yes their ignorance just throw some big words - doping etc when facts suggest accidental minor contamination with no effect on performance.. wada made a mountain out of a molehill.
I only see one new feature here compared to other good, modern machines. The machine can move back and forth independently, so long line balls and cross balls are also possible in one drill. But at the moment it looks to me as if the movements of the machine are still too slow, so that the next ball ejection takes longer as the distance increases and there is too much time between the individual balls. Was that the maximum movement speed of the machine, or can it be set even faster?
And she took a substance herself, even after it was banned, in quantities large enough to make a difference in performance. Sinner did none of those things. The same rules applied to him as to Sharapova, but the cases were different so the outcomes were different. Why do some of you think every doping allegation is exactly the same?
Simona Halep too😢😢Why his case was kept hidden for 6 month? Why Sinner is the only one I know not suspended until the verdict is done? How many hours passed from the moment costobol entered his body, and they tested it ? Can you imagine if Djokovic was found with substance in his body?
@@retyfuller4641 It's been explained over and over. If you'd go somewhere other than conspiracy theory websites you'd know. Halep couldn't name the source of the contamination so she was suspended. Sinner could, so his suspension was lifted quickly. And yes, he was suspended which you all want to pretend didn't happen because it wasn't long enough for you. I'll bet you still won't bother getting informed. You'll just keep whining like all the cultists do.
@@retyfuller4641 Because the athlete has the right to appeal the suspension and once the appeal is accepted the suspension is lifted until the case is settled. In the event of a pending decision after an appeal the rules state that the case cannot be made public until the final verdict (WADC art. 14.3.2). Halep, and others, didn't immediately appeal the suspension so the suspension was not lifted and the case had to be made public. How hard is to inform yourself before writing nonsense?
Something is making them do this because this is also not beneficial for WADA. Everything indicates that they are concerned about some facts we do not have. As time goes on, we can only assume that not all information is public and transparent.
Tenho acompanhado há anos o tênis mundial. Está história não pode ser diferente dos demais que caíram na malha fina do doping. Sinner não pode ser diferente porque mesmo que ele não sabia(nao,acredito ,porque o treinador dele,era muito próximo demais pra não compartilhar o movimento que ele,estava fazendo pra ficar mais forte na quadra) outros,jogadores foram penalizados duramente e com ele mesmo,sendo hoje o número,um do mumdo não pode ser diferente
I do agree 100% it's so wrong, hardly any fair sports this day's, how sad, people are paying big bucks, to watch this kind of cheats, and WADA allows it. Shame on them crooks!
These groups just want to make an example out of someone. Shameful. I have always been a fan of Alcaraz & now ❤ him. What rival would stand behind & hope the best for his main rival? Maybe like Rafa has & Agassi two great champions have. These councils need to stop this witch hunt. Stay strong Jannik - you will be vindicated.
Reality…. If anybody found out positive for any drugs illegal for sports event… guilty or not..accept the rulings… issue was about fairness for everyone… make sense
If everything was so clean as Sinner claims - or mostly clean - there is not the slightest dilemma that WADA would have spared itself the effort, time, and money and simply accepted the original decision of ITIA. However, this shows that there are clearly some flaws in the original verdict, which, if they were to be revealed later, could seriously damage WADA's reputation and cause too many problems. We can only guess, but it is highly likely that not all information is public regarding this case. Escalation is not beneficial for anyone here WADA, ITIA or Sinner, but clearly something we dont know is forcing WADA to push this case further...
WADA appealed only for negligence not for intentionality. WADA accepted was a contamination and not doping. But rules are so tight that even unintentional contamination without doping effect can be sanctioned if contamination happens because of lack of negligence. Nonsense but it's like this. A lot of people making comments need to go to school, they can write but not read😢
What fine, he should be banned, a rule should be a same rule, for everyone regardless, who they are, or what they are. Why takes so long, to work out this shit, in everything and every way is corruption, what a shameful thing to do, this days in very much-loved sport so called 🎾 🎾 What's wrong WADA it's time to do your jobs, fair and square for everyone equally, without taking sides, or perhaps some bribe!
@@johnmajores As I said Jannick Sinner paid a fine of almost a quarter of a million dollars. Why didn’t WADA intervene then? If WADA thinks that this is incorrect then refund Sinner the$$$$$ or butt out!
