To anyone not speaking German, a brief summary of Gorings anwers: US prosecutor: After gaining power you immediately abolished parliamentarism in Germany Goring: It was no longer required, additionally we (NSDAP) were the strongest party in parliament at that time. US prosecutor: You (the nazi gvmt) also did not tolerate any opposition party or group threatening NSDAP policy Goring: You are quite correct, we had lived through opposition and suffered from opposition and it was time to abandon opposition and start rebuilding. US prosecutor: After you came to power you regarded it as necessary to suppress all opposition parties to retain power Goring: (audibly annoyed at getting virtually the same question again) Yes, we deemed it necessary to not have opposition. US prosecutor: You also held it necessary to suppress all individual opposition. Goring: If opposition seriously threatened the rebuilding work done by us (NSDAP), naturally it was not tolerated. US prosecutor: (line of questioning seems to be cut off, dunno what question Goring was answering) based on Gorings answer and the follow up question I presume its about persecution of individuals by state organs like the GESTAPO and SS Goring: Administrative organs were of course necessary, I dont understand what fight you are referring to (Neither do I frankly due to the cuts) US prosecutor: Well if you wanted someone killed you wouldnt have done it yourself but tasked someone else with it. Röhm (former SA leader killed in the night of long knives) was not killed by you either. Goring: Starts explaining that he had talked about the Röhm affair before and then the audio cuts off. Prosecutor speaking German: Funk (Reichsminister of the economy) had supreme control over the economies in the occupied terretories. Goring: I cant remember the details, the general orders came from me. Then he filibusters a bit and states that if and what orders Funk gave in his field of work to his subordinates he cant say for certain but all orders were based on his personal authority. Prosecutor: (weird cut removing first part of question, presumably on Hitlers involvement in foreign politics) ...the guidelines of all politics including and especially the foreign politics. Goring: Absolutely, especially the foreign policy was of particular interest to the Fuhrer. I want to say foreign politics and the leading of the Wehrmacht were the prime interests of the Fuhrer and his main area of work. Prosecutor: May I assume that he (Hitler) also directly involved himself in details of German foreign policy? Gohring: As stated before, he ( Hitler) was very much involved in the details of both areas (foreign policy and leading of the army) Due to his especially large... interest. (Goering makes an interesting small pause before saying interest, seemingly searching for the best term) Prosecutor: Did Hitler specifically forbid you from giving away the memorandum to Poland from the 30th of August 1939? (Presumably the Hossbach memorandum?) Gohring: He did not specifically forbid me to. I dont know whether he knew that I had it in my pocket. He did generally forbid it by specifically forbidding the person responsible, Herr von Ribbentrop (German foreign minister) from giving it to Poland. Which led to me, against the explicit wishes of the Fuhrer, giving it away which was a risk that , please dont misunderstand me, only I could have taken. (Honestly not sure what he and the prosecution are talking about but history experts, pls enlighten us) Prosecution: You spoke of the influence that individuals had on ... (cut off question again) Gohring: After the people have expressed, in many elections throughout the years, their desire to entrust their future and their trust to the Nazi leadership. Prosecution: You and others cooperated in concentrating all authority in Germany in the Fuhrer. Gohring: Did he (prosecutor) talk about me? In what way I have taken part in this? Prosecution: Is there anyone in the box who did not cooperate with this goal? Gohring: That noone from the accused on trial here today was in opposition to the Fuhrer is clear, I must say though that we have to differentiate between certain time periods since a lot of the questions addressed to me are very general and we are talking about a time period of 24-25 years. Also there were more goal oriented (zweckmaessig) measures to be taken for Germany. Prosecution: And yet because of the Fuhrer system you could give no warning to the German people or influence decision making or even resign. Gohring: Those are many questions at once, I would like to answer the first one first. The first question was, I believe, weather I saw no reason to tell the German people about this. (not sure what "this" refers to?) I personally had no responsibility and we were at war. Personal disagreements and differences in opinion (between Goring and the rest of the gvmt. presumably) could not be discussed in a public forum as we were at war and strategic decision making and unity was required. I dont think that ever happened in world history. Secondly, in regards to my resignation, I dont even want to discuss such a matter. We were at war, I was a soldier and an officer and differences in opinion or conviction did not matter. My only task was to serve my country as a soldier. Thirdly, it was not my job to tell a man (Hitler?) whom I have sworn an oath to that I am resigning every time he does not share my opinion or doesnt heed my advice. If I was a person like that I would not need to have joined the Nazi movement to begin with. Leaving the Fuhrer never occurred to me. Prosecution: (Question is cut, based on answer probably something like "when did you change your mind") Gohring: Relatively late, at a certain point I realized that the war was lost. Before that I hoped for a remis (Chess term for no winner and no loser. Presumably a sort of white peace with the allies). In January 1945 I saw no hope anymore. Prosecution: Was Hitlers policy not to never negotiate and did you not think that foreign powers would never negotiate while Hitler was in power? Gohring: I knew that enemy propaganda emphasized never to negotiate with Hitler. That Hitler never wanted to negotiate was known to me as well but not in this context. Hitler wanted to negotiate if negotiations would give him a way out. Hitler however under no circumstances wanted fruitless negotiations not yielding any results. Prosecution: Were there any robot attacks after January 1945? Gohring: This was not translated properly, I dont understand. ( Allies sometimes refferd to V1 and V2 rockets as "robots". Maybe question was weather V weapons were used after January 1945)
My Father served in the Army Corp of Engineer s during the Nuremberg clean up and was required to sit in at the trial s when off duty. Being of German heritage he was deeply effected by the people of this city and was proud to serve his country and the people of war torn Europe. The world is still healing even to this day.
The Germans are still enslaved by reparations to this day. Let that sink in. You owe it to yourself and your father to at least research & consider revisionist's stance such as David Cole , Germar Rudolf, Mark Weber, etc. David Cole is my favorite. A Jew, no less, and a good honest man & historian if there ever was one.
On a related note, I recall that Speer in his memoirs described Goering as a shell of his former self by the end of the war - morbidly obese, addicted to morphine, and out of touch with reality.
Mr. Speer repented timely and escaped death like Mr. Von Schirach the most vicious propagandist of the Nazi regime. So both were healthy and in total touch with reality.
