@@sahidsk1013 looser how ? haar kar bhi vo amar ho gayee.... Aaj kam se kam hame apne fundamental rights ke baare me pata hai...vaise mujhe pata hai tum katue ho...aur Jaan boojh kar tumne unhe looser kaha hai
I Request you to Please make Shorts on these Cases:- 1) Sajjan Singh Case (1965) 2) Golaknath Case 3) Minerva Mills Case 4) Menka Gandhi Case 5) Indira Swahney Case 6) AK Gopalan Case 7) PA Inamdar Case 8) D.C.Wadhwa Case 9) Shankari Prasad Case(1951)
@@Qtiku84bjp ka full support tha waqf ke time sirf Congress ki galti nhi hai purane session dekho parliament ke ab aankhein khul rhi hai tou achi baat hai bs.
@@-PiyushJiwaqt me transparency to laa sakte hai which is donated and which is encroached? Currently koi challenge hi nhi kar sakta. Congress to iske bhi khilaaf hai
@@RojaJanemanDon’t be fool and completely unpad. The land reforms which the first Kerala government enunciated was the major revolutionary law that changed Kerala forever. Before that most of the land in Kerala belonged to temples or Brahmin households. This law, written by a communist government headed by Brahmin-by-birth communist leader redistributed land to people who till the land. This is the start of divergence of Kerala from rest of India ( the other law passed by this government was the education bill- go and learn about it).
So the government can take the lands related to places if worship of a specific community according to thier convenience. But can't take from others. Thanks for such unbiased and ethical decision of the court of law.
Exactly!!!! That too WAQF board gives muslim people acquire any Govt/nongovt property, I mean seriously???? And on the other hand they take away land legally bought and owned by a person🤷🏽♀️.....Clearly shows the propaganda of Congress! And then they cry about Religion politics
I had purchased your clat ll.b mentor book on 3 September for my preparation of clat and i must say that book is not very conjusted very simple language with perfect example and very common questions of clat aspirants have . A very well explained and best book for clat preparation thank you so much priya mam ❤❤❤❤❤
@@rajasimantain this exact case which she is talking if not been deciphered by supreme court quickly then Indira Gandhi was some steps away from dictatorship
The top court in 2011 had recognised passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug case by which it had permitted withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients not in a position to make an informed decision. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug was a nurse in the King Edwards Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. Please make on this topic video ❤
Read the basic structure doctrine of the COI. And cases related to it from golak nath(1951 🤔 )to Keshav nanda Bharti(1973). And go little further to read minerva mills case (1980) where CJI YV chandrachud explained how “everything in India is under judicial review” and this include almost every executive action( some exception are there to this). I’m not a law student but still I think judiciary can and have gone against the govt in the past especially when the govt was doing something against the spirit of the constitution. ; read about 1970s where it was executive vs judiciary at its peak.
@@saumyapandey2372 mostly in cases where they see executive non compliance or legislative vaccum they do end up prescribing guidelines such as Vishakha guidelines. Other than that everything is under check and balances with separation of functions intact.
Ma'am Jitne bhi articles jo important hain upsc ke liye uska series laaye please...ek short ek article share with important notes also so that students can quickly revise all the important articles!!
I am currently studying law and about to give my 1st attempt (hopefully my only attempt) of CLAT2025 ,and one day I was reading an article in which author wrote -: "ASKING QUESTIONS WHICH YOU CANT ANSWER IS BETTER THAN ANSWER WHICH YOU CANNOT QUESTION" I don't know why I thought of this ....Its a very good quote tbh😅
Before keshvanand case, there was a case golaknath vs state of punjab-1967. Sc said, article 368 has more authority than article 13,so parliament can change the fundamental right.
Fact- Kesvanandi bharti lost the case but will remember forever 😮
Thankyou
Most popular looser in judicial history of india😂
@@sahidsk1013 looser how ?
haar kar bhi vo amar ho gayee....
Aaj kam se kam hame apne fundamental rights ke baare me pata hai...vaise mujhe pata hai tum katue ho...aur Jaan boojh kar tumne unhe looser kaha hai
@@sahidsk1013soon waqf will lose all its property 😂😂😂
@@Aryan-jp6nh None of the properties are their's they are a legal