I went from thirty years plus of using full frame Canons to X-H2. The Canons, while being great are a bit clinical. Going from 26MP to 40 was a big thing, but once I’d transferred I just fell in love with the Fujifilm process and their colour science is -to me- superior.
totally agree many moons ago i started out with a canon 6d and the trinity of lenses and a massive backpack and then one day hiking up a mountain i thought why am i packing all this gear about, i got sucked in to buying all the gear watching youtube videos telling me this is what you need and you dont. after that trip i sold it all and bought a xt2 and the 16-55 and a peak design sling and ive never looked back and used it everywhere because i can take it everywhere, i did buy the xt3 when it came out and still use it to this day it does what i need it to do, i did try the fuji x100v for a while and hated it so dont believe the hype as it may not work for you :)
I chose Fuji when I decided to go mirrorless in 2014. I went from full frame Canon 5d3 to a fuji XT1. I chose it because it felt most like a film camera which was my background. I loved that there was an aperture ring on the lens. And it was super easy to use the buttons and dials and not menus that's what I disliked about the Sony cameras. Eventually I sold all my Canon gear and currently I am shooting with a Fuji xt3 still. I also love my Fuji x100f and you're right it does make photography fun again
"I don't know if you've heard 'bout SquareSpace..." ROTFLOL. I get the camera-relationship thing completely! I was so disappointed when Lumix replaced the love-of-my-life G9 with a box with all the controls moved G9II. My new love is the OM-1. It should not matter that much, but things other than specs do. The G9II innerds on the old G9 body would have been stellar. The mentoring sounds like a blast, have fun! Cheers!
Just got an xpro2 in the mail this past weekend. I had the same problem with my canon system I loved it but it always felt like a chore lugging out the heavy kit. Ultimately leading me to not taking pictures for years! Now I enjoy photography again!
Great video, Rick, and great message. 👏🏻👏🏻 They say, the best camera is the one you have on you, but if you pack a camera and barely get it out of the bag then that is no good. I remember I only upgraded due to weather sealing, so nowadays my Nikon Z6ii, with super zoom 24-200mm and 40mm prime, is all I need to get out and be inspired. Best of luck with the X-T4. Your work with their earlier cameras, and X100, is great.
Thanks Andy, that sounds like a good combo. I think I'm better at being a bit more realistic about what I'm going to use too.... I know how infrequently I use my 70-200 for example these days, so it now mostly stays at home. Gone are the days of "oh well I *might* need that", then putting everything in my bag!
I shoot with the XT-2, when I look at my holiday, landscape and street photography I ask myself would I take better photos with the XT-5 or a full frame camera? I look at my photos on a TV or make a photo book - and you don't need a higher resolution for either. If I were to shoot more video, then I would probably upgrade to the XT-5. The main advantage for me is simply the compact system size and the price-performance ratio.
Would have fancied a switch from Nikon F to Fuji X and that would have been an X-T4 back then. I've always had and still have a soft spot for the brand, the colours, control scheme, smaller size and price, etc. Problem is, I wanted a high quality 24-120 and a 100-300/400 equivalent lens to start out. In the end I went with a Z6 because their versions of these zooms turned out to be quite a bit superior.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I find always interesting to hear about the gear the photographer is using as well as seeing the sample images. The camera which begs me to pick it up is Sony 7Cii with 35 and 55 Sony/Za lenses. I had Canon, Nikon, Panasonic and Fuji cameras but none of them brought me the same joy. For the first time I thought that street photography is fun. The size and performance are unmatched.
Love your advice. I always wonder about whether I’m supposed to be upgrading my camera. This helps set so much context around that thought. Thank you 🤩
I completely understand what you have been going through. I have been through the exact same process. Several different models of both Sony and Fuji. I have settled on a Fuji X-H1 and a Sony A7R2. Both are old and outdated by current standards (kind of like me 😅), but both were flagship bodies when they were originally released. And that makes them good enough for me, and both are more capable than my skillset. I enjoy both cameras equally, but when I want to take landscape photos or crop, I take the Sony. When I want beautiful colours and feel more creative, I take the Fuji. The perfect blend for my needs.
Had full frame Nikon and bought fuji xt20. Over the next year, found I liked my fuji photos more - probably cos that was the one I picked up the most.... No Nikon now 😊
Totally agree on the fun of using the Fuji cameras. I love the analog dials and feel of the X-T5, I’m a retired commercial photographer with a complete Canon FF DSLR system that I rarely use😜
Re. taking on mentoring gigs... Do what you love! Go for it. I still shoot mainly Canon APS-C but in the past year I stepped all the way back to the Fujifilm X-T1. I love, love, love this camera. It sings to me. Call it my weekend hobby sports car; whatever. I really don't care about it's flaws when compared with newer gear. I enjoy its constraints, its foibles and flaws. 16 MP versus whatever, don't care. I'm having a ball. Cheers Rick. Thanks for sharing.
I'm shooting on Sony (a7c) and Fuji x100v as well! - and what you've described is very real. The Sony has been my Zoom (video coaching biz) and workhorse, but then you feel an itch that needs scratching and you pull out the Fuji. Thinking of giving in to a bit of GAS and going for Xpro2, we'll see. But the point about truly "seeing" - this has been my mantra, might make a video on this later. Good luck.
Good honest video, thanks Rick, I am lucky enough to be able to use 3 Canon cameras, R8,R7 and 90d all 3 are fantastic cameras! I also picked up an 1100d at a garage sale really cheap, it was very grubby and dusty but after a couple of hours of deep cleaning it looks like brand new and I am having a blast using it, I agree that if you can get great shots from a low grade camera, then you can get great shots with any camera!
I agree with this. It is why I love my Nikon zf. It makes me want to take it out and shoot photos. Even with the Nikon Z6iii out it feels boring and uninspiring because looks and feels similar to everything two before it. Nikon zf to me shows that I enjoy photography, Nikon Z6iii is like I do photography as my job and not the hobby.
I understand what you say about fun, but you also talk about size and weight, a bit strange that you show the Sony with a sigma 85mm 1.4. If you had an similar lens on the fuji (at least in terms of depth of field) it would have been the Fuji 50mm 1.0. Then the size and weight had become almost the same. It would have been better to mount sony's 40mm 2.5 on your R5, the difference in size would have been much smaller compared to the X-T4 with an f/2 lens.
