Tree guys are always shady.. never pay them in full until you're sure the work is completed. No matter how much they complain about "needing to pay their guys"
Maybe where your from. All the arborist I've met around here have been decent dudes. Just hired a crew to do 15k worth of tree work (under brush clearing in pines) at a house I'm in charge of getting ready to sell and they've been nothing but respectful, on time and appreciative for the work.
I own a tree service, and we never get paid until the job is finished and the customer is happy. We never have complaints and have great reviews. This guy wasn’t even a tree guy, more of a landscaper sounds like to me.
My ex used to cut down trees for people (not a company but more like a handyman) & stump removal was never included & said it wasn’t an option with him. And we live in a large cup du sac & there’s a certain well known tree cutting service here & even they won’t touch stumps. When one is needed to be removed, it’s another company that comes to remove it.
He was gonna just cut the tree to ground level and then pour concrete over it🙄, and if the tree lives it will push through and crack the pad and if its dead then it will rot and be a weak point under the concrete……..either one would make the pad fail eventually! 🤨🤦🏽♂️
I don't think they were going to do a concrete pad.... For a shed, level and compact some type II. But yeah, the stump should be gone for that project.
That actually happened to me. We were building a patio for the backyard and part of the roots of our large tree pushed through the concrete hand to shorten the length of patio.
These two deserve each other. Both have personalities parallel to fingernails on a chalkboard. I might have to sue for pain and suffering, the headache caused by the sound of their voices.
My ex used to cut down trees for people (not a company but more like a handyman) & stump removal was never included & said it wasn’t an option with him. And we live in a large cup du sac & there’s a certain well known tree cutting service here & even they won’t touch stumps. When one is needed to be removed, it’s another company that comes to remove it.
you never give more. than 10% of the cost up front. my guy has done tree work/landscaping for over 30 years. He has never asked for more than that. As far as the stumps go, you can flush them right to the ground if you do not have a stump grinder. He never leaves a job unless the customer is 100% happy with his work.
You can’t pour concrete over a stump unless you want to have it busted up and replaced after a year or 2 and the best practice is 50/50 before and after granted you do research on who you’re hiring and make sure they have good reviews, reliable, and professional with quality work .
I think giving the plaintiff only $250 was not a fair judgment. This contractor was making excuses for what he knew to be bad practice. On top of that he charged for hauling just to dump it across the street. He misrepresented services he never intended to do. The way he kept making excuses lets you know thks is the way he runs his business. The $250 judgment will not serve as a deterrent, but at least people can see his face and know not to do business with him smh.
Geesh I'm glad you are not a judge. You want to charge a person extra for their crime to make an example of them, instead of giving them a fair verdict like every person should get? Calm down a bit there Adolph
What about the shed pad? He never poured it and was going to pour over a stump? That makes no sense. The plaintiff just assumed the stump would be removed to properly install a shed pad. If it was a straight tree removal, I know (from previous experience) the grinding of the stump would be a separate charge. The landscaper admitted he didn't have experience with installing a shed pad, after he took the job. Plaintiff should have gotten the full 750.
I agree that the work order about trunk removal needed to be more specific. He was bang to rights on dumping the fence though. That was seriously dodgy. He can get someone else to complete the work and he had some money back so I think it was fair. The defendant needs to face up more to his responsibilities.
The Plaintiff looks young enough to go out and deal with the rest of the ivy and move the fence. For fuck's sake, I'm almost 70 and still install my window a/c, got up on the roof the other day to check my LED antenna, mow my own lawn, snow blow my own snow. You have to keep moving or you WILL get old.
… nothing wrong with paying for services. Your comment is weird. Time is money. He can spend time with his family and someone else can mow the grass because he has the money
A major problem with so many Americans is that they spend more time sedate rather than giving their bodies the exercise that it needs and loves. A good yard cleaning exercises many muscles, you sleep better and stave off obesity &/or heart disease.
i really don't get how people don't do a good job. these people pay good money for these jobs. i guess they live on the fact that people won't waste time going to court
Lawyers think it's so easy for a person (after having explained to the company exactly what they want) to then question what the company has put in their quote, if you start insisting that EVERYTHING be detailed, you will be considered a difficult client and they will then refuse to work for you. If he hired a company to remove a tree, he expects it to be completely gone, not a stump left, especially when this company claims to do stump removal and he had specifically said he was going to put up a shed in that spot, so I don't agree with the judge, and since the company was pretty dodgy from the start, I think they were very vague in their quote on purpose to be able to say 'it's not in the quote, so that will be extra'...
