Streaming Wars 2024: Which Streaming TV Services Will Last?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 июл 2024
  • In the streaming wars between media companies like Netflix, Disney, Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount, and Comcast, who is winning? In this video, I break down the state of the streaming TV industry and highlight which streaming services I predict will last into 2024 and 2025, and which will shut down.
    🎥Videos worth checking out🎥
    →Is Paramount+ Shutting Down?: • Is Paramount+ Shutting...
    →Prime Video w/ Ads: What You Need to Know: • Amazon Prime Video wit...
    →How Netflix Has Changed: • Netflix is not the sam...
    📝 Chapter Times 📝
    State of the Movie Theater Industry 1:05
    Why Streaming Isn’t Profitable 01:55
    The Future of Streaming 05:24
    Netflix 05:57
    Prime Video 06:38
    Disney+ & Hulu 07:38
    Which Streaming Services Might Shut Down in 2024? 08:20
    Paramount+ 08:32
    Peacock 08:43
    Max 08:56
    AMC+ and STARZ 09:27
    Apple TV+ 09:41
    RUclips TV, Hulu + Live TV, & Fubo 09:56
    _____________________________
    Let's stay in touch!
    🔵 FB: / shallistreamit
    🐦 Twitter/X: / shallistreamit
    ✉️ Newsletter: shallistreamit.com/newsletter
    🎬Shall I See It? Movie & TV Reviews: / @shalliseeit
    _______________________________
    Thank you so much for watching!!!
    Make sure to like, comment, and subscribe
    ✌️ Over and out,
    Matt, host of "Shall I Stream It?"
    Contact: matt AT shallistreamit DOT com
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 86

  • @Caoimhin777
    @Caoimhin777 6 месяцев назад +12

    The tagline for Alien vs Predator seems appropriate “Whoever Wins…We Lose”

  • @RH1812
    @RH1812 6 месяцев назад +12

    When Amazon starts showing ads you know streaming isn’t the be all and end all

    • @RealMacJones
      @RealMacJones 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@SuperLeandro4563 Bruh just close the app

    • @ememobongnkana
      @ememobongnkana 2 месяца назад +2

      Are you sure it’s not just copy and paste because Netflix started it so everyone followed suit…

  • @MattZaycYT
    @MattZaycYT 6 месяцев назад +22

    Apple TV+ is underated. Everything they produce has a standard of quality far superior to anything else other companies do.

    • @alexelijah1982
      @alexelijah1982 6 месяцев назад +4

      Very true. Not to mention, if you have an Apple TV 4K, they stream at a higher bit rate. Their shows look amazing with the right set up. Netflix should take note. With their crappy streaming bit rates.

    • @SomethingSomewhereJustOnce
      @SomethingSomewhereJustOnce 3 месяца назад +1

      LOL, no. They just take the safe ideas and market it like an HBO show with a lot of astroturfing and boom you have Apple TV+.

    • @ememobongnkana
      @ememobongnkana 2 месяца назад +2

      I’ll take great storytelling over aesthetics. Netflix tells engaging stories; something Apple is still struggling with..

    • @Ann-sv7zx
      @Ann-sv7zx 2 месяца назад

      ​@@ememobongnkanaand also netflix gives good messages behind their series...

    • @RobertBarnett-ig3zy
      @RobertBarnett-ig3zy Месяц назад

      @@ememobongnkanaagree

  • @GeneSavage
    @GeneSavage 6 месяцев назад +10

    That's a shame about Paramount Plus. It seemed like a service looking for an audience when it started, but between shows like Tulsa King and its streaming of our local CBS affiliate, we've been watching it more and more.
    I'm grandfathered in with my internet plan to get Max, and love it, too. I fear every time there's a change in owners that it's going to be the end of the line for that deal. They've got a series based around Batman's Penguin that I really hope we get to see (and is actually good).
    If all of the currently available content survived the mergers, this COULD be a good thing, a one-stop shop similar to cable for everything streaming... but it seems like some content always gets tossed, and as you mentioned the prices are going up and up, meeting or surpassing cable if you have multiple services.
    Who had "cable becomes competitively priced with streaming services" on their 2024 bingo card?? (Not me!)

  • @kchishol1970
    @kchishol1970 6 месяцев назад +5

    When a FEW companies control a market, it is not a monopoly, (one company controlling a market) it is an OLIGOPOLY!

