Why The Non-Date Rolex Submariner is The Watch Collectors Choice

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • You can't deny that the symmetry in the dial is pleasing to the eye. #rolex #submariner #divewatch
    Join our WhatsApp Watch Deals Group - chat.whatsapp....

Комментарии • 112

  • @SmokeRingsPipeDreams
    @SmokeRingsPipeDreams Год назад +115

    I've always thought the no date looked better. Cleaner. Plus, I don't like to set the date, and when I don't set the date I feel bad. No date, no problems.

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад +16

      ‘No date, no problems’ - I like that one

    • @nichkej8833
      @nichkej8833 Год назад +2

      I actually feel the same, but IMO day and date are much more useful for me on a watch than the actual time (I find them really handy when checking the gym's closing times for example).
      I know you can look it up on your phone, but I prefer my watch to my phone for oretty much everything.

    • @francisfowler4908
      @francisfowler4908 9 месяцев назад

      I have gmt ii i never fix the date haha

    • @watching_nyc
      @watching_nyc 3 месяца назад

      @@francisfowler4908I get it. It takes quite a few turns of the crown!

    • @paulbonaventura4969
      @paulbonaventura4969 2 месяца назад +1

      If you're diving...if you need a date you're underwater too long.

  • @rustydrog
    @rustydrog 8 месяцев назад +37

    These lads would offer you £6k for you £8k pile of 20 pound notes

  • @tUBEROCKErPriyankar
    @tUBEROCKErPriyankar 3 месяца назад +9

    The Non Date one gives the full view of the dial without any obstructions. ❤

  • @jeffroutledge9153
    @jeffroutledge9153 Год назад +28

    It's really not a "non date Sub", it's just a Sub. They simply made a date version out of this. Also, I wouldn't refer to it as ugly in any way, shape or form. It is much more clean and perfectly symmetrical than the Sub date. Especially without the ugly cyclops glued on the crystal.
    No, this is the original base line Submariner in all it's perfection.

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад +6

      “The ugly duckling” is a figure of speech. The Submariner (without the date) is definitely a great looking watch

    • @Classic_Vinyl_Only
      @Classic_Vinyl_Only Год назад +2

      It’s not rare either

    • @eddiel7635
      @eddiel7635 Год назад

      @@Classic_Vinyl_Only he said it’s ‘rarer’ not its rare. Pull your head out your arse.

    • @mrebear9758
      @mrebear9758 Год назад +1

      ​@@WatchtraderSubmariner*

    • @BIG2hats
      @BIG2hats 6 месяцев назад

      It’s definitely ugly compared to the date version come on, just look at this thing

  • @mrsmith8224
    @mrsmith8224 Год назад +46

    There is a 124060 for 11450 Pounds on their shop
    Talk about a rip off and then you wonder

    • @tzj21
      @tzj21 7 месяцев назад +2

      That’s because the ones sold on their shop is unworn. Also depends on date man, if it’s a 2024 then of course

    • @BIG2hats
      @BIG2hats 6 месяцев назад +2

      How is that a rip off? It’s called business, how do you think the economy works?! How else do businesses pay their employees and bills??

  • @Matt-uq3in
    @Matt-uq3in Год назад +37

    The submariner is pure class with out the cyclops wort 🔥👌

  • @Soulheads-yy3zq
    @Soulheads-yy3zq Год назад +14

    Date of no date, hardtop or convertible, waxed or hairy… one isn’t better… it’s all about your preference.

    • @mema4922
      @mema4922 6 месяцев назад +2

      Obviously 😂

    • @mrb6597
      @mrb6597 5 месяцев назад +1

      Nope, no-date is actually better. 😂

    • @Soulheads-yy3zq
      @Soulheads-yy3zq 5 месяцев назад

      @@mrb6597 I wear the 124060 so no argument from me on your opinion.

