Bilkul sahi baat kahi aapne! **"Gujarat jaise projects ke liye, Gujarat jaise vote dene padte hain."** Iska matlab ye hai ki agar kisi rajya ko Gujarat jaise vikas aur industries attract karni hain, toh waha ke logon ko bhi Gujarat jaise samajhdari se sahi sarkar chunni hogi, jo long-term development aur business-friendly policies par dhyaan de. It’s not just about any government being in power-**it’s about the right leadership that consistently pushes for progress**, just like Gujarat has done for years!
The main thing is the consistency of the votes the people of gujrat have given, and not just the consistency of one govt bht the consistency of the right govt, Because had just a consistent party at state level been the requirement, bengal would've been atleast what it was in the 60s when the sogapore's lee kuan yew said he wants to make singapore the calcutta of the south east asia. I think this is a nunace you left here.
The key argument here is that **Gujarat's success lies not just in consistent governance, but in choosing the *right* government**-one focused on development. Simply having the same party in power, like in Bengal, doesn’t guarantee growth. In the 1960s, Calcutta was admired by Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew, but ineffective governance led to decline. Gujarat, on the other hand, has consistently prioritized policies that attract industries, making it a preferred destination over Maharashtra.
I say one thing--
Gujrat jaise projects ke liye Gujrat jaise vote dene padte h
R8👑
Bilkul sahi baat kahi aapne! **"Gujarat jaise projects ke liye, Gujarat jaise vote dene padte hain."** Iska matlab ye hai ki agar kisi rajya ko Gujarat jaise vikas aur industries attract karni hain, toh waha ke logon ko bhi Gujarat jaise samajhdari se sahi sarkar chunni hogi, jo long-term development aur business-friendly policies par dhyaan de.
It’s not just about any government being in power-**it’s about the right leadership that consistently pushes for progress**, just like Gujarat has done for years!
The main thing is the consistency of the votes the people of gujrat have given, and not just the consistency of one govt bht the consistency of the right govt, Because had just a consistent party at state level been the requirement, bengal would've been atleast what it was in the 60s when the sogapore's lee kuan yew said he wants to make singapore the calcutta of the south east asia.
I think this is a nunace you left here.
Brother take a look on last 2-3 mins I told your point there.
Thank you for your comment
The key argument here is that **Gujarat's success lies not just in consistent governance, but in choosing the *right* government**-one focused on development. Simply having the same party in power, like in Bengal, doesn’t guarantee growth. In the 1960s, Calcutta was admired by Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew, but ineffective governance led to decline. Gujarat, on the other hand, has consistently prioritized policies that attract industries, making it a preferred destination over Maharashtra.