The magnification is important, it matters if you see something at 0.2 degrees or 20! It's just not the case that more is necessarily better. It depends heavily on the object.
Great unboxing. I just set mine up and can’t wait to see a full flat field. As I understand it there is no need to set back-focus without the reducer but with the reducer you still need 55mm from back of the reducer. Can’t wait to see your images. Clear Skies!
I have an old (~20years) TeleVue NP101. This is a compareable System to this one. 101mm Aperture, 560mm focal length. The Design is also a petzval system, that means 4 lenses in two groups. Photographic field is very useable for chip size to APS-C, full frame is also useable but then in the edges you see little disadvantages. And on the backside is mounzpted a very fine Feathertouch focusser, So what is the advantage of the new Askar?
I am sorry, but I have no possibility to compare this with any other tube, I feel it has chromatic aberrations, but for this price it is quite normal to have such. Better lenses are far more expensive.
Question for you - when the reducer is installed, do the extensions to the camera thread directly to that reducer? And it looks like the reducer has M48 threads on it to connect the camera, correct?
Can you use a binovierwer without focus problems? The combination of short focal length with good aperture and very good optics makes me think it can be an awesome binocular.
Not sure I completely understand what you are talking about, but still: I feel myself as an astrophotographer, so I do not think I will ever create a setup for visual astronomy (my eyes do not allow me to view any glowing objects in focus even with eyeglasses). Maybe I will try myself in a computer-aided visual astronomy, but that is a different case =) and will be in the distant future, I guess.
У меня флэшбэки какец, будто я на паре английского и смотрю в окно, все серое какое-то, тоска прям невозможная, потому что на фоне какая-то бедолага пересказывает текст именно зазубренный дословно, а не по смыслу. Просто ей выпал пересказ самой говеной части книги или просто говеный рассказ, который легче выучить, чем пересказать. Ну да ладн, раз англоязычная аудитория требует.
The magnification is important, it matters if you see something at 0.2 degrees or 20! It's just not the case that more is necessarily better. It depends heavily on the object.
Поздравляю с обновкой !!!
Good gradulation have many years of pleasure with it, clear sky!!!
Great Video! Where did you get the Bahtinov mask?
Great unboxing. I just set mine up and can’t wait to see a full flat field. As I understand it there is no need to set back-focus without the reducer but with the reducer you still need 55mm from back of the reducer. Can’t wait to see your images.
Clear Skies!
Thank you, watch the other video on the channel about the Sadr region ;)
@@astrobath Those images are so sharp, the stars are beautifully out to the corners.
I have an old (~20years) TeleVue NP101. This is a compareable System to this one. 101mm Aperture, 560mm focal length. The Design is also a petzval system, that means 4 lenses in two groups. Photographic field is very useable for chip size to APS-C, full frame is also useable but then in the edges you see little disadvantages. And on the backside is mounzpted a very fine Feathertouch focusser,
So what is the advantage of the new Askar?
I am sorry, but I have no possibility to compare this with any other tube, I feel it has chromatic aberrations, but for this price it is quite normal to have such. Better lenses are far more expensive.
Question for you - when the reducer is installed, do the extensions to the camera thread directly to that reducer? And it looks like the reducer has M48 threads on it to connect the camera, correct?
Correct. My camera is attached to the filter wheel and then to the reducer, M48 thread.
@@astrobath with that fast f/3.9 reducer, my big 2 inch filters, and the APS-C ZWO 2600MM camera, should I see any vignetting?
@@chrismcgrew4692 as far as I remember there is no vignetting. You may check my video about Pelican Nebula
Большое Спасибо!
Can you use a binovierwer without focus problems? The combination of short focal length with good aperture and very good optics makes me think it can be an awesome binocular.
Not sure I completely understand what you are talking about, but still: I feel myself as an astrophotographer, so I do not think I will ever create a setup for visual astronomy (my eyes do not allow me to view any glowing objects in focus even with eyeglasses). Maybe I will try myself in a computer-aided visual astronomy, but that is a different case =) and will be in the distant future, I guess.
and in Russian, as I understand it, the video will be released later?!
Так про распаковку на русском - на русскоязычном канале уже было же 🤣
@@astrobath ааа, понял 🤣🤣🤣
Aperture should be 72 mm!
Why? 😳
У меня флэшбэки какец, будто я на паре английского и смотрю в окно, все серое какое-то, тоска прям невозможная, потому что на фоне какая-то бедолага пересказывает текст именно зазубренный дословно, а не по смыслу. Просто ей выпал пересказ самой говеной части книги или просто говеный рассказ, который легче выучить, чем пересказать.
Ну да ладн, раз англоязычная аудитория требует.
Спасибо за комментарий, побольше бы таких. Рад, что не оставил равнодушным 🤣👍
А вы в курсе, что есть русскоязычный канал АстроБаня? 😇
@@astrobath конечно в курсе! Думаете я читать не умею??? Вы же написали сверху. А до этого не знал.