New photo simulations show proposed Interstate Bridge replacement in real-world settings

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 90

  • @legoandsushi
    @legoandsushi Месяц назад +26

    Another draw bridge option??? Why??? Congestion again plus we have to pay a toll to wait... SMH

    • @samuelspace101
      @samuelspace101 Месяц назад +2

      Its hard and expensive, the area is flat and low, so making a bridge tall enough to account for the major shipping traffic is difficult, but not impossible there’s been proposals however the Life Guard needs to sign off with the new designs which may include restructuring some old really tall boats.

  • @brianz4900
    @brianz4900 Месяц назад +9

    This should have been a tunnel. The bridge either needs to be the same height as the 205 bridge or remain a draw bridge in order to accommodate navy/coast guard vessels. Personally, I think we need a 3rd bridge/tunnel option on the westside to divert traffic away from downtown.

  • @zorlin6
    @zorlin6 Месяц назад +5

    We should go with a tunnel instead. Vancouver, BC is rebuilding one of their freeways to use a bridge under the Fraser River.

  • @jackspaeth7144
    @jackspaeth7144 Месяц назад +16

    We are going to spend insane amounts of money, make it iconic. Golden gate style. This region needs something like that.

  • @chrisw443
    @chrisw443 Месяц назад +8

    They are continuing to put brand new buildings in where this bridge is going like come on figure it out people.

  • @phoebirune7726
    @phoebirune7726 Месяц назад +3

    it amazes me how they want to further seperate the city by putting this massive freeway here.

    • @PeterOliver
      @PeterOliver Месяц назад

      It includes pedestrian bike and rail to connect the citiies further. Vancouver developers were moronic to put their "Waterfront" right next to what was known to be a giant infrastructure project since the 90's. This wasn't exactly a shock that this was going to happen.

  • @JustFrozen77
    @JustFrozen77 Месяц назад +7

    i dont care what it looks like. i just want a safe, functional bridge that isnt 100+ years old that doesnt stop for boat traffic making your commute 2-3 hours

  • @iusethisplatform
    @iusethisplatform Месяц назад +22

    God that concrete thing is horrific. Could they at else try to give it SOME beauty? Leave stuff like this in the last century

    • @vedacarmony5754
      @vedacarmony5754 Месяц назад

      Please address me as Your Highness.

    • @davidanderson1451
      @davidanderson1451 Месяц назад +1

      please build it with the priority to move traffic and not a "beauty". Decorate it with a light system.

  • @AxionSmurf
    @AxionSmurf Месяц назад +21

    ChatGPT, draw me a picture of an expensive bridge

    • @Azazel2024
      @Azazel2024 Месяц назад +1

      This city should worry about its stench and bad image not expensive vanity projects

  • @singsongshow
    @singsongshow Месяц назад +12

    Almost 30 years of this crap and we still don't have a bridge. Millions wasted. Where is the light rail in the design? Why are Americans so ok with living in mediocracy? When I was living in Japan, they completed a tunnel connecting tohoku and hokkaido with a bullet train under the sea floor. What the hell is wrong with us? We're pathetic compared to other parts of the world.

    • @zaurenstoates7306
      @zaurenstoates7306 Месяц назад

      Japan is also the size of 1.5 Oregons with 24 times the population. Even then the shinkansen costs almost as much as air travel.
      The MAX doesn't do a good job selling rail travel either, sooo slow.

    • @singsongshow
      @singsongshow Месяц назад

      @@zaurenstoates7306 yeah and they also have a luxury train that's like $10,000 per night, so what? what's so damn hard about building a bridge with a tram on it, across the river? A project like this for the Japanese would be a no brainer and done in a year.

    • @zaurenstoates7306
      @zaurenstoates7306 Месяц назад

      @@singsongshow it's a no brainer for Japan as they have a ton more people to move and excellent light rail in the large cities. A few of those cities house the entirety of Oregons population.
      I'm personally for adding and improving light rail, but comparing our needs to Japan should have some context attached
      The price of the shinkansen is relevant context too, the tourist pass is a great deal but outside of that it's just about equivalent to flying. That's with their clock work schedules, high ridership and excellent connectivity. I'm skeptical that hsr can take off without first having robust light rail networks and the populations to support.

  • @neilybobmojo_railfanning
    @neilybobmojo_railfanning Месяц назад +1

    No one has even tried to develop a tunnel idea instead. It would satisfy the airspace restrictions of PDX and the Pearson airfield, the Coast Guard clearance issues, and would not look at all as ghastly as these bland and monstrous bridges. And don't say it can't be done. BC is currently building a tunnel across the Fraser River in the same soil conditions across a similarly sized river.

