Fastest Case Ever 🤯
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- #judge #courtroom #court #judgejudy
WARNING ⚠️:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This content doesn’t belong to Jou Motivation, it is edited and shared only for the purpose of awareness, and if the content OWNERS (visual/audio) of this content has any issue, I request you to directly message to this page, thus we sort out the outcome.
"I trained my dog to not destroy other people house" was a valid point
She is a dog sitter she is supposed to watch the dog and take care of it 🙄
@@masroorabbas8842 what if she was in toilet or the dog became agressive bruv? There are limits to a job
Giving an agressive dog to a dog keeper, who do you think should be out at fault?
@LaRoue_DeLaChance your acting like the dog pays the bills and her entire job is just to take care of him can't be that difficult plus you should always leash the dog if u gotta do ur business
@@masroorabbas8842 bruv, Ill explain you in a simple way that you will understand
If a kid breaks shit in school, who will pay for what he broke?
The teacher?
@@LaRoue_DeLaChance we dont know if the dog was aggressive but either way if you become a dog sitter or pet sitter you should be aware of how pets might act. As a dog sitter she takes on responsability for the dog and any damages.
If someone helps you out by pet sitting your dog, you should pay for any damages your dog did. Honestly.
dogs destroys thing when they are left alone, if the owner wanted to left her dog alone, she whouldnt had pay for pet sitting
The dog having damaged her home enough for her to sue meant she wasn't watching after the dog at all, entirely her fault, which is why it was dismissed
@ not necessarily. People work. If you leave my dog alone during the day and not in her cage, she destroys things from being too anxious. When I have someone keep her for a weekend, I bring her cage and warn that she needs to be in there if they leave. But if she got out, I would pay for damages. I know how she is.
No not really, she agreed to do it and clearly did something wrong
No, that means you failed at the "pet sitting" part.
If she was pet sitting, she should be watching the dog...
True
Btw 1st reply
Unless she let the dog outside and it munched on a power line
Then it would be dead💀
@@Ðř.ÐĘÄŤĦ oh yeah
Exactly
Never let that judge cook again💀🙏
if she was petsitting then she would've been looking at the dog
casually calls her that judge loll *no hate just saying thats crazy that u dont know thats judge judy*
Idiot
@@BriannaHailieBarcelonat all times? Either way she can’t control what the dog does
@nickirango blud she's not popular around the world 🤦♂️
Not gonna lie I think this makes judge Judy look like a clown. She has no clue what she is yapping abt
She is a clown
And this comes from a person who actually unironically likes basketball
@@LyssFrwhat does that have to do with anything..
@@LyssFr your common sense is somehow lower than your height.
women judge with emotions
When you have adopted a dog , it's your responsibility .. you cant leave your dog to someone else's house without mentioning that it was not trained. Wtf ..
Okay, but why is the responsibility to the dog owner? Shouldn't the dog SITTER ask basic questions?? Like "Does your dog have destructive behavior?" She didn't argue that the owner lied to her. Isntead, she said the owner didn't tell her. You can't expect the consumer to know what the service provider needs to do THEIR job. I mean, It's their job, for God's sake. All kinds of misunderstandings may happen. That's why the service provider shoud ask everything before doing their job. It doesn't matter if it's common sense or not. Not all common sense is obvious to everyone.
If a dog is destructive, you should have informed the dog sitter?? It's a danger to the dog sitter too@@Precigian
@atuasaysnopedude dogs don't randomly start destroying furniture they do that when you leave them alone for extended period of time so it is the dog sitter fault
@@DusanDoncic .. normal dogs don't randomly start destroying furniture.
Yeah, they don’t randomly destroy stuff if they are trained.. also I don’t get the debate cause nothing was detailed about the damage (in the short) Also shouldn’t the dog sitter ask if the dog is destructive or not?
What the...?
This is stupid. Of course the owner is responsible for the damage.
