List of Weapons sent by USA to help Ukraine Against Russia In 2022

Поделиться
HTML-код

Комментарии • 1,5 тыс.

  • @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б
    @СтаниславСорокин-ъ3б 2 года назад +371

    As a citizen of Ukraine, I want to thank you for helping us in the fight against the Russian tyrant Putin, whose ambitions are close to those of Hitler, a lot of people have already died, both civilians and military, the longer we hold on, the more the economy of aggressive Russia falls.

    • @seangendreau2951
      @seangendreau2951 2 года назад +27

      Never give up

    • @blackhawk7r221
      @blackhawk7r221 2 года назад +13

      Keep bleeding them. Each man only has to kill one enemy per day to destroy enemy morale over the long term.

    • @gregstephens2339
      @gregstephens2339 2 года назад +27

      Say nothing of it. I wish we could do more.

    • @pxrays547
      @pxrays547 2 года назад +17

      I too, wish we could do more.

    • @dannytansweeboon5793
      @dannytansweeboon5793 2 года назад +12

      Be proud of your beloved heroes like the grey wolf. Fight fascism to the end brother.

  • @mwtrolle
    @mwtrolle 2 года назад +214

    No wonder Russia is struggling, those systems seem absolutely perfect for a defending army laying in ambushes attacking armored columns and logistics.
    But Ukraine needs more ASAP!

    • @Elthenar
      @Elthenar 2 года назад +20

      That's exactly what many of these weapons were built to do. Fight a defensive war against massed Soviet armor rolling into Europe via East Germany. Especially the Javelin and Stinger.

    • @peterzin8979
      @peterzin8979 2 года назад +10

      i want them to send some anti ship missile so a russian ship gets sank that will cause many casualties and its will stop this war! give them 10 of them sink 10 russian ships.

    • @mwendapoleee
      @mwendapoleee 2 года назад

      Wow some action on the frontline wish i would have a sneak peek!They are getting more from all euro zone hahs vladimir will not be amused lol

    • @jitttttt
      @jitttttt 2 года назад +9

      Imagine if Ukraine gets A-10 Warthogs and Apache from NATO. Effective Tank and armor vehicle killers!

    • @anfrale4657
      @anfrale4657 2 года назад +4

      @@jitttttt lol no. Those requirw alot of training and are expensive af. They got 70 more though.

  • @xzqzq
    @xzqzq 2 года назад +373

    Too bad USA didn't simply transfer all our military stuff from Afghanistan to Ukraine....

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +20

      And Ukraine will sell it on black market like majority of their arsenal ...

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +8

      @@sportsjavo Where is that cash hmm ?!
      Last time i check Ukraine was poorest country in Europe and number one by corruption.
      So you have only wet dreams no facts ...

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +6

      @@sportsjavo Rebels have high tech Ukraine weapons, many videos where Ukrop officers selling weapons to them 😂

    • @hendrikvanderwalt5866
      @hendrikvanderwalt5866 2 года назад +2

      Fact... 👈

    • @hendrikvanderwalt5866
      @hendrikvanderwalt5866 2 года назад +2

      @@sportsjavo 😂😂😂😂

  • @lelikbolek1362
    @lelikbolek1362 2 года назад +44

    Thanks for everyone who stands for us all over the world-if there was a time when Ukraine needed to be helped -it’s NOW.

    • @seanavp
      @seanavp 2 года назад +2

      *I wish we could do more to help Ukraine.* *However, we cannot risk a larger conflict breaking out with a tyrant who targets nuclear power facilities, who has put his nuclear weapons on high alert, and has already used unlawful weapons on innocent men, women, and children.* *Putin is truly the madman from Moscow!* *I truly wish you all the best - and victory!* ✌

    • @bkh5746
      @bkh5746 2 года назад

      Other countries sending weapons tells me that ukraine doesnt have jack shit but a bunch of pea shooters.
      All putin has to do is just turn it into a long range game.thats what id do.hell with sending in a bunch of tanks and soldiers shoot big missiles in big cities and they will leave.thats only reason they send in tanks is to play nice and run out the smart people,while the dumbasses stay behind and die.stubborness always cost a bunch of lives.hell the military teaches ya not to be a hero for a reason.

    • @wastl5000
      @wastl5000 2 года назад

      @@robbywilshire the Azov Bataillon cant help Biden anymore. They are completly destroyd in the Donbass Region now.

    • @rogerdildeau7507
      @rogerdildeau7507 2 года назад

      All they care about is MONEY.

    • @lelikbolek1362
      @lelikbolek1362 2 года назад

      @@rogerdildeau7507 do you know what is "land lease"means and how it works? If you do not -inform yourself. And by the way :everybody cares about money,only communists says they don't,but it's fake.

  • @seanavp
    @seanavp 2 года назад +152

    *I pray that every ammo. round, grenade, and missile finds it's Russian target.* *I only wish NATO could do more in support of Ukraine.* *Best of luck, mates!*

    • @mr.crowgamer6250
      @mr.crowgamer6250 2 года назад +4

      Send your prayers and thoughts through the post

    • @spirituality2.093
      @spirituality2.093 2 года назад +11

      Dont think you should pray for people to die. No matter what country there from. Pray for peace in the Ukrain instead.

    • @hornet224
      @hornet224 2 года назад +2

      NATO will hand it off to the USA to do the dirty work. They are entitled.

    • @dissent1557
      @dissent1557 2 года назад +1

      Imagine praying for people to die, the god you pray to will send you to hell for wishing death upon thousands

    • @robertoa8672
      @robertoa8672 2 года назад +2

      i join to your prayer - the red army has turned into a bunch of assassins with no honour - they kill ukrainian civilians to weaken the resistance of the population

  • @rico_cavalierie
    @rico_cavalierie 2 года назад +105

    Error. The Mossberg 500 will NOT a mile, effective range is typically less than 50 meters. Using slugs and some patience it can go out to 100 meters.

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 года назад +18

      yeah, I heard that, and was like ummmmmm a shotgun at a mile??? clearly this person has never used a shotgun

    • @wburtney5154
      @wburtney5154 2 года назад +1

      Didn't look like a military or police shotgun.

    • @TacticalTerry
      @TacticalTerry 2 года назад +3

      @@wburtney5154 The police in the US have most likely used them before. It will probably see limited use at very close ranges (or as a breaching weapon to open doors).

    • @tomg5187
      @tomg5187 2 года назад +8

      Maybe she meant it as a metaphor. “The accuracy is ‘miles’ better with the choke etc”. An unfortunate choice of words, but there you go 😆

    • @statelypenguin
      @statelypenguin 2 года назад +1

      ya gotta have faith

  • @JJawsyW
    @JJawsyW 2 года назад +73

    The information you reported on the Mossberg 500 shot were wrong.
    The military issue shot come with either an 18 or 20 inch barrel and only has an effective range of 100 to 150 yards depending on the load used.
    Slugs or 00 buck. It is a secondary weapon used at close range.

    • @hiloboy4life2002
      @hiloboy4life2002 2 года назад +9

      was gonna say a mile?

    • @williamtolbert5473
      @williamtolbert5473 2 года назад +6

      100 - 150 yards is pushing it. more like 50 maybe. Ive been hit multiple times while hunting from bbs 100 yrds away. Granted that was low brass but it does nothing.

    • @CorsetGrace
      @CorsetGrace 2 года назад +1

      They are primarily used in close quarter fighting. In trenches and basements, they are extremely deadly and require little to no training since you don't really need to aim.