  • @AdamHarrisonEros
    @AdamHarrisonEros Месяц назад +43

    I've got to say, neither design is particularly attractive. How about a design people will want to look at for the next 100yrs.

    • @BellaMirelli
      @BellaMirelli Месяц назад +1

      I personally love suspension bridges, and i know we have a few of those already but I just find those so cool. And they don't take up too much of the view. And above all, the new bridge just needs to fix the traffic. I 5 north in north Portland after like 2 PM is so bad, and I'm glad I don't have to drive it as much as others but yeah, the bridge currently causes so many backups

    • @davidanderson1451
      @davidanderson1451 Месяц назад +6

      How about we build a bridge for movement of vehicles and not "make it attractive". It is a freeway bridge and needs to avoid a draw bridge design.

    • @Kossimer
      @Kossimer Месяц назад +1

      @@BellaMirelli It can't be a suspension bridge. Pearson Airfield is historic and can't be moved, limiting the bridge's height. And the Coast Guard is asking for 178 feet of clearance, about 60 more the the current bridge, limiting how low it can be. It's going to be a narrow, boring slice.

  • @Mikerascan
    @Mikerascan Месяц назад +3

    Just make a tunnel and drop the spans.

  • @NanuqoftheNorth
    @NanuqoftheNorth Месяц назад +3

    These hideous bridge images make an excellent justification for building a tunnel instead.

  • @samuelspace101
    @samuelspace101 Месяц назад +2

    Why are the interchanges so massive?
    I thought there were solutions that were cheaper to get rid of these massive interchanges like roundabout bridge interchanges.
    That’s peoples property.
    Seriously remove the whole historical library and Theator, also some of the massive buildings?

  • @Chris-em4fl
    @Chris-em4fl Месяц назад +8

    No draw bridge

  • @AxionSmurf
    @AxionSmurf Месяц назад +26

    Well it sure is ugly. They got ugly 100% covered.

    • @SamuelGere
      @SamuelGere Месяц назад

      The bridge that have now is ugly

    • @AxionSmurf
      @AxionSmurf Месяц назад +7

      @@SamuelGereThe bridge we have now is already built

    • @samuelspace101
      @samuelspace101 Месяц назад

      @@SamuelGere Nuh uh, I’ve done a lot of photography in the area, it is really beautiful but sadly it is WAY to old, and needs to go.
      But I wish they had better proposals

  • @PenandInk2012
    @PenandInk2012 Месяц назад +15

    This is absolutely hideous…even as a concept. They are going to screw up the waterfronts on both sides. Either build a tunnel or revitalize the existing structures and add toll bridges east of the 205 and west of the 5 near Cornelius Pass.

    • @MrWiseinheart
      @MrWiseinheart Месяц назад +2

      Man I've been saying that too two extra Bridges would make so much more sense...

  • @ericambros
    @ericambros Месяц назад

    I like that things are FINALLY starting to look like what sci-fi movies of my youth said the 2000s would look like.

  • @withdoug93
    @withdoug93 Месяц назад

    I like the cap by the MAX stop. Should help cut down on noise while you're waiting for the train. Waiting at the stops next to 84 and 205 sucks. Definitely looking forward to easier transit access to Vancouver. Hopefully the service is frequent and runs later into the night.

  • @trevorlongman3783
    @trevorlongman3783 Месяц назад +14

    This project simply cannot move forward as currently proposed. It’s over budget, not climate friendly, and will completely destroy the booming Vancouver waterfront with noise and ugliness. The proposed alignment goes over the top of the new waterfront market building. I wish they would more thoroughly consider a tunnel option.

    • @MrWiseinheart
      @MrWiseinheart Месяц назад +4

      Or build two other bridges one by Cornelius pass one by Camas.

    • @johnrose7212
      @johnrose7212 Месяц назад

      I lived in sanfrancisco, and grew up here. Oregonians just dont get it, the 205 bridge is a prime example

    • @forgottenman8629
      @forgottenman8629 Месяц назад +1

      @@MrWiseinheart indeed, by doing so it would ensure the city of Portland would not have 'any' say in it, now to get Tri-Met out of the picture...

  • @earthlingjohn
    @earthlingjohn Месяц назад +1

    Don't call that a draw bridge. It is a lift span bridge. A draw bridge is like the Broadway and Burnside and Morrison.
    Would like to see a design concept for a swing span bridge similar to the old railroad bridge

  • @popdefender460
    @popdefender460 Месяц назад +25

    what stands out to me the most is how plain and ordinary these designs are. The drawbridge design is just plain ugly. There is an opportunity here to add some character to the area. A draw, something you would see on postcards and know exactly where it is. It can be functional and artistic as well. Why more 60's and 70's looking eyesores. Fire these people and get more creative ones.