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 2 месяца назад

      The Cyclops is an iconic and immediately recognizable Rolex feature. A Rolex purchase is too big a financial commitment to be influenced by social media hipster dufus. These are the same dopes that will tell you a 34mm watch looks good on a 7.5 inch wrist because Muhammad Ali wore one. Try the them both on, if you like a visually smaller dial then go for Date as it has less negative space. If you don’t like the look of the Cyclops then you have a No-date option. If it’s going to be your only Sub, I’d get the Date complication for its utility and distinctive feature.

  • @DizzKidz
    @DizzKidz Год назад +4

    I think the no date looks better. After getting one though, I understand the convenience of having a date window. If i cant get a titanium yacht master, my next rolex will be a blue jubilee gmt.

  • @nintendokings
    @nintendokings Год назад +25

    These guys will say whether nonsense to make the watch seem like a good deal

    • @markr3926
      @markr3926 3 месяца назад +2

      Correct. Stay away from grey dealers the 💩 just comes out like a waterfall they can’t switch off

  • @galandaleonardogabriel4508
    @galandaleonardogabriel4508 Год назад +2

    I just got my Submariner a month ago.. Gold on black bazel, date of course...
    If i would have waited another month i would have got it for at least 600-800€ cheaper...
    The watch market is plunging down...

  • @HammerK99
    @HammerK99 Год назад +2

    Shout to archieluxury. Lol
    And it being rare isn’t the reason. It’s bc of the cleaner dial/look and the fact that the original sub never had a date. 1954 I believe.

  • @johnt2694
    @johnt2694 10 месяцев назад +2

    No Date IMO has a cleaner look and better symmetry. Not a big fan of the Cyclops and having to set the date.

  • @shrkys4
    @shrkys4 13 дней назад

    Is that a 5512? I picked up my very first Rolex in 97 as a 14060, paid $2400, left me wanting for the date 16610 which I've owned since 98...My 14060 did not have the superlative chrono script, I think it was added for later models

  • @michaelfrancis2749
    @michaelfrancis2749 Месяц назад

    Cyclops is ugly and was only needed in the 1900s or someone who's old and blind, LOL! No date is the best!

  • @paulmartin3242
    @paulmartin3242 Год назад +10

    How can I buy one for 6k

  • @tellsteveharveyidontwanthe2283
    @tellsteveharveyidontwanthe2283 Год назад +2

    buy whichever you like more its all hype and demand it will probably always switch up

  • @DadeMurphie
    @DadeMurphie 2 месяца назад

    This is just a massive insult to supposed connoisseurs. This mass produced submariner isn't rare. They both sold out and there are plenty of either out there.

  • @TakeAmericaBack2010
    @TakeAmericaBack2010 Год назад +1

    False. IG is used to do one thing “influence”. Do your own research.

  • @tajislam5643
    @tajislam5643 13 дней назад

    Yeah right this is bs you need the one with date always better

  • @Harpreet06
    @Harpreet06 Год назад +1

    It's my choice because I hate the cyclops

  • @pauliewalnuts5241
    @pauliewalnuts5241 10 месяцев назад +1

    6k? Very low ball offer.

  • @philipsoucie3015
    @philipsoucie3015 11 месяцев назад +2

    I would buy everyone I could find at that price. That sells in Canada 10-13K all day long.

    • @DadeMurphie
      @DadeMurphie 2 месяца назад

      8K pounds is 14.25K Canadian. I'm sure you can find that price.

    • @fhaquuu
      @fhaquuu Месяц назад

      Give it a few years. These will go up big time as supply of good condition models get harder to find.

  • @thematthewlong
    @thematthewlong Год назад +3

    True dive watch - date window affects vision while 75 meters under water.

    • @DadeMurphie
      @DadeMurphie 2 месяца назад

      but what if you need to know the date while you're down there?

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 2 месяца назад

      You will never dive below 30m

  • @ANONYMOUS-xo1qm
    @ANONYMOUS-xo1qm Год назад +5

    Everytime I see this guy rip someone off I get so pissed.I can’t take it anymore,pressing the don’t recommend button

    • @Fishin_Carolina
      @Fishin_Carolina 4 месяца назад

      It’s not him, it’s the whole industry. Everyone I hear a dealer talk I feel like I need to take a shower.

