Great to see more people using the GX9. I love my GX9 and I use it mostly with Nocticron and Olympus 75/1.8. My wife has a G9 and we also have a Lumix G800 and some other Lumix/Leica and Olympus lenses. We share lenses. The system is great. I am a GX9 fan. Thanks for the this video.
Thanks very much for this and your other recent videos about the GX9. It's great to see this fine and often overlooked camera being reassessed and appreciated in 2022. Since getting out and travelling more again following the relaxation of COVID restrictions I have also found that, whereas I previously relied on my G9 for more serious shooting , my GX9 has come back into its own and become my go to camera. As you say, a key element in this its lightness, flexibility and all-round ease of use - it's great not to have that weight and bulk to drag around, especially as I get older. I've also significantly reduced use of my older, heavier (7-14mm and 14-140mm) zoom lenses in favour of the light, sharp and fast Panasonic 15mm and 42.5mm primes. I do a lot of urban landscape and documentary photography so I've just ordered the new 9mm F1.7 to add to the set and I'm looking forward very much to combining that with the GX9 when it finally arrives.
Hi Bob, exactly the same experience here. Having used gh2/3/5, GX7, Gx80 - with plenty of M43 lenses (not to mention film Nikons Pentaxes and digi Nikons). I bought some months ago GX9 - and I love it. I tend to use zooms in the past, not anymore - because small primes 1,7/20, 1,7 42,5 are so wonderfull and performing. With new AI based NR solutions (Topaz and ON1) my action ratio reaches easily 12800 ISO (even 25600 is still usable) especially when shooting RAW (as I always do). Urban, street photography, differnet types of action/documentary - wherever small form factor and inconspicuousness is a must - GX9 is just fantastic. Now looking forward to new Summilux 1,7/9mm - within couple of days - hopefully -will be here. Saying M43 is dead is similar to saying Cameras are dead - because of Phones (which I like BTW - HUAWEI). 😀
I just came upon this video as I'm re-confirming my commitment to MFT...largely for the reasons you share. I've never been one to get caught up in the latest and greatest technology, but instead look hard at what will work for me and my artwork/photography. I shoot MFT not only because of the size (form-function, ergonomics, weight) of the camera bodies, but the size (and quality) of the lenses. I shoot solely using prime lenses and there are some truly superb lenses in this system. I can carry an extra lens or two zipped up in my coat pockets and I don't feel like I'm carrying excessive gear with me. Also, I love the wide-ranging lens options across Lumix, Lumix/Leica, Olympus, etc.
I totally agree! I love street photography and with these huge heavy lenses for full frame you just scare people away. My GX9 with these little light lenses is so unobtrusive in comparison. And at the same time I can get wonderful landscape and portrait shots. And it's such a beautiful camera: Panasonic's little Leica ...
They make comparisons between the G9 which is a 2017 machine and the new FF machines, with the G9 that already in 2017 offered the burst without blackout with electronic shutter, 20 fps (the OM1 reached 50 fps in 2022), SHF pre burst system with autofocus of 2017, 6k photos, beautiful video mode .... I guess what those of Panasonic can do if they released a future G9 mkii or G10!!!
Back in 2014 I left Australia to travel the world for a year. I had a Canon 7D with a 24-105L and a 70-200 F4L and though the results I was getting was very good. Mate the size and weight was just a bastard! To the point where a lot of the times I knew I was missing out on shots because I couldn't be bothered to either bring or whip out such a big and heavy set up. After I did a wonderful 3 month backpacking trip around Europe I vowed to get something more manageable and thankfully I was low key eyeing up an Olympus OMD EM5 prior to leaving Australia. So I sold my Canon gear and picked up an EM5 with the 14-42mm kit lens and a 45mm 1.8 and it was honestly the best move I've ever made for my photography. Because of the compact size and weight saved compared to my Canon gear. I was able to take a lot more shots and not be burdened at all which was such a relief. It's a lot easier to take shots with a M43 set up while riding on top of a camel in The Sahara for sure. Fast forward to 2022 and I own multiple M43 cameras such as the G9, GH5, G85, GX85, GM1 and OMD EM1 with an arsenal of great lenses. I honestly love this system and will be shooting with it for many years to come I'm sure of it. Great video mate!