Size and weight was just a factor. No matter which lens you put on the Sony, the equivalent setup on the Fuji will be smaller and lighter, but I get what you are saying. It doesn't change for me the fact that I still find the fuji much more enjoyable :)
@@RickBebbington I understand that Fuji is more enjoyable for you! And having the very latest equipment does not make you a better photographer. But I do not agree that it is just to conclude that the same equivalent setup on Fuji is smaller and lighter than the same equivalent on Sony. Two random lenses, the fuji 23mm 1.4 is a bit heavier and larger than the sony 35mm 1.8. The Fuji 50-140 2.8 is much heavier and larger than the sony 70-200 f/4 mark 2.
@@RickBebbington i think this statement is only half true about lens sizes. and its something that to me always surprises me like nothing else. You enjoy the fuji and fuji is a very old school tactile way of shooting... to me one of, if not THE selling point for a mirrorless compared to a dslr is the ability to adapt lenses and how freaking easy it is to focus because of focus peaking and such. when i hear people say that: ''oh yeah those sony lenses are soooo big'' well it always refers to new modern lenses. slap some MF vintage glas prime on there and it becomes tiny. i really dont get it. ''lenses so big, lenses so expensive'' you can get something like an old ai nikkor prime for like 40 bucks and its tiny. and there are so many insane value lenses out there like alot of the voigtländer ones, the helios, the nikon 135mm is a legend too. and all you really lose is autofocus... wich doesnt matter anything because of how easy mirrorless are for mf. yet people only talk about modern huge lenses
@@rumattsoI think it's not much the size but that Sony (and Canon) are a bit boring. Great technology and image quality. But not inspiring to shoot with. And that matters to the enjoyment. Image quality when people are displaying their work on Instagram doesn't really matter. I've started downgrading my gear a bit too. I'm having more fun shooting in a 12yo Fuji X-E1 using the straight out of camera film simulations. It's sluggish AF and only 16mo but I just want to pick it up and go for a walk. I would never had thought that I ditch shooting raw for my casual work but it's fun
I have 2 LUMIX cameras, 1 Nikon DSLR, and 3 Olympus/OM-System, in my collection along with a few others. I certainly reach for the OM-System/Olympus bodies, more often. I recently went for a walk in the Swedish countryside with both Olympus E-PL8, and LUMIX G90. The majority of photos are on the Olympus, because it is a more satisfying experience, even if the G90 is more advanced, and technically better.
I have newer Nikon model DSLRS, but lately I have truly enjoyed using an older D200 APSC camera or my D700 FF. They have lower megapixels but I don't care. There is something unique about the sensors in these cameras that produce unique colors.
I get it. I fell in love with the X-T3. I found the X-H2S to be superior for my photography event work and for video, so I have two of those bodies. I still enjoy picking up my X-T3 more.
This was a great video and topic! And I think an experience all photographers will go through at one point or another, whether your a professional or just a hobbyist. I recently moved to Fuji after shooting Nikon DSLR's for 15+ years, and it absolutely reignited my creativity and passion for photography. And it definitely helps that I can easily carry my camera with me everyday now, which was definitely a struggle before. I don't think it's just the inherent advantages of mirrorless cameras in general, but more specifically Fuji that has helped get me back into it, with their film sims and Fuji IQ features, native lenses, and frankly the community. And yes, they just look and feel cool, and I just want to take photos with it haha. But it being mirrorless has also played a big part as my potential lens selection has now become massive, especially from all the third party manufactures making really great lenses now, but also the ability to adapt glass (and both offering great value for the money!). I shoot both Canon FD and Nikon F manual lenses and I love it. But I don't think this just applies to Fuji, it can be about any brand and photographer, if the gear you use fulfills your needs and also sparks joy then that's what matters most.
amazing video and love all the quotes. i recently did the same thing, as a canon shooter my r6mk2 with f1.2 lens was way too heavy for everyday family and street photos. i got a 4 year old m6mk2 and a few lens for the fraction of the price of a f1.2 lens and i enjoy shooting with this smaller setup much more. keep up the great work!
Can’t agree more with you. XT4 is a great camera with enough megapixels and features for any type of shooting. Btw, I’m in process of switching to film which is even more drastic. Great video…keep them coming.
If you have any camera built after 2016, you can pretty much do everything and even get paid for it. A camera is just a tool. I fully agree with your approach here.
I had the same feelings between a Sony and my good old Olympus EM-1.. however the quality difference was just too big, so I said goodbye to the Oly. Using my 7 III and R IV now, just added some small lenses such as the great 28-60. Sony is about rationality, not about emotion. However I LOVE the lightroom session afterward, and after all its about the photos, not the gear, right?
have you checked out nikons instead? i feel you on Olympus and m43 to an extend. Their IQ is really lacking, due to messy their sensor is even at low iso. going for larger cameras however, i would pick a nikon over sony every single day. Its just the entire package around them. Nikon is an optics company, their camera are build like tanks, their lenses are awesome, they have a consistency in ergonomics and controls and just the pure fact how consumer oriented they are building on longlasting usage if i look back at how they kept alive F mount for 60 years. when i think sony, i think playstations and tvs. its more like an entertainment company first. and their cameras feel exactly like that. they feel like nimble plasticy computers in your hand and i can see why a sony would not inspire anyone to go out shooting.
@@MaybeTiberius Yes, you are probably right. Have been playing with Z9 one time and it is awesome. However I have a lot of Sony lenses, including the fantastic Zeiss 2.8's, 135 1.8 et cetera so exchanging them is rather expensive. So, Maybe some day in the future when Mapcamera Tokyo has some great occasions! For now, I happily use my Sonys and keep dreaming. (And being honest, the gear is not the limitation to the photos ;) )
Ha, ha, I've just bought a second hand X-T10 as a travel/street camera - my work cameras are Sony A7Riii and many years a go I had an X-T1 so pretty similar history to you. One thing I love about Fujifilm is being able to process the raw files in-camera, why can't Sony offer this. However, none of the Fuji X cameras I really see as work cameras, they just don't seem as robust as Sony or Nikon even if the output is pro quality. Also, I've heard their repair and after service is poor. Sony is an electronics company and they design their cameras in a no nonsense detached sort of way, using the X-T10 (with its great 16MP sensor) I could tell they consulted photographers in its design, so much better ergonomically than Sony, even the shutter sounds more pleasing. Sometimes limitations are spurs to creativity and I feel using 16MP APSC is making me approach photography differently. I now treat the full frame Sony like I used to treat my medium format camera!
