Schulz Reacts: JK Rowling Rejected from Harry Potter Reunion Show | Andrew Schulz & Akaash Singh
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 май 2024
- Join the Patreon Asshole Army:
bit.ly/2xQwHYf
Flagrant 2 is a comedy podcast that delivers unfiltered, unapologetic, and unruly hot takes directly to your dome piece. In an era dictated by political correctness, hosts Andrew Schulz and Akaash Singh, along with AlexxMedia and Mark Gagnon, could care less about sensitivities. If it’s funny and flagrant it flies. If you are sensitive this podcast is not for you. But if you miss the days of comedians actually being funny instead of preaching to a quire then welcome to The Flagrancy.
New York native and internationally touring stand-up, Andrew Schulz is known for his hilarious and unsafe comedy. He has starred in the sitcom BENDERS (now available on Netflix), can be seen in Amazon’s SNEAKY PETE, HBO’s CRASHING, and on MTV including GUY CODE and GIRL CODE.
In the podcast realm, Schulz can be heard on the wildly popular THE BRILLIANT IDIOTS - co-hosted by nationally syndicated radio and television personality Charlamagne tha God - the hilarious sports commentary podcast FLAGRANT 2, and the film and TV analysis podcast WESTERBROS. He has made major appearances on The Joe Rogan Experience, Bert Kreischer’s BERTCAST, Joey “coco” Diaz The Chuch of What’s Happening Now, and Theo Von’s This Past Weekend. He has even done solo interviews with the likes of Lil Duval and many others.
Andrew’s online presence has touched hundreds of millions of people across the globe and his unconventionally funny approach to the comedy world has launched him into stardome. His shows Dropping In and Inside Jokes will rack of hundreds of thousands of views weekly. Nothing is off limits for Schulz, from sex to race, and even the occasional audience heckler roast, Andrew is hungry to be the best. He can be seen in New York City performing regularly at New York Comedy Club and the Comedy Cellar.
100% agree with Akash. There is no Harry Potter without JK Rowling. Its disrespectful not to have her there.
… no shit? What kind of statement is that? In other news the sky is blue. You say that like its something profound
@@johannsebastianbach3501 it's called expressing yourself. Last I checked, I can still do it, despite RUclips's best efforts. So here's me doing it again, "Fuck off, you Communist prat".
@@johannsebastianbach3501 then why are they still doing it then.. you should be directing your anger at HBO
@@johannsebastianbach3501 You're just mad the commenter is black.
@@surenjackoo expressing yourself? No its called lacking a brain, and repeating what you’ve heard others say a million times before. Its just common sense. In other news pigs say oink.
akaash is 100% right.the movies were great and the actors deserve credit but JK Rowling literally put her life into 7 books by herself. trying to cut her out is absolutely ridiculous
No her..no books.
It's really that simple.
JK Rowling - women who bleed
Totally, nobody cares about the writer(s) of Friends because there were probably loads of them! And no one really cares about the Friends Reunion anyway. But Akaash is totally correct - ONLY ONE person wrote ALL the Harry Potter books and that was J.K. Rowling. To push her to the side because of one comment she made is ridiculous and "woke-shite".. There is no HP without JK Rowling..
Welcome to leftists world.
Bothers everyone.
She probably got about a billion kids into reading books, a far greater and more positive contribution to humanity than all her trolls best efforts combined.
Hear hear.
I started reading more after reading her books at aged 11. My parents got me the first book for Christmas 1998. And it looked shit. A boy with glasses outside a train station. I picked it up and read it one night and was hooked. It's not my favourite book serirs as a child but because it was so long it kept me hooked
Actually went to the library and got the chamber of secrets. And later the prisoner of Azkaban. Was about 13 or 14 when the 4rth book came out. I was really excited about it coming out.
Even my mum liked it. And read it to my younger sister.
So yeh it brought us joy. And JK created that.
For real!
WORD!
@Johnny Tightlips That's why I said "probably", I was half right so you should probably update your Johnny Tightits fact check to 50% true, likewise, a Harry Potter book lying around in a room with half the pages missing would probably be a more entertaining contribution to any house party than you I'm guessing.
