Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Chicago's $8.5 Billion Mega Airport Project (O'Hare 21)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2024
- Chicago is the 3rd largest city in the United States and has the 2nd largest skyline in the United States behind only New York City! It is commonly referred to as the "architectural capital of the world" because it invented modern architecture and the skyscraper and is home to most world renowned architects, including the designers of the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world! Chicago is also a major transportation hub! It was a major railroad hub in the US during the Industrial Age and it became a major aviation hub in the Jet Age! It was also famous for being the first Worlds Busiest Airport, holding that distinction from 1963 - 1998. However, recently, Chicago's airport has fallen behind in the world. The facilities have become increasingly outdated and cannot keep up with the increase in travel. To solve these problems, Chicago must completely redevelop their major airport. O'Hare 21 is Chicago's mega project to transform O'Hare from one of the worst airports to one of the best airports in the world to compete with the amazing East Asian and Middle Eastern airports! Let's take a close look at the O'Hare 21 project.
==============================
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
1:33 History
4:59 O'Hare's Problems
6:14 The New O'Hare
10:37 Summary and Conclusion
==============================
Tags:
#Chicago #OHareInternationalAirport #OHare21 #ChicagoOHareInternationalAirport #OHareAirport #OHareAirportProject #OHare21Project #ChicagoAirportProject #ChicagoProject #MegaProject #ChicagoMegaProject #OHareMegaProject #StudioORD #GlobalTerminal #OHareGlobalTerminal #OHareAirportHistory #OHareAirportProblems #WorldClassAirport #AirbusA380 #ArchitectureCapitalOfTheWorld #BusiestAirportInTheWorld #AirportProject #FutureAirport #FutureProjects #Illinois #IndustrialAge #JetAge #GoodAirport #HowToDesignAGoodAirport #AmericanAirlines #UnitedAirlines #DeltaAirlines #Terminal #Concourse #SatelliteConcourse #NewAirport #NewTerminal #NewConcourse
==============================
Links:
Twitter - / jones_rmj
Scratch - scratch.mit.edu/users/jonesrmj/
Discord - / discord
==============================
© jonesrmj 2020
REMEMBER TO SUBSCRIBE AND RING THE BELL IF YOU ENJOY MY CONTENT! ALSO, PLEASE WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO TO GET THE BEST CONTENT! FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - twitter.com/jones_rmj THANKS AND ENJOY! ;)
Question Of The Day: What do you think of O'Hare 21?
Great video! Minor pronunciation correction. Sabre is pronounced SAY-burr, not sa-BRAY in American English.
@@brianking768 Sorry about that.
I was born in downtown Chicago and have lived here all my life. I fly out of O'Hare a lot and it's definitely in need of this massive upgrade. It's long overdue.
Agreed! I’m really excited for the Global Terminal as it will probably be the nicest terminal in the US and one of the nicest in the world!
I totally agree! These renovations will make O’Hare one of the premier airports in the world. O’Hare has always been a leader in innovation and these upgrades will make sure that tradition continues.
@@garykaplan7728 O’Hare had never been particularly innovative. That’s why it’s lag behind so much. That an local politics. The terminal renovation is only about 20 years too late and even the current plan only solves part of the problem
$8.5 billion? That is a ridiculous price tag. Heck it has taken them going on 3 years just to finish the extension and renovation of the ATS monorail (that was originally supposed to be completed by September 2019 and is still ongoing with no end in sight). Now they're promising us this new terminal by 2028? We'll be watching won't we.
@@sean2015 the monorail is complete
My preference was for the Santiago Cantalvra. That option had more green (trees) and more space for the passengers. I'm from Chicago and I use O'Hare extensively.
Great video!!!!!
Thanks! I see what you are saying about Calatrava's design, but to be honest, it was the least realistic and would've gone way over budget.
Likewise but after seeing the disaster that was the Oculos WTC subway station by Cantalvra I think his ORD design was too ambitious
I agree it looks cool but exterior green space at an airport is not the smartest idea. Wildlife particularly birds and airplanes do not mix well.
$8.5 billion is highly underestimated in costs. Salt Lake City is rebuilding its airport in the amount of $4.4 billion to serve 25 million passengers a year. Also Chicago will need to reassess the need for additional gates for the A380 as more and more airlines are dumping their A380 aircraft
Yeah. I’m definitely anticipating this project to cost a lot more too! I do like the design of the global terminal though and I hope it can improve O’Hare! Thanks for watching!
