British Marine Reacts To Can America's Missile Defense Intercept a Nuclear ICBM?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- British Marine Reacts To Can America's Missile Defense Intercept a Nuclear ICBM?
Original Video: • Can America's Missile ...
Stay Connected & Support:
Support my work on Patreon: www.patreon.co...
Become a RUclips Member: / @ryanforrest1664
Content Disclaimer:
All content on this channel is meticulously reviewed before release. It is created with the utmost respect and consideration for our audience. Any reaction videos are carefully curated, featuring original commentary to offer unique insights and perspectives.
Copyright Notice:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of
How’s everyone doing?
I'm doing alright 😊
My dog died . Got noone now. Im devested
Doing great.
I have massive respect for you, and I'm going to start watching a lot more of your videos.
Doing good here in Pennsylvania. But why ur calendar say Monday September 5th
If THAAD weren't good, China wouldn't have had a hissy fit when the US put it in South Korea.
Thanks for commenting mate
Im sure the US isn't going to show the world what defenses they actually have!!
That’s pretty cool but don't let that distract you from that fact that In 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them....maybe you can hire The A-Team.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The A-team 🤣🤣
Wow the first sentence was all I needed and the theme music started playing in my head.
I pity the fool 🤣
Man you seriously got me on that one
To prove your point, on 9/11 I was in Pearl Harbor. Living on Ford Island. I had just come down stairs from my barracks room. It was about 0310 in the morning. I was planning on grabbing the shuttle from Ford Island to our building up by Schofield Barracks. The first plane had already hit the tower and we were arguing if it was an accident or not. When the second plane came into view, the argument stopped. Everyone ran for my car, piled in and we hauled ass to work before they could shut down the bases. I was also freaking out all day, because my parents were flying the same airline out of Boston to Florida. I didn't hear from them till the next day. Apparently the were taking off and got called back to the gate.
Never more thankful for a missed flight! 😅
I was at work loading hot asphalt into rail cars at the ConocoPhillips refinery here in Billings Montana.
@@saplingthrasher23 😎 Montana has some of the most beautiful pine forests in the country!
If you know US military at all, you know the importance of failover and redundancy has within the organization. This video focused on 1 system, an old system, that had the responsibility of a very specific part of ICBM defense. The entire ICBM defense is multi-layered, greatly over-redundant, and multi-faceted. Even in its budgeting, it has redundant sources, as Japan is a co-investor to US Missile Defense research. Of all the Destroyers on the East Coast, how many do you think are set up to do missile defense (MD)? The largest naval base in the world is at Norfolk, VA. You have a Destroyer base in the Northeast and one down in Mayport, FL. There are THAD bases all along the coast as well, and lots of Patriot installations, including 1 battery around the WH in DC. There are satellites already in orbit numbering in the thousands doing tasks like detection, identification, and defense. Now consider the numbers being asked to defend against. 10ish launchers in NK, less than that in Iran, China 200s, Russia sub 400 working maintained and active launch vehicles. Outside the US, the only country that is capable of multi-delivery vehicle ICBM is Russia. Russia doesn't do well with this either, as multivehicle setups are responsible for the vast majority of their failures, either in boost or in the re-entry phases. This is why the standard load for a Russian ICBM is a single warhead, with less than 33% of their ICBM capability currently being used is in a multi-warhead multi-target setup. If you know you only have 370ish launches possible in a first strike, and knowing you are not likely to survive the retaliation before you can achieve a second strike, are you going to waste a bunch of those with decoys? Suppose you look at Russia and China's recent revealings to the world on the condition of their launchers, missiles, and the failings of their other "advanced" Tech. In that case, you have to know that even if nothing was done to defend the US, the success ratio would be closer to 50% than it would be to 90% using ICBMs. The newest Russian ICBM hasn't completed a successful whole mission test yet. China's corruption had their own military estimate a greater than 40% fail rate of their systems regarding ICBMs. So a mass barrage to overload the system from China is roughly 120 missiles plus or minus 20, and for Russia, it is about 250 and that is very generous to the numbers that would work. If you look where the US has THAD and its Destroyer patrols you can see that China has a challenging route to hit US, as there are MD mission Destroyers and 3 THAD systems in and around Japan, and that is before you get to the Northwest American defense nets. Neither Russia nor China could hope to hit the US mainland with more than a few dozen warheads, which if you follow MIT's research into nuclear weapons use, you would know the area of complete death and destruction isn't as wide as most imagine. Long-term issues being removed from the conversation, short-term effects wouldn't be enough to cripple the US from making not only its retaliatory strikes(the only country who has the ability to reach the enemy confidently with its other forms of nuclear weapons) but also its ability to reload and maintain war on both a nuclear and conventional aspect. The moment that armed conflict of the levels that nukes would be involved is entered by the US, the life span of every single Russian naval asset would be measured in hours, not days, not weeks, but hours, and even a good majority of these would be measured in minutes. At this same moment, all reachable Russian air assets would be permanently grounded, and any defense system would be targeted for either a nuclear strike or a heavy conventional strike to render them inoperable for a long period of time. Any and all space assets of Russia and its allies would be made useless. These are just the things that would be done early on in the first hours of the war, unlike Russia and China, the US has a Sub force that goes undetected and has incredible stealth use in everything from bombers to fighters to attack air crafter to its missiles, rockets, and glide munitions. While the point of its effectiveness not being 100%, I think its use to render any such attacks as being pointless because of the reaction vs effectiveness, is already 100% and well worth the $ spent.