I acc hate that judge sm she’s so rude and disrespectful to everyone isw
shes only like that to people who deserve it, she sued that lady for a stupid reason
If you are offended then that means it is a you problem, not her
@ what tf does that even mean bro
Waaaaahhhhh..... little Karen
karen plss....keep that dumb head of yours to ur self
-U-uhm i disagree with your
-GOODBYE
Ty for 13 likess
I dislike this judge so bad. She doesn't deserve to be a judge. So disrespectful and feels high above others
Thats judge judy most puplar shes not a real judge shes a fake shes on real on film
Cry about it
@@AzozAlharbi-ye1fu it's true that it's a tv show. But she's a real judge and the sentence are real. Just search for information before write whatever online
@ shes only in movies and tv shows bro she isnt real i did my reaserch
@@AzozAlharbi-ye1fu m8, she is a retired JUDGE for family court trials. The case on tv are real and both parties agreed to be mediated by her also because the tv shows pay both of them some money so the losing part also win something. But again those are not hidden informations, it's really easy to find it with more than 10 second search. She was a formal judge and she IS a retire judge and her judgment are legally bind thanks to the alternative dispute agreement both parties had.
A very honest and highly disciplined Judge ❤❤❤❤ Goodbye 👋 forever.Big Thief, OLE!
I'm having a court to attend today, and I really wish it'll be this fast and winning. If somehow we lose , my parent and I will live under the bridge. Wish me luck 🍀
It's called home insurance, that's what it's for. Same as when someone slips on your sidewalk, you're liable for damages and injuries done on your property. Doesn't matter if its "fair".
Unless the pet owner never said their dog has an destructive behaviors, then yes the pet owner is liable for damage their pet did to the sitters home
What kind of bs is this? If someone trips and falls on your sidewalk you would never be liable unless it’s actually your fault. Stop just making stuff up to sound smart
Its true. Its bullshit but its true@Invisible_Fury
@Invisible_Fury it's actually partially true. It's not just any of slip or fall but if it snows and there is ice and someone slips it's on the homeowner because it was their responsibility to clean up the sidewalk of ice but they didn't
judge didn’t take her meds 🙏 never cook again
Naha judge judy a G
She is a dog sitter, she needs to supervise the dog so this wouldn’t happen
@@amoleculetosociety that may be the case but this case was definitely still unfair. The judge closed down any opportunity for anyone to explain points of consideration. both parties have the opportunity to present their side of the story, with the judge or jury listening to evidence and arguments before making a decision, this judge evidently did not do this. Awful judge. There is a lot more things bad about this judge which would make this comment awfully long.
Nah this was cemetery fair
@funkymonkeysquads how was it unfair? It was a stupid case, the dog sitter failed to watch the dog, and the dog owner really should have told the sitter if there were anything she needed to be aware of behaviourably but didn't, but since the sitter has her own dog, she knows they can get into mischieve if you're not doing your job, if she was in the toilet during the time, that's kinda understandable but she wasn't, she wasn't doing her job s a dog sitter... dogs like children need to be watched to make sure they don't get into anything they shouldn't etc... she was irresponsible, still doesn't take away the owner should have said something but still her responsibility, it happened in her own home, she should have been watching...
Is this judge high or what ??
If the dog is untrained and makes a mess at someone else's home then the owner of the dog is supposed to cover for damage.
Not if you’re a dog sitter. You keep your eye on the dog and train the dog even. If she let the dog loose in her house then she took the risk.
@mpp3723 If it is her job then the legality maybe what you suggest but I am not sure if dog sitters take your dogs to their own homes ?
If it was just like a favor thing done by her then the owner is definitely liable .
I agree these judges are actual on drugs
Everyone in this comment section is obviously an idiot. When you take the job to dogsit someone you are not expected to get a trained dog, you already know damage could be caused that’s why you’re looking over the dog in the first place. Plus who’s to say that she didn’t just break things in her house and say the dog did it? Every single person in this comment section has the combined iq of an onion. 100% the fault of the person who chose to look after the dog knowing the possible consequences. Stop scrolling RUclips shorts and speaking stupid opinions if you have no idea what any of you are speaking about.