Remember who runs Chicago
We’re Americans, the costs will triple by the time it finishes 7 years late in 2035.
Not only am I concerned about cost overruns, I'm also concerned about delays in project completion. I mean for heaven's sake, the upgrade and extension of the people-mover system at O'Hare was only supposed to require eight months, and it is still not finished after 2+ years. I don't trust the city of Chicago.
@@jonesrmj most of the rent park buildings / train tracks are all ready done
I grew up in Chicago (Cicero area) and my family used to go watch planes either at O'Hare or Midway. We are moving back to Chicago this year. Thank you Chicago for expanding ORD. I used to fly into ORD when I went home to visit. :)
Nice! Thanks for watching!
As someone who works in the current terminal 2 at O'Hare, I can not wait. I am always seeing the expansion of terminal 5 and am excited to see the new changes. I hope it lives up to people's expectations. I also hope that it changes people's perception of the airport. Thank you for the video
I don't even live in Chicago and I'm very excited for the global terminal! I think it's the best looking terminal in the US! Oh, and speaking of Terminal 5, do you know how much progress has been made on it and do you know what the most updated completion date for it is? Thanks and Thanks for watching!
@@jonesrmj I don't know how e much progress has been done to terminal 5, it looks like it's on schedule though, I hate to say this but I think Covid helped it stay on schedule as less people are flying which would help construction stay on course.
I don't know if it will be better then the new salt lake city is, that is supposed to be amazing. I know LaGuardia for the limited space they have, what they have been able to do is nothing but a miracle. Even Denver and smaller station like New Orleans is supposed to be amazing
But one thing is certain, the US is airports still may be able to compete with some other countries with amenities, but they getting better at configurations for landing and taking off, more space for planes and passengers waiting at the gates, better better, hopefully better amenities, better views. Also all of this to will help passengers and employees out.
@@jamesf791 I think the Global Terminal will be even nicer than the new SLC Terminal. The Global Terminal looks like something you would find at Singapore's Airport, while SLC just looks like a modern standard US airport. That's not to say the new SLC is bad, just the O'Hare Global Terminal is world class.
Terminal 2 has needed the upgrades for the last 40 years. Looks like a dungeon especially when you leave the United section.
i like the airy design from santiago calatrava
Sorry it's been a while since I've uploaded a video! I've gotten hammered with school work and barely had any time to work on videos!
As someone who has transited through O'Hare dozens of times, with roughly half of those having 15 minutes or more of delay, I am really glad that this upgrade is taking place. Once it's completed, I will try to book more flights to experience the new set up.
Yeah, it’s definitely a much needed upgrade! Thanks for watching!
OMG! 8.5$ billion! wow! Great video jonesrmj, as always :)
Thanks Da Weather Dude! It is indeed a huge project, and I love the look of the new Global Terminal! Thanks for watching!
I like the idea of trees inside the terminal. Flying through Charlotte, with the trees and rocking chairs in the terminal make it more homey.
Agreed! Thanks for watching!
Terminal 4 was not the "old International terminal." Terminal 1 was the old international terminal. When they rebuilt it, they created Terminal 4 as the Temporary terminal.
Well yeah, but I was implying that at the time T5 was built, T4 was the international terminal.
Great video and thanks for posting. When I travel I connect often through ORD and these expansions and upgrades look nice
Agreed! Thanks for watching!
Was just there and the only thing they started is expansion of terminal 5. Rest looks old and very outdated
oThank you for the interesting and detailed information, not only about the future of ORD, but also its history. The new Global terminal looks amazing.
I was part of the production for the winning Studio design and now actually work at the airport. This is very exciting!
Could you help me find a job there? I’ve been applying for years and no luck
That’s really cool! Thanks for watching!
@@lorelei4792 look up united Ground Express It's a very easy job to start your path through working your way up at the airport
To summarize:
1) T5 is expanded. The future of Delta hub.
2) T2 is rebuild with bigger interior room and roughly the same number of gates in place.
3) 2 additional larger concourses are build connected to T2 via underground shuttles.
4) Improved ground transportation to rental center etc.
5) A useless short runway is removed to make space.