@@tamar3218 Von Schirach hated the Americans during the show trials, as the best authority (Mr David Irving) has stated in his book on the show trials. This was despite his mother being American. The French, Americans, British and especially the Russians had some nerve "trying" these men for war crimes, "crimes against humanity" (made up after the fact) and crimes against peace.
How is cheating the hangman facing the music? He gets no points for not killing himself before getting captured--he was under the mistaken impression that he would be treated like a celebrity by the Americans. He was shocked when they snatched his bejeweled field marshal's baton out of his hand (it's in a glass case at West Point).
A pity we are not getting more video coverage here, as in the Eichmann trial.
4 года назад+3
The defendants were required to speak slowly to enable the interpreters to keep up and learn, as it were, "on the job" (simultaneous interpreting began at Nuremberg)
I can confirm that Herman Goering spoke English. My grandfather was a guard at Nuremberg and Goering himself asked him to explain his rank on his arm band
it seems to me that göring said some very powerful things at his trial. even today, were only allowed to listen what the americans said. the german voices are always garbled, and have so many glitches - you can hardly find a single sentence which is complete.
He says that even before he became convinced the war was lost he hoped for an agreed end to it. He uses the word Remis, as in when chess players agree to a draw.
Sure....only problem is they declared a war of extermination against the Soviet Union and tried to do just that. Nazi fuckers are lucky they still have a country. Dumb fucks. If not for D Day Germany would have and should have been part of the Soviet Union.
you would think that hidden some wherein ab archive there is pristine footage of this. there is color footage of all this, of which bits and pieces can be found...
@@johnbaxter3676 Goering in the beginning at least was given the opportunity to not directly answer all questions. At some point they switched though and Jackson had gotten in under control from then on
I’m fluent in German, this recording was heavily edited and Göring‘s remarks were truncated and butchered by the editing or incompleteness of the recording. The entire concept of a War Trial of a defeated Nation is absurd. The Leadership of a Nation is obligated to be Victorious in War, a conquered people are not Criminal, they are simply Defeated. In War, the Means always Justify the Ends for any Combatant.
Probably, Americans love their secrets. But no, the Nazi government were even horrible to their own people, sending them to their deaths and feeding lies. Either way, all founders of party should have at least been thrown into jail forever.
@@canadious6933 Its no secret that senior nazis had safe passage to S America; Mengele and Eichmann, who was later tried and hung in Israel, all passages funded by the catholic church. There were 10,000 SS guards at Auschwitz, of whom only 200+ plus were tried, and just a few found guilty. Other outstanding cases were tried in Germany by judges made up of former gestapo, and guess what, many were let off with light sentences.. The yanks did poach many top scientists to work in the states.
Genocide, regardless of any perceived war crimes, was surely enough to throw the book at the leading Nazis. Goering would clearly have been aware of Hitler’s intention to destroy ‘European Jewry’. Such an abominable distraction to typical war abuses, given Goering’s rank as Reichsmarshal is sufficiently damning in my view. The Holocaust is the crux of the matter. Without it, Goering is simply on the losing side. With it, he deserves his fate.
1945 Nuremberg trial gave nothing to the humanity but the arrogant display of revange by the victorious countries. When it comes to the crime against humanity,what the British Govt.did in the colonies in India,Africa,and Asian countries?
I agree, but those guys needed to be punished for their deliberate and systematic murder of millions of people. The survivors, and the families of the survivors received justice. True, the British government was responsible for many crimes, but I don’t believe they established extermination camps like treblinka or auschwitz. Saying that, I do understand your point of view my friend. Maybe the real lesson here, is to treat your fellow man with respect and dignity regardless of their race, color or creed.
Yea they were trying to limit the nazis from spreading their bullshit to ignorant easily manipulated loosers like the sympethizers such as yourself. They say as much in this video. They just saved the world from an evil empire, forgive them from taking precautions.
How credible was the evidence used at Nuremberg? An American judge, Edward L. Van Roden, was appointed by the US Army to a commission set up to investigate the treatment of prisoners at the Nurumberg trials. He reported that: 1. "all but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operation procedure with our American investigators." 2. "Torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners' fingernails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near-starvation rations. The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four, and five months . . . 3. "the investigators would put a black hood over the head of the accused and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses . . . 4. "Low rank prisoners were assured that convictions were being sought only against higher ranking officers, and they had absolutely nothing to lose by co-operating and making the desired statements. Such 'evidence' was then used against them - when they joined their superiors in the dock. The latter were told on the other hand that by 'confession', they would take all responsibility onto their own shoulders, thus shielding their men from trial." 5. "A favorite stratagem, when a prisoner refused to co-operate, was to arrange a mock trial. In these, death sentences were passed, then offers of a 'reprieve' if he confessed. Sometimes a prisoner would be threatened with being handed over to the Russians, his family deprived of their ration cards - or worse." Colonel A.H Rosenfeld decided the admissibility of evidence at Nurumberg. When he was asked about these sham trials, he replied: "Yes, of course. We couldn't have made these birds talk otherwise. . . it was a trick and it worked like a charm."
The "more evil" side won ww2 and they got to do whatever they wanted with the world. Like descend it into the cold war and proto-globalist pet projects. My country fought side by side with those defendants of the Nuremberg trials and against the red plague of the east and i couldn't be more proud about that. The whole trial was about retrospective victor's justice, which makes it as illegitimate as it can get. Germany didn't break any existing international laws so they had to make some up for the illegitimate tribunal of vengeance post-war.
@Incerthose A. IntoBee my country wasn't another dictatorship supported by the "big bad nazis" but a democracy which was under the constant imperialist threat of the Soviet union. We shared about 1300 kilometres of border with them and we still share it today with Putin's Russia. What would you expect us to do if that country decides to invade? Oh yeah they tried though. Twice at that. The allies weren't willing to help us and even if they did, we would have ended up the way Poland did. Only with a bit less steamrolling and more genocides and deportations either to the forests of Katyn or to the gulags to die off in further east. You really don't know anything do you?
@Incerthose A. IntoBee you just shows how ignorant you pro-allied sycophants are on your high horse. Because of people like you i despise the US as you yourselves prove over and over again that the wrong side won and that you don't know about the Russian character or the nature of communism for thar matter. Have fun with the wokies, Antifa and BLM. That's what you fought for.
@@petervonhoven4401 I'm aware that my country's foreign policy has been awful at times, but you've got to be kidding if you think there's any comparison between that and the Nazi's disgusting, murderous rampage. Thirty million dead in less than a decade--THAT is their legacy. If you're German and you're defending that in any way, then you're a loser.
