I have to say thoug, i dont think blur and oasis really hate eachother, i think it was just an act pushed by their labels to sell more records and see who could beat the other one.
@@1dorznot really, it mainly just children who think they were born in the 90s just cause they once listened to wonderwall and act like they’re proper hard from Manchester. Realistically, most people know 1 or 2 songs and think they need to go to the concert.
@@NoobMaster6988 by that rationale no one can be into a band if they weren't around at the time. Oasis were huge, and they're still huge. As I said, recent events prove that
Meanwhile in the middle of the Britpop explosion you had Radiohead making a masterpiece called The Bends in 1995 who became the best British band from then on.
@@MarcoGosatti43 No, definitely not, the classically over depressed rich college boy music was not as good as Oasis or Blur lol. Especially considering no album, yes not even Ok Computer, reached the level of success and consistency that What's The Story Morning Glory reached, and that's a fact, the numbers back it up. What did Radiohead ever "revolutionise", they didn't introduce depressing music, or are we forgetting about Nirvana earlier on in the 90's? They just brought back depressing music in a more futuristic way, which was ironically what Blur and Oasis were making fun of, was the at times overly depressing music (I love Nirvana) that could be heard during the rise of grunge
@@liamgallagher9803 xd I am guessing you are a oasis fan since your name and pfp is oasis-related. You being a groupie doesn't make facts untrue, fanboy.
Oasis only boomed cause they were a beatles rip off, which was pretty popular at the time. Blur on the other hand explored different genres and also weren't that full of themselves. I love both bands, but blur wins.
@@zulemacardoso1626 Except that isn't true, because Oasis stayed consistently the same from the start to the end of their career, their style ironically doesn't change much, it's the same format of Noel singing like 80% of the songs and Liam singing like 80% of the songs, in their own tones. This is the basic excuse for "Oasis found much more success and weren't one hit wonders", which some people refuse to accept for Blur, who got demolished in the long run, but I still like Blur as well, it's just the facts.
They left out the part where Liam came back a year later or so for some other awards and agreed to fight Robbie, who was among the guests there. Robbie said something like 'I'll just keep my mouth shut'. Liam isn't really some hard case, it's all bravado, but there's no chance he's scared of him!
@@ex3221 The Spice Girls v Oasis were a fake industry beef. Rumors persisted about Liam and Mel C being friends with benefits for years. Beneath the butchy tracksuits and football jersey's, Mel C was fit as fk. Don't blame Liam at all.
Me encanta oasis pero eso no les quita lo arrogantes que eran 😏, parecía que les hacían un favor al recoger los premios, cero humildad, pero creo que nos acostumbramos a verlos así, los hermanos gallagher eran sinónimo de soberbia, aunque eso no les quitaba que hacían buena música 👍
Oasis won this Battle, but Blur won the war. Twenty-five years later, Blur's discography remains great, and they are mostly known for their music legacy; while Oasis' can only be really proud of their first two albums, and are better known for fights and insults. I keep loving all those times, and call myself a fan both of Oasis and Blur, but the truth is the truth. Oasis ganó esta batalla, pero Blur ganó la guerra. veinticinco años después, la discografía de Blur sigue siendo genial, y son conocidos sobre todo por su legado musical; Oasis sólo puede presumir realmente de sus dos primeros discos, y son conocidos más que nada por peleas e insultos. Sigo amando aquellos años, y me sigo declarando fan tanto de Oasis como de Blur, pero la verdad es la verdad.
Russia Is Number 1 How did Oasis win the war? In terms of popularity? Sure, but even Justin Bieber and Taylor Swift are popular, doesn’t mean their music is good. Oasis’ post-Morning Glory discography is relatively mediocre. Not a single good album. Whereas Blur proved everyone that their Britpop success was not just a fluke, evolving into true artists, releasing one good album after the other, never sounding the same, and always receiving the highest praise from both critics and fans. Albarn even outdid himself later on with Gorillaz. Whereas Coxon is still regarded as one of the best and most creative guitarists in the world nowadays. I really like Oasis, they have some great songs, but Blur are on a completely different level.
