WATCH 24 hrs early, extended and ad-free on our Locals! triggernometry.locals.com/ CHAPTERS👇 00:00 Trailer 00:44 I went into my study assuming the police were racist 03:58 The surprising findings 07:28 Racist use of non-lethal force? 11:28 Protesting isn’t for me 12:29 I didn’t set out to cause controversy 15:14 Broken relationship between minorities and the police 18:37 Offsetting bias 21:22 SPONSOR: Munk Debates 22:26 My life got turned upside down 25:30 I refuse to lie 27:00 The narrative changed 29:10 Twitter labelled the paper as hate speech 30:05 Why were people upset about the positive results? 34:14 Academics were running scared 36:45 They changed the standards of evidence because they didn’t like the results 38:18 Truth is under threat 41:30 The Claudine Gay debacle 46:45 The true purpose of university 49:19 SPONSOR: Monetary Metals 50:52 Bias in publishing 53:28 How we fix this 57:28 Can academia be saved? 59:06 Academics need a moral compass 1:03:10 Professors afraid of students 1:06:00 What’s the one thing we’re not talking about?
Well, I can't lie either. Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction. Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
What a disappointment this man must be to his family, his community, and to his ancestors. One black man being a white supremacist’s ventriloquist dummy can do much, much, much, more damage than the bog standard white supremacist spouting white supremacist garbage. Shame on this lying collaborator and shame on the premeditated violence he is doing to the community of people who look like him.
Using 1 man and his 1 study to talk about the "facts" of police brutality. Not wanting to discredit the work of Roland Fryers, but, many studies, including ones criticising or picking apart Fryers results, point to different conclusions. This is not touched upon ...at all... Confirmation bias if ever I saw it. And there is not a single critical post in this comment section, so that appears to be what this audience is looking for.
@@Mesamedusa Dude, I am a brown immigrant. I've been stopped by the cops like 100-200 times. I haven't been stopped by cops for the past 10 years. I don't party & don't drive at night & I drive carefully. I am very polite with the cops. Actually, i was stopped recently, for supposedly not stopping at the Stop Sign. I told the cop that I have a camera, & I apologized in case it was true, & explained that it's probably the traffic conditions & I am working.... *(He just gave me a warning. And it's because the majority of the judges/attorneys will throw out the case, or or the worst case scenario, will ask me to pay 50% of the ticket). Look how the lawyers react to the traffic stop. They are extremely polite. There is no need to fight with the cops. You do it in court. There is no need for any type of confrontation or arguments. But I have friends who are speeding & arguing with the cops.... They drink & smoke in the car. And they are telling me that they are being stopped for no reason.
And that's precisely why they hate him. He's got the "right" identity politics but the "wrong" opinions. By which I mean a commitment to basic morality and scientific objectivity. The very best parts of Western culture. And therefore evil.
How you can possibly believe that is beyond me. Or maybe you don't know this. Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction. Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
He will suffer the same faith as people like Thomas Sowell. He will be somehow known and in some way relevant and appear. But the mainstream will never acknowledge him, his ideas or will even touch his topics to bring it to their audience. He will simply be ignored as good as it can be
No. It should have a narrative, just an explicitly a-political one like "we are a place to educate the people and advance knowledge as rigorously and truthfully as possible. We do not have any political agenda and we bow to no one and nothing, except the truth."
Too much money is tied up in Universities for them not to have narratives. I know it sounds like I am being conspiratorial, but every university has been in hot water for one reason or another (all due to being bought and paid for). You'll probably remember the elite students who were having their grades paid for. You may know that every scientific paper (especially the university led ones) has been compromised by stat doping and outright false information to show a particular narrative. You may be aware that the information being taught at universities is stepped on heavily by corporations and politicians. It boggles my mind that we still value post secondary education at all.
"The truth" is the historical narrative they pursued. And actually he even said in the interview; whether he proved one side or the other that he proved right, he didn't care. When you find the truth, you get the tools to fix the problem.
Actually, they should. A commitment to free speech and open discourse and independent research. That's a narrative. The problem is they have the wrong one.
This man is an actual, Social Justice Warrior in the true sense of the term, he is actually looking at justice, and not identity politics, no wonder he's hated.
The guy who literally misrepresent the findings of the study should be president? This whole comment section is proof you guys refuse to do any actual research and prefer to just engage in fallacy and a lot of appeal to authority.
his paper was written making assumptions and drawing conclusions, and coding their own data without posting the origional data. while its not impossible that the assertion made is true, its a sketchy paper and by no means woild bring integrity if scientests began making assumptions in order to get to a conclusion. The real truth is plenty of papers have presented evidence to the opposing argument, but the one that does is suddenly "this guy is right and knows all". its confirming what you already believe so its much easier to accept it as truth. theres plenty of pretty sound criticism that looks at his analysis fsctually that you can look up online.
the fact that a harvard professor didn't account for differential crime rates in his analysis should raise eyebrows... oh but keep clapping like a pack of trained seals.
And yet most people, most of the time, vote for the person who lies hardest, promote the people who lie most, and buy the newspapers who tell the biggest lies.
On the question of racial bias for routine stops where there is reported compliance... Could it be that there is a fear built from the experience since 50% of violent crime is committed by blacks who are only 13% of the population? I am assuming that the vast majority of that black violent crime is happening in the inner cities? Is this racial bias mainly happening in the inner cities?? My guess is a learned jadedness... For example, if you go to a store that frequently mis-prices their products, and you keep catching it at the register, you are far more likely to double check their prices, even if a good number of the prices are entered correctly. If so, how can we help police to not have that knee-jerk reaction??
As I've heard him what he said is that police are not racists, they're just undertrained, overarmed cowards with "us vs. them mentality" and shoot and brutalize everyone equally.
People hyper focus on the negative that being said there does need to be reform in the police namely in the self-policing department since we often see cops commit felonies and not be charged because the DA doesn’t want to hurt their relationship. Their department chooses to back them up instead of applying the law and cops use more force than required, in what I can only assume is an attempt to gain control in a situation which in many cases they have no right to use the force and are not charged for the subsequent assault and battery they commited
It is easy to say the cops should be unbiased, but when you know so many people are armed and you are stopping them for violating the law, one has to maintain a sense of self preservation.
My PhD was on the US South. Before I submitted, both of my supervisors advised me that if I left in the fact that there was parity between blacks and whites when discussing poverty, 'other Universities will not want me in the future'. I stated that it was 100% provable and all the stats since the 1870s prove it. They replied, that it doesn't matter, it's not the narrative universities want or supply funding for. I walked away from academia as soon as I got my Doctorate; with the stats left in. It's all a depressing rip off, money-making business. I would add that making black folk feel they're still oppressed is big business for select white groups; including universities.
Good man. If academia refuses to hold truth of information as the highest standard, then they don't deserve you. Truth, ESPECIALLY when it's ugly, is more important than ANY narrative
I'm guessing the same people who think they can't get an ID and do not know what the word "computer" means. The infantilization bothers me, and I'm only seeing it from the outside.
@@jshyoungblood You're are aware of how universities work I take it? Garnering to the current zeitgeist. Procuring funding through organisations that make money from such issues. Making it fashionable to potential students and their paying parents. Promoting issues which strengthen their stance on a subject. Only employing those willing to get on board. Do I need to go on? It goes as deep as you can look.