6 лет назад+1
Just a point the NUREMBERG trials were not a "United States of America tribunal" but a tribunal produced and authorised by the three most powerful allies UK, Russia, USA.
Around 04:20 - 'The Affaire Röhm'. Göring states that he already explained but wants to repeat his statement. At that point the narrator of this video cuts the film to leave Görings statement out. I would say that cutting out such a imported fragment is a violation against liberty, democracy and freedom of speech! Please upload the official fragment so the viewer can make up his own mind. Otherwise this all smells really like Socialism and Facism.
Thank you for uploading...history shouldn't be written by the victor Goering was a fine man and devoted to his country and his animals, just because he was eventually on the 'losing' side he was deemed evil...a fine person lost from us
Somebody explain to me the "robot attacks" question at the end, please. If not, I'll just assume it was sarcasm. I don't believe there were any robot attacks, although that would have been awesome.
@@donaldsmalleypublishing401 Well, to be fair, it's really not the obvious answer. Even in hindsight I can kind of see how they got there but it's still a weird name
I am not going to get into Goering or any other Nazi's guilt. First of all what those guys did was extreme at the very least. While a great deal of mythology has been built up over the past 70 years by the victors - the US and British in particular - the bottom line is that atrocities were committed. Nevertheless this was a kangaroo court. The outcome for all but a handful of the defendants had already been decided. In a more just legal process Ribbentrop and Streicher would not have been hanged. Meanwhile Speer may have been.
I would hardly compare the Nuremberg trials to that farce of "trials" that Hitler used to kill all of those innocent officers, let alone all of the people that the Nazis massacred without any trial at all. You need to read up on your law and history - badly - if I actually have to point this out to you.
Stop moving the goalposts. The Nuremberg trials were a farce, the Nazis ones even more so but that doesn't make the Nuremberg ones ok. I'm not saying the results should have been different, the people tried were mostly war criminals. Also what "innocent officers" afaik Hitler never did Stalin like purges, his major ones were killing off the SA and killing the July plotters.
How have I moved the goalposts? How were they a farce? And again, what about all of the millions and millions of people that the Nazis killed without any trial at all? Is that a "goalpost"?
He was but got hooked on morphine after he was injured in the Beer Hall Putsch. He was high all the time from then until he was captured at the end of the war. He went cold turkey in jail and his sharp mind came back and gave the prosecution a few difficulties since he was very clever. Guilty, however, let there be no mistake.
During the exile years, he was the most addicted and at his worst, financially and psychologically. He was even interred in a mental hospital. After '33 he had power and fortune and his addiction toned down only to be blown again since the outbreak of the war to which he was opposed. A press article in February 1940 names him as a vocal and quite public opposition figure within the NSDAP. Most people in and out of Germany, including the US administration, expected him to take over and lead a more moderate NSDAP towards a settled peaceful ending of the war. His reluctance to openly clash with Hitler and his spiraling addiction however, led him to become a gradual recluse and in total denial with what was going on. Probably he knew about the death camps, probably didnt give a damn, though he must have been an anti-semite by opportunism more than conviction (unlike Goebbels, whom he despised, and Himmler/Heydrich, whom he distrusted). During his imprisonment he got off drugs though it was not cold turkey and not his choice, but that of his jailers. This backfired however, since getting off drugs brought back his long-gone sharpness and coldness, which he applied to the trial, not to save his life but to re-affirm his position as Hitler's successor (politically as well as ideologically), a position shaken by Hitler's scathing dismissal after the famous telegram of April '45, and to attain some kind of legacy for the german people who were listening to the trial over the radio. The witness stand provided an open forum and he made good use for his case, while undeniably winning the chess game of the cross-examination with Jackson, whose spirits went downhill afterwards. He spouted a line to the other defendants, held contempt for Speer, and when the firing squad execution was denied to him, he opted out by committing suicide. This being said, genius or not, he was a calculating man, opportunist, cold, with little or no empathy for anyone whom he considered an obstacle to his path --- he had probably more contempt for many members of Hitler's inner circle than the thousands of "nameless" victims that perished in the death camps and in the battlefields because he chose to align with Hitler for personal profit and little ideological or humanitarian concern indeed. Most probably, the morphine had rendered him a sociopath, a complicated, smart, but cunning, cold, lethal man.
he didnt go cold turkey in jail. The american and german doctors gave him 40 pills a day and weened him down to an almost clean state, but he killed himself.
Wo gibt es die kompletten Tonspuren des Prozesses mit Hermann Göring? Das ist ja nix was ihr da habt... Will wissen wie er vom Anwalt fertig gemacht wurde.
@@michaelwhisman7623 Goering was not forced into anything. He could have faded into obscurity back in the early days of the party. He didn't have to be one of Hitler's top henchmen. I have no idea what you are screaming about.
The show must go on! Was it about punishing the high ups in the nazis party or to cover the tracks of the western powers on how much they supported Nazis in 1930 onwards.
Has anybody noticed just how many WW2 videos on youtube have dropped sound at key opportune moments? You probably think the web isnt censored in your country, well I have a shock for you, check out a channel called Dennis Wise and I bet you can't watch most of the videos
ich geb ja zu, ich warte den ganzen tag darauf, daß auf einmal william wallace mit meinem handtuch mit herrn gauland vor der kanzel kollidiert und mareen aus dem hintergrund miauend fragt ob jemand ihren kater gesehen hätte , ...
Uuuhhh, I would like to order 3 cheeseburgers, 2 quarters pounder, and 2 big fries. Uuh, let's me pick my nose. 2 apple pies, 3 sundaes, 20 mcchickennuggets, and a large Diet Coke. And now give me my food.
just because we're all guilty and capable of evil doesn't mean we shouldn't keep fighting it.....no trial is completely "fair".....things changed when the videos started rolling in....
I was wondering about the protocol of this historic trial. For instance, why were the other 'defendants' allowed to listen in on the cross examinations of their Nazi brethren? For that matter, why were they all in the courtroom together at all?
Their crimes were related. Also, as often the defendants, admittedly, acted in agreement on multiple occasions, it could serve their defense to listen to the allegations made during the trials of their co-defendants.
It proved the right method. Many would stand against one another during interrogation (sentences were postponed to the end of all trials especially because of this, so one's defense could use the allegation of another defendant in its favor).