  • @nickperkins8477
    @nickperkins8477 6 месяцев назад +5

    The expansion of Disney+ was built into the app from the beginning. In 2017 or so, when Bob Iger announced the name of the app, the word “Plus” accommodates every bit of expansion the service has seen/will continue to see.

    • @FM-qq2kk
      @FM-qq2kk 6 месяцев назад +3

      paramount +is the same- added showtime- MGM is part of Prime so that leaves Starz- Cinemax- Curiosity Stream and a few other small ones
      the fight will be between Max- Peacock and Hulu to divide up the rest- Peacock would be wise to grab Starz to stay even with Paramount+ before another streaming app does

  • @nickperkins8477
    @nickperkins8477 6 месяцев назад +4

    In addition to originals(which I prefer at Netflix ) Amazon offers brand names in movies which Netflix can’t reach, monetarily.

  • @harrykatsaros
    @harrykatsaros 6 месяцев назад +5

    There’s only room for 2 players to be wildly successful with this streaming thing long term. This is how I see this all playing out over the next 5-10 years.
    1. WBD and Paramount merge. In a few years Comcast buys them. Eventually Amazon buys this combined company.
    2. Apple feeling the pressure to compete with Amazon buys Disney.
    3. Netflix can no longer compete with the 2 big tech behemoths with unlimited pockets and huge libraries. Netflix goes up for sale and Apple and Amazon duke it out for the last remaining big player.

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад +4

      I hate everything about this but it also sounds pretty accurate.

    • @TechxGremlin
      @TechxGremlin 6 месяцев назад +2

      The only thing with this is, Amazon would have to probably buy all of Comcast which I don't see happening easily, that's if Comcast wants to put itself up for sale. Companies you don't typically hear about being bought or the the idea of being bought but instead is doing the buying themselves in regards to entertainment is typically AT&T & Comcast, granted AT&T is mostly out of media now.

    • @scpatl4now
      @scpatl4now 6 месяцев назад

      @@TechxGremlin You know...we still have anti-trust law if they chose to use it.

    • @ememobongnkana
      @ememobongnkana 2 месяца назад

      Is Disney going to be selling to Amazon though?

    • @ememobongnkana
      @ememobongnkana 2 месяца назад

      @@tomcarson985Disney streaming/movies is a different department from their theme parks etc

  • @aminb
    @aminb 6 месяцев назад +7

    This was a great clip

  • @Otokichi786
    @Otokichi786 6 месяцев назад +4

    Spectrum is making a big deal about being "a new video streaming service." I guess they think that being the #4 cable TV network isn't enough and they want to "do it like Disney."

    • @judaegekikamen4223
      @judaegekikamen4223 5 месяцев назад

      Is it worth getting their platform

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  2 месяца назад

      Just made a video about it. I don't think it's quite worth it yet: ruclips.net/video/qHhY5lkLURs/видео.html

  • @johnreese7973
    @johnreese7973 6 месяцев назад +6

    I appreciate your shirt

  • @TechxGremlin
    @TechxGremlin 6 месяцев назад +3

    The one sleeper here is Warner Bros Discovery, I say buy paramount. Then focus on making the overall company successful and produce more HBO type quality content for Max and they could easily be going blow for blow with Disney. I honestly like a lot of Max's content! They just need people in the driver seat who truly want to see them win and are willing to do whatever it takes to be great.

    • @scpatl4now
      @scpatl4now 6 месяцев назад +2

      The problem is that WBD is so loaded with debt now for past M&A that taking on another debt ridden company is just going to make all that worse. You only borrow from Peter to pay Paul for so long before it all comes crashing down.

    • @TechxGremlin
      @TechxGremlin 6 месяцев назад

      @@scpatl4now Very true, they'll have to figure out their debt problems. If they can do that then they have potential otherwise it's potentially a slow death at this point. Probably an unpopular opinion, but the only company I'd trust with HBO/WBD is Apple at this point. Apple has showed they know how to do quality in my opinion with some of their Apple Tv+ shows.

