This guy has probably been watching Marc Stevens' pseudo-law videos. One of his tenets is to constantly ask the judge stupid, irrelevant and ridiculous questions and ask them over and over and over. Fortunately, this judge ain't having it. And the 30 days in jail definitely cooled this SovCit's jets.
Absolutely. Stevens is the source of most pseudo-law (I _think_ @juangalt3496 would agree with this.) The relentless monomaniacal focus on "jurisdiction". But the real tell is the relentless questioning. The judge nailed it - "I'm not going to be cross-examined by you." And that's really the Stevens technique. It relies on the judge's need to hand-hold pro se defendants. Despite all the crap about "not treating you any differently than an attorney" of course they do. Stevens relies on this start peppering the judge with nonsensical questions. *As far as I can tell, the real goal is to get judges and prosecutors to throw out cases so they don't have to deal with these idiots.* Stevens is pretty dumb but he realizes that his "legal" theories don't mean shit in courtrooms and never and never will win. Ergo, the Pain-in-the-Ass technique. Sadly, sometimes this works. But less and less. More and more, judges are doing what this one did, "Shut up or go to jail." Stevens got busted by the AZ State Bar for practicing law without a license (or any sense). This also cooled _his_ jets. Tho this is difficult to police. He has a 1A right to spout his bullshit. Where it crosses the line into "practice" is another question and not an easy one to answer. @@streetleveltech
He’s the worst kind of Judge for sovereign citizens. He’s stern and most importantly, he knows EXACTLY what they’re doing. Both those combined are kryptonite to their bullshit.
@@BenjWarrant I get what you're saying but at least my understanding is that personal jurisdiction being waived is a civil law thing, with a criminal charge the crime has to be tried in the jurisdiction the actual crime occurred so the defendant's plea doesn't waive that requirement and it has to be proven at trial.
@@Vaelosh466 There's no such thing as 'personal jurisdiction', perhaps you mean something else? A court has jurisdiction over persons, areas, and issues. You can't "waive" jurisdiction, you have to challenge it, and that would be on the basis that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over you, or over the locus, or over the issue being tried. If you don't challenge jurisdiction at the earliest opportunity, you will probably be taken to have acknowledged jurisdiction and thereafter it will be impossible. In the US, it can certainly be an issue in criminal justice - e.g. 'this is a Michigan court but this was a federal offence', or vice versa; also 'this is a Michigan court but I'm from Wisconsin', that sort of thing.
@@BenjWarrant that's all well and good but if I'm travelling as the vessel that is the agent for the being of myself under Admiralty law the only people who have personal jurisdiction over me are mental health workers! 😉 😂
These nuts think that its all in a word play game and that you can find a loophole if you use a better word than the other side; They are all very very ignorant people lacking in even a basic education and hate to say it but the judges need to force the lawyer on them; All of them are getting state or FED disability So the Judge should look into making them wards of the state;
Actually that was the contention of the Judge. He instructed the defendant that he could not represent himself AND retain his rights to an attorney too. So, in order to have any self-representation rights, the Judge had decided the defendant had to give up his rights to counsel of an attorney. Though most attorneys apparently would flat out refuse to provide advise or counsel before a court, if the defendant is claiming sovereign citizen status.
@@johnschmitt571that's not what the judge said. You have the right to remain silent, and you also have the right to testify at trial. You can't do both at the same time. That's just a logical fact. Same as the logi sl fact that the judge stated here; you have a right to representation of counsel, and you have the right to represent yourself, but you can't do both at the same time.
"If I say 'understand', I'll be bound to their damn contract!! I guess I'll have to say 'comprehend' in order to duck and roll out of this." If he had an IQ over 75, he'd know both words mean the same exact thing 😂.