Este juicio fué una pantomima ya que estaban condenados de antemano , así que todo un buen paripé de los maravillosos vencedores que quisieron demostrar la humanidad de la cual carecen .
Who chose the photography equipment for this trial? Every copy I have ever seen is so bad you cannot really make out who the person in the box is. It could be Goering, maybe not. Worst coverage of a major trial ever. I can take a better picture with a kids toy. And why can't you get the coverage of the whole trial? I can get high res. of war footage, but not this trial. It smacks of fake.
WATCHING A FEW GORING STORIES ON YOU TUBE, IT WAS A SHAME THAT HE WENT TO THE DARK SIDE POLITICLY!! HE COULD HAVE BEEN QUITE A GREAT LEADER IN THE DEVELOPING AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY!
HE WASNT BLESSED BY GOD IT WAS SATAN ALL THE LEADERS COMMITED SUISIDE LIKE THE COWARDS THEY WERE INSTEAD OF DYINF IN COMBAT LIKE THEY COMMANDED THE COMMON SOLDIERS TO DO. AND THESE PIGS ARE YOUR HEROES SAD FUCKIN SAD NO HONOR
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
To anyone not speaking German, a brief summary of Gorings anwers:
US prosecutor: After gaining power you immediately abolished parliamentarism in Germany
Goring: It was no longer required, additionally we (NSDAP) were the strongest party in parliament at that time.
US prosecutor: You (the nazi gvmt) also did not tolerate any opposition party or group threatening NSDAP policy
Goring: You are quite correct, we had lived through opposition and suffered from opposition and it was time to abandon opposition and start rebuilding.
US prosecutor: After you came to power you regarded it as necessary to suppress all opposition parties to retain power
Goring: (audibly annoyed at getting virtually the same question again) Yes, we deemed it necessary to not have opposition.
US prosecutor: You also held it necessary to suppress all individual opposition.
Goring: If opposition seriously threatened the rebuilding work done by us (NSDAP), naturally it was not tolerated.
US prosecutor: (line of questioning seems to be cut off, dunno what question Goring was answering) based on Gorings answer and the follow up question I presume its about persecution of individuals by state organs like the GESTAPO and SS
Goring: Administrative organs were of course necessary, I dont understand what fight you are referring to (Neither do I frankly due to the cuts)
US prosecutor: Well if you wanted someone killed you wouldnt have done it yourself but tasked someone else with it. Röhm (former SA leader killed in the night of long knives) was not killed by you either.
Goring: Starts explaining that he had talked about the Röhm affair before and then the audio cuts off.
Prosecutor speaking German: Funk (Reichsminister of the economy) had supreme control over the economies in the occupied terretories.
Goring: I cant remember the details, the general orders came from me. Then he filibusters a bit and states that if and what orders Funk gave in his field of work to his subordinates he cant say for certain but all orders were based on his personal authority.
Prosecutor: (weird cut removing first part of question, presumably on Hitlers involvement in foreign politics) ...the guidelines of all politics including and especially the foreign politics.
Goring: Absolutely, especially the foreign policy was of particular interest to the Fuhrer. I want to say foreign politics and the leading of the Wehrmacht were the prime interests of the Fuhrer and his main area of work.
Prosecutor: May I assume that he (Hitler) also directly involved himself in details of German foreign policy?
Gohring: As stated before, he ( Hitler) was very much involved in the details of both areas (foreign policy and leading of the army) Due to his especially large... interest. (Goering makes an interesting small pause before saying interest, seemingly searching for the best term)
Prosecutor: Did Hitler specifically forbid you from giving away the memorandum to Poland from the 30th of August 1939? (Presumably the Hossbach memorandum?)
Gohring: He did not specifically forbid me to. I dont know whether he knew that I had it in my pocket. He did generally forbid it by specifically forbidding the person responsible, Herr von Ribbentrop (German foreign minister) from giving it to Poland. Which led to me, against the explicit wishes of the Fuhrer, giving it away which was a risk that , please dont misunderstand me, only I could have taken. (Honestly not sure what he and the prosecution are talking about but history experts, pls enlighten us)
Prosecution: You spoke of the influence that individuals had on ... (cut off question again)
Gohring: After the people have expressed, in many elections throughout the years, their desire to entrust their future and their trust to the Nazi leadership.
Prosecution: You and others cooperated in concentrating all authority in Germany in the Fuhrer.
Gohring: Did he (prosecutor) talk about me? In what way I have taken part in this?
Prosecution: Is there anyone in the box who did not cooperate with this goal?
Gohring: That noone from the accused on trial here today was in opposition to the Fuhrer is clear, I must say though that we have to differentiate between certain time periods since a lot of the questions addressed to me are very general and we are talking about a time period of 24-25 years. Also there were more goal oriented (zweckmaessig) measures to be taken for Germany.
Prosecution: And yet because of the Fuhrer system you could give no warning to the German people or influence decision making or even resign.
Gohring: Those are many questions at once, I would like to answer the first one first. The first question was, I believe, weather I saw no reason to tell the German people about this. (not sure what "this" refers to?) I personally had no responsibility and we were at war. Personal disagreements and differences in opinion (between Goring and the rest of the gvmt. presumably) could not be discussed in a public forum as we were at war and strategic decision making and unity was required. I dont think that ever happened in world history. Secondly, in regards to my resignation, I dont even want to discuss such a matter. We were at war, I was a soldier and an officer and differences in opinion or conviction did not matter. My only task was to serve my country as a soldier. Thirdly, it was not my job to tell a man (Hitler?) whom I have sworn an oath to that I am resigning every time he does not share my opinion or doesnt heed my advice. If I was a person like that I would not need to have joined the Nazi movement to begin with. Leaving the Fuhrer never occurred to me.
Prosecution: (Question is cut, based on answer probably something like "when did you change your mind")
Gohring: Relatively late, at a certain point I realized that the war was lost. Before that I hoped for a remis (Chess term for no winner and no loser. Presumably a sort of white peace with the allies). In January 1945 I saw no hope anymore.
Prosecution: Was Hitlers policy not to never negotiate and did you not think that foreign powers would never negotiate while Hitler was in power?
Gohring: I knew that enemy propaganda emphasized never to negotiate with Hitler. That Hitler never wanted to negotiate was known to me as well but not in this context. Hitler wanted to negotiate if negotiations would give him a way out. Hitler however under no circumstances wanted fruitless negotiations not yielding any results.
