It's another one of those things that is all in the script, but you probably have to watch a few times to pick up. Lorraine's dad says *another* one of these kids jumped in front of his car, implying that it's not the first time it's happened - we then find out that Lorraine is deep in the "boy-crazy" phase of teenage life, and that implies she's not all that bothered about being seen - and some of the guys know it. Point is, teenagers do crazy things because of their raging hormones, and that was just as true in the '50s as it is now, despite their protestations otherwise!
@@joehoy9242 Right. "Another one of these kids..." The word is probably out that Lorraine undresses with her blinds up, and there's a convenient tree outside her window. She might be putting on regular shows - fully aware of what she's doing, yet still maintaining "plausible deniability".
Yeah, the characters started with flaws but ended up better versions of themselves. That's why the movie is taught in filmmaking schools, the script is close to perfect with the character development and all. George started a cowardly insecure peeping Tom. His only motivation for dating Lorraine is Darth Vader's threat to melt his brain but it was his genuine care for Lorraine that made him face Biff. Even Marty transformed, at the end he's holding a package of his demo tape for the record companies, meaning he's more confident of his talents.
There's a term in cinema called "A Perfect Movie". Back to the Future is one of those movies. The reason is because of all the setup and payoff moments throughout; those little points of interest that seem mundane but later inform, compliment or overall affect the characters, plot and story, bringing everything full circle. A Perfect Movie.
@@manvirshergill1739 they're not actually perfect there's just a term used in Hollywood for certain movies that beat a prerequisite basic criteria set fourth by Movie Makers and critics. the term itself is not to be taken literally
@@omgbygollywow according to Tarantino he described the perfect movie as being something that can fit say formula, it may not be your cup of tea but it makes the criteria. Some movies which he mentioned would-be Jaws, The Exorcist, Annie Hall, and Young Frankenstein
About the Peeping Tom thing. The window shade was up while she was undressing. And after her father hits George he says “ANOTHER one of these kids jumped in front of my car. Which means she knows she is putting on a show for all the boys in town, and several have fallen out of the tree. In the 1950s they didn’t have Internet porn they had in the tree porn.
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching when you watch the second movie, at the end it says "To Be Concluded..." You should probably hit stop because it starts showing scenes from part 3. You might not want spoilers.
The problem is when they made this movie it was not planned to be a huge hit. The producers looked at it as just another teen comedy with a couple of TV stars and hoped it would make a small profit for them. The ending with Doc coming back and yelling about their kids was truly meant as a joke. "Yeah right. Like we're gonna make a sequel. Sure."
Crispen Glover didn't like the end to this movie because he felt it was saying "money solves all of your problems," when: a) it wasn't the money, it was George developing confidence in himself and learning to like himself, and not letting people walk all over him, the money was a side effect, and b) money may not solve all problems, but if you grew up struggling for it, you know it makes a HUGE difference. I've literally seen reactors who know this and grew up this way, cry when they see that Marty gets the truck. It tells me that Crispen Glover has never had to struggle like this, and you don't realize how hard it is until you've had to do things like make the choice between eating and rent, or worse...
1:39 Michael J. Fox was 23 when he played the 17-year-old Marty McFly in this film. He turned 24 between the wrapping of filming and the film's initial release date.
When you watch the 2nd one turn the movie of after To Be Concluded comes up. The filmed part 3 at the same time and a trailer of sorts plays to hype up part 3. No spoilers before seeing it yourself
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching And stop the playback the INSTANT you see the "To Be Concluded." It jumps into spoilers REALLY fast, while the music is still playing.
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching I never thought is was an odd choice until your comments. Now I'm wondering, "So, why would Libyan terrorists use a VW van? Was that the only thing that the airport Rent-A-Car had?"
@@KevinSchmitt77 this is a stretch, but it might be because many Arab organizations and countries were aligned with the Nazis during an after World War II. Perhaps this is the brand of vehicle they're most familiar with ?
I love it when George stands up to his bully and gets the girl. For someone who awkward and outout of place in school who got bullied alot, I can relate
🎶 "That's The Power Of Love!" 🎶 Fun Fact: The judge who stands up to say that Marty (Michael J. Fox) is "just too darn loud" is Huey Lewis, whose songs "The Power Of Love" and "Back In Time" are featured in this movie. Automobile Enthusiast Fact: Writers Bob Gale and Robert Zemeckis actually received a fan letter from John DeLorean after the film's release, thanking them for immortalizing his car. Small Connection Fact: When Lorraine follows Marty (Michael J. Fox) back to Doc's house, she and Doc exchange an awkward greeting. This marks the only on-screen dialogue that Christopher Lloyd and Lea Thompson ever have, though they have appeared together in six movies. Historical Fact: Apparently, Ronald Reagan was amused by Doc Brown's (Christopher Lloyd) disbelief that an actor like him could become President, so much so that he had the projectionist stop and replay the scene. He also seemed to enjoy it so much that he even made a direct reference of the film in his 1986 State of the Union address: "As they said in the film Back To The Future (1985), 'Where we're going, we don't need roads.'"
I wonder how many people would recognize the name of the various presidents if you went to a time 30 years before they were president. In the very early days the presidents had been prominent in the American Revolution, so they would probably be recognized. I think Donald Trump was famous 30 years earlier as a wealthy real estate developer. Biden was a fairly prominent Senator who had campaigned for president in 1987 (and had to withdraw because he'd lied about various parts of his background). If you went back to the late 70s and said George Bush was president in the late 00s, people might recognize the name and think you're talking about his father, who was the former head of the CIA. But I think that's about it. For most of American history, the reaction would be something along the lines of "Bill Clinton? Who the hell is that?"
Fell in love with your personality instantly. Subscribed here and joined your Patreon. People's opinions differ on the order of greatness, but the whole trilogy is a must-watch for everyone. Most iconic time travel movies of all time. Thank you!
okay i just subscribed ... thoroughly enjoyed your reaction ... keep making it fun to watch you and your channel is sure to compete with the best of them
In regards to recognizing Marty ... I don't remember anyone that I only knew for a week in HS no matter what effect they had on me. But again it's a movie too about time travel so our minds need be a bit open 😉 great reaction as always hermosa ❤️
The idea that "Darth Vader" had a bigger impact on George (notice the front cover of his book) than this high school guy he knew for a blink of an eye makes sense. I'm more skeptical about if Lorraine would forget parking in a car and kissing a guy who reminds her of her brother. It's possible, though. My memories of high school aren't crystal clear as time and other subsequent important life events have dimmed or erased them.
There’s also a concept of contextual recognition, where you recognize someone based on your present context. Perhaps, since I have prosopagnosia, it is more obvious (since I have to rely on context more than faces to recognize people). Basically, because George and Lorraine would not expect their son to have been their strange friend 30 years earlier, they do not recognize him as such. Is the same concept of walking past a coworker when you’re visiting another place where you don’t expect him to be (I was once on an airplane with my boss (I saw him wearing a shirt with the company logo on it) but we didn’t recognize each other. I didn’t realize who it was until I was on the connecting flight.
As Doc says, people aren't thinking 4th dimensionally when they ask that question. What exactly would his parents do with the information of Marty looking like Calvin Klein? At what point would they even notice the similarity? Who's to say they didn't have a big fight 3 or 4 years prior because George was suspicious that Marty wasn't his? For some reason, everyone expects that when Marty travels back to the future, that somehow his parents will just suddenly notice the similarities. But the reality is that they would have noticed for quite some time, and I severely doubt their first thought would be "Calvin Klein was our son from the future!" And hell, even if that is where their minds went, I'm sure they would know better than to interfere with destiny. So they would pretend not to know, even if they did. Regardless, his parents noticing or not noticing would make no material difference in the way they would treat him in that scene.