@@pringlescan1914 Do You really need the insult to defend your ideas. Pity for this. Maybe in England, or Russia, people's got this crystal clear. I don't think so. My feedback is Oasis made it greater on fame, but Blur did it on music. They are still respected artists. Oasis... well, the Gallagher Bross, are still recording good albums on their own, but not so good selling, and definitely outside the main stream. Are They respected as artist? I think not much. Always repeating themselves. And Noel being assailed by funny informal accusations of plagiarism. If not for their fans, they would be completely out of music media, while Damon Albarn had the balls to create something really new and exciting, sell millions, and keep critics mostly on his side. If Oasis come back someday, there would be great spectation, but not for their music. Bets would be on how many fights, or how much time until they asshamingly split again. And still I'd love it to happen, of course, because as I said before, I'm a fan.
José Francisco Solís Yes you spoon, and to start oasis and blur Brit pop and it was the battle of Brit pop not the battle of Spain or where ever the f*ck you’re from and in England Oasis are the clear winners. I’ll admit it blur have a few good songs but it’s only a few where as oasis first 3 albums almost Everysong is an instant classic even the b sides are. Oasis first 3 albums have the biggest cultural impact on British music since the Beatles and that’s a fact. It is true at first blur did sell more albums but that was at the beginning in the 90s oasis have overwhelmingly surpassed blur now. And I ain’t here comparing there other caress after there bands you numpty I’m talking about oasis and blur. There are many RUclips videos on who won Brit pop and every video says Oasis so do your research and I know what I am talking about since I am from England ask any teenager or kid what do You think about blur , they will go who ? But ask them oasis they’ll go they’re amAzing class , there music has and will stand the testimony of time whereas blur has two popular British songs that have stayed park life and song 2
If you are talking specifically about Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory I cannot disagree, but when talking about the balance of an entire career including the members' solo or side projects, Blur ends up doing better.
@@murilosouza4369 But that makes zero sense, because we're clearly factoring how well each BAND does against each other, not what the individuals did beforehand, during or after the rock bands duration lmao. Bringing in irrelevant factors like Gorillaz just shows a hilarious level of cope, because that isn't Blur, that's Gorillaz, different band and not involved BETWEEN the discussion of Oasis vs Blur as BANDS, not individuals. When you compare and argue whose better between Nirvana and Pearl Jam, I don't go and say "well Nirvana are better anyway because Dave Grohl went and made Foo Fighters", it's a completely different topic that brings in an external factor. Gorillaz dictated the success of Damon, not the band of Blur. Oasis did significantly better, and whilst I also like Blur it's just the facts
@@hughsmith7489 But I'm not conditioning my analysis solely based on the members' solo careers and side projects, I've included the bands' discography themselves. Oasis may even have two masterpieces (Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory), but there are other albums that despite having high points, are merely ok. Meanwhile, Blur, despite having only one great work (Parklife), still has a discography which is very cohesive, has practically no bad material and ends up lasting longer. Solo careers and side projects are just the icing on the cake in this comparison.
@@sonicyouth7177 That joke would make sense if Oasis weren't the extremely influential and much more popular and successful band, with multiple songs (not just one) to actually solidify their fame. Their main song is actually known by its name, not as the "woo hoo" song
Their songs are very well crafted in my opinion. Graham uses the guitar in various types of creative ways and Alex inputs a lot of cool bass lines. Blur is the best band of the Blur category.