It wasn't enough for Sharapova, caught once! Sinner caught twice in his short career, a slap on the wrist, part with a few bucks and back to being a hero? What happened to justice and integrity?
Others in exactly the same situation have also been cleared. Others in different circumstances naturally had different outcomes. That's what a lot of whiners don't get. Just because it's a doping allegation doesn't mean it's the exact same as other doping allegations. Informed people realize it. And experts ruled that he didn't intentionally dope so he gets to keep playing. Show us your credentials and tell us when you did an investigation and came up with a different conclusion.
@@TennisZoneUs It also agrees with the initial investigation that Sinner didn't dope intentionally. They are not disputing that. They are seeking to define 'negligence'. Should he have been able to prevent the trainer and physio from using the banned substance? Let's hope Sinner wins, because, if not, all players will be held to a draconian standard of having to be the parent and treat all their employees like irresponsible children who can't be trusted.
It amazes me that so many comments are ignorant of the facts - READ the independent tribunals decision please, then comment!
Sadly, most of those tribunals are either bribed or simply can't be trusted!
yes their ignorance just throw some big words - doping etc when facts suggest accidental minor contamination with no effect on performance.. wada made a mountain out of a molehill.
"Sinner´s lawyer believes his client is innocent".... wow, that´s what you call "a surprise"? 🤣 I´m impressed, bro.
The surprise is for the atp for his statements on clostebol
@@AIexOut-A-Magic-x6w 🤡🤡🙄🙄bravo 👏
I only see one new feature here compared to other good, modern machines. The machine can move back and forth independently, so long line balls and cross balls are also possible in one drill.
But at the moment it looks to me as if the movements of the machine are still too slow, so that the next ball ejection takes longer as the distance increases and there is too much time between the individual balls.
Was that the maximum movement speed of the machine, or can it be set even faster?
Standards & rules should apply to all. Fairness & equality. Maria Sharapova was way up there in rankings when she was sanctioned.
And she took a substance herself, even after it was banned, in quantities large enough to make a difference in performance. Sinner did none of those things. The same rules applied to him as to Sharapova, but the cases were different so the outcomes were different. Why do some of you think every doping allegation is exactly the same?
Simona Halep too😢😢Why his case was kept hidden for 6 month? Why Sinner is the only one I know not suspended until the verdict is done? How many hours passed from the moment costobol entered his body, and they tested it ? Can you imagine if Djokovic was found with substance in his body?
@@retyfuller4641 It's been explained over and over. If you'd go somewhere other than conspiracy theory websites you'd know. Halep couldn't name the source of the contamination so she was suspended. Sinner could, so his suspension was lifted quickly. And yes, he was suspended which you all want to pretend didn't happen because it wasn't long enough for you. I'll bet you still won't bother getting informed. You'll just keep whining like all the cultists do.
@@retyfuller4641 Because the athlete has the right to appeal the suspension and once the appeal is accepted the suspension is lifted until the case is settled. In the event of a pending decision after an appeal the rules state that the case cannot be made public until the final verdict (WADC art. 14.3.2).
Halep, and others, didn't immediately appeal the suspension so the suspension was not lifted and the case had to be made public.
How hard is to inform yourself before writing nonsense?
Apologize to Simona Halep now!
All players should be treated the same.
yes, all innocent players should be allowed to play and not punished
they are treated same, the cases are different,
This is getting ridiculous! If it weren’t the World No. 1, would WADA be doing this?
Something is making them do this because this is also not beneficial for WADA. Everything indicates that they are concerned about some facts we do not have.
As time goes on, we can only assume that not all information is public and transparent.
Voila 😂😂😊😊il perche 😊😊
I agree wada is politically motivated.
@@KetinUSA There is a good possibility that Nicole Sapstead helped Sinner get away with serious doping. We will see in time..
Oh, boy! So, if Sinner is banned, who is going to be Carlos rival😮😮😮😮
Tenho acompanhado há anos o tênis mundial. Está história não pode ser diferente dos demais que caíram na malha fina do doping. Sinner não pode ser diferente porque mesmo que ele não sabia(nao,acredito ,porque o treinador dele,era muito próximo demais pra não compartilhar o movimento que ele,estava fazendo pra ficar mais forte na quadra) outros,jogadores foram penalizados duramente e com ele mesmo,sendo hoje o número,um do mumdo não pode ser diferente
I do agree 100% it's so wrong, hardly any fair sports this day's, how sad, people are paying big bucks, to watch this kind of cheats, and WADA allows it. Shame on them crooks!