The X100V doesn’t speak to me. I’ve wanted one. I waited a year on the waiting list before the camera was disconnected. I’m not willing to pay a premium for a camera. I bought a Sony A7C with the 35/2.8 instead. Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
Fuji is an addiction! On the video front, the XH2s, while not inspiring, does perform as-well as the Sony IMO... But with much better color and internal ProRes 422 HQ - 10bit. I had the XT2 and sold it for the XT4. I really like the XT4 with the exception of the flip screen. I can't justify the XT5 (Because the XH2 and XH2s are my work cameras... Along with the GFX 100s II), but the screen, improved IBIS, and increased resolution make it very tempting. Thanks for the content and welcome to the addiction. Cheers!
The video low light performance of the Sony is just something I can't walk away from I don't think!! Weirdly, I prefer the screen in the X-T4 to the 5..... they need to do what Sony and Nikon are doing with their screens now. Not a reason to change again though!!
@RickBebbington very true on the Sony's low light. They absolutely own that spec... But the color and menus are so horrendously bad that I just can't go there. The screen movement would be a nice addition to Fuji. Cheers!
Greetings to lyme park. I sold off my Sony A7R4 for a fuji XH2. Sony was massive overkill, slow computer etc and not enough difference in image quality. I now have lovely small lenses. And photo's just as good. Plus i couldn't gel with the sony. No love.
I would like to start taking my own pictures for portraits (oil paintings) and I have no idea what a decent camera is. If I have 500/1000 to spend, what would be a good option for me? I need to be able to shoot up close and I would like to be able to keep decent resolution if I zoom in on, for example, an eye. I saw your other vid on quality to price and I feel like I really don’t need the latest and the greatest. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated cause I’m a little stuck😂
If you can get a used Fuji X-T4 (or X-T3 or similar) and maybe a 35mm f2 wr lens, that might fit your budget and is a really strong option. It’s all subjective though, you might not like using that camera!! You can rent Fuji cameras and lenses from them from free for 48hrs, so maybe that’s worth a try first? Google Fuji rentals 👍🏻
I have the same passion actually, for my Sony A7RV as my interest is purely landscapes that’s the beauty about photography. Bang on point with everything, great vid Rick ❤
I've done the same and it has changed so much. Few years ago I switched from canon eos r to Sony a7iv and the Sony is the best camera I've ever owned the af is so far better than anything else I've tried and the dynamic range is insane. BUT it is uninspiring to shoot with. That lead me to shoot more film and I also got a X-T4 and more recently I stumbled on a too-cheap-to-pass x100f. I use the Sony for all my paid work but 100% of non paid work I use the Fujis.
Great video Rick and very true. I have just got back from Italy and while I used my Nikon Z8 most of the time a few times I just grabbed Jans Olympus, set it in aperture mode and used that when walking around the old towns and it was great. I also find that when you have a smaller looking camera people have no issues with you taking photos but the larger the camera some people get a bit funny.
It's not a downgrade. It's just a different sensor format 🙂 I switched from a Nikon Z50 to a Z7 II last year. And I do love this camera! But if Nikon would release an APS-C camera aimed at enthusiasts and pros, like the long rumored "Z80", I would definitely switch to that. I mainly shoot with telephoto lenses anyway and I would absolutely love an APS-C equivalent of the Z8. Though I would keep the Z7 II as a secondary camera. The resolution is nice to have and the dynamic range is kinda nuts compared to the Z50. The files are a lot easier to work with when shooting in tough lighting conditions.
It's funny because I have an A7RV and I feel the same way. I love it, but at the same time, for some reason, it is just too good. I almost get more enjoyment out of my OM-1 (the 1970 film camera) than my A7RV. I think I might just end up with a Leica M-P or something (a modern, fully mechanical film camera)
@@RickBebbington it's just kinda weird because it was basically my dream camera. I almost feel guilty for not loving it as much as I do, hah. Maybe it's just a weird case of GAS and I should just forget about it and focus on taking pictures and printing them. the A7RV is the perfect camera for me, in theory. I perfectly matches the way I shoot.
I think you’re on to something. My Sony is so capable, yet dull. I miss all the Fuji cameras I sold to ‘upgrade’ to full frame. The XT3 I had was light, fun and a joy for travel.
Smart decision to go with xt4 instead of xt5. Fuji completely destroyed AF with latest firmwares for 5th gen cameras. XT4 and XT3 are now more reliable cameras when it comes to AF than the newest ones which is so embarrassing for a company like Fuji but they obviously don’t care at all.
I’m torn between upgrading my Sony A6000 to a A7iii or moving to Fujifilm. I mainly shoot everyday photos, but also like to do some portrait and automotive shoots. Not having tried a Fujifilm would they be more than capable of the kind of photography I mentioned?
All modern cameras are capable of these types of photography IMO, but as with any camera choice it largely comes down to personal preference. You can rent Fujifilm cameras and lenses from their website for 48 hours to try it out - it's free so might be worth testing for yourself! www.fujifilm-houseofphotography.com/product-loan/
Mainly the 23mm f2 WR. I seem to be settling around that focal length as a favourite and I seldom need anything faster. Plus it's small, light and (relatively) cheap if you scout around
beautiful video work there! i really loved those locations and the way you set everything up. i'm a fuji guy as well but have been unhappy with my x-h1 and x100v for years... i'm selling both now to get an X-T4 and i will keep 2-3 lenses. that shall be it.
I do a lot of videos on my Fujis (X-T2 & X-H1), and for the most part I shot them while MANUALLY fosussing. Both Fuji's lenses and a bunch of vintage ones I own. OK, that works for me, your milage may wary. On top of that, I own two digital and 5 different camera systems plus various fixed lens cameras. Trust me, over time that chaos grows on you 😊
Or maybe, Sony is just boring as hell. I've purchased an Olympus camera several weeks ago and I've been having so much fun. It's just 20 mpix, which is more than enough in most cases, but I don't really care. It's brought me back to thinking more of composition and make the photos interesting more than anything else. I just pick it up and start shooting. It's fun.