JK Rowling was once asked for a word to describe what the world needed more of. She said tolerance. Never would she have guessed that she could be hunted for intolerance crimes such as acknowledging biology…
Gender is not biology. People who study gender aren’t biologists. Anatomy and chromosomes are biological. People who dedicate their life to studying actual biological science don’t give a fuck about gender expression and clothes and makeup and gender roles.
JK Rowling was homeless, started writing the Harry Potter series on fucking napkins, and became one of the most famous women in the world based off of her works of fiction. Crazy. I probably don’t agree with all of her politics but these people slandering her are insane!!
most people agree with her . the argument she was making on twitter ( when the lgbt got mad) was that men that transition and claim they have periods are mentally ill ... and that women in sports should not worry of men killing them in sports.. ( like mma and stuff like that )_ .
@Don Che I think the irony is that JK Rowling probably leans left on the political spectrum, she seems to me pretty progressive based on the themes of her writings and opinions before she got cancelled. A loud minority of people hate her for what she has said recently, I think.
They fucking hate that she's a self-made woman that's not afraid to speak her opinion
@Don Che That's a pretty retarded take.
@@Sephiroso. is it tho
never really see those on the right constantly cancelling people for their opinions or what they did a decade ago...
She didn’t make anti trans tweets. She just pointed out biological reality. If reality is a problem for you, then you are the one with the problem, not everyone else.
@@hselena4074 Care to elaborate? I can look up the finer details, just intrigued to know what else she done.
@@hselena4074 what did she do
@Joseph Chatfield yup that's the thing...ask one of these straight guys who are sympathetic to the trans movement if they'd date a trans woman and watch them get queasy. Lolll
@Joseph Chatfield no offense to your opinion and ur entitled to have one and share it but your making this all about you. In reality someone else being transgendered has nothing to do with you. No one's asking you to date them etc.
Im against what they're doing to Jk rowling and how they're trying to ruin Dave Chappelle too. For no good reason. Are we not allowed to have discussions anymore.
@@tamarajay7676 he may not be phrasing what he's saying in the most sensitive way but he's responding to the initial comment of JKR speaking on biology. For the record, I think JKR's main point was the previous lived experience being different, more than the biological aspect. I'm going by her initial, huge as ****** essay level statement and not her possibly reactionary tweets. I don't have a doubt that she thought trans-woman had struggles to deal with and thought they needed attention but she probably wanted a lens to be put to them separately (trans-women and cis-women). I mean, black people probably don't want their issues measured and responded to on the same scale as gay people's, regardless of whether they support it or not, as the response can become conflated/confused, slowing both of their progress at the same time. On top of that, a lot of bad people that just look for people to crucify have thrown themselves into these movements when they aren't even what they support, and obviously just get off on cancelling and ruining people for the rush of it.
I guess the later portion of this comment is more addressing people in general than you specifically. Sorry, I have a problem with ranting for no reason.
Anti-transgender comments? No… she said “sex is real” and you cannot deny it is real. Sexism and same-sex marriage are based on sex. She was disagreeing with the narrative that biological sex is meaningless
Precisely biology is all it is. It’s just shame biology has become political and people get affected by stupid political correctness.
People need to stop living in a deluded world and stop being snowflakes.
This woke culture is a actually killing logical reasoning, damn you gotta admit bruh
The issue is that there is no actual narrative that biological sex is meaningless for her to be fighting against
JK Rowling not there is ludicrous. These people are nuts
JK Rowling made these actors multimillionaires and they threw her under the bus. Smh
Hello England, hear in AMERIKA as you already know our Wankers are bigger than your Wankers. Idenity politics make them think they are better than anyone who disagrees with them. We are now ruled by the Biden, Harris Communist party.
Lets keep the same energy for all the marvel actors who didn’t stand up for stan Lee when he was kept on house arrest by his family and lawers till he Died !
@@kissmysix considering you can't write a coherent sentence. I suggest you refrain from sharing your political beliefs from now on.