These groups just want to make an example out of someone. Shameful. I have always been a fan of Alcaraz & now ❤ him. What rival would stand behind & hope the best for his main rival? Maybe like Rafa has & Agassi two great champions have. These councils need to stop this witch hunt. Stay strong Jannik - you will be vindicated.
No Mr. Alcaraz. Doping is not good for tennis. Ignoring a genuine doping suspicion and investigation, as you are doing, is worse than doping.
what's bad for tennis is punishing innocent players
Reality…. If anybody found out positive for any drugs illegal for sports event… guilty or not..accept the rulings… issue was about fairness for everyone… make sense
no one should be punished if innocent
@@bimwopbarn47 his not 100%
If everything was so clean as Sinner claims - or mostly clean - there is not the slightest dilemma that WADA would have spared itself the effort, time, and money and simply accepted the original decision of ITIA. However, this shows that there are clearly some flaws in the original verdict, which, if they were to be revealed later, could seriously damage WADA's reputation and cause too many problems.
We can only guess, but it is highly likely that not all information is public regarding this case. Escalation is not beneficial for anyone here WADA, ITIA or Sinner, but clearly something we dont know is forcing WADA to push this case further...
WADA appealed only for negligence not for intentionality. WADA accepted was a contamination and not doping. But rules are so tight that even unintentional contamination without doping effect can be sanctioned if contamination happens because of lack of negligence. Nonsense but it's like this.
A lot of people making comments need to go to school, they can write but not read😢
Just saying that there are maybe something we dont know and we couldn't read
maybe they're just bloodthirsty
wada harassment caused sinner to lose this match (beijing final). We expect a clarity on what their investigation is. They are responsible
well all information is public. Wada is irresponsible
Janick Sinner paid a fine for this offense. That should settle everything.
What fine, he should be banned, a rule should be a same rule, for everyone regardless, who they are, or what they are. Why takes so long, to work out this shit, in everything and every way is corruption, what a shameful thing to do, this days in very much-loved sport so called 🎾 🎾 What's wrong WADA it's time to do your jobs, fair and square for everyone equally, without taking sides, or perhaps some bribe!
@@johnmajores As I said Jannick Sinner paid a fine of almost a quarter of a million dollars. Why didn’t WADA intervene then? If WADA thinks that this is incorrect then refund Sinner the$$$$$ or butt out!
@@johnmajores no. innocent people shouldn't be punished. period.
It wasn't enough for Sharapova, caught once! Sinner caught twice in his short career, a slap on the wrist, part with a few bucks and back to being a hero? What happened to justice and integrity?
@@johnmajores Justice and Integrity? They left a long time ago. What is troubling now is that these “banned”! substances are in the public domain.
Sheater
This is not fair to others who have been in this situation. He not supposed to be playing.
Shut up you don’t know the truth, he’s cleared….what you don’t understand about that?
We will have to wait and see what the anti-doping agency says
Others in exactly the same situation have also been cleared. Others in different circumstances naturally had different outcomes. That's what a lot of whiners don't get. Just because it's a doping allegation doesn't mean it's the exact same as other doping allegations. Informed people realize it. And experts ruled that he didn't intentionally dope so he gets to keep playing. Show us your credentials and tell us when you did an investigation and came up with a different conclusion.
@@TennisZoneUs It also agrees with the initial investigation that Sinner didn't dope intentionally. They are not disputing that. They are seeking to define 'negligence'. Should he have been able to prevent the trainer and physio from using the banned substance? Let's hope Sinner wins, because, if not, all players will be held to a draconian standard of having to be the parent and treat all their employees like irresponsible children who can't be trusted.
@@billiey36 Sinner didn't "dope", it's a "contamination" caused by a skin healing lotion.
Sinner shouldn't be permitted. So biased a decision
Experts looked at the evidence. You joined a cult.
SINER DOPING CHEATER, WADA BRAVO...😅😅😅
Me Tarzan you Jane
no he is not. sinner is clean
@@biljanadokic9702 be auiii clowns 🤡 bravo 👏