In what the actual f*** lol the Judge is in going and saying
This Judge is a Joke
I swear
She isnt the woman that the red head was complaining abt didnt have a dog@princepain7997
This judge is also not a judge.
Yeah the stupidest "judge" lady I've ever seen in RUclips
She’s not an actual judge you know that right? Every court that recorded isn’t an actual court cuz it’s not allowed to be recorded
Her: Um i Disargee with your opinion 🤓
Judge: GOODBYE!! 👿👋👋👋
𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁: 𝗠𝗢𝗠 𝗜𝗠 𝗙𝗔𝗠𝗢𝗨𝗦
Jump
@@Light.beam-123 death threats? Over what?
@@Light.beam-123 Jump To Where Disneyland?! Like Bro Sthu Dont Send Me Death Threats Over a Joke!!! 💀💀💀
Judge Judy*
Now I see why dead internet theory exists
I think where the judge is coming from is that you offered to look after her dog which makes you part responsible for the damage.
Idk why she expected this lady to pay her for failing to properly watch the dog 😭😭
This case was so unfair, why should she have to pay for an untrained dog that destroyed her house?
Edit: I didn’t realize the context of this situation. If this is a dog sitter that was home while the dog was destroying the house than forget what I said
Ikr
She was meant to be watching the dog. Her fault that she can’t watch a dog
@GrayTow that is actually a good point, I didn’t realize the context of the situation
If you didn’t have the combined iq of an onion alongside every other person in the comment section you would realize that beforehand you know the consequences of taking care of a dog. It’s the same thing with babysitting. If stuff in your house is destroyed that is 100% on you and you know that before signing up for it. If it would be ruled like how you said then why not just break everything in your house and say the dog did it? Does anyone use their brains before leaving a comment??
I had 2 doggos my aunty had a young dog who she apparently had to get rid off we agreed to take her for a bit we then found our 2 dogs had fleas we had no idea that dog had fleas she never told us, so we had fun trying to get rid of the fleas, but eventually became flea free again that dog also caused a lot of damage and chaos out the back... our 2 we good but that dog was a pain, we eventually found her a new home where she'd be happy...
This was definitely a stupid ruling by judge Judy
Every ruling she does is stupid
The plaintiff was a dog sitter, she went ahead and got the dog at her own place and didn't watch the dog. Now she's suing the defendant for the damages on her home when she didn't watch the dog 🤣🤣
Another person who got the combined iq of an onion. Don’t even got time to explain it anymore try to use your brain before leaving a comment
The only people that think her decisions are stupid. are those that stupidly side with the wrong doers ...birds of a feather stick together.
@Delarosa7701 it was one decision and it definitely was stupid. People who think judges or people in authority can't ever be wrong are the true idiots here so congrats on that 🤣. Grow up kid
❗️READ THIS ❗️
THE GIRL TALKING IS A DOG SITTER, WHO WAS DOG SITTING THE DOG OF THE OTHER GIRL AT HER HOME. THE OTHER GIRLS DOG CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE TALKING GIRLS HOME, SO SHE WANTS MONEY, BUT SHE IS THE ONE IN WRONG BECAUSE IF SHE IS PET SITTING SHE SHOULD BE WATCHING THE DOG SO THE JUDGE IS RIGHT.
OMG, My ears hurt man
But she doesn't need to show impoliteness and scream tho😭😭
You're an idiot.