Nathalielawyerchick once did a video where a lawyer was defending herself. The video showcased one of the key reasons of why it was a bad idea - the lady got too passionate aboit her own case and ended up acting like a 5 yrs old child towards the end. Iirc she had messed up at some lawyer stuff and was put on probation, then she violated the probation. Then in court she argued that since the original case already destroyed her career, she had been punished enough. Implying it gave her a free pass at violating her probation. Judge didn't see it that way and gave her one year of jail. I can't recall whether it was actual jail or deferred with a minimal time to serve, but either way the lady was her own worst enemy for deciding to represent herself...
I’m a disabled Police Officer I wish when I was serving I had him for a judge. His manner of talking calmly and articulating and disarming the defendant is textbook but he has that lt about his courtroom demeanor. Great Job your Honor!
I appreciate the shout-out, brother! You must've hopped on right away. Cheboygan is in Northern Michigan. Judge Gauther presides over both Presque Isle and Cheboygan County. I can't wait to see how he handles the next few docket calls. February 6th, at 9am will be epic. I really hope that the judge agreeing to the amendment of his bond stipulations gets to Trevor's head so we can bust out the popcorn and watch the circus show. It's funny how he thought he was a genius by avoiding using the word "understand" but that he "comprehends" the charges instead. Comprehend means the exact same thing as understand 🤣. Mind you this dude is almost 49 years old!!
Where we live, a watercraft violation also appears in and affects your Driving Privilege, and is very serious violation. The fines are astounding and the consequences are such one would be an absolute fool to self represent.
I like that this judge uses "comprehend" instead of understand, so that this clown can't keep playing Sov--Cit semantics about not standing under, etc. These clowns infuriate me, however.
It makes me want to scream when Sov Cits create nonsensical definitions of words. The misuse of proper english is a punishable offense in my family. Understand- perceive the intended meaning of (words, a language or a speaker). Ahhhhhhh!!!!
The passiveness in which this judge, without the defendant “comprehending” is amazing. I do wish that he would’ve been much more stern and no bs, but it does seem like he was having a bit of fun so drastically explaining how the court works. May the gods bless his soul.
Did a sov cit just admit to giving up a right.. the whole legal argument of sov cits in court is to not give up their rights.. bravo judge for making him admit no one made him give up that right but himself
"I do not have to subject myself to your cross examination." I have been waiting for a judge to say those words. I do think that he is the first judge I have ever heard say that to a sovereign citizen. All I can say is... "it's about time".
Thanks for a good little video to enjoy with my morning coffee, Mike. But smh that Pro Se Motorboat Boy asked for changes to his bond conditions, got them, then didn't even say thank you. Happy New Year. 🎉
This Judge has a lot of patience, which is a very positive attribute. He has taken time to explain some things to defendant, with a little teaching. I think it's OK as long as it's not taken too far. There are other cases.😅
Its nice to see a judge who takes the time to explain our court system to people who have little experience with it, instead of business as usual........ 👍
I can’t be certain, but it really felt like the judge was trying to ask this man if he’s seen the movie _My Cousin Vinny (1992),_ before he held him in contempt. 🤣
"An attorney may know something about the law that you don't." That judge has a talent for understatement. That's like saying that the sun MAY rise in the east.
So Mr McCloud made a reasonable, simple objection to the bail conditions and the judge was content to amend them. That should teach him that if he approaches things properly, he'll be treated properly.
IIRC this guy's most recent hearing finally had him swallowing his SovCit BS and taking a plea deal, after spending 69 days in jail!!! He vaguely admitted to being wrong, having his lawyer apologetically speak his mea culpa.
Since all sovcits use, verbatim, the exact same arguments in court, it might be safe to assume that they get their talking points as prizes from Cracker Jack boxes. The dozen or so sheets of paper they schlep around are just for show; simply by reducing the font size to 10 or 12, they could get it all on a strip of paper suitable for distribution inside fortune cookies.