    • @davidkanengieter
      @davidkanengieter 2 года назад +3

      Shotguns are primarily a 40 yard or less weapon. 100 to 150 is way out there. Even with slugs, they will drop 5 inches low at 50 yards.

    • @TheTunaMaster
      @TheTunaMaster 2 года назад

      even a hundred yards would be a stretch and without rifling as accurate as a rock

  • @jiyushugi1085
    @jiyushugi1085 2 года назад +26

    They also need some .50 cal sniper rifles. Defeats body armor and works pretty well against vehicles, helicopters, etc.

    • @Rzagski
      @Rzagski 2 года назад +2

      That’s an understatement. 50 cal will shoot right through concrete block walls and immobilize non armored or lightly armored vehicles when shots placed in engine compartment. 50 cal will penetrate an engine block. Effective range on soft targets is a mile easily depending on the shooter.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 2 года назад +4

      They got them. Idk when but they sent Barret 50 cal rifles to them also.

    • @SlavicCelery
      @SlavicCelery 2 года назад +5

      Those are not "sniper rifles". Those are considered anti-material rifles. Primary focus is on soft vehicle targets.

    • @baileyfrazier2635
      @baileyfrazier2635 2 года назад +3

      @@robbywilshire Always just always politics with trumpsters.Heres one for you.At least they got their weapons without being "We need a favor though"

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 года назад +1

      Those would be perfect for taking out Supply convoys
      Just put one round through the engine block

  • @robertwolfe2971
    @robertwolfe2971 2 года назад +25

    Citizens trained with sniper rifles is the deadliest and will always have a higher death toll per round.

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 года назад

      Ukraine will be gone if we send their army to virginia for a couple weeks to learn how to fight my brosky!!!

    • @SlavicCelery
      @SlavicCelery 2 года назад +1

      Training a citizen to effectively use a rifle in a DMR/sniper capacity takes months of training, if not years. You also need a certain amount of natural skill preexisting for the role. Ukraine needs defense now, not a year from now.

    • @SlavicCelery
      @SlavicCelery 2 года назад

      @@charlespester2398 There's an inherent difference between Ukrainian Infantry and "Citizens trained with sniper rifles".
      Not to mention "sniper" doesn't just mean long range optics enhanced shooting. It's primarily a recon role with harassment. A DMR is probably closer to what people mean, but even with that. A random citizen with trigger time is good, but means nearly fuckall in an active warzone.

    • @Izreal-Zeus
      @Izreal-Zeus 2 года назад

      @@SlavicCelery not really. A technical sniper takes months or years of training. Anyone can practice long range and obtain an innate feel for a rifle and environment.

  • @johnblue8907
    @johnblue8907 2 года назад +184

    The UK has sent 2,000 N-Law anti tank weapons to Ukraine

    • @paulscountry456
      @paulscountry456 2 года назад +5

      You really need main battle tanks,not pop bottle rockets.

    • @zeblanmaidaynovich796
      @zeblanmaidaynovich796 2 года назад +2

      Russia and PRORussian soil said thx these are already in are arms reality fact that's why Crimea and Donbas is Russia for 7+ years and now whole Ukraine will be😂😃😆

    • @z1gzagu3r
      @z1gzagu3r 2 года назад +2

      Rusia is thanking UK, USA and other countries for the weapon donation.

    • @Maxi.mu-
      @Maxi.mu- 2 года назад +3

      The Ukrainians are a people who want peace. Stop sending weapons to Ukraine... Some of these weapons go to criminal terrorists who entered with immigrants to Europe in the past years, and they have enmity with Russia and the weapons you send to Ukraine will be used in a bad way and this will affect the lives of innocent citizens in Ukraine... You are burning Ukraine... Don't do this... Act wisely... Now the weapon is just like spraying oil on fire... Ask the Ukrainian president to respect his people and get out of Ukraine instead of this method because of which a country is burning It's all because of one person... he doesn't act wisely.

    • @Mistah2
      @Mistah2 2 года назад +6

      What has Germany sent? Pillows? 😳

  • @Palehorae20
    @Palehorae20 2 года назад +61

    I would pay money to see a Mossberg 500 hit anything at 5280 feet

    • @victoria19853
      @victoria19853 2 года назад +6

      Is a well known fact slug rounds can travel over a mile that’s what my mossberg shotgun manual says.

    • @billy56081
      @billy56081 2 года назад +1

      @@victoria19853 You may want to watch Taofladermous and restate what you said.

    • @victoria19853
      @victoria19853 2 года назад

      @@billy56081 I watched some of that channel’s videos in the past. Regardless a slug round could travel well over a mile.

    • @t.r.4496
      @t.r.4496 2 года назад +6

      The shotguns are to be used to clear trenches. Have you seen the trenches in Eastern Ukraine it looks like a WW1 battlefield. A load of buckshot will spread the width of the trenches. Even the Germans complained the use of them was a war crime in WW2.

    • @Palehorae20
      @Palehorae20 2 года назад +4

      @@t.r.4496 I don’t doubt the size of the trenches shotguns are very short range weapons. I was kind of making fun of the description. Hitting anything with a shotgun at that range meaning a mile would take divine intervention. As another person commented the manual of their shotgun says a slug can reach a mile. I would challenge anyone to even hit center mass of police B 27 target at 200 yards with a Mossberg 500 loaded with slugs that is 600 feet a mile is 5280 feet.

  • @whatabouttheearth
    @whatabouttheearth 2 года назад +67

    "increases the range by a mile" 😂 god damn them Mossbergs got alot better since I've last used them

    • @13ralph41
      @13ralph41 2 года назад +16

      changings duck hunting, no more need for a blind. always nice to see people that have no idea about guns talking about guns

    • @ohyeahwhat5387
      @ohyeahwhat5387 2 года назад +3

      I wish the Italians had sent Benellis.

    • @OleDonKedic
      @OleDonKedic 2 года назад +1

      @@ohyeahwhat5387 Why? A much cheaper Mossberg works just as well a benelli M4. Plus I'm pretty sure Ukraine needs more ATGMs and AA systems as opposed to shotguns.

    • @shotguner4258
      @shotguner4258 2 года назад +1

      @@OleDonKedic try to stay away from shotgun firing if you’re ever nearby ☠️

    • @toaster1971
      @toaster1971 2 года назад

      Want.

  • @vinothmuthiah1666
    @vinothmuthiah1666 2 года назад +27

    Javalin it's nightmare for tanks

    • @williamgibble8361
      @williamgibble8361 2 года назад +4

      IF THEY USE GOOD STRATEGY WITH JAVILIAN SYSTEM, THEY CAN WRECK A LOT OF RUSSIA TANKS.. FIRE AND FORGET SELF GUIDED SYSTEM.. CLOSE TO A MILLION A POP..

    • @floatingchimney
      @floatingchimney 2 года назад

      Active defense systems are a nightmare for Javelins ;)

    • @hazelotida4545
      @hazelotida4545 2 года назад +1

      @@floatingchimney cry 🤣 javelin success destroy Russia tank🤣

    • @jdogdiesel7242
      @jdogdiesel7242 2 года назад +1

      With those long Russian convoys.... It'd be a shame if the front gets taken out by javlens on those narrow roads.... The rest of the convoy would be sitting ducks. Active armor or not .... Multiple Ukrainians with javlens and other anti tank weapons would rip apart a stuck convoy...