Prosecution: Were there any robot attacks after January 1945?
Gohring: This was not translated properly, I dont understand.
( Allies sometimes refferd to V1 and V2 rockets as "robots". Maybe question was weather V weapons were used after January 1945)
thank u!
Thanks 👍
Thank you!!
Thank you.
Thanks a lot... god I hate when there arent subtitles
this took place almost 75 years ago now.
No shit Sherlock
Not even that long ago
No it's taking place right now
meanwhile in aushwitz they're building gas chambers haha
My Father served in the Army Corp of Engineer s during the Nuremberg clean up and was required to sit in at the trial s when off duty. Being of German heritage he was deeply effected by the people of this city and was proud to serve his country and the people of war torn Europe. The world is still healing even to this day.
The Germans are still enslaved by reparations to this day.
Let that sink in.
You owe it to yourself and your father to at least research & consider revisionist's stance such as David Cole , Germar Rudolf, Mark Weber, etc.
David Cole is my favorite. A Jew, no less, and a good honest man & historian if there ever was one.
"its not fair that goering can talk" -The prosecutor
20:30 what are Robot-attacks? There were no robots back in 1945.
@@__Mr.White__ Well that’s because there were no robot attacks after 1945. Every one knows that.
@@sirgalahad1376 What about the brasilian robot wars from 1978 to 1981?
@@__Mr.White__ V1 rockets
@@__Mr.White__Cite your sources that they didn’t exist in ‘45.
It was well known, Goering was a baller on the Nuremberg inmate basketball team
David Joseph he was fat as a house
Before he was fat
I think this whole process was just for show. They already had the verdicts.
yes absolutly and they have tortured them to say and subscribe what they would hear
and to subscriped what they would
symbols matter
Even strong democracy can be bent by wrongfull manipulater, a good dictater is better than democracy
@@avinashkachare2482 but only a realy good dictater
On a related note, I recall that Speer in his memoirs described Goering as a shell of his former self by the end of the war - morbidly obese, addicted to morphine, and out of touch with reality.
He was indeed but by the end of the trial he was off morphine, had lost weight and was looking very much like the WW1 hero he was remembered as being.
Mr. Speer repented timely and escaped death like Mr. Von Schirach the most vicious propagandist of the Nazi regime. So both were healthy and in total touch with reality.
I think Speer was one of two Nuremberg defendants to express remorse.
Speer was a traitor, that‘s why he wasn‘t sentenced to death as a NS leader.
@@tamar3218 Von Schirach hated the Americans during the show trials, as the best authority (Mr David Irving) has stated in his book on the show trials. This was despite his mother being American.
The French, Americans, British and especially the Russians had some nerve "trying" these men for war crimes, "crimes against humanity" (made up after the fact) and crimes against peace.
why does there seem to be audio cut off when goering is giving a answer on certain questions
i wondered, too after the second question. this is relevant for the collective and for history.
Great bit of history but why no translations of the answers? A bit like hearing 1/2 a conversation.
Then you're one up on me?
They probably thought we had headphones too....lol.
Lucillesgirl : I think I've enjoyed a better edjucation, I understand everything perfectly...
Imca vdB yes, what a wonderful "edjucation" you've had
Learn German
Goering makes Jackson look silly.
Atleast Goering faced the Music,unlike many of the others who should have been there.
He killed himself by cyanide 2 hours before he was to have been hanged.
Like every US President since 1945...
Goring died a coward pigging out on some cyanide.
How is cheating the hangman facing the music? He gets no points for not killing himself before getting captured--he was under the mistaken impression that he would be treated like a celebrity by the Americans. He was shocked when they snatched his bejeweled field marshal's baton out of his hand (it's in a glass case at West Point).
@@coryfice1881 he only did it because they didn't accepted His request to die by firing squad lol
Sadly worthless in this censored version...
A pity we are not getting more video coverage here, as in the Eichmann trial.
The defendants were required to speak slowly to enable the interpreters to keep up and learn, as it were, "on the job" (simultaneous interpreting began at Nuremberg)
Interesting info.
I can confirm that Herman Goering spoke English. My grandfather was a guard at Nuremberg and Goering himself asked him to explain his rank on his arm band
it seems to me that göring said some very powerful things at his trial. even today, were only allowed to listen what the americans said. the german voices are always garbled, and have so many glitches - you can hardly find a single sentence which is complete.
So he invented whataboutism. Thats great, hope he burns in hell btw.
whitey 1 Well Thats Whataboutism
@@nickliba5819 lol
He says that even before he became convinced the war was lost he hoped for an agreed end to it. He uses the word Remis, as in when chess players agree to a draw.
Sure....only problem is they declared a war of extermination against the Soviet Union and tried to do just that.
Nazi fuckers are lucky they still have a country. Dumb fucks.
If not for D Day Germany would have and should have been part of the Soviet Union.
you would think that hidden some wherein ab archive there is pristine footage of this. there is color footage of all this, of which bits and pieces can be found...
Goering played with Jackson;
Please--Jackson was a brilliant jurist who rose to the top without a law degree. Goering's bullshit wasn't fooling anyone, least of all Jackson.
@@johnbaxter3676 Goering in the beginning at least was given the opportunity to not directly answer all questions. At some point they switched though and Jackson had gotten in under control from then on
Learning German.. and it sucks only being able to understand a few words lmao
Taylor TM I don't speak German but I'm sure he's blaming it all on Hitler
you are wrong
2bad 85 wrong
Astrid Wagner its not easy
Team Antiislam relax I was being sarcastic
I’m fluent in German, this recording was heavily edited
and Göring‘s remarks were
truncated and butchered by the editing or incompleteness
of the recording. The entire concept of a War Trial of a defeated Nation is absurd.
The Leadership of a Nation
is obligated to be Victorious
in War, a conquered people are
not Criminal, they are simply Defeated. In War, the Means always Justify the Ends for any Combatant.
Man hätte ihm vielleicht anbieten sollen, ihn entsprechend dem Volkgerichtshof nach Freisler-Art abzuurteilen. ;-) Das wäre sicher fairer gewesen. Lol
@@Philobert 'We were only following orders'...... and free passage to S America courtesy of the pope and his acolytes.
Probably, Americans love their secrets.