Tree removal and stump removal are 2 different jobs. It would be good if the defendant lists does not include stumps. But Tree removal is not tree and stump those are 2 different jobs in the Tree Industry (common knowledge). Since he agreed to remove the fence I would of gave the Plaintiff maybe the time of day but no money.
THE PLAINTIFF WAS ON HIS SHIT BUT HE GOT GREEDY & WANTED EVERY PENNY BK TYPICAL WANTING EVERYTHING DONE & NOT HAVING TO PAY FOR ANYTHING THE DEFENDANT ON THE OTHER HAND HMMMMMM IF NOT FOR NOTHING BUT I BELIEVE THAT HE MIGHT BE A LITTLE CHALLENGED WHICH IS PERFECTLY FINE HE JUST NEEDS TO USE BETTER WORDING I AGREE PIVK UP THAT FENCE & PAY $250 FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE REMAINING IVY
So, you like to use the word "so"? So, am I right? So, maybe you'll see this clip and try to stop using " so", so maybe you'll be more conscious of using it??
![Judge Judy [Episode 9687] Best Amazing Cases Season 2025 Full Episodes HD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4ziCIuyQIu8/mqdefault.jpg)
THE CUTE DOG BEHIND THE DEFENDENT!!! 😍 😂 I had to rewind it to before it was whisked away lol
The most interesting part of this case is the dog dancing in the background. 😆👍
Tree guys are always shady.. never pay them in full until you're sure the work is completed. No matter how much they complain about "needing to pay their guys"
"Tree guys are always shady.....😂 good one 👍😂
@@MsTruthhurts007 I dead ass didn’t even realize what I did there, but that was awesome 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Maybe where your from. All the arborist I've met around here have been decent dudes. Just hired a crew to do 15k worth of tree work (under brush clearing in pines) at a house I'm in charge of getting ready to sell and they've been nothing but respectful, on time and appreciative for the work.
I own a tree service, and we never get paid until the job is finished and the customer is happy. We never have complaints and have great reviews. This guy wasn’t even a tree guy, more of a landscaper sounds like to me.
My ex used to cut down trees for people (not a company but more like a handyman) & stump removal was never included & said it wasn’t an option with him. And we live in a large cup du sac & there’s a certain well known tree cutting service here & even they won’t touch stumps. When one is needed to be removed, it’s another company that comes to remove it.
Doug's sarcasm is hilarious!!😂😂
@ 6:00 I thought she was going to say “let me look at that puppy in the background 😍” lol little cutie! 🐩
Omg he still has a rotary phone ( on wall behind him ) lol awesome
Lmbo
He was gonna just cut the tree to ground level and then pour concrete over it🙄, and if the tree lives it will push through and crack the pad and if its dead then it will rot and be a weak point under the concrete……..either one would make the pad fail eventually! 🤨🤦🏽♂️
This is what I thought..
😱
This is a crazy to me
I don't think they were going to do a concrete pad....
For a shed, level and compact some type II.
But yeah, the stump should be gone for that project.
That actually happened to me. We were building a patio for the backyard and part of the roots of our large tree pushed through the concrete hand to shorten the length of patio.
I loved seeing Chris’ dog jump into the shot, and how his boyfriend rushed to get the dog.
No tree removal and stump grinding is two separate services I use to work for a tree company
These two deserve each other. Both have personalities parallel to fingernails on a chalkboard. I might have to sue for pain and suffering, the headache caused by the sound of their voices.
😂😂😂 right!!!
That dog photo bombing 😂😂😂😂
I wonder if Mr. White’s phone on that back wall still works🤔
My ex used to cut down trees for people (not a company but more like a handyman) & stump removal was never included & said it wasn’t an option with him. And we live in a large cup du sac & there’s a certain well known tree cutting service here & even they won’t touch stumps. When one is needed to be removed, it’s another company that comes to remove it.
The defendant sounds like such a dope. I feel like not a lot of forethought goes in to his life.