The bias he uncovered is in direct proportion to the self inflicted bad reputation of black culture. Thug life is real. The bad reputation will not be going anywhere anytime soon. The part that is unfortunate is when black individuals with good reputations are wrongly profiled as a thug. The bias is real because the bad reputations are real. Let’s recognize the bigger picture so we can put context on the bias. Roland had a Floridian slip at 11:58 when he began to say ‘why’ things are happening then quickly changed his word to ‘what’ was happening. I don’t think he is capable of exposing ‘why’ It should also be noted many thugs, bad elements, bad people have learned to be chameleons. When pulled over on a traffic stop a thug may appear a great citizen then whip out a gun and start shooting or reach for the officer’s gun all in the blink of an eye.
He points out what is happening but is unable to say why. I “ can “ tell you why. It doesn’t take a professor. The reputation of the black community is deeply stained and will remain that way. People refer to it as systemic racism but the truth is bad reputation manifests into perceived racism and it is the primary contributor to racial profiling. Everyone is entitled to their discernment.
Valuing truth above social acceptance, and facing the consequences that come with that, in my book, is the definition of moral courage. Well done this man.
The whole point of academia is to pursue the truth and bow to nothing else. The rest is just people doing bad stuff like fake status grabbing, prejudice or cowardice.
He started by talking about the backlash he faced by doing so, death threats included, so he should know better than most why people are afraid to tell the truth.
@@mattp7828 That's an oversimplification that glosses over the core issue - capitalism. When it's no longer about whether the result is scientifically significant, but whether the result has economic benefit for someone. If not, there's no funding. It used to be simply quality research could get funding. Not anymore.
If he is so sincere about helping people, how did he manage to leave this out? Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction. Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
They would scream at you for believing in objective truth. They only believe in “their truth.” There is no reality in the humanities, and they are trying to push their post modernist BS on everyone else. It is the Rich White Lady gang, and they will cancel you.
Wow - blown away by Roland. Extremely intelligent and steadfast. We're so lucky to have people like this that can help us see through the fog of hysteria.
It's very telling that the response to Roland's work from BLM wasn't: "Thank god we were very concerned about police fatalities, this is fantastic news"
@@brennangum6236 Absolutely! I think the problem with this issue and many other is people want an excuse to be angry or something to blame for why they're not where they want to be, not actually work on the issue. But for those who actually care, the first step in solving a problem is correctly identifying the problem and that's what Roland has done and why it's so valuable, if BLM are serious they should have taken this Data seriously and they didn't which is really disappointing.
Roland Fryer needs to be protected at all costs - He very well could be the next generations Thomas Sowell. That is compliment to Roland Fryer, Thomas Sowell is a global treasure.
Haha, we literally had the same thought. My words were a little different in my post, but my goodness I finish typing and look at the next few comments and bam there you are. You sir clearly have the capacity to see the big picture. Hurrah for you. Those of us with the eyes to see it, we must play our role, it's our obligation and our duty to those who can only see the details.
Being called all the pejoratives is a right of passage for any honest, black intellectual in this country. I'm sure he's heard them all before and has received threats, as well. Let's hope we get to see more of him and where his career leads.
Fryer should remain in academia and resist associating with think tanks with guiding political ideologies which would compromise the integrity of his research and other work.
Yet Fryer refuses to acknowledge SEVERAL other economic research studies(published in top economic journals such as his study was) that came out both before and after his study that find OPPOSITE results. ONE study doesn't constitute a consensus and Fryer KNOWS THATS THE CASE. He is far from an idiot. An Example Study: "Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls" by Mark Hoekstra
Direct result of diminished education in this country. Education must be our national first prioriety instead of interest in foreign policies that are wasteing our future for our children. Investing in educating is a must
It's not just kids. Look how Fox uses anecdotal images and plays them hundreds of times to insinuate crime is rising. Sometimes even the stuff they show lacks context
@@AH-te5gs Any real evidence of him sexually harassing his colleagues? No? Didn't think so. Y'all are so quick to immediately disbelieve a minority when his facts don't align with your feelings.
Depends on what truth you mean. When the naive child stated that the emperor was naked, was the emperor hurt because he was naked or hurt because he had been tricked? There's a difference. Only perverts enjoy being humiliated.
Yet Fryer refuses to acknowledge SEVERAL other economic research studies(published in top economic journals such as his study was) that came out both before and after his study that find OPPOSITE results. ONE study doesn't constitute a consensus and Fryer KNOWS THATS THE CASE. He is far from an idiot. An Example Study: "Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls" by Mark Hoekstra
So, there is a room with FDR, lincoln, and hitler arguing over if the final solution was morally correct. Does that saying still hold true? What about a room full of trump supporters and biden. Does that mean what biden says is true? Lets go with the opposite, room full of liberals and trump, does that mean trump speaks the truth? What about a room with ghandi, MLK and jeffrey dahmer arguing over the ethics of eating people.
The world needs more social scientists like Roland Fryer, who use data and evidence to draw accurate conclusions about what is happening. To have proved his own preconception on this subject to be incorrect and to be willing to talk about it openly is admirable.
He's still in denial about certain aspects of the demographic/crime situation. You wonder why the police are more likely to use force on certain groups? Well, that's very simple. The brain is a pattern recognizer and cops (like all humans) have a natural instinct to protect themselves from threats. It's impossible to turn your brain off and ignore patterns you're aware of when they're linked to your survival and safety. It's lizard brain stuff. When they ask cops to not profile, they're literally asking them to turn off one of the most basic instincts they have. The cops know that certain groups are overwhelmingly more likely to resist arrest, assault them, commit violent crime, etc. and so OF COURSE they are going to be more likely to use force against them. Mind you, a use of force can be something as simple as handcuffing a detained suspect because they're nervous that the suspect might try to flee or attack them, and I guarantee that is the VAST majority of the instances Fryer counted as a "use of force incident." So, what he's calling "racial bias" is more than likely just the cops using their basic instincts, training and experience to more effectively do their job. The only way to remove this knowledge aforethought in the minds of the police is if the PATTERNS STOP AND THE DATA CHANGES i.e. certain groups STOP COMMITTING OVERWHELMINGLY HIGHER LEVELS OF CRIME, INCLUDING RESISTING ARREST, FLEEING, ETC.
Hopefully he will realize that when it comes to education. Somehow the 0.5 bln Bill Gates Foundation experiment failed miserably at improving the educational outcomes, and they've tried everything under the sun.
@squibbelsmcjohnson Same here! Especially after the past four years. Who wants to believe a one world government is inbound, or digital slavery, 15-minute cities, cashless society, Great Reset, etc? I'm even a flat earther. My social life was so much better when I believed whatever the majority of scientists believed lol. Imagine being the only flat earther at a dinner party.
What a pleasant breath of fresh air this man is. This is what an academic should be, focused on truth seeking regardless of where it leads you, willing to stand behind his findings even if it's unpopular.