It was also the simple fact that George and Lorraine grew up with Marty, and so saw his looks gradually change. They didn’t just suddenly run into this teenager who looked just like the teenager from 30 years before. So if the parents had thought about it, they would have long ago laughed it off. Or maybe George suspected Lorraine of looking “Calvin” up years later.
Watching the entire trilogy is worth it. They all follow the same premise to a degree: Doc and Marty time travel; They mess something up in the timeline; And the Delorean breaks down - it was never well built.
The father says "Another one of these damn kids jumped in front of my car" ... which means George isn't the first kid to fall out of that tree while watching Lorraine change in front of an OPEN Window! I don't blame George for peeping ... he just accepted Lorraine's VERY Generous Open Window invitation.
I never thought about a simple answer of Marty: "Sorry Lorraine, but I have a girlfriend". But it's Hollywood and we must extend the movie for other 20 minutes...
Hello Deashas! Shout Out from the US Marine Corps! You are absolutely adorable! Found your channel not too long ago and can't wait to watch more movies with you! You are the first one that finally answered the two questions that I have always said about this movie how do they not recognize their future son as the Marty that helped them get together and on top of that lightning could strike any time in that one minute I don't want to nitpick but God finally somebody asked those two questions I've been asking since I was a little kid. I saw these movies in theaters when I was a kid my father would bring me. Is one of the most epic trilogies of all time like Star Wars 4, 5, and 6. Anyways
I dont think that George & Lorraine really thought much about the similiarity. They saw "Calvin" for a week in 1955 and then they never saw "Calvin" again. I don't think that in 1985, they thought about how their 17yo son looked like a guy they saw for a week 30 years ago. That's not how memory works.
Fun fact: the guy who played the principal/teacher also played as Commander Tom “Strider” Jardian in the first Top Gun. Literally is seen in the first 15 minutes where he tells Goose and Maverick “they’re going to “Top Gun”.
Subscribed! Turn off #2 when you see “To Be Concluded”, or you’ll watch a spoilery trailer for #3. And please keep in mind that the “future” for #2 is not the filmmakers making predictions of what life would be like, they were just trying to make an entertaining movie.
Zemekis also directed Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Contact both are also great movies, Roger Rabbit is even better than great and it's amazing in how they did the effects!!! Also, there are Roger Rabbit Easter Eggs in Back to the Future, Part II.
12:09 "What age do you have to be to be in the middle of the street?" It was the 1950's and this was a quiet, residential neighborhood. _Younger_ kids, around 8 to 12 years old, I think, would set up _games_ in the street. They were fairly _simple, straightforward_ games, and it was presumed that they would be able to get all the paraphernalia involved in the game out of the street whenever a _car_ came along.
Exactly part one is Marty's parents story... although originally the To Be Continued...thing was actually a joke due to that period of time in the 80's, they never actually were going to make any sequels...but, the demand was big enough so they did. I'm glad they did. 😊
3:09 Even in 1985 California where the movie takes place, it was illegal to have an open container in a car. Drinking beer while driving was a definite no-no. Biff had balls.
When I was a kid in the 1960s, kids still had homemade wooden go-karts. Marty "invents" the skateboard here by pulling the sides off the kid's go-kart. (I saw this movie in a movie theater when it first was released; in 1985 I turned 29 years old. This film truly is a classic and makes me miss the 1980s. (Having been born in 1956 I still vaguely rember the era of tail-fin cars, also.) By 1985 had seen Michael J. Fox in the TV sitcom "Family Ties" (in which he's a conservative Republican supporter of then-President Ronald Reagan and disagrees philosophically with his ex-hippie parents, with whom he lives along with his 2 sisters) and Christopher Lloyd in the sitcom "Taxi" (in which he's one of the cast of several taxi drivers; who's an eccentric, much like Doc.) Both shows are probably represented on RUclips, in case you're interested in seeing these actors' career histories. Family Ties is still in cable-TV reruns.
Fox was 21 or 22, when he did this; he was close enough to teenage years. That, and his height, made him look quite young. It's "gigawatts," but the writers weren't science-savvy, so they went to a seminar, and the German scientist pronounced it "jigawatts," so they believed that's how it's *always* pronounced, so they wrote it that way. It's the gif/jif argument, but from the 1980s.
Trivia regarding Marty’s parents, not recognizing him: There is a stripped it, but I’m shot scene where George his father looks at an old picture from the dance, and then looks at Marty and realizes what happened.
23:31 in 1955, you couldn’t buy saucy pictures if you were under 21. Films existed, but you generally had to go to a theater, and again, they would card you. George was only 17, so he had to content himself with the live-action stuff.
The Back to the Future trilogy is like just one complete story to me. I can't see only watching one movie without the others, it is like only watching the first act of a movie then leaving. I recommend watching the complete trilogy! All 3 movies are great, people all have their favorite and debate which one is best, but almost everyone agrees all 3 movies are good or great.
It's like only watching "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring". The story continues in the next two movies so if you only watch the first one you miss out on the way the story is supposed to be enjoyed.
The joke about Jack Benny being the Secretary of the Treasury was actually very good. Jack Benny’s meme was that he was the cheapest man in Hollywood. One sketch had him dictating a letter to the Diamond Almond Company about how dissatisfied he was with their product-while he was eating the almonds he was “complaining” about-so they would send him a free can (to be fair, almonds were expensive back then). When he got done, he asked his secretary if she needed the address, and she said, “I’ll just send it to the same place I sent all the other letters.”
They had to put prosthetics on Lea Thompson and Crispin Glover in order for them to play Marty’s parents because they are the same age as Michael J Fox
The question of, "Where was Einstein during that minute?" is a somewhat complex question, but it boils down to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (the physicist, not the dog). That is, the answer to your question depends on your frame of reference. From Einstein's frame of reference, there was no "somewhere else;" he traveled instantly from 1:20 AM to 1:21 AM. However, what has actually happened is that the Flux Capacitor has "stopped time" for the DeLorean and it's occupants. In effect, Einstein is suspended in time until 1:21 AM; it's sort of like when you're unconscious - you have no sense of lost time; the time you're unconscious seems to pass instantaneously. From Doc & Marty's frame of reference, the DeLorean vanishes because for the 1 minute, it exists outside of spacetime. It reappears at 1:21 AM when the Flux Capacitor reinstates it in spacetime. In other words, from their frame of reference, the DeLorean _doesn't exist_ for one minute. This is why the DeLorean is iced over upon it's return; any moisture on the surface would freeze instantly because there's no heat or energy outside of spacetime. Regarding Lorraine and George recognizing their son as "Calvin Klein": The answer is "no." Many people reacting to this film ask this question. Try to remember that you and I (the viewers) are skipping over 30 years' worth of events. For Lorraine and George, "Calvin" was some kid who showed up for 1 week while they were in high school, helped them out a bit, then disappeared out of their lives. Lorraine and George graduated, went to college, got married, had kids, got jobs, etc, etc...they would've forgotten the details of that week over those 30 years. Secondly, if you were to ask Lorraine or George in 1985, they would insist there is no similarity between their son Marty and Calvin because no matter your age, your parents always see you as they way you looked when you were a child. So Lorraine and George would see Marty as a child, while they'd see Calvin as a peer.