I bought the OMD EM5 in the USA brand new even wearing out a few batteries, took to japan and still use it to this day. Also took it and a new Gx85 to Singapore and hot, humid, saltwater Philippines. I also bought the ultra compact 1 inch sensor Lumix LS100 and love it too. Then a new Fuji that Is also nice but stays in its case as I dont want to scratch it so I shall sell it hopefully soon. The point is that my travel photography is evolving into more video- as M43 has always made amazing travel video for me and ppl I loves entertainment. At the end of the day that is what these rugged little cameras are alk about. Keeping FUN in photography.
Nice to hear mate! I have a GX85 too and love the stills and video coming from it. You are definitely right in keeping gear that makes photography fun aye.
You're bringing up some great points about this system, Grant! With a lighter system you are more mobile, can compose quickly, and less fatigue on your hands and wrist if you're out all day. I do candid photography and like to get real close with the olympus 45mm 1.8 and one of the reasons I can get closer to subjects without disturbing the moment is because the body and lenses of MFT are very discreet. And the criticism with depth of field compared to full frame... too tell the truth there are times I really envy the creamy bokeh of FF systems for portraits. But I think if the story within your photos is done correctly, then the background blur is the last thing on the viewer's mind. And the affordability of the system when you are starting out, you have a great dispense of prime lenses to start with without breaking your bank account from both the Lumix and OM line up. What you said about M43 "make you work for the 'end product'" that's so true, and because of the MFT's DOF, it makes me think about the background more to compensate for the f1.8 of my lenses for portrait work. There was a point brought up in another channel of a MFT user (Terry Lanes) why MFT has a negative reception is because, in linguistic terms, using the word 'Micro' carries a meaning of 'inferiority' in Western languages compared to the word 'Full'. But it's not until you actually hold a MFT system that you can understand why the community is very much alive and vibrant.
Hey :) - yeah, it’s a great system & perfect for all the stuff I do - both personal and professional… Thanks for the comments and great feedback and points :)
As a new GX9 owner I’m enjoying it so far. I sold all of my Fuji and Voigtlander gear. So far just the GX9 and the Pana - Leica 25mm f1.4. Love the size, the weight, and the performance so far. I appreciate your videos, and look forward to learning the nuances of this system. I had a Leica D-Lux6 years ago, so I have come back to M43. So far I’m very happy.
Hi Joe Joe. How do you like the Leica 25/1.4 lens? I am a speculant on that lens but I have heard that it has cromatic aberration. Great to hear from more GX9 users. :-)
@@andreassilverbris9924 I haven’t used my 25mm 1.4 extensively, but in the images that I’ve taken I haven’t had an issue with CA. I have shot both color and B&W images and have been quite happy with it so far.
I have the G85. Sure, cameras that are 5x the price of mine might pick some more detail in big open shots but my MFT does just fine. I get EPIC shots w it.
I bought the OMD EM5 in the USA brand new even wearing out a few batteries, took to Japan and still use it to this day. Also took it and a new Gx85 to Singapore and hot, humid, saltwater Philippines. I also bought the ultra compact 1 inch sensor Lumix LS100 and love it too. Then a new Fuji that Is also nice but stays in its case as I dont want to scratch it so I shall sell it hopefully soon. The point is that my travel photography is evolving into more video- as M43 has always made amazing travel video for me and ppl I loves entertainment. At the end of the day that is what these rugged little cameras are alk about. Keeping FUN in photography.
I found that the GH (GH5 I/II/s, GH6) series reach the goldilocks zone for anamorphic. Due to the unique sensor size, it can shoot open gate revealing the whole sensor, just like Alexas. But most of all, anamorphic setups are extremely heavy, easily over 2kg >4lb on average. GH5's crop sensor can handle smaller anamorphics and avoid vignette easier. Therefore, it means lighter setups. The even nicer thing is the floating sensor allows for the best in class IBIS stabilization. Full frame is hard to achieve because the sensor is bigger.
I have the GX9 too. It can punch above its weight. Agree with you about those people who say Micro4/3 is dead. It is not dead. Its just a format. Just use it to your advantage. Actually, I like the 4/3 ratio and not the 3/2 ratio. The smaller system makes it so much easier to carry around. Ultimately, it facilitate you to shoot more.
The TTArtisan 35mm f/1.4 works well on my Canon M100 (APS-C) . The 17mm f/1.4 is slightly better on the Micro4/3 system. You will get about 34mm in FF terms. The Laowa will give you a very useful 20mm in FF terms. Excellent for landscape. It does not distort and give a very distinct star burst for night scenes.