Alright for all use those hating. Judge, Judy, here's the thing, this woman is a dog sitter. This means that they have the dogs over usually at their house or another place where they're to keep an eye on the dogs and make sure they're not getting into mischief. Dog sitters also count as dog trainers. With the old ashy train a dog, they get paid for it too many of The Times though they're usually adults you put in a playpen or outside, we can run around and do everything it wants to do and not be a menace. This woman had dugged over at her house. The dog got into something tore it up. I mean, they don't even say what it was, so it could have been someone's shoes, because this is something that's common. It could have been a Teddy bear or pillow. It happens. I've been raised around dogs all my life. I had this one dog that tore up a pedal. We couldn't forget why it wasn't until my mom. Would ever pick it up and smelled it and says it smells like meat. It's not a chicken. The dog That was food didn't try to eat it. But yeah, I mean, this is just something that's common and for everyone in the saying that she's really mean she said it gets things done.She's a judge that finds all the facts and uses common sense
Dog sitters r not dog trainers
I can be a dog sitter without being a dog trainer. This judge is stupid the pet owner is responsible for damage
Keep smoking that good stuff there buddy. Judge Judy was wrong and I hope it was appealed
Keep smoking that good stuff there buddy. Judge Judy was wrong and I hope it was appealed
Just in general though this judge is not polite whatsoever 😭 I have seen so many cases by her and she keeps just being so disrespectful
But do you realize that the woman that was pet sitting has a dog and should understand that no matter what it’s her responsibility
She’s not being disrespectful she is being *firm*. Without firmness, people won’t listen and won’t realize their mistakes.
Judges are meant to be the sweetest people on earth! ESPECIALLY if there is stupid cases like this where the “dog sitter” allegedly was watching the dog who destroyed her home.
Some people actually do this as a way to scam people. They purposely let the dogs out of leash so that it can cause dmg then this would happen. For them it's Easy Money💰 and especially as a pet sitter they must expect pets to act that way so they need to be precautious. Some might say that Judge Judy is wrong, but for me her decision here is right.
There's a lot of ways to petsitt and it's her choice to take the dog to her house. She might not be a scammer but there's a thing called ✨"COMMON SENSE"✨.
This judge 😂 from the international court?? Not closing the case, and laughing??
Judge Judy ❤
Although a real case ; it's a TV show where they are payed by the show. Judge acts like that for more views.
If your dog is not trained, and if it damages someone else’s furniture or something like that, and you don’t tell the dog sitter that they’re are not trained is stupid and if you’re the dog sitter, you should be watching the dog but even if you’re watching the dog and you’re trying to prevent it from scratching and damaging stuff if it’s not trained, it’s just gonna keep on doing it over and over again so the lady should have paid the fine
That is such a terrible feeling when you hear it from a teacher, much less a JUDGE! 😂
I agree that, as a dog sitter who willingly took the dog in for payment, the dog sitter has responsibility over what the dog does and therefore should not require the defendant/dog owner to pay for damages caused. However, suppose there are rules for dog sitting (which I am not familiar with) such as that the client (dog owner) should have let the dog sitter know about how their dog was untrained and potentially aggressive, etc, and the dog owner failed to follow these rules. In that case, they are liable to pay for all the damage their dog has caused. I don't know if this was a TV comedy case or if this is a real case in the real world, but I must say that I disagree with how the judge treated it, because it was unprofessional and disrespectful, even if the result was "fair".
Ok so I heard some people say that the dog can’t be super vised all the time but that’s the risk not only for dog sitters but every business have risk. In addition the dog was suppose to be supervised at all times anyways because that’s the job of the sitter. Lastly her claim was completely trash saying training yadaya but as a dog sitter ur so pose to watch that dog to NOT cause truble. The judge/judy had common sense and put that together
Okay, but the judge doesn't have to show impoliteness towards her. Although the girl who spoke is wrong, I felt bad for her in some way. 😔
Okay, but this is a RUclips Short and the judge would’ve heard a lot of irrelevant, impolite stuff from the girl, before the judge made her decision.
@RosieRoseee313 As a judge who took a vow to their profession, they should be able to consider every actions they do. They're being called "Professionals" for a reason, yet what she did was clearly unprofessional and not ethical. 😐
Judges are human too. Waste their time with useless nonsense and they‘ll blow you off. That‘s just how it is. Remember this before you go to court over something stupid. They will act the same.
