Dean and Jerry Buting are the ones who I was waiting for to respond. He said what I said about the rules of the court and Wisconsin law vs. the journalism. Ken Kratz took advantage of that with his ridiculous press conferences
Tbh, I always thought Candace Owens was sound, but, after this, I’m so disappointed in her. She’s obviously *Not* done her homework! Thankyou Scott . YNWA
Dean Strang is a damn fine attorney. As he stated, he was actually there, and spent 15 months and 500 hours on the case. So, I would tend to agree with him.
The jury was also there for every minute. Dean has an agenda. The jury doesn't. Where have those 500 hours of expertise been for the last SIXTEEN years?
@lazur1 I mean they had people from the police department that was being sued by Steven Avery investigating the case when they were not supposed to, it's called a conflict of interest and that was proven and guess what they still convicted Steven. Manitowoc county is so corrupt they denied Kathleen Zellner an evidentiary hearing despite the fact she has an eye witness that spotted Bobby Dassey pushing Teresa Halbachs Rav 4 onto Steven Averys property. So yeah I 100 percent believe they had a corrupt jury as well it's not that hard when everyone else in favor of the prosecution was corrupt af.
What episode do they present the FACT that Gregory Allen was responsible for numerous viscous assaults during the years Steven was serving prison time for HIS crime. I hope they reveal that he was proven in May of 2005 to have brutally assaulting a woman in Minnesota and was subpoenaed to be extradited for trial, but Wisconsin did not respond until AFTER Steven AND Brendan were both convicted & sentenced in 2007! (NOTHING IN THE MEDIA.) My question is, why wasn't this made public at the time the depositions for the $36M lawsuit were being made? Who pulled the strings? Also why was Sherry Culhane (a clear conflict of interest) allowed to have had ANYTHING to do with the case let alone do virtually ALL of the lab work?
@@crockettthomson7784 Very good point. You would think the "Guilters" would want to find out the actual truth about the case, especially if the truth proved Steven actually did kill TH.
That does bother me about the case. I think Steven is guilty however there was so much corruption and not a fair trial. And I didn’t know till recently that woman who did the scientific tests for the trial was actually a woman who worked on his 85 rape case. That’s a major conflict of interest. Combine that the cops screwed up big time by having colborn and lenk involved in this case period. It doesn’t mean I side with Steven either I think he’s scum and is where he belongs. However law enforcement has nobody to blame but themselves that they have had to answer for all there bad behavior so many years later. Because if they had kept there hands clean and let Steven and Brendan have fair trials and they both got convicted fairly nobody would even know who those two men are and Steven would die in prison as a nobody like they wanted.
First off that county would be bankrupt after paying the lawsuit due to Steven Avery. Then every single case that those officer worked on throughout their career will be under scrutiny and it will open the largest corruption case perhaps since watergate. Hundreds of people will have to be released from prison or their records will have to be expunged because now if those officers are found to have set up Steven Avery just think of how many other people will come out with similar claims
Ohhh no that accountability from the government is a no no word. Could the cops have just done their job this whole thing wouldn't have happened and innocent people and especially the woman who was murdered still hadn't got justice. But boohoo on old cases that the cops fudged to frame Steven.
@@justinjones2103 Eww , “ Balls” What ever turns you on If she has then Dean Strang kicked her right there I reckon right at this point in time Candace Owens is regretting all alliances she has with CAM
Zellner needs to file defamation against Candace. Avery has a constitutional right to fight for his freedom & present new evidence. Once again guilty by media influence. Presumption of innocence is BS. New trial out of Wisconsin should be granted .
How can anyone with a sense of decency defend the corruption that is so obviously on display in this case. These people set out to destroy this man from the very first rape charge. Then you have mishandled evidence, keys that appear out of nowhere, how can any judge with a sane mind not see this. This case should have been thrown out to begin with but, they were hell bent on sending this man away for the rest of his life. They didn’t want to pay the lawsuit to begin with now imagine for one minute what would happen to that county if they gave him a new trial
well said! Steven never stood a chance. The truth will come out eventually and I can't wait, they'll be fireworks for sure and worldwide focus right down on Wisconsin.