If you really examine the tech and specs in the new M4/3 cameras, it often surpasses full frame gear that the pros were more than happy with 5-10 years ago. There are easy solutions to almost all the perceived weaknesses. Really, low light action is the only thing that's tough to overcome. If I was going to shoot that, I might skip over full frame to medium format. Ha
I just decided to get a camera, mostly for travel, (and taking better pictures of the dog), and just to learn a bit about photography (I've had cameras, but never really learned to use one properly). I decided to get an lx100ii, and then decided to also get a gx9 to play with lenses. Funny thing: relatively speaking, I find the gx9 heavy enough that I probably wont be taking it on holiday (the lx100ii has been great fun, and a great learning tool). The advice nowadays seems to be to stick to a mobile phone, but I dislike digital zoom, and the colours (at least on my pixel 6), just look weird to me.
I've had the gx85, gx9, g95, g9 my favorites are the gx9 and g95. The g9 awesome camera but a little to big for me. I've had no issue shooting low night with M43 with quick lenses. I recently sold all of my M43 stuff and thinking about going back to gx9 for street with 20mm, 15mm. No customer is going to question dynamic range faster glass brings it to life.
Robert thanks for this video. My experience with GX9 is very similar - I love it - more than any Panny M43 (GH from 2/3/4/5, GX7, GX80 and then some) so far. With upcoming AI NR solutions (aka DXO, Topaz or ON1) plus shooting RAW it seems pretty incredible how far you push the ISO and still get very good pics. In my case with JPGs I limit myself to 3200, 6400 ISO in emergency, however with above mentioned POST proc. software, it is hard to believe what you can get out from M43.
Great video, I am just an amateur but also put lightweight ahead of ultimate image quality. I also have an aps-c Sony a6300 but find its handling leaves something to be desired. My m4/3 gear is Olympus, two EM-1s and an EM-5 mkII.
Thanks Ira - Yes I have head things about the handling of the Sony's - I have thought about getting a a6400 but have always thought twice because of the handling :) Thanks again...
I have a G9 and a GH5s, together they are amazing at covering image stabilization and low light problems. I hardly use my Nikon any more although it is quite good too.
My catalog has images shot with all sorts of sensor sizes, and not going to lie, I often think an image is one I shot on a full frame but it ends up being one in shot on m43. Love my m43 gear when I need high quality in a compact and lightweight package.
I went on a citytrip last week taking the gx9, the 20 mm f 1.7 Lumix and the 45 mm f 1.8 Olympus Zuiko. That was all I needed. Maybe on one or two occasions I wished I had taken something a little wider like a 17 mm. I still have my Canon 5diii (wonderful machine) but indeed the weight and the size has become too much. Truth be told todays mirrorless FF camera’s are much smaller and so are the prime lenses. The zoom lenses remain big and heavy.
M43 is ultimately about portability - an 80MP monster at home is not catching images and they usually require a tripod to actually get the full potential - M43 IBIS and OIS works better than larger formats as well.
I got an old sony a65 that i love. But i got in to m43 for the video. The price is fine, the quality is great, i hope i get better in photography whith my gh5, but i really dont trust 100% my GH cameras. I still carry the sony for photography.
nice one :) lots of people do use the GH5 for photography including myself - I’d recommend spending some time with it for photography as you can get some great results :)
MFT's is getting more popular as time goes by.. certain "Pro Photographers" said it would be Dead by 2020.. how wrong they were.. the G80/85 has new firmware in 2022 so that is saying something about Panasonic supporting their "older" cameras.. MFT's are set to stay around for a long time ahead. MERRY CHRISTMAS FOLKS.
Yeah man if I have too I will push the ISO for sure :) Would not really go past 6400 - The tiny M43 sensor really makes you think and work for the shots 📷🤔📷
Hi Grant, had one last year and part exed it. Want another one now to go with a 14 140mm but can't get it due to shortages....doh... I thought a great feature to be the swiveling view finder, great for low shots. Keep up the good work.
The size and weight advantage of micro four thirds is pretty much gone in 2022. Most FF mirrorless lenses have shrunk and some are actually smaller than the micro four thirds equivalent.
Every time someone suggests what you said there is always someone in the comments who shoot holes in the suggestion with very concrete examples, as here as well.