  • @davidmartinez2999
    @davidmartinez2999 Месяц назад

    I have the date version. I also have a non cyclops seiko. From a distance looks just like a sub. I’d rather have a date function than not have it.

  • @BikeronaTrek
    @BikeronaTrek 2 месяца назад

    A no date makes sense. It is easier to set the watch, you only have to set it for a 12 hour period, and you don't have to set a date, which you don't need under water anyway. The dial and crystal look clean. One less complication to wear out. Easier to service. Costs less.

  • @HelloMatthewLong
    @HelloMatthewLong 2 месяца назад

    116900 will be same way in several decades

  • @montys8th
    @montys8th Месяц назад

    The non-date Sub is more popular due to Sean Connery wearing it as Bond. No other reason.

  • @oreoyeliab
    @oreoyeliab 3 месяца назад

    I’ve had both. I sold the cyclops about ten years ago. I just purchased the No Date and I absolutely love it!! I will never part with this watch!!

  • @ernstachildiyev2155
    @ernstachildiyev2155 5 месяцев назад

    How does it make it more “rarer” just because it’s less popular? Rolex makes the same amount of stock regardless of demand.

  • @eerr1438
    @eerr1438 10 месяцев назад

    It’s rarer 😂? The ugly duckling?😂
    These fellas crack me up??
    Total 🏀 ocks

  • @redbike6340
    @redbike6340 Месяц назад

    I will steer well clear of this establishment thank you very much 😎

  • @FeathersMcGraw90
    @FeathersMcGraw90 9 месяцев назад

    Beleive it or not the is not the non date sub but the submariner. Then you have the submariner date

  • @austinzizzi1142
    @austinzizzi1142 2 месяца назад

    No watch people have always only wanted the no date

  • @kingofthebridge8339
    @kingofthebridge8339 3 месяца назад

    Rarer, cheaper, cheaper to service and nicer dial.

  • @denis888red
    @denis888red 3 месяца назад

    Bottom line... Personal preference.

  • @SewerGang
    @SewerGang 2 месяца назад +2

    why get a watch without the date? defeats the purpose

  • @no79way
    @no79way 4 месяца назад

    The problem it doesn’t come in green

  • @itheus
    @itheus Год назад +10

    Love this bullshit

  • @islandstonie8978
    @islandstonie8978 Год назад +7

    What a scammers, just paying 6.000 for this watch

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад

      How much would you buy this for in your retail store? We didn’t buy the watch either

  • @mapa_83
    @mapa_83 7 месяцев назад

    Bad rip off merchants these

  • @modmod392
    @modmod392 Год назад +7

    £6k…!!?? Must be a 35% mark up. Jeez.

  • @sundown6436
    @sundown6436 9 месяцев назад

    way below market price....

  • @MultiSeriousness
    @MultiSeriousness 7 месяцев назад

    Holes case with engraved Rehaut? Something doesn’t seem right

    • @patrickbateman8699
      @patrickbateman8699 2 месяца назад +2

      14060 went to 14060M when the rolex around 2002 remove from all watches lug holes the 14060M keep its holes until 2012 the last rolex with holes and yes you read it right 2012... when ceramic sub was on at 2010.. and rolex add reheat at 2007-8 until 2012 on the 14060M

  • @pauljohnson3686
    @pauljohnson3686 9 месяцев назад

    So.. If you pay £6000.. How much do you sell it for?

    • @BIG2hats
      @BIG2hats 6 месяцев назад

      About 8-12k depending on condition and year

  • @WATCH-4U
    @WATCH-4U 4 месяца назад

    I love this model

  • @tafkawac
    @tafkawac Год назад

    i'll give him 6.5k

  • @pachy44
    @pachy44 6 месяцев назад

    I just bought that watch on March 20 from my AD in NJ... 😎 ⌚️

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 2 месяца назад

      What is the name of the AD in NJ?