@@wonderings8973 If he could back it by solid research findings, it would be a whole lot less pleasant because what it says about American society as a whole. But I would still commend him for doing good research. Of course, those were the results he was expecting to find and the the results that his fellow academics wanted him to find. So it would have been less interesting in terms of following the data despite it being unpopular as it would have simply affirmed the popular narrative.
@@siggyincr7447 I think you'll find that many of the people praising him would NOT be supportive of research that didn't reaffirm what they already believed. I've seen far too much of that over the years
@@wonderings8973 Sure, confirmation bias is the norm for human beings. While his findings aren't surprising to me, that's not why I hold him in such high regard. He went ahead and published despite warnings that it could be bad for his career. This is what we need more of.
I remember reading about a study done by a couple of statistics experts who collected a whole lot of data about police doing traffic stops in a region where accusations of racial profiling were rife. They actually set out to prove the police were racist. The results showed the police did in fact pull black people over more often, but they found they also pulled black people over more often at night when they couldnt possibly have known the race of the driver. The data showed the bias was caused by black people breaking traffic laws more often and attracting more attention to themselves. So the narrative about racist police was driven by emotion and not data. That is a huge issue because if you dont want to be accurate about the nature of the problem you will never get an accurate solution that works.
An officer has discretion to issue a ticket. Driving is not discussed in the Constitution. In fact, most police departments didn't exist before the Civil War. White drivers break the laws to, but an officer is more likely to give a white person a warning. Go do the research on that.
"Stop and Frisk" in NYC - Black (60 percent). Latinx (27 percent). were white (8 percent). Asian / Pacific Islander (2 percent). (2021) Police found a weapon in about one out of six pedestrian stops last year and found a firearm in about one out of 13 stops Justice Department found Ferguson police officers routinely violate the Fourth Amendment in stopping people without reasonable suspicion, arresting them without probable cause, and using unreasonable force against them.Mar 4, 2015 Ferguson Missouri is 71% black
I read the same study. You can only have good discussions with people when you pull the emotions out and gather all the data. Good reminder, thank you.
At 44m. Larry is an intense and compelling man. I had the opportunity to go to Harvard. But when Larry was fired for simply asking research questions, I declined. Thanks, Roland, for sharing that story. And today, you and he are colleagues! A happy ending that’s yet another beginning.
Roland Fryer should be added to Trigonometry as one of your interviewers. He is an incredibly intelligent and well spoken individual. I love how he can challenge a thought with the sincere desire to understand a different perspective. Well done sir!
The most incredible thing about your statement is that Democrats read this and they have Republicans top of mind with examples when they say "You are right." Republicans have Democrats top of mind with examples when they say "You are right." And they are both right. A poor republican and a poor democrat have more in common with each other than either of them have with the rich in their own party.
Hes not the first. All the statistics have been known for years, even other black academics like Glenn Loury have said it. There is an epidemic of homicides, gangs and violence in the AA community that has been going on for decades, and we know around 75% of those crimes are never solved by police. We know if a blk person is harmed in the US, 99% of the time the perp is another blk person. We know a white person is many times more likely to be harmed by a blk person than the other way around. We know homicide is the leading cause of death for AA's and AA's is the only race where homicide or violence is the leading cause of death. All the stats are very clear but the left and the media say the opposite is true in some misguided attempt to help or protect them. This is how we got to a point where people can call for genocide in the streets and face no repercussions and stores are closing across the country from mob robberies and theres a total breakdown of law and order,
As a conservative I would love parts of the paper to be false, but the facts are the facts and you can't hide from that. Now it's time to research the details.
@@dsamh I’m just saying why is every one jumping up and down for him actually doing his job He says he wanted the opposite outcome so as people would like him .Honest. But everyone is acting like he’s exceptional because he isn’t being a typical ninja ? Right ? Omg look the ninja isn’t being a ninja WOW WHAT A REAL MAN 😂😂😂🤷
It's so refreshing to hear someone say, I don't know. This was a proper good faith conversation. Could have listened for hours. This is what academia should be about. The pursuit of truth.
Roland Fryer. The real deal. *Loved* this conversation, packed full of gems. His words about a *North Star* were both inspiring and poignant. Terribly Frustrating that we (Americans) can't seem to get this right.
@@grannyannie2948 Completely pathetic, the same as we had protests in Australia after the overturning of Roe v Wade. And as a result they expanded legal abortion in Australia from 20weeks to 25weeks which is just sick.
@@aidananstey9848 Yes I remember seeing videos from Sydney. I personally like Tasmania's approach. It's legal, but no doctor is willing to do one, regardless of weeks. I remember listening to the NSW parliament debating the issue. Feminists argueing for it to be raised for gender selection for people of cultures who don't want girls. It made my head spin. I think most Australians view this issue differently to Americans.
Thank you to Dr. Fryer for his good work and willingness to change opinion. My father was a dedicated cop for 18 years and always said to look at the statistics.
I am so SO happy to see Roland Fryer out and about. I remember when he first brought his research to light and it was a hopeful time. Now is really the time. The unreasonable voices had to massively fail in order to clear the stage for Dr. Fryer
A scientist has to have extreme curiosity and at the same time the detachment of a good jurist who weighs evidence regardless of where the conclusions lead. A remarkably small number of scientists are actually like that (I've met QUITE a few). And yes.. I've uniformly found people like this to be great men.
@@rbarnes4076 That became clear to me during C-19. Even the hard sciences are corrupt and stacked with knowledge gatekeepers in positions of power. Grant money applications will be denied if for example a scientist wants to undermine something such as germ theory. There's nothing scientific about declaring that the science is settled. More like soyence.
Thank you for your honesty. Don’t ever change. You have authentic integrity, and that is the most valuable human trait that can be attained. You’re a very good man.
Something I hear in professional investigations around disasters from meltdowns to plane crashes is, “Investigate with the intent to understand, not to get someone fired.” It’s a beautiful way to describe the need to understand what really happened to assure the necessary changes are made to assure something changes.
Just a reasonable, wise, and admirable intellectual. I wish all professors thought like this man. Im probably not alone in this but I would love to have a beer with him.
Here in Denmark arabs and blacks has very bad attitude etc. Not people from Far East etc Same pattern in all of Europe. Worse in Sweden....50 no go zones. Police have to come with weapons and many.
"It's easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled." We are seeing this time and time again in all areas of society. The best thing that ever happened to me was getting rid of my TV 15 years ago. It's amazing how your views change and life improves when you don't listen to propaganda.
@squibbelsmcjohnson Agree, but because I got rid of my TV so long ago, and have been watching social media since the beginning, long before it was censored, I'm in that fortunate position to find it easier to spot lies from truth and able to choose what I watch and who I listen to.
2005 was when I stopped. The line of work I was in at the time made watching tell-a-vision an inconvenience. After a few years I began noticing the effects of cessation. It's impossible to go back. The internet even changed too. 20 years ago the web was like the wild West. Now it's a corporate and dot gov nightmare. Even the alternative search engines such as DuckDuckGo and Brave have been altered. Thankfully I figured out how to effectively search for information to combat algorithms. Even so it's still much harder to get the same info that was available ten years ago. Back then if a person scrolled down a page or two, they were in the deep web. Now I can scroll all day and never be shown the correct information. I searched for the truth about black on white violent crime rates, and most of the results were about Dylan Roof. The algorithm is trying to scare people into not investigating by making the reader believe that if they read crime rate stats, they will become just like Roof lol!
