I love the chats between the judges after the case. Great addition to the show. I hope at some point we can hear from Douglass and get his perspective as a bailiff 👍
Exactly Same thing I was saying.. Defendant mentioned that he used the 1,000 to repair her car earlier ...Plantiff was wrong clapping and smiling at the verdict , she knows the defendant worked on her car used the money for parts ... She stuck him on labor on the car and parts because he got to pay it back... How can you do someone so dirty, he worked she owes him...
It was best for the defendant to keep fixing the plaintiff's original car instead of offering another vehicle it put him in a worse situation. He was trying to be nice by keeping her on the road while he get the other car fixed but that never happened. The plaintiff won because of the receipt the defendant signed.
I don’t know how familiar people are with civil court but every time they get excited about their judgment I always think to myself; “ better hope that they actually pay it” 😟
@@lynn1505 you and roy should learn how to Google before saying things that aren’t true. First of all the show is nothing but binding arbitration, 2nd they can sue for up to 5Gs but the defendants have NO LEGAL OBLIGATION to pay, 3rd all they receive is a fee for their APPEARANCES. The ONLY show I’ve seen that pays the plaintiff what they won is the Steve Harvey court show. End of discussion
@@LelelapoeteSpeaks There is a fund for each case that pays for the judgements. They used to even state that in every episode. It also says that on Google and on the website. You actually look like a total 🤡 now lmao
I agree that the Kia deal was bad & needed to be undone, but why did the Judge allow her to get the Malibu fixed for free? The man should have been paid for the repairs he did on the Malibu. Judge messed up on this one!
Everyone’s saying “no one’s going to do repairs for free that’s just crazy” but it’s really not. The defendant told the plaintiff how much repairs would be and she told him “forget it then I don’t want the repairs or the car anymore.” That would’ve left the defendant with no money. Plus it’s not like she would’ve just waited for him to repair the car he wanted to sell with no transportation. Therefore, so he could ensure he get some money somehow (from the sell of the car), he told her he’d keep her car running while he fix the car for purchase. It’s not that crazy
Another unlawful ruling. Defendant should have been paid for all the car repairs. As MM always says, court is about making you whole, Not coming out ahead. The plaintiff came out WAY AHEAD in this BS ruling.
The defendant had a point. He didn't charge her anything for the second repair of her car and said he would keep her car going until the new one was ready. Those repairs would add up. I believe him that the 1000 was.for keeping her car going. It was never said whether he had to do any more work on her car. It was a shame that this agreement was not memorialised somewhere. That receipt of the 1000 put down ruined his case. So now she had free repairs for a year and gets to get her deposit back. I think JM ruled a little hastily here.
The judge ruled based on what was in front of her. The receipt and text messengers was the only evidence. The defendant should have written what he wanted to explain to the judge on the receipt.
Judge did not hear Mr Oliver's case. She rushed through. And, another BS judgement. I think she just likes to hear herself and not the litigants so much
That's not fair at all! The Defendant didn't even get to plead his case! She got her car fixed for free. Bad judgment Judge M! SMH! LET people defend themselves! ✌
I knew me and Judge Milan were the same sign because we be getting bored real quick with some of these people! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Answer the question and get to the point! 🤦🏽♀️
She was too quick to conclude this case…the woman got her money back AND she got free repairs to her car! Defendant should have been compensated for his work since she her initial car wouldn’t start and her car was running for the 8 months while she waited for her new car. 🤔
Strongly disagree because he was to deliver a car that didn't need repairs. That was the deal. Not here's a car I said was all good but actually has issues I never told you about that I should fix but would rather you pay for on top of the repairs to your initiql car.. Plus She never got the car, why should she pay for repairs to something they never gave her? That's just such a joke and if you think thats OK, I feel so sorry for you.
He didn't get any money because he breached. Per his own words, the plaintiff was to pay him $1,000 and give him the malibu in exchange for the sorento, to be delivered in 3 months. The deal, also per his words, included that he fix the malibu so that she would have something to drive while he dropped the engine into the sorento. He never delivered the sorento. He also never expected to get paid, until she started saying she wanted her $1,000. Now he feel slighted because 1. he fixed a car he won't be receiving , and 2. he has to return the $1,000. If he would have delivered the sorento when he said he would, nothing else would be at play.
Seriously? Another car case?? Why can’t people be more careful when guys like this come around & don’t wait so long for taking action if they don’t deliver what they promise AFTER you get it in writing!