  • @kenfelix8703
    @kenfelix8703 2 года назад +27

    “You arm my enemy’s and I will arm yours “

    • @nathaneverson3262
      @nathaneverson3262 2 года назад +1

      Lol is this an actual quote? So Fn true

    • @Shagadin
      @Shagadin 2 года назад +4

      Too bad that the T-72 and SU-30 are not made with edible parts. Many Venezuelans found that the hard way.

    • @zeblanmaidaynovich796
      @zeblanmaidaynovich796 2 года назад +1

      Russia and PRORussian soil said thx these are already in are arms reality fact that's why Crimea and Donbas is Russia for 7+ years and now whole Ukraine will be😂😃😆

    • @Shagadin
      @Shagadin 2 года назад +3

      @@zeblanmaidaynovich796 It will be the last nail in Russia's coffin. They are now global pariahs. The developed world will shut to Russia forever.

  • @mwtrolle
    @mwtrolle 2 года назад +38

    Denmark will send 2700 anti-armor rockets, 300 stinger missiles, 2000 body armors and some first aid stuff as well!
    Sweden sends 5000 anti-armor rockets and some other stuff!

    • @mwtrolle
      @mwtrolle 2 года назад +3

      2700 M-72 are the ones sent from Denmark (the last were delivered yesterday), and Norway is sending 2000 as well!

    • @khanman9146
      @khanman9146 2 года назад +1

      Cheers!

    • @bestopinion9257
      @bestopinion9257 2 года назад +1

      But Russians launch rockets from long distance. They need something to respond to this. Otherwise the Russian's strategy will work.

    • @michaelprobert4014
      @michaelprobert4014 2 года назад

      but how is it going to get there ?

    • @bestopinion9257
      @bestopinion9257 2 года назад

      @@michaelprobert4014 Good question.

  • @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13
    @coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13 2 года назад +26

    lol No one is shooting a shotgun a mile. They're for fairly close usage, especially if you're using buckshot.

    • @bdgctruz5786
      @bdgctruz5786 2 года назад

      Even with slugs thats pushing it unless they’re only using them for cqb missions

    • @floatingchimney
      @floatingchimney 2 года назад +1

      Yeah, I've noticed that "mile" thing - must be a mistake.
      Shotguns are not necessarily only for point blank range like you see it in games, buckshot is effective up to 100 meters for human sized targets and slugs can be used at twice the range.
      However, I'm not sure whether the Russian soldiers wear body armor - if they are, then tje buckshot is useless as it can easily be stopped by the armor.

    • @kenolson6572
      @kenolson6572 2 года назад

      @@floatingchimney A slug would at least knock them down.

  • @shakostarsun
    @shakostarsun 2 года назад +37

    Senator Ted Cruz is the only politician in DC that knows what the Budapest Memorandum was in 1995. USA promised to defend Ukraine if Ukraine gave up it's Nuke weapons.

    • @Moxiell
      @Moxiell 2 года назад +2

      Failed promises. Along with that promise to Yeltsin not expand NATO Eastwards. Truly they must think us Redskins and they will buy us with Firewater... They DID...

    • @Cha-y412
      @Cha-y412 2 года назад +4

      The deal that Bill Clinton brokered with full approval by Delaware Senior Senator Joe Biden ????
      Yeah what about it.

    • @Moxiell
      @Moxiell 2 года назад +5

      @@Cha-y412 It's not about Clinton Biden or Ted Cruz, but Americans falling short and going back on their word. Administrations will change, but you must honor your treaties, unless you have a track record of breaking them. Right?

    • @GotoHere
      @GotoHere 2 года назад +1

      @@Moxiell It’s about an incompetent Biden’s 48 years of failure. Wrong on every foreign policy decision he ever was involved in. Stop making excuses for liar Biden. This is 100% Biden’s fault and failure.

    • @Moxiell
      @Moxiell 2 года назад +5

      @@GotoHere Now you saying it was wrong to get Ukraine to relinquish its nuclear arsenal? Or are you naive enough to think that BIden made that decision, or that BIden been making unilateral decisions for 48 years. What you need tp do, is stop listening to right wing talk radio. Secondly, even though you may not agree with your President or you may not voted for him, he is still the President of your country, if you are in the military he is your Commander in Chief, and you must obey his orders, and if the President you didn't vote for signs a treaty, your country is still bound by it, and if your country goes back on it, it breaks its word, and it damages your country's credibility. NO excuses here, just cold facts. What is it that you think is worth rolling back anyway?

  • @shastaham7630
    @shastaham7630 2 года назад +25

    The narrator's description of the Mossberg 500 shotgun was gibberish!

    • @TheKrighter
      @TheKrighter 2 года назад +1

      It improves the accuracy by a mile?!

  • @The0ldg0at
    @The0ldg0at 2 года назад +41

    A pretty good field testing operation of their troops top gears against real Russian modern gears without risking the lives of any US personnel. That will help DOD to have more real fights data that will improve their war games software.

    • @ycplum7062
      @ycplum7062 2 года назад +6

      None of these systems are very new. Several go back over 3, even 4, decades.

    • @TobbeStorm
      @TobbeStorm 2 года назад

      Does anyone know what kind of small arms did the Us send these last couple of days? I haven’t seen it being written out

    • @davidtimmermann7226
      @davidtimmermann7226 2 года назад +2

      That's what we've been doing in Israel since the 50's.

    • @kbram7363
      @kbram7363 2 года назад +1

      Blah blah blah. Weak comment

    • @questionmaker5666
      @questionmaker5666 2 года назад

      @@davidtimmermann7226 Israel now makes most of its own weapons.

  • @entropy_of_principles
    @entropy_of_principles 2 года назад +39

    God bless USA and Ukraine !

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +6

      😂😂😂😂

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +2

      @Hendrix Cody It's pretty funny that USA badly collapsed with over 2 trilion debts to China, with inflation over 40% currently in USA.
      USA are no longer any key player in World.
      Basically China ownes US 😂
      So its hilarious how much you are ignorant.

    • @ushopelife7538
      @ushopelife7538 2 года назад

      @@pharaon6718 shut up america are number 1 superpower russia the second superpower china the third superpower and iran the middle eastern superpower so all of them are a key player in the world and one of them gotta win the world war 3 and hot war

    • @pharaon6718
      @pharaon6718 2 года назад +2

      @@ushopelife7538 STFU basically
      USA is in China pocket 😂

    • @bdgctruz5786
      @bdgctruz5786 2 года назад

      @@ushopelife7538 correction they’re the second strongest nation only because russia fell short and is suffering economically

  • @giannisgiannis870
    @giannisgiannis870 2 года назад +64

    Javellin Missile is the most stronger anti-tank weapon on earth(it that you can take to your shoulder).Tanks cannot survive if the missile will hit them.

    • @christopherhanton6611
      @christopherhanton6611 2 года назад +19

      indeed ukraine ambushed a group of 14 to 15 t 72 tanks and took them all out with Javellins .

    • @striko22
      @striko22 2 года назад +3

      @@christopherhanton6611 and I heard that it was a tank division and that they destroyed them with two javelins, and the survivors were beaten with farting ... how old are you 5-6?

    • @juhannusruusu
      @juhannusruusu 2 года назад +10

      @@striko22 rather being a 5-6 than an old fart like you, account from 2007 you must be a boomer a with existence crisis :D

    • @vanhoot2234
      @vanhoot2234 2 года назад +1

      isn't the hellfire missle better?