But no, the Nazi government were even horrible to their own people, sending them to their deaths and feeding lies. Either way, all founders of party should have at least been thrown into jail forever.
@@canadious6933 Its no secret that senior nazis had safe passage to S America; Mengele and Eichmann, who was later tried and hung in Israel, all passages funded by the catholic church. There were 10,000 SS guards at Auschwitz, of whom only 200+ plus were tried, and just a few found guilty. Other outstanding cases were tried in Germany by judges made up of former gestapo, and guess what, many were let off with light sentences.. The yanks did poach many top scientists to work in the states.
Genocide, regardless of any perceived war crimes, was surely enough to throw the book at the leading Nazis. Goering would clearly have been aware of Hitler’s intention to destroy ‘European Jewry’. Such an abominable distraction to typical war abuses, given Goering’s rank as Reichsmarshal is sufficiently damning in my view. The Holocaust is the crux of the matter. Without it, Goering is simply on the losing side. With it, he deserves his fate.
1945 Nuremberg trial gave nothing to the humanity but the arrogant display of revange by the victorious countries.
When it comes to the crime against humanity,what the British Govt.did in the colonies in India,Africa,and Asian countries?
I agree, but those guys needed to be punished for their deliberate and systematic murder of millions of people. The survivors, and the families of the survivors received justice. True, the British government was responsible for many crimes, but I don’t believe they established extermination camps like treblinka or auschwitz. Saying that, I do understand your point of view my friend. Maybe the real lesson here, is to treat your fellow man with respect and dignity regardless of their race, color or creed.
True
Trial of revenge not justice, Goering was to good for Jackson.
Don't you just love the cut out parts lol
Yea they were trying to limit the nazis from spreading their bullshit to ignorant easily manipulated loosers like the sympethizers such as yourself. They say as much in this video. They just saved the world from an evil empire, forgive them from taking precautions.
@@Starburst7641 ok bigbrain. You must be immune to selfreflection...jeez.
Translation of Goerings answers would have been nice.
It would be nice if you would learn German.
Michael Whisman I’m sorry if that offended you. You’re quite right. Learning German would be good.
Why am I watching this? I don’t understand a word they saying
You don't understand English??
Fascination
Translation in English: law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/goering1.html
Show Trial by the words of the prosecution.
How credible was the evidence used at Nuremberg? An American judge, Edward L. Van Roden, was appointed by the US Army to a commission set up to investigate the treatment of prisoners at the Nurumberg trials. He reported that:
1. "all but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operation procedure with our American investigators."
2. "Torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners' fingernails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near-starvation rations. The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four, and five months . . .
3. "the investigators would put a black hood over the head of the accused and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses . . .
4. "Low rank prisoners were assured that convictions were being sought only against higher ranking officers, and they had absolutely nothing to lose by co-operating and making the desired statements. Such 'evidence' was then used against them - when they joined their superiors in the dock. The latter were told on the other hand that by 'confession', they would take all responsibility onto their own shoulders, thus shielding their men from trial."
5. "A favorite stratagem, when a prisoner refused to co-operate, was to arrange a mock trial. In these, death sentences were passed, then offers of a 'reprieve' if he confessed. Sometimes a prisoner would be threatened with being handed over to the Russians, his family deprived of their ration cards - or worse."
Colonel A.H Rosenfeld decided the admissibility of evidence at Nurumberg. When he was asked about these sham trials, he replied:
"Yes, of course. We couldn't have made these birds talk otherwise. . . it was a trick and it worked like a charm."
The "more evil" side won ww2 and they got to do whatever they wanted with the world.
Like descend it into the cold war and proto-globalist pet projects.
My country fought side
by side with those defendants of the Nuremberg trials and against the red plague of the east and i couldn't be more proud about that.
The whole trial was about retrospective victor's justice, which makes it as illegitimate as it can get.
Germany didn't break any existing international laws so they had to make some up for the illegitimate tribunal of vengeance post-war.
You do realise that those statements have nothing to do with the nuremberg trials, right ? He was talking about the malmedy trial in Dachau
Was he?... Evidence!... Shared on Google+
@Incerthose A. IntoBee my country wasn't another dictatorship supported by the "big bad nazis" but a democracy which was under the constant imperialist threat of the Soviet union.
We shared about 1300 kilometres of border with them and we still share it today with Putin's Russia.
What would you expect us to do if that country decides to invade? Oh yeah they tried though. Twice at that.
The allies weren't willing to help us and even if they did, we would have ended up the way Poland did.
Only with a bit less steamrolling and more genocides and deportations either to the forests of Katyn or to the gulags to die off in further east. You really don't know anything do you?
@Incerthose A. IntoBee you
just shows how ignorant you pro-allied sycophants are on your high horse. Because of people like you i despise the US as you yourselves prove over and over again that the wrong side won and that you don't know about the Russian character or the nature of communism for thar matter.
Have fun with the wokies, Antifa and BLM. That's what you fought for.
If victor over vanquished then it is always a tribunal of revenge.
So what? After what the Nazis did to half the planet, they're lucky we didn't wipe Germany off the map.
@@johnbaxter3676 Look at your own bloody story
@@petervonhoven4401 I'm aware that my country's foreign policy has been awful at times, but you've got to be kidding if you think there's any comparison between that and the Nazi's disgusting, murderous rampage. Thirty million dead in less than a decade--THAT is their legacy. If you're German and you're defending that in any way, then you're a loser.
Just a point the NUREMBERG trials were not a "United States of America tribunal" but a tribunal produced and authorised by the three most powerful allies UK, Russia, USA.
PUPPET TRIAL.
InterZIONational MILITARY COURT OF NUREMBERG.
Does anybody know where to find Goering's testimony in English?
law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Goering1.html
In David Irving's two books, "Nuremberg" and "Goering."
Ah fuck. No subtitles.
5:25 Is this Göring speaking english?
Yep
Moe Itani Lool your stupid , the person speaking is a native English speaker
@@unknownfrvr6767 - Although this is not Goering speaking, he could speak English fluently with very little German accent.
Unknown Frvr676 ich verstehen überhaupt night, warum Leute sich untereinander so verhandeln müssen. Leyte
😂
Around 04:20 - 'The Affaire Röhm'. Göring states that he already explained but wants to repeat his statement. At that point the narrator of this video cuts the film to leave Görings statement out.
I would say that cutting out such a imported fragment is a violation against liberty, democracy and freedom of speech!