Yeah the County and now the State will be in seriously deep donkey dung to put it politely if this guy wins his freedom a second time, not to mention they ruined Brendans life in order to take down Steven and his lawsuit. It's so sad for both of them.
But he called her from a blocked number*67 twice he also used his sister’s name instead of his name to have her come over to take pictures of the vehicle. There was a lot of weird stuff happening.
@@Flee-the-matrixand considering teresa had given steven at a previous photo shoot, her personal phone number, if he was trying to conceal his plan to attack or kill her, why wouldnt he have called her directly instead of calling auto trader and making it known to others? As well the van was registered to Barb, his sister, why wouldnt he give his sisters name?
Candace Owens has a history of bias confirmation. Even in her social and political commentary, she has a habit of focusing purely on elements of an issue that suit her argument. It's why I unsubscribed from her channel. She's a disappointment, not just in this documentary but overall.
Dear me..... i have said it before and will say it again.... the jury MUST have seen and heard a load of evidence to reach a guilty verdict... if the jury only had the MAM documentary to watch, he would hve been declared NOT guilty... based solely on the MAM documentary any rational person would think he was innocent... however the jury didnt think he was....
Nothing has changed my mind but I feel there is some truth to what CAM has said but I still don’t see how a man was wrongfully Convicted for 18 years and then kills someone knowing he would go back if he got caught just doesn’t sit right with me and its in the middle of his lawsuit
Right! And if he did actually do it, he would certainly try to cover it up better. Not leave the key sitting next to his slippers. Not "hide" the car on his families property 😑
What are people even arguing yet. There’s nothing convicting a murderer, yet that implies whether or not, he actually committed the crime. Just that he is in reality. A piece of crap. Doesn’t make an a murderer, but he was a real piece of crap.
Almost everyone involved in the case are pieces of crap. If nobody is willing to do a documentary on actual relevant facts, then at least give us a proper exposé. I’m over the cat in the bonfire. I want to hear more about the Steven and Barb incest.
You know what, let Candice and her gossip crew keep it up in social media. Maybe then, Netflix and Making A Murder creators WILL MAKE THE THIRD SERIES ALREADY!
Riccardi and Deimos already said they won't do a third season. They're afraid to go back to Wisconsin, then the failed lawsuit by Colborn, the hate from guilters, from the LE, etc.. They had 10 years of footage to go through so they probably do have enough material not including the new stuff found out to make a third one but don't hold your breath waiting for it.
I'm a Conservative politically, and for the most part am a strong supporter of law enforcement, but I think it's pretty damn obvious how corrupt Manitowoc County was and probably still is.
I am in it in a different name( "Not My Verbiage" or Linda from Foul play crew) Bravo Dean Roomers Hear Say is always No Say .Thank you again >Youve been doing a great job all along when covering this case
I am glad I am watching this on daily wire and I understand why a town would want to convict any Avery since they cause trouble but this is about the Theresa Halbach murder soi hope they get to the point at hand and it’s this trial not the past
I’m confused. Netflix never gave me the impression Steven didn’t have a background that was jaded or that he had never committed a violent crime previously
he has "zero interest in watching the new dailywire docuseries"? seems like he should watch it and rebut her claims thoroughly. we would all benefit from that. "i dont need a movie that runs for 10 hours to tell me about the case." i wonder if he has the same objection to the original netflix series that convicting a murderer is critisizing.