@@jacobm804 I understood what he was saying lol. Stop shitting on dude cuz you disagree
She's a racist terf
Someone Tweeted this and it is ABSOLUTELY TRUE: “JK Rowling worked tirelessly creating the world of Harry Potter, and they’re refusing to include her in the 20 year reunion because she thinks women are women and men are men. Wow."
Lol so true
She doesn't even have anything against transgender women. She doesn't think the distinction should be completely erased, as the lived experience and struggle of a woman is different than one of a trans-woman. I never understood the controversy in that. I already know someone will probably respond to call me out but Rowling had spent a decade pandering to leftist beliefs, including trans matters, and just because she had one disagreement on the nature of one belief, not even from a place of hate, she was cast out as a devil among her peers.
I don't even like Harry Potter, and don't consider myself right-leaning.
Imagine ever trying to predict that one
That's actually not exactly what she believes it's more women are women and trans women are trans women.
They involved jk Rowling and tried to discredit all her works because she speaks the truth. It's war on the liars .👿
Its not about the fact that she is responsible for his success. The fact is that JK Rowling is right. And we all need to support what is right...not what is convenient at the time.
amen
What specifically is she right about?
Did anyone else actually look at the tweet JK Rowling posted that got her in so much heat from the media? It's mind blowing, there's literally nothing controversial with what was said.
Can u link me it? Im lazy
@@eirik.9384 pretty sure it was “trans women aren’t women”
@@margaretelford8309 No it wasn't lol
@@eirik.9384 Stephen King replied to a fan, writing: “Yes. Trans women are women.”
After his response to a fan affirming that trans women are women, Rowling subsequently deleted her tweet which praised The Shining author.
@@eirik.9384 Most recently, the author linked her Twitter followers to a shop selling anti-transgender items, such as badges that say “F**k your pronouns” and “Notorious Transphobe”.
"and she won't mind me calling her a b**** 'cause I'm emphasizing her womanhood and that's very important to her!" 😂😂😂
The speed and delivery of that bar killed me... Akaash spits fire on this one!
Akaash was on 🔥 in this 😂
She also isn't wrong about trans woman. If they were women then you'd just call them women. But you call them Trans women. It doesn't mean they don't deserve equal rights and safety that everyone deserves.
I’m calling Dylan Dylan Dylan
Akash is not having it at all and he’s 100% right.
He's like 40 percent right
@@escandersanchez65 100%
@@escandersanchez65 she literally had the final say on the actors to play her characters and insisted every actor had to be British/Irish so akash is spot on
@@Nevano12 is that what Christopher Columbus said or where you getting that? Even if that's so ...he's still around 40 percent correct
And pointing out that he said some correct stuff doesn't delete the incorrect things he said
You understand that right?
Dude she is literally a TERF. You have any idea what those people are? They harass transwomen online and offline, push for legislation that denies them access to healthcare, stalk them and doxx them. Please understand what you are talking about before you speak.
I'm with Rowling all the way on this one.
"Whoever can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." -Voltaire
Trans women are real women...is definitely one of the most common absurdities being believed today.
I'm with Akaash , without her there would be no wizarding fantasy masterpiece world , they should give her some props
She created those characters , She’s the only one who can really provide any amplifying information on the history of that world and the characters. The actors can only give their experiences on set.
Right here is the correct answer people
So never heard of hp Lovecraft huh...marvel comics? Or the bible? I like your point it's cute and all but it's incorrect
@@escandersanchez65 so people making up new stories and things takes away from the creator? Nope
@@escandersanchez65 so other people write for marvel comics now so Stan lee doesn’t mean shit? Your wrong
@@pineapplepileus8719 way to ignore what someone said and infer your own message
Her initials premise..only the original creator can make an origin or flesh out the characters background
My counter point: franchises in the united states that are bigger then the author
Sirs rebuttals: I like turtles
Okay guy get some reading comprehension then we can talk
There isn't a Harry Potter without JK. She is the reason they are stars.
Yes but she did this to herself
@@abcdefgh6951 how? By having a brain ?