Please upload the official fragment so the viewer can make up his own mind. Otherwise this all smells really like Socialism and Facism.
Thank you for uploading...history shouldn't be written by the victor Goering was a fine man and devoted to his country and his animals, just because he was eventually on the 'losing' side he was deemed evil...a fine person lost from us
Vanessa Hawarden rubbish
Philbyd 123 Ask any RAF pilot of the time about their high respect for their counterparts in the Luftwaffe
Vanessa Hawarden Well he certainly made sure he had a great art collection!
Herman Browndog His model railway layout was superb
Vanessa Hawarden Yes, actually, Goering may have been the greatest thief in history.
Goering got the better of Jackson in this cross-examination
I am Dutch and I can approximatelly understand 1/2, I have to listen good though.
Somebody explain to me the "robot attacks" question at the end, please. If not, I'll just assume it was sarcasm. I don't believe there were any robot attacks, although that would have been awesome.
V1s and/or V2s were at the time referred to as robots in the UK.
@@beavisbutt-headson3223 I want to thank you for answering my question. I should have known better.
@@donaldsmalleypublishing401 Well, to be fair, it's really not the obvious answer. Even in hindsight I can kind of see how they got there but it's still a weird name
The Terminator just came out. And the Germans put the T-3000 into service lol
HERMANN GÖRING - EIN EHRENHAFTER MANN !
Who is here in 2019 ???
Sie haben Mütterchen Russland verraten.
Survivors and relatives.
@@timothywilliams4089lol
Not the Nazi party
Dildos ask these questions
It's Nürnberg
The camera pans all over the room but where is Goering? And where are the English subtitles?
God bless men who have determination. The world will crumble.
Can someone please kindly translate?
Thank you in advance!
Ill do it. They ate adressing you personally. They are saying go fuck yourself
@@DrLoverLover varför så arg din idiot?
They say that they couldn't find Kurdistan
@@onetokatman7293 basically we are jealous of germans and their achievements and their way of fighting bolsheviks
Those that done Dresden sitting in judgement of others. Very disturbing.
I am not going to get into Goering or any other Nazi's guilt. First of all what those guys did was extreme at the very least. While a great deal of mythology has been built up over the past 70 years by the victors - the US and British in particular - the bottom line is that atrocities were committed. Nevertheless this was a kangaroo court. The outcome for all but a handful of the defendants had already been decided. In a more just legal process Ribbentrop and Streicher would not have been hanged. Meanwhile Speer may have been.
Julius Streicher was hanged for being in-charge of a Pro-Nazi Newspaper. In what justice system is that reason enough to execute someone?
Shut up
The Globalists won that war. The world owes Germany an apology. Please view "Europa the last battle".
Wow! Some of these comments are truly strange. People be crazy.
Just stop being brainwashed.
Histórico ! Sería excelente que se publiquen estos videos subtitulados en diversos idiomas.
The biggest puppet trial ever.
Oh, you mean Hitler's "trials" of the men who supposedly tried to assassinate him?
You uberkitties are pathetic.
One side being bad doesnt justify the other side being bad.
I would hardly compare the Nuremberg trials to that farce of "trials" that Hitler used to kill all of those innocent officers, let alone all of the people that the Nazis massacred without any trial at all. You need to read up on your law and history - badly - if I actually have to point this out to you.
Stop moving the goalposts. The Nuremberg trials were a farce, the Nazis ones even more so but that doesn't make the Nuremberg ones ok. I'm not saying the results should have been different, the people tried were mostly war criminals. Also what "innocent officers" afaik Hitler never did Stalin like purges, his major ones were killing off the SA and killing the July plotters.
How have I moved the goalposts? How were they a farce?
And again, what about all of the millions and millions of people that the Nazis killed without any trial at all? Is that a "goalpost"?
The BIG PROPAGANDA IN THIS WORLD .....iA USA , UK , FRANCE AND RUSIA ....BUT PEOPLE ARE TO BLINDE to see the truth....sleep well
This is America,, would like to hear the Awnsers , however I don't speak German ... Not many in America do ..
LIES OVER LIES................
“He is permitted to put his propaganda in, we will deal with it later “
20:30 what are Robot-attacks? There were no robots back in 1945.
I don't know but afterwards he said "Das ist nicht richtig übersetzt worden" which means "That hasn't been translated properly" 🤷♂️
FOR HISTORIC PURPOSES I GIVE IT A TU BUT AT 1ST I THOUGHT THE FILM WAS CUTTING GOERING VOICE
Seems a intelligent man
The psychologists that studied Goering at Nuremberg came to the conclusion that he was so intelligent they considered him a genius.
I think he scored a 138 on an IQ test administered by a US Army doctor or psychologist.
He was but got hooked on morphine after he was injured in the Beer Hall Putsch. He was high all the time from then until he was captured at the end of the war. He went cold turkey in jail and his sharp mind came back and gave the prosecution a few difficulties since he was very clever. Guilty, however, let there be no mistake.
During the exile years, he was the most addicted and at his worst, financially and psychologically. He was even interred in a mental hospital. After '33 he had power and fortune and his addiction toned down only to be blown again since the outbreak of the war to which he was opposed. A press article in February 1940 names him as a vocal and quite public opposition figure within the NSDAP. Most people in and out of Germany, including the US administration, expected him to take over and lead a more moderate NSDAP towards a settled peaceful ending of the war. His reluctance to openly clash with Hitler and his spiraling addiction however, led him to become a gradual recluse and in total denial with what was going on. Probably he knew about the death camps, probably didnt give a damn, though he must have been an anti-semite by opportunism more than conviction (unlike Goebbels, whom he despised, and Himmler/Heydrich, whom he distrusted). During his imprisonment he got off drugs though it was not cold turkey and not his choice, but that of his jailers. This backfired however, since getting off drugs brought back his long-gone sharpness and coldness, which he applied to the trial, not to save his life but to re-affirm his position as Hitler's successor (politically as well as ideologically), a position shaken by Hitler's scathing dismissal after the famous telegram of April '45, and to attain some kind of legacy for the german people who were listening to the trial over the radio. The witness stand provided an open forum and he made good use for his case, while undeniably winning the chess game of the cross-examination with Jackson, whose spirits went downhill afterwards. He spouted a line to the other defendants, held contempt for Speer, and when the firing squad execution was denied to him, he opted out by committing suicide. This being said, genius or not, he was a calculating man, opportunist, cold, with little or no empathy for anyone whom he considered an obstacle to his path --- he had probably more contempt for many members of Hitler's inner circle than the thousands of "nameless" victims that perished in the death camps and in the battlefields because he chose to align with Hitler for personal profit and little ideological or humanitarian concern indeed. Most probably, the morphine had rendered him a sociopath, a complicated, smart, but cunning, cold, lethal man.
he didnt go cold turkey in jail. The american and german doctors gave him 40 pills a day and weened him down to an almost clean state, but he killed himself.