What makes someone great in the field of arts? I guess people really overrate a lot of stuff, but sometimes for the wrong reasons. It becomes more like a plastic discussion, sometimes nonsense, like some "apples are better than oranges" kind of debate. I think that Blur deserves their credit, their albums from 1993-1999 are full of great moments and creative music representation. Very original stuff. I guess the popularity brings some sort of distorted way of digesting art, mainly music. I used to listen The Auteurs, Pulp, Kula Shaker, Teenage Fanclub, and a lot, lot more of british things. My dad sometimes imported CD's for me. I'm from Brazil, and even though I've studied and respectfully and openly listened to lots of britpop era material, At least I was free of a pre-conceived notion of some bands, except knowing that some of them were popular in mid 90's. I remember listening to every second of Blur's 13 album in my Walkman under my blanket when I was a child and it was very special to me, it was just music, creative music. It wasn't overrated lads that girls screams to cause they're "beautiful" and put posters on the bedroom in a poser-way, y'know? It was just absorption of art, and cool sounds. Oasis is great, kind of a more direct Gibson-driven modern rock n' roll, which is something that I find very unique too, even when minimalistic, still it's Oasis, still it's very recognizable. Noel Gallagher usually play distorted full chords, while Graham usually creates some specific guitar inputs for the song. For example, observe the guitar line of "Charmless Man" by Blur and "Roll With It", by Oasis. When I was a teenager I didn't get why people were so fond of Oasis, I thought that were a lot of others complex bands to pay attention to, but now, at 24 yrs old, I see that this type of argument is bullshit. I have my small collection of Oasis albums, and I truly like and respect the music. About the Beatles, for me it's impossible to imagine that you are living in 1967, buying and listening to Sgt. Peppers, Revolver, White Album or any of these post 1965 albuns for the first time and not thinking that it was lots of groundbreaking, emotional, sometimes raw, sometimes aggressive and beautiful music in these albums. There's nothing like The Beatles. I guess some people hate it because it's to much "popular" even though those critics normally don't have knowledge of half of the Beatles catalog. Some people hate it because they have a preconception that the band only talk about love. Some people hate it cause they don't see what is special about songs that don't sound like Ariana Grande. I guess that in order to absorve music and music concepts, you first have to be open to it. I've first listened to The Doors when I was a child, but just when I was a teenager I really understand what was special about that tapestry of minimalistic blend of instruments together. Hammond Organs playing bass-parts, very creative guitar lines, and great compositions. Before that it was just a 'okay' band to me. By the way, thanks for the polite replies, sorry for my shitty english and pardon for the long text.
Suede are truly one of the great British bands at this point. Their first three records (and the B-side compilation 'Sci-Fi Lullabies') are seminal Britpop, and they have had a whole brilliant second act to their career since reforming in 2010. Meanwhile Oasis members are still arsing around trying to repeat what they were doing 30 years ago.
Oasis genuinely represented the working class with their hardcore, straight edge demeanor and hard hitting rock songs while Blur were just mid-tier fakers making very typical, boring happy-go-lucky songs. Not even remotely comparable in my book.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
blur: kissing and hugging people
oasis: look straight talk snob
The Grammys: supportive with jokes
The Brits: Angry British people beefing with each other the whole night
Grammys are shit. Aimed at rnb, rap and black music
@@LiamArdo89 I like the Brit’s better, it’s just generally better music and people win the awards for actually being good
@@LiamArdo89 Why you being a racist shithead for lol?
@@LiamArdo89 Damn bro being fcking racist. lol Even the Brits today were hip-hop dominated too. Stfu
@@LiamArdo89 rock and roll is black music mate.
The 90s were epic. Miss that decade so much
I have to say thoug, i dont think blur and oasis really hate eachother, i think it was just an act pushed by their labels to sell more records and see who could beat the other one.
bingo, they sold like 500,000 singles each in one week or something because of it. Absolutely crazy numbers.
Yeah it seems like it
Oasis picked a fight with... well everyone
Even themselves lol
Liam would murder robbie in a ring
Kid Castle Music lol he wouldn’t. Robbie does boxing since his 20s
I doubt it
Robbie's gut can take a punch. Liam could mentally injure Robbie with swear words though.
Liam is thin and weak with no physical prowess in any way. Thats why he just stood on stage like a statue.
Voice Note King ruclips.net/video/a9PYuxO6LHU/видео.html lol look at this 😂 he has less movement than a playmobil toy
It's funny how Oasis and it's fans, always sees the band as bigger than it really is...
Ikr? They songs are of course good but also just a beatles rip off.
It fits really well.
The last few weeks prove just how big the band was, and remains
@@1dorznot really, it mainly just children who think they were born in the 90s just cause they once listened to wonderwall and act like they’re proper hard from Manchester. Realistically, most people know 1 or 2 songs and think they need to go to the concert.
@@NoobMaster6988 by that rationale no one can be into a band if they weren't around at the time. Oasis were huge, and they're still huge. As I said, recent events prove that
I love how Liam just doesn't give a shit..best way to be
Two of the best Britpop bands ever. Idc who's the winner, they're made memorable albums. Damon and Noel are amazing songwriters.