Hah ... I adore shooting with my Sony A7R5 ... it is an amazing photography machine which imposes minimal limits on my creative expression ... to each their own.
Great video as always Rick Question: have you really downgraded your camera (and got rid of your Sony) or have you added the Fuji to your cameras and prefer it for photography?
Thanks Rob. I suppose you are correct, but that title isn't as enticing 😂 I'll always pick up the Fuji ahead of the Sony if I'm going out just to shoot images though 👍🏻
I’d have still watched a video called something like “I’ve switched to a fujifilm for my photography” … I find the click bait titles cringy and often don’t watch as a protest 😊 … you make a lot of sense though so I’ll watch your stuff whatever you call it
@@robwoodphotos Fair enough... I do get what you mean, and did consider that as a title actually. It's honestly quite hard to work out - I thought that might put off anybody with no interest in Fujifilm when I wanted my message to be more universal. Appreciate what you've said though, and thank you - that means a lot!!
@@RickBebbington yeah Rick I don’t run a RUclips channel so I can imagine it’s not easy to know to what extent to need to package things to squeeze the most out of the opportunity you’ve created for people to learn something
how do you feel about the fuji identity it kind of sells around? i am having a look at some fuji aswell to try. but there is always one thing holding me back a little: fuji is like all in on: selling this idea of film sims and stuff. i have no interest in that at all. nor do i have any interest in shooting jpg either. is fuji even worth it if you dont care about one of its main selling points?
I like the film sims but often use my own presets with the raw files it kicks out. I'm probably a bit stuck in my ways there! So yeah, its' still worth it as it's still a nice experience to shoot with as far as I'm concerned
I wonder why you didn’t get a Sony 6700. For the same investment, you could have invested in a few APS-C lenses to obtain weight savings, and kept your full frame lenses for more flexibility.
I've tried Fuji a lot but I just can't stand the AF. Love the feel, but I'm going to try the Nikon ZF I think, rather than go to Fuji. Maybe if Fuji updates their AF I'll consider moving to them.
Don't blame Sony blame yourself, why you need to carry a big lens if your not going to shoot at F1.2 indoors. The XT-4 is still a big camera that won't fit in your pocket. Buy small lenes.
For how long you will you do Fuji? Until you realize that besides taking pictures for fun, you have to do client work and see that you need more reliable camera like Sony R5.
IMHO, once you have a certain level kit, the extra features more expensive kit bring should be viewed with a very critical eye as whether they are truly necessary or luxuries that I will never use. Also, kit you will not use and becomes a shelf queen is useless kit.
But then you realise you have no auto focus. And the images that are in focus are soft. There is a big problem with fuji cameras. As much as i love them.
I just picked up the x-t5 the day before yesterday and seeing this really reinforced my thoughts. For me, not anything pro, I want it for an everyday carry
I did give a reason. I don't like shooting on my Sony so I don't feel inspired to pick it up. Size and weight is just another element in the against column.
@@RickBebbington the only thing I take away from Fuji is my appreciation for quality prime glass, and the realisation that instead of paying 1k for an apsc lens I can put that money into an a7iv and a 35mm gm and build out from their.
Why an X-T4 and not an X-T5? I decided I just didn't need the additional features, it just wasn't worth paying more for
“Our affinity with cameras should be based on how likely we are to use them, not how good they are.” Amen to that!
Thanks!!
Sony has the charme of a computer with a camera in it.
Fuji has the charme of a camera with a computer in it.
Yeah in my mind Sony is like Tesla, and Fuji is a but more like Alfa Romeo or Jaguar
Hopefully it's more reliable than an Alfa!
I went from thirty years plus of using full frame Canons to X-H2. The Canons, while being great are a bit clinical. Going from 26MP to 40 was a big thing, but once I’d transferred I just fell in love with the Fujifilm process and their colour science is -to me- superior.
Really? I went from years of Fuji to Canon and I find the Canon colors at least as good.
I absolutely agree. It doesn't matter what camera you use, the important thing is that you enjoy using it.
totally agree many moons ago i started out with a canon 6d and the trinity of lenses and a massive backpack and then one day hiking up a mountain i thought why am i packing all this gear about, i got sucked in to buying all the gear watching youtube videos telling me this is what you need and you dont. after that trip i sold it all and bought a xt2 and the 16-55 and a peak design sling and ive never looked back and used it everywhere because i can take it everywhere, i did buy the xt3 when it came out and still use it to this day it does what i need it to do, i did try the fuji x100v for a while and hated it so dont believe the hype as it may not work for you :)
I have upgraded full frame for medium format. So everything can flow in different directions for different reasons
I chose Fuji when I decided to go mirrorless in 2014. I went from full frame Canon 5d3 to a fuji XT1. I chose it because it felt most like a film camera which was my background. I loved that there was an aperture ring on the lens. And it was super easy to use the buttons and dials and not menus that's what I disliked about the Sony cameras. Eventually I sold all my Canon gear and currently I am shooting with a Fuji xt3 still. I also love my Fuji x100f and you're right it does make photography fun again
"I don't know if you've heard 'bout SquareSpace..." ROTFLOL. I get the camera-relationship thing completely! I was so disappointed when Lumix replaced the love-of-my-life G9 with a box with all the controls moved G9II. My new love is the OM-1. It should not matter that much, but things other than specs do. The G9II innerds on the old G9 body would have been stellar. The mentoring sounds like a blast, have fun! Cheers!
Just got an xpro2 in the mail this past weekend. I had the same problem with my canon system I loved it but it always felt like a chore lugging out the heavy kit. Ultimately leading me to not taking pictures for years! Now I enjoy photography again!
Great to hear!
Amen. Still miss my XPRO2 because I just looked at it and had to pick it up! I'll get another one day for personal work.
Great video, Rick, and great message. 👏🏻👏🏻 They say, the best camera is the one you have on you, but if you pack a camera and barely get it out of the bag then that is no good. I remember I only upgraded due to weather sealing, so nowadays my Nikon Z6ii, with super zoom 24-200mm and 40mm prime, is all I need to get out and be inspired. Best of luck with the X-T4. Your work with their earlier cameras, and X100, is great.
Thanks Andy, that sounds like a good combo. I think I'm better at being a bit more realistic about what I'm going to use too.... I know how infrequently I use my 70-200 for example these days, so it now mostly stays at home. Gone are the days of "oh well I *might* need that", then putting everything in my bag!