Notice how in every case they say the judge didn't let them finish their case or hear them out properly I feel this judge is always in a hurry and never let the plaintiff or the defendant to talk
I disagree with the judge on this one I've been disagreeing with her quite a bit lately I've also been disagreeing with most of the cases Judge Judy has been ruling on Judy Justice I noticed a lot with the People's Court and Judy Justice that many of the plaintiffs and defendants say they didn't get a chance to tell their full side of the story I feel like they're cut off without being given a full chance to speak one side speaks almost the whole time and then the other side doesn't say hardly anything I disagree with the judge's ruling on this one because I feel like by her awarding the plaintiff the $1,000 she got her car fixed originally the first time and then for the whole year keeping it running for absolutely free so you're telling me his time and all the work he did was worth absolutely nothing because she wanted to throw a little baby fit over a cracked windshield that would have probably cost her a couple hundred dollars also him having the car for a couple of months is not uncommon during the pandemic my boyfriend is a mechanic at a reputable Car Lot not an alley mechanic and he tells me about certain parts being on backorder for months on end, I really hope the defendant will get things in writing from now on
it’s crazy that she would rather have a car that keeps breaking down over one that has a broken windshield Once again I don’t agree with Judge Milian because he should’ve at least been able to explain the work repairs that he did to her car within that amount of time that she should’ve had to have paid for
No one cares if you're "First, second or third".. grow up you're not in kindergarten anymore. - The Defendant was shady as hell on selling and "fixing" a car for the Plaintiff. Plus making her pay for the cracked windshield... Lol 😂 yeah I don't think so... 🤷♀️🤦♀️
@@WVnurseJo and how does that bother you Karen. I’m sure there are things you do that annoy other people. Are you just going to stop because someone else does not enjoy the same things you do?
Its because she's asked a specific question and he tells her everything but what she wanted. This is why people think she's being rude. It isn't being rude, if she let every litigant she sees in a day just babble on and on she'd never done. Answer the question you're asked and it will move along nicely. Babble and you will get nowhere. Both of these people babbled and it isn't because they're black and if you think that then YOU'RE being racist. It works both ways folks.
Judge Milian, please stop belittling and disrespecting your husband. I cringed when you called him an "idiot", even if it was just in jest. Please honor him and cherish him.
Milan is always impatient with black litigants. Her tone towards blacks is also different than with other races. Her conduct is an embarrassment. She treated dude like shit the whole time. He even said he didn't get to finish his case. If this doesn't show folks how she is particularly with black males then idk what else will.
@@adrianprince7266 We're not in denial of anything. The judge is NOT racist, but we all know YOU are the pot calling the kettle. If you think she is such a racist, WHY do you continue to watch and support her show with your views? That means YOU are supporting racism then. DUH 🤪
I love the chats between the judges after the case. Great addition to the show.
I hope at some point we can hear from Douglass and get his perspective as a bailiff 👍
I've really come to enjoy the chat with Judge's husband at the end. Nice!
Omg I already guessed Harvey was going to talk about "time is of the essence" jeez, saying the same thing for years, give us new legal tips! Lol
Facts but then again…. New viewers who probably never knew or heard.
facts !!
It’s important and I’m pretty sure people still don’t learn a lesson.
He has to repeat it because people still havent learned that fact yet.
I can’t stand the “he hardly knew her” garbage either
Oh my gosh I love the narrator! 😅
not fair he fixed her car for free ??? 500 dollar should have been deducted from the 1000 for 4 months
Exactly Same thing I was saying.. Defendant mentioned that he used the 1,000 to repair her car earlier ...Plantiff was wrong clapping and smiling at the verdict , she knows the defendant worked on her car used the money for parts ... She stuck him on labor on the car and parts because he got to pay it back... How can you do someone so dirty, he worked she owes him...
It was best for the defendant to keep fixing the plaintiff's original car instead of offering another vehicle it put him in a worse situation. He was trying to be nice by keeping her on the road while he get the other car fixed but that never happened. The plaintiff won because of the receipt the defendant signed.
Awww man I thought this was gonna be a case where something crazy went down in Malibu. This is disappointing.
Omg me too and I was just in Malibu this weekend so I got excited to see what happened here lol 😂
there is no cases of people getting hurt by guns in small claims court, next.....
This judge be trippin and just let this lady scam this man for repairs. Nobody repairs cars for free.