@Bruh-mr2zq, the girl was wrong? The dog wreaked havoc in her house, and she wanted its owner to pay for it. Am I missing something?
@ You seem to be missing the part where she accepted money in exchange for taking the dog into her house while taking care of it. All damage happened under her supervision.
I thought the fastest case was a guy wearing a dolphin jersey and went to court charged for stealing a dolphin jersey
“I disagree with you” 🤓🤓
“Goodbye!” 😈👋
She admitted she never saw the dog do the damage 😂
Judge Judy is standing on business
That judge has had 1 too many years on earth😂
That wave at the end 😂
kinda rude tbh
Damn that judge is so unprofessional. That was not a flex
Judy is drunk here😭
The entire point of a pet sitter is to watch the pet.
I pet sitted a dachshund, and she chewed up the cord of my electric blanket, causing it to be inoperable. Her owners said she never chews on anything. I said "well she did this time." I asked them to replace my blanket. They did not!
Me hitting my pillow thinking it was the judge☺️
That judge must be drunk
A good pet owner treat and taught their pets well.
Judge wasn't fair ❌❌
Savage judge ☠️☠️☠️
In a sense, the lady was right in this case
The owner should've told her that her dog had the tendency of destroying things or at least let her know her dog wasn't trained to know not to destroy things, it's the owners job to inform the sitter about the type of dog the sitter is caring for ESPECIALLY if the dog is going to the sitters house and not being taken care of in their own home
This so called judge needs to be locked up 😂😂😂
The judge is like my 4th grade teacher
Huge L to this judge doesn’t even know what real property damages are meant to be for
Her attitude at the end was hilarious!! 🤣🤣
the dog was trained to not cause damage, the owner was not trained to watch after the dog
Pov: when you have minute until lunch
Legally the plaintiff does have the remedy to claim damages in this case, also the cost which was spend by the plaintiff on dogs care like food, medical treatment if given etc.
More smart ass judges just what the world needs😂😂
Judge Judy has disappointed us several times.. she's very opinionated and many times quite rude... I don’t understand... the public or the producers tolerate this 😢😢
Judge is highly disrespectful
Judge is highly respectful... Dont blame her
@@Er.Praveenraj Yeah, we saw how respectful she was
@@Er.Praveenraj yeah we know how respectful she is in this and in a case of doctor video we saw very gentle women
Cry about it
You dont deserve respect when you are wrong.
That how you gonna learn your lesson.
Wrong people demanding respect is what turn this world upside down.
And sometimes you gonna see killers demanding respect.
The dog owner should have warned about not teaching their dog anything..... She should pay at least 1,000$
Are you outside your mind right now? She shoulda been doing her job and watching the dog.
You were charged for stealing a Dolphin Jersey
This Injustice literally 😊
How is it injustice
She was paid to watch the dog and also when you take care of a dog you have to ask questions 🤦🤦
@Wealth-v8b if she had time to explain maybe she would have said the woman lied about how well trained her dog is.