    • @giannisgiannis870
      @giannisgiannis870 2 года назад

      @@vanhoot2234 i know javellin the rocket come from sky

  • @inblack-d9d
    @inblack-d9d 2 года назад +47

    Im sure the Ukrainians are fine soldiers and can put them to good use

  • @aaotcis
    @aaotcis 2 года назад +7

    Back in 2017, US Based company out of California showcased modified M16 rifle (M4) to Ukraine. In 2018, Ukraine adopted the design renaming their version M4WAC47, which was mass produced within Ukraine.

    • @redwolfexr
      @redwolfexr 2 года назад +1

      Yeah, its an AR platform but fires AK rounds out of AK magazines. Not too groundbreaking.
      Odd thing was we provided all that 7.62 ammo and nothing to shoot it with.

    • @jeffreymcfadden9403
      @jeffreymcfadden9403 2 года назад

      @@redwolfexr Corrosive steel case through an AR platform?
      What could possibly go wrong?

    • @redwolfexr
      @redwolfexr 2 года назад

      @@jeffreymcfadden9403 seems they still go "BANG" properly.

    • @vyros.3234
      @vyros.3234 2 года назад

      I saw that one, its used by the Ukranian Marines and special forces, but normal soldiers and the territorial defense force stull use al-47s

  • @royet8161
    @royet8161 2 года назад +29

    The list is missing the best thing the Ukrainian air force needs... a squadron of A-10 Warthogs.

    • @7screamingdizzbusters
      @7screamingdizzbusters 2 года назад +2

      Yes that would be a game changer

    • @mantask.9688
      @mantask.9688 2 года назад +2

      whats that a convoy? do you mean a line of exploded armoured veichles?

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 года назад

      hahhahahah!! Im afraid for ukraine if Russia has 4 miles of heavy equipment. Their number 1 goal needs to get at that convoy and at least harass them so they are at least scared. Right now theres no difference than being on a roadtrip with the bros.

    • @markefulton
      @markefulton 2 года назад

      Damn Straight!

    • @peka2478
      @peka2478 2 года назад +1

      @@davidanalyst671 right now, this convoy has probably all the anti-air coverage it needs; It would be mind-bogglingly stupid if the Russians "forgot" that part...

  • @malleusmaleficarum4572
    @malleusmaleficarum4572 2 года назад +25

    God bless America! Glory to Ukraine!

    • @robertschultz6922
      @robertschultz6922 2 года назад

      Slava Ukrainia

    • @kimkong9622
      @kimkong9622 2 года назад

      @@robertschultz6922 SLAVA RUSSIA . .RUSSIA SILA..

    • @kimkong9622
      @kimkong9622 2 года назад

      GOD BLESS RUSSIA...
      usa no more religious - in LGBT TRUST

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 2 года назад +10

    Where's the .50? We must give them the .50 BMG with AP rounds for trucks and light armored vehicles. So many russian helicopters, so little time.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 2 года назад

      We sis. Just recently but they have them now.

  • @j.dunlop8295
    @j.dunlop8295 2 года назад +16

    👍. 🇺🇦. 🙏 Best hopes and wishes, but pass the ammunition, too!

  • @IronTech96
    @IronTech96 2 года назад +26

    Everything left for the taliban should have went to Ukrainian security

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 2 года назад

      @Fred Freddy Me too but I'm glad they're not nearly as fierce as everyone thought. I hope their S400's are just as bad...

    • @alpearson9158
      @alpearson9158 2 года назад

      ask Trump why he negotiated all that away

  • @EdmundKempersDartboard
    @EdmundKempersDartboard 2 года назад +3

    Those javelins are invaluable.

    • @dragospeta3812
      @dragospeta3812 2 года назад

      Nope... Their value IS aroud 75.000 USD. You burn your house each time you fire one. 😁😆😅

  • @ClemonsKunkel
    @ClemonsKunkel 2 года назад +1

    Stay safe. Wishing Ukraine the best. Russia's not the problem Putin is.

  • @raystarky3896
    @raystarky3896 2 года назад +21

    This armament is great, but is just a small band aid against russia. Did i hear correctly "that the Mossberg 500 is notoriously accurate up to a mile?" yeah right i could maybe believe up to 200yrds, and 300yrds at very rarely accurate

    • @Ja2808R
      @Ja2808R 2 года назад +5

      The whole video was good up until that point. The military uses a 20” heavy walled parkerized cylinder bored 590a1 platform not a 28” vent ribed blued 500 with choke used for hunting. 50 yards max with shot and 200+ with slug - most effective 100 and in. I love the mossberg 5 series platform. The a1 is what they received due to it being the only contracted DoD shotgun besides the Benelli m4 which had no mention.

    • @mwtrolle
      @mwtrolle 2 года назад

      Seems it has helped a lot, but Ukraine needs more ASAP!

    • @davepeters4955
      @davepeters4955 2 года назад +1

      Sorry I didn't see this before I added a comment. "Sniper shotgun"....

    • @raystarky3896
      @raystarky3896 2 года назад

      @@davepeters4955 OK, now that is a new one on me; I it hard enough to get a .30caliber to go accurate beyond 1000yrds. but a shotgun is only good to maybe 200yrds

    • @eduardofan357
      @eduardofan357 2 года назад

      maybe 500 feet ?

  • @reedrk88t
    @reedrk88t 2 года назад +8

    You're missing a lot of hardware, from M4s to drones from the US

  • @dan-dhillon
    @dan-dhillon 2 года назад +3

    It's a good start, I hope we send a lot more.

  • @MrDDiRusso
    @MrDDiRusso 2 года назад +31

    The 28 inch barrelled Mossberg 500 shot gun is used for water fowl hunting and is not used by the military. The reference in this video is misleading.

    • @HansTheGreatestApocPlayer
      @HansTheGreatestApocPlayer 2 года назад +2

      Is also used in urban warfare to break doors

    • @MrDDiRusso
      @MrDDiRusso 2 года назад +8

      @@HansTheGreatestApocPlayer short barreled shotguns are used for door breaching.

    • @nathaneverson3262
      @nathaneverson3262 2 года назад +12

      The long barrel ups the range by a mile, wow! Its a sniper and a shotgun lol

    • @bravoA-su8xm
      @bravoA-su8xm 2 года назад +4

      long barrels good for shooting down scout drones

    • @Carminocat
      @Carminocat 2 года назад +1

      Waterfowl, wtf are you talking about? In urban warfare give me a shotgun...

  • @bobthompson4319
    @bobthompson4319 2 года назад +22

    The CLU is the command launch unit that is the box with sight that the missile is strapped onto. And the US Army developed a new CLU as an improvement over the Block I version. The new CLU is 70 percent smaller, 40 percent lighter, and has a 50 percent battery life increase. Features of the lightweight CLU are: a long-wave IR sensor; a high-definition display with improved resolution; integrated handgrips; a five megapixel color camera; a laser point that can be seen visibly or through IR; a far target locator using GPS, a laser rangefinder, a heading sensor, and modernized electronics. The LWCLU has also demonstrated the ability to fire an FIM-92 Stinger, utilizing its superior optics with the anti-aircraft missile to identify and destroy small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). But the block 1 is the one given to the Ukraine military. But the block 1 is capable of being used against low flying helicopters as well when used in direct fire mode.

    • @tigerboy60
      @tigerboy60 2 года назад

      Maybe your information will help the Communist.