You’ve had too much to think JK…
I know I feel the same exact way about the Harvey Weinstein situation
@@xyznzt48 that says a lot about you
If they really that upset with Rowling why don't they burn the money she put in their pockets and distance themselves from the characters and story she created? Because they're not really THAT upset. They just don't want the mob coming for them. They wanna further their careers and they're scared of getting canceled
How f*cking dare they? The nerve of these people. They owe their entire careers to that woman's creative strength. They rode to the skies on her creativity, and now they attempt to cut her out. How dare they?
JK Rowling’s tweets weren’t even anti trans. It’s crazy how people just call her that bc some idiots describe her that way.
Too many morons believing immediately without taking the proper context. And believe idiots who say dumb sh*t and just run with it.
Also they come up with these dumbass terminologies like "TERF" like it's something named by the military. Which has somehow more effort put into it than the random Xi/Xe/Xer etc pronouns they come up with. Suddenly these people believe in radical feminism. But when something's anti-men, it doesn't exist.
You read every single one? Dedication
Andrews reaction to hearing Daniel's net worth is SO real.
Actors and entertainers are insanely overpaid
@@albertojhernandez
And sports people too
@@albertojhernandez no they get paid market rate. Like anything else. We just value them highly
@@kaderathebeekeeper22m3 can you do what athletes and actors do? No, you can’t so they deserve their pay and more
@@kaderathebeekeeper22m3
As they should
I don't get how people are against JK Rowling for wanting female safe spaces. She didn't say anything hateful or violence inciting. She just expressed her discomfort with trans people being in places reserved for females. Why are people trying shame her into feeling different
And let's not forget how charitable Jk Rowling is. She kept donating her money to the point where she wasn't a billionaire. And we know that she would be a billionaire many times over with the Harry Potter franchise
I fully agree with Akaash. I'm mad. We can have opinions and disagree. Why do we need to cancel people? I refuse to watch it. For me, she is a role model. It doesn't mean I need to agree with her on everything. That woman taught me to have compassion for different people. It would be too cynical not to apply it to her. I don't think what she said is that serious. Blaire White is not offended by her and I am not transgender to have an opinion on the subject. I refuse to cancel her.
Blaire is awesome and on the Right though.
@@jerrywhidby. I know in America that means that her opinion is invalid. In the rest of the world we don’t care. We value people and opinions regardless of its political affiliation. I think that she is coherent and sane. I like her and her opinion in general is balanced. To me at least.
@@MTech07 I agree. I was remarking on her political affiliation because you don't see that level of thought and introspection from people on the Left as often. They have more of a mob, cult like mentality. Not that the Right doesn't act like that at times. It's just rare.
She didn't even offend. She just said trans women are not women. They are taking up women's space and snatching all athletic medals.
@@emergence8217 I have to say that I am not going to white knight for anyone on this issue. A lot of the problems with this issue derived from woke women. I think it would be great to see women work this out for themselves. They can only make believe for so long. As record after record is broken by trans people they will be faced with a harsh reality. I think that this is an amazing red pill moment for women. Guys should just sit down, shut the F up, and grab some popcorn.
A GOT reunion without George RR Martin would not even happen. Everybody els would beirrelevant without him...
Yeah that GOT reference proved akash’s point lol
The fans will tune in because they want to see what possibly could be next for the series they love. None of the actors can give them that hope or information, the creator is the only one who can shed any light on what comes next in the show or movie saga they love.
Yeah it would, because he wouldn’t show up.
they finished/ruined the final season without him lol
Totally different. GRRM, hasn’t finished anything; therefore he can’t reunite. AND The GOT cast, will never reunite to celebrate that abortion.
Love Akash for that rant! Celebrating an artist's work without including the artist that everyone involved made a mint off, is EVERYTHING that's wrong with this 'woke revolution'.
You would think that if the actors had an issue with JK they could call and talk to her, she was with them on set in the first movies and talked to them regularly. BUT no, they make comments on twitter towards her. You right F them, it ain't just about the damn books, she created the cash cow that made them who they are. She doesn't care, she has a production company, has multiple multi-million dollar deals and she has been making TV shows in the UK and she has other successful books. She not sweatin' it.