I'm excited
Nice summary! Thanks for watching!
This video makes me so happy
Once known as Orchard Field; hence the ORD tag.
Yup!
Never knew that
Orchard place. Theres a grade school named orchard place just north of it to remember.
Was it a former apple orchard?
Hi Jones, I am really glad that I was able to find your channel. Very informative content! I wonder if O’Hare really has a need for more A380 gates since Lufthansa and Air France no longer has them, and they never flew them to ORD. Perhaps Emirates could but they will retire it by around 2035, and if the market grows they would be better of by competition against Qatar and Etihad by offering more frequencies. It’ll be really cool to see Delta streamline their operations at T5 once it expands. Very good video, looking forward to more! Perhaps you could do one on LAX if you have not already done so :)
Thanks! British Airways has flown the A380 to O’Hare, and they’ve shown interest in keeping the A380 around so I think it will come to O’Hare again in the future. I also could see Emirates bring it here in the near future!
Very nice video.
Thanks!
Seeing the beginning of construction driving around the airfield is pretty cool.
Cool!
Santiago Calatrava has the best design for the new Global Terminal seconded by Studio ORD.
I’ve flown into ORD from SFO since 2018 for work, until 2020, I don’t like the United terminal as the seating area it limited to around 50 people but the jets are passenger capacity are from 150 to 300 so that doesn’t cut it.
Hopefully they solve this issue with new terminals design.
I think it will! Thanks for watching!
I’ve worked in o hare airport in 1989 . Work at host Marriott as a bus boy . I also worked as a ramp agent for 3 different companies after that . I miss that airport and I’m looking forward to the expansion.
That’s cool! Thanks for watching!
Great video! I remember flying through in 1986 when Terminal 1 was still under construction. I'm older than dirt.
That’s cool! Thanks for watching!
That wood ceiling is going to date fast. It’s gonna look like the Brady house soon.
USA3000 used to operate domestic flights out of terminal 5 at ORD between 2002 and 2009. Before obtaining a gate at terminal 3, ORD offered Virgin American the opportunity to use terminal 5 for its operations as well.
I hope O'Hare builds the Calatrava design...magnificent and truly WORLD Class.
They are not going to. Studio ORD’s design was the winning design.
I wonder about the importance of having A380 gates when most airlines are removing them from service...
These plans were finalized long before the pandemic hit. Plus some airlines are still holding onto their A380s, so you never know.
Better to have it than regret not having it.
I like O'Hare, but it's never been a destination airport, yet. I fly United a lot for my work trips and it's one I go through a lot. I've only needed to leave it once and that was December 2022. Fun time got stuck at Dulles left the next day and got stuck at O'Hare. The only drawback of being in O'Hare at the time before I got a rental car and hotel was it was cold as hell inside the airport, but that's it. Never had an issue navigating it but it helps that the flights to San Antonio are all direct and usually out of 1 terminal
The City can't get the ATS upgrade finished timely. It was supposed to be finished in 2019. It's 2021, and no one will say when the project will be completed.
So, who knows when this will be complete.
Yeah, I saw that. I wonder why it’s been delayed for so long.
@@jonesrmj everything is delayed at ord 🤣
yesterday I was at ohares terminal 5 and I saw that there already doin’ dat concourse 5 extension are ready but we couldn’t go to it so now I’m in Texas 😎👍
Nice! Yeah, the Terminal 5 expansion I think completes either later this year or early next year!
Excellent video! I have always been an O'Hare fan as I have traveled through there for decades. I am glad to see there is a real plan to improve the main terminal.
I will say that some of this may slow due to the pandemic, but not certain. I also wonder about the international terminal adding another A380-gate. As mentioned below the A380 is all but gone in today's aviation world. Sure, they still exist, but no new ones are being built.
But overall, great look at future possibilities.
Thanks! I am too very excited for the Global terminal because it’s by far the nicest looking terminal in the US IMO and looks like something you would find in Singapore! Also, it’s not only T5 that’s adding another A380 gate, but the global terminal is also adding some as well. And while yeah, some airlines are dropping their A380s, there are still some that show interest in keeping them around. I could see British Airways and Emirates bring their A380s to O’Hare in the near future as air travel recovers, and maybe even Korean Air. These three airlines have shown interest/operated an A380 flight to O’Hare before and have show interest in keeping the A380s around through the pandemic.