I shoot with the XT-2, when I look at my holiday, landscape and street photography I ask myself would I take better photos with the XT-5 or a full frame camera?
I look at my photos on a TV or make a photo book - and you don't need a higher resolution for either. If I were to shoot more video, then I would probably upgrade to the XT-5. The main advantage for me is simply the compact system size and the price-performance ratio.
Couldn't agree more
Would have fancied a switch from Nikon F to Fuji X and that would have been an X-T4 back then. I've always had and still have a soft spot for the brand, the colours, control scheme, smaller size and price, etc. Problem is, I wanted a high quality 24-120 and a 100-300/400 equivalent lens to start out. In the end I went with a Z6 because their versions of these zooms turned out to be quite a bit superior.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I find always interesting to hear about the gear the photographer is using as well as seeing the sample images. The camera which begs me to pick it up is Sony 7Cii with 35 and 55 Sony/Za lenses. I had Canon, Nikon, Panasonic and Fuji cameras but none of them brought me the same joy. For the first time I thought that street photography is fun. The size and performance are unmatched.
I've never tried the 7C series. Guess I don't want to really given how I feel about my existing Sony stuff for photo. Glad it's working out for you!
Love your advice. I always wonder about whether I’m supposed to be upgrading my camera. This helps set so much context around that thought. Thank you 🤩
Thanks Deepti!
I completely understand what you have been going through. I have been through the exact same process. Several different models of both Sony and Fuji. I have settled on a Fuji X-H1 and a Sony A7R2. Both are old and outdated by current standards (kind of like me 😅), but both were flagship bodies when they were originally released. And that makes them good enough for me, and both are more capable than my skillset. I enjoy both cameras equally, but when I want to take landscape photos or crop, I take the Sony. When I want beautiful colours and feel more creative, I take the Fuji. The perfect blend for my needs.
It's good to have the choice!!
Had full frame Nikon and bought fuji xt20. Over the next year, found I liked my fuji photos more - probably cos that was the one I picked up the most.... No Nikon now 😊
They're definitely a lot more pickupable!!
Totally agree on the fun of using the Fuji cameras. I love the analog dials and feel of the X-T5, I’m a retired commercial photographer with a complete Canon FF DSLR system that I rarely use😜
Re. taking on mentoring gigs... Do what you love! Go for it. I still shoot mainly Canon APS-C but in the past year I stepped all the way back to the Fujifilm X-T1. I love, love, love this camera. It sings to me. Call it my weekend hobby sports car; whatever. I really don't care about it's flaws when compared with newer gear. I enjoy its constraints, its foibles and flaws. 16 MP versus whatever, don't care. I'm having a ball. Cheers Rick. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks!
I'm shooting on Sony (a7c) and Fuji x100v as well! - and what you've described is very real. The Sony has been my Zoom (video coaching biz) and workhorse, but then you feel an itch that needs scratching and you pull out the Fuji. Thinking of giving in to a bit of GAS and going for Xpro2, we'll see. But the point about truly "seeing" - this has been my mantra, might make a video on this later. Good luck.
Yeah, it's a difficult one to justify and I'm still not 100% convinced it's the long term future.... Good luck to you too!
Good honest video, thanks Rick, I am lucky enough to be able to use 3 Canon cameras, R8,R7 and 90d all 3 are fantastic cameras! I also picked up an 1100d at a garage sale really cheap, it was very grubby and dusty but after a couple of hours of deep cleaning it looks like brand new and I am having a blast using it, I agree that if you can get great shots from a low grade camera, then you can get great shots with any camera!
It totally makes sense and I am sharing the same approach : I just bought an old Olympus to have a small and light rig always with me.
Enjoy!
I agree with this. It is why I love my Nikon zf. It makes me want to take it out and shoot photos. Even with the Nikon Z6iii out it feels boring and uninspiring because looks and feels similar to everything two before it. Nikon zf to me shows that I enjoy photography, Nikon Z6iii is like I do photography as my job and not the hobby.
I understand what you say about fun, but you also talk about size and weight, a bit strange that you show the Sony with a sigma 85mm 1.4. If you had an similar lens on the fuji (at least in terms of depth of field) it would have been the Fuji 50mm 1.0. Then the size and weight had become almost the same. It would have been better to mount sony's 40mm 2.5 on your R5, the difference in size would have been much smaller compared to the X-T4 with an f/2 lens.
Size and weight was just a factor. No matter which lens you put on the Sony, the equivalent setup on the Fuji will be smaller and lighter, but I get what you are saying. It doesn't change for me the fact that I still find the fuji much more enjoyable :)
@@RickBebbington I understand that Fuji is more enjoyable for you! And having the very latest equipment does not make you a better photographer. But I do not agree that it is just to conclude that the same equivalent setup on Fuji is smaller and lighter than the same equivalent on Sony. Two random lenses, the fuji 23mm 1.4 is a bit heavier and larger than the sony 35mm 1.8. The Fuji 50-140 2.8 is much heavier and larger than the sony 70-200 f/4 mark 2.
@@RickBebbington i think this statement is only half true about lens sizes. and its something that to me always surprises me like nothing else. You enjoy the fuji and fuji is a very old school tactile way of shooting... to me one of, if not THE selling point for a mirrorless compared to a dslr is the ability to adapt lenses and how freaking easy it is to focus because of focus peaking and such.
when i hear people say that: ''oh yeah those sony lenses are soooo big'' well it always refers to new modern lenses. slap some MF vintage glas prime on there and it becomes tiny.
i really dont get it. ''lenses so big, lenses so expensive''
you can get something like an old ai nikkor prime for like 40 bucks and its tiny. and there are so many insane value lenses out there like alot of the voigtländer ones, the helios, the nikon 135mm is a legend too.
and all you really lose is autofocus... wich doesnt matter anything because of how easy mirrorless are for mf.
yet people only talk about modern huge lenses
@@rumattsoI think it's not much the size but that Sony (and Canon) are a bit boring. Great technology and image quality. But not inspiring to shoot with. And that matters to the enjoyment. Image quality when people are displaying their work on Instagram doesn't really matter. I've started downgrading my gear a bit too. I'm having more fun shooting in a 12yo Fuji X-E1 using the straight out of camera film simulations. It's sluggish AF and only 16mo but I just want to pick it up and go for a walk. I would never had thought that I ditch shooting raw for my casual work but it's fun
I have 2 LUMIX cameras, 1 Nikon DSLR, and 3 Olympus/OM-System, in my collection along with a few others. I certainly reach for the OM-System/Olympus bodies, more often. I recently went for a walk in the Swedish countryside with both Olympus E-PL8, and LUMIX G90. The majority of photos are on the Olympus, because it is a more satisfying experience, even if the G90 is more advanced, and technically better.