Of course, he doesn’t wanna watch it, because it’s gonna point out how bad of a job they did as Avery‘s lawyers in the very beginning. If they would’ve explored the facts and investigated everything and done their job instead of just focusing completely on the cops and thinking they could get him off then maybe they would’ve done a good job and proven who did it
Appreciate the update dates but I hate the reading I could read it all for myself if I wanted to. It would be more interesting to hear your take from your own thoughts with some script reading
When you have several people saying similiar things about Avery, it starts to add up very quickly. Add to that Avery's own tone with Jodi and other people, and it paints the clear picture. Let's be clear here 1. Earl 2. Chuck 3. Jodi 4. Chuck's ex 5. Avery's cousin 6. Avery's niece Marie 7. Avery's other niece 8. Avery's neighbors 9. Brendan 10. Avery's ex-wife 11. Avery's son 12. Avery's other son ... are all telling stories of a sexually violent man. So, essentially, people closest to him are all consistently describing a violent, sexually disturbed man. (But they are all lying?) On top of all that is Avery's own tone and words give insight to his deviance. At times not denying specific allegations, but sidestepping them or pressuring the person he is talking to to tell the story his way. Or even his own words and attitude convince you, he did these evil things.
Jodi started banging Chucky after Steve got locked up. Many of the recorded conversations make more sense when given the full context. Which CAM conveniently left out.
Earl’s “issues” that he received counseling for were diddling on his own daughters. Convenient how they forgot to mention that. His stepdaughter Marie wasn’t raped. Contrary to CAM Steven wasn’t charged because Marie admitted the relationship was consensual and they are letters and photographs to support that.
Based on listening to the Steven Avery phone conversations that I have heard so far during this show certainly lessens the sympathy I had for him in the past. I'm not talking about this in the context of a court case or the rules. I am just talking about his lack of human decency.
I like candice but she doesn't say anythimg about the secomd docuseries about the zelwig lawyer who explained pretty well what probably happened and it fits with the actual evidence...
Making a Murderer was highly emotionally manipulative, it deceived it's views by hiding Steven's more violent behavior and presenting him as a sympathetic individual who the audience could relate to and feel sympathy for. To do this they also used hearsay and rumours, they couldn't even let Avery's victims speak candidly without interrupting their story with a nobody from a bar calling her a liar. CaM is simply showing the audience the parts MaM neglected to mention or showed in a misleading way. It's pretty petty to write books and make money off one show which is mostly speculation and innuendo but the chastise the other side for saying 'here's what they left out.' Had the facts about Steven's behavior been presented honestly and people knew that Steven was torturing animals, bulling his kids, raping his niece, bashing his stepsons teeth out, beating his wife, threatening his wife to his kids in Easter cards, trying to kidnap his cousin and all of the vile things Steven has done, then it would have been harder to sell the conspiracy theory of him being framed. Because of MaM's emotional manipulation, the innocent side has adopted an 'Anyone but Steven Avery' mentality and will drag anyone's name through the mud and accuse whoever they like of some pretty horrid things, while simultaneously dismissing the behaviors of what is clearly a sociopath. Steven Avery is a sick piece of shit and he is guilty of murdering Teresa. People who think he is innocent were just tricked by film makers using tried and true conspiracy theory tactics to lead their viewers to a desired conclusion. Cam is simply triggering the emotional centers of Avery supporters again. Instead of calling it crap or hearsay or downplaying it as biased, stop and think. It is easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.
@@fayahmad9063 It's not irrelevant, CaM is showing you the things MaM didnt while it was tricking you. The evidence shown in court proved Steven was guilty. Which CaM will be getting to soon. Again, CaM is NOT a trial, it is a counter to MaM and it's misleading narratives.
It's so fascinating to me that people think this is evidence. 🤔🤔🤔I'm not denying he did those things, however, news flash 🚨 All of this was used as 'evidence' against Steven by the police when he was convicted of rape. And guess what, it turns out he didn't do it!!!! So why the fuck, would this apply to Teresa's murder?
Strang enjoyed the spotlight. He's doing his best to get it back. Famous for losing twice is good? Oh yes, any fame is good, for him, losing again'll just give him more to complain about; just spell his name right.