Bruh I love how confident and brazen Akaash was in this clip. So fuckin dope, need this energy from him every pod!
Lmao fr he wasn't backing down from the start. Fuck them actors!
Without her, so many of those people wouldn't have careers. Harry Potter was MASSIVE without the movies.
So massive that many people who read the books were mad that the movies didn't follow the book to the T.
People forget how big the books were before the movies were even a distant thought. every other series they try to compare it to doesn't even come close. It's why Rowling was able to leverage herself so much control and input into how the films were made.
Even with the movies, no director would have cast those actors. They weren’t actors. Rowling cast them because she refused any non British children being in the movie and getting a chance at success. They owe her everything, that’s like not inviting your own mom to your birthday. She was the one who fckin gave birth to you, and you don’t invite her because she experienced trauma that sensibly made her sensitive about violence against women (biological women is what I mean when I say women, if I mean trans women I’ll say trans women and it’s not derogatory, it’s descriptive and accurate).
@@msi8311 Exaclt, and by extension she did a lot for Britain actually! It pisses me off that the actors opened their mouths and clearly pandered to the left. Pathetic.
They also been trying to take the franchise (her cut) away from her since 2017, but she has an ironclad agreement and trademarks.
Follow the money. I don't think the people driving this care crap all about Rowling's views on trans, this is just step 1 in an attempt to separate her from the IP she created. They wanna cut her out of the money loop on a franchise that's gonna pump out cash for generations.
@@Mike-ul1xn I'd say it's a mix of both
Damn, Akaash has never been THIS right about anything, dude was throwin down the gauntlet, and I'm not even mad about it.
ANDREW'S RIGHT ABOUT DANIEL RADCLIFFE. NOT SINCE JOHN WALL HAS A MAN FALLEN OFF SO MUCH AFTER BEING A WIZARD .
You didn’t have to do that man like that
Vicious 💀💀
dead
That was uncalled for.
Gahh damn man chill 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
JK Rowling was such a good writer that she wrote an adult fictional book under a pseudonym and it still became a best-seller. Amazing talent. Akaash is 100% correct.
What book?
To be fair, it was pretty widely know that it was her
@@Mike-ul1xn not until after it was best seller
@@y.o.s6000 under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith
@@MaestroIrish her publisher knew so it got the full court press promotion. It was the main display in all the airport bookstores the week it was released. Not to say her writing talent doesn't stand on its own, but a random no-name author doesn't get that kind of treatment.
Akash is spot on about this. There is no franchise without Rowling. She should do her own 20th Anniversary show on a competing cable network just to mess with them. Then we’ll see what’s up. It will have a similar Rotten Tomato’s score of Chapelle where the critics hate it but the audience loves it. All because both of them aren’t willing to gaslight you.
JK Rowling should get Knighted for her contributions of being an English literary icon.
Akaash went off in this one 😭😭
he ain't wrong
I love it!
The moments when Akaash locks in with full passion are absolute gold. Dude was spitting nothing but facts.
These Harry Potter fans got blue pilled into believing *J.K. Rowling* is the real *VOLDEMORT* 😂🤣
Andy kaufman is voldermort
The activists think they are Dumbledore’s army but they are the Deatheaters. The series is about defeating an authoritarian regime. Those actors are clueless. I will not be watching their pathetic reunion.
Yooo akaash is 1000% correct and idk if mark is playing that act or if he really is that shallow lol
Let’s stop idolizing these actors who are literally ACTING wtf
Can we also not just group what she said lazily into the "anti- trans" group. If people took the time to actually read what she said, you'd understand her sentiment without just throwing her into the bigot box. It's very easy to throw someone into the prejudice group - that way they don't need to be contended with coz the public already believe that this person a bigot. Its classic snowflake propaganda, and I'm having none of it.
See, I’ve read what she said, and I disagree. Can you tell me which quote of hers you think is the most controversial?
Im with Akaash....all day.
Facts
The whole if you don't agree with our politics and opinions your out is ridiculous. These people are "professionals" they should be able to put politics and opinions on the back burner. No writer means no book or movie It's a massive kick in the face to J.k who literally made these people.