As someone growing up in the '50's, they really nailed EVERY nuance on how things were different back then. (Of course, the movie was made by people who also dated back.) They captured details about life back then which had gradually changed over the years, so gradual, living through them made one forget how it was. On the other hand, while the plot line of the sequels were also excellent, their idea of life 30 years later, i.e., 2015, is really way off. We never got flying cars and the concept of the internet was not even being considered, at least in terms of its effects on everything.
I mean, for Part II, that _is_ the point. They've talked about how other depictions of the future never get it right, and almost immediately become dated; and decided to intentionally lean into it.
😎👍 Michael J. Fox and Lea Thompson (who played his mother) were both 24 when this film was made. Using actors in their mid 20s to play teenagers was extremely common throughout the 20th century. That and the fact that (as you pointed out) George and Lorraine's son grew up to be their old friend Marty are among many things one simply has to overlook to enjoy this series. Like the fact that time machine goes from only being able to run on plutonium to being able to run on garbage within a very short timespan. In the 3rd entry of the series, the whole topography of the town they live in completely changes, and suddenly, it's in the middle of a desert.😵💫
Believe it or not, there was no sequel planned. The movie was such a huge hit they decided to make 2 more. One of the best trilogies ever, along with Indiana Jones and Star Wars.
The original ending was originally intended to be just a joke. When they made the film they had no idea just how successful it was going to become, never mind that it became one of the most beloved films of all time. Its success is what ultimately led to the two sequels (which were filmed back-to-back). Personally I find _Back to the Future Part II_ (1989) to be the weakest of the trilogy - not that it is bad (far from it); to me it is just not *as* good as the other two and it can be a bit confusing, although there is still plenty to enjoy about it and technically it is very impressive considering the time that it came out. _Back to the Future Part III_ (1990), while not *quite* up to the standards of the first film, is still very good indeed. In February 2020 there was the global premiere of _Back to the Future: The Musical,_ the stage musical adaptation of the first film, in Manchester, here in the UK. I went to see it at the Adelphi Theatre in London in June of last year and I am really glad I did because it is a great way to retell a familiar story with a different medium. I treated my mum to it last month by paying for her ticket and she enjoyed it so much that she wants to see it again and treat one of her friends to the entry ticket for it later on this year. She thought that the DeLorean absolutely stole the show and it was so clever the way they made the car look like it was travelling along long roads (making great use of the turntable on the stage). The two people who adapted the film for the stage were none other than the two Bobs who wrote the original film: Robert Zemeckis (who, as you noticed, was also the director of the original film) and Bob Gale. Alan Silvestri not only allowed the use of music he had already composed for the film, but also he came back on board to help write some new songs unique to the stage adaptation (although the stage version does still contain the songs _The Power of Love, Back in Time, Earth Angel_ and _Johnny B. Goode_ - they had a licence to include all four of those as well). Admittedly some changes had to be made in order for it to work on the stage (for instance, Doc no longer has a dog, and instead of Libyan terrorists murdering Doc he gets poisoned by the plutonium he loads into the car. These two changes are no surprise because a dog would have been frightened by the lights and sound effects, especially the loud bangs and vibrant flashes when the car time-travels. Also, removing the Libyans meant that they didn't have to worry about having to deal with two vehicles on stage; it was probably enough of a challenge with just the one!). However, for the eagle-eyed viewers the stage adaptation is littered with several Easter Eggs, some of which reference the films.
Just came across your channel and subscribed. Loved your reaction, and you seemed to pick up on things that a lot of other reactors really didn't which is nice. I also just love your vibe as a person. As most people mentioned, when talking about the "perfect movie" this is one of the candidates. So much so that this is pretty much a staple in film school and is talked about in one way or another. To add a couple of things, it's also worth sharing that when you watch BTTF 2 you should be prepared for an actress change in who's playing Jennifer. Claudia Wells mother was diagnosed with cancer and she stepped away. In the second film it's Elisabeth Shue, who you would definitely recognize as Stillwell from The Boys. There was no plans for a sequel when they made BTTF, and so on top of having to recast an actress, they had to refilm the ending to the first film. Robert Zemeckis(director) said that if he'd known there would be a sequel, he wouldn't have involved Jennifer at all. There's a whole bunch of trivia involved with this movie like Michael J. Fox being the second actor to play Marty, or why Crispin Glover (Marty's dad, George) isn't in the sequels, or what Michael J. Fox's schedule looked like filming this movie. You asked about watching a breakdown video, and honestly I'm not sure. You did pick up on some stuff I don't think some really did. On the other hand, there are a ton of setups and payoffs in this movie and different details between the past/future that you may have missed. There also might be tidbits like the Marty replacement discussed. It could possibly be a thing you watch and record and then decide on your own if you feel as if you learned a lot? I don't know, I'm not a streamer.
The clock strike is glossed over, but its plausible that Hill Valley historians determined it was struck exactly at the stroke of 10:04 based on how the inner workings of the clock were stopped at. That info would've been passed on through the legend and made it into the pamphlet that the lady gave Marty, thats why Doc reads "At precisely..."
"How many times in 60 seconds can lightning strike? Don't they have to get it precise?" I mean the general answer is "It's a movie, try not to think about it too much" but my headcannon is that Doc built some kind of capacitor or similar to hold the charge for a minute. Loved your reaction!
I think you mean head canon, although I find the idea of a head-mounted cannon amusing. And they were told that the lightning struck precisely at 10:04 PM, not "around 10:04" and not "between 10:04 and 10:05."
Never stop enjoying seeing people reacting to Loraine hitting on her son, or the moment they realise the importance of the clock tower and the bolt of lightning. I liked your insight and reactions
Some Back to the Future Easter Eggs: In one of Back to the Future's most celebrated Easter eggs, Twin Pines Shopping Center (truly Puente Slopes Shopping Center in Industry, California) gets to be Solitary Pine Shopping Center after the film, calling back to the minute that Marty crashed down one of Farmer Peabody's pines with the DeLorean in 1955. Whereas the destiny of Back to the Future's Libyans is vague within the film, Doc's to begin with the occasion of getting shot by them gives watchers a small foretelling. Take note that Doc's bullet holes aren't dying. Perhaps typically chalked up to the PG rating, but still, getting shot close-range by a machine weapon would create something. Either way, in conclusion, it's uncovered that Doc wore a bulletproof vest. Is he wearing the bulletproof vest here, or is this not the correct timeline? Let's take off that to the time travel specialists.Doc Brown's house at 1640 Riverside Drive is actually a popular property in Pasadena, California. This is the "Gamble House", once owned by David and Mary Gamble of the famous "Proctor and Gamble." The house's interior is actually that of Robert R. Blacker, as filming inside the Gamble house is prohibited.
