, the landscape got bluer but than again so did the yellower paint would become blueish. Unless he is looking with one eye and painting with the other. This would really change things because he would be looking for a yellow paint using an eye that sees mostly blue! The end result would be that for the same eye, his landscape would be extremely different than his painting. Still, this would only account for the paintings after removing his lenses...
2:00.
First: happy summer day
Second: autumn morning
Third: hell
What is the difference between seeing ultraviolet light
and seeing in 4 primary colours (tetra chromacy ) ?
So could i remove one of my eyd lens and see uv rays? And would it be blury without ny lens
Ok so just blue cone cells respond to ultraviolet light, does that mean if we would remove our lenses we would see it as regular blue? Or is that regular kind of blue actual mixed with other cone cells and Monet instead saw some kind of superblue?
Cause if it's the second, I need to find a way to see this (that doesn't ruin my eye ideally).
i just came here from "why animals dont wear glasses" video..and even though this is an older video, it look like this guy is much older and seasoned than his future counterpart...
I wonder if you could get a bionic lense that does not filter the UV light. But wouldn't the UV rays damage your eyes over time?
What would happen if I chose to remove my eyes lenses, would my depth perception mess up, would everything become blurry? I WANNA SEE MORE COLORSSS
you think in the near future we could create an artificial lens for our eye (like an implant/replacement) that doesnt filter out the ultra violet colors?
That would be exceptionally difficult to transmit it to brain... I think you shouldn't limit yourself to ultraviolet... Why not see radio waves? Microwaves? Tho what good will that do?
^ First we need to invent it. Then we'll find use for it.
I remember at one point thinking that one of my eyes saw slightly greener and the other bluer, wondering if this is related
U just got a new subbed
MY BRAND
+Gag Master lol
1:36 yes thats how color works
This video has given me new respect for honeybees
Can I make a request? Can you make a video about yields good real?
What's the dangers of taking the lens off? Cuz it sounds pretty damn cool
I wear those exact glasses
Did he destroy the paintings he painted with his new sight or the ones before?
I lost an eye to cataracts as a baby and have no lens in my left eye. When I take out my contact, I don't notice any difference aside from being able to see less...
Shouldn't UV light penetrate further than visible light? How was it stopped by the lens while visible light was able to pass through?
The lens are made specifically to block out wavelengths that are not visible light, hope this helps
Dylan Louis-elias But how does the lens block high frequency light while allowing lower frequency light? I don't mean to be rude, but you didn't actually answer my question.
.
higher frequencies get stopped more easily than lower frequencies. Maybe I'm getting it wrong, but I know 2.4 GHz (Such as for wifi) penetrates the brick walls of my house better than 5 GHz.
So can I get this surgery and see in UV?
Forgive me fore the slightly morbid question, but did Monet die due to his retina getting radiation poisoning or somethings? Was the inside of his eye irradiated?
Did not know that about Monet. PBS is putting out some great online stuff now! But "very unique?" I would not expect such a painful grammatical error from It's Okay to Be Smart.
Glad you like it! Language evolves :) "Unique" has an accepted modern usage as "unusual" and doesn't just mean "singular"
we learned about Claude Monet in school and our teacher never said this.
Just realized processor-wires are like 20-40 times smaller than the colours we see. :O