Roland Fryer: “I’m going to find something about this and people are going to like me!” 😂 I like that he went in looking for the truth, and stayed with it rather than bending to political will.
I would only imagine that there’s a bunch of differences between Mr. Roland Fryer and his co-academics, but one of the things that stands out the most is Integrity. He’s shown himself to be a true scientist but with a great deal of integrity. And in a world where so many do not even understand that value, let alone demonstrate it.... He stands out as the shining star he is. Thank you Sir for not folding to the pressure.
Good to remember Fryer's study published in 2017. I'd bet that, since then, overall police interactions with blacks have become less aggressive whilst blacks have gotten more entitled and aggressive with police.
WATCH 24 hrs early, extended and ad-free on our Locals! triggernometry.locals.com/
CHAPTERS👇
00:00 Trailer
00:44 I went into my study assuming the police were racist
03:58 The surprising findings
07:28 Racist use of non-lethal force?
11:28 Protesting isn’t for me
12:29 I didn’t set out to cause controversy
15:14 Broken relationship between minorities and the police
18:37 Offsetting bias
21:22 SPONSOR: Munk Debates
22:26 My life got turned upside down
25:30 I refuse to lie
27:00 The narrative changed
29:10 Twitter labelled the paper as hate speech
30:05 Why were people upset about the positive results?
34:14 Academics were running scared
36:45 They changed the standards of evidence because they didn’t like the results
38:18 Truth is under threat
41:30 The Claudine Gay debacle
46:45 The true purpose of university
49:19 SPONSOR: Monetary Metals
50:52 Bias in publishing
53:28 How we fix this
57:28 Can academia be saved?
59:06 Academics need a moral compass
1:03:10 Professors afraid of students
1:06:00 What’s the one thing we’re not talking about?
28:15
You literally called the guy a "Demon Monkey"?!
🤣😂
Well, I can't lie either. Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction.
Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
What a disappointment this man must be to his family, his community, and to his ancestors. One black man being a white supremacist’s ventriloquist dummy can do much, much, much, more damage than the bog standard white supremacist spouting white supremacist garbage. Shame on this lying collaborator and shame on the premeditated violence he is doing to the community of people who look like him.
Using 1 man and his 1 study to talk about the "facts" of police brutality.
Not wanting to discredit the work of Roland Fryers,
but,
many studies, including ones criticising or picking apart Fryers results, point to different conclusions.
This is not touched upon
...at all...
Confirmation bias if ever I saw it.
And there is not a single critical post in this comment section, so that appears to be what this audience is looking for.
@@Mesamedusa
Dude, I am a brown immigrant.
I've been stopped by the cops like 100-200 times.
I haven't been stopped by cops for the past 10 years. I don't party & don't drive at night & I drive carefully.
I am very polite with the cops.
Actually, i was stopped recently, for supposedly not stopping at the Stop Sign.
I told the cop that I have a camera, & I apologized in case it was true, & explained that it's probably the traffic conditions & I am working....
*(He just gave me a warning. And it's because the majority of the judges/attorneys will throw out the case, or or the worst case scenario, will ask me to pay 50% of the ticket).
Look how the lawyers react to the traffic stop.
They are extremely polite.
There is no need to fight with the cops. You do it in court.
There is no need for any type of confrontation or arguments.
But I have friends who are speeding & arguing with the cops....
They drink & smoke in the car.
And they are telling me that they are being stopped for no reason.
Roland Fryer is just a normal guy who wants to do the right thing. His work, morals, and ethics should be praised. A man to aspire to be.
And that's precisely why they hate him. He's got the "right" identity politics but the "wrong" opinions. By which I mean a commitment to basic morality and scientific objectivity. The very best parts of Western culture. And therefore evil.
How you can possibly believe that is beyond me. Or maybe you don't know this. Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction.
Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
More importantly he's prepared to be swayed by the evidence into changing his opinion
Structural Racism is the perfect deflection for incompetent teachers.
Funny that.
He will suffer the same faith as people like Thomas Sowell.
He will be somehow known and in some way relevant and appear. But the mainstream will never acknowledge him, his ideas or will even touch his topics to bring it to their audience. He will simply be ignored as good as it can be
A university shouldn't have a narrative.
They shouldn’t, but unfortunately some do. Especially the ones we used to deem "prestigious.”
No. It should have a narrative, just an explicitly a-political one like "we are a place to educate the people and advance knowledge as rigorously and truthfully as possible. We do not have any political agenda and we bow to no one and nothing, except the truth."
Too much money is tied up in Universities for them not to have narratives. I know it sounds like I am being conspiratorial, but every university has been in hot water for one reason or another (all due to being bought and paid for). You'll probably remember the elite students who were having their grades paid for. You may know that every scientific paper (especially the university led ones) has been compromised by stat doping and outright false information to show a particular narrative. You may be aware that the information being taught at universities is stepped on heavily by corporations and politicians. It boggles my mind that we still value post secondary education at all.
"The truth" is the historical narrative they pursued.
And actually he even said in the interview; whether he proved one side or the other that he proved right, he didn't care. When you find the truth, you get the tools to fix the problem.
Actually, they should. A commitment to free speech and open discourse and independent research. That's a narrative. The problem is they have the wrong one.
This man is an actual, Social Justice Warrior in the true sense of the term, he is actually looking at justice, and not identity politics, no wonder he's hated.
"Make Academia Great Again" fits him. He just wants what's right. Not wanting to play politics or even his own credit.
He should go on Actual Justice Warrior. It would actually be a really interesting dialogue in their shared interests of crime and statistics.
He stats show minorities face more police force even when innocent than others. Then numbers show no discrimination in lethal force. Doesnt add up
A "Justice Warrior" then. "Social Justice" doesn't make any sense, practically speaking.
Eh, social justice is used to clarify
Justice warrior sounds like a batman
This guy should be the president of Harvard now. Bring the college integrity back.
They no longer can, Harvard takes in WAY too much money from DEI investments :D
The guy who literally misrepresent the findings of the study should be president? This whole comment section is proof you guys refuse to do any actual research and prefer to just engage in fallacy and a lot of appeal to authority.
his paper was written making assumptions and drawing conclusions, and coding their own data without posting the origional data.
while its not impossible that the assertion made is true, its a sketchy paper and by no means woild bring integrity if scientests began making assumptions in order to get to a conclusion.
The real truth is plenty of papers have presented evidence to the opposing argument, but the one that does is suddenly "this guy is right and knows all". its confirming what you already believe so its much easier to accept it as truth.
theres plenty of pretty sound criticism that looks at his analysis fsctually that you can look up online.
You’re just as bad as the wokists. No black should be the president of any institution. They’re not qualified.
Omg yes, I'll vote for that🗳
Love this guy. Love the fact he refuses to lie.
Standing on principle is admirable 🇺🇸
@@MyPronounIsGoddess he had the facts.. choosing to publish them shows he’s principled.
I used English correctly here and know what I meant 👍 lol
🗿🗿🗿
the fact that a harvard professor didn't account for differential crime rates in his analysis should raise eyebrows... oh but keep clapping like a pack of trained seals.