    • @bobthompson4319
      @bobthompson4319 2 года назад +5

      @@tigerboy60 ya sure because they wouldn't think to read that exact paragraph word for word on wiki. smh DUH

  • @PIO793
    @PIO793 5 месяцев назад +1

    👍👍👍
    so cool

  • @hendrikvanderwalt5866
    @hendrikvanderwalt5866 2 года назад +3

    I'm really respect usa to help Ukraine.... 👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏Russia strong to strong..... RUSSIA BROTHER AND SISTER'S IN ARM'S WON'T STAND BACK... 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👈👈👈👈NO WAR..... 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @captainawesome2480
    @captainawesome2480 2 года назад +2

    Anyone else notice they said the range of a Mossberg 500 shotgun is over a mile? 7:07 I'm just trying to imagine shooting a rifled slug one mile. Think how little energy would it have and how high you would have to point. Remember ½MV² and the fact it's not going extremely fast to begin with, as well as you are grouping at best 2.5 minutes of angle with most being around 4-5 minutes.
    Now add the fact how at she mentioned the barrel being choked which would imply they aren't using slugs. So now at best you would be using some really fast buckshot. If someone knows, what is the longest shot attempted with buckshot? I strongly doubt anyone has attempted anything past 200 yards but I could be wrong.
    As sad as the reason this video has been able to be made is, the shotgun part has made my day. Thank you.
    Thoughts and prayers to the people of Ukraine! Hang in there!

    • @Largo5441
      @Largo5441 2 года назад +1

      May be 0.1 mile

    • @AllanMogensen
      @AllanMogensen 2 года назад

      They would be handy in house to house combat when they move in

    • @sillasaram9121
      @sillasaram9121 2 года назад

      Must've meant 10 meters. Or 1 meter really CQC

  • @sonar357
    @sonar357 2 года назад +10

    The mossbergs sent wouldn’t have a 28in barrel, but an 18” barrel. They’d also be used inclose quarter urban fights (such as tunnels or inside buildings) by anyone with minimal training

    • @joelgilmer45
      @joelgilmer45 2 года назад

      I think they sent the 590A-1.
      Basically a modern trench gun.

    • @MeanLaQueefa
      @MeanLaQueefa 2 года назад

      With compressed copper rounds or birdshot for taking doors of the hinges and locks 🔒

  • @cbm2156
    @cbm2156 2 года назад +4

    They need more of the Stingers and Javelin Missiles to use against Russian planes and tanks.

  • @MarcHillM
    @MarcHillM 2 года назад +8

    I believe the US and UK have also delivered ration packs. These could include self-heating rations, invaluable for operations behind RU lines. There's an old adage an army goes to war on its stomach more so in freezing temperatures.

    • @josephcernansky1794
      @josephcernansky1794 2 года назад

      and those Russian vehicles have no fuel....they see they are not running...thus NO heat in the winter!! One would think the Russians would think about staying warm in the winter to fight?!!

    • @MeanLaQueefa
      @MeanLaQueefa 2 года назад

      Underrated comment. This is very important, those MREs are packed with calories and heat up with a few ounces of water. You can also use the heating bags for anti personal bombs, in Iraq they called them ankle breakers.

    • @rogerdildeau7507
      @rogerdildeau7507 2 года назад

      More money for the MIC!

  • @davebuko8096
    @davebuko8096 2 года назад +4

    Send more anti tank and anti air weapons fast!!!!

  • @CuriousRandy
    @CuriousRandy 2 года назад +4

    I think all Ukrainians appreciate any help provided by the people of the world in the fight for democracy and its values.
    I just wanted to thank you and your governments for helping my country to have a chance of defending itself.
    I just hope we'll also get anti-aircraft weapons as well soon as biggest threat now comes from the sky - russia has overwhelming number of aircraft and guided missiles that hit both military and civilian building killing tens of people every time.
    But be sure Ukrainians will remember any help provided to us and will show gratitude in any possible way.

  • @HolyTADOKORO
    @HolyTADOKORO 2 года назад +8

    It looks like the Javelin missiles have destroyed the Russian T-80BVM.

    • @mwtrolle
      @mwtrolle 2 года назад

      I have seen videos of a lot of destroyed T-72's I would expect most are T-72B3's but also at least one T-90.

  • @Erik-rp1hi
    @Erik-rp1hi 2 года назад +8

    There is a lot more coming as of today. 500 Stingers alone from Germany which was a hold out. I wonder if the heavy mechanize divisions of Putin's army is not in the fight yet because of these hard to find man portable weapons. Javelins are in big supply too.

  • @timopkokko
    @timopkokko 2 года назад

    Thank you, the United States of America! All those equipment is needed.

    • @timopkokko
      @timopkokko 2 года назад

      The Ukrainians are causing immense damage too, darlings. In my personal opinion, the Russians got it wrong at the beginning, from the tactical and strategic pov. Well, what do I know?
      ruclips.net/video/mhbSp_-w8CA/видео.html
      I trust the communication from the Ukraine intelligence more, not so much from the Russian information as they shut down all free media.

  • @sapperfirefox2100
    @sapperfirefox2100 2 года назад +3

    It’s Going to be a good year for American weapon makers

    • @RedBaronlives
      @RedBaronlives 2 года назад

      Right? any guesses as to which of our elected officials own stock in Lockheed and Raytheon?

    • @sapperfirefox2100
      @sapperfirefox2100 2 года назад

      @@RedBaronlives prolly the same ilk

  • @farqsideways5679
    @farqsideways5679 2 года назад +4

    Never seen a shotgun hit a target at 1 mile.

  • @AaronChevy-ks8eb
    @AaronChevy-ks8eb 2 года назад +5

    Imagine all the supplies that were left in Afghanistan you could of used over in Ukraine.

    • @jjj1951
      @jjj1951 2 года назад

      That is incorrect

    • @joshuablair252
      @joshuablair252 2 года назад

      @@jjj1951 wrong. It's a very misleading lie that all of that stuff was destroyed. Very little of it was. They were given orders to leave, as soon as it hit the news and made our administration look bad, they lied about all of that stuff being destroyed.

    • @Protolamna
      @Protolamna 2 года назад

      Lots of Humvees, machine guns, a few prop plans and helicopters. Imagine it would be a lot of redundant equipment for them to be honest. The goodies the Taliban got are mainly useful for fighting insurgents and what not. At least we're not tied down over there while the Ukraine thing is cooking.

    • @RhodokTribesman
      @RhodokTribesman 2 года назад

      @Joe Barone ??? Trump was planning on leaving 2 months earlier than Biden

    • @davidroyston7397
      @davidroyston7397 2 года назад

      trump was dismantling NATO, and screwing over Ukraine.

  • @erabbitgamingofficial1
    @erabbitgamingofficial1 2 года назад +2

    The Javelin has been the most useful

  • @BostonHarbor713
    @BostonHarbor713 2 года назад +4

    Have any anti personnel and tank mines been delivered?

    • @floatingchimney
      @floatingchimney 2 года назад +1

      @Keith Short, Anti personnel mines are banned by the Geneva convention.
      Anti tank mines are simple devices - I'm sure they have plenty of them. Although they're not as useful as you think.

  • @georgewilliam8666
    @georgewilliam8666 Год назад

    I'm grateful for the relentless support

  • @ottopartz1
    @ottopartz1 2 года назад +11

    I thought that the military versions of the Mossberg had 14"&18-1/2" barrels and was intended to be carried as a secondary weapon.

    • @victoria19853
      @victoria19853 2 года назад +1

      It depends on the mission parameters I know a guy who served in Afghanistan and Iraq and he told me he had to use a mossberg as a primary weapon. Some times he had to carry it as a secondary on top of his load out gear.