    • @MrWiseinheart
      @MrWiseinheart Месяц назад +1

      Meet the New Gen z designers... 🤣

  • @lezhaaa1
    @lezhaaa1 29 дней назад

    how long will it take them to build the new bridge, if it takes a long time, then we are stuck with just 205 bridge and that will be horrible with all the traffic

  • @noaho8457
    @noaho8457 Месяц назад +2

    We do need to build a new bridge that is true. But can you at least make it not look so hideous. It looks like the kinda brutalist, lifeless concrete behemoth that destroyed many city skylines.

  • @esspeetwentytwo
    @esspeetwentytwo Месяц назад

    We need something in a traditional style and iconic, not brutalist and an eyesore. I'd love something like the St. Johns bridge or maybe even the Fremont. We do NOT need another Marquam.

  • @coryzeller6251
    @coryzeller6251 Месяц назад +2

    Yuck…as a Vancouverite, they could do better. Don’t ruin our beautiful waterfront and skyline.

  • @RexYoung206
    @RexYoung206 Месяц назад

    Word to the Wise: One of the reasons Seattle got rid of its Alaskan Way Viaduct was due to the way it blocked the view of the water with ugly concrete.

    • @Azazel2024
      @Azazel2024 Месяц назад

      Viaduct? Vhy no a chicken ?

  • @alyx2641
    @alyx2641 Месяц назад +4

    These options are awful and will completely destroy the Vancouver waterfront. The IBR team needs to revisit the immersed tunnel idea.

  • @JohnPeterPressonProtopsaltis
    @JohnPeterPressonProtopsaltis 29 дней назад

    Is this going to displace the Hayden Is residents (floating home owners etc)?

  • @kennethhamilton5323
    @kennethhamilton5323 Месяц назад +2

    How I. The hell did this make the news. These are terribly unfinished plans with abysmal accuracy

  • @matthewadventureexploratio6596
    @matthewadventureexploratio6596 Месяц назад +1

    I pick the first one cause we need to Eliminate the Draw Bridge

  • @jamesmurray8558
    @jamesmurray8558 Месяц назад

    Went across that bridge many times.

  • @kennethhamilton5323
    @kennethhamilton5323 Месяц назад

    How could we consider a draw bridge when there is a double decker option??!!

  • @ChristopherSEA
    @ChristopherSEA Месяц назад +3

    The bridge would likely have been completed by now and at a fraction of the cost if the damn government officials agreed on the project 20 years ago.

  • @ianthatcher3326
    @ianthatcher3326 Месяц назад

    They could move the hurtle building west on wheeles or jacks rather then demolish it

  • @TheCommunicationCoach
    @TheCommunicationCoach Месяц назад

    Show us downtown Portland's I5 new look, as IF they'll ever do anything about it. This is just one more screwover for SWWA, enabled by our own horrific local politicians. Horrible.

  • @candyjensen8971
    @candyjensen8971 Месяц назад

    The draw bridge is super ugly with the huge plain stones sticking out. Perhaps get a few local artists to add some appeal to your plans or perhaps clear pointed quartz that you can light up at night.

  • @DavidChristians-nz7ne
    @DavidChristians-nz7ne Месяц назад

    Drawbridge is my fav

  • @ralphbieker8104
    @ralphbieker8104 7 дней назад

    THIS BRIDGE, IS THE BIGGEST FRAUD EVER COMMITTED ON THE OREGON TAX PAYER !!! THE PRICE TAG IS UNBELIEVABLE, CONSIDER THE EAST COAST BRIDGE REPAIR, IS ONLY ONE HUNDRED MILLION AND IS TWICE AS THE COLUMBIA RV. BRIDGE !!!

  • @mrmja50
    @mrmja50 Месяц назад

    all that cost and time, why still consider a draw bridge?

    • @Herman-f9m
      @Herman-f9m Месяц назад +1

      Why still consider a draw bridge? Because the Coast Guard has final say over access for river traffic, and to meet international treaties there is a minimum height the bridge must be. It's a hell of a lot more intrusive and expensive to build the entire bridge that high than it is to use a drawbridge. Besides, the existing bridge only opens about once per day, and they won't open it during rush hour. Yes, it's inconvenient when it does open, but it really isn't a major problem in the overall scheme of things. Lots of tough decisions to make here.

  • @cobrafpv2334
    @cobrafpv2334 Месяц назад +2

    Can’t wait for light rail

  • @rsnell22
    @rsnell22 Месяц назад

    They should have kept the Figg design, but it was thrown out due to not having light rail, which Clark County, WA continues to vote against. It also did not interfere with commercial river traffic. Your tax dollars at work.