That judge is extremely polite, kind and most importantly helpful to the defendant and tried to warn him. Never try to represent yourself. It's just a bad idea. 🤷♂️
If he doesn't care about operating a motor boat while intoxicated, and believes he shouldn't be charged for this, you can rest assured, he has the same attitude towards driving a car while intoxicated!
By granting him leave to proceed pro se, Judge Gauthier put him in the position of having to make another choice: Keep chasing that sovereign line -- which is about as useful as trying to draw three cards to fill a straight flush when you're playing spades -- or deal in real law. I wonder when that's going to hit him.
Saw a video once where an attorney reported to the judge that he told the sovtard he could easily win the case but the defendant refused because doing it that way would make a contract with the government.
They never, ever win. Why do they keep trying? If I considered going the sovcit route, I'd research outcomes of similar cases first. Guess they never do this! This judge is quite good at handling sovcits. He remains respectful but does not yield.
How DARE the Mirage not provide lime green curtains for their guests in order to accommodate the needs of their YT provider guests who prefer a Chicago skyline background!!!
"I do not have to subject myself to your cross-examination". Extremely well-said Judge. Respect!
Yeah...That's a mic drop moment.
I loved that line too!
This guy has probably been watching Marc Stevens' pseudo-law videos. One of his tenets is to constantly ask the judge stupid, irrelevant and ridiculous questions and ask them over and over and over. Fortunately, this judge ain't having it. And the 30 days in jail definitely cooled this SovCit's jets.
@@scottmccrea1873 It's interesting that some of the sovcit shenanigans are so distinctive that it's possible to trace them to a single source.
Absolutely. Stevens is the source of most pseudo-law (I _think_ @juangalt3496 would agree with this.) The relentless monomaniacal focus on "jurisdiction". But the real tell is the relentless questioning. The judge nailed it - "I'm not going to be cross-examined by you." And that's really the Stevens technique. It relies on the judge's need to hand-hold pro se defendants. Despite all the crap about "not treating you any differently than an attorney" of course they do. Stevens relies on this start peppering the judge with nonsensical questions. *As far as I can tell, the real goal is to get judges and prosecutors to throw out cases so they don't have to deal with these idiots.* Stevens is pretty dumb but he realizes that his "legal" theories don't mean shit in courtrooms and never and never will win. Ergo, the Pain-in-the-Ass technique.
Sadly, sometimes this works. But less and less. More and more, judges are doing what this one did, "Shut up or go to jail."
Stevens got busted by the AZ State Bar for practicing law without a license (or any sense). This also cooled _his_ jets. Tho this is difficult to police. He has a 1A right to spout his bullshit. Where it crosses the line into "practice" is another question and not an easy one to answer. @@streetleveltech
That judge is seriously one of the most patient and kind judges on the planet!
He is. And most effective. He proved jurisdiction when he sent him to jail for 24 hours.
My younger brother is a judge in Belgium and I showed im this; oh boy !!!!
Judge Gauthier is my favorite judge to watch each week!
He’s just doing his job.
For some reason he's giving this guy a lot of leeway.
You or I would be slapped down.
Judge Gauthier has the patience and grace of a saint.
He's quite unique isn't he?
He’s the worst kind of Judge for sovereign citizens. He’s stern and most importantly, he knows EXACTLY what they’re doing. Both those combined are kryptonite to their bullshit.
"The court's going to enter a not guilty plea on your behalf"
"I object"
Would you rather a guilty plea?
No, I wish to contest jurisdiction. Pleading implicitly acknowledges jurisdiction. He's an idiot, but that's what he's trying to get at.
@@BenjWarrant I get what you're saying but at least my understanding is that personal jurisdiction being waived is a civil law thing, with a criminal charge the crime has to be tried in the jurisdiction the actual crime occurred so the defendant's plea doesn't waive that requirement and it has to be proven at trial.
@@Vaelosh466 There's no such thing as 'personal jurisdiction', perhaps you mean something else? A court has jurisdiction over persons, areas, and issues.