I absolutely agree. I would absolutely need J. J. R Martin to be there for a game of of thrones reunion and JK Rowling for Harry Potter. They would have way more to talk about and it would be interesting to see what they think about how their vision was interpreted
I remember reading the first novel in the summer when I was a kid in grade 7 or so, back when the the books first came out, those books were truly magical and took me to a wonderful place in my imagination, I will always be thankful for Jk Rowling creating such a great world to lose myself in as a kid, I agree with Akash completely, this is stupid
True.. Very True
Akaash isn't just spitting out truths, he's dropping truth nukes from space
Doxxing should be illegal. Those activists need to face repercussions.
People that do this shit aren't activists they're subhuman pieces of trash
Doxxing IS illegal, they just don't care if it's coming from "the left"
It is llegal
Not having JK Rowling there is like not having Larry David and/or Jerry Seinfeld at a Reunion for Seinfeld, or not having Christopher Nolan present for a reunion of one of his movies! As fantastic as the actors may have been in they’re roles, they’re not gonna be able to go over the creation of the characters, storyline, set location process, etc.
😆 Andrew's reactions after finding out Daniel is worth over 100 mil. That's real tho, anyone who changes my life like that I'm 100% loyal to them. Who cares what her views are.
I respect Rupert Grint for taking his money and disappearing. Dude bought an ice cream truck for fun to give away ice cream to kids in his neighbourhood. He's living with millions and you don't hear shit about him. I respect that.
He was on sick note on netflix
@@SJ-tb2wq i loved that show
She has accomplish more good by getting a whole generation of kids to be excited about READING, than whatever these activist/SJW will every do in their combine lifetimes.
Akaash’s flagrant energy in this clip is gonna have me fired up all day
Not to mention how incredibly charitable she is as a woman..
JK Rowling is a middle aged Christian woman & Dave Chappelle is a middle aged Muslim man
Both of them are more progressive than any middle aged religious person I’ve ever met in my entire life
Damn right! JK Rowling IS Harry Potter. Se is the one who everybody associates the most with it and who created it all. The rest are of no importance. When they are having their reunion she can sit alone in a room and this will be the reunion that actually matters lol
Akash was full of genuine passion … JK Rowling deserves respect for getting a generation into reading.. reading will open your mind and improves your prospects
JK Rowling was so involved in everything that when Stephen Fry couldn't pronounce a certain phrase for the audiobook he asked if he could say it differently. She said no because she wanted kids to be able to hear the words they were reading to help them learn. I stand with her. It's her product and she deserves to be there more than any of them.
Akaash is the man. Stands up for what he believes in. That matters because there is a tiny but incredibly vocal group in social media who like nothing better than to attack...most of them don't even believe in their own bs but it pays their bills.
Remember the journalist that went after Bill Burr and his wife, and kept making snide tweets in a way that you could tell he was just trying to gain recognition? He was provoking people over nothing the whole time, and had a history of it.
1:42 "this a group project? Harry Potter books was one bitch dawg" Akaash bro 😂
“We must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy”
I grew up reading these books. They were my childhood and my escape from a dysfunctional abusive household. JK Rowling kept me sane and alive and I will love her forever for that. No one (that she made famous) will have her back for speaking the truth about the erasure of woman’s rights because they don’t want to be seen as transphobic and they don’t want to be cancelled. None of them deserve to be there. I will not be watching that nonsense “reunion”.
I’m a woman. No rights of mine have been erased by trans people. Have any of yours?
"They should give herr Harrenhall" had me dying!!!!!
she might have opinions that some people don't like, but she's generally a very thoughtful and classy person so it wouldn't surprise me if she pulled out on her own from the reunion because she knew it would bring drama.
True
I really like her thoughtful classy intelligent and brave.
She is responsible, drama is not what she is about. It's not what any serious person would do, create drama for drama's sake.
There are deeper issues at stake here, ones that actually matter
@@elektrotehnik94 and what would that be?
@@masterlucky379 Trans people competing with the women, THAT'S a huge issue in the space 😂 it's like the most serious issue plaguing mankind
Yeah, not having the person who created the world and wrote the words everyone fell in love with is crazy.