Other times one of them or both reprised the roll and documentaries on the films Back to the Future: Doc Brown Saves the World Donald Trump's The Art of the Deal: The Movie A Million Ways to Die in the West Huey Lewis and the News: The Power of Love The 1990 Earth Day Special (only found on youtube never saved to DVD) Expedition: Back to the Future (TV Mini Series 2021) HUVr: BELIEF with Christopher Lloyd and Tony Hawk The Making of the Back to the Future 2 The Making of the Back to the Future Trilogy Documentary the movies that made us back to the future Minty Comedic Arts 10 Things You Didn't Know About Back ToThe Future Marty McFly & Doc Brown Visit Jimmy Kimmel Live October 21, 2015: Celebrate 'Back to the Future' Day The Future Is Now! - A Special Message From Doc Brown Back To The Future Celebration : Inside Doc Brown's Mansion / Gamble House Myth & Mogul: John DeLorean off topic I would also love a reaction to From Star Wars to Jedi The Making of a Saga
I loved your reaction, thank you!!!! I needed it after one of the worst nights of my lonesome and miserable life... Have an excellent day and I'm saaaacribing😊😊😊
Hey I'm really happy that I could brighten your night. Lonesomeness sucks and happens to alot of us, I also watch some of my favorite youtubers when I'm feeling alone
1. Cranky principal Strickland/James Tolkan also played the ship's squadron leader in "Top Gun". 2. The teacher that tells Marty, "I'm afraid you're just too darn loud" is Huey Lewis himself. (Heart of rock and roll) 3. Eric Stoltz was first cast as Marty, but he didn't play well with others and was fired. Some of his long shots are still in the movie. 4. The flammable material set on fire with the model exercise had to have been put there on purpose. 5. It's always fun to see how people react to the Marty and his mom car scene. 🤣 6. George McFly/Crispin Glover didn't like that the story ended with the family being prosperous. 7. IMVHO part II is the best of the trifecta. 8. If you want a first time/share of an OUTSTANDING movie where Christopher Lloyd plays the heavy you must do "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".
18:16 "I guess. But they gave you a _time;_ an hour and a minute. In 60 seconds, how many times could lightning strike?" 😳 Oh. You know, I've picked apart a _lot_ of technical details with this movie to find mistakes, and seen plenty of reactions from _other_ people, doing the same. You're the first one to spot that particular _one,_ though. And that's a good point. The clock has been stopped at 10:04, but how precise is that? You're right. 60 seconds is quite a long span of _time,_ especially from the perspective of a _lightning_ strike.
I was interested in this video because it's on one of my favorite movies of all time, but the Pride merch in the background convinced me to sub immediately. Hell yeah.
The thing is... Doc DIDN'T know about him getting shot in the beginning segment of the film because Marty going into the past hadn't happened yet. So yes, Doc died in 1985. When Marty travels back in time, things haven't happened yet for him and the surrounding events of wherever he is unless he's already been there. It's confusing,... I know.
24:03 I think it's more that teenagers do lots of creepy stuff, and you can't really hold it against them 30 years later. George was a creepy peeping tom, but he's a nice guy now. Also, part of the reason he was spying on Lorraine is he didn't have the confidence to actually approach her or any other girl. That changed in this movie.
8:49 Marty left 1985 on October 26th at 01:35am. Doc set the time machine for 6am on 11/12/55 which is why Marty wound up in the early morning daylight. They showed how to set the hours and minutes via the 80's push button phone pad when Marty programmed it to go back 10 minutes early to warn Doc about the Libyans at the end of the movie. You may have figured that out at that point. I'm not that far in your reaction yet. :)
Out of all of the Back to the Future movies, this is the only one I still watch because 2015 is done now. (No, I would never forbid anybody to watch the sequels in any case because I don’t like to spoil other people’s fun. Besides, if it hadn’t been for the sequels, I wouldn’t have thought to turn a foreshadowed date into a party, so I won’t forget about the sequels either.)
They're all great. When I was a kid (yes I'm old), my rankings were 2 > 1 > 3. I think these days I would actually rank them in the opposite order. But as a trilogy they all fit together wonderfully.
10:31 _"What are you doing?"_ 😄 Let me just say a few things in George's defense. First, he's 17 years old. He's _swimming_ in hormones. And I promise you, _every_ 17-year-old, heterosexual male has found himself in school with young ladies he would _love_ to see in their underwear. Second, remember that you speak from the age of the _Internet._ This is one reason this part of the movie had to be based in 1955. By 2023, _millions_ of dollars have been spent, building the Internet and _filling_ it with pics and footage of young ladies in various stages of undress, so a 17-year-old male _today_ would _not_ be in the tree with a set of binoculars. He would be at _home,_ parked in front of his _computer._ But third, sure, it may be natural to take a dim view of George being a voyeur, but _I_ would like to know why the young lady in the window (I'm pretty sure it's Lorraine) is being an exhibitionist. Why does she have her _blinds_ open? Why is she doing whatever she's doing right in front of the _window?_ Might it be that there's some part of her that gets a thrill from exposing herself to the world?
The Libyan terrorists driving a voltswagon is actually very politically relevant, considering that many Arab states were militarily or politically aligned with the Nazis during World War II. Hence the VW bus. The Libyans had also been involved in direct conflict with American forces in the early 80s and were a common "generic terrorist" for US made 80s films. The 80s were a wild.
George and Lorraine are truely made for eachother. One is a Peeping Tom, the other is an obsessed stalker 😂😂
An obsessed stalker, that wants to do her son.
It's another one of those things that is all in the script, but you probably have to watch a few times to pick up. Lorraine's dad says *another* one of these kids jumped in front of his car, implying that it's not the first time it's happened - we then find out that Lorraine is deep in the "boy-crazy" phase of teenage life, and that implies she's not all that bothered about being seen - and some of the guys know it. Point is, teenagers do crazy things because of their raging hormones, and that was just as true in the '50s as it is now, despite their protestations otherwise!
@@joehoy9242 Yeah. Also: "I'm almost 18! It's not like I've never parked before."
@@joehoy9242 Right. "Another one of these kids..." The word is probably out that Lorraine undresses with her blinds up, and there's a convenient tree outside her window. She might be putting on regular shows - fully aware of what she's doing, yet still maintaining "plausible deniability".
Yeah, the characters started with flaws but ended up better versions of themselves. That's why the movie is taught in filmmaking schools, the script is close to perfect with the character development and all.
George started a cowardly insecure peeping Tom. His only motivation for dating Lorraine is Darth Vader's threat to melt his brain but it was his genuine care for Lorraine that made him face Biff. Even Marty transformed, at the end he's holding a package of his demo tape for the record companies, meaning he's more confident of his talents.
There's a term in cinema called "A Perfect Movie". Back to the Future is one of those movies. The reason is because of all the setup and payoff moments throughout; those little points of interest that seem mundane but later inform, compliment or overall affect the characters, plot and story, bringing everything full circle. A Perfect Movie.
I remember Quentin Tarantino mentioning this once in a interview
No movie is "perfect"
@@manvirshergill1739 they're not actually perfect there's just a term used in Hollywood for certain movies that beat a prerequisite basic criteria set fourth by Movie Makers and critics. the term itself is not to be taken literally
What other movies would you categorize as "perfect"?
@@omgbygollywow according to Tarantino he described the perfect movie as being something that can fit say formula, it may not be your cup of tea but it makes the criteria. Some movies which he mentioned would-be Jaws, The Exorcist, Annie Hall, and Young Frankenstein
About the Peeping Tom thing. The window shade was up while she was undressing. And after her father hits George he says “ANOTHER one of these kids jumped in front of my car. Which means she knows she is putting on a show for all the boys in town, and several have fallen out of the tree.
In the 1950s they didn’t have Internet porn they had in the tree porn.
Yes, there is evidence in the movie that Lorraine was an exhibitionist in her youth.
Yes! Definitely watch the rest of the trilogy! The time traveling gets a little more confusing.
I'm so hyped to watch the rest!!
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching when you watch the second movie, at the end it says "To Be Concluded..." You should probably hit stop because it starts showing scenes from part 3. You might not want spoilers.
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching don’t worry about that “to be concluded” - it’s fine.