You can't "waive" jurisdiction, you have to challenge it, and that would be on the basis that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over you, or over the locus, or over the issue being tried. If you don't challenge jurisdiction at the earliest opportunity, you will probably be taken to have acknowledged jurisdiction and thereafter it will be impossible. In the US, it can certainly be an issue in criminal justice - e.g. 'this is a Michigan court but this was a federal offence', or vice versa; also 'this is a Michigan court but I'm from Wisconsin', that sort of thing.
@@BenjWarrant that's all well and good but if I'm travelling as the vessel that is the agent for the being of myself under Admiralty law the only people who have personal jurisdiction over me are mental health workers! 😉 😂
@@mattanderson9029that's funny. What's worse is I've watched so many sovcit vids (as you obviously have too) that I half made sense of it. Scary.
Every SovCit is hoping they have a Perry Mason moment, but it always ends as a Gomer Pyle episode.
He's more Ernest T. Bass from The Andy Griffith show!
😊@@stevesmith2229
surprise, surprise, surprise.....
so many boomer references in this and i love it
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"I don't understand - I comprehend" is the statement of a great legal scholar.
😂😂😂😂
I'm just digging his blue flannel sport coat.
These SovCits think wordplay is the strongest legal argument one can make.
He obviously didn’t attend Harvard law school.
These nuts think that its all in a word play game and that you can find a loophole if you use a better word than the other side; They are all very very ignorant people lacking in even a basic education and hate to say it but the judges need to force the lawyer on them; All of them are getting state or FED disability So the Judge should look into making them wards of the state;
"Nobody's making you give up your right to an attorney" almost stumped him. (I guess that wasn't in the script.)
I bet he has huge thumb muscles from all of that thumbing through paperwork he's been doing 😂
Actually that was the contention of the Judge. He instructed the defendant that he could not represent himself AND retain his rights to an attorney too. So, in order to have any self-representation rights, the Judge had decided the defendant had to give up his rights to counsel of an attorney.
Though most attorneys apparently would flat out refuse to provide advise or counsel before a court, if the defendant is claiming sovereign citizen status.
@@johnschmitt571that's not what the judge said.
You have the right to remain silent, and you also have the right to testify at trial. You can't do both at the same time. That's just a logical fact.
Same as the logi sl fact that the judge stated here; you have a right to representation of counsel, and you have the right to represent yourself, but you can't do both at the same time.
With sovcits the word "understand" is a trigger word.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
They think it is a secret code that really means "I stand under the authority of the state." Total bonkers magical thinking
I've noticed. That's the whole problem. 😂 they don't understand anything!! 😂
"If I say 'understand', I'll be bound to their damn contract!! I guess I'll have to say 'comprehend' in order to duck and roll out of this." If he had an IQ over 75, he'd know both words mean the same exact thing 😂.
What a dope! If he doesn’t straighten up, the judge should send he back to jail.
"I do not have to subject myself to your cross-examination." Love this judge!
Two of life’s hard nos:
•Never bleach your own hair
•Never defend yourself
in court
Hard nose?
Yep, I hear ya. Tried the first one myself one time... YIKES
@@tonyparete6892Oh my…😂
Nathalielawyerchick once did a video where a lawyer was defending herself. The video showcased one of the key reasons of why it was a bad idea - the lady got too passionate aboit her own case and ended up acting like a 5 yrs old child towards the end. Iirc she had messed up at some lawyer stuff and was put on probation, then she violated the probation. Then in court she argued that since the original case already destroyed her career, she had been punished enough. Implying it gave her a free pass at violating her probation. Judge didn't see it that way and gave her one year of jail. I can't recall whether it was actual jail or deferred with a minimal time to serve, but either way the lady was her own worst enemy for deciding to represent herself...
😂 😂 😂
Uh oh, he was operating a boat on the waterways. Doesn't that mean he is now under maritime law?!?!?!? There goes the sovereign argument.