So if they did a LOTR reunion, you wouldn't wanna see Ian Mckellen (Gandolf) Orlando Bloom (Legolas) Viggo Mortensen (Aragon) or Elija Wood (Frodo), you'd wanna see J.R.R. Tolkien?
@@kc_lucky3081 its not about who the fans wanna see reunions is basically about showing respect and love to your family.
@@kc_lucky3081 That's different because Tolkien is not alive anymore. If he was, yes, I would love to hear him speak alongside those other people. He would more than deserve to sit there next to them.
It's not a matter of either only the creator or only the actors. You can have both, mate. Just grab another chair and have 2 people share a mic.
@@robbetorfs4093 Yeah you can have both, but that's not what was being said in the video we're commenting on!
@@kc_lucky3081 How is it not? They said that there should't be a reunion without JK Rowling because that would be disrespectful. That's still different from saying "the reunion can only have JK Rowling in it".
Ad breaks on clips? Wild
Lmao akash was having mad fun in this clip he had me rollin man
The movies are scene to scene copies of the books, everything in the movies is described exactly as the books, you cannot fucking say that J. K rowling should not be a part of the movie anniversary.
Yea I'm pretty sure she was on set for most of the movies as a creative consultant (making sure they didn't fuck up the books lol). The movies are nothing without her.
@@mistrsynistr7644 and if she wasn’t there, the movies more than likely would’ve been criticized for digressing from the book. That’s generally something that hampers movie adaptation success from their source material
@@Capothekid absolutely, she is probably the main reason the movies were successful as well as the actors/actresses in them.
I absolutely refuse to watch this reunion, even as a massive fan. This is not a Nazi sympathizer, this is a difference of opinion on a single political issue that is hotly debated. It’s insane these actors no one would have ever heard of could go along with trashing her.
Ps I love Andrew only got mad after finding how much money she made them
If you look into it, almost EVERY case of canceling or excluding someone has nothing to do with sympathizing with Nazis.
Disingenuous people have to pretend that's the case because the average person won't support it unless a monumental exaggeration is made
Congrats to you guys.. well deserved.. keep keeping it 💯💯💯
I’ve never seen an ad in the middle of a highlight before what the fuck
Well all she needs to do is write another sequal book and not sell its screening rights.
I would not be surprised if WB has the rights to the franchise
There already is another book.
@@h-dawg969 Not after cursed child there isn't
@@NA86737 She has the rights to the franchise, hence her being a billionaire. Movie companies actually changed the franchising rights so they instead could more money than the creators themselves.
Sell it to their competitors even if they offer a better deal. Or tell them there's a 100% price mark up because "Fuck you."
Jk Rowling should go on flagrant 2 that would be wild
Love Andrew flipping as soon as he heard the moolah Radcliffe made 🤣🤣
Akaash just turned into Sean Lock in this clip 😂😂
We've reached the point where something that's undeniably true and easily provable through science is now some sort of hate crime.
1984,fuck all commies
What is undeniably true and easily provable through science and supposedly some sort of hate crime?
I guess actual women take second place after imaginary ones
🔥
Yes they literally do.
sad sick world we live in.
Imagine how strong the patriarchy has become when men that transition to women become more important/valued than women 🤣🤣🤣 "progressives" have legitimately created a paradox
Ayt bet. I think this is the episode to make me join the patreon
Alan Rickman, Ralph Fiennes and Gary Oldman just to name a few are top rated actors who definitely brought in more audience with their quality performance.
Homie bit the hand that fed him and spit the finger back out lol
Those books were the only books that made me cry, those books that encompass so much wisdom, she created that amazing world
They kind of prove her point when they say it like ‘if they feel or identify as a women they are a women’ you can feel and identify all you want, doesn’t change science.
Akash is getting more and more confident and its really awesome to watch
-You have to agree with everything she says ?
