Interesting comparison but isn't cutting a piece of wire or tubing very different from a branch? I cannot see how the cutting or force test has any relevance to the use case of pruners which is cutting timber branches which have long fibres unlike metal or tubing. And again attempting to blunt a blade with steel rather than its use case doesn't make much sense to me. Otherwise it is interesting to see how well the ARS performed.
Who paid for this contribution? Your conclusion that the winner is not the technically best but the one that is lower in price makes your "findings" questionable. Why spend 11 minutes of viewers' time if you already know that price will be more important than Swiss quality?
Thanks - I'm going to try both your #2 and #3 blades. I do like Felco, but I frequently misplace them in the garden. Keep up the good work.
Damn dude ya gotta do more of these, im intrigued to who else is screwing us out of good quality that we need to get the job done
Interesting comparison but isn't cutting a piece of wire or tubing very different from a branch? I cannot see how the cutting or force test has any relevance to the use case of pruners which is cutting timber branches which have long fibres unlike metal or tubing. And again attempting to blunt a blade with steel rather than its use case doesn't make much sense to me. Otherwise it is interesting to see how well the ARS performed.
This is a good video. Got a slight error in the last segment. Take a look.
Good job. Keep this up and you will give ProjectFarm a run for his money. :)
The best pruners are the ones someone else uses to do the pruning for you.
Bloody 'ell! For that matter, you can say that about every tool ever made, including a fork, knife and spoon.
Gardina prunners. I seen assisted cutting pair for 89quid
A couple going out to dinner costs more than Felcos.
Good review
You said that Fiskars was one of the top two at then end instead of Felco. LOL
That happens if the criteria that decide the winner are known before testing. Always ask - who paid for the tests.
Google Japanese secateurs
Who paid for this contribution? Your conclusion that the winner is not the technically best but the one that is lower in price makes your "findings" questionable. Why spend 11 minutes of viewers' time if you already know that price will be more important than Swiss quality?
Its up to the viewer, the data is there, after all the tests, i give my pick, double the price for hairline improvements is just not worth it *to me*