The war criminals were treated much better than Julian Assange now a days. Democracy has stagnated
Partially translated why?
I think we never truly understand what exactly happened
P.s, youtube correction officers attackkkkkk
Watch the documentary "Europa the last battle" on bitchute!
It’s sad to see that great guy on enemy hands
The Nuremberg ( kangaroo court ) trails
How dare you!!!!!!!!
I just wish I knew German without the subtitles. Lol.
The very idea of Imperialism and policing the world, was discredit Ed by the Nazis......
A squeaky voice. I'm a little surprised.
Wo gibt es die kompletten Tonspuren des Prozesses mit Hermann Göring? Das ist ja nix was ihr da habt...
Will wissen wie er vom Anwalt fertig gemacht wurde.
Hahha US war criminals sounding nervous
Wow villeicht du will hast better Weltpower. Wow no. Your neighbors hate you
Let me translate: "I was only following orders!" lol
So Asshole, you would have told the Nazis to kiss your ass??
Actually it's "I and only I am to be held accountable for the actions done in my field of work."
@@michaelwhisman7623 Goering was not forced into anything. He could have faded into obscurity back in the early days of the party. He didn't have to be one of Hitler's top henchmen. I have no idea what you are screaming about.
@@spaceghost8995 He's screaming at you because how dare you mock a Nazi, you know? Lol
No that’s not what he said at All
Among us but old version
Lol
POV: You're scared to scroll down.
The show must go on! Was it about punishing the high ups in the nazis party or to cover the tracks of the western powers on how much they supported Nazis in 1930 onwards.
They supported both sides of the war, as usual.
censored material is allways nice to see
Wieso ist das nicht im ganzen und ist geschnitten!?
Has anybody noticed just how many WW2 videos on youtube have dropped sound at key opportune moments? You probably think the web isnt censored in your country, well I have a shock for you, check out a channel called Dennis Wise and I bet you can't watch most of the videos
The victors trial.
Warum ist so viel geschnitten 🤔
Would G have turned himself in if he knew he'd be killed?
need better english closed caption..no excuse....this not dark age..yet
Goering was a patriot and a great man. He deserves to be honored as a war hero. I want his face on Mount Rushmore!
AK 49er fuck that nazi bitch..
Goering was a shit. So are you!
Greg Stephenson fuck you
Hydra Nim piss off
Yeah he was sooo great, a real forward thinking compassionate member of the human race. Yawn
All men were created equal. No man is above the law.
Then why USA and UK did not hang stalin for killing innocent people in "GULAGS"?
ich geb ja zu, ich warte den ganzen tag darauf, daß auf einmal william wallace mit meinem handtuch mit herrn gauland vor der kanzel kollidiert und mareen aus dem hintergrund miauend fragt ob jemand ihren kater gesehen hätte , ...
Uuuhhh, I would like to order 3 cheeseburgers, 2 quarters pounder, and 2 big fries. Uuh, let's me pick my nose. 2 apple pies, 3 sundaes, 20 mcchickennuggets, and a large Diet Coke. And now give me my food.
just because we're all guilty and capable of evil doesn't mean we shouldn't keep fighting it.....no trial is completely "fair".....things changed when the videos started rolling in....
Nothing to do with fighting "evil"
I was wondering about the protocol of this historic trial. For instance, why were the other 'defendants' allowed to listen in on the cross examinations of their Nazi brethren? For that matter, why were they all in the courtroom together at all?
Their crimes were related. Also, as often the defendants, admittedly, acted in agreement on multiple occasions, it could serve their defense to listen to the allegations made during the trials of their co-defendants.
It proved the right method. Many would stand against one another during interrogation (sentences were postponed to the end of all trials especially because of this, so one's defense could use the allegation of another defendant in its favor).
Este juicio fué una pantomima ya que estaban condenados de antemano , así que todo un buen paripé de los maravillosos vencedores que quisieron demostrar la humanidad de la cual carecen .
Who chose the photography equipment for this trial? Every copy I have ever seen is so bad you cannot really make out who the person in the box is. It could be Goering, maybe not. Worst coverage of a major trial ever. I can take a better picture with a kids toy. And why can't you get the coverage of the whole trial? I can get high res. of war footage, but not this trial. It smacks of fake.
WATCHING A FEW GORING STORIES ON YOU TUBE, IT WAS A SHAME THAT HE WENT TO THE DARK SIDE POLITICLY!!
HE COULD HAVE BEEN QUITE A GREAT LEADER IN THE DEVELOPING AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY!
Onde acho este vídeos em português
Where are the subtitles?
in your german schoolbook
ارجو الترجمه
تعلّم الماني وستتمكن من ترجمته
"Would be that our United defense is "Lick my ass!"
-Hermann Goring
Rest well, great soldier.
Feigling Meier.
I like him not for his crimes but for his comical behaviour.
A big Show, a Shane
Censorship of all opposition, sound familiar?
goering could speak english.
There was an interpreter.
but he was fluent in English
@@hywel4605 Never heard him speak fluent English. They were trying to communicate with him, but why? Should've been hanged immediately.
Let me translate, we want revenge and hold this kangaroo court for a publicity stunt. RIP Brave soldiers.
you must be a dumbass
@@r3rd698 He's not. The matrix has many many minds. His is not one of them.
God bless Hermann Goering defiant to the end God bless him...!
HE WASNT BLESSED BY GOD IT WAS SATAN ALL THE LEADERS COMMITED SUISIDE LIKE THE COWARDS THEY WERE INSTEAD OF DYINF IN COMBAT LIKE THEY COMMANDED THE COMMON SOLDIERS TO DO. AND THESE PIGS ARE YOUR HEROES SAD FUCKIN SAD NO HONOR
🇩🇪🇩🇪🙏🇩🇪🇩🇪🙏🙏🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