Meanwhile in the middle of the Britpop explosion you had Radiohead making a masterpiece called The Bends in 1995 who became the best British band from then on.
No
@@mariol2116 Errr yes.
@@mariol2116 con la llorona en la espalda no me imagino una opinion decente.
@@MarcoGosatti43 No, definitely not, the classically over depressed rich college boy music was not as good as Oasis or Blur lol. Especially considering no album, yes not even Ok Computer, reached the level of success and consistency that What's The Story Morning Glory reached, and that's a fact, the numbers back it up. What did Radiohead ever "revolutionise", they didn't introduce depressing music, or are we forgetting about Nirvana earlier on in the 90's? They just brought back depressing music in a more futuristic way, which was ironically what Blur and Oasis were making fun of, was the at times overly depressing music (I love Nirvana) that could be heard during the rise of grunge
@@hughsmith7489I'd rather take depressed music over generic guitar pop music. Oasis is generic asf
Nobody:
NoEl:MaRmItE
That was epic and noostalgic.
That Blur scene man!
Liam, always worth watching
Robbie Williams is what happens when nobody has punched you very hard in the face.
Brilliant 😂❤
I'm here just for 0:35 😂
Love this moment and Daimon's young chaotic energy sm. He's still like that after 30+ years, tho
Oasis was a huge thing in the 90s and their songs from that period were immaculate. But in a long run Blur and especially Damon Albarn eventually won
No way mate look at the popularities today oasis are popular with gen z and kids from the 10s blur are unheard of pretty much
@@liamgallagher9803 gorillaz are bigger than both
@@sarucanine6044 😂😂😂 deluded
@@liamgallagher9803 xd I am guessing you are a oasis fan since your name and pfp is oasis-related. You being a groupie doesn't make facts untrue, fanboy.
Looking at Gen Z, they are
Liam is a legend but I love Robbie and Damon too
Liam is a bastard
1:30 yeah some things I don’t miss from the 90s
Who cares who was the better band? I love them both! Liam wasn’t scared of Robbie tho 😂😂
everyone is beefing with everyone
90% of the ppl who say oasis are better than blur have never actually listened to them or they just know song 2 or girls and boys
Because nobody cares about blur
babushka boi well they’re missing out a lot then
I like both but I prefer Oasis :)
Oasis only boomed cause they were a beatles rip off, which was pretty popular at the time. Blur on the other hand explored different genres and also weren't that full of themselves. I love both bands, but blur wins.
There’s just not enough cocaine on display here.
All the people
So many people
And they all go hand-in-hand
Hand-in-hand through their marmite/shitelife.
- Noel and Liam Gallagher.
I fucking love Oasis so much
BLUR >
I personally listen to both blur and oasis, but blur is my favourites since I was like 5 y.o lol
me when im delusional
Sales and hits says otherwise
@@ND-OPSOasis decidió vender y le dio igual el arte,Blur siempre tuvo más en claro sus convicciones
@@zulemacardoso1626 Except that isn't true, because Oasis stayed consistently the same from the start to the end of their career, their style ironically doesn't change much, it's the same format of Noel singing like 80% of the songs and Liam singing like 80% of the songs, in their own tones. This is the basic excuse for "Oasis found much more success and weren't one hit wonders", which some people refuse to accept for Blur, who got demolished in the long run, but I still like Blur as well, it's just the facts.
Blur.
Oasis sells waaaaaaaaaaaaay more records than blur could ever dream of
@@ND-OPS selling more refords doesn't mean you're better. look at taylor swift, harry styles etc.......
They left out the part where Liam came back a year later or so for some other awards and agreed to fight Robbie, who was among the guests there. Robbie said something like 'I'll just keep my mouth shut'. Liam isn't really some hard case, it's all bravado, but there's no chance he's scared of him!
0:55 Michael Hutchence :'(
They cut out the "Has-beens shouldn't be presenting awards to gonna-be's" - Liam, pointing at Hutchence
Во были времена..🖤
AAAALLLLLL THE PEOPLEEEE😂😂
This was the uks biggie vs Tupac not quite as brutal and tragic. But still very fun lol.