The problem is when they made this movie it was not planned to be a huge hit. The producers looked at it as just another teen comedy with a couple of TV stars and hoped it would make a small profit for them. The ending with Doc coming back and yelling about their kids was truly meant as a joke.
"Yeah right. Like we're gonna make a sequel. Sure."
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching yes please do. Great reaction
Crispen Glover didn't like the end to this movie because he felt it was saying "money solves all of your problems," when: a) it wasn't the money, it was George developing confidence in himself and learning to like himself, and not letting people walk all over him, the money was a side effect, and b) money may not solve all problems, but if you grew up struggling for it, you know it makes a HUGE difference. I've literally seen reactors who know this and grew up this way, cry when they see that Marty gets the truck. It tells me that Crispen Glover has never had to struggle like this, and you don't realize how hard it is until you've had to do things like make the choice between eating and rent, or worse...
1:39 Michael J. Fox was 23 when he played the 17-year-old Marty McFly in this film. He turned 24 between the wrapping of filming and the film's initial release date.
When you watch the 2nd one turn the movie of after To Be Concluded comes up. The filmed part 3 at the same time and a trailer of sorts plays to hype up part 3. No spoilers before seeing it yourself
Ohhh thank you so much for telling me!!!
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching And stop the playback the INSTANT you see the "To Be Concluded." It jumps into spoilers REALLY fast, while the music is still playing.
"They found me. I don't know how, but they found me."
"Who, the hippies?"
😂
HAHahah
@@DeashasAlwaysWatching I never thought is was an odd choice until your comments. Now I'm wondering, "So, why would Libyan terrorists use a VW van? Was that the only thing that the airport Rent-A-Car had?"
@@KevinSchmitt77 this is a stretch, but it might be because many Arab organizations and countries were aligned with the Nazis during an after World War II.
Perhaps this is the brand of vehicle they're most familiar with ?
If the VW is the only vehicle jobless hippies can afford, then it's plausible terrorists too.
Remember he was only there for a week. It's unlikely they would remember enough details about him to make that connection decades later.
I love it when George stands up to his bully and gets the girl. For someone who awkward and outout of place in school who got bullied alot, I can relate
🎶 "That's The Power Of Love!" 🎶
Fun Fact: The judge who stands up to say that Marty (Michael J. Fox) is "just too darn loud" is Huey Lewis, whose songs "The Power Of Love" and "Back In Time" are featured in this movie.
Automobile Enthusiast Fact: Writers Bob Gale and Robert Zemeckis actually received a fan letter from John DeLorean after the film's release, thanking them for immortalizing his car.
Small Connection Fact: When Lorraine follows Marty (Michael J. Fox) back to Doc's house, she and Doc exchange an awkward greeting. This marks the only on-screen dialogue that Christopher Lloyd and Lea Thompson ever have, though they have appeared together in six movies.
Historical Fact: Apparently, Ronald Reagan was amused by Doc Brown's (Christopher Lloyd) disbelief that an actor like him could become President, so much so that he had the projectionist stop and replay the scene. He also seemed to enjoy it so much that he even made a direct reference of the film in his 1986 State of the Union address: "As they said in the film Back To The Future (1985), 'Where we're going, we don't need roads.'"
I wonder how many people would recognize the name of the various presidents if you went to a time 30 years before they were president. In the very early days the presidents had been prominent in the American Revolution, so they would probably be recognized. I think Donald Trump was famous 30 years earlier as a wealthy real estate developer. Biden was a fairly prominent Senator who had campaigned for president in 1987 (and had to withdraw because he'd lied about various parts of his background). If you went back to the late 70s and said George Bush was president in the late 00s, people might recognize the name and think you're talking about his father, who was the former head of the CIA. But I think that's about it. For most of American history, the reaction would be something along the lines of "Bill Clinton? Who the hell is that?"
Marty's band, The Pinheads, is also a cameo of Huey Lewis' band, The News.
Fell in love with your personality instantly. Subscribed here and joined your Patreon. People's opinions differ on the order of greatness, but the whole trilogy is a must-watch for everyone. Most iconic time travel movies of all time. Thank you!
GREAT reaction!!!😂👍👍👍👍👍 I wish you the BEST on hitting 10,000 subs!!!
Thank you so much :)
_"The adults in this world suck!"_
~ Deasha, circa 2023
okay i just subscribed ... thoroughly enjoyed your reaction ... keep making it fun to watch you and your channel is sure to compete with the best of them
Awee thank you :)
In regards to recognizing Marty ... I don't remember anyone that I only knew for a week in HS no matter what effect they had on me. But again it's a movie too about time travel so our minds need be a bit open 😉 great reaction as always hermosa ❤️
The idea that "Darth Vader" had a bigger impact on George (notice the front cover of his book) than this high school guy he knew for a blink of an eye makes sense. I'm more skeptical about if Lorraine would forget parking in a car and kissing a guy who reminds her of her brother. It's possible, though. My memories of high school aren't crystal clear as time and other subsequent important life events have dimmed or erased them.
There’s also a concept of contextual recognition, where you recognize someone based on your present context. Perhaps, since I have prosopagnosia, it is more obvious (since I have to rely on context more than faces to recognize people). Basically, because George and Lorraine would not expect their son to have been their strange friend 30 years earlier, they do not recognize him as such. Is the same concept of walking past a coworker when you’re visiting another place where you don’t expect him to be (I was once on an airplane with my boss (I saw him wearing a shirt with the company logo on it) but we didn’t recognize each other. I didn’t realize who it was until I was on the connecting flight.
As Doc says, people aren't thinking 4th dimensionally when they ask that question. What exactly would his parents do with the information of Marty looking like Calvin Klein? At what point would they even notice the similarity? Who's to say they didn't have a big fight 3 or 4 years prior because George was suspicious that Marty wasn't his? For some reason, everyone expects that when Marty travels back to the future, that somehow his parents will just suddenly notice the similarities. But the reality is that they would have noticed for quite some time, and I severely doubt their first thought would be "Calvin Klein was our son from the future!" And hell, even if that is where their minds went, I'm sure they would know better than to interfere with destiny. So they would pretend not to know, even if they did. Regardless, his parents noticing or not noticing would make no material difference in the way they would treat him in that scene.
It was also the simple fact that George and Lorraine grew up with Marty, and so saw his looks gradually change. They didn’t just suddenly run into this teenager who looked just like the teenager from 30 years before. So if the parents had thought about it, they would have long ago laughed it off. Or maybe George suspected Lorraine of looking “Calvin” up years later.
Watching the entire trilogy is worth it. They all follow the same premise to a degree: Doc and Marty time travel; They mess something up in the timeline; And the Delorean breaks down - it was never well built.
When you said “The adults in the world suck!” I was like Biff entrance stage right! Hahaha
Timing, she's got it!
The father says "Another one of these damn kids jumped in front of my car" ... which means George isn't the first kid to fall out of that tree while watching Lorraine change in front of an OPEN Window! I don't blame George for peeping ... he just accepted Lorraine's VERY Generous Open Window invitation.
I'm surprised that so few reactors comment about how "accident-prone" Lorraine's dad is.
Yeah. Lorraine knows she's putting on a show.
one of the greatest movies ever made! great reaction!!!!!!
I agree :) and thank you!
I never thought about a simple answer of Marty: "Sorry Lorraine, but I have a girlfriend". But it's Hollywood and we must extend the movie for other 20 minutes...