great read
"Outside the US, the only country that is capable of multi-delivery vehicle ICBM is Russia" Incorrect, China has MIRV capability.
@@rothtiberiuscain7589 Just because China claims they have this capability, doesn't mean they do. The proof is in the pudding, and the Chinese pudding still only places 1 warhead per ICBM.
That's why I think lasers are going to be the best defense against ICBM's. Nothing is faster than the speed of light...that we know of.
Patriot begs to differ.
They've really tried for many years now. It's just not there. At least not yet.
Oh yes let’s use heat to destroy a missile that’s designed to survive reentry
@@markmontagna7637 I mean, it is only designed to burn off for the amount of reentry. Any further heat would compromise the rerentry vehicle portion.
Additionally, once it gets through the atmosphere, the warhead is released and you could target it then.
The real issue is having a defense system in the area of it's target.
Even the patriot can down hypersonics if it is co-located with the target. It makes it MUCH easier for the system to target the incoming missile/warhead/whatever.
Again, the issue is having a system co-located.
@@markmontagna7637 the reason co location makes it easier, is because it essentially becomes a straight line from the missile to the target, which makes the incoming munition much easier to target, as the defense system is located in the same area.
In laymans terms, much less math and compensation if the system is co-located. We just don't have that many systems.
Carl Sagan summed it up "we are standing in a room, filled with Gasoline... One side has 5000 matches, the other has 6000...
I totally love how only GMD was talked about and no mention that's its getting replaced by Aegis, Patriot, and THAAD. All of which have proven yo be capable of Intercepting satellites.
SM3 baby, yeah!
Thanks for commenting mate
Aegis Ashore. Even Poland is thinking about getting it.
AEGIS has taken down a satellite with an SM3 missile... so if they can locate an ICBM they've got the capability for an ICBM kill. With that system in play... for example, Ticonderoga class cruisers. 13 are active, and each has 2 VLS blocks and can store/launch 122 missiles. They're not all ABM capable, so each has 2-3 dozen missiles that would stop ballistic missiles, so... call it 25, and you've got interception for 325 vehicles right there.
And that doesn't account for the same on the Arleigh Burke class destroyers and whatever other ships have VLS and AEGIS data integration.
The patriot missile defense systems, AEGIS systems and THAAD all work hand in hand also. They all have their strengths and weaknesses but combined, its the closest thing to a perfect air defense as u can get. Better than the Iron dome
Just found your channel…great stuff mate.
Remember these are all the declassified things we know about. There are hundreds of satellites we don’t know about and there are hundreds of defense systems we don’t know about.
Thanks for commenting mate
What's the x-37 really doing out there in space on those 1 to 2 year secret missions
Ryan, a missile defense does not need to be 100% to deter an attacker. While even one warhead getting through would be terrible for the defender, a major power (i.e., Russia or PRC) attack would have objectives that they consider worth the risk of retaliatory strikes. Degrade the number of targets hit sufficiently and the first strike becomes ineffective. They risk being annihilated for essentially nothing.
Academics who say it cannot be done do not seem to have suitable metrics for success in place.