- Andrew without hesitation, yes. 😂
no hezi lmaooo
Now this is gross. Even as someone who disagrees with her views YOU CANNOT KICK THE CREATOR FROM THE FKING MOVIES REUNION. Harry Potter exist because of a struggling single mother's hardwork and imagination. And to see it taken away from her just because of her views ( AND seriously its not like she is a fking Nazi or anything) just shows how ungrateful the late stage capitalistic world is.
U disagree with her views that biological women exist?
@@ownthelibs you came to argue lol. That’s the one thing you took out of this 😂
@@Bigpoppapump24 because that’s the thing that’s most ridiculous out of all of this, for one she’s was speaking facts and if you disagree you’re the problem too, also it’s the reason she’s not gonna be there so why agree with the people that are taking her out ????
@@tbone2123 well no disagreeing with her take doesnt make you the same as the people banning her from the reunion
Theres plenty of people i disagree with on political topics, incl some of my best friends. And its just disagreements, i know they are good people and they know the same about me
Saying he disagrees with her opinion isnt the same as saying he wants her cancelled for having that opinion
@@ownthelibs .... and this is why nuance is dead in America. Something both sides can agree yet there is always one guy trying to virtue signal to his tribe, smh.
JK Rowling is Harry Potter, she created the Harry Potter world. She is also one of the best fiction writers of this century. My respect for her went up by the fact that she speaks the truth and won’t apologize for it.
She should have received her flowers at the reunion, and been given a chance to say her peace.. again.
The fact that she got rejected multiple times by publishers and came close to giving up before the world even came to know about Harry Potter…. None of them would be in their position today if it wasn’t for her.
Honestly, talk about profiting off of someone and throwing them to the dogs.
Thank you for having her back guys, because if the books weren't so great and successful the films wouldn't have been made, we should all remember that, plus everyone is entitled to there own opinion.
akaash is 💯 right!..also.JK is brilliant with the tweets.
Totally down with Aakash! Spitting fire broda! Can’t imagine Harry Potter without JK Rowling, and love George RR Martin and GOT, but correct me if I am wrong, I think the show made the books way more popular. But in case of HP, the books held legendary status before even the actors were cast !
Andrew: "I'll kill myself if Daniel Radcliffe is worth $100 million"...
2 mins later: "So let me tell you about Talkspace for anything depression or anxiety related...."
It shouldn't matter because it's still her shit but these actors wouldn't be anything without her. They're not that good.
Honestly besides Harry Potter, what other good movies has those main 3 actors been in?
@@rickDArula Emma Watson definitely been in good movies the others not so much
@@CamPerry She only gets roles because she was in Harry Potter. Even in her other roles, she doesn't do well. Bad actress.
@@CamPerry Such as>?
If they did a 20 year reunion of my story I put my life into, you bet your ass I’m coming with or without the invite
Lmao hell yeah. Yall thought shit was sweet.
Akaash 1000% right. JK is the most important and interesting part of this whole shit. Danielle is 2nd.
is talkspace free?
Akash had the fire. Damn straight.
Akaash went full "you the reason black men date white women" on this one. And I fully agree with his take 100%.
7:41 "I'm sitting here with my legs crossed callin you a B**ch" LOL! 🤣😂🤣🤣
100% agree. Specially for sci fi i want hear the creator the most. His thoughts on how he came up with some ideas. How did he perceive one's acting performance and if the show or movie made him justice. For sitcoms or shows like Friends acting out normal life I just want to see the actors mostly
A Beatles reunion with everyone but the guy that's still alive.
Wow Akash finally won a argument lol
LOL! There's still 2 alive
Everybody forgets Apu
She has been featured in the special content section of many if not every movie released. So the “it’s the movie anniversary” thing rings hollow to me.
They are her characters. She created them. The films exist BECAUSE of her. She doesn’t subscribe to their religion, they ought to agree to disagree.
Good take on this comment, pretty much sums it up.
Right. Without her there should be no reunion. They're pretty much hijacking her work because she won't conform to the beliefs of a cult.
he said that bc he probably only watched the movies
"Thats a landing sticking bitch!" I'm dying
Thank you!!!!!! Yes!!! So true. Everybody is mad because she was speaking facts and they all want to push that woke shit.