@@jonesrmj the only a380 gate at Ohare was built specifically for BA.
@@MikeJones-bl6lu Actually, it was built for Emirates, which had a one-off A380 visit to O'Hare in 2016 to test the new gate. British Airways though had the first regular scheduled A380 service to O'Hare, which started in 2018.
@@jonesrmj BA is still the only plane allowed to use that gate. Not that you need one for a plane that didn’t really work as well. Boeing learned from the failure of the 380 and will use folding wingtips so it can use gates that are already built.
Hopefully I will see O'Hare's new look someday whenever I come to visit Chicago, when the weather is just right.
Yep. It definitely will be a completely different airport!
@@jonesrmj It would be amazing to see O'Hare look like that when the construction is all done. When it is expected to be completed by?
@@kevinpegram262 2028 at the soonest.
Maybe by the time it’s finished Chicago will be in a more temperate climate
Going to be interesting to see that satellite terminal being added to C. I’ll miss terminal 2 however.
Definitely terminal design #5 , hands down !
Calatrava’s design definitely looks the coolest, but it would’ve gone way over budget and it’s probably the least realistic of the proposals.
The new additions look like something out of the new Cities Skylines Airports DLC
I love your lisp bro
I love Chicago!
Me too! It’s my favorite city! I hope I can live there someday!
We’re more than happy to welcome you both here :)
@@stuartlee6622 your name is Stuart your irrelevant 👩🏿🌾
How about providing an update to the O'Hare 21 modernization plans.
I did post an update in December 2021. Check my uploads.
santiago and studio are really good
I like the Studio ORD version of the Global Terminal the best.
ORD is (and always has been) huge, amazing, and challenging. It's the 1st Big City airport I ever flew into, 1st time int'l flight, and subsequently 1st ever rtn through Customs & Immigration.
Anything short of lighting my head on fire and kicking me in the ba**s will be a substantial improvement. For all the grief it's caused over the years, however, ORD does a remarkable job of pushing people through its domains. I've often seen it more as a convenient punching bag than an insurmountable disaster. STL, a much smaller airport (even in its TWA heydey) always gave me more consistent nightmares than ORD ever did. And if the City of Chicago's transformation of MDW is any indication, Chicago's ORD makeover will be worth every penny spent.
I agree that O’Hare is a great airport. I feel like all the complaints people have about an airport are because it’s big and “confusing” and think small airports are heaven. But hey, what other airport in the US let’s you fly to all seven continents? Only O’Hare! And big airports like O’Hare are much better than small airports in my opinion because you basically will always have a nonstop flight no matter where you are going, while these small airports that people love will usually require you to connect at a big airport.
For me the Number 1 feature is being able to see the planes and as much of
them throughout the airport as possible. The trees are nice also except for
when they block out the ability to see the planes.
The trees in the Studio ORD proposal are in the middle of the concourse, not against the large floor-to-ceiling windows so I don’t think they’ll really block out the ability to see the planes.
Actually, the history of KORD dates back to before WWII, with Orchard field and nearby Ravenswood airport. Neither were in Chicago. Orchard was used by Douglas during WWII to build C-54 aircraft, that then departed what was called "Douglas Field" to be used in the war. After WWII ended, the City of Chicago annexed Orchard Field, and that's when it was used as an Air Force base during the Korean War.
Back when direct flights were the norm, ORD was the busiest and most consequential US airport. But with deregulation and airlines using the hub and spoke model that's better for them, but takes passengers far out of their way, using larger, inexpensive airports way out in the country, ORD lost that volume of traffic. I can remember when flying cross-country meant taking the most direct route and setting down so passengers could stretch their legs every couple hours. That was a far better way to fly compared to flying all the way to Georgia for no other reason than the airline has its hub there, and having to sprint across miles of airport to catch a plane inconveniently scheduled to take off ten minutes after you land.
Thanks for the info!
I’ve been to O’Hare a few times in the last few years. I had no idea it was considered outdated/obsolete in terms of terminal design. Interesting.
You don't think O'Hare looks just a little drab and outdated?
