Saw this video on my home page and decided to check it out. I only have one copy of AWNW and no Giant Tinks and no Cogsworth. Do you think there are cheaper options to work with? Like 2-cost Noi for example?
Thanks for giving it a chance! It can definitely function without AWNW and Cogsworth, if you want it to stand a chance against very "meta" decks though it will be hard without Tinker Bells and some higher cost cards. If budget is an issue I would consider trying maybe Amethyst/Emerald Aggro or Amber/Emerald Discard, they have more flexibility with low cost cards :)
@@zerotheherolorcana Yeah there are certain cards that I still don't own yet... Funny thing is that I can ALMOST build the deck card for card per your deck! A couple cards that I've considered throwing in while watching the video are these: - 2 Aurora Dreaming Guardian so that everyone on board gets Ward - Avalanche since Giant Tink is out of the question - Dreamborn Steel Simba - Noi since he gets Ward AND Resist +1 whilst an item's on board I'll see how I build this deck
@@maugzsr556 Nice! Yeah this isn't the final build of the deck, I'm still trying different pieces and am playing around with Avalanche and Simba too :)
That is a weird line. Wouldn't you want to OJA on t2 and then on t3 drop quill ink and use quill and then with 2 extra ink play scuttle? Maximizing ink growth and tempo? Playing scuttle on 2 seems bad imo
@@maxwellschwartz1299 So following your line, you end turn 3 with 5 ink and a wet Scuttle. With my line, I end with 5 ink and an exerted Scuttle, but I also had 1 ink unused, so if Scuttle had hit Pawp or if I already had one in hand I would get to play that too, so more tempo. If I was worried about opponent challenging Scuttle like if they played Mim Fox or Smee then I'd be more inclined to play your line for sure :)
I wouldn’t call this a Bucky killer just based off this. Your opponent is playing a jank version with Prince John’s. And he also never even had Bucky on turn 2.
I'm being presumptious for sure haha, I will say in my prior testing too I like the matchup! Will have to see how it fares in the upcoming store championships!
Just found your channel, I LOVE Table top Gameplay & both mats/Players are on the 1 Camera, much easier to keep track, I like the efforts 👌
Thanks for the kind words! Good news for you, I have more coming up so stay tuned :)
Keep posting these and ill keep watching. On my other channel I'm about to start doing this too at league
Thank you so much! Love to hear it, the more the merrier :)
Saw this video on my home page and decided to check it out. I only have one copy of AWNW and no Giant Tinks and no Cogsworth. Do you think there are cheaper options to work with? Like 2-cost Noi for example?
Thanks for giving it a chance! It can definitely function without AWNW and Cogsworth, if you want it to stand a chance against very "meta" decks though it will be hard without Tinker Bells and some higher cost cards. If budget is an issue I would consider trying maybe Amethyst/Emerald Aggro or Amber/Emerald Discard, they have more flexibility with low cost cards :)
@@zerotheherolorcana Yeah there are certain cards that I still don't own yet... Funny thing is that I can ALMOST build the deck card for card per your deck! A couple cards that I've considered throwing in while watching the video are these:
- 2 Aurora Dreaming Guardian so that everyone on board gets Ward
- Avalanche since Giant Tink is out of the question
- Dreamborn Steel Simba
- Noi since he gets Ward AND Resist +1 whilst an item's on board
I'll see how I build this deck
@@maugzsr556 Nice! Yeah this isn't the final build of the deck, I'm still trying different pieces and am playing around with Avalanche and Simba too :)
That is a weird line. Wouldn't you want to OJA on t2 and then on t3 drop quill ink and use quill and then with 2 extra ink play scuttle? Maximizing ink growth and tempo? Playing scuttle on 2 seems bad imo
@@maxwellschwartz1299 So following your line, you end turn 3 with 5 ink and a wet Scuttle. With my line, I end with 5 ink and an exerted Scuttle, but I also had 1 ink unused, so if Scuttle had hit Pawp or if I already had one in hand I would get to play that too, so more tempo. If I was worried about opponent challenging Scuttle like if they played Mim Fox or Smee then I'd be more inclined to play your line for sure :)
I wouldn’t call this a Bucky killer just based off this. Your opponent is playing a jank version with Prince John’s. And he also never even had Bucky on turn 2.
I'm being presumptious for sure haha, I will say in my prior testing too I like the matchup! Will have to see how it fares in the upcoming store championships!