Hi, could some one help me to summarize how the Dark Sky sounds compared to the IE900? Unfortunately there are no review of the Dark Sky in English yet. Thanks a lot!
Vocals are more forward in Dark Sky with more bottom end than IE900. Whereas IE900's monitor tuning is more balance in all frequencies than Dark Sky. Depends your listening preference, I would say go for Dark Sky if you favor vocal-forward or Groovy music. As a drummer, I also found the Dark Sky has a very realistic sound of the bass drum via my iem system which I prefer it for stage monitoring. Yet, I would definitely go for IE900 for studio monitoring or causal listening as I focus more on instruments rather than vocals. Hope this help and thanks for watching.
我對IE 900及IE 600 嘅聽感嘅，我都係用shanling m3x原裝綫3.5試
首先ie900及ie600兩款耳機都唔算難推，3頻表現可以話係平均，低頻表現ie900嘅打擊力會比ie600較為重，兩款都屬於少下潛，中頻表現兩款人聲表現較為中後人聲偏少少冷，人聲表現上黎講兩款耳機都屬於中性表現，高頻上黎講兩款耳機都唔刺耳，整体上都算係清聲，兩款耳機嘅對比度都算不錯，而兩款耳機分別在於分析力樂器及音場，ie900嘅分析力當你聽一d大棚野時，係一個單動圈黎講，可以聽到樂器係有層次咁表現都尚算唔錯，而ie600則明顯聽到樂器係無咁有層次去表現到出黎，並且音場ie900會比起ie600闊，ie600音場會比較窄
耳機閒人
IE 900 用什麼型號的dap來推會比較好？ 來較充分表現出耳機又不是太貴的， budget可能五千左右
其實有二千幾的會更佳
Heard Turii, 1697 ti, Oriolus Isabellae, Dunu Zen, VR1, FD5, QDC Dmagic.
My favorites are the VR1 and Turii.
我已經入手了ie900，煲左一個星期左右，相比以前的800人聲係明顯靚左好多，對於中意聽樂器的人來講係一個好的選擇
冇試800, 但就咁900已經好好聽 :)
@@Kuloming 請教師兄IE900入邊的三條線應該點選？
@@ziwahlam5016 好簡單, 睇下你嘅播放器係咩, 我地音樂人多數揀3.5, 但耳機發燒友就平衡 4.4 或 2.5 啦~
@@ziwahlam5016 如果係聽音樂既話肯定係4.4，分析力會提升一個檔次。
我揀左IE900, 佢有種少有嘅正氣。
係好鬼標緻嘅~
唔算發燒友但又有些小要求，只會聽流行曲，情歌多，預算2000至5000有咩好推薦
Mest mini
i430
aaw a3h+ noir
可唔可介紹下dap同耳機既配搭？中高價耳機 配 咩價錢dap 會性價比高？
你用邊款耳機？
如果聽交響大棚野，邊隻推介？
大耳牛🤣
IE900好d
下次試埋水月雨光Illumination 同埋Dunu Zen
有機會試下先
我想問有冇啲平啲嘅IEM介紹/推薦for唱歌 因為第一次買唔想太貴 麻煩曬
大概幾錢budget?
1千會唔好難 因為我想搵啲貼耳形繞耳嘅IEM🙈🙈🙈
Forest Max 會幾難下⋯我地都會建議aaw A3H+或UM 3DT HK special+，約千幾至二千幾左右⋯
@@LokWoodTao 如果Fender nine 1/0係咪會無咁好？
單動圈 有冇試過Dunu Zen? 達音科 禪
有機會試試～
單圈力推Technics tz700
呢隻都想試下
有dark sky 既我都買左tz700 依隻野好堅
我放了dark sky 之後都入了tz-700.現找升級線中
單圈推softears turii
請問兩位如果想聽女聲爵士,萬五蚊樓下有乜嘢耳機推介🙏🏻
Sony Z1R ，1697ti , Tz700 ,dark sky , aaroma w6.2
唔該
純粹想交流下聽感
本身聽過1697有興趣，但覺得低頻算少，雖然未到FWW個種，但IE900既低頻會再少過1697？(唔知邊道有得試聽)
IE900低频非常控制的，听上去比1697少。但是声场很大
3對都聽過 以單圈黎講 我反而最鐘意Fiio FD5
試下先~
绝对同意
初時買FD5主要用黎聽藍牙手機之類粗用, 點知而家變咗主力聽佢, 對westone打咗入冷宮.
Hi, hope you could do a comparison of the IKKO OH7.