The ability to strike back is all theory since its never been implemented during an actual nuclear attack. Also by the time an attack occurred what's the point most would be dead if large scale. If an enemy nation wanted to nuke the US they would first use Nuclear subs to try and stay undetected to attack the capital and any other strategic areas.
How would you stop a nuclear sub attack on the capital with hypersonic missiles being used against a non hypersonic defense? The time is cut much shorter and would likely not get detected in time. Even if it did that's pretty much the end of its target.
@@tylerbrown4074, all re-entry vehicles on ICBMs or SLBMs are hypersonic and have been for decades.
@@tylerbrown4074you do know the US knows where every single underwater vehicle is at all times correct?
@@shipness Keep believing that lol
Back in the 90s gps could show you in a whereabouts you were.
You do great work on research and explanation.
I’m happy to see you back on RUclips. I’ve watched lots and your videos and really enjoyed them.
Long story short, yes. Yes we can.
He didn't mention the THAAD which is designed to intercept missiles outside the atmosphere. They are deployed in South Korea, Romania, Israel, and the UAE. This system is designed to take down missiles before they leave the air space of the offending country and before any multiple warheads are release. That is why they are deployed close to North Korea, Russia, and Iran. Obviously the one in South Korea also has China covered which is why the Chinese were so upset by it. It's been thoroughly tested and it works. There just aren't enough launchers yet like with all these expensive systems.
There is one other factor involved with ICBMs. The Russians never figured out how to make solid fuel for their ICBMs. They still use the liquid fuel that the Americans abandoned when they developed the Minuteman ICBM. The Minuteman is always ready to go (thus the name), but Russian ICBMs must be fueled just before use because you can't leave a liquid fueled rocket sitting around for very long. The fueling process is lengthy and easy to detect with advanced satellites. That would prompt an American response. Russian tactical nukes are the dangerous ones because they are solid fueled, so the US is safe from them, but I'm afraid Europe is not. They are easier to shoot down though and Patriot was designed for that purpose.
Understand that some of the comments took away from the focus of the GMD... Iran and NK, not China or Russia.
I cant imagine the dynamics of the people , hope there are no crazies, first i heard of this.
The "Star Wars" program scared the crap out of the Soviet Union, for good reason. Would love to see you on Unsubscribe Podcast which I'm sure I've said before but it's sincere! Love and peace to you my guy!
Brother, you ask the right question, always. Referencing American ICBM Intercept Capabilities; America has a plethora of "Tools" that would be deployed, should a threat be considered credible. In short, if not destroyed outright, the ICBM would be effectively disarmed internally, in flight. Simply stating, there is a 1.3% chance of penetration, and a 0% change of detonation on an intended target. This being said; The American Counter would be exact and overwhelming; this means, the launch location of each ICBM, would receive an Atomic, Thermonuclear, Hydrogen, Neutron or EMP response, at roughly the same time the sky above the aggressor would be seized. With-in 12 hours, a 360 degree noose would begin to close the land portion of the aggressor, with-in 96 hour from this point, American families and other organisations would begin sending aid to all injured parties. Soon after, a few countries may find an increase of geographic borders and map changes.All in all, it would be a terrible week.
We love our British brothers and sisters!
Maybe we can't stop them all, but remember: The research continues.
Ryan
Back in the day 1993, I was a weather guy in the USAF, and I was doing Army support at Fort Drum for my first assignment. My second was Shemya Island, now known as Eareckson AFS, and yes, the 2 by 4-mile island about 200 miles from Russia and the home of the Cobra Dane Radar. I was not supporting that directly but the Cobra Ball aircraft as a weather observer. Yes, a cool assignment, but the only way on and off was basically aircraft. I spent 11 months on that small island. It wasn’t horrible, but it was definitely a remote assignment.
Thanks for your service mate
Strange, they did not go into our energy weapons. We went in the direction of energy weapons because we needed to combat hypersonics. Our six Gen fighters will have energy weapons as well as the Gerald Ford Aircraft Carrier has it already.
Icbm defence will be directed energy aka laser and microwave weapons. Interceptors just put on a good show, make folks "feel" safe, and get the attention of the opps on interceptor R&D.