  • @Prxyshj
    @Prxyshj Месяц назад

    I don’t get why people call these ugly. They look in line with other modern bridges. The main issue isn’t the aesthetics. It’s going to be the cost overruns and the long timelines. Leave it to our governments to waste our hard earned money.

  • @sketchypeoplepdx
    @sketchypeoplepdx Месяц назад

    A drawbridge option on an interstate? Again? I'd think there's a better workaround. I know some of the largest engineering solves would be the on/off ramps on either side. Just get an earthquake ready bridge that can handle the traffic AND light rail and let's get 'er done. At this point I could kinda care less of the design (no drawbridge!) and let's just get an updated span to better server the people.

    • @Azazel2024
      @Azazel2024 Месяц назад

      There aren't any " earthquake " ready bridges you dork

  • @bentyson5168
    @bentyson5168 Месяц назад

    Thanks for showing this. These are extremely disappointing from a design and visual engineering standpoint. Has no one been to another modern city like, uh, Seattle... or San Francisco... or any modern European German city with beautiful bridges? Can we not spend some money to build something beautiful that doesn't look like every other highway onramp out there ? Very disappointing that these 2 designs look like every single I-10 swamp overpass traversing northern Florida. We can and should pressure government to do better.

  • @valeriehooks5137
    @valeriehooks5137 Месяц назад

    We don’t want max, we don’t want tolls, we don’t want Portland’s crime, and we don’t want your ugly bridge. Also if you don’t fix the Rose Quarter how is this going to alleviate traffic?

  • @LeightonEdwina-k5f
    @LeightonEdwina-k5f Месяц назад

    Miller Melissa Garcia Michael Jones Michael

  • @davehutchins2820
    @davehutchins2820 Месяц назад

    This is nothing to be getting excited about. Can anyone remember something as long as 10 years ago? Millions and I mean millions were spent on this same project with no results. Now we need a new design? Are bridge designers and planners dumber than a box of rocks? No doubt.

  • @johnrose7212
    @johnrose7212 Месяц назад

    those concrete designs are perfect for Oregon, UGLY as ever, and not inviting

  • @justinlee42
    @justinlee42 Месяц назад +1

    Looks fine. Build it. Get it over with.

  • @hotttt28
    @hotttt28 Месяц назад

    I'll believe it when I see it !

  • @vedacarmony5754
    @vedacarmony5754 Месяц назад

    Could we see a simulation of a ship striking a pillar?

  • @Azazel2024
    @Azazel2024 Месяц назад

    Lol get the fruit outta here you dorks

  • @hotttt28
    @hotttt28 Месяц назад

    It sucks !

  • @amattyg
    @amattyg Месяц назад

    People in Vancouver complained about the MAX bringing crime and now they're complaining about a FREEWAY bridge. To paraphrase Allen Iverson, "We're talking aboout a freeway bridge, not a street bridge, not a street bridge. A freeway bridge. Not a street bridge. Urbanists go out there to city hall to speak for us the people who are the forgotten working class who go out to work everyday wondering if some selfish person in a Ford F 150 is going to cut into a crosswalk or into a bike lane and run us over while people in Vancouver are complaining about not only what doesn't matter but also harming millions of Americans each day with their tired, tried, ineffective, harmful and bigoted NIMBY logic. The people of Europe and Asia figured out what works a long time ago while we're stuck in the 1950s. Look where that got us, while these people were being them whining about welfare queens we elected a nepo baby and an actual welfare king acting like a spoiled kid in a grocery store that didn't get any candy because he's never stepped foot in one throughout his lifetime. No black woman in history has came anywhere near a fraction of the debt this guy has accumulated yet these people are whining about bridges and calling the cops on people just for not looking like them while my siblings and I worry about if we'll survive and get by 2025. Don't talk to us about how we're less than you and Rene Gonzalez is working class when we're the ones on the ground doing actual work. Not speeding around Portland like they own us and have the right to harm us."

    • @Azazel2024
      @Azazel2024 Месяц назад

      Can't hear you with that stupid mask , what are you a train robber? Also, black people are like 14 % of America ..not every goddamn thing is about YOU .Jesus christ you whine

    • @Azazel2024
      @Azazel2024 Месяц назад

      None of your crap made sense angry little activist

  • @charlesalden9167
    @charlesalden9167 Месяц назад +1

    Still talking this crap new bridge to replace the old I-5 Bridge over the Columbia River. This is been going on 20 years

    • @Herman-f9m
      @Herman-f9m Месяц назад

      It took 40 years of talking before they built the Golden Gate bridge. Maybe we need more talking. Maybe we need a tunnel.