The price of those cameras is absolutely ridiculous though. I got my G85 for $650. I get photos that are absolutely EPIC. I have FF photographers complimenting my work consistently. Imo the price jump is nowhere near worth it when I can do what I can do w MFT
I think that this system makes sense especially now. The image quality difference between sensor sizes has been largely mitigated by improvements in software. The ‘Enhance’ function, or even direct enlargement of RAW files in photoshop is so amazing now that I get excellent 36x24 inches enlargements from my gx 85, a 16 megapixel, somewhat dated sensor. ON 1 raw gives similar results. I did some comparisons by downloading APSC and full frame raw files from internet and differences in print were negligible. I also have Nikon d810, with bunch of lenses. The files coming out of Nikon system are clearly better but advantages would only show up on very large prints. Needless to say, the Panasonic gx85 is always with me, files are smaller thus easier to handle, -this in my opinion makes a better everyday use system. I can see however that there might be situations where the 36 megapixels full frame would be preferable.
Great to see more people using the GX9. I love my GX9 and I use it mostly with Nocticron and Olympus 75/1.8. My wife has a G9 and we also have a Lumix G800 and some other Lumix/Leica and Olympus lenses. We share lenses. The system is great. I am a GX9 fan. Thanks for the this video.
Yeah Andreas - Awesome System :) with heaps of options :)
Thanks very much for this and your other recent videos about the GX9. It's great to see this fine and often overlooked camera being reassessed and appreciated in 2022. Since getting out and travelling more again following the relaxation of COVID restrictions I have also found that, whereas I previously relied on my G9 for more serious shooting , my GX9 has come back into its own and become my go to camera. As you say, a key element in this its lightness, flexibility and all-round ease of use - it's great not to have that weight and bulk to drag around, especially as I get older.
I've also significantly reduced use of my older, heavier (7-14mm and 14-140mm) zoom lenses in favour of the light, sharp and fast Panasonic 15mm and 42.5mm primes. I do a lot of urban landscape and documentary photography so I've just ordered the new 9mm F1.7 to add to the set and I'm looking forward very much to combining that with the GX9 when it finally arrives.
That’s great Bob 👍 - yeah it really comes down to size for me too :) I just can’t to the bulky cameras anymore! That 9mm will be great!
Hi Bob, exactly the same experience here. Having used gh2/3/5, GX7, Gx80 - with plenty of M43 lenses (not to mention film Nikons Pentaxes and digi Nikons). I bought some months ago GX9 - and I love it. I tend to use zooms in the past, not anymore - because small primes 1,7/20, 1,7 42,5 are so wonderfull and performing. With new AI based NR solutions (Topaz and ON1) my action ratio reaches easily 12800 ISO (even 25600 is still usable) especially when shooting RAW (as I always do). Urban, street photography, differnet types of action/documentary - wherever small form factor and inconspicuousness is a must - GX9 is just fantastic. Now looking forward to new Summilux 1,7/9mm - within couple of days - hopefully -will be here.
Saying M43 is dead is similar to saying Cameras are dead - because of Phones (which I like BTW - HUAWEI). 😀
I just came upon this video as I'm re-confirming my commitment to MFT...largely for the reasons you share. I've never been one to get caught up in the latest and greatest technology, but instead look hard at what will work for me and my artwork/photography. I shoot MFT not only because of the size (form-function, ergonomics, weight) of the camera bodies, but the size (and quality) of the lenses. I shoot solely using prime lenses and there are some truly superb lenses in this system. I can carry an extra lens or two zipped up in my coat pockets and I don't feel like I'm carrying excessive gear with me. Also, I love the wide-ranging lens options across Lumix, Lumix/Leica, Olympus, etc.
The Panasonic gx9 us the most underrated camera ever! Great video!
Totally agree!
I totally agree! I love street photography and with these huge heavy lenses for full frame you just scare people away. My GX9 with these little light lenses is so unobtrusive in comparison. And at the same time I can get wonderful landscape and portrait shots. And it's such a beautiful camera: Panasonic's little Leica ...
Love my GX9. Image quality is great. I also shoot a Sony A7III but the GX9 with a few quality M4/3 lenses is plenty good for most applications.
They make comparisons between the G9 which is a 2017 machine and the new FF machines, with the G9 that already in 2017 offered the burst without blackout with electronic shutter, 20 fps (the OM1 reached 50 fps in 2022), SHF pre burst system with autofocus of 2017, 6k photos, beautiful video mode .... I guess what those of Panasonic can do if they released a future G9 mkii or G10!!!