Dean and Jerry Buting are the ones who I was waiting for to respond. He said what I said about the rules of the court and Wisconsin law vs. the journalism. Ken Kratz took advantage of that with his ridiculous press conferences
Hasn't changed my mind about Steven Avery so far but it has made me question my opinion of Candace Owens 😬
Seriously!
Sherri I hear you Candace is proving to be cheap and nasty. I’m shocked
Same here. I liked her, and am getting very very disappointed I her 😔
Still waiting for clear evidence of who committed the murder, how and where!
There is a good chance you won’t get it because they are so focused on covering up the bullshit they did to Steven Avery
If you dont accept the clear evidence Avery did it then idk what to tell you.
@@kaineskeptic6484exactly. People like what evidence? 🤦♀️
Literally Steven avery did
Tbh, I always thought Candace Owens was sound, but, after this, I’m so disappointed in her. She’s obviously *Not* done her homework! Thankyou Scott . YNWA
Dean Strang is a damn fine attorney. As he stated, he was actually there, and spent 15 months and 500 hours on the case. So, I would tend to agree with him.
He was there when Avery did all these vile things? Wow!!
The jury was also there for every minute. Dean has an agenda. The jury doesn't. Where have those 500 hours of expertise been for the last SIXTEEN years?
@lazur1 The jury was also corrupted according to a jury member that had to leave early.
@@TheDarkhorsePurge If that was proven, this conviction’d be thrown out already..
@lazur1 I mean they had people from the police department that was being sued by Steven Avery investigating the case when they were not supposed to, it's called a conflict of interest and that was proven and guess what they still convicted Steven. Manitowoc county is so corrupt they denied Kathleen Zellner an evidentiary hearing despite the fact she has an eye witness that spotted Bobby Dassey pushing Teresa Halbachs Rav 4 onto Steven Averys property. So yeah I 100 percent believe they had a corrupt jury as well it's not that hard when everyone else in favor of the prosecution was corrupt af.
What episode do they present the FACT that Gregory Allen was responsible for numerous viscous assaults during the years Steven was serving prison time for HIS crime. I hope they reveal that he was proven in May of 2005 to have brutally assaulting a woman in Minnesota and was subpoenaed to be extradited for trial, but Wisconsin did not respond until AFTER Steven AND Brendan were both convicted & sentenced in 2007! (NOTHING IN THE MEDIA.) My question is, why wasn't this made public at the time the depositions for the $36M lawsuit were being made? Who pulled the strings? Also why was Sherry Culhane (a clear conflict of interest) allowed to have had ANYTHING to do with the case let alone do virtually ALL of the lab work?
Wow, I hadn't heard about the Minnesota case.
Great points and questions. Is anyone interested in the truth on The Guilters side ? Are you CAM ?
@@crockettthomson7784 Very good point. You would think the "Guilters" would want to find out the actual truth about the case, especially if the truth proved Steven actually did kill TH.
That does bother me about the case. I think Steven is guilty however there was so much corruption and not a fair trial. And I didn’t know till recently that woman who did the scientific tests for the trial was actually a woman who worked on his 85 rape case. That’s a major conflict of interest. Combine that the cops screwed up big time by having colborn and lenk involved in this case period. It doesn’t mean I side with Steven either I think he’s scum and is where he belongs. However law enforcement has nobody to blame but themselves that they have had to answer for all there bad behavior so many years later. Because if they had kept there hands clean and let Steven and Brendan have fair trials and they both got convicted fairly nobody would even know who those two men are and Steven would die in prison as a nobody like they wanted.
@@JEM471025 I hear you At least you recognise the questionable practice of LE Prosecutors and courts Give them a fair trial is all I / We are asking
First off that county would be bankrupt after paying the lawsuit due to Steven Avery. Then every single case that those officer worked on throughout their career will be under scrutiny and it will open the largest corruption case perhaps since watergate. Hundreds of people will have to be released from prison or their records will have to be expunged because now if those officers are found to have set up Steven Avery just think of how many other people will come out with similar claims
Ohhh no that accountability from the government is a no no word. Could the cops have just done their job this whole thing wouldn't have happened and innocent people and especially the woman who was murdered still hadn't got justice. But boohoo on old cases that the cops fudged to frame Steven.