GMD is only one system, and designed for a specific stage in the flight profile of ICBMs. In the US military, especially in the Navy and Marine Corps, we go by two is one and one is none. Put simply there are layers and other systems that can be used, and we are working on integrating the whole kit and kabootle. For example our destroyers are capable of intercepting during the boost and coast phases of ICBM flight with SM-3 missiles. Just for fun, and to prevent a major hydrazine issue with a dead satellite, a navy cruiser the USS Lake Erie shot it down with one shot. (It is important to note special software patches were needed to go after the satellite since shooting down satellites is a huge international issue. The US had to present the case to the world to do it before hand, and remove the software after the mission was over. This all happened in 2004.) The missile used was an SM-3, which uses a kinetic kill vehicle to intercept the target.
Now they have the SM-6. It just gets better and better over time.
Don't forget the new Lazer system we are deploying, they can shoot into space.
😎
Thanks for commenting mate
Ryan,
As always I noticed your video as a thumbnail and I had to click!! For my entire life this nightmare has been hanging over our heads. I never had to practice the nuke drills in school. Getting under your desk might help. But we are talking about nukes. Close is all you need to mess things up!! Big boom!! He said SDI my friend. That is the famous Strategic Defense Initiative. It is often credited with helping to END the cold war. Russia could NOT match SDI. Plus they never had the economy. Other than their sale of arms, they had little to offer. Nowadays they peddle resources. And are led by an insane man!! I had an uncle that was in the Air Force and served in Alaska on that early warning system. He told me guard duty was a bitch! So COLD!!!!
The distance from Pearl Harbor to North Korea is 7,204 km. Or 4,476 miles. That is a long-ass trip. Better have some snacks. Ryan as you know the US of A is a system based on capitalism. We like to spend money! And we spend massive amounts on defense. We have several treaties we intend to honor! The U.K. is only one of several. The one that catches my eye these days is with Taiwan. Red Chine likes to act like a bully and rattle their saber. And there are a lot of them (people). I may be wrong, but the Russian military is not as tough as everyone thought. (Ukraine???) I wonder if communist China is the same way? I will admit that red China has a much better business model than Russia. They are one of the U.S.'s biggest trading partners. This stuff is way beyond my pay grade. Thank you Ryan.
Only need to defend for less than 40 minutes the country sending them will recieve them asap
Iron dome is meant for rockets, not ballistic missiles.
There is what the US publicly releases, vs what it actually has/does. Js......
Also remember, the US has many "test ranges" for missile "training". You really think they don't have active interceptors on site as well?
Thank you!
If you want to know how the patriot and himars work should watch HLC (Habitual Line Crosser) that was/is his job in the Army
He's legit and his teaching style is similar to The Fat Electrician. Great guys!
✌️😎🇺🇸
This is ancient tech......you might check out how we can shoot down missles with a 25 cent laser blast😮
As someone who's ex Army and worked as a bouncer for 20 years. I like the analogy about yeah sure 90% of time we aren't doing anything but when stuff pops off you're glad we were there. You pay for peace of mind and for the worst case scenario not happening.
I'm also former military police and am currently a bouncer of over 30 years and a self defense instructor. People almost never appreciate safety
Thanks for commenting mate and for your service
@@RyanForrest1664 back at you brother
I live clsoe enough to vandenburg to se the sapce x launches go off into space and its very cool i hope i dont see 100 go up at once though
Am I the only one who interpreted the Pentagon’s challenge to reconsider those claims as 100% a threat 😂
They didn’t get money and weren’t wrong, they were visited by men in black suits who told them they better take it down or they would be eliminated!
Unfortunately there's no such thing in life that's 100 percent. Also these groups and individuals that are severely critical with their assessments are highly against defense spending. I get it, you want the most bang for your buck, but I would rather have a system that's 50 percent than nothing at all. Like you said , security is expensive and there's no easy way around that fact. Furthermore, trying to predict exactly what would happen and how it would play out if the button is pushed is merely just speculation. So doing something now is better than doing nothing or waiting for something better to be developed decades from now. It's all about deterrence.
It's crazy all these missiles Isreal iron dome was crazy to see when Iran attacked them
Thanks for commenting mate
Nukes dont need satellites
Scott Ritter don't think so 🥴🍺😄 . New subscriber 💯
Chuck Norris will easily take all the nukes down, just by glaring at them...Right after he comes out of the warehouse full of ninjas with throwing stars and shinobigatana and multiple people with machine guns. 🇺🇸
This is also misleading. There is the GMD, THAAD, Patriot, lasers, aegis with SM-3, aegis ashore, etc..... this is just what's publicly available.
