The Witcher 3 - Xbox Series X|S / PS5 / PC - Graphics & FPS & Power Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2022
  • Already extensively covered by the known channels, just wanted to bring my version of this comparison. My notes for this video:
    - Series S offers two modes of which they don’t seem to be really dynamic. Performance mode: 1080P and Quality mode: 1440P.
    - Series S is missing new features likes RT
    - Series X and PS5 offers a performance mode and a RT mode. Both having dynamic resolutions.
    -Series X and PS5 seem to have the same DRS ranges, however PS5’s DRS was more aggressive and Series X counted higher most of the time
    - Performance for PS5 RT mode is less stable than it seems to be on Series X at this point in time
    - PS5 was consuming significantly more power
    - While Series X did seem to perform better there are some reduced settings compared to PS5
    - PC: Ultra vs RT Ultra presets, RT Ultra changes everything from Ultra to Ultra+ and enables raytracing for PC. For this combination of hardware 4K with everything maxed out it is not the best experience, you'll need to drop some settings or lower resolution. Ultra preset sits at around 45% GPU utilisation
    - PC FPS footage is recorded externally to have all available resources available for the game, there is still an issue with the colours of these recordings. I think that after this video I finally figured out how to fix colour differences on PC when recording externally, should be fixed in the next video including PC FPS footage - basically forcing YUV420 with Limited range though Nvidia control panel to my external recorder. This was the last grow pain after my workload automation and switching to OBS recordings. Bare with me as these are the last bits to get everything sorted out.
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 68

  • @lordmaster2562
    @lordmaster2562 Год назад +19

    Ps5 is clearly to weak for the 30 fps ray tracing mode. Frames dropping like crazy. Series x almost steady 30

    • @3450P
      @3450P Год назад +5

      XSX too weak for the 60 fps mode.

    • @lordmaster2562
      @lordmaster2562 Год назад +4

      @@3450P ps5 dropping frames 5 6 even 7 everywhere. Xbox sometimes 1 lol. Good luck playing every game like crap compared to Xbox . PlayStation console is inferior sinds Xbox One X vs ps4 pro

    • @3450P
      @3450P Год назад +6

      @@lordmaster2562 why every? Elden Ring works better on PS5, Callisto Protocol works better on PS5 too etc. Many games plays better on Sony system, this is fact. Difference between One X and PS4 Pro is huuuge, but difference between PS5 and XSX is minimal.

    • @user-sp8fi2zv2v
      @user-sp8fi2zv2v Год назад

      Goddamn, what a bullshit you talk 🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♂️ It's bad optimization, you smartass.
      Also go and watch the DF video - PS5 has better shadows, vegetation and draw distance in this mode - which is why the PS5 version is heavier.
      Here is the video: ruclips.net/video/XTAVw_rjv94/видео.html

    • @saucemasterx911
      @saucemasterx911 Год назад

      @@lordmaster2562 lol are you blind. Enjoy being a fawkboi

  • @loffredokevin1417
    @loffredokevin1417 Год назад +3

    La pièce d'ingénierie que représente la Série X est surprenante : consommation électrique/bruit/calories maitrisés et ce même si les résultats ne sont pas encore à la hauteur.

  • @yannischatziioannidis7650
    @yannischatziioannidis7650 Год назад +9

    Wtf... the PS5 consumes round about 40 Watts more that xbox. That's around 20% more power than xbox

    • @user-sp8fi2zv2v
      @user-sp8fi2zv2v Год назад +3

      The fact that the PS5 consumes more power has long been known. And it's frustrating, my UPS can't handle PS5 in heavy games 😑

    • @JudeTheYoutubePoopersubscribe
      @JudeTheYoutubePoopersubscribe Год назад +3

      It's because the gpu is clocked significantly higher I suspect.

    • @marekrolinec2079
      @marekrolinec2079 Год назад +1

      Meanwhile its like half of the power of series s (70-80W) lol.

    • @JudeTheYoutubePoopersubscribe
      @JudeTheYoutubePoopersubscribe Год назад +1

      @@marekrolinec2079 that's why I won't upgrade my console, it costs me almost nothing to run my series S even with the crazy energy prices right now.

    • @marekrolinec2079
      @marekrolinec2079 Год назад +1

      @@JudeTheRUclipsPoopersubscribe true that.

  • @teddym2808
    @teddym2808 Год назад +3

    Would have been very useful, to say the least, to know what GPU is being used on PC.. kind of a ridiculous omission.

    • @ajgamingcomparisons
      @ajgamingcomparisons  Год назад +1

      I guess I forgot to add it to the description. All used hardware and software is al written down on the about page of the channel. PC specific is 12900K, 3900Ti, DDR5 64GB 5200, Z690 chipset, WD Black SN850 2TB NVMe.

    • @teddym2808
      @teddym2808 Год назад +1

      @@ajgamingcomparisons Ok thanks, so, very powerful indeed. Total console annihilator! My apologies.

    • @ajgamingcomparisons
      @ajgamingcomparisons  Год назад +1

      No apologies needed, really. Take care.