I have newer Nikon model DSLRS, but lately I have truly enjoyed using an older D200 APSC camera or my D700 FF. They have lower megapixels but I don't care. There is something unique about the sensors in these cameras that produce unique colors.
I get it. I fell in love with the X-T3. I found the X-H2S to be superior for my photography event work and for video, so I have two of those bodies. I still enjoy picking up my X-T3 more.
This was a great video and topic! And I think an experience all photographers will go through at one point or another, whether your a professional or just a hobbyist.
I recently moved to Fuji after shooting Nikon DSLR's for 15+ years, and it absolutely reignited my creativity and passion for photography. And it definitely helps that I can easily carry my camera with me everyday now, which was definitely a struggle before. I don't think it's just the inherent advantages of mirrorless cameras in general, but more specifically Fuji that has helped get me back into it, with their film sims and Fuji IQ features, native lenses, and frankly the community. And yes, they just look and feel cool, and I just want to take photos with it haha. But it being mirrorless has also played a big part as my potential lens selection has now become massive, especially from all the third party manufactures making really great lenses now, but also the ability to adapt glass (and both offering great value for the money!). I shoot both Canon FD and Nikon F manual lenses and I love it. But I don't think this just applies to Fuji, it can be about any brand and photographer, if the gear you use fulfills your needs and also sparks joy then that's what matters most.
amazing video and love all the quotes. i recently did the same thing, as a canon shooter my r6mk2 with f1.2 lens was way too heavy for everyday family and street photos. i got a 4 year old m6mk2 and a few lens for the fraction of the price of a f1.2 lens and i enjoy shooting with this smaller setup much more. keep up the great work!
You could have just gotten the RF 50mm f1.8. This makes my R6MII lighter than my Fuji gear.
Thanks, appreciate it!!
Can’t agree more with you. XT4 is a great camera with enough megapixels and features for any type of shooting. Btw, I’m in process of switching to film which is even more drastic. Great video…keep them coming.
I own a Nikon D750 with a bunch of lenses, an X100V and a Leica Q3. The Q3 is the camera that I almost exclusively use. It is so much fun to use.
If you have any camera built after 2016, you can pretty much do everything and even get paid for it. A camera is just a tool. I fully agree with your approach here.
I had the same feelings between a Sony and my good old Olympus EM-1.. however the quality difference was just too big, so I said goodbye to the Oly. Using my 7 III and R IV now, just added some small lenses such as the great 28-60. Sony is about rationality, not about emotion. However I LOVE the lightroom session afterward, and after all its about the photos, not the gear, right?
have you checked out nikons instead? i feel you on Olympus and m43 to an extend. Their IQ is really lacking, due to messy their sensor is even at low iso. going for larger cameras however, i would pick a nikon over sony every single day. Its just the entire package around them. Nikon is an optics company, their camera are build like tanks, their lenses are awesome, they have a consistency in ergonomics and controls and just the pure fact how consumer oriented they are building on longlasting usage if i look back at how they kept alive F mount for 60 years.
when i think sony, i think playstations and tvs. its more like an entertainment company first. and their cameras feel exactly like that. they feel like nimble plasticy computers in your hand and i can see why a sony would not inspire anyone to go out shooting.
@@MaybeTiberius Yes, you are probably right. Have been playing with Z9 one time and it is awesome. However I have a lot of Sony lenses, including the fantastic Zeiss 2.8's, 135 1.8 et cetera so exchanging them is rather expensive. So, Maybe some day in the future when Mapcamera Tokyo has some great occasions! For now, I happily use my Sonys and keep dreaming. (And being honest, the gear is not the limitation to the photos ;) )
Ha, ha, I've just bought a second hand X-T10 as a travel/street camera - my work cameras are Sony A7Riii and many years a go I had an X-T1 so pretty similar history to you. One thing I love about Fujifilm is being able to process the raw files in-camera, why can't Sony offer this. However, none of the Fuji X cameras I really see as work cameras, they just don't seem as robust as Sony or Nikon even if the output is pro quality. Also, I've heard their repair and after service is poor.
Sony is an electronics company and they design their cameras in a no nonsense detached sort of way, using the X-T10 (with its great 16MP sensor) I could tell they consulted photographers in its design, so much better ergonomically than Sony, even the shutter sounds more pleasing. Sometimes limitations are spurs to creativity and I feel using 16MP APSC is making me approach photography differently. I now treat the full frame Sony like I used to treat my medium format camera!
I totally agree with all this. It's always a fun camera, never a work one. Unless you call these videos work....
Top stuff once again Rick. Let me know when you decide to ditch the XT4 so I can upgrade from my XT2 :)
Oh, it probably won't be long 🙄😂 thanks mate
The X100V doesn’t speak to me. I’ve wanted one. I waited a year on the waiting list before the camera was disconnected. I’m not willing to pay a premium for a camera. I bought a Sony A7C with the 35/2.8 instead.
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
I have the same setup with the a7c and zeiss 35mm f2.8!
Fair enough, you have to just go with what works for you 👍🏻
Fuji is an addiction! On the video front, the XH2s, while not inspiring, does perform as-well as the Sony IMO... But with much better color and internal ProRes 422 HQ - 10bit.
I had the XT2 and sold it for the XT4. I really like the XT4 with the exception of the flip screen. I can't justify the XT5 (Because the XH2 and XH2s are my work cameras... Along with the GFX 100s II), but the screen, improved IBIS, and increased resolution make it very tempting.
Thanks for the content and welcome to the addiction.
Cheers!
The video low light performance of the Sony is just something I can't walk away from I don't think!!
Weirdly, I prefer the screen in the X-T4 to the 5..... they need to do what Sony and Nikon are doing with their screens now. Not a reason to change again though!!
@RickBebbington very true on the Sony's low light. They absolutely own that spec... But the color and menus are so horrendously bad that I just can't go there.