Girl quit squinting those eyes.. put you glasses or contacts in
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Right
Agreed girl put your glasses on🤦🏾♀️😂
I agree
I don't think she needs to put any glasses on, I think some Visine would work better.😏
She's laying back like she's with her friends. Disrespectful
I don’t know how familiar people are with civil court but every time they get excited about their judgment I always think to myself; “ better hope that they actually pay it” 😟
I believe People's Court has a budget of $5,000 for each case. That covers judgments (and usually some to each litigant)
@@roymaddocks3184 that’s not true at all. They simply get a small fee for appearing on the show
Roy is right. Each case has a $5000 budget and if you win your case you get
@@lynn1505 you and roy should learn how to Google before saying things that aren’t true. First of all the show is nothing but binding arbitration, 2nd they can sue for up to 5Gs but the defendants have NO LEGAL OBLIGATION to pay, 3rd all they receive is a fee for their APPEARANCES. The ONLY show I’ve seen that pays the plaintiff what they won is the Steve Harvey court show. End of discussion
@@LelelapoeteSpeaks There is a fund for each case that pays for the judgements. They used to even state that in every episode. It also says that on Google and on the website. You actually look like a total 🤡 now lmao
Judge is rushing threw these cases fast lately- dinna in the oven 😂😂
Doug...."Well I don't know what to tell you, its the judge decision" ....he is so rude a little 🙄
I agree that the Kia deal was bad & needed to be undone, but why did the Judge allow her to get the Malibu fixed for free? The man should have been paid for the repairs he did on the Malibu. Judge messed up on this one!
Everyone’s saying “no one’s going to do repairs for free that’s just crazy” but it’s really not. The defendant told the plaintiff how much repairs would be and she told him “forget it then I don’t want the repairs or the car anymore.” That would’ve left the defendant with no money. Plus it’s not like she would’ve just waited for him to repair the car he wanted to sell with no transportation. Therefore, so he could ensure he get some money somehow (from the sell of the car), he told her he’d keep her car running while he fix the car for purchase. It’s not that crazy
Another unlawful ruling. Defendant should have been paid for all the car repairs. As MM always says, court is about making you whole, Not coming out ahead. The plaintiff came out WAY AHEAD in this BS ruling.
The defendant had a point. He didn't charge her anything for the second repair of her car and said he would keep her car going until the new one was ready. Those repairs would add up. I believe him that the 1000 was.for keeping her car going. It was never said whether he had to do any more work on her car. It was a shame that this agreement was not memorialised somewhere. That receipt of the 1000 put down ruined his case. So now she had free repairs for a year and gets to get her deposit back. I think JM ruled a little hastily here.
No he said I will keep your car running
The judge ruled based on what was in front of her. The receipt and text messengers was the only evidence. The defendant should have written what he wanted to explain to the judge on the receipt.
The judge blew this 1. She gave this girl a bonanza she made him give back her $1000 the repairs done to her car were free.. What did they do that at?
Because he said I will keep your Malibu running.
@@tangoandali6112 that’s because it was gonna be his car and he probably didn’t want her to blow the motor or some thing on it
He's right, she got her car fixed for free
Judge did not hear Mr Oliver's case. She rushed through. And, another BS judgement. I think she just likes to hear herself and not the litigants so much
Exactly she is very annoying and very aggressive
Fast yappin jive talkin defendant.
He looks and talks like Terrell Owens
That's not fair at all! The Defendant didn't even get to plead his case! She got her car fixed for free. Bad judgment Judge M! SMH! LET people defend themselves! ✌
The plaintiff looks high as hell in the opening segment! Hardcore squinting!
Because she not wearing glasses
The receipt said deposit not for repairs
Both of them look throwed off. 😂
I knew me and Judge Milan were the same sign because we be getting bored real quick with some of these people! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Answer the question and get to the point! 🤦🏽♀️
Aries?
@@mel...s probably bc I am 🤣
@@anaa03899 me too 😂💁and I have no patience for bs
Aries are very impatient and firery for no damn reason
Judge Mathis is one too
She was too quick to conclude this case…the woman got her money back AND she got free repairs to her car! Defendant should have been compensated for his work since she her initial car wouldn’t start and her car was running for the 8 months while she waited for her new car. 🤔
Strongly disagree because he was to deliver a car that didn't need repairs. That was the deal. Not here's a car I said was all good but actually has issues I never told you about that I should fix but would rather you pay for on top of the repairs to your initiql car.. Plus She never got the car, why should she pay for repairs to something they never gave her? That's just such a joke and if you think thats OK, I feel so sorry for you.
Girl you look ridiculous squinting 😂 stop it
Glasses
He didn't get any money because he breached. Per his own words, the plaintiff was to pay him $1,000 and give him the malibu in exchange for the sorento, to be delivered in 3 months. The deal, also per his words, included that he fix the malibu so that she would have something to drive while he dropped the engine into the sorento. He never delivered the sorento. He also never expected to get paid, until she started saying she wanted her $1,000. Now he feel slighted because 1. he fixed a car he won't be receiving , and 2. he has to return the $1,000. If he would have delivered the sorento when he said he would, nothing else would be at play.
Seriously? Another car case?? Why can’t people be more careful when guys like this come around & don’t wait so long for taking action if they don’t deliver what they promise AFTER you get it in writing!
If you can't call your man an idiot like that, he's just not funny.