Let see if we can try this :)
用緊1697TI，想請問如果想換升級耳線，用返acoustune原廠ARS132與小許Silence Black比較，邊條會更適合？
真係要試吓先知啱唔啱你～
Silence Black有得試聽？
Wai Ming Lau facebook.com/groups/recycleaudio/ 可以入去聯絡小許
Hi, could some one help me to summarize how the Dark Sky sounds compared to the IE900? Unfortunately there are no review of the Dark Sky in English yet. Thanks a lot!
Vocals are more forward in Dark Sky with more bottom end than IE900. Whereas IE900's monitor tuning is more balance in all frequencies than Dark Sky. Depends your listening preference, I would say go for Dark Sky if you favor vocal-forward or Groovy music. As a drummer, I also found the Dark Sky has a very realistic sound of the bass drum via my iem system which I prefer it for stage monitoring. Yet, I would definitely go for IE900 for studio monitoring or causal listening as I focus more on instruments rather than vocals. Hope this help and thanks for watching.
Thank you very much for the info! With that, I’m wondering which one has better soundstage and imaging? (BTW, is that X JAPAN t-shirt :D)
@@ngminh8895 I think IE900 is better in this aspect~ And yea, Siu Hui was wearing a X-Japan Shirt. :)
IE900 條線質地似唔似E5C咁絀？
應該唔同物質，邊條絀d真係唔太記得
btw小許話應該ie900絀d
幾時有DAP大比拼？😆
有無乜野建議？搵邊幾部比拼？
@@LokWoodTao 中，日，韓各1
平民少少10ｋ至20ｋ
有冇得諗
@@baobaohong212 我地係離地系音樂人，大家會唔會鍾意睇最貴個d比較？wahaha
@@LokWoodTao 諗起都興奮👍
正呀~
me gustaría que se produjeran subtítulos
有平價監聽耳機介紹嗎？
Budget幾多?
@@LokWoodTao
一千以下
JorjLien Chong IEM諗唔到有乜好選擇⋯headphone可以試下呢對hi-x50，通利做緊特價，啱啱合乎你預算～
JorjLien Chong www.tomleemusic.com.hk/products/austrian-audio-hi-x50-professional-on-ear-headphones
@@LokWoodTao
好型嘅🎧，thanks.
聽講冠佑用IE8, 對比下IE900 下個圈咁細真係比下去…
IE8 正呀, 仲有得調音~
我觉得你们少了一条参数，就是佩戴的舒适度。IE900绝对是最舒服的，这条也非常重要。
下次會留意，不過配帶感相比聽感更加過人化，除非機身特別巨大，一般都不會不舒適～
唉...唔想提「神圈」兩字，會諗起早兩年都係佢牌子果隻
的確又有好多朋友鍾意…今次Dark Sky 好聽左好多。BTW, thanks for watching, 都有睇你啲片 :)
@@Kuloming 感謝🙏撐你地既片👍
@@113usic 支持！見到面再吹水 :)
IE900難推及不是我杯茶！
咁有無試過另外兩隻？
@@LokWoodTao 我這窮L無謂吧！
@@PaulHung158 無話窮唔窮，最緊要搵到自己心頭好~
D聲比較喜歡ue5及jh7!
萬元級國磚大部份唔落Amp 都推到嘅
唉...睇到咁評耳機,真係無野好講
我哋叫耳機系音樂人，一直以小許作為專業耳機維修師，同鼓佬明作為活躍鼓手+耳機玩家角度出發，分享吓音樂人對不同耳機嘅睇法，可否分享吓點解令你失望？歡迎賜教～
@@LokWoodTao 我知道你地係耳機音樂人，我知道你地有一個代表專業d嘅代表，另一個就單純鼓手以及玩家啲身份，不過單以你講一句"只有一個動圈好聲極有限"，就已經可以知道......唔講喇，單講頻寬，一個動圈所能夠做到嘅闊度，一般都可以頂到好幾個動鐵，最初動鐵耳機主要用作監聽，因此唔需要咁闊，你話你係一個音樂人 ed野你可知嗎？
Raymond tam 我哋嘅原意係，怕有啲朋友見慣耳機好多單元，以為單位越多越好，其實簡單一個單元都可以好好聲，先有神圈呢個主題，從來冇一個單元唔好嘅意思～我哋嚟緊有條片會講返專業音樂人，反而追求少單元，都係講呢個概念，敬請期待
@@LokWoodTao 明白 原來係我誤解左，sorry, 不過今時今日玩耳機真係唔係越多單元就越好 好講個人聽感同埋調音
Raymond tam 唔緊要，嚟緊會有專業樂手分享，佢會講點解有18、12單元唔要，偏偏揀4單元～的確係！我哋從來唔敢以專家自居，聽耳機同音樂口味一樣，真係個個都唔同，我哋嘅意見只係少少參考，一直都強烈建議，耳機一定要自己親身試～希望你會繼續支持我哋，有乜意見都可以繼續同我哋講～