Love your reaction. Nice job on the ending prediction. You nailed it
Thank you!! 😁
Hello Deashas! Shout Out from the US Marine Corps! You are absolutely adorable! Found your channel not too long ago and can't wait to watch more movies with you! You are the first one that finally answered the two questions that I have always said about this movie how do they not recognize their future son as the Marty that helped them get together and on top of that lightning could strike any time in that one minute I don't want to nitpick but God finally somebody asked those two questions I've been asking since I was a little kid. I saw these movies in theaters when I was a kid my father would bring me. Is one of the most epic trilogies of all time like Star Wars 4, 5, and 6. Anyways
I dont think that George & Lorraine really thought much about the similiarity. They saw "Calvin" for a week in 1955 and then they never saw "Calvin" again. I don't think that in 1985, they thought about how their 17yo son looked like a guy they saw for a week 30 years ago. That's not how memory works.
Yeah, they saw their son develop slowly from a baby...it wouldn't occur to them at any point, "Hey, doesn't our son look like that guy we saw once?"
How come no one ever asks how Lorraine knows what kissing her brother feels like?
Fun fact: the guy who played the principal/teacher also played as Commander Tom “Strider” Jardian in the first Top Gun.
Literally is seen in the first 15 minutes where he tells Goose and Maverick “they’re going to “Top Gun”.
Subscribed! Turn off #2 when you see “To Be Concluded”, or you’ll watch a spoilery trailer for #3. And please keep in mind that the “future” for #2 is not the filmmakers making predictions of what life would be like, they were just trying to make an entertaining movie.
Ohhh thank you for letting me know :)
Robert Zemeckis direct this trilogy. The same man directed Cast Away & Forrest Gump.
I haven't seen cast away or forest Gump 😳
Please watch them both it's Incredible. Both Starring Tom Hanks.
Zemekis also directed Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Contact both are also great movies, Roger Rabbit is even better than great and it's amazing in how they did the effects!!! Also, there are Roger Rabbit Easter Eggs in Back to the Future, Part II.
12:09 "What age do you have to be to be in the middle of the street?"
It was the 1950's and this was a quiet, residential neighborhood. _Younger_ kids, around 8 to 12 years old, I think, would set up _games_ in the street. They were fairly _simple, straightforward_ games, and it was presumed that they would be able to get all the paraphernalia involved in the game out of the street whenever a _car_ came along.
You have to watch the whole trilogy. It’s mandatory. And besides that, it tells one giant, continuous story. 😊
Exactly part one is Marty's parents story... although originally the To Be Continued...thing was actually a joke due to that period of time in the 80's, they never actually were going to make any sequels...but, the demand was big enough so they did. I'm glad they did. 😊
3:09 Even in 1985 California where the movie takes place, it was illegal to have an open container in a car. Drinking beer while driving was a definite no-no. Biff had balls.
When I was a kid in the 1960s, kids still had homemade wooden go-karts. Marty "invents" the skateboard here by pulling the sides off the kid's go-kart. (I saw this movie in a movie theater when it first was released; in 1985 I turned 29 years old. This film truly is a classic and makes me miss the 1980s. (Having been born in 1956 I still vaguely rember the era of tail-fin cars, also.) By 1985 had seen Michael J. Fox in the TV sitcom "Family Ties" (in which he's a conservative Republican supporter of then-President Ronald Reagan and disagrees philosophically with his ex-hippie parents, with whom he lives along with his 2 sisters) and Christopher Lloyd in the sitcom "Taxi" (in which he's one of the cast of several taxi drivers; who's an eccentric, much like Doc.) Both shows are probably represented on RUclips, in case you're interested in seeing these actors' career histories. Family Ties is still in cable-TV reruns.
Fox was 21 or 22, when he did this; he was close enough to teenage years. That, and his height, made him look quite young.
It's "gigawatts," but the writers weren't science-savvy, so they went to a seminar, and the German scientist pronounced it "jigawatts," so they believed that's how it's *always* pronounced, so they wrote it that way. It's the gif/jif argument, but from the 1980s.
17:27: Unfortunately, I’ve had a similar experience with manure lol.
Oh nooooo
Trivia regarding Marty’s parents, not recognizing him: There is a stripped it, but I’m shot scene where George his father looks at an old picture from the dance, and then looks at Marty and realizes what happened.
Yes
:)
21:43 People always ask this, but why would they remember this random person they knew for a single week (less) _30 years ago?_
23:31 in 1955, you couldn’t buy saucy pictures if you were under 21. Films existed, but you generally had to go to a theater, and again, they would card you. George was only 17, so he had to content himself with the live-action stuff.
That "teacher" is also the captain of the aircraft carrier in the original top gun. And many 8thers.
MJF was 24 when he made Back to the Future, while also filming Family Ties full time.
Most of us familiar with this trilogy were answering every question as we watched. It's nice to see you liked.
The Back to the Future trilogy is like just one complete story to me. I can't see only watching one movie without the others, it is like only watching the first act of a movie then leaving. I recommend watching the complete trilogy!
All 3 movies are great, people all have their favorite and debate which one is best, but almost everyone agrees all 3 movies are good or great.
It's like only watching "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring". The story continues in the next two movies so if you only watch the first one you miss out on the way the story is supposed to be enjoyed.
Yes, you must watch the other 2
I will be :)
"I'm definitely getting a sandwich and milkshake first!" I love a woman with her priorities straight 👍
If I was pointing at you I wouldn't say a movie title . . . unless it was "Drop Dead Gorgeous" or "The Woman In Black" 😜
The joke about Jack Benny being the Secretary of the Treasury was actually very good. Jack Benny’s meme was that he was the cheapest man in Hollywood.
One sketch had him dictating a letter to the Diamond Almond Company about how dissatisfied he was with their product-while he was eating the almonds he was “complaining” about-so they would send him a free can (to be fair, almonds were expensive back then). When he got done, he asked his secretary if she needed the address, and she said, “I’ll just send it to the same place I sent all the other letters.”
They had to put prosthetics on Lea Thompson and Crispin Glover in order for them to play Marty’s parents because they are the same age as Michael J Fox
The question of, "Where was Einstein during that minute?" is a somewhat complex question, but it boils down to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (the physicist, not the dog). That is, the answer to your question depends on your frame of reference.
From Einstein's frame of reference, there was no "somewhere else;" he traveled instantly from 1:20 AM to 1:21 AM. However, what has actually happened is that the Flux Capacitor has "stopped time" for the DeLorean and it's occupants. In effect, Einstein is suspended in time until 1:21 AM; it's sort of like when you're unconscious - you have no sense of lost time; the time you're unconscious seems to pass instantaneously.
From Doc & Marty's frame of reference, the DeLorean vanishes because for the 1 minute, it exists outside of spacetime. It reappears at 1:21 AM when the Flux Capacitor reinstates it in spacetime. In other words, from their frame of reference, the DeLorean _doesn't exist_ for one minute.
This is why the DeLorean is iced over upon it's return; any moisture on the surface would freeze instantly because there's no heat or energy outside of spacetime.
Regarding Lorraine and George recognizing their son as "Calvin Klein":
The answer is "no." Many people reacting to this film ask this question. Try to remember that you and I (the viewers) are skipping over 30 years' worth of events. For Lorraine and George, "Calvin" was some kid who showed up for 1 week while they were in high school, helped them out a bit, then disappeared out of their lives. Lorraine and George graduated, went to college, got married, had kids, got jobs, etc, etc...they would've forgotten the details of that week over those 30 years.