    • @pachy44
      @pachy44 2 месяца назад

      ​@@michaelriera6277Short Hills Mall

  • @dralzgamer2354
    @dralzgamer2354 7 месяцев назад +1

    “Rarer” is a fancy term for less popular. Less demand, less supply. Easy as that

  • @Agent-vj3ns
    @Agent-vj3ns 8 месяцев назад +1

    My iced out Invicta Gladiator is better 👑

  • @tynchytemper9618
    @tynchytemper9618 Год назад +9

    Wouldn't be seen dead with a Sub with the cyclops

    • @Matt-uq3in
      @Matt-uq3in Год назад +3

      Spot on 👌

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 2 месяца назад

      The Cyclops is an iconic and immediately recognizable Rolex feature. A Rolex purchase is too big a financial commitment to be influenced by social media hipster dufus. These are the same dopes that will tell you a 34mm watch looks good on a 7.5 inch wrist because Muhammad Ali wore one. Try the them both on, if you like a visually smaller dial then go for Date as it has less negative space. If you don’t like the look of the Cyclops then you have a No-date option. If it’s going to be your only Sub, I’d get the Date complication for its utility and distinctive feature.

  • @sergim66
    @sergim66 9 месяцев назад +2

    124060, the best Sub!

    • @Maia.loves_moons
      @Maia.loves_moons 6 месяцев назад

      No way the 14060m is killer! I’ve had both including a Starbucks & the 14060m is just perfect!

  • @chrispalmer8038
    @chrispalmer8038 Год назад +2

    How much are you guys selling a no date for?

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад

      Which model are you interested in?

    • @chrispalmer8038
      @chrispalmer8038 Год назад

      A 1993 non ceramic no date 16610?

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад

      Please email sales@watchtrader.co.uk, head to our website or give us a call tomorrow and we can discuss. Thank you

  • @Mohamed_Elshekh
    @Mohamed_Elshekh Год назад

    Is that one available ? and please what serial is it M ,Y ,T ?

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад +1

      It belongs to a customers, however we have similar in stock

    • @Mohamed_Elshekh
      @Mohamed_Elshekh Год назад

      @@Watchtrader which serial is it

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад

      We have 2 16610’s (Submariner Date) 2008 and 2009

    • @Mohamed_Elshekh
      @Mohamed_Elshekh Год назад

      @@Watchtrader any no date ones 14060 ?

    • @Watchtrader
      @Watchtrader  Год назад +1

      Not in stock at this moment but we can source one for you quickly. Email sales@watchtrader.co.uk or call our shop tomorrow and we can discuss. Thank you

  • @haroldconner6265
    @haroldconner6265 Год назад +7

    No date no interest

  • @jesusavalos5548
    @jesusavalos5548 10 месяцев назад +1

    MOST people prefer the no date over the date.

    • @BIG2hats
      @BIG2hats 6 месяцев назад +1

      Most people don’t even know isn’t exists and it’s ugly af compared to the date version

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 2 месяца назад

      The Cyclops is an iconic and immediately recognizable Rolex feature. A Rolex purchase is too big a financial commitment to be influenced by social media hipster dufus. These are the same dopes that will tell you a 34mm watch looks good on a 7.5 inch wrist because Muhammad Ali wore one. Try the them both on, if you like a visually smaller dial then go for Date as it has less negative space. If you don’t like the look of the Cyclops then you have a No-date option. If it’s going to be your only Sub, I’d get the Date complication for its utility and distinctive feature.

  • @TheAgeRating
    @TheAgeRating Год назад

    6k lmaooo nah

  • @mauricedottore9807
    @mauricedottore9807 Год назад +1

    Sub rare 😅😅😅 145 on chrono 😂😂

  • @leethirling9913
    @leethirling9913 Год назад

    The watch at the bottom of video is a cheap copy 😂

    • @lettuce1305
      @lettuce1305 Год назад +1

      How?

    • @leethirling9913
      @leethirling9913 Год назад

      @lettuce1305 the pins to hold the watch to the strap are visible through the watch casing

    • @lettuce1305
      @lettuce1305 Год назад +2

      ​@@leethirling9913that's a 5 digit No date Sub ref 14060M. All 14060 or 14060M have drilled lugs on the case and pretty much almost all sports Rolex models had drilled lugs prior to 2003.