Its crazy that she says that she doesn't know how any artist can create without knowing first of Nauman's work. as if us all would have the privilege of western art universities and "knowledge" as those institutions intend it. its quite ableist. lemme tell you, you are valid, and your art is as well, even if you don't know who Nauman is. Keep going!
Why so defensive, mate? Stop feeling victim. You don't need any universities and privileges to have any knowlege about art if you've got internet. You may of course go without knowlege but you can reach deeper going with them, that's all. Ignorance isn't an advantage
cette femme n'est pas une artiste. Ce quelle fait est juste moche, ridicule et aucunement artistique. Si l'on doit soit méme imaginer ce que l'artiste a voulu montrer alors c'est raté.
Its crazy that she says that she doesn't know how any artist can create without knowing first of Nauman's work. as if us all would have the privilege of western art universities and "knowledge" as those institutions intend it. its quite ableist. lemme tell you, you are valid, and your art is as well, even if you don't know who Nauman is. Keep going!
Why so defensive, mate? Stop feeling victim. You don't need any universities and privileges to have any knowlege about art if you've got internet. You may of course go without knowlege but you can reach deeper going with them, that's all. Ignorance isn't an advantage
cette femme n'est pas une artiste. Ce quelle fait est juste moche, ridicule et aucunement artistique. Si l'on doit soit méme imaginer ce que l'artiste a voulu montrer alors c'est raté.
woah, that's pretty strong there buddy. Hold your horses, I don't think it's wise to think you can understand and judge every artistic position
Must be so nice to be born rich.