  • @nickperkins8477
    @nickperkins8477 6 месяцев назад +3

    I think you are correct about the wisdom of combining Disney+ with Hulu. My remaining question there is ESPN+. As a subscriber to The Disney Bundle, I am wondering how Mr. Iger will handle launching the complete ESPN app he wants juggling with ESPN+. I think it would be wise to convert ESPN+ to what he wants, rather than launching a fourth app. Or, bring true Live TV to Disney+ in a huge Disney+ offering truly combining the three services.

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад +2

      I really hope, at minimum, they include ABC on Disney+ the way Paramount+ & Peacock do with CBS/NBC. It would be nice to be able to stream the Oscars on Disney+.

    • @nickperkins8477
      @nickperkins8477 6 месяцев назад +4

      @@ShallIStreamIt yes!! Live feeds of The Disney Channel, ESPN channels, and what Fox/FX products they can stream would be great. Max should do the same thing with its HBO and basic cable channels. It’s a luxury which Netflix can’t offer. When you are chasing them, always keep those types of things in mind.

  • @scpatl4now
    @scpatl4now 6 месяцев назад +2

    I agree with the analysis of who will stay and who will go. These Wall St types who invaded these companies just did not understand how streaming works. Netflix used to pay CBS/Viacom (aka Paramount) over a billion dollars for the rights to stream The CW shows after they finished airing. When they went with their own service, they pulled all that content behind their own streaming offerings along with the failure which was DC TV. They took a billion dollars of monetized content and put it behind their paywall where it generated a big fat zero. I don't know a lot of people that would subscribe just to watch that (and if they did they would drop it soon enough after watching it). That is just malpractice in this industry. Now they are kinda figuring out with going back to licensing content to Netflix at the cost of BILLIONS of dollars they lost because they didn't know what they were doing, and now we will all pay the price for it

  • @Basta11
    @Basta11 5 месяцев назад +4

    You are absolutely right about Peacock not being a good brand name. A customer would have to make the connection that its from NBC which is not a given these days. Not only that but it doesn't leverage the Universal brand at all since you'd have to know that its also part of the Comcast umbrella.
    What I'd like to see is an animation platform that combines Warner Brothers, Dreamworks, Cartoon Network, and Nickelodeon. I think that would be a must have competitor or complement to Disney for families.

    • @judaegekikamen4223
      @judaegekikamen4223 5 месяцев назад

      As much as I agree with you completely about an animation platform, there's too owners who would fight for licensing and how much of what content gets pushed. The hard truth is that profits are the focus not the satisfaction of the consumer.

  • @LL-kh7sc
    @LL-kh7sc 6 месяцев назад +1

    Prediction 2024 is going to be the year SHIF all round for everyone! With a lack of NEW content after the strikes. I am curious to see how the free services will affect the paid services (IE: Tubi vs Disney+/Hulu). How much does backlog catalog really matter when talking sub counts...

  • @scpatl4now
    @scpatl4now 6 месяцев назад +1

    My question is...if you want Disney+ and Hulu, do you have to buy 2 separate streaming plans? If so, well that would make them 2 different services regardless whether Disney owns both

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад +1

      For now, yes, you do have to pay for both. But I think that will start to change over time and they'll eventually merge.

  • @john-conner410
    @john-conner410 6 месяцев назад +2

    I am against the whole crack down on Password sharing on Netflix because they are doing for money.

    • @joshsimpson79
      @joshsimpson79 6 месяцев назад +3

      well, they are a business and yes, they are doing it for money.

  • @jacobdenton6065
    @jacobdenton6065 6 месяцев назад +3

    I’m still getting Criterion channel

  • @LarrysLibrary
    @LarrysLibrary 6 месяцев назад +2

    Where do you see Philo in all this?

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад

      Good question- Philo is owned in part by AMC Networks, Paramount, & WBD that all own a stake. Philo’s future will be affected by the other moving pieces as other companies go through mergers & acquisitions IMO.

  • @bionicwoman9884
    @bionicwoman9884 6 месяцев назад

    no mention of sling tv or directv stream?

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад +1

      Business-wise, I don’t think DirecTV or Dish (which owns Sling) are doing too hot and I know at least Sling has been losing subscribers. I think their respective companies will continue to kick the can down the road, though.
      As for others I didn’t mention- Philo’s future could be complicated as Paramount & WBD own stakes in it & both could merge/be acquired. Frndly will continue to exist, it’s profitable but has a specific niche. Vidgo is dead. LocalBTV is dead.