@@sean2015 lmao Fr 💀
@@mblackops2 seriously it does
@@sean2015 I’m from Chicago and Ive flown in Ohare many times and it doesn’t even compare to other airports in the world. I have family in Doha, I’m actually going there next month and hamad international airport literally shits on Ohare in every possible way, it’s absolutely beautiful. Im gonna have a transit flight in the new Istanbul airport so I can’t wait to see how that looks too
@@mblackops2 you're right. Many airports around the world are far superior to even the best U.S. airport. In fact Donald Trump once talked about this when he was first campaigning for president. He made the exact same point that you've made here.
Singapore's airport for example, has a shopping mall, cinema and even an ice skating rink if I'm not mistaken.
Safe travels.
The concepts of spoke and hub operations were first tried at O'Hare. The modern jet way and multiple terminals are also firsts at O'Hare. It has more operational runways than any airport in the world and was awarded "best connected airport" in 2022 with more destinations than any rival airport. Name another airport with commuter rail, heavy rail, and a people mover.
The runway reconfiguration started well before 2016. More like 2006. 2016 is when they got the final approval on the final new runway and the extension on of another. This will be the final completion of 15+ year project. A lot of community resistance Legal fighting and funding drug it out for a long time
Yep! Thanks for watching!
Hey bro, you should give us an update on Doha's new revolutions on its airport operation system, they're expanding to ever bigger heights.
Expand I-90 first.
There is an 8-lane interstate from downtown Milwaukee to O'hare airport.
There is a 6-lane interstate from downtown Chicago to O'hare airport.
More lanes doesn’t always mean less traffic. That’s a common misconception. Take LA as an example. Also, I’m not sure they would have the space to add more lanes since Chicagoland is pretty developed especially around I-90.
@@jonesrmj Traffic flows fine until the road narrows to 3 lanes. Then it becomes a parking lot. There is space to add a 4th lane but it's being used by the train.
Wow, O’hare went from air to airports
5:23 "This actually gave O'hare... at eight runways"
I can count 10 runways on the chart :D
It might’ve had 10 back in the day, but today it has 8 runways.
@@jonesrmj But he talked about the original one.
@@dosaussiethai2127 I was referencing the wiki link which said 8 runways.
@@jonesrmj No worries. It was a lighthearted joke.
@@dosaussiethai2127 Oh ok.
it is a beautiful place.
Yes it is! Thanks for watching!
If that city Gov thinks it's going to be 8.5b it's probably going to be 10 or 11.
14 is my bet
They will probably expand even further by adding more satellite terminals because they have room to do so.
Yeah. There actually has been talk about the possibility of a west terminal in the future, but no official plans yet.
American airports look like bus stations
Yeah, a lot of them kinda do.
I live in Chicago, O’Hare needs ALOT of TLC. Midway doesn’t even have a Starbucks so this is the only civilized aviation hub in the area.
What do you mean by TLC?
@@jonesrmj tender loving care
I'm still wondering if they are going to make it possible to do international arrivals at T1 and T3 as well as international departures
Probably not. From my understanding, T1 and T3 will be pretty much exclusively domestic United and American and the Global Terminal and two new satellites will handle all international traffic (except sky team which will operate out of T5).
@@jonesrmj That makes sense. but would that mean that AA and UA wont use their widebody gates at terminals 1 and 3 anymore?
@@icedragon23472 No. Both airlines operate some domestic flights with widebodies.
One way to fix O'hare is all intersecting runways need to be closed which means 14 and 22 left and right need to go these runways intersect others and several taxiways once they are closed a new taxiway needs to be built to route traffic the new terminals.
Yep. Right now, they are reorienting the runways so hopefully that helps!
22L and 22R are staying for those days that we have strong winds out of the south due to landing crosswind restrictions on the Jets. This way operations can continue with a limited capacity during those days.
5 looks insane so I like 5
It’s definitely the coolest, but would’ve gone over budget.
@@jonesrmj Id pay a check I got them covered dont worry
Me quedo con el diseño de Santiago Calatrava. ¡Es hermoso!
Su diseño es bonito, pero lamentablemente no ganó la votación.
:""(
Very informative. Thanks for your work. The country overall needs huge infrastructure upgrades but when the top 1% who own half the wealth pay the same tax as someone making 500,000 a year your revenue to work with just isn’t there. Factor in corporate income taxes going from 35% to 21% you have major revenue shortfalls. America currently constructed financially is choking itself making our infrastructure substandard globally now and for the foreseeable future.