Notice how in every case they say the judge didn't let them finish their case or hear them out properly I feel this judge is always in a hurry and never let the plaintiff or the defendant to talk
Stop using the race card people. Answer the questions you're asked without adding an encyclopedia of info to the mix. Bare facts get a case solved.
I disagree with the judge on this one I've been disagreeing with her quite a bit lately I've also been disagreeing with most of the cases Judge Judy has been ruling on Judy Justice I noticed a lot with the People's Court and Judy Justice that many of the plaintiffs and defendants say they didn't get a chance to tell their full side of the story I feel like they're cut off without being given a full chance to speak one side speaks almost the whole time and then the other side doesn't say hardly anything I disagree with the judge's ruling on this one because I feel like by her awarding the plaintiff the $1,000 she got her car fixed originally the first time and then for the whole year keeping it running for absolutely free so you're telling me his time and all the work he did was worth absolutely nothing because she wanted to throw a little baby fit over a cracked windshield that would have probably cost her a couple hundred dollars also him having the car for a couple of months is not uncommon during the pandemic my boyfriend is a mechanic at a reputable Car Lot not an alley mechanic and he tells me about certain parts being on backorder for months on end, I really hope the defendant will get things in writing from now on
it’s crazy that she would rather have a car that keeps breaking down over one that has a broken windshield
Once again I don’t agree with Judge Milian because he should’ve at least been able to explain the work repairs that he did to her car within that amount of time that she should’ve had to have paid for
I wonder if the question referred to a show season🤔😂
Me too 🤣
4500+Malibu for Kia Sorento, what a complete rip off!!!
Bushwick Bill
Anyone else see a literal tear mark running down his face from crying? I'd cry too if I was so wrong to someone like this
Americans always want to make things about race, she speaks to everybody the same
Think judge got this wrong he made sure she stayed on the road n she paid nothing that’s messed up
Why is she squinting 😂
He’s tight😂
Gosh!!!
no sympathy for people buying cars online or "sight unseen".
No one cares if you're "First, second or third".. grow up you're not in kindergarten anymore. -
The Defendant was shady as hell on selling and "fixing" a car for the Plaintiff. Plus making her pay for the cracked windshield... Lol 😂 yeah I don't think so... 🤷♀️🤦♀️
Damn karen, people can’t have harmless fun?
@@Grovel007
It's childish
@@WVnurseJo and how does that bother you Karen. I’m sure there are things you do that annoy other people. Are you just going to stop because someone else does not enjoy the same things you do?
@@Grovel007 what's it to you how I feel? You gonna write a book on feelings? Get a life child and don't worry bout it... Sheesh 🙄
@@WVnurseJo you see how you don’t care about my feelings, that is how everyone feels about you being annoyed at someone typing first.
The judge didnt wNt to hear his case because she didnt wNt to get confused cus she knowx nothing about cars
Judge got it wrong but by law she has to go by the receipt 🤷🏻♂️, he fkd up now putting that on there
Football season isa season!
Marilyn didn't let the defendant speak. wtf
Its because she's asked a specific question and he tells her everything but what she wanted. This is why people think she's being rude. It isn't being rude, if she let every litigant she sees in a day just babble on and on she'd never done.
Answer the question you're asked and it will move along nicely. Babble and you will get nowhere. Both of these people babbled and it isn't because they're black and if you think that then YOU'RE being racist. It works both ways folks.
People always accuse the judge of being racist or sexist if the verdict is not what they agree with.
@ get in no,she is rude. She often does this. It's highly disrespectful.
If you want rude Jude judy
@@getin3949 , Lady , you babble on and on about nonsense. You are not a bright woman 🙄🙄
I'm not buying a car with no cracked window❌((correction)) I am not buying a car with a cracked window☑️
Judge Milan can be irritating 😒
7
I clicked because of his lips. Horrendous! But he is handsome.
Fourth's
Judge Milian, please stop belittling and disrespecting your husband. I cringed when you called him an "idiot", even if it was just in jest. Please honor him and cherish him.
Stop being ridiculous they've been together 20+ years they don't need ur input
For thirds…
Secondly
Milan is always impatient with black litigants. Her tone towards blacks is also different than with other races. Her conduct is an embarrassment. She treated dude like shit the whole time. He even said he didn't get to finish his case. If this doesn't show folks how she is particularly with black males then idk what else will.
She is extremely rude and loud!
She's always been "extra" with black folk. Folks denying it are in complete denial.
😑 no
@@adrianprince7266 We're not in denial of anything. The judge is NOT racist, but we all know YOU are the pot calling the kettle. If you think she is such a racist, WHY do you continue to watch and support her show with your views? That means YOU are supporting racism then. DUH 🤪
@@cynthiavaldez7127 I guess you must like extremely rude and loud people then because that doesn't stop you from watching her show.