Go Dean Strang , tell it as it was Candace you’ve been “ Schooled “
Candace was schooled? Lmao she's successful and has balls.
@@justinjones2103 Eww , “ Balls” What ever turns you on If she has then Dean Strang kicked her right there I reckon right at this point in time Candace Owens is regretting all alliances she has with CAM
@@justinjones2103
Candace will say anything to stay on social media!
Look how she defended Andrew Tate 🤔
'Schooled' by *literally*, a loser, claiming he *didn't watch* CaM. Make up your mind Dean: To *criticize* it, you need to *see* it.
Zellner needs to file defamation against Candace. Avery has a constitutional right to fight for his freedom & present new evidence. Once again guilty by media influence. Presumption of innocence is BS. New trial out of Wisconsin should be granted .
How can anyone with a sense of decency defend the corruption that is so obviously on display in this case. These people set out to destroy this man from the very first rape charge. Then you have mishandled evidence, keys that appear out of nowhere, how can any judge with a sane mind not see this. This case should have been thrown out to begin with but, they were hell bent on sending this man away for the rest of his life. They didn’t want to pay the lawsuit to begin with now imagine for one minute what would happen to that county if they gave him a new trial
well said! Steven never stood a chance. The truth will come out eventually and I can't wait, they'll be fireworks for sure and worldwide focus right down on Wisconsin.
Yeah the County and now the State will be in seriously deep donkey dung to put it politely if this guy wins his freedom a second time, not to mention they ruined Brendans life in order to take down Steven and his lawsuit. It's so sad for both of them.
But he called her from a blocked number*67 twice he also used his sister’s name instead of his name to have her come over to take pictures of the vehicle. There was a lot of weird stuff happening.
And why wouldnt Steven use his sisters name as the van was in her name?
@@Flee-the-matrixand considering teresa had given steven at a previous photo shoot, her personal phone number, if he was trying to conceal his plan to attack or kill her, why wouldnt he have called her directly instead of calling auto trader and making it known to others? As well the van was registered to Barb, his sister, why wouldnt he give his sisters name?
Is all gossip and speculation
Thanks scott this one I missed.
Jerry Buting tweeted it out yesterday that’s how I saw it.
Candace Owens has a history of bias confirmation. Even in her social and political commentary, she has a habit of focusing purely on elements of an issue that suit her argument. It's why I unsubscribed from her channel. She's a disappointment, not just in this documentary but overall.
I've only seen the first episode of CaM. It does go a little deeper into the bar break-in that MaM made seem like almost more of a prank than a crime.
Dear me..... i have said it before and will say it again.... the jury MUST have seen and heard a load of evidence to reach a guilty verdict... if the jury only had the MAM documentary to watch, he would hve been declared NOT guilty... based solely on the MAM documentary any rational person would think he was innocent... however the jury didnt think he was....
Nothing has changed my mind but I feel there is some truth to what CAM has said but I still don’t see how a man was wrongfully Convicted for 18 years and then kills someone knowing he would go back if he got caught just doesn’t sit right with me and its in the middle of his lawsuit
Right! And if he did actually do it, he would certainly try to cover it up better. Not leave the key sitting next to his slippers. Not "hide" the car on his families property 😑
Just heard on foul play tonight that they have the call Colburn called in somone in back ground said the car is here
@ronikaclack7521 HOLY FUCKKKK. If it's true that would be AWESOME 👌
He's a sociopath. Plenty of criminals do stupid things thinking they were going to get away with it.
@kaineskeptic6484 Well Steven has a long history of NOT getting away with stupid things he's done.