I definitely agree that our infrastructure needs upgrading. We are one of the wealthiest countries in the world and yet our infrastructure is very poor. Hopefully that can change in the future!
Yup
The chosen terminal is beautiful, but 'seamless travel between international and domestic flights' is offered at every major European hub: Frankfurt, Munich, Amsterdam, Zurich, Vienna, Paris, just to name those I have actually flown to/from/via. Here is to note that most European flights are regarded domestic as most European countries are member of the Schengen agreement, namely all EU member states minus Ireland, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and Cyprus (the latter four prospective members) and plus Switzerland and Norway. International travel in the airport sense is in Europe everything that goes Eastern Europe (Russia/CIS), America, Asia, Africa, so quantitive traffic divide international/domestic is roughly the same as in the U.S..
Yeah
I just talked to a United 787 Pilot who is flying to Israel tomorrow but first has to catch a flight on CRJ-550 or 700. His flight route is ORD-TLV!
Cool!
There still finishing up the runways and the people mover...
However due to Financial restraints caused by the pandemic the rest of the expansion may very well be delayed...
Yep, it might get delayed, but so far, I don’t think it has. Thanks for watching!
@@jonesrmj The money has already been allocated for the project. They have actually been able to speed it up because they can close more gates at a time. Only delays would be if contractors or engineers come from other countries like what's delayed the ATS the past year.
@@evann1619 Oh ok, that would be awesome if they could complete it ahead of schedule! Do you know how much progress has been made?
Can u create a largest Airport thing, Like the Largest City Video
Sure! That’s a good idea! Do you want largest airports by size, terminal size, or by number of annual passengers served?
@@jonesrmj If you could do all, I was thinking annual passengers served!
@@RandomNewz Ok. Will do!
Just retired from American Airlines ORD Sept,2020... Soooo glad I will NOT be there when this is going on.! :)
they finally realized that their airport is important
Lol yeah.
What's an A-380? ;)
The largest commercial passenger aircraft. Here's a link - www.airbus.com/aircraft/passenger-aircraft/a380.html
I learned a long time ago NOT to believe a word that Chicago or Illinois claims. This should have been done 30 years ago and as with everything else in Chicago will likely cost twice as much and take twice as long to deliver and will likely be underwhelming. Wish you the best.
I swear Chicago continuously throws money into projects to cater to outta towners or into projects like this where it’s a good idea but we have other things to fix in the city....like our schools & neighborhoods that are under developed
Like throw $xxx amount of millions into things that are important
Until the “urban” population of Chicago straightens itself out and stops destroying the city it’s better to spend money on transportation projects that normal, productive people utilize. No amount of money will fix the problems of Chicago until this happens. But they will sure complain and ask for handouts won’t they.
@@davidstone9467 maybe a way to “straighten out” the “urban” community is to invest in their (the community) living situation and education so they don’t destroy the city
I just feel the city wastes money in cosmetic ventures rather than something to actually fix the “destruction” of the city
I’m surprised they are still adding A380 gates as Airbus is stopping production
The plans were finalized long before the A380 stopped production.
Airlines such as Emirates plan to continue flying their A380s for another 15+ years. Seeing how they are building gates from scratch anyway, adding the extras that a super-jumbo needs isn’t really a big stretch.
interesting
The airport is already huge. Its as big as a suburb
Lol yep!
is satellite 2 a new united concourse since satellite 1 is concourse c and as i see on there at 6:29 that concourse c is getting extended gates and if satellite 2 is a new concourse for united what will be the new concourse name
No, the new satellites are for the global terminal.
@@jonesrmj but nothing happening to concourse c or is it getting more gates since it`s connected to satellite 1 what`s going on with concourse C since it`s showing as satellite 1
@@MikeTobler9624 It's just connected so that domestic and international travelers can easily transfer between terminals.
Chicago is your favorite city? In the world or US? I can see why people would like it but I’ve never actually heard someone say that.
It's my favorite city that I've been to. To be fair though, I've never been to any city outside of the US.
@@jonesrmj I've been to 10 other countries and Chicago is still my favorite city. Although it is not perfect. It can learn a lot from other cities with better walkability and increased public transit.
@@JesusDoesHisNails Nice. I personally think Chicago has great walkability, but yeah public transit could be improved in terms of condition.