And yet most people, most of the time, vote for the person who lies hardest, promote the people who lie most, and buy the newspapers who tell the biggest lies.
As a retired cop I thank him for his honesty and the bravery it took to come out and explain it.
On the question of racial bias for routine stops where there is reported compliance... Could it be that there is a fear built from the experience since 50% of violent crime is committed by blacks who are only 13% of the population? I am assuming that the vast majority of that black violent crime is happening in the inner cities? Is this racial bias mainly happening in the inner cities?? My guess is a learned jadedness... For example, if you go to a store that frequently mis-prices their products, and you keep catching it at the register, you are far more likely to double check their prices, even if a good number of the prices are entered correctly. If so, how can we help police to not have that knee-jerk reaction??
As I've heard him what he said is that police are not racists, they're just undertrained, overarmed cowards with "us vs. them mentality" and shoot and brutalize everyone equally.
People hyper focus on the negative that being said there does need to be reform in the police namely in the self-policing department since we often see cops commit felonies and not be charged because the DA doesn’t want to hurt their relationship. Their department chooses to back them up instead of applying the law and cops use more force than required, in what I can only assume is an attempt to gain control in a situation which in many cases they have no right to use the force and are not charged for the subsequent assault and battery they commited
It is easy to say the cops should be unbiased, but when you know so many people are armed and you are stopping them for violating the law, one has to maintain a sense of self preservation.
As a community resident / homeowner who benefits from police protection daily I humbly thank you for your service.
My PhD was on the US South. Before I submitted, both of my supervisors advised me that if I left in the fact that there was parity between blacks and whites when discussing poverty, 'other Universities will not want me in the future'. I stated that it was 100% provable and all the stats since the 1870s prove it. They replied, that it doesn't matter, it's not the narrative universities want or supply funding for. I walked away from academia as soon as I got my Doctorate; with the stats left in. It's all a depressing rip off, money-making business. I would add that making black folk feel they're still oppressed is big business for select white groups; including universities.
Good man. If academia refuses to hold truth of information as the highest standard, then they don't deserve you. Truth, ESPECIALLY when it's ugly, is more important than ANY narrative
I'm guessing the same people who think they can't get an ID and do not know what the word "computer" means. The infantilization bothers me, and I'm only seeing it from the outside.
Where is the money in this "business"?
@@jshyoungblood You're are aware of how universities work I take it? Garnering to the current zeitgeist. Procuring funding through organisations that make money from such issues. Making it fashionable to potential students and their paying parents. Promoting issues which strengthen their stance on a subject. Only employing those willing to get on board. Do I need to go on? It goes as deep as you can look.
@@jshyoungbloodI’m guessing the money is in funding for grants, endowing professorships, and donations.
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.” - Plato
Like Jesus Christ
Since when is fallacy, truth?
Roland Fryer is the ideal man to become the President of Harvard!
It should be a requirement for all our Professors to be like this man.
The system used to select for people with critical thinking and objectivity.
Now it selects for conformity and the ability to doublethink.
In what way should a professor be like this man
In what way should a professor be like this man
In areas like Atlanta or Detroit, the majority of inner city officers are black.
So, black police are bigoted against black community?
@@Woodland-Gangstanot being a filthy communist for starters
A Harvard Professor with integrity. Bravo!
The first since Professor Alan Dershowitz.
And he was suspended for it.
The bias he uncovered is in direct proportion to the self inflicted bad reputation of black culture. Thug life is real. The bad reputation will not be going anywhere anytime soon. The part that is unfortunate is when black individuals with good reputations are wrongly profiled as a thug. The bias is real because the bad reputations are real. Let’s recognize the bigger picture so we can put context on the bias.
Roland had a Floridian slip at 11:58 when he began to say ‘why’ things are happening then quickly changed his word to ‘what’ was happening.
I don’t think he is capable of exposing ‘why’
It should also be noted many thugs, bad elements, bad people have learned to be chameleons. When pulled over on a traffic stop a thug may appear a great citizen then whip out a gun and start shooting or reach for the officer’s gun all in the blink of an eye.
He points out what is happening but is unable to say why.
I “ can “ tell you why.
It doesn’t take a professor.
The reputation of the black community is deeply stained and will remain that way.
People refer to it as systemic racism but the truth is bad reputation manifests into perceived racism and it is the primary contributor to racial profiling.
Everyone is entitled to their discernment.
Not all liberals are brain-dead. It's why I'm no longer liberal for the most part.
Valuing truth above social acceptance, and facing the consequences that come with that, in my book, is the definition of moral courage. Well done this man.
“Why don’t academics care enough about pursuing the truth?”
I think history shows that people would rather be popular than right.
The whole point of academia is to pursue the truth and bow to nothing else. The rest is just people doing bad stuff like fake status grabbing, prejudice or cowardice.
He started by talking about the backlash he faced by doing so, death threats included, so he should know better than most why people are afraid to tell the truth.
People would rather be paid than be right, funding drives research.
@@mattp7828 That's an oversimplification that glosses over the core issue - capitalism. When it's no longer about whether the result is scientifically significant, but whether the result has economic benefit for someone. If not, there's no funding. It used to be simply quality research could get funding. Not anymore.
in this case, paid well as a university race baiter getting bums on seats
A true social scientist and earnest scholar, this man is far too good for Harvard.
Yes!
its easily corrupted by ideology, social aciences
He's disingenuous.
@@stevennowachek2657 What do you mean?
@@Azraelcruz23 I mean if he just now figured out social science was biased and ideologically skewed he's stupid or lying
Prof. Roland Fryer: "I would do it again." ... a man of integrity.
He's passionate, smart, and sincere about helping people. Top man!
If he is so sincere about helping people, how did he manage to leave this out? Nixon's War On Blacks (Lawfare) is driving Blacks to Trump. A Black Trump supporter at the May 23, 2024 Bronx rally called for an end to Systemic Racism. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack jurisdiction. Google - "Blacks Are Victims of Lawfare" Power and Control - for my take and video of the rally
And add to that, good sense of humor. His laughter is contagious.
Nothing angers emotionally unstable people more than the truth.
They would scream at you for believing in objective truth. They only believe in “their truth.” There is no reality in the humanities, and they are trying to push their post modernist BS on everyone else. It is the Rich White Lady gang, and they will cancel you.
Or religious people for that matter.
@Naraku1987 it's rather unfortunate you felt the need to drag religion into a conversation that has nothing to do with religion.
Tell MAGA that
@michaelgarrett2266 everyone is just deflecting. This is amazing.
Wow - blown away by Roland. Extremely intelligent and steadfast. We're so lucky to have people like this that can help us see through the fog of hysteria.
ruclips.net/user/shortsBmc9NFfhx74?si=ecQtDCRUiWdQRBkw
It's very telling that the response to Roland's work from BLM wasn't:
"Thank god we were very concerned about police fatalities, this is fantastic news"
They were busy cashing checks and buying homes and cars
That would remove the justification for their grift.