What are people even arguing yet. There’s nothing convicting a murderer, yet that implies whether or not, he actually committed the crime. Just that he is in reality. A piece of crap. Doesn’t make an a murderer, but he was a real piece of crap.
Almost everyone involved in the case are pieces of crap. If nobody is willing to do a documentary on actual relevant facts, then at least give us a proper exposé. I’m over the cat in the bonfire. I want to hear more about the Steven and Barb incest.
Have you watched “33 times Making a Murderer 2 deceived it’s viewers “? This is mind blowing
You know what, let Candice and her gossip crew keep it up in social media. Maybe then, Netflix and Making A Murder creators WILL MAKE THE THIRD SERIES ALREADY!
Riccardi and Deimos already said they won't do a third season. They're afraid to go back to Wisconsin, then the failed lawsuit by Colborn, the hate from guilters, from the LE, etc..
They had 10 years of footage to go through so they probably do have enough material not including the new stuff found out to make a third one but don't hold your breath waiting for it.
I think is CAM is pro WI LE so far!
I'm a Conservative politically, and for the most part am a strong supporter of law enforcement, but I think it's pretty damn obvious how corrupt Manitowoc County was and probably still is.
I am in it in a different name( "Not My Verbiage" or Linda from Foul play crew) Bravo Dean Roomers Hear Say is always No Say .Thank you again >Youve been doing a great job all along when covering this case
I am glad I am watching this on daily wire and I understand why a town would want to convict any Avery since they cause trouble but this is about the Theresa Halbach murder soi hope they get to the point at hand and it’s this trial not the past
"spooke oot aboot " 😍 love it .
Keep on keepin on New Scott
Good points. Seems odd that so many efforts are made by Dailywire to go over items that were already considered as inadmissible in a court.
I’m confused. Netflix never gave me the impression Steven didn’t have a background that was jaded or that he had never committed a violent crime previously
Love Dean Strang!!
On one hand he claims he won't watch CaM, then claims it only adds gossip & rumors. Can't be both, Dean. Make up your mind.
I have that exact tank top at home.
Good taste haha
Fine, try him again, *_1_* condition: You lose, you're executed. Accept?
he has "zero interest in watching the new dailywire docuseries"? seems like he should watch it and rebut her claims thoroughly. we would all benefit from that. "i dont need a movie that runs for 10 hours to tell me about the case." i wonder if he has the same objection to the original netflix series that convicting a murderer is critisizing.
❤
You really think a Batman sign needs to share the screen with you?
Of course, he doesn’t wanna watch it, because it’s gonna point out how bad of a job they did as Avery‘s lawyers in the very beginning. If they would’ve explored the facts and investigated everything and done their job instead of just focusing completely on the cops and thinking they could get him off then maybe they would’ve done a good job and proven who did it
I was able to watch 1&2 but can’t get 3 or more
They are on the Daily Wire Plus app.
Appreciate the update dates but I hate the reading I could read it all for myself if I wanted to. It would
be more interesting to hear your take from your own thoughts with some script reading
When you have several people saying similiar things about Avery, it starts to add up very quickly. Add to that Avery's own tone with Jodi and other people, and it paints the clear picture.
Let's be clear here
1. Earl
2. Chuck
3. Jodi
4. Chuck's ex
5. Avery's cousin
6. Avery's niece Marie
7. Avery's other niece
8. Avery's neighbors
9. Brendan
10. Avery's ex-wife
11. Avery's son
12. Avery's other son
... are all telling stories of a sexually violent man. So, essentially, people closest to him are all consistently describing a violent, sexually disturbed man. (But they are all lying?)
On top of all that is Avery's own tone and words give insight to his deviance. At times not denying specific allegations, but sidestepping them or pressuring the person he is talking to to tell the story his way. Or even his own words and attitude convince you, he did these evil things.
Jodi started banging Chucky after Steve got locked up. Many of the recorded conversations make more sense when given the full context. Which CAM conveniently left out.