You never heard anyone say that? I have lots of people
With A380’s being retired why spend the money to add all those compatible gates?
The plans were finalized years ago, so it’s too late to change plans. Plus you never know.
I liked #5 the santiago design but I am just a viewer and dont know the budget
Yeah Santiago Calatrava’s design is definitely the coolest and most futuristic looking, but it’s also the least realistic of the bunch and would’ve gone way over budget.
@@jonesrmj YUP I agree
the new modifications are interesting in terms of the concourses, however, your video didnt mention any changes to the runways which are rather complex. Im not an expert, but having a cirs cross of runways doesnt seem to be very raffic eficient
They’ve been changing the runway orientation from a criss cross to having more parallel runways. I mentioned that in my video.
@@jonesrmj I remember you saying that. What I meant was I was expecting to see the modied runway designs in the renderings.
Before they expand the airport they have to expand I-90. It's jammed up all the time because it's 3 lanes in each direction.
Yes, it was sufficient in the 1960's-1980's but woefully inadequate for today's volume.
They are building a western bypass I-490 which connects I-90, I-390 and I-294 together and eventually there will be a western access point for passengers and employee's.
@@flyerman34 The backups are the 3-LANE SECTION of I-90 when traveling west between 94 and 294. That bypass is way past that point.
Is midway still there, flew from there very tight space. Ohare been there many times,
Yes Midway still exists, but is only really used by Southwest and Allegiant. The rest of the airlines operate the vast majority of their flights from O'Hare. In fact, even Southwest has started flying out of O'Hare recently.
@@jonesrmj Midway is very busy with Southwest flights every couple of minutes. The terminal has been undergoing renovations for more than a year or so, expanding the security area. They've also started to add more concessions in the terminals. The areas surrounding the airports are filled with parking lots and garages, which are always full. It's very convenient to fly in and out of Midway for those that are on the Southwest side of Chicago and surrounding suburbs.
@@jonesrmj Ohare wanted revenue during the pandemic so they gave SWA a gate in terminal 5. Midway is SWAs busiest hub.
It is not one of the worst airports, it is quite easy to navigate and stay behind security. JFK, LAX, and Heathrow are all confused and unpleasant.
Thank you Jesus bless!
My favorite was fentress exp
why add a380 gates when the plane is being retired and no longer made
The plans were finalized long before the COVID pandemic. Plus there are still a few airlines that will hold onto their A380s so you never know.
@@jonesrmj the A380 is never coming back. people dont like hubs. they like point to point flights. the A380 is not a good point to point plane
My favorite was number 5
What do you mean?
@@jonesrmj you said pick your favorite choice for the new terminal lol I picked the last choice
@@mrrockdaddy100 Ah ok. Yeah, Santiago Calatrava's design is very nice, and I like the garden concept outside the terminal, but I'm not really the biggest fan of the few shots it showed inside. I found it way too white and open.
@@jonesrmj lol but it's welcomes you in lol it's supposed to be like that it's a airport big open space
@@mrrockdaddy100 That makes sense, but I felt like it was too open.
Interesting pronunciation of Sabre … same as Dunder Mifflin
Yeah, some people corrected me in the comments.
2:01 F-86 Sabre is pronounced Saber...like the sword...a sabre .
Yeah, somebody else told me this as well. I’m sorry I mispronounced it.
I liked the Calatrava design better
It’s definitely a cool design, but it also is the least realistic and would’ve gone way over budget.
2:00 F-86 Sabre is named after the sword, so pronounced Say-brr
Yeah, someone else already corrected my pronunciation. Sorry about that.
@@jonesrmj oh okay set, loved the video
I do welcome an update to my airport but gotta say I kinda like it as is. I know this airport, second nature. I can zip through, get to security, then realize I still have an hour or more to chill. The masses are only a distraction because they don't know where to go next. If you know O'Hare it is really easy. Leaving is even easier as long as you don't have checked bags. I live right down the road and fly out of and return a minimum of twelve times a year. The reason people hate on this airport is that they are confused and the staff is not the best. Know what you are doing. I do that in every city.
I see what you are saying, but O’Hare has maxed out in capacity and needs to expand, and some areas of the airport really need some upgrading.
@@jonesrmj terminal 2 especially. Hadn’t been upgraded since it was built.