😂😂😂
If he was in international water what's your argument
Pretty sure he wasn’t in international waters.
I was waiting for the "berth" argument myself.
@@JenniferFordEsq not my point. Who's the victim in this hideous crime? All this country does is look for a scap goat for everything.
He doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'understanding' something and 'agreeing' with something. A truly special appearance.
It is part if the script. I wonder if any of them have a clue what they are saying or how dumb they sound.
It's like they're playing a game of Monopoly but the guy insists on using the rulebook to Scrabble.
More like the rulebook to The Cones of Dunshire.
I’m a disabled Police Officer I wish when I was serving I had him for a judge. His manner of talking calmly and articulating and disarming the defendant is textbook but he has that lt about his courtroom demeanor. Great Job your Honor!
Wait wait did I just hear boat?? So this must be under admiralty law!
Maybe maritime?😉
Depends on the body of water
I'm just waiting for "I wasn't boating drunk; I was traveling by water."
We appreciate your professionalism and commitment Mike! We need you.
I agree!! Your commitment is stellar…..😊
Any defendant who asks to have the bond condition of removing random drug test, you should 100% KEEP IT in place! There's your sign!
So his defence will be to hold his breath, block his ears and stamp his feet while yelling “You’re not the boss of me!”
What a sharp legal mind.😂
Lol that sounds like a sovcidiot.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
yup - sovcits have a very consistent level of emotional maturity, VERY consistent.
The ostrich defense has trumped the Chewbacca defense finally.
Sharp as a spoon!
Facing felonies and represent himself? What’s the worst that could happen? Oh yeah three years prison.
And/or $1000 fine. Which I still find hilarious by comparison.
This is why we love you. "There you have it. He is still stupid," as said by Mike. That right there is a T-shirt! Happy New Year everyone!
I love how he totally treats him like a child.
And the guy has no clue
He would totally treat you the same way?
@@JLova82, clearly you haven't seen much of this judge young sovcit.
@@jacobsmith7385 Irrelevant
👎👎👎 The judge did not do that.
This judge has the patience of Job!
Thanks Mike, these Judges really earn their pay dealing with SovCit. Like Mr. Motor-mouth McClown.
Have a safe trip back home❤
This judge is so patient with this person….
I appreciate the shout-out, brother! You must've hopped on right away. Cheboygan is in Northern Michigan. Judge Gauther presides over both Presque Isle and Cheboygan County. I can't wait to see how he handles the next few docket calls. February 6th, at 9am will be epic. I really hope that the judge agreeing to the amendment of his bond stipulations gets to Trevor's head so we can bust out the popcorn and watch the circus show. It's funny how he thought he was a genius by avoiding using the word "understand" but that he "comprehends" the charges instead. Comprehend means the exact same thing as understand 🤣. Mind you this dude is almost 49 years old!!
This judge could teach classes! I think he has studied this situation since the last time ha saw this guy.
the county should be able to afford a quiet keyboard for the clerk, eh
Or turn the microphone close to her off.
It probably proves it's an honest well budgeted county..😊
Contempt charge really tuned this dude up.
But not entirely.
Barely
@@powbobs Well they got through an arraignment without a complete meltdown which is pretty good for a sovcit
Got him all the way right. He still tried to get his shyt off but he definitely learned to stfu
It's amazing how much 24 hrs will do for a man's attitude
Love the way they all shuffle papers like amateur lawyers trying to look important 😂😂😂😂😂
Just looking for the right incantations that will unlock the secret "nullify judge and judicial system" power-up.
Where we live, a watercraft violation also appears in and affects your Driving Privilege, and is very serious violation. The fines are astounding and the consequences are such one would be an absolute fool to self represent.
Yes it does.
This is gearing up to be a classic
I see him getting his own playlist.
The Judge outsmarted him because Comprehend & understand means to same …so when he said he comprehended it. He was saying he understood…clever judge
The judge did a good job at keeping this guy on subject and ignoring his nonsense.