Secondly, if you were to ask Lorraine or George in 1985, they would insist there is no similarity between their son Marty and Calvin because no matter your age, your parents always see you as they way you looked when you were a child. So Lorraine and George would see Marty as a child, while they'd see Calvin as a peer.
he peeped and she was a stalker when she liked a boy. i'd say they even themselves out to make a perfect match
As someone growing up in the '50's, they really nailed EVERY nuance on how things were different back then. (Of course, the movie was made by people who also dated back.) They captured details about life back then which had gradually changed over the years, so gradual, living through them made one forget how it was.
On the other hand, while the plot line of the sequels were also excellent, their idea of life 30 years later, i.e., 2015, is really way off. We never got flying cars and the concept of the internet was not even being considered, at least in terms of its effects on everything.
I mean, for Part II, that _is_ the point. They've talked about how other depictions of the future never get it right, and almost immediately become dated; and decided to intentionally lean into it.
😎👍 Michael J. Fox and Lea Thompson (who played his mother) were both 24 when this film was made. Using actors in their mid 20s to play teenagers was extremely common throughout the 20th century. That and the fact that (as you pointed out) George and Lorraine's son grew up to be their old friend Marty are among many things one simply has to overlook to enjoy this series. Like the fact that time machine goes from only being able to run on plutonium to being able to run on garbage within a very short timespan. In the 3rd entry of the series, the whole topography of the town they live in completely changes, and suddenly, it's in the middle of a desert.😵💫
This movie ages amazingly well.
Yes, it’s worth watching all three sequels.
Im going to :)
Believe it or not, there was no sequel planned. The movie was such a huge hit they decided to make 2 more. One of the best trilogies ever, along with Indiana Jones and Star Wars.
The original ending was originally intended to be just a joke. When they made the film they had no idea just how successful it was going to become, never mind that it became one of the most beloved films of all time. Its success is what ultimately led to the two sequels (which were filmed back-to-back).
Personally I find _Back to the Future Part II_ (1989) to be the weakest of the trilogy - not that it is bad (far from it); to me it is just not *as* good as the other two and it can be a bit confusing, although there is still plenty to enjoy about it and technically it is very impressive considering the time that it came out. _Back to the Future Part III_ (1990), while not *quite* up to the standards of the first film, is still very good indeed.
In February 2020 there was the global premiere of _Back to the Future: The Musical,_ the stage musical adaptation of the first film, in Manchester, here in the UK. I went to see it at the Adelphi Theatre in London in June of last year and I am really glad I did because it is a great way to retell a familiar story with a different medium. I treated my mum to it last month by paying for her ticket and she enjoyed it so much that she wants to see it again and treat one of her friends to the entry ticket for it later on this year. She thought that the DeLorean absolutely stole the show and it was so clever the way they made the car look like it was travelling along long roads (making great use of the turntable on the stage).
The two people who adapted the film for the stage were none other than the two Bobs who wrote the original film: Robert Zemeckis (who, as you noticed, was also the director of the original film) and Bob Gale. Alan Silvestri not only allowed the use of music he had already composed for the film, but also he came back on board to help write some new songs unique to the stage adaptation (although the stage version does still contain the songs _The Power of Love, Back in Time, Earth Angel_ and _Johnny B. Goode_ - they had a licence to include all four of those as well).
Admittedly some changes had to be made in order for it to work on the stage (for instance, Doc no longer has a dog, and instead of Libyan terrorists murdering Doc he gets poisoned by the plutonium he loads into the car. These two changes are no surprise because a dog would have been frightened by the lights and sound effects, especially the loud bangs and vibrant flashes when the car time-travels. Also, removing the Libyans meant that they didn't have to worry about having to deal with two vehicles on stage; it was probably enough of a challenge with just the one!). However, for the eagle-eyed viewers the stage adaptation is littered with several Easter Eggs, some of which reference the films.
Just came across your channel and subscribed. Loved your reaction, and you seemed to pick up on things that a lot of other reactors really didn't which is nice. I also just love your vibe as a person.
As most people mentioned, when talking about the "perfect movie" this is one of the candidates. So much so that this is pretty much a staple in film school and is talked about in one way or another. To add a couple of things, it's also worth sharing that when you watch BTTF 2 you should be prepared for an actress change in who's playing Jennifer. Claudia Wells mother was diagnosed with cancer and she stepped away. In the second film it's Elisabeth Shue, who you would definitely recognize as Stillwell from The Boys. There was no plans for a sequel when they made BTTF, and so on top of having to recast an actress, they had to refilm the ending to the first film. Robert Zemeckis(director) said that if he'd known there would be a sequel, he wouldn't have involved Jennifer at all. There's a whole bunch of trivia involved with this movie like Michael J. Fox being the second actor to play Marty, or why Crispin Glover (Marty's dad, George) isn't in the sequels, or what Michael J. Fox's schedule looked like filming this movie.
You asked about watching a breakdown video, and honestly I'm not sure. You did pick up on some stuff I don't think some really did. On the other hand, there are a ton of setups and payoffs in this movie and different details between the past/future that you may have missed. There also might be tidbits like the Marty replacement discussed. It could possibly be a thing you watch and record and then decide on your own if you feel as if you learned a lot?
I don't know, I'm not a streamer.
The clock strike is glossed over, but its plausible that Hill Valley historians determined it was struck exactly at the stroke of 10:04 based on how the inner workings of the clock were stopped at. That info would've been passed on through the legend and made it into the pamphlet that the lady gave Marty, thats why Doc reads "At precisely..."
Lorraine: You know what I do in that situation?
Deashas: Put your clothes back on?
I'm dead! 😂😂😂😂😂❤
"How many times in 60 seconds can lightning strike? Don't they have to get it precise?"
I mean the general answer is "It's a movie, try not to think about it too much" but my headcannon is that Doc built some kind of capacitor or similar to hold the charge for a minute.
Loved your reaction!
I think you mean head canon, although I find the idea of a head-mounted cannon amusing. And they were told that the lightning struck precisely at 10:04 PM, not "around 10:04" and not "between 10:04 and 10:05."
This was such a well worked out story. Thanks for your great reaction.
Glad you enjoyed it
This is one of the best trilogies in film history.
a really great reaction video, i enjoyed it. Thank U :)
thank you happy you enjoyed it
26:49 When you're the _protagonist_ in an _action_ flick, you've got to have the most _incredibly_ strong arms.
Never stop enjoying seeing people reacting to Loraine hitting on her son, or the moment they realise the importance of the clock tower and the bolt of lightning.
I liked your insight and reactions
Some Back to the Future Easter Eggs: In one of Back to the Future's most celebrated Easter eggs, Twin Pines Shopping Center (truly Puente Slopes Shopping Center in Industry, California) gets to be Solitary Pine Shopping Center after the film, calling back to the minute that Marty crashed down one of Farmer Peabody's pines with the DeLorean in 1955. Whereas the destiny of Back to the Future's Libyans is vague within the film, Doc's to begin with the occasion of getting shot by them gives watchers a small foretelling. Take note that Doc's bullet holes aren't dying. Perhaps typically chalked up to the PG rating, but still, getting shot close-range by a machine weapon would create something. Either way, in conclusion, it's uncovered that Doc wore a bulletproof vest. Is he wearing the bulletproof vest here, or is this not the correct timeline? Let's take off that to the time travel specialists.Doc Brown's house at 1640 Riverside Drive is actually a popular property in Pasadena, California. This is the "Gamble House", once owned by David and Mary Gamble of the famous "Proctor and Gamble." The house's interior is actually that of Robert R. Blacker, as filming inside the Gamble house is prohibited.