The screen movement would be a nice addition to Fuji.
Cheers!
Enjoyed the video - subscribed. Great to see images from Lyme Park as an added bonus - thanks! I am really enjoying my new Fuji journey.
Thank you!
Greetings to lyme park. I sold off my Sony A7R4 for a fuji XH2. Sony was massive overkill, slow computer etc and not enough difference in image quality. I now have lovely small lenses. And photo's just as good. Plus i couldn't gel with the sony. No love.
I would like to start taking my own pictures for portraits (oil paintings) and I have no idea what a decent camera is.
If I have 500/1000 to spend, what would be a good option for me? I need to be able to shoot up close and I would like to be able to keep decent resolution if I zoom in on, for example, an eye. I saw your other vid on quality to price and I feel like I really don’t need the latest and the greatest. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated cause I’m a little stuck😂
If you can get a used Fuji X-T4 (or X-T3 or similar) and maybe a 35mm f2 wr lens, that might fit your budget and is a really strong option. It’s all subjective though, you might not like using that camera!! You can rent Fuji cameras and lenses from them from free for 48hrs, so maybe that’s worth a try first? Google Fuji rentals 👍🏻
Rick , the deciding factor must be as you said “ the enjoyability “ … look forward to seeing more photos from this camera ! Best
Thanks Art, appreciated!
I have the same passion actually, for my Sony A7RV as my interest is purely landscapes that’s the beauty about photography. Bang on point with everything, great vid Rick ❤
I've done the same and it has changed so much. Few years ago I switched from canon eos r to Sony a7iv and the Sony is the best camera I've ever owned the af is so far better than anything else I've tried and the dynamic range is insane. BUT it is uninspiring to shoot with. That lead me to shoot more film and I also got a X-T4 and more recently I stumbled on a too-cheap-to-pass x100f. I use the Sony for all my paid work but 100% of non paid work I use the Fujis.
Great video Rick and very true. I have just got back from Italy and while I used my Nikon Z8 most of the time a few times I just grabbed Jans Olympus, set it in aperture mode and used that when walking around the old towns and it was great. I also find that when you have a smaller looking camera people have no issues with you taking photos but the larger the camera some people get a bit funny.
Lighter cameras? That is why I use lumix micro four thirds!
Wish they continue GM1 line
camera doesn't matter. what matters is a brain and the ability to see.
It's not a downgrade. It's just a different sensor format 🙂
I switched from a Nikon Z50 to a Z7 II last year. And I do love this camera! But if Nikon would release an APS-C camera aimed at enthusiasts and pros, like the long rumored "Z80", I would definitely switch to that. I mainly shoot with telephoto lenses anyway and I would absolutely love an APS-C equivalent of the Z8.
Though I would keep the Z7 II as a secondary camera. The resolution is nice to have and the dynamic range is kinda nuts compared to the Z50. The files are a lot easier to work with when shooting in tough lighting conditions.
It's funny because I have an A7RV and I feel the same way. I love it, but at the same time, for some reason, it is just too good. I almost get more enjoyment out of my OM-1 (the 1970 film camera) than my A7RV.
I think I might just end up with a Leica M-P or something (a modern, fully mechanical film camera)
Thanks - seems there are a few of us feeling similar!
@@RickBebbington it's just kinda weird because it was basically my dream camera. I almost feel guilty for not loving it as much as I do, hah. Maybe it's just a weird case of GAS and I should just forget about it and focus on taking pictures and printing them.
the A7RV is the perfect camera for me, in theory. I perfectly matches the way I shoot.
I think you’re on to something. My Sony is so capable, yet dull. I miss all the Fuji cameras I sold to ‘upgrade’ to full frame. The XT3 I had was light, fun and a joy for travel.
Glad it's not just me!!
How did you get an XT4 that cheap?
ebay!! I really lucked out actually
That damn side hinged flip out rear screen though….it’ll drive you bananas.
Haha!! I don't mind it, but I guess I'm used to it from my A7SIII
Smart decision to go with xt4 instead of xt5. Fuji completely destroyed AF with latest firmwares for 5th gen cameras. XT4 and XT3 are now more reliable cameras when it comes to AF than the newest ones which is so embarrassing for a company like Fuji but they obviously don’t care at all.
I'd heard that. Seems mad not to work on this given it's something they get the most criticism for.
You have a talent for creating. Beautiful compositions!
Thank you!
Lyme park looking 🔥
I was grateful of that breeze (not sure my audio was!)
I’m torn between upgrading my Sony A6000 to a A7iii or moving to Fujifilm. I mainly shoot everyday photos, but also like to do some portrait and automotive shoots. Not having tried a Fujifilm would they be more than capable of the kind of photography I mentioned?
All modern cameras are capable of these types of photography IMO, but as with any camera choice it largely comes down to personal preference. You can rent Fujifilm cameras and lenses from their website for 48 hours to try it out - it's free so might be worth testing for yourself! www.fujifilm-houseofphotography.com/product-loan/
You should consider a A6700, a beast of an APS-c camera. The AF is some of the best you can get
Fuji is more engaging jpeg and viewfinder experience, but full frame will always win hands down for big prints and light nuances.
I went from a new A6100 to a used Fujifilm X-T20 and recently a X-T3. Absolutely zero regrets.
@@mc5869 How do you find the XT3 experience? What lenses have you paired with it?
Have you tried the A7Cii since you are already using the Sony system?
Its still a Sony...
Hey, i am shooting my xt30 II much more than my sony A7RIII aswell. What lense are you using on your xt4? Cheers
Mainly the 23mm f2 WR. I seem to be settling around that focal length as a favourite and I seldom need anything faster. Plus it's small, light and (relatively) cheap if you scout around
beautiful video work there! i really loved those locations and the way you set everything up. i'm a fuji guy as well but have been unhappy with my x-h1 and x100v for years... i'm selling both now to get an X-T4 and i will keep 2-3 lenses. that shall be it.
I do a lot of videos on my Fujis (X-T2 & X-H1), and for the most part I shot them while MANUALLY fosussing. Both Fuji's lenses and a bunch of vintage ones I own. OK, that works for me, your milage may wary.
On top of that, I own two digital and 5 different camera systems plus various fixed lens cameras. Trust me, over time that chaos grows on you 😊
You don't know the half of it 😬
@@RickBebbington Fair enough.