That night in jail for contempt seemed to calm him down.
I like that this judge uses "comprehend" instead of understand, so that this clown can't keep playing Sov--Cit semantics about not standing under, etc. These clowns infuriate me, however.
"Can I say something for the record? " Answer: No. LOL
It makes me want to scream when Sov Cits create nonsensical definitions of words. The misuse of proper english is a punishable offense in my family. Understand- perceive the intended meaning of (words, a language or a speaker). Ahhhhhhh!!!!
One of the best judges on these cases I have seen.
Hi from France! He should have known to never F with a judge who has a French last name 😁
Have a nice day! 😘🌺
A great example of someone with eccentric ideas being treated with respect and learning how to respond in a better way.
Happy New Year Mike!! Thanks for your commitment to keeping us laughing! 😉❤ Wishing you and all the awesome subs an AMAZING 2024!!
The judge is a saint. A paragon of patience.
Good lord the goat got me at the end lmao. Was like 10 times louder than the court video lmao.
This judge is priceless! So deliberate but also caring.
Why do you NEVER activate "closed captions"? I realize it isn't exactly correct, but the audio in theses courtrooms are atrocious!
The passiveness in which this judge, without the defendant “comprehending” is amazing. I do wish that he would’ve been much more stern and no bs, but it does seem like he was having a bit of fun so drastically explaining how the court works. May the gods bless his soul.
Man, most times I try motorboating when intoxicated, I get my face slapped.
Pretty sure that's gonna happen without being intoxicated.
Thank you Mike!...this video is chock full of crunchy sovcit goodness 🤗
Someone needs to get the court stenographer a quieter keyboard!
ROFL!
Judge says, "I'm not asking you trick questions!"
SovCit thinks, 'But all I got is trick answers!'
Good lord that goat was loud 😂😂😂
Oh this cashew is going to think he’s ‘won’ because the judge modified the bond 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
Did a sov cit just admit to giving up a right.. the whole legal argument of sov cits in court is to not give up their rights.. bravo judge for making him admit no one made him give up that right but himself
Treaty of Washington in a domestic case? The judge ought to order a psych eval and drug testing.
"I do not have to subject myself to your cross examination."
I have been waiting for a judge to say those words. I do think that he is the first judge I have ever heard say that to a sovereign citizen. All I can say is... "it's about time".
Thanks for a good little video to enjoy with my morning coffee, Mike. But smh that Pro Se Motorboat Boy asked for changes to his bond conditions, got them, then didn't even say thank you. Happy New Year. 🎉
Judge has gone above and beyond on this one to help this person
Great way to bring the New Year in!! Happy New Year, Mike!!
This Judge has a lot of patience, which is a very positive attribute. He has taken time to explain some things to defendant, with a little teaching. I think it's OK as long as it's not taken too far. There are other cases.😅
Its nice to see a judge who takes the time to explain our court system to people who have little experience with it, instead of business as usual........ 👍
I can’t be certain, but it really felt like the judge was trying to ask this man if he’s seen the movie _My Cousin Vinny (1992),_ before he held him in contempt. 🤣
"An attorney may know something about the law that you don't." That judge has a talent for understatement. That's like saying that the sun MAY rise in the east.
I love the way he used comprehend instead of understand. He played stump the duphus!
I was not prepared for the volume level of the goat 😅
😅😂😅😂😅 The screaming goat at 20:55 scared the f*** out of me!! LMAO I have my earbuds in and wasn't even looking at the phone, just listening.😅🤣😂😅😅
If he would just explain to the judge that he doesn’t have jurisdiction I think the judge would dismiss this case.
😂
So Mr McCloud made a reasonable, simple objection to the bail conditions and the judge was content to amend them. That should teach him that if he approaches things properly, he'll be treated properly.