Great points :) Yes G10 👏📷👏
Back in 2014 I left Australia to travel the world for a year. I had a Canon 7D with a 24-105L and a 70-200 F4L and though the results I was getting was very good. Mate the size and weight was just a bastard! To the point where a lot of the times I knew I was missing out on shots because I couldn't be bothered to either bring or whip out such a big and heavy set up.
After I did a wonderful 3 month backpacking trip around Europe I vowed to get something more manageable and thankfully I was low key eyeing up an Olympus OMD EM5 prior to leaving Australia. So I sold my Canon gear and picked up an EM5 with the 14-42mm kit lens and a 45mm 1.8 and it was honestly the best move I've ever made for my photography. Because of the compact size and weight saved compared to my Canon gear. I was able to take a lot more shots and not be burdened at all which was such a relief. It's a lot easier to take shots with a M43 set up while riding on top of a camel in The Sahara for sure.
Fast forward to 2022 and I own multiple M43 cameras such as the G9, GH5, G85, GX85, GM1 and OMD EM1 with an arsenal of great lenses. I honestly love this system and will be shooting with it for many years to come I'm sure of it. Great video mate!
Thanks mate :) Yeah its the size factor for sure :) Yep same - can not do the big cameras anymore!!!
I bought the OMD EM5 in the USA brand new even wearing out a few batteries, took to japan and still use it to this day. Also took it and a new Gx85 to Singapore and hot, humid, saltwater Philippines. I also bought the ultra compact 1 inch sensor Lumix LS100 and love it too. Then a new Fuji that Is also nice but stays in its case as I dont want to scratch it so I shall sell it hopefully soon.
The point is that my travel photography is evolving into more video- as M43 has always made amazing travel video for me and ppl I loves entertainment. At the end of the day that is what these rugged little cameras are alk about. Keeping FUN in photography.
Nice to hear mate! I have a GX85 too and love the stills and video coming from it. You are definitely right in keeping gear that makes photography fun aye.
You're bringing up some great points about this system, Grant! With a lighter system you are more mobile, can compose quickly, and less fatigue on your hands and wrist if you're out all day. I do candid photography and like to get real close with the olympus 45mm 1.8 and one of the reasons I can get closer to subjects without disturbing the moment is because the body and lenses of MFT are very discreet. And the criticism with depth of field compared to full frame... too tell the truth there are times I really envy the creamy bokeh of FF systems for portraits. But I think if the story within your photos is done correctly, then the background blur is the last thing on the viewer's mind. And the affordability of the system when you are starting out, you have a great dispense of prime lenses to start with without breaking your bank account from both the Lumix and OM line up. What you said about M43 "make you work for the 'end product'" that's so true, and because of the MFT's DOF, it makes me think about the background more to compensate for the f1.8 of my lenses for portrait work.
There was a point brought up in another channel of a MFT user (Terry Lanes) why MFT has a negative reception is because, in linguistic terms, using the word 'Micro' carries a meaning of 'inferiority' in Western languages compared to the word 'Full'. But it's not until you actually hold a MFT system that you can understand why the community is very much alive and vibrant.
Hey :) - yeah, it’s a great system & perfect for all the stuff I do - both personal and professional… Thanks for the comments and great feedback and points :)
As a new GX9 owner I’m enjoying it so far. I sold all of my Fuji and Voigtlander gear. So far just the GX9 and the Pana - Leica 25mm f1.4. Love the size, the weight, and the performance so far. I appreciate your videos, and look forward to learning the nuances of this system. I had a Leica D-Lux6 years ago, so I have come back to M43. So far I’m very happy.
Awesome Joe :) Yes - the weight and size 100%
Hi Joe Joe. How do you like the Leica 25/1.4 lens? I am a speculant on that lens but I have heard that it has cromatic aberration. Great to hear from more GX9 users. :-)
@@andreassilverbris9924 I haven’t used my 25mm 1.4 extensively, but in the images that I’ve taken I haven’t had an issue with CA. I have shot both color and B&W images and have been quite happy with it so far.
@@JoeJoe4P Great. Thanx. :-)
Thanks for the insightful video, Grant. I enjoy shooting both my GX9 and my G9. They're great cameras and I'm proud of the work that I do with them.
thank you :) that’s great :)
Same here. All my photography is done on the GX9.