The addition of A380 gates is a waste since most airlines have retired their A380's and 747's.
That is true, although the plan to add A380 gates was finalized well before the A380 stopped production.
I wouldn't say that it's a waste because an A380 gate often uses a MARS system that allows for the gates to service multiple aircraft when not being used by an a380 or 747. these gates can be used also on future aircraft like the 777x.
@@edgarallenhalcomb6877 Exactly.
Where the hell did they get the Money?
airline gate fees
Do yourself a favor when going to Chicago...Fly into Midway...I flew into both O’Hare and Midway...Midway is easier to get around and into the city.
I honestly think that both airports are about the same as far as convenience goes. They both are connected to the cta and both are easily connected to the city with expressways. And O’Hare has way more routes while Midway is basically just Southwest.
@@jonesrmj Don't count Southwest out - Southwest flies to a whole lot of cities, including Hawaii now, via Chi to CA. They also have international flights to Mexico and other Carribean locations.
@@arlenel9583 Not saying that they are bad, just the fact is O’Hare has way more nonstop flights than Midway, especially international, and even Southwest has started operating out of O’Hare.
@@jonesrmj Some people around this area of Midway thought that SW flying out of O'Hare would be the beginning of the end for SW/Midway. Common sense would say that it'd be awful insane to stop hundreds of flights out of Midway for a few flights/gates out of O'Hare. I don't see that happening Not sure how many additional flights SW can fly out of O'Hare because of the lack of gates available, but I'm sure there's a few people who were happy to see SW go into O'Hare. SW is a great carrier.
@@arlenel9583 Yeah, the problem with Midway is that it simply cannot expand anymore from it's current size, and O'Hare just simply has the better infrastructure to handle more flights and bigger planes. But I do recognize why some people might prefer Midway since it is closer to the southern suburbs of Chicago. I do agree that Southwest starting flights out of O'Hare doesn't necessarily mean they are planning to stop flying out of Midway, at least anytime soon. But I do think once the whole Global Terminal project at O'Hare is completed, that will add a lot more gates to O'Hare, and Southwest will have room to expand at O'Hare.
Poor timing to include better accommodation of the A380 when airlines (and Airbus) are moving away from it.
The plans were finalized years ago.
😀
A380's are going to be extinct very soon as most operators are mothballing them as fast as possible. Which begs to question why the city of Chicago would be investing in upgrading the number of jetways to accommodate this soon to be dinosaur.
The plans were finalized long before the pandemic was a thing. Plus they won't scrap it because we don't know what will happen in a year or two when its over. The airlines could pull the a380 out of the storage.
I honestly believe you will see a comeback for the A380 when the pandemic ends and millions of people desperate for travel will fly globally again.
@@MrFlyboy1313 Here's a portion of an Australian blog that confirms that the future of the A380 isn't all too rosy....... "Despite these innovations for the passenger onboard experience, orders were drying up even well before the COVID-19 outbreak. In fact, Airbus made the call in early 2019 to end production of its iconic jet sometime in 2021, after Emirates reduced a 53-strong A380 order down to 14.
The global pandemic is the final nail in the coffin for the Airbus A380. Most jets are currently grounded at the time of writing and airlines are hesitant to put a firm date to their reintroduction." www.pointhacks.com.au/future-of-a380/#:~:text=In%20fact%2C%20Airbus%20made%20the,coffin%20for%20the%20Airbus%20A380.
@@evann1619 wrong
The additional A380 gate will most likely not be needed since airlines are dropped that ugly, bloated beast like a hot potato.
Still better than that cucumber with a tumor 747
@@pawelodziomek4908 shame that cucumber was built to be a multi-use aircraft capable to land at most airports while the ugly 380 needed special runways and gates and can’t be re-used unless they do a complete rebuild of the aircraft. It was also dead on arrival. 40 years too late.
@@MikeJones-bl6lu lol. Getting offended?
@@pawelodziomek4908 about what. A piece of crap looks better then a plane that was mated with a whale. The ugliest creature in the world looks like a top model compared to the 380. The a380 was built 40 years too late and nobody wants it anymore. The 747 outlasted it.
Who is going to fund this?
Santiago Calatrava's design was better.
I agree that it was cooler and more futuristic looking, but it is also the least realistic and would've gone way over budget.