Mike, that goat was uncalled for. I was wearing earbuds and the trial was hard to hear, and here comes the goat against my eardrums with the AAAAAAAA
He finally took his plea ladies and gents after sitting 45+ days for failing to appear to court. He pled to all charges plus absconding. 😂😂
I genuinely pity anyone who had to share a cell with this fool.
He doesn't like not being in control. That is the bottom line. PERIOD
This judges brilliance is based in his stone faced subtlety.
He rips this dripping faucet a new one with each turn of phrase.
Hilarious!
The judge handled this fool like a champ.
Do sovcits go to the same school as flat earthers.
The same...😮
IIRC this guy's most recent hearing finally had him swallowing his SovCit BS and taking a plea deal, after spending 69 days in jail!!! He vaguely admitted to being wrong, having his lawyer apologetically speak his mea culpa.
We all love motor boating! 😂 we appreciate you Mike keep up the good work!!
Hello Mike. I see you're still in Las Vegas and look reasonably in good health!!! Always good to start the day off with a Judge Gauthier/SovCit combo.
So many flashbacks to Darrell "Groundz" Brooks.
Every Sovereign LOVES to hear themselves spout their rhetoric! 😂
This judge is the best. Applause.
That judge is WAYYYY more patient than I could ever be.
Does this doof think his distinction of “comprehend” instead of “understand” makes a difference in court? That right there ain’t a good sign
They think “understand” means “to stand under”.
He thinks of he says the right magic words laws funny apply to him.
“The court will enter a not guilty plea on your behalf”
Idiot: “I object”
“Well, you don’t want me entering a guilty plea for you.”
The Judge is absolutely professional.
The Plaintiff is a complete DORK .
What a very patient judge!
Since all sovcits use, verbatim, the exact same arguments in court, it might be safe to assume that they get their talking points as prizes from Cracker Jack boxes. The dozen or so sheets of paper they schlep around are just for show; simply by reducing the font size to 10 or 12, they could get it all on a strip of paper suitable for distribution inside fortune cookies.
That judge is extremely polite, kind and most importantly helpful to the defendant and tried to warn him. Never try to represent yourself. It's just a bad idea. 🤷♂️
And then buddy was completely rude
That baby goat scared the crap out of me! 😂😂😂
Any other mystery science theatre fans hearing crow say 'MCCLOUD!'?
Representing yourself is just plain stupid. If I would ever get into some legal trouble, I would definitely get an attorney!
This judge is so patient.
Thank you for your dedication. Happy New Year everyone.
That goat noise made me jump
u keep me laughing
If he doesn't care about operating a motor boat while intoxicated, and believes he shouldn't be charged for this, you can rest assured, he has the same attitude towards driving a car while intoxicated!
By granting him leave to proceed pro se, Judge Gauthier put him in the position of having to make another choice: Keep chasing that sovereign line -- which is about as useful as trying to draw three cards to fill a straight flush when you're playing spades -- or deal in real law.
I wonder when that's going to hit him.
I almost commented, "we can hear you," like it's a live stream, and he can see my reply right away. 🤦🏻♀️
Saw a video once where an attorney reported to the judge that he told the sovtard he could easily win the case but the defendant refused because doing it that way would make a contract with the government.
I like the way the backdrop behind the judge looks like prison bars!!!
This guy is off his rocker to think after going to jail for this crap to then pull it again!!!😂😂😂
The court clerk NEEDS soft click keys on her keyboard! That clicking is SO LOUD you can barely hear what's going on! Geez!
They never, ever win. Why do they keep trying? If I considered going the sovcit route, I'd research outcomes of similar cases first. Guess they never do this! This judge is quite good at handling sovcits. He remains respectful but does not yield.
How DARE the Mirage not provide lime green curtains for their guests in order to accommodate the needs of their YT provider guests who prefer a Chicago skyline background!!!
😆👍
If the judges questions do not follow the sovcit's script, there can be confusion.