  • @Kev4Kev
    @Kev4Kev 6 месяцев назад +1

    How is Max a better brand than Peacock ? It is way to generic adds tons of confusion. If you were to do a search for max on any search engine if you were to type the word max in with no other context would the streaming service pop up? Peacock on the other hand if more memorable, only has one other thing that could pop up during a search the animal named Peacock that in itself makes it better. Max is the equivalent of calling a streaming service streaming or calling a soda brand soda its way to generic.

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад

      I see your point. But I’ve also seen Peacock’s name as the butt of one too many unfortunate jokes.
      It’s interesting to see WBD use “CNN Max” as their branding for the news section and I think “(insert title)-Max” will be something they’ll use for additional add-ons in the future. I don’t LIKE this idea but I wouldn’t be surprised to see them make HBO a premium tier add-on and bring back “HBO Max” for the premium tier’s branding (similar to what Paramount did w/ Showtime).

  • @AaronCal-yk8fc
    @AaronCal-yk8fc 6 месяцев назад

    Do u know if MAX will Reach in The Caribbean n Latin America this Febuary like in 🇧🇿

    • @bionicwoman9884
      @bionicwoman9884 6 месяцев назад +2

      they plan to expand but when we dont know I have max in the US

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад +2

      Their website says this: “We anticipate that Max will be available in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2024. Stay tuned for more info.”
      That’s all we’ve got for now though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • @John24Russell
    @John24Russell 2 месяца назад

    How about Apple TV Plus

  • @joshuapowell1868
    @joshuapowell1868 6 месяцев назад

    Everything is proven we don't need the in to which tv

  • @loulopez554
    @loulopez554 6 месяцев назад

    Hasn't Peacock already shut down in the U.K.?

    • @juanthompson8016
      @juanthompson8016 6 месяцев назад +1

      Universal needs to buy Paramount

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад

      Yup- although Comcast (which owns Peacock) has other services in the UK, like NOW TV.

  • @joshuapowell1868
    @joshuapowell1868 6 месяцев назад

    Vhs movies should out doing y'all's video now days y people are not lazy with vhs tapes and blue ray disc movies like they are with your video now days

  • @jimmymejia3153
    @jimmymejia3153 6 месяцев назад +2

    Netflix Prime Video and Hulu it’s all you Need!

    • @juanthompson8016
      @juanthompson8016 6 месяцев назад +2

      Not with Netflix. They keep raising prices

    • @scpatl4now
      @scpatl4now 6 месяцев назад

      @@juanthompson8016 They are ALL raising prices

  • @bizzfo
    @bizzfo 6 месяцев назад +3

    “Family friendly brands owned by Disney”, are you being sarcastic?

    • @ShallIStreamIt
      @ShallIStreamIt  6 месяцев назад

      Which brands would you consider to be family friendly?

  • @DGYtown
    @DGYtown 6 месяцев назад +2

    Knock knock, who’s there. Banana who. Orange 🍊 your glad I didn’t say banana

  • @sunraider0_0
    @sunraider0_0 6 месяцев назад +4

    Streaming services have killed entertainment

    • @queenofstamford3141
      @queenofstamford3141 6 месяцев назад +2

      Lol.. Cable was already killing it

    • @joshsimpson79
      @joshsimpson79 6 месяцев назад

      I think many things have. Greed, inflation, content over quality, too many options, etc. @@queenofstamford3141

    • @sosamanotf642
      @sosamanotf642 Месяц назад

      For you. This shit is way better than cable.

  • @sirducksworthythe3rd842
    @sirducksworthythe3rd842 6 месяцев назад +1

    None their all to expensive , and it's way cheaper just to by physical

    • @joshsimpson79
      @joshsimpson79 6 месяцев назад +1

      Except that physical could be drying up. Not to mention all the things that you may like that don't even get a physical release. Although with all of this potentially collapsing I could see a resurgence in physical media.

  • @OceanSoul1969
    @OceanSoul1969 6 месяцев назад +8

    Family friendly on Disney? I won’t give them one cent

  • @johng8362
    @johng8362 3 месяца назад +2

    NETFLIX SUCKS

  • @tasadiqhussain6008
    @tasadiqhussain6008 3 месяца назад

    I think I'll stick to my own dvd collection.