An interesting little camera, Rick. Like others, I'm looking forward to seeing the shots you wish to share!
Or maybe, Sony is just boring as hell.
I've purchased an Olympus camera several weeks ago and I've been having so much fun. It's just 20 mpix, which is more than enough in most cases, but I don't really care. It's brought me back to thinking more of composition and make the photos interesting more than anything else. I just pick it up and start shooting. It's fun.
It is, sadly. I'm trying to force myself to use it a bit more but I'm not getting very far! Glad you are having fun!
Hah ... I adore shooting with my Sony A7R5 ... it is an amazing photography machine which imposes minimal limits on my creative expression ... to each their own.
Glad to hear it - there's hope for me yet!! I do want to like it..... it'd make things a lot simpler!
It’s a bit like buying an Austin Healey Sprite (Exciting) rather than a Bentley (Beautifully crafted but boring to drive). Enjoy
I feel this! Good analogy.
Sums it up very well!
Had a x100f.. sold it.. had a a74.. sold it... still have my pentax q
Whoa, for a minute there I thought you said you downgraded…😂
I did something similar. I have gone through two A73's, an A7RIV, and an A7c before I settled on an xt-3 that I picked up for under $600.
Good choice!
Great video as always Rick
Question: have you really downgraded your camera (and got rid of your Sony) or have you added the Fuji to your cameras and prefer it for photography?
Thanks Rob. I suppose you are correct, but that title isn't as enticing 😂 I'll always pick up the Fuji ahead of the Sony if I'm going out just to shoot images though 👍🏻
I’d have still watched a video called something like “I’ve switched to a fujifilm for my photography” … I find the click bait titles cringy and often don’t watch as a protest 😊 … you make a lot of sense though so I’ll watch your stuff whatever you call it
@@robwoodphotos Fair enough... I do get what you mean, and did consider that as a title actually. It's honestly quite hard to work out - I thought that might put off anybody with no interest in Fujifilm when I wanted my message to be more universal. Appreciate what you've said though, and thank you - that means a lot!!
@@RickBebbington yeah Rick I don’t run a RUclips channel so I can imagine it’s not easy to know to what extent to need to package things to squeeze the most out of the opportunity you’ve created for people to learn something
Fuji has a beautiful colour science....
But agree sony cameras have a "clinical" look to them
Ione 3 Fuji cameras and I love them.
how do you feel about the fuji identity it kind of sells around? i am having a look at some fuji aswell to try. but there is always one thing holding me back a little: fuji is like all in on: selling this idea of film sims and stuff.
i have no interest in that at all. nor do i have any interest in shooting jpg either. is fuji even worth it if you dont care about one of its main selling points?
I like the film sims but often use my own presets with the raw files it kicks out. I'm probably a bit stuck in my ways there! So yeah, its' still worth it as it's still a nice experience to shoot with as far as I'm concerned
My Canon EOS 550D is too old ?
Not if you don't want it to be!
Yeah if I'd be carrying a 3,500 pound camera I'd go for something lighter too... And then they say that Medium Format is heavy and cumbersome! 😉
Haha!
I wonder why you didn’t get a Sony 6700. For the same investment, you could have invested in a few APS-C lenses to obtain weight savings, and kept your full frame lenses for more flexibility.
Because I enjoy shooting with Fujifilm cameras a lot more than Sony cameras as I outlined 👍🏻
I've tried Fuji a lot but I just can't stand the AF. Love the feel, but I'm going to try the Nikon ZF I think, rather than go to Fuji. Maybe if Fuji updates their AF I'll consider moving to them.
Fair enough. I don't see the issue with Fuji AF, guess I'm just used to it from my X100V. Plus, most of what I shoot is static...
It's better to have a small camera with you, than a big one at home 😉
the similarity to James Popsys is actually insane
It's unintended! However having been in Chile and Antarctica with James, I can confirm we do have a vey similar sense of humour!!
@@RickBebbington that’s okay bro! Cool to see how your environment impacts your content anyways
Don't blame Sony blame yourself, why you need to carry a big lens if your not going to shoot at F1.2 indoors. The XT-4 is still a big camera that won't fit in your pocket. Buy small lenes.
I wasn't blaming anyone!! and I'm not looking for something to put in my pocket 🤷🏻♂️
How is that a downgrade?
How isn't it?
For how long you will you do Fuji?
Until you realize that besides taking pictures for fun, you have to do client work and see that you need more reliable camera like Sony R5.
LOL
You struggle with video? It's still one of the best hybrid cameras.
I don't struggle with video, I just said that the Sony is much superior for video which is true.
@@RickBebbington You exactly said this sentence at 4:20 in your video, sorry.
IMHO, once you have a certain level kit, the extra features more expensive kit bring should be viewed with a very critical eye as whether they are truly necessary or luxuries that I will never use. Also, kit you will not use and becomes a shelf queen is useless kit.
Very true, thanks!
To james popsys
Not a downgrade at all😊
How are you liking that Fuji autofocus 😅
I don't mind it. Obviously miles off the Sony but I generally shoot thing that don't move, so I'm cool with it!
But then you realise you have no auto focus. And the images that are in focus are soft. There is a big problem with fuji cameras. As much as i love them.
I just picked up the x-t5 the day before yesterday and seeing this really reinforced my thoughts.
For me, not anything pro, I want it for an everyday carry
It's great for that. I love the f2 primes too - they're so small!
This just sounds like consumerism gone mad - not giving a good reason for smaller lenses instead of buying a new system is a cop out.
I did give a reason. I don't like shooting on my Sony so I don't feel inspired to pick it up. Size and weight is just another element in the against column.
@@RickBebbington a A7iv with a compact lens is not much bigger than an x-t4?
@@AStCG1989 But it is bigger 🤷🏻♂ it could be the same size and I'd still feel the same
@@RickBebbington the only thing I take away from Fuji is my appreciation for quality prime glass, and the realisation that instead of paying 1k for an apsc lens I can put that money into an a7iv and a 35mm gm and build out from their.
The AF will be disappointing on the Fuji.
Most of what I shoot is pretty static so I'm ok with it so far
"Oh but it's APSC. Full frame is better!"
😂
Video is overexposed. 0:49
It's not, but thanks
@@RickBebbington 0:49 it is
Unnecessary annoying music