Liam vs Mel C lol they were good mates and drinking buddies behind the scenes (and some suggest even a bit more).
What do you mean?
@@ex3221 The Spice Girls v Oasis were a fake industry beef. Rumors persisted about Liam and Mel C being friends with benefits for years. Beneath the butchy tracksuits and football jersey's, Mel C was fit as fk. Don't blame Liam at all.
@@deadseagull-xf3lk thanks mate.
Waittttt I never knew Bob Mortimer was on when blur won
omg ur alive!
Eddie Hearn seeing Robbie vs liam
Seriously what a stupid move by Robbie
In Robbie's defence, Liam hasn't taken him up on his offer. . .
Melissa Wright Because he’s a 50 year old father who isn’t going to fight someone who offered him out 20 years ago
He’d get his ass kicked back to stoke. Great guy, just too nice
This little fairy is kidding himself thinking he can stand a chance against Liam Gallagher lol
Liam starts fights for fun
liam is so funny i love him omg
*Damon.
I guess if you're 15 it must be funny
@@mainsmain i just want to hit idk
@@mainsmain its better to be fifteen and enjoying life rather than to be 30 and miserable like you
@amosgamaliel7968 liam is funny I'm 44 so I must ne childish then
Blur all day everyday (my opinion might be swayed by the fact that alex is a family friend)...😂
Ur deffo a posh boy then
James X Racing should be having words about that then
what the fuck youre so lucky! have you ever met him???
Nancy Dawson yeh...we first met him and his family at the pantomime in chipping norton a few years ago
did he gaves u a cheese? i'm curious
The agenda against oasis is mad. No mention of how blur moved their single, made it a war, then took the piss on top of the pops
Lmao, it wasn't Blur's decision, it was all made by their labels to push both bands' sales.
Love Blur. LOVE Oasis!
Why do I always think of Kevin and Perry, when I see Liam 😂
Robbie Williams 🤦🏻♂️. Your down with the vale
Gloriest time in music
Taylor swift is better and you know it
Robbie was defo the gay one in Take That.
1:28 Hz Healing Frequency
Get a load of the Spice Girls giving it large at Wembley Stadium!
Liam had to buy an ice cold Coke!
AHAHHA the Attitude of all these lads
OasisBlur
I love robbie hes such a nob its just funny, for real tho I'm so up for the boxing Match, see robbie just MAULED
Oasis es mi favorito musicalmente hablando, aunque también me gustan muchas canciones de blur y son mas carismáticos que los Gallagher
Blur may have won the battle but Oasis definitely won the war
Feel like people forget how many bang average albums Oasis released 😂
@nathan113 not as many as Blur 🤮
gorillaz
@@benhurley7366 ironically the Gorillaz are actually pretty good 😆🐵
@@jacobmassey3897 thats my point
All the people
So many people
And they all go hand-in-hand
Hand-in-hand through their marmite/shitelife.
- Noel and Liam Gallagher.
Oasis forever
Robbie Williams would have had Liam Gallagher any day
James 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Of course...
James would he fuck
@@liamoconnor8811 sorry Liam I know that's you but Robbie is harder than you mate
Liam scared of Robbie? 😂 nice one
You may prefer Oasis, but you have to admit that Blur were better people.
Watch the interview with Nardwuar and say that again
But they dont give awards like that nobody cates which are better people
Alejandro Molina boring southern fairies are better people?
Next joke plz :D
@@Kelvinack my thoughts exactly
Sporty spice was so sexy
nahhhh. It was:
Geri
Baby
Posh
Scary
Sporty
But as you grow older you realise that 'Scary' was the best. That rack!
Blur forever
Yeah!
In fact blur is really better than oasis and you know it
i dont like any of blurs songs to be honest, but oasis is from another world. I love OASIS
Was Robbie always that soft??? 🙄
Robbie is a manchild using his dad's money. Even the nicest dude Jimmy Page can't stand his arse lol
@@zackzallie8735 Jimmy Page walks a very fine line between "nicest dude" and "nonce"
@@AkyovNorthWest toggaf
뽀뽀발사하는 데이먼 넘 좋다
blur 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Damon Albarn has more talent in his left toe than the Oasis brothers
Someones been on the wacky backy.