    • @monkeymouse1403
      @monkeymouse1403 2 года назад +2

      You would typically have a soldier or two in a platoon carry a shotgun if you are in CQB combat, otherwise it is slung as a secondary.

    • @Weedss74
      @Weedss74 2 года назад +2

      They probably have them to shoot drones with now more than doors

    • @Weedss74
      @Weedss74 2 года назад +1

      @@victoria19853 they could be used to protect trenches from flying suicide drones

    • @kikas990
      @kikas990 2 года назад +1

      @@victoria19853 Depende muito da munição , na frente em guerrilha é altamente eficaz,

  • @Алекс-ч1л1с
    @Алекс-ч1л1с 2 года назад +1

    Спасибо США за помощь! Слава Украинец!

  • @michaelneuwirth3414
    @michaelneuwirth3414 2 года назад +5

    Hi Buzz, great work as always!
    Can you post a video about the artillery, tanks and vehicles' that the Russian invaders are currently using in Ukraine?
    Thanks!

  • @MeanLaQueefa
    @MeanLaQueefa 2 года назад

    In my state, Wisconsin an ammo company is sending 1,000,000 rounds of polymer tipped 7.62x39

  • @Chris-oh2jq
    @Chris-oh2jq 2 года назад +34

    The US has given the Ukraine almost as many weapons as we gave the Taliban. Lol

    • @Archer89201
      @Archer89201 2 года назад +1

      @Hendrix Cody taliban got ballistic vests, modern assault rifles with optics, tons of ammo , sniper rifles and NVGs. Also Isis and al Qaeda got TOW missiles and other weapons via Timber Sycamore

    • @Archer89201
      @Archer89201 2 года назад

      @Hendrix Cody javelins and stingers can't stop artillery raining down on them nor reach them. The Russians can use cheap drones for target acquisition or simply fly above the stingers engagement zone like they did in Syria where Isis and al nusra also had Manpads like stingers, iglas and QW-2s

    • @Archer89201
      @Archer89201 2 года назад

      @Hendrix Cody they have thousands of cheap drones with cameras and laser designators, they cost some hundred to thousand bucks, you shooting javelin and stinger at that gives the Russians your location and unlike those two, artillery removes the entire gridsquares from the map. Javelin's have range under 10km, the artillery will be firing from 50km away.

    • @Archer89201
      @Archer89201 2 года назад

      @Hendrix Cody I guess it's useless talking to someone who can't even spell guerrilla warfare correctly even with auto correct and internet access. Stinger is a Manpad(short range and altitude) Russians can fly out of it's range and still bomb them. Also digging in allows Russians to pin point the location via satellite and other ELINT assets that they have and just hit it with cruise missiles and MLRS like they are doing right now as we speak. They have weapon locating radars and artillery attached with recon assets to hit the stinger/javelin teams and when they fire they don't shoot one missile but a barrage of shells and rockets with cluster ammunition that will flatten an entire square mile radius. I'm not saying Russians are invincible but thinking some short range system will stop them completely is idiotic. As for guerrilla warfare, they have thousands of troops with counterinsurgency experience in Chechnya and Syria, it's not new to them. They will not make the mistakes of 1st chechen war and go into big cities with unescorted convoys, they don't need to; it's easier to hit the military infrastructure and just fix and hit the troop concentration like they did in Georgia and Eastern Ukraine in 2015. They don't need to capture whole of Ukraine but just make a buffer with the eastern republics and stop their integration with Nato like they have achieved in Georgia

    • @zeblanmaidaynovich796
      @zeblanmaidaynovich796 2 года назад +1

      Russia and PRORussian soil said thx these are already in are arms reality fact that's why Crimea and Donbas is Russia for 7+ years and now whole Ukraine will be😂😃😆

  • @ycplum7062
    @ycplum7062 2 года назад +28

    The shotgun would be extremely effective in uban CQ (close quarter) Combat, especially for those with minimal firearms experience. However, it won.t be hitting anything a mile away. You would be a very good (and lucky) shooter if you can hit a mansize target 200 yards away with a slug round.
    I am a bit surprised they were not given some claymore mines. They are good against infantry and soft vehicles.

    • @Carminocat
      @Carminocat 2 года назад +5

      As you said the shotgun is extremely effective close range......its intended purpose....don't over think it.

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 года назад +3

      Latest generation sniper rifles have been delivered to Ukraine from many countries now. As has been stated, the shotgun is only useful for its intended purpose ... short range.

    • @ycplum7062
      @ycplum7062 2 года назад +3

      @@tunahxushi4669
      Not denying that sniper rifles (or even hunting rifles) would be helpful, but shotguns have a shorter learning curve for those not familiar with guns. Ukraine really do not have much time available for training.

    • @tunahxushi4669
      @tunahxushi4669 2 года назад +3

      @@ycplum7062 .. Correct, but training is still necessary. I would say after a few days though a competent person could get reasonably good at it. It's not like in the movies though where anyone can be just given a gun. So people could get very proficient with a shotgun within a week, that would be devastating to any Russians in a room.

    • @peka2478
      @peka2478 2 года назад +1

      @@tunahxushi4669 while anyone can be taught to shoot a shotgun rather quickly, it takes quite a brave person, and a lot more of training, to be calm and concentrated and disciplined in close quarters against professional military (even if its just conscripts), no?

  • @applejack2911
    @applejack2911 2 года назад +30

    Nice letting the enemy know what weapons they have, wow geniuses

    • @geraldmiller8973
      @geraldmiller8973 2 года назад +2

      and she can't even correctly speak the english language.

    • @cheekysodful
      @cheekysodful 2 года назад +7

      Don't worry that's just tip of the iceberg (there is plenty that you don't know), plus access to intelligence!!

    • @applejack2911
      @applejack2911 2 года назад +3

      @@cheekysodful I hope so, cause they gonna need it. I have Ukrainian friends,.good people.

    • @bdgctruz5786
      @bdgctruz5786 2 года назад

      This person is dumb but yea theres alotta things that we dk that our governments sent but tbh those javelin’s are gonna absolutely destroy russian ground vehicles mainly because when a javelin is fired it goes up into the air then down on top where tanks or any armored vehicles dont have era or armor those laws the brits sent will destroy light armor like bmps the m249 saws don’t really need any explanation besides its a saw thats thing will lay down heavy supressing fire as for the shot guns … why???? I get they’re cheap and useful but its still a close range gun unless they’re firing slugs and the 40 mike mike makes me giggle like a kid because ik how effec they are against infantry

    • @rlewis1946
      @rlewis1946 2 года назад +1

      @@geraldmiller8973 I think she is a computer reader voice.

  • @Иванпонимаете-г4ш
    @Иванпонимаете-г4ш 2 года назад +1

    They need to make IEDs for those convoys

  • @peterking8586
    @peterking8586 2 года назад +16

    It’s one thing to transfer weapon, but without adequate training it’s useless.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 года назад +1

      CIA and special forces have been training Ukraine ever since Crimea:)
      But still not enough trainers though to train an entire country for civil war

    • @chrisb9238
      @chrisb9238 2 года назад +4

      Javelin, Stinger, etc are very very easy to use.

    • @floatingchimney
      @floatingchimney 2 года назад

      @@chrisb9238 They are easy to OPERATE, but that doesn't mean they are easy to USE EFFECTIVELY.
      Javelin is fairly simple, but there's a lot of fine nuances in shooting down helicopters and planes with heat seeking ground-air missiles.
      Stinger operators need good training to know how and when to engage targets to optimally secure a good hit. Not every missile guarantees a hit regardless of whether you hear the lock tone buzzing. It's not that simple as just point and shoot when it comes to Stingers.