His results don't buy mansions
I mean he did find bias in non lethal use of force. That's also important. Still something to work on
@@brennangum6236 Absolutely! I think the problem with this issue and many other is people want an excuse to be angry or something to blame for why they're not where they want to be, not actually work on the issue. But for those who actually care, the first step in solving a problem is correctly identifying the problem and that's what Roland has done and why it's so valuable, if BLM are serious they should have taken this Data seriously and they didn't which is really disappointing.
Roland Fryer needs to be protected at all costs - He very well could be the next generations Thomas Sowell. That is compliment to Roland Fryer, Thomas Sowell is a global treasure.
Haha, we literally had the same thought. My words were a little different in my post, but my goodness I finish typing and look at the next few comments and bam there you are. You sir clearly have the capacity to see the big picture. Hurrah for you. Those of us with the eyes to see it, we must play our role, it's our obligation and our duty to those who can only see the details.
Being called all the pejoratives is a right of passage for any honest, black intellectual in this country. I'm sure he's heard them all before and has received threats, as well. Let's hope we get to see more of him and where his career leads.
Along with Colman Hughes
@@mst5g826 The Left once again showing us that they are not tolerant, inclusive, nor do they care for minorities.
Fryer should remain in academia and resist associating with think tanks with guiding political ideologies which would compromise the integrity of his research and other work.
We're failing as a society. We're teaching kids that feelings are more important than actual facts.
Yet Fryer refuses to acknowledge SEVERAL other economic research studies(published in top economic journals such as his study was) that came out both before and after his study that find OPPOSITE results. ONE study doesn't constitute a consensus and Fryer KNOWS THATS THE CASE. He is far from an idiot. An Example Study: "Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls" by Mark Hoekstra
Those that want to be fooled will be fooled. Those that don’t know the truth/facts.
I don't think this is new. The other side of the coin is blind patriotism.
Direct result of diminished education in this country. Education must be our national first prioriety instead of interest in foreign policies that are wasteing our future for our children. Investing in educating is a must
It's not just kids. Look how Fox uses anecdotal images and plays them hundreds of times to insinuate crime is rising. Sometimes even the stuff they show lacks context
I LOVE LOVE LOVE Roland Fryer. His life story, if nothing else, should act as an inspiration for anyone, no matter their race.
I hope you mean except the unprofessional conduct for which he was suspended for two years.
@@AH-te5gs Cooked up by the hostile Claudine Gay.
@@AH-te5gs Any real evidence of him sexually harassing his colleagues? No? Didn't think so. Y'all are so quick to immediately disbelieve a minority when his facts don't align with your feelings.
Roland Fryer! Spectacular guest, so sincere and thoughtful.
Roland Fryer is integrity personified.
Edit: He’s on the same track as Thomas Sowell, who, in my opinion, is a national treasure.
The truth clearly hurts. Thanks for making this available, team, and thanks Roland for providing such valuable insight and research.
Depends on what truth you mean. When the naive child stated that the emperor was naked, was the emperor hurt because he was naked or hurt because he had been tricked?
There's a difference. Only perverts enjoy being humiliated.
Yet Fryer refuses to acknowledge SEVERAL other economic research studies(published in top economic journals such as his study was) that came out both before and after his study that find OPPOSITE results. ONE study doesn't constitute a consensus and Fryer KNOWS THATS THE CASE. He is far from an idiot. An Example Study: "Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls" by Mark Hoekstra
History has shown us the most hated man in any room shall ALWAYS be the man who dares speak the truth
Always?
Hitler
@@bettermetal8306Always.
@Blade.5786 my drunk uncles disproves that.
So, there is a room with FDR, lincoln, and hitler arguing over if the final solution was morally correct. Does that saying still hold true?
What about a room full of trump supporters and biden. Does that mean what biden says is true?
Lets go with the opposite, room full of liberals and trump, does that mean trump speaks the truth?
What about a room with ghandi, MLK and jeffrey dahmer arguing over the ethics of eating people.
The truth shall set you free.
I’m often saddened by things I see people do. It’s quite refreshing to see a smart and honest man do the work and stand up.
Thank you Prof. Fryer for being intellectually honest and having integrity.
Brilliant interview. Listening to Prof. Fryer is a delight.
I could listen to this guy all day. Hes kind, patient, intuitive, steady, and has such a pleasant way of putting things.
Research facts and THEN draw conclusions, this man is integrity personified
It helps to research the CORRECT facts instead of fallacious facts that support a propaganda narrative.
How refreshing to see a guy who is committed to the truth no matter where it leads, and who is willing to revise his views given the data.
Without being able to seek, see and speak the truth, we are doomed. Great attitude Mr. Fryer!
The world needs more social scientists like Roland Fryer, who use data and evidence to draw accurate conclusions about what is happening. To have proved his own preconception on this subject to be incorrect and to be willing to talk about it openly is admirable.
He's still in denial about certain aspects of the demographic/crime situation. You wonder why the police are more likely to use force on certain groups? Well, that's very simple. The brain is a pattern recognizer and cops (like all humans) have a natural instinct to protect themselves from threats. It's impossible to turn your brain off and ignore patterns you're aware of when they're linked to your survival and safety. It's lizard brain stuff. When they ask cops to not profile, they're literally asking them to turn off one of the most basic instincts they have. The cops know that certain groups are overwhelmingly more likely to resist arrest, assault them, commit violent crime, etc. and so OF COURSE they are going to be more likely to use force against them. Mind you, a use of force can be something as simple as handcuffing a detained suspect because they're nervous that the suspect might try to flee or attack them, and I guarantee that is the VAST majority of the instances Fryer counted as a "use of force incident." So, what he's calling "racial bias" is more than likely just the cops using their basic instincts, training and experience to more effectively do their job. The only way to remove this knowledge aforethought in the minds of the police is if the PATTERNS STOP AND THE DATA CHANGES i.e. certain groups STOP COMMITTING OVERWHELMINGLY HIGHER LEVELS OF CRIME, INCLUDING RESISTING ARREST, FLEEING, ETC.
His paper was criticized because of selection bias. Also keep in mind George Floyd wasnt shot, but strangled by a knee.
@@interventor3507he was neither.
@@interventor3507criticism doesn't counter the findings there chum
Yes it does, faulty data collection, sketchy paper.
Thank you Mr Dryer for your desire for truth and change regardless where it leads...
The greatest form of self enlightenment is discovering that your most sacred beliefs could be/are wrong.
When our own conclusions become suspect we can begin to find the flaws in our understanding. The single most important information I've ever learned.
Hopefully he will realize that when it comes to education. Somehow the 0.5 bln Bill Gates Foundation experiment failed miserably at improving the educational outcomes, and they've tried everything under the sun.
@squibbelsmcjohnson It's like my dad said, sometimes, it's better to be wrong than right.
@squibbelsmcjohnson Same here! Especially after the past four years. Who wants to believe a one world government is inbound, or digital slavery, 15-minute cities, cashless society, Great Reset, etc? I'm even a flat earther. My social life was so much better when I believed whatever the majority of scientists believed lol. Imagine being the only flat earther at a dinner party.
This goes so hard
What a pleasant breath of fresh air this man is. This is what an academic should be, focused on truth seeking regardless of where it leads you, willing to stand behind his findings even if it's unpopular.