Still can't sellout knebworth
🎶 MARMITE😂
script plz... what is that spicy girls says??
"Liam, come and have a go if you think you're hard enough."
What’s the song called at 0:51
cigarettes and alcohol by oasis
Liam would butcher Robbie Williams in a bare knuckle boxing match
Liam is a pretend hard man
Oasis. One of the greatest bands of 90s. Like Nirvana or Alice In chains.
Ноуп
Me encanta oasis pero eso no les quita lo arrogantes que eran 😏, parecía que les hacían un favor al recoger los premios, cero humildad, pero creo que nos acostumbramos a verlos así, los hermanos gallagher eran sinónimo de soberbia, aunque eso no les quitaba que hacían buena música 👍
La música que hicieron es incomparable y eso es lo que importa.
Idk who won but Gorillaz are doing so better! And whose hand was it on ? Yes the front man of blur 😂
Yeah but it's blur vs oasis, not oasis vs Damon Albarn
are they doing better? oasis have a sold out tour world tour performing to millions… could gorillaz do that?
@@aishah7730they only just reformed. They wouldn’t have stood the test of time otherwise
@@Hutchman98 they were still selling out stadiums in 2009. i think they would’ve been fine.
@@Hutchman98You're kidding right? Blur never broke America, but Oasis did.
Shite life 👌😂
I don't like bout of them.... So, Round one..... FIGHT
Noel looks so hot
Wahahahaha
Liam is my man crush.
Robbies only relevant now talking about a band that broke up 11 years ago
Atleast Robbie can still sing. Liam can't. Sounded like a homeless alcoholic in the mic after the first couple of years.
Song name at 1:41 ?
Rock DJ by Robbie Williams
Cigarettes&Alcoho - oasis
BLUR>>>>OASIS
Oasis sells waaaaaaaaaaaaay more records than blur could ever dream of
Oasis forever
Oasis ❤️
Bro shut up spice girls
como ke shit life >:(
What is bluuuuuur?
Oasis ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Liam con la barba spettacolare
I don't like Robbie😂
oasis > blur
absolutely. blur was nice, but they never could be what oasis was at that moment. the things that oasis generate over the people are incomparable.
blur > oasis
Oasis sure won the Britpop battle but Blur has more than that: 13, s/t album, Think Tank
James Cook oasis had better music
@@spanishsplinters what the fuck? Blur is definitely better. Go listen to them
Oasis won this Battle, but Blur won the war. Twenty-five years later, Blur's discography remains great, and they are mostly known for their music legacy; while Oasis' can only be really proud of their first two albums, and are better known for fights and insults.
I keep loving all those times, and call myself a fan both of Oasis and Blur, but the truth is the truth.
Oasis ganó esta batalla, pero Blur ganó la guerra. veinticinco años después, la discografía de Blur sigue siendo genial, y son conocidos sobre todo por su legado musical; Oasis sólo puede presumir realmente de sus dos primeros discos, y son conocidos más que nada por peleas e insultos.
Sigo amando aquellos años, y me sigo declarando fan tanto de Oasis como de Blur, pero la verdad es la verdad.
Are you a mong ? Mate its the other way around Blur won the battle Oasis won the war.Everyone knows it its very cleary, Very clear in england.
CPOCA yeah I agree with you oasis had more of a cultural impact then blur ever did
Russia Is Number 1 How did Oasis win the war? In terms of popularity? Sure, but even Justin Bieber and Taylor Swift are popular, doesn’t mean their music is good.
Oasis’ post-Morning Glory discography is relatively mediocre. Not a single good album. Whereas Blur proved everyone that their Britpop success was not just a fluke, evolving into true artists, releasing one good album after the other, never sounding the same, and always receiving the highest praise from both critics and fans.
Albarn even outdid himself later on with Gorillaz. Whereas Coxon is still regarded as one of the best and most creative guitarists in the world nowadays.
I really like Oasis, they have some great songs, but Blur are on a completely different level.
@@pringlescan1914 Do You really need the insult to defend your ideas. Pity for this.
Maybe in England, or Russia, people's got this crystal clear. I don't think so. My feedback is Oasis made it greater on fame, but Blur did it on music. They are still respected artists.