  • @FranktheDachshund
    @FranktheDachshund 2 года назад +2

    Looks like a great combination except for the pump shotguns. Things are getting close if you are pulling out the 12 gauge.

    • @Curtis69213
      @Curtis69213 2 года назад

      CQC. May be bracing for urban warfare

    • @jdogdiesel7242
      @jdogdiesel7242 2 года назад +2

      True... In the city's I'm sure there is and will be alot of close encounters... I'd say send them anything that might help !!!

  • @robertschultz6922
    @robertschultz6922 2 года назад +4

    Slava Ukrainia

  • @starlightbarking9495
    @starlightbarking9495 2 года назад +1

    It’s good that they sent these weapons back in January

  • @samallen3006
    @samallen3006 2 года назад +8

    I See America hasn't learned it's lesson about send weapons and ammo. I guarantee it will all end up in Russia or rebels hands. We created a modern taliban army now let's help create a well supplied rebel army.

  • @davidreece1642
    @davidreece1642 2 года назад

    Good job!

  • @donwaters2022
    @donwaters2022 2 года назад +4

    That is less than a tenth of what we gave the Taliban!

  • @eriks7405
    @eriks7405 2 года назад +1

    Those javelin did hit the russian troops in the nuts.

  • @phdcinnabar5754
    @phdcinnabar5754 2 года назад +17

    Did anyone else hear her say the extended shotgun barrel increased its range by a mile and the choke increased its accuracy even further.lol😂, how did that not sound stupid to her when she said it or to the editors when they researched over and over for editing.

    • @barneycalhoundotcom
      @barneycalhoundotcom 2 года назад

      I agree, pistol can't even shoot for shit for a mile!

    • @robincondite
      @robincondite 2 года назад

      I don't know what you're talking about. I can hit with a shotgun at a mile... Only kidding! Came to the comments section hoping someone else had called this out. 👍

    • @Songer80
      @Songer80 2 года назад

      I think the metric to imperial measurements confused them

    • @stevedallas9529
      @stevedallas9529 2 года назад +1

      I was listening to her sexy voice what did she say?

  • @chrisb9238
    @chrisb9238 2 года назад +2

    Happy to see they sent Stingers

  • @admoest1678
    @admoest1678 2 года назад +4

    From the Netherlands 200 Stingers and 100 sniper rifles. Problem is getting them there (we were ttotototo late as usual)

    • @qawwss2000
      @qawwss2000 2 года назад

      The Dutch have the means to drop that cargo there in a matter of hours.

  • @bobthompson4319
    @bobthompson4319 2 года назад +9

    1:08 WOW and now they need 10Xs that 7.62x51 and 10Xs the javelins as well.
    EDIT: I didnt know they have receved 1000 javelin missiles, 10s of 1000s maybe 100s of 1000s of 7.62 nato and also m141 bunker buster rockets and 100s of MK-19 gl machine guns and grenades stinger missiles and good ole american mossberg pump 12 ga shotguns.

    • @roceye
      @roceye 2 года назад +2

      Now they need stand off weapon systems to engage those Russian convoys.

    • @seanavp
      @seanavp 2 года назад +1

      @@roceye *So true - that would be great, destroying them at a safer distance.*

  • @TraderRobin
    @TraderRobin 2 года назад +3

    I love how the Ukrainians were able to stop that 40 mile long Russian military convoy, by simply switching all the traffic lights RED!! Baaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    • @dubbleplusgood
      @dubbleplusgood 2 года назад

      "Somebody's gotta go back and get a sh**load of dimes!" Bonus points if you know which movie that's from.

  • @64MDW
    @64MDW 2 года назад

    Outstanding. The more the better.

  • @rancheroskitchenph8882
    @rancheroskitchenph8882 2 года назад +6

    New scoop for the media ...theyre longing for big news and who sees it first

  • @JM-gj7de
    @JM-gj7de 2 года назад +2

    $86 billion worth of military equipment left behind in Afghanistan. Let that sink in.

    • @Protolamna
      @Protolamna 2 года назад

      Imagine if we stayed there we'd probably spend another trillion on nothing

    • @JM-gj7de
      @JM-gj7de 2 года назад

      @@Protolamna Yep.

  • @scottprather5645
    @scottprather5645 2 года назад +4

    Russia is going to pay a terrible price for this unprovoked aggression against Ukraine

  • @IrnMaiden304
    @IrnMaiden304 2 года назад +2

    @ 7:10 " The 28 inch barrel increases the range by a mile, and the double beads and choked barrel improve the accuracy even further " ..... what !?! 🤨

    • @IrnMaiden304
      @IrnMaiden304 2 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/F42Bsc8YtnU/видео.html

  • @mikemorris1760
    @mikemorris1760 2 года назад +4

    COME ON MAN!
    How about a list of weapons we left behind in Afghanistan?

    • @davidroyston7397
      @davidroyston7397 2 года назад

      You mean the old shit surrendered by the Afghan military without a fight....

  • @GreatRetro
    @GreatRetro 2 года назад +1

    Daaamn, that was just on time shipments!!! But Ukraine need more I'm sure!

  • @stevenveltrie1868
    @stevenveltrie1868 2 года назад +3

    Hopefully none these items were NOT stored in large ammo dumps that were taken out on day one.

    • @Songer80
      @Songer80 2 года назад +1

      So true. You would think they would of distributed the weapons days before as Russia started amassing its forces on the border.

    • @michaelprobert4014
      @michaelprobert4014 2 года назад

      You mean , I think , that you "hope none of these items were stored in large ammo dumps "or you "hope these item were not stored in large ammo dumps ." I cant work out if you are trolling with what you wrote.

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 2 года назад

    thank - you .

  • @fugoogle8907
    @fugoogle8907 2 года назад +5

    The 85 Billion in weapons the US left when they unconditionally surrendered Afghanistan and fled in incompetence could have turned the tide in the Ukraine conflict... Democrats fail at so many levels it's hard to add them up.

    • @nipponsuxs
      @nipponsuxs 2 года назад +4

      Hey dummy Iraq Gulf Afganistan wars all started under a republican president

  • @gurkagurkadurka6688
    @gurkagurkadurka6688 2 года назад

    More. Send them more. They're putting it to good use.

  • @tewlyx
    @tewlyx 2 года назад +3

    enemy of an enemy is allied but if they kill each other its GOOD.

    • @vladislavgorshkov737
      @vladislavgorshkov737 2 года назад +1

      yeah i am always thinking what if russia and usa self annihilate and let other world live in peace

  • @VideoNash
    @VideoNash 2 года назад

    thanks

  • @tocu9808
    @tocu9808 2 года назад +4

    Send them Archer autoloaded rapid firing 155mm Howitzers with Excalibur and BONUS shells.

  • @joelgalvan8358
    @joelgalvan8358 2 года назад

    It's a good start, keep adding more weapons

  • @davepeters4955
    @davepeters4955 2 года назад +4

    Umm, you are not hitting anything 1 mile or even 1km away with a Mossberg 500/590 series shotgun. It's a 100m weapon at best, usually sub 50m. It's a great weapon within its' limits but it's not a sniper rifle.