❤❤❤
What would you have said if he'd said that US police were as brutal & biased as most believe?
@@wonderings8973 If he could back it by solid research findings, it would be a whole lot less pleasant because what it says about American society as a whole. But I would still commend him for doing good research.
Of course, those were the results he was expecting to find and the the results that his fellow academics wanted him to find. So it would have been less interesting in terms of following the data despite it being unpopular as it would have simply affirmed the popular narrative.
@@siggyincr7447
I think you'll find that many of the people praising him would NOT be supportive of research that didn't reaffirm what they already believed.
I've seen far too much of that over the years
@@wonderings8973 Sure, confirmation bias is the norm for human beings.
While his findings aren't surprising to me, that's not why I hold him in such high regard. He went ahead and published despite warnings that it could be bad for his career. This is what we need more of.
I remember reading about a study done by a couple of statistics experts who collected a whole lot of data about police doing traffic stops in a region where accusations of racial profiling were rife.
They actually set out to prove the police were racist.
The results showed the police did in fact pull black people over more often, but they found they also pulled black people over more often at night when they couldnt possibly have known the race of the driver.
The data showed the bias was caused by black people breaking traffic laws more often and attracting more attention to themselves.
So the narrative about racist police was driven by emotion and not data. That is a huge issue because if you dont want to be accurate about the nature of the problem you will never get an accurate solution that works.
An officer has discretion to issue a ticket. Driving is not discussed in the Constitution. In fact, most police departments didn't exist before the Civil War. White drivers break the laws to, but an officer is more likely to give a white person a warning. Go do the research on that.
"Stop and Frisk" in NYC - Black (60 percent). Latinx (27 percent). were white (8 percent). Asian / Pacific Islander (2 percent).
(2021) Police found a weapon in about one out of six pedestrian stops last year and found a firearm in about one out of 13 stops
Justice Department found Ferguson police officers routinely violate the Fourth Amendment in stopping people without reasonable suspicion, arresting them without probable cause, and using unreasonable force against them.Mar 4, 2015
Ferguson Missouri is 71% black
I read the same study. You can only have good discussions with people when you pull the emotions out and gather all the data. Good reminder, thank you.
@@christopherbyrd4808 how could anyone know if they have gathered all the data or only part of the data?
@@bigdaddy3621 you don't all data to create a reasonable picture. You need a reasonably sized random set of data. You almost never have ALL the data.
At 44m. Larry is an intense and compelling man. I had the opportunity to go to Harvard. But when Larry was fired for simply asking research questions, I declined. Thanks, Roland, for sharing that story. And today, you and he are colleagues! A happy ending that’s yet another beginning.
Roland Fryer should be added to Trigonometry as one of your interviewers. He is an incredibly intelligent and well spoken individual. I love how he can challenge a thought with the sincere desire to understand a different perspective. Well done sir!
Thank you Dr. Fryer for your integrity. Thank you.
There are people who don't want to solve the problems because the conflicts benefit them or their cause.
$$$$$$$$ and power/control
The most incredible thing about your statement is that Democrats read this and they have Republicans top of mind with examples when they say "You are right."
Republicans have Democrats top of mind with examples when they say "You are right."
And they are both right. A poor republican and a poor democrat have more in common with each other than either of them have with the rich in their own party.
Problem is increase police force for innocent based on race. His numbers backed public thought. But somehow fatal is different than reg day
Ronald Fryer is an exceptional scientist, incredibly interesting personality and the most courageous man.
Hes not the first. All the statistics have been known for years, even other black academics like Glenn Loury have said it. There is an epidemic of homicides, gangs and violence in the AA community that has been going on for decades, and we know around 75% of those crimes are never solved by police. We know if a blk person is harmed in the US, 99% of the time the perp is another blk person. We know a white person is many times more likely to be harmed by a blk person than the other way around. We know homicide is the leading cause of death for AA's and AA's is the only race where homicide or violence is the leading cause of death. All the stats are very clear but the left and the media say the opposite is true in some misguided attempt to help or protect them. This is how we got to a point where people can call for genocide in the streets and face no repercussions and stores are closing across the country from mob robberies and theres a total breakdown of law and order,
I've seen Roand Fryer in other interviews online and I commend him for his bravery and his pursuit of the truth. We all need more people like him.
Guys like Roland help restore my faith in humanity.
This is an exceptional man.
Yes. But this is an unfortunate fact. All academics should be like him.
As a conservative I would love parts of the paper to be false, but the facts are the facts and you can't hide from that. Now it's time to research the details.
So nice to hear 3 intelligent men having an important interview/conversation. They verbalize every point in my head (and more articulately).
This is a real man.
By that you mean a disingenuous piece of s*** who came to the truth 10 years too late
Why ? A ninja that isn’t following a set narrative on the race card ?
@@Aussie100-hj2jm It's like a lot of things. You get it or you dont.
@@dsamh I’m just saying why is every one jumping up and down for him actually doing his job
He says he wanted the opposite outcome so as people would like him .Honest.
But everyone is acting like he’s exceptional because he isn’t being a typical ninja ?
Right ?
Omg look the ninja isn’t being a ninja
WOW WHAT A REAL MAN 😂😂😂🤷
@@Aussie100-hj2jmCuz so many in his position DON'T do their job. They adjust their research and findings to fit certain narratives and ideologies
Why is that people like Roland aren’t in public office?!? I’ve always assumed that it’s because they’re too intelligent.
To be in office one must be corrupt and also a Freemason. Roland should stay far away from politicians.
Yes. They seek truth over political leverage.
"I refuse to lie."
Not necessarily "too intelligent", more like "too honest."
Too much intelligence. Too much integrity.
It's so refreshing to hear someone say, I don't know. This was a proper good faith conversation. Could have listened for hours. This is what academia should be about. The pursuit of truth.
Thank you for being so brave.
Courage is the rarest - yet most essential - of virtues. YES, Prof Freyer.
Very brave man in today's climate. Trying to use facts to make things better. Keep on keeping on sir and God bless your efforts!
Fucking love this man. He's a fantastic example for anyone who is curious and wants to pursue truth in any given situation.
An honest, brave, learned man in search of and speaking to the actual truth as he finds it.
Despite the threats.
That’s a genuine, admirable man.
If anybody, choose Roland Fryer as a black president for Harvard University. He values truth and facts.
Roland Fryer. The real deal. *Loved* this conversation, packed full of gems. His words about a *North Star* were both inspiring and poignant. Terribly Frustrating that we (Americans) can't seem to get this right.
Wish the media would have allowed this discussion 4 years ago. Better late than never.
MSM will never showcase his studies. It doesn’t fit their racist grifting narrative.
The msm still wouldn't allow this conversation
It was a joke that it was exported out of the US in 2020
@@grannyannie2948 Completely pathetic, the same as we had protests in Australia after the overturning of Roe v Wade.
And as a result they expanded legal abortion in Australia from 20weeks to 25weeks which is just sick.
@@aidananstey9848 Yes I remember seeing videos from Sydney. I personally like Tasmania's approach. It's legal, but no doctor is willing to do one, regardless of weeks.
I remember listening to the NSW parliament debating the issue. Feminists argueing for it to be raised for gender selection for people of cultures who don't want girls. It made my head spin. I think most Australians view this issue differently to Americans.