Oasis... well, the Gallagher Bross, are still recording good albums on their own, but not so good selling, and definitely outside the main stream. Are They respected as artist? I think not much. Always repeating themselves. And Noel being assailed by funny informal accusations of plagiarism. If not for their fans, they would be completely out of music media, while Damon Albarn had the balls to create something really new and exciting, sell millions, and keep critics mostly on his side.
If Oasis come back someday, there would be great spectation, but not for their music. Bets would be on how many fights, or how much time until they asshamingly split again. And still I'd love it to happen, of course, because as I said before, I'm a fan.
José Francisco Solís Yes you spoon, and to start oasis and blur Brit pop and it was the battle of Brit pop not the battle of Spain or where ever the f*ck you’re from and in England Oasis are the clear winners. I’ll admit it blur have a few good songs but it’s only a few where as oasis first 3 albums almost Everysong is an instant classic even the b sides are. Oasis first 3 albums have the biggest cultural impact on British music since the Beatles and that’s a fact. It is true at first blur did sell more albums but that was at the beginning in the 90s oasis have overwhelmingly surpassed blur now. And I ain’t here comparing there other caress after there bands you numpty I’m talking about oasis and blur. There are many RUclips videos on who won Brit pop and every video says Oasis so do your research and I know what I am talking about since I am from England ask any teenager or kid what do
You think about blur , they will go who ? But ask them oasis they’ll go they’re amAzing class , there music has and will stand the testimony of time whereas blur has two popular British songs that have stayed park life and song 2
Blur are better that Oasis let’s face it
😂 no
Not even close
Their b side album 10x better than anything blur wrote
Facts
Facts
Oasis is just better overall..metalhead, hardcore punk rocker even scenes and pop listeners can enjoy any oasis song
If you are talking specifically about Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory I cannot disagree, but when talking about the balance of an entire career including the members' solo or side projects, Blur ends up doing better.
@@murilosouza4369 yas
@@murilosouza4369 But that makes zero sense, because we're clearly factoring how well each BAND does against each other, not what the individuals did beforehand, during or after the rock bands duration lmao. Bringing in irrelevant factors like Gorillaz just shows a hilarious level of cope, because that isn't Blur, that's Gorillaz, different band and not involved BETWEEN the discussion of Oasis vs Blur as BANDS, not individuals. When you compare and argue whose better between Nirvana and Pearl Jam, I don't go and say "well Nirvana are better anyway because Dave Grohl went and made Foo Fighters", it's a completely different topic that brings in an external factor. Gorillaz dictated the success of Damon, not the band of Blur. Oasis did significantly better, and whilst I also like Blur it's just the facts
@@hughsmith7489 But I'm not conditioning my analysis solely based on the members' solo careers and side projects, I've included the bands' discography themselves. Oasis may even have two masterpieces (Definitely Maybe and Morning Glory), but there are other albums that despite having high points, are merely ok. Meanwhile, Blur, despite having only one great work (Parklife), still has a discography which is very cohesive, has practically no bad material and ends up lasting longer. Solo careers and side projects are just the icing on the cake in this comparison.
@@hughsmith7489 Bloody hell mate you're triggered. Liam isn't going to fuck you so stop gargling on his bollocks
eso mi Robbieeeeeee
blends
You mean bellends?
What the fk?
at least spell it right u tosser
shitelife haha
épicooo
Jesus Robbie Williams 😮 Very strange 😳
Oasis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Blur > who is Oasis?
@@sonicyouth7177the more successful and influencial band
@@sonicyouth7177 That joke would make sense if Oasis weren't the extremely influential and much more popular and successful band, with multiple songs (not just one) to actually solidify their fame. Their main song is actually known by its name, not as the "woo hoo" song
grow up robbie jeez.....
…mate. They’re all immature, self obsessed twats, especially back then.
@@maritime7776 cry bitch.
Blur is fuckin overrats.
Blur have to be one of the most overrated British bands. I much prefer Damon's work with the Gorillaz.
Their songs are very well crafted in my opinion. Graham uses the guitar in various types of creative ways and Alex inputs a lot of cool bass lines. Blur is the best band of the Blur category.