Everyone- talking about the case
Me- 😍🙊🙈🙉♥️OMGG DID THE YOU SEE THE PUPPY!!?? ✨ Proceeds to rewind 50 times✨🤣🤣🤣 He was sooo cuteee😍😍😍😍
I love and almost hate seeing them age. They seem to be be eternal.
Absolutely
you never give more. than 10% of the cost up front. my guy has done tree work/landscaping for over 30 years. He has never asked for more than that. As far as the stumps go, you can flush them right to the ground if you do not have a stump grinder. He never leaves a job unless the customer is 100% happy with his work.
You can’t pour concrete over a stump unless you want to have it busted up and replaced after a year or 2 and the best practice is 50/50 before and after granted you do research on who you’re hiring and make sure they have good reviews, reliable, and professional with quality work .
The dog 😂😂😂
best part of the case🤣
The rule should be that when these cases are virtual, you must show your pets 😂
1:54 Well the plaintiff named a “pear tree “, but what about a partridge?😂😂😂
The Cheap Comes Out Expensive.
" Cans Of Mas Macho." lmbao
I think giving the plaintiff only $250 was not a fair judgment. This contractor was making excuses for what he knew to be bad practice. On top of that he charged for hauling just to dump it across the street. He misrepresented services he never intended to do. The way he kept making excuses lets you know thks is the way he runs his business. The $250 judgment will not serve as a deterrent, but at least people can see his face and know not to do business with him smh.
Geesh I'm glad you are not a judge. You want to charge a person extra for their crime to make an example of them, instead of giving them a fair verdict like every person should get? Calm down a bit there Adolph
What about the shed pad? He never poured it and was going to pour over a stump? That makes no sense. The plaintiff just assumed the stump would be removed to properly install a shed pad. If it was a straight tree removal, I know (from previous experience) the grinding of the stump would be a separate charge. The landscaper admitted he didn't have experience with installing a shed pad, after he took the job. Plaintiff should have gotten the full 750.
WOW! Yellow Curtains and a rotary dial phone. Was this episode from 1972...😂🤣
LoL. I came to comments for the same reason 🤣😂
I was wondering the same thing🤔🤓
Height of incompetency and irresponsibility ……that is the defendant .
Keep em' coming, love these cases.
Can we talk about that odd rotary wall phone randomly hanging on the wall behind the Plaintiff?!
I like it!
I love seeing old technology like that! It reminds me of my grandparents.
Removing a tree and removing a stump is 2 COMPLETELY different things. And this Mr Cheapo plaintiff was trying to be sneaky.
Chris was sued in another episode... and his mommy was with him
If you find the episode here on youtube please let me know
@@Garnerlifewithawesomekidsruclips.net/video/paVr7mX2AHM/видео.html
@@Garnerlifewithawesomekids I know it's a year later, lol. But the name of the case is "Cracking Up A Customer." I linked it above 😊
@@MrsMeeker0328 thank you so much! I always love watching connected cases back to back.
@@Garnerlifewithawesomekids no problem!! I was shocked that I found it as quick as I did 😅
This is embarrassing for the defendant. Dude is just incompetent on every level with respect to what his job was to do here. Insane case
Wow..commenting on two guys...no wimminzzzz bashing...
Oh, wait...you all ready did elsewhere...
Never mind
@@heidicrimmings9615~ I’m just as surprised as you!
Wrong, stump removal is slays listed on invoices separately. It is difficult and expensive. And usually includes machine rental fees.
Mr White knows this would be a extra cost but wanted to add what he could get away with....they both have that kind of way
Doggie 🐶 so cute.
The defendant was in this court before.
Yep! I just found the case 😂
JUST. WOW.
6 minute mark, the doggy in the background is cute.
Who else is absolutely addicted to The People’s Court!?! Like below if you’re obsessed like me lol
I like it but I'm not obsessed or addicted. Addictions have underlying problems.
@@getin3949 it’s not that serious. My god. 🙄 it’s a figure of speech.
one of my all time favorite videos is how JM handles the Clocking a Brother case
@@samanthameier4371 exactly girl lol some people need to chill
one of my several obsessions....human condition is always interesting
I agree that the work order about trunk removal needed to be more specific. He was bang to rights on dumping the fence though. That was seriously dodgy. He can get someone else to complete the work and he had some money back so I think it was fair. The defendant needs to face up more to his responsibilities.
you know that you've watch too much of this show when you know exactly what and HOW MUCH the judge is going to rule for
or have seen the defendant in this case in another case.