"They found me..." The hippies? LOL
Other times one of them or both reprised the roll and documentaries on the films
Back to the Future: Doc Brown Saves the World
Donald Trump's The Art of the Deal: The Movie
A Million Ways to Die in the West
Huey Lewis and the News: The Power of Love
The 1990 Earth Day Special (only found on youtube never saved to DVD)
Expedition: Back to the Future (TV Mini Series 2021)
HUVr: BELIEF with Christopher Lloyd and Tony Hawk
The Making of the Back to the Future 2
The Making of the Back to the Future Trilogy Documentary
the movies that made us back to the future
Minty Comedic Arts 10 Things You Didn't Know About Back ToThe Future
Marty McFly & Doc Brown Visit Jimmy Kimmel Live
October 21, 2015: Celebrate 'Back to the Future' Day
The Future Is Now! - A Special Message From Doc Brown
Back To The Future Celebration : Inside Doc Brown's Mansion / Gamble House
Myth & Mogul: John DeLorean
off topic I would also love a reaction to From Star Wars to Jedi The Making of a Saga
I loved your reaction, thank you!!!! I needed it after one of the worst nights of my lonesome and miserable life... Have an excellent day and I'm saaaacribing😊😊😊
Hey I'm really happy that I could brighten your night. Lonesomeness sucks and happens to alot of us, I also watch some of my favorite youtubers when I'm feeling alone
the actor that plays Biff is the nicest guy in real life. he does stand up comedy
I saw this movie in a double feature at the drive in on cape cod with Teen Wolf (also with Michael J Fox) when I was 6. Alot of fun.
1. Cranky principal Strickland/James Tolkan also played the ship's squadron leader in "Top Gun".
2. The teacher that tells Marty, "I'm afraid you're just too darn loud" is Huey Lewis himself. (Heart of rock and roll)
3. Eric Stoltz was first cast as Marty, but he didn't play well with others and was fired. Some of his long shots are still in the movie.
4. The flammable material set on fire with the model exercise had to have been put there on purpose.
5. It's always fun to see how people react to the Marty and his mom car scene. 🤣
6. George McFly/Crispin Glover didn't like that the story ended with the family being prosperous.
7. IMVHO part II is the best of the trifecta.
8. If you want a first time/share of an OUTSTANDING movie where Christopher Lloyd plays the heavy you must do "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".
michael j fox was actually only 24 when he made this movie...funny thing is that the actors who played his parents were 3 years younger than he was
"he was not bird watching...he was boob watching!". 🤣😂🤣😂
My favourite movie
18:16 "I guess. But they gave you a _time;_ an hour and a minute. In 60 seconds, how many times could lightning strike?"
😳 Oh. You know, I've picked apart a _lot_ of technical details with this movie to find mistakes, and seen plenty of reactions from _other_ people, doing the same. You're the first one to spot that particular _one,_ though.
And that's a good point. The clock has been stopped at 10:04, but how precise is that? You're right. 60 seconds is quite a long span of _time,_ especially from the perspective of a _lightning_ strike.
Michael J. Fox was 23 when he played Marty McFly in this movie.
I was interested in this video because it's on one of my favorite movies of all time, but the Pride merch in the background convinced me to sub immediately. Hell yeah.
Great Scott, I love your reactions!!! (They're not heavy)
Cute eye makeup, BTW 😍
Glad you like them!
The thing is... Doc DIDN'T know about him getting shot in the beginning segment of the film because Marty going into the past hadn't happened yet. So yes, Doc died in 1985. When Marty travels back in time, things haven't happened yet for him and the surrounding events of wherever he is unless he's already been there. It's confusing,... I know.
24:03 I think it's more that teenagers do lots of creepy stuff, and you can't really hold it against them 30 years later. George was a creepy peeping tom, but he's a nice guy now.
Also, part of the reason he was spying on Lorraine is he didn't have the confidence to actually approach her or any other girl. That changed in this movie.
Instantly subscribed. Please do the rest of the trilogy ❤
This movie had such high hopes for us for 2015. :D
Everything did. As a 70-year-old man, I am so disheartened.
Michael J Fox was indeed in his 20's when he filmed this movie.
Yeah, you indeed "literally knew everything" about Marty's letter and Doc wearing a bulletproof vest :)
I don’t think there were skateboards in the 1950s. Marty ripping the kid’s cart in two would have demonstrated a new toy.
We did have the idea of separating the two halves of clamp-on roller skates and nailing them to a board, though.
We still have Toy'R'Us here in Canada so next time you visit and want some nostalgia check if where you're going has one.
8:49 Marty left 1985 on October 26th at 01:35am. Doc set the time machine for 6am on 11/12/55 which is why Marty wound up in the early morning daylight. They showed how to set the hours and minutes via the 80's push button phone pad when Marty programmed it to go back 10 minutes early to warn Doc about the Libyans at the end of the movie. You may have figured that out at that point. I'm not that far in your reaction yet. :)
BTTF is the first film appearance of Billy Zane as Biff's crony Match.
Michael J Fox was around 23-24 when he made this movie.
I love this movie - and I love to study how people react! Thanks for your performance! You got an A
Out of all of the Back to the Future movies, this is the only one I still watch because 2015 is done now. (No, I would never forbid anybody to watch the sequels in any case because I don’t like to spoil other people’s fun. Besides, if it hadn’t been for the sequels, I wouldn’t have thought to turn a foreshadowed date into a party, so I won’t forget about the sequels either.)
7:45: "They found me!, i don't know how, but they found me!" "the Hippies?!" 🤔 😂 great reaction to a classic! i subbed for more!
20:40 i have watched many reactions for this movie and you are the first that notice that, yes he is and he is a very good actor on my opinion.
Marty McFly was only 23 when they were filming
They're all great. When I was a kid (yes I'm old), my rankings were 2 > 1 > 3. I think these days I would actually rank them in the opposite order. But as a trilogy they all fit together wonderfully.
Great reaction 🔥😁😁😁🔥
Thank you
He definitely wasn't a teenager playing a teenager in this movie but he was only 23 during filming. Not quite in his 30s like you mentioned. Lol
Definitely watch the sequels
10:31 _"What are you doing?"_
😄 Let me just say a few things in George's defense. First, he's 17 years old. He's _swimming_ in hormones. And I promise you, _every_ 17-year-old, heterosexual male has found himself in school with young ladies he would _love_ to see in their underwear.
Second, remember that you speak from the age of the _Internet._ This is one reason this part of the movie had to be based in 1955. By 2023, _millions_ of dollars have been spent, building the Internet and _filling_ it with pics and footage of young ladies in various stages of undress, so a 17-year-old male _today_ would _not_ be in the tree with a set of binoculars. He would be at _home,_ parked in front of his _computer._
But third, sure, it may be natural to take a dim view of George being a voyeur, but _I_ would like to know why the young lady in the window (I'm pretty sure it's Lorraine) is being an exhibitionist. Why does she have her _blinds_ open? Why is she doing whatever she's doing right in front of the _window?_ Might it be that there's some part of her that gets a thrill from exposing herself to the world?
2nd one is even better! 3rd one is good, too. Altogether, one of the best trilogies.
The Libyan terrorists driving a voltswagon is actually very politically relevant, considering that many Arab states were militarily or politically aligned with the Nazis during World War II.
Hence the VW bus.
The Libyans had also been involved in direct conflict with American forces in the early 80s and were a common "generic terrorist" for US made 80s films.
The 80s were a wild.