Its sad that we need black Professors explaining this.
Dr. Fryer exemplifies what every professor ought to be. Dude’s a legend
Thank you to Dr. Fryer for his good work and willingness to change opinion. My father was a dedicated cop for 18 years and always said to look at the statistics.
Roland Fryer seems like an absolutely standup honourable man. Props to him for everything he did!
The world is brighter when someone decides to tell the truth.
Finally 👍🏽 Mr. Freyer
Big respect for this scholar! The truth matters!
I am so SO happy to see Roland Fryer out and about. I remember when he first brought his research to light and it was a hopeful time. Now is really the time. The unreasonable voices had to massively fail in order to clear the stage for Dr. Fryer
Great interview. I've heard about Roland Fryer and his study and am impressed. Intelligence, integrity & humor.
Thank you so much Dr. Fryer. Genius accomplishes very little without courage. You are a real hero.
A really great man. He acts on facts against his own beliefs.
A scientist has to have extreme curiosity and at the same time the detachment of a good jurist who weighs evidence regardless of where the conclusions lead. A remarkably small number of scientists are actually like that (I've met QUITE a few). And yes.. I've uniformly found people like this to be great men.
@@rbarnes4076 Exactly.
@@rbarnes4076 That became clear to me during C-19. Even the hard sciences are corrupt and stacked with knowledge gatekeepers in positions of power. Grant money applications will be denied if for example a scientist wants to undermine something such as germ theory. There's nothing scientific about declaring that the science is settled. More like soyence.
Thank you for your honesty. Don’t ever change. You have authentic integrity, and that is the most valuable human trait that can be attained. You’re a very good man.
This gentleman is a superb communicator of sound thinking and being honest with presenting facts. And being real.
Dr. Fryer, you are very inspiring! The world needs more leaders and professors like you. I LOVED this episode. Thank you, guys.
Roland Fryer is in everyway what every academic should be. Kudos to this man.
Roland Fryer's answers to serious questions were just stunning, calm, thorough and brilliant. What a breath of fresh air.
Something I hear in professional investigations around disasters from meltdowns to plane crashes is, “Investigate with the intent to understand, not to get someone fired.” It’s a beautiful way to describe the need to understand what really happened to assure the necessary changes are made to assure something changes.
Let me state the obvious: We need more Roland Fryers in the world, especially the academic world.
Just a reasonable, wise, and admirable intellectual. I wish all professors thought like this man. Im probably not alone in this but I would love to have a beer with him.
Here in Denmark arabs and blacks has very bad attitude etc.
Not people from Far East etc
Same pattern in all of Europe.
Worse in Sweden....50 no go zones. Police have to come with weapons and many.
That’s your fault, supporting “free Palestine” and lose your own country until it becomes Palestine itself… you have only yourself to blame.
@@ye4864How do you know this person has an opinion on a foreign war?
@@delphoeneevenhuis5199 it came out wrong; by “you” I meant Swedes and Danes in general
Two tier policing discriminates against whites
It's religious jihad. Be on guard and go back to your churches . Secularism is failing in Europe.
Excellent interview! Bravo to Dr. Fryer for holding the line on rigorous academics.
He's amazing. And one of the few professors who would deserve the high price for his class.
I really enjoy hearing him speak
This’ll be awesome! Roland is a top TOP man!
Most people believe they seek truth, but most really just want to stay within the sanctions of their tribe.
I think that is most definitely true. My experience has taught me the same.
Most people are weak and shirk from the slightest bit of pain and discomfort, be that physical or mental, such as the case with cognitive dissonance.
Simply put 🤷🏾
@@TheForbidden_1ne Now I want a glass of Simply Orange.
Roland Fryer is a real hero. I have great respect for him taking that backlash, staying with stating, and debating the truth.
So refreshing. Yes, this is what academia was, and should be. "injecting truth into the discussion".
Absolute joy listening to this man! 👏🏽 the Truth always resonates ❤ thank you Roland, Francis and Konstantin
Shine a light....truth is evident....It cannot become an untruth.
And truth will set you free
Work will set you free.
Leftwingers never got that memo.
"It's easier to fool people than convince them they've been fooled."
We are seeing this time and time again in all areas of society. The best thing that ever happened to me was getting rid of my TV 15 years ago. It's amazing how your views change and life improves when you don't listen to propaganda.
@squibbelsmcjohnson Agree, but because I got rid of my TV so long ago, and have been watching social media since the beginning, long before it was censored, I'm in that fortunate position to find it easier to spot lies from truth and able to choose what I watch and who I listen to.
The easiest way to control a population is create a religion.
L ron Hubbard, founder of scientology
2005 was when I stopped. The line of work I was in at the time made watching tell-a-vision an inconvenience. After a few years I began noticing the effects of cessation. It's impossible to go back. The internet even changed too. 20 years ago the web was like the wild West. Now it's a corporate and dot gov nightmare. Even the alternative search engines such as DuckDuckGo and Brave have been altered. Thankfully I figured out how to effectively search for information to combat algorithms. Even so it's still much harder to get the same info that was available ten years ago. Back then if a person scrolled down a page or two, they were in the deep web. Now I can scroll all day and never be shown the correct information. I searched for the truth about black on white violent crime rates, and most of the results were about Dylan Roof. The algorithm is trying to scare people into not investigating by making the reader believe that if they read crime rate stats, they will become just like Roof lol!
Thomas Sowell has had these numbers for decades. This guy just reinvented the wheel. Harvard and Stanford need to have a phone call.
A real professor? An actual intelligent professor.
Roland Fryer: “I’m going to find something about this and people are going to like me!” 😂 I like that he went in looking for the truth, and stayed with it rather than bending to political will.
Or his own historical biased narrative so prevalent in his community by race
His actual rational was: “ I can help by providing proof through data” and reality was a lot more complex and less convenient for the entire culture.
The last part was totally unexpected. Wonderful guest. Hope he stays the way he is.
Please try to invite him again
Nex gen Thomas Sowell. Hope he stays around and lives as good of a life as Dr. Sowell
I would only imagine that there’s a bunch of differences between Mr. Roland Fryer and his co-academics, but one of the things that stands out the most is Integrity. He’s shown himself to be a true scientist but with a great deal of integrity. And in a world where so many do not even understand that value, let alone demonstrate it.... He stands out as the shining star he is. Thank you Sir for not folding to the pressure.
Most people are absolute cowards. Personally and professionally. The 2020 Summer of Love is the most glaring example in recent memory.
Great, stimulating discussion. I read his research on police bias a few years ago and it’s nice to see Professor Fryer lay it out in person!
Good to remember Fryer's study published in 2017. I'd bet that, since then, overall police interactions with blacks have become less aggressive whilst blacks have gotten more entitled and aggressive with police.
And each other because of zero consequences.
Awesome
It would be great to repeat the study
I think you are right. I have watched a number of police body cam videos on RUclips which support your thesis
@@pointermom7641did you listen to the podcast? Small anecdotal evidence doesn’t count for much.
I admire Dr. Fryer's honestiy and integrity.
Really appreciate the intellectual honesty and courage of your guest.