No way I could live somewhere where there's a season for working.
The Plaintiff looks young enough to go out and deal with the rest of the ivy and move the fence. For fuck's sake, I'm almost 70 and still install my window a/c, got up on the roof the other day to check my LED antenna, mow my own lawn, snow blow my own snow. You have to keep moving or you WILL get old.
use it or lose it....a truism readily evident to us seniors
… nothing wrong with paying for services. Your comment is weird. Time is money. He can spend time with his family and someone else can mow the grass because he has the money
A major problem with so many Americans is that they spend more time sedate rather than giving their bodies the exercise that it needs and loves. A good yard cleaning exercises many muscles, you sleep better and stave off obesity &/or heart disease.
i really don't get how people don't do a good job. these people pay good money for these jobs. i guess they live on the fact that people won't waste time going to court
Lawyers think it's so easy for a person (after having explained to the company exactly what they want) to then question what the company has put in their quote, if you start insisting that EVERYTHING be detailed, you will be considered a difficult client and they will then refuse to work for you.
If he hired a company to remove a tree, he expects it to be completely gone, not a stump left, especially when this company claims to do stump removal and he had specifically said he was going to put up a shed in that spot, so I don't agree with the judge, and since the company was pretty dodgy from the start, I think they were very vague in their quote on purpose to be able to say 'it's not in the quote, so that will be extra'...
Crazy how polite and letting the litigants talk in full the judge is when both parties are white
the defendant was in another case. i guess the peoples court is officially a tv show with actors now and a script.
Tree removal and stump removal are 2 different jobs. It would be good if the defendant lists does not include stumps. But Tree removal is not tree and stump those are 2 different jobs in the Tree Industry (common knowledge). Since he agreed to remove the fence I would of gave the Plaintiff maybe the time of day but no money.
Did anyone else notice that the plaintiff has a rotary phone on his wall?
he is so old school but couldn't create a scope of work/proper invoice🤦♂️
oh yeah...I noticed
Lol I hate being early. I rely on the comments to tell me who to hate 😂😂
lmao at this relatable comment
Made me laugh 😂
The only chance the Defendant has is more dog 🐶 minutes.
🤦 He charged dump fees but didnt take the fence to the dump.
He didn’t take the tree to the dump but he did take all the other debris that he cleaned up.
@@4everThoughtful
Which is why nothing in my comment mentions the tree
@@stephaniehowe0973 I'm sorry, my mistake!! He didn't take the FENCE to the dump but he took other debris to it for the $150.
@@4everThoughtful
I cant recall if there was a receipt from the dump?
We don't pay anything here, except tires & fridges
To put a shed bad how to get a survey of the property if Sonic one of the property
I wouldn't hire the landscaper to pick up dog poop. His communication skills lack bad. He is a business owner, not a laborer.
THE PLAINTIFF WAS ON HIS SHIT BUT HE GOT GREEDY & WANTED EVERY PENNY BK TYPICAL WANTING EVERYTHING DONE & NOT HAVING TO PAY FOR ANYTHING THE DEFENDANT ON THE OTHER HAND HMMMMMM IF NOT FOR NOTHING BUT I BELIEVE THAT HE MIGHT BE A LITTLE CHALLENGED WHICH IS PERFECTLY FINE HE JUST NEEDS TO USE BETTER WORDING I AGREE PIVK UP THAT FENCE & PAY $250 FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE REMAINING IVY
The Defendant is a small Castle nathan fillion
Lazy unprofessional contractor.
Wow what an unprofessional man, unbelievable how he runs his business. Once he has the money he just dips, pathetic.
The defendant is lazy.. this case is annoying.
I guess he was on the show before called Cracking up a Customer, dude has issues
Chris looks pissed!!! judge sounds like she's his mother
Lol I was only half way listening and I thought this is the plaintiff James he’s white haha. I was like what. Haha
The plaintiff way of talking is very annoying
So, you like to use the word "so"? So, am I right? So, maybe you'll see this clip and try to stop using " so", so maybe you'll be more conscious of using it??
old video
I really don’t like Doug!!!!
Am I 1st OMG
3rd