Earl’s “issues” that he received counseling for were diddling on his own daughters. Convenient how they forgot to mention that. His stepdaughter Marie wasn’t raped. Contrary to CAM Steven wasn’t charged because Marie admitted the relationship was consensual and they are letters and photographs to support that.
He is a vile POS. It's blatantly obvious he killed Teresa. There is no coherent explanation for the evidence other than him being guilty.
Dang! I wish I could watch it!
Is Daily Wire Plus available in your area?
Spoke ooooot aboooooot
Based on listening to the Steven Avery phone conversations that I have heard so far during this show certainly lessens the sympathy I had for him in the past. I'm not talking about this in the context of a court case or the rules. I am just talking about his lack of human decency.
Ryan Hillegas sospechoso,aquella noche no tenía cuartada!
Dean strang pretending to care 🤦 give me a break
I like candice but she doesn't say anythimg about the secomd docuseries about the zelwig lawyer who explained pretty well what probably happened and it fits with the actual evidence...
I thought we would see facts. Nothing new here
Not yet anyway. Just the same stuff we already know so far.
@@newscott Yepp!!
Making a Murderer was highly emotionally manipulative, it deceived it's views by hiding Steven's more violent behavior and presenting him as a sympathetic individual who the audience could relate to and feel sympathy for. To do this they also used hearsay and rumours, they couldn't even let Avery's victims speak candidly without interrupting their story with a nobody from a bar calling her a liar.
CaM is simply showing the audience the parts MaM neglected to mention or showed in a misleading way.
It's pretty petty to write books and make money off one show which is mostly speculation and innuendo but the chastise the other side for saying 'here's what they left out.'
Had the facts about Steven's behavior been presented honestly and people knew that Steven was torturing animals, bulling his kids, raping his niece, bashing his stepsons teeth out, beating his wife, threatening his wife to his kids in Easter cards, trying to kidnap his cousin and all of the vile things Steven has done, then it would have been harder to sell the conspiracy theory of him being framed.
Because of MaM's emotional manipulation, the innocent side has adopted an 'Anyone but Steven Avery' mentality and will drag anyone's name through the mud and accuse whoever they like of some pretty horrid things, while simultaneously dismissing the behaviors of what is clearly a sociopath.
Steven Avery is a sick piece of shit and he is guilty of murdering Teresa. People who think he is innocent were just tricked by film makers using tried and true conspiracy theory tactics to lead their viewers to a desired conclusion.
Cam is simply triggering the emotional centers of Avery supporters again. Instead of calling it crap or hearsay or downplaying it as biased, stop and think. It is easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.
That’s all irrelevant though, becuase he’s a bad person does not mean he killed theresa. Horrible series with no evidence
@@fayahmad9063 It's not irrelevant, CaM is showing you the things MaM didnt while it was tricking you.
The evidence shown in court proved Steven was guilty.
Which CaM will be getting to soon.
Again, CaM is NOT a trial, it is a counter to MaM and it's misleading narratives.
Well stated
It's so fascinating to me that people think this is evidence. 🤔🤔🤔I'm not denying he did those things, however, news flash 🚨 All of this was used as 'evidence' against Steven by the police when he was convicted of rape. And guess what, it turns out he didn't do it!!!! So why the fuck, would this apply to Teresa's murder?
@@yourcommentmakesmecomment.3423 His past behavior wasn't used in the Teresa trial.
It also wasn't why I was saying he was guilty.
What do you think he would say. They left out facts in the Netflix special. FACTS. and you people follow like good
Little sheep.
Strang enjoyed the spotlight. He's doing his best to get it back. Famous for losing twice is good? Oh yes, any fame is good, for him, losing again'll just give him more to complain about; just spell his name right.
of course he doesn't want to watch it, it's going to make him look like a fool for defending the murderer
It’s deff interesting, I was thinking they both were innocent, but now I am more undecided….
Yeah, he’s still guilty.