@@peopletakepicturesofeachother, indeed, they were well-crafted, they were no amateurs. But that doesn't make them one of the greats.
I think The Beatles are the most overrated
@@Adam-vy6nl, I'd say they're adequately rated. Hard to dispute their achievements.
What makes someone great in the field of arts?
I guess people really overrate a lot of stuff, but sometimes for the wrong reasons. It becomes more like a plastic discussion, sometimes nonsense, like some "apples are better than oranges" kind of debate.
I think that Blur deserves their credit, their albums from 1993-1999 are full of great moments and creative music representation. Very original stuff. I guess the popularity brings some sort of distorted way of digesting art, mainly music.
I used to listen The Auteurs, Pulp, Kula Shaker, Teenage Fanclub, and a lot, lot more of british things. My dad sometimes imported CD's for me.
I'm from Brazil, and even though I've studied and respectfully and openly listened to lots of britpop era material, At least I was free of a pre-conceived notion of some bands, except knowing that some of them were popular in mid 90's. I remember listening to every second of Blur's 13 album in my Walkman under my blanket when I was a child and it was very special to me, it was just music, creative music. It wasn't overrated lads that girls screams to cause they're "beautiful" and put posters on the bedroom in a poser-way, y'know? It was just absorption of art, and cool sounds.
Oasis is great, kind of a more direct Gibson-driven modern rock n' roll, which is something that I find very unique too, even when minimalistic, still it's Oasis, still it's very recognizable.
Noel Gallagher usually play distorted full chords, while Graham usually creates some specific guitar inputs for the song. For example, observe the guitar line of "Charmless Man" by Blur and "Roll With It", by Oasis.
When I was a teenager I didn't get why people were so fond of Oasis, I thought that were a lot of others complex bands to pay attention to, but now, at 24 yrs old, I see that this type of argument is bullshit. I have my small collection of Oasis albums, and I truly like and respect the music.
About the Beatles, for me it's impossible to imagine that you are living in 1967, buying and listening to Sgt. Peppers, Revolver, White Album or any of these post 1965 albuns for the first time and not thinking that it was lots of groundbreaking, emotional, sometimes raw, sometimes aggressive and beautiful music in these albums. There's nothing like The Beatles. I guess some people hate it because it's to much "popular" even though those critics normally don't have knowledge of half of the Beatles catalog. Some people hate it because they have a preconception that the band only talk about love. Some people hate it cause they don't see what is special about songs that don't sound like Ariana Grande. I guess that in order to absorve music and music concepts, you first have to be open to it.
I've first listened to The Doors when I was a child, but just when I was a teenager I really understand what was special about that tapestry of minimalistic blend of instruments together. Hammond Organs playing bass-parts, very creative guitar lines, and great compositions. Before that it was just a 'okay' band to me.
By the way, thanks for the polite replies, sorry for my shitty english and pardon for the long text.
Robbie called Liam out when Liam was touring overseas. Robbie is 100% gay as the day, no question, and would get killed in the ring by anyone.
I don't think Robbie would mind his "ring" getting killed 🍆
robbie sounds like nerd kid thinking he is funny
Pulp is better
And suede, the two of them are unsung heroes! I do love blur as well, but suede is probably my favourite band of that genre with pulp in close second.
Suede/Pulp/SFA/SuperGrass>>>>>>>>>> aosis&brul
😂😂😂
Suede are truly one of the great British bands at this point. Their first three records (and the B-side compilation 'Sci-Fi Lullabies') are seminal Britpop, and they have had a whole brilliant second act to their career since reforming in 2010. Meanwhile Oasis members are still arsing around trying to repeat what they were doing 30 years ago.
Meh, The Verve and Radiohead beat all of em
That was embarrassing to watch 😂
Not really, it was great!
Blur were mockney, they were middle class wanna be working class...
Oasis genuinely represented the working class with their hardcore, straight edge demeanor and hard hitting rock songs while Blur were just mid-tier fakers making very typical, boring happy-go-lucky songs. Not even remotely comparable in my book.
@@HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva more like the thug class
@@ephebo2027 Truly desperate to defend these mid-tier posers, huh?
@@HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva those happy-go-lucky songs have darker meanings to them.
Oasis were bigger all the fucking Way