  • @kakagamerzone
    @kakagamerzone Год назад +16

    Series S 1440/30
    Series X 1440/30 RT
    PS5 1440/30 RT
    Series S is Amazing

    • @saucemasterx911
      @saucemasterx911 Год назад +1

      Series s is a great bang for the buck. I wish it had a detachable disc drive tho

    • @trashboat..
      @trashboat.. Год назад

      ​​@@saucemasterx911 hopefully in the future if ps makes a ps5 slim with the detachable disk drive Xbox will make one for series s

  • @3450P
    @3450P Год назад +6

    Interesting, why this game did not use XSX at full power, looks like PS5 has better developer tools.

    • @JLeandroCS
      @JLeandroCS Год назад +3

      PS5 memory it's more faster

    • @3450P
      @3450P Год назад +6

      @@JLeandroCS i don't think this is case in old gen game, 10 gb pool on XSX faster than PS5 and 6gb pool still fast enough for this type of game.

    • @JLeandroCS
      @JLeandroCS Год назад +2

      What you say is true, but also, despite the fact that it is an old game, its technologies are new, such as raytracing

    • @bluewave4019
      @bluewave4019 Год назад +7

      @@JLeandroCS ps5 has lower resolution and XSX mostly 40-70% higher resolution than ps5 ..and ps5 cant run it at 30fps even with lower resolution..
      Go watch vg tech video

    • @vicks.577
      @vicks.577 Год назад +2

      @@bluewave4019 And you open your eyes. Series X got much downgraded draw distances compared to PS5 in both modes. Shadows literally appear in front of the player as seen in the DF video, when they are rendered from miles away in the same instance on PS5. Something's seriously wrong with the Series version of the game, SSR are also downgraded.

  • @Red-Revolution708
    @Red-Revolution708 Год назад +3

    Top video again.

  • @kelvinpedrosodasilva2439
    @kelvinpedrosodasilva2439 Год назад +1

    Pra mim está tudo igual

  • @SOTVT
    @SOTVT Год назад +2

    RTGI/AO on consoles is lower than low, the resolution in RT Mode mostly at near 1080p and the game still struggles to hit 30fps. Wtf😅

    • @amnril
      @amnril Год назад +1

      Watching NX Gamers very deep explanation of this game might go a long way in answering your questions.

    • @bluewave4019
      @bluewave4019 Год назад +2

      Ps5 is the only console mostly at 1080p and not even at 30fps.
      XSX is has higher resolution..
      Go watch VG tech analysis video ..
      And for pc what GPU can run it 1440p 60fps ..from what i saw even 3080 cant do it.

    • @amnril
      @amnril Год назад +1

      @@bluewave4019 VG Tech is video only with no commentary on the reasons why RT is so heavy and how it is achieved on the Windows vs Linus based Consoles and why the technique they used was used (I.e. it’s quick and dirty especially for a free update ). VG Tech does none of this.

    • @bluewave4019
      @bluewave4019 Год назад +2

      @@amnril VG tech is a comparisons channel ..
      The only channel that's gives you the average framerate on consoles and the real resolutions.
      They shows that XSX resolution always ahead of ps5 in both modes by 50% more or less at least 15-20fps difference ...no channel gives accurate information.
      It's a comparison channel only ..do you understand that.
      For me that channel and this channel show how Xbox Series X is the best next gen console by far ..
      Especially this video.. ..it show that ps5 can't keep up even with overclocking..
      The first game i saw ps5 goes above 220 all the time most games 190-210 and still far behind XSX and XSX wattage run this game like any other game
      ..all of that with parity in mind .
      That Questioning any game not run better on XSX and shows that parity is real in consoles..plague tales is another perfect example

    • @amnril
      @amnril Год назад +1

      @@bluewave4019 VG tech is a great numbers channel, but it doesn’t go into depth on coding techniques taken to achieve the results. NX Gamer goes into depth on cost vs effort (for what is a FREE update) and what ‘wrappers’ are used for RT and how we are presented with the results we see based on their efforts. We all know if this game was coded from scratch as a brand new project cost unimportant, the results would be a better looking game running far better on both machines. If this game was coded from scratch by separate devs, one exclusive to each platform by the best dev teams available to both then I’d wager the PS version would be the better version. I’m surmising of course but I’m trying to get into your head that the VG numbers for the RT mode is just the tip of the iceberg. Do YOU understand any of that?
      Of course, in the here and now, the RT mode is best on series X, let us hope CPR bother to update the PS version as it needs it.
      Btw, your bullet points above are nonsense and just fan boy twaddle and you clearly don’t understand the power consumption reasons or the tech behind it, we both know the consoles are very close indeed bar a small and often insignificant resolution difference which is hardly detectable. It’s all about the games and in that category the winner is very clear.

  • @Amirshemirani-ns6ln
    @Amirshemirani-ns6ln 6 месяцев назад +1

    100%pc very very very good ❤

  • @oi118
    @oi118 Год назад +4

    Digital Foundry's analysis showed parts of action, where there are bigger drops in performance mode and that the Series X manages to be more stable than the PS5.

    • @MusicInUniverse
      @MusicInUniverse Год назад +3

      And NXGamer showed footage in the city where PS5 often leads by 10 fps in the performance mode.

  • @JJ-fb4ud
    @JJ-fb4ud Год назад +1

    Its sucks PC has better FPS and GFX

    • @Amonny
      @Amonny 8 месяцев назад

      It has, but if you have a 400 bucks PC it will struggle. A mediocre PC will be able to run it with everything on almost full, with no RT.

    • @N.D.9.7
      @N.D.9.7 7 месяцев назад

      Don't care