Well that's nice to know I live twenty minutes from one of two GBI sites, the one with forty missiles.
Might not be nice because bad guys going to be gunning for them missiles sites with missiles
Love the video, your algorithm is the same as mine lol. I'm subscribed to this guy. Just watched this video. I enjoy your take on reaction videos.
Welcome aboard!
Well we do have a satellite for every country....
Our military doesn't rely on GPS anymore, and hasn't for a while. Don't get me wrong, we still use it for almost everything but our high-end missiles use star charts. We did this so we could destroy satellites and not degrade our defense.
I think your right about the US saying that their missile defense isn't good publicly I take that as them trying to lure enemies into a false sense of arrogance such as north korea
The 95-99% iron drone rate was on purpose. Some projectiles they deemed would not hit a populated area so they didn’t target them and let them through. Not 1 projectile hit where human life was in jeopardy.
Thanks for commenting mate
Ours and yours is just to mitigate collateral damage. But shit hits the fan, covers taken off. Well im old
Usa shot down their own satellite! Back when i was a kid
Regarding iron dome…you say it needs to be 100%. I disagree…think of all the lives that were saved with the 98-99% success rate.
Since Israels arrow worked on icb height missiles from iran, usa should test and buy that.
Another important factor is that Russia may have 6000 ish warheads but probably less than half of those are deployed. A fraction of deployed warheads are on ICBMs. A lot are gonna be typical gravity bombs or tactical nukes. There is also a failure rate that will take out 10% or so.
Point is that Russia isn’t launching thousands of nukes at the USA and the USA is big af.
Of course we can but decoys and ECM etc. will overwhelm air air defenses.
Of course they admitted that i mean look at the incompetence of washington
So they use decoys and we send real ones? Ok
Im 53 it was still a thing.
I thought there was an anti-ballistic missile treaty? how did I not know the U.S. pulled out of the treaty? Oops. I do subscribe to Task and Purpose but somehow missed this.
Hey, Ryan! Been a while! Life's been good, yet very busy. I'm glad you're feeling better and have new projects goin on. Sending my love to you and the family.
If you'd like more info, check out Habitual LineCrosser. He's a former Army tanker(19K) and a current Patriot System Operator/Maintainer?(14E). He also teaches Patriot at the senior level and is quite good at it, hence his channel name lol
His explanations of the history of air defence and missles, along wth the how and why really makes it easy to understand. Of course, certain things he can't discuss, but, as we know, our capabilities are probably better than what you'd learn from Wikipedia.
😏
Also, his Green Screen playlist is a current event circus and definitely worth a look!
🤣
Peace✌️😎🇺🇸🇬🇧
Funny, great system. Can’t track a Chinese spy balloon
Were never going to tell the world everything that we have. I assume we have even better systems than this.
If it comes down to this canada is getting a few , mexico and south america. Just for shits and giggles.
and just think our satellites are armed also with MOAB missiles
Let’s just put it this way the people that give their their thoughts on the system. First of doesn’t know anything about it quite frankly most of United States or all the people in the United States. Don’t know anything about this type of system. Just because you haven’t heard about whether it works or not doesn’t mean that it doesn’t, but here you are spilling everything all over the Internet. There’s a lot of things that you don’t know about their country and what their abilities are or able to do. Just keep that in mind people having an opinion opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one.
Lol your choice you effed up. Alaska or greenland? Um i dunno maybe greenland
That's where lasers come in!
gotta remember , the bad guys never follow the rules
Thanks for commenting mate
Oh salt and salt 2 whatever. Loophools
This seems like a conversation about having an old condom in your wallet. You don't think about it much, but you really want it to work when the time comes in more ways than one and for a variety of reasons. 😅
These are all scary
"Shall we play a game? How about Global Thermonuclear War?"
Joshua: "Wouldn't you prefer a good game of chess?"
-War Games
On that hawaiian base who better than to want to keep living. A ahit paid soldier or a highly paid government worker.
its sad. we would be a multi-planetary species by now if we allocated money towards science versus weapons of war. oh well. too bad we're a violent bunch. US Army vet here. love your channel.
The USN's Aegis radar and ship launched Standard SAM system are another mobile ABM combo that have destroyed satellites in orbit in tests, and could likely target slower ICBMs mid-flight. Problem is that any ABM system can be saturated, with results beyond catastrophic.