    • @Curtis69213
      @Curtis69213 2 года назад

      In Close quarter Combat, it’s brutal

    • @davidanalyst671
      @davidanalyst671 2 года назад +1

      yeah... whoever wrote this hassssss never fired a shotgun before? lolz

  • @pdxmack
    @pdxmack 2 года назад +1

    1000 Javelins with a 94% kill ratio means at least 900 vehicles will be destroyed. Tanks, trucks and APCs are not cheap.

  • @Archer89201
    @Archer89201 2 года назад +17

    All this is good but won't address the main arm of the Russian military, their overwhelming artillery. They will fix the positions via drones and recon and then plaster the grid square with cluster and thermobaric MLRS and Tube artillery salvoes like they did in Debaltsevo

    • @sakkiestoffberg4052
      @sakkiestoffberg4052 2 года назад

      They don’t even need drones….. there are more than enough collaborators eager to cooperate.

    • @jimhamman2335
      @jimhamman2335 2 года назад

      Imagine what a few Warthogs could do those Russian convoys...

    • @sakkiestoffberg4052
      @sakkiestoffberg4052 2 года назад

      @@jimhamman2335 sitting ducks, all of them….and they cannot even fight back.

    • @davidroyston7397
      @davidroyston7397 2 года назад

      Your praise of the great Russian army doesn't seem to be playing out.....

    • @Archer89201
      @Archer89201 2 года назад

      @@davidroyston7397 the men and material loss had been horrendous and the general plan of the Russians seem stupid, but if you believe whole heartedly the kill count of the Ukrainians as they say whole heartedly that would be stupid to say the least. The Russians have performed terribly, I will be the first to admit it , but it had not been complete fairytale for the Urkrainians either or there wouldn't be call for more arms, foreign fighters and now the latest no fly zones either

  • @alexandermarinin7036
    @alexandermarinin7036 2 года назад +1

    Now we need body armours, night vision, scopes. And more Stingers, if you please :)

  • @Beelzerat
    @Beelzerat 2 года назад +9

    How about we keep it simple. We have tons of M79 Bloopers that fire 40mm grenades. They are easy to use and you can't break them. M14s are one of the best battle rifles in the world. They fire the same round as the M60. What happened to the "Redeye" MANPAD, the precursor to the Stinger. We have to have a few of those laying around. According to the films, they were pretty accurate and could be devastating to helicopters. Even simpler, what about tank traps. Ukraine has backhoes and bulldozers. Dig in. Dig traps. These are tactics that go back a hundred years. You might want to think about the higher-end drones that you can pick up at Walmart. I know that sounds funny, but we have fun bombing our friends with everything laying around. These drones are cheap, easy to fly and operate, and can hold three or four grenades. Have fun.

    • @jyralnadreth4442
      @jyralnadreth4442 2 года назад

      FIM 43 Redeye pretty much all got scrapped after Stinger supplanted it, Production was terminated at 85,000 rounds in 1969 and by 1995 the last Redeyes were dismantled from stocks. Redeye was also far more vulnerable to countermeasures like flares as it was a cooled IR seeker with very limited forward aspect seeking which was dependent of conditions and the version of missile used. The Missile was also limited to a maximum of 3G's overload....which is very poor. Stinger FIM 92 from the B model onwards used IR/UV contrast seekers to reject countermeasures and the latest J (Infantry) and K (Vehicle Launched) versions have Proximity fuses. The Japanese Type 91 Kai MANPAD has an even more advanced Seeker head with Thermal Imaging making it a 4th Gen MAPADs...StingerRMP Block 2 was going to have this seeker type but was cancelled by the DoD in 2002

    • @Beelzerat
      @Beelzerat 2 года назад

      @@jyralnadreth4442 My point was that we have all kinds of outdated munitions that could be shipped to the Ukrainians, and since they are older and simpler, the training time would be less. Too bad about the Redeye. No matter what its failings, it would be a tough road to fly into a nest of those things.

    • @Beelzerat
      @Beelzerat 2 года назад

      @LTC I must have gotten a good one as the accuracy, even through the iron sights is satisfactory, and my attention to detail in the field when it comes to babying a weapon leaves a lot to be desired. The ease of takedown and maintenance is easy and you can get access to any part that could fail. I don't know about the lifespan of the barrel, as I can only guess how many boxes I have fired through that thing. There is also the fact that it wasn't in service long enough to get any bugs out, which you may be aware all battle systems have. It fires the 7.62-51 round, which is a nice infantry round, more so in AP with motorized opponents. I load a few less than a full mag and have never had a problem with jamming. Weight was the only thing that I could consider as being a drawback, but you get stronger.

    • @BrianDuffie
      @BrianDuffie Год назад

      M14s were seen in use in the Ukraine,we also sent artillery

  • @MrWinstonSmith
    @MrWinstonSmith 2 года назад

    Very informative

  • @johnknapp952
    @johnknapp952 2 года назад +4

    If you're going to send NATO ammo (7.62mm) at least send the guns that can use it. I would think the Ukrainians still use a lot of the old Soviet guns (AK-47's, AKM's) so sending over old stocks from Poland/E Germany and such would be better (if it's still good).

    • @swaghauler8334
      @swaghauler8334 2 года назад +1

      Poland's right next door. Have them give all their old "PACT" stuff that they have in mothballs to Ukraine and we replace it with NATO stuff from our own mothballs. We have THOUSANDS of Tanks and Artillery pieces in storage from the Cold War (just in case) that we could upgrade Poland with. I would do this because the Poles and the Czechs have been staunch US allies and I would see their defenses bolstered... just in case.

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 2 года назад +1

      If you are wondering Poland can convert worn out Ukrainian PKMs 7.62x54R using UKM-2000 parts therefore converting PKM 7.62x54R into 7.62x51 NATO. Heavy machine guns you're looking at the NSV uncoverted and .50 cal version the WKM-B. Pretty much Poland has been manufacturing Warsaw Pact equipment converted to NATO Ammo. Tantal 5.45x39 later improved as the Beryl

    • @jimhamman2335
      @jimhamman2335 2 года назад +2

      A few scoped Remington 700s in .308/7.62x51 would be nice for those longer shots...

  • @stealth42blade
    @stealth42blade 2 года назад +1

    Wait, we sent shotguns over ????
    Oh shit, its about get wild over there

  • @shahruzpakzad8603
    @shahruzpakzad8603 2 года назад +4

    Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦

    • @rogerdildeau7507
      @rogerdildeau7507 2 года назад

      Glory to the US Military Industrial Complex!

  • @roostersideburns3440
    @roostersideburns3440 2 года назад +2

    interesting the bomb disposal suit doesnt protect hands..guess you wont be needing those.

  • @howiescott5865
    @howiescott5865 2 года назад +41

    Now I understand why there's such an ammunition shortage here in the US.

    • @pyrotarkus
      @pyrotarkus 2 года назад +1

      @Dummy Tree H. Trump not true at all. We only prevent criminals from having a gun . I live in Texas we are well armed here.

    • @zeblanmaidaynovich796
      @zeblanmaidaynovich796 2 года назад +1

      Russia and PRORussian soil said thx these are already in are arms reality fact that's why Crimea and Donbas is Russia for 7+ years and now whole Ukraine will be😂😃😆

    • @igoranisimov6549
      @igoranisimov6549 2 года назад +2

      True, I went to gun show and could not find any javelins.

    • @realone2321
      @realone2321 2 года назад +1

      I live in communist California

    • @ghcatzen
      @ghcatzen 2 года назад

      do you need rockets and shit for yourself xD ?