I have the G85. Sure, cameras that are 5x the price of mine might pick some more detail in big open shots but my MFT does just fine. I get EPIC shots w it.
i bought a GF 1 and a 20mm 1.7 when they first came out but have just picked up a GX9 body and plan to get the 15mm 1.7 leica lens for when i travel
I bought the OMD EM5 in the USA brand new even wearing out a few batteries, took to Japan and still use it to this day. Also took it and a new Gx85 to Singapore and hot, humid, saltwater Philippines. I also bought the ultra compact 1 inch sensor Lumix LS100 and love it too. Then a new Fuji that Is also nice but stays in its case as I dont want to scratch it so I shall sell it hopefully soon.
The point is that my travel photography is evolving into more video- as M43 has always made amazing travel video for me and ppl I loves entertainment. At the end of the day that is what these rugged little cameras are alk about. Keeping FUN in photography.
Yes :) Great Stuff :)
I found that the GH (GH5 I/II/s, GH6) series reach the goldilocks zone for anamorphic. Due to the unique sensor size, it can shoot open gate revealing the whole sensor, just like Alexas. But most of all, anamorphic setups are extremely heavy, easily over 2kg >4lb on average. GH5's crop sensor can handle smaller anamorphics and avoid vignette easier. Therefore, it means lighter setups. The even nicer thing is the floating sensor allows for the best in class IBIS stabilization. Full frame is hard to achieve because the sensor is bigger.
Love my M4/3. The small size, wonderful controls, excellent (and small and lightweight) lenses and terrific picture quality are a winning combination.
Couldn't agree more!
I have the GX9 too. It can punch above its weight. Agree with you about those people who say Micro4/3 is dead. It is not dead. Its just a format. Just use it to your advantage. Actually, I like the 4/3 ratio and not the 3/2 ratio. The smaller system makes it so much easier to carry around. Ultimately, it facilitate you to shoot more.
Yeah Chris it’s so not dead - Just a format :) and yes punches way above its weight
By the way, it gives a very good performance with the Laowa 10mm f/2.0 for landscapes and cityscspes. Give it a try if you can buy that lens.
Nice, I’ll have to look into one - I’ve got a Manual TTArtisans 35mm coming soon, see how that goes too!!! :)
The TTArtisan 35mm f/1.4 works well on my Canon M100 (APS-C) . The 17mm f/1.4 is slightly better on the Micro4/3 system. You will get about 34mm in FF terms. The Laowa will give you a very useful 20mm in FF terms. Excellent for landscape. It does not distort and give a very distinct star burst for night scenes.
RIGHT ON THE MONEY.
Yes :)
If you really examine the tech and specs in the new M4/3 cameras, it often surpasses full frame gear that the pros were more than happy with 5-10 years ago. There are easy solutions to almost all the perceived weaknesses. Really, low light action is the only thing that's tough to overcome. If I was going to shoot that, I might skip over full frame to medium format. Ha
I just decided to get a camera, mostly for travel, (and taking better pictures of the dog), and just to learn a bit about photography (I've had cameras, but never really learned to use one properly). I decided to get an lx100ii, and then decided to also get a gx9 to play with lenses. Funny thing: relatively speaking, I find the gx9 heavy enough that I probably wont be taking it on holiday (the lx100ii has been great fun, and a great learning tool).
The advice nowadays seems to be to stick to a mobile phone, but I dislike digital zoom, and the colours (at least on my pixel 6), just look weird to me.
lx100ii - Awesome little camera :)
I've had the gx85, gx9, g95, g9 my favorites are the gx9 and g95. The g9 awesome camera but a little to big for me. I've had no issue shooting low night with M43 with quick lenses. I recently sold all of my M43 stuff and thinking about going back to gx9 for street with 20mm, 15mm. No customer is going to question dynamic range faster glass brings it to life.
Yes I find my G9 a bit big too … Yes GREAT Street camera 📷
Robert thanks for this video. My experience with GX9 is very similar - I love it - more than any Panny M43 (GH from 2/3/4/5, GX7, GX80 and then some) so far. With upcoming AI NR solutions (aka DXO, Topaz or ON1) plus shooting RAW it seems pretty incredible how far you push the ISO and still get very good pics. In my case with JPGs I limit myself to 3200, 6400 ISO in emergency, however with above mentioned POST proc. software, it is hard to believe what you can get out from M43.
Yeah - amazing how far you can push the iso!!!
Great video, I am just an amateur but also put lightweight ahead of ultimate image quality. I also have an aps-c Sony a6300 but find its handling leaves something to be desired. My m4/3 gear is Olympus, two EM-1s and an EM-5 mkII.