Good vid brotha
Thanks for commenting mate
I believe the USA now have the ability to track and guide without satellites
I'd also like to see as the lazer weapons technology develops . An eventual multi orbiting lazer array system that can take out enemy missiles from space as well as enemy satellites blinding them to ours. I'm hoping that this is under consideration if not development.
Good ole T&P video! LET'S GOOOOO
Hi, how are you Ryan.have read that the us only has 400 or so ICBM interceptors in inventory, that's with a 45% hit rate. T there are lower altitude ( patriot, iron dome ) the hit rate for lower altitude is much better but still can't get them all. The book in your video you should read it.were I got the interceptors info from
You don't know what you're talking about.
You realize this is talking about one specific system that does one specific job. Not to mention the US military isn't just going to give unfiltered access to its missile defense doctrine and systems to someone writing a book. They aren't telling anyone everything they have. Of course, as is said multiple times in the video, no system is 100% foolproof. That is why they have multiple layers and overlapping systems to be as effective as possible. It's like the old saying: better to have and not need, than not have and need...
On 9/11 I was in a recovery room recovery from a Gun shot wound to the stomach. Before anyone starts with why I got shot, I am a retired police officer and paramedic and on the day I got shot, we were running a search warrant and I got shot by what we thought was a victim but was one of the suspects.
An f 16 can intercept an icbm
One point of hope is the U.S. militaries development of Lazer technology weapons systems. They have already deployed working lazer weapons on some U.S. ships and have demonstrated them successfully in destroying airborne objects as well as objects on the surface of the sea.
We can only hope that the technology develops even further into the ballistic missile defense system. Then there would be no limit on how many missiles that the system could engage.
Hey bro !
Gotta say it: but a balloon can just wander across…
That was on purpose. They wanted to let it do its thing then grab it and see what China was capable of finding out
Thanks for commenting mate... and true haha
The idea of stopping a icp which goes hemspere level of travel which makes it harder to track once its launched
The fact that this guy was 11-12 when 9/11 happened & I was 7 so he’s only 4-5 years older then me is insane 😂 thought he was like 40
Excellent reaction. The one thing I would note is that America would say what the capabilities are of our KNOWN weapon systems. Unlike Russia, North Korea, China, and Iran, we do not inflate our capabilities of our weapons' as we are a Democracy, and not an Autocracy. Understanding our deficiencies is what forces us to improve upon them to make sure we are sending our children into battle "God Forbid" with the best kit and supply logistics that we possibly can have. America's military is all volunteer, and is very dear to the people. A sense of pride to know that we stand watch, but these are our children, fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, etc... They must have the best that is available. I know other democracies feel the same as well, but we are definitely not like the Russians who do not mind sending waves of their people to die and not caring about it. The US is a democracy after all.
Why didnt Bush go to prison
Now remember, if this is now common knowledge on the interwebs, what do we not know about that they are capable of🤔👍🇺🇸🫡
I’m kind of thinking that the United States isn’t EVER going to show its hand. Is Russia, China, or other adversary going to see who blinks first?
Beard looking good!
Thanks man
Agreed... Also at the beginning of the video Ryan states how the American Military stuff does pretty well on this channel 0:21
I think I know why (at least for myself). My top 5 reasons for watching would be:
1. You don't just re-act you also engage your audience.
2. You actually have a military background to draw experience from.
3. It's good to get an outside of the U.S. perspective. This makes you slightly better than some American you tube channels.
(Americans complimenting American capabilities is like somebody's mum cheering for them at the big game. It's nice to see, but it is also well know that those cheers are *Heavily Biased* LOL! )
4. Awesome sense and use of humor!
5. The beard is pretty awesome, don't ever change it 👍👍👍
So who should I listen to you or the show you shouldn’t put your 2cent in unless your sure
This is an old video. And also, I love the smarmy remarks from Britts on the US Military. We are spending money to defend the USA, while the UK is shrinking it's military. You can sense how much they hate riding our coattails.
The true reason we have so many nuke$ is not what people think. The VAST majority of them are Hydrogen and have almost no fallout/ radiation compared to older Plutonium/ Uranium versions. The reason is weight, and yield. So, if you are super rich or world leader, you prob have a bunker that allows survival.
Let's just hope none ever get launched