She is the worst judge I have ever seen
@@purplekissy hmm ok true i agree
@purplekissy are you implying you think someone would lie about how well their dog was trained? maybe they wouldn’t have sent their dog to a dog sitter knowing they’re untrained? put some thought into that before you defend a person who was supposed to be watching a dog in their house, either way if the dog sitter noticed the dog was untrained as soon as they entered the house this wouldn’t have been an issue? there’s no use in taking this into court, unless they’re trying to embarrass themselves :)
We dont know what happen but... if you babysitting a dog, the owner may inform you about the dog. His trigers, discomfort, illness. How to calm him. If the dog has a problem and you are not inforned, the owner may pay for demage the dog cause. The dog cant tell you if they feel bad. Destroying things is self defence mechanism in 99% cases. I live with dogs for 30 years. And they dont destroy for no reason (being under 1 year puppy with no training is another thing )
"fast women and slow horses will ruin your lifee"
Underrated comment
Irrelevant as my back passage
@@nayanjyotibaruah3858 dayum
completely mad judge😂
I love Judge Judy sm-
If anybody was wondering it was 33 seconds
😂 well your honor her dog 🐕 spoke to me & my dog is deaf & mute 2 different dogs your honor 😂😂😂
Wow this comment section has made me lose faith in humanity, your a dog sitter, you watch the dog and feed the dog, if the dog destroys something it’s your fault because you are the person looking after it, same with a toddler, also to play devils advocate how do we know this dog sitter didn’t intentionally destroy stuff and blame the dog or intentionally let the dog destroy stuff, we don’t know how big or small or aggressive this dog is but cmon people it’s not a wild animal it’s a domesticated dog, judge judy is 1000% correct
It’s like hiring a house sitter and they burn down the house and blame the home owner for not telling them how the oven works, it’s a fucking oven and you should have been doing your job making sure the house doesn’t burn down
Or hiring a babysitter who lets the kids destroy the house and then blame the parents for how they raised them
Point is the dog wouldn’t have been able to destroy anything had she been doing her job, thank you
They been in the car for like 20 minutes 💀 like get on with it lol.
Think of it like this, you don't know if the pet sitter was doing her job properly. You also can't know if they purposefully made the pet do something that would cause damage. That's why the liability can't fall onto the owner. The judge behavior is still unacceptable however, very unprofessional.
99% of these comments dont know what is the responsibility of dog sitting😂😂😂
So short I could fit in a RUclips short 💀
I personally think this case is unfair as if the owner hasn’t told the pet sitter of its previous behavior she would be at fault for not warning her. She had a very valid point.
How does that judge not do anything about that when someone else’s dog destroys someone’s house?😂😂 bad judge
The theory that you are responsible for your pets
If she was not a dog sitter then yes she has right lawfuly to get covered dmg from the dog owner but if she accept the dog as dog sitter then it is in her responsibility what the dog does during that time, if you don't keep an eye on the dog then why are you dog sitter ?
Also, she said "she should have informed me absout her dog" no, you should have been aware and even ask if you are worried that much. Even it is the calmest dog in the world, accidents can happen, it is fully in your responsibility during dog sitting time.
Intoxicated with power.
If you dog is rowdy, she has evey right to know before pet setting.
One Karen as an judge 😅😅😅
Why does this old lady shout? 😂
Ia this justice in america?? 😅
That was actually the most disrespectful and straight up unprofessional and rude. I’ve ever seen a Judge act I don’t have a pacific stance on the case itself, but I do think that the manner in which she held a court was very rude
Bye felicia!😂
Also judges don’t take people with dyed hair seriously
She rly tried the “I disagree with the judge” method! 😭
POV your mom tells you no
the Judge lowkey tweakin
I'm disappointed in Judy on this one
Sorry but you do have a responsibility to train your dog to behave when its in someone's care. If your dog bites the pet sitter or someone else when the pet sitter is watching it that is a sign if irresponsibility on the owners part! Yes you actually do have a responsibility to train a dog if you are keeping it elsewhere
Judge Judy is being very unpleasant as usual!
but then we have:
“So sir you were accused with stealing a dolphins jersey..”
To take it to court how much damage did this dog do
Top ten coldest moments
Judge, this is causing you damage in the public eye.
She needs to be fired shes rude and unprofessional she shouldnt be a judge and she hardly understands any of the cases
😂😂😂😂 she asked her if her dog talk to her ,killing me 😂lol she was
I strongly disagree with judge Judy in this one
I would take this matter Supreme Court
Well if someone is paying you for pet sitting....u dont leave the pet alone and if u do? Its your responsibility not the actual owner😂
The case lasted more than just a minute. You can watch the full version - it lasts about 5 minutes.
YHIS KUDGR IS JUST VERY RUDE & UNCOUTH,I CANT WAIT FOR JUDGE JUDY TO RETIRE!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
the judge is VERY unprofessional.