Thanks Ira - Yes I have head things about the handling of the Sony's - I have thought about getting a a6400 but have always thought twice because of the handling :) Thanks again...
I have a G9 and a GH5s, together they are amazing at covering image stabilization and low light problems. I hardly use my Nikon any more although it is quite good too.
yes I still like my Nikon stuff too :)
My catalog has images shot with all sorts of sensor sizes, and not going to lie, I often think an image is one I shot on a full frame but it ends up being one in shot on m43. Love my m43 gear when I need high quality in a compact and lightweight package.
Yes, I agree :)
I went on a citytrip last week taking the gx9, the 20 mm f 1.7 Lumix and the 45 mm f 1.8 Olympus Zuiko. That was all I needed. Maybe on one or two occasions I wished I had taken something a little wider like a 17 mm. I still have my Canon 5diii (wonderful machine) but indeed the weight and the size has become too much. Truth be told todays mirrorless FF camera’s are much smaller and so are the prime lenses. The zoom lenses remain big and heavy.
That’s great :) Nice little kit 📷
M43 is ultimately about portability - an 80MP monster at home is not catching images and they usually require a tripod to actually get the full potential - M43 IBIS and OIS works better than larger formats as well.
Yes - good points 👍
I got an old sony a65 that i love. But i got in to m43 for the video. The price is fine, the quality is great, i hope i get better in photography whith my gh5, but i really dont trust 100% my GH cameras. I still carry the sony for photography.
nice one :) lots of people do use the GH5 for photography including myself - I’d recommend spending some time with it for photography as you can get some great results :)
MFT's is getting more popular as time goes by.. certain "Pro Photographers" said it would be Dead by 2020.. how wrong they were.. the G80/85 has new firmware in 2022 so that is saying something about Panasonic supporting their "older" cameras.. MFT's are set to stay around for a long time ahead. MERRY CHRISTMAS FOLKS.
Yes I agree :) and merry Christmas to you too :)
Dude... Check your thumbnail.... :)
Thanks - I’ll fix it tomorrow! Good spotting :)
do you or anyone here use 6400 and beyond ISO say where you’ve got to shoot high speed because people are moving … in poor light?
Yeah man if I have too I will push the ISO for sure :) Would not really go past 6400 - The tiny M43 sensor really makes you think and work for the shots 📷🤔📷
I shot event at 12000 and with dxoprime noise reduction everything looked just perfect, you can give it a try, hope it helps :)
Because there is no GX10 yet 😄
Well....I m still shooting a Canon 5DMKII in 2022 and I´m still alive!!!!!
Yes…
Don't keep it to yourself Grant....is it the weight?
yes :) indeed :)
@@grantrobertdavies you should have said....
Hi Grant, had one last year and part exed it. Want another one now to go with a 14 140mm but can't get it due to shortages....doh... I thought a great feature to be the swiveling view finder, great for low shots. Keep up the good work.
The size and weight advantage of micro four thirds is pretty much gone in 2022. Most FF mirrorless lenses have shrunk and some are actually smaller than the micro four thirds equivalent.
Yes - It’s getting a bit like that :)
Really? I'm just looking at some of the latest Canon RF lenses and they are huge.
you can't cheat physics, m43 will always be lighter!
Every time someone suggests what you said there is always someone in the comments who shoot holes in the suggestion with very concrete examples, as here as well.
The price of those cameras is absolutely ridiculous though. I got my G85 for $650. I get photos that are absolutely EPIC. I have FF photographers complimenting my work consistently. Imo the price jump is nowhere near worth it when I can do what I can do w MFT
I think that this system makes sense especially now. The image quality difference between sensor sizes has been largely mitigated by improvements in software. The ‘Enhance’ function, or even direct enlargement of RAW files in photoshop is so amazing now that I get excellent 36x24 inches enlargements from my gx 85, a 16 megapixel, somewhat dated sensor. ON 1 raw gives similar results. I did some comparisons by downloading APSC and full frame raw files from internet and differences in print were negligible. I also have Nikon d810, with bunch of lenses. The files coming out of Nikon system are clearly better but advantages would only show up on very large prints. Needless to say, the Panasonic gx85 is always with me, files are smaller thus easier to handle, -this in my opinion makes a better everyday use system. I can see however that there might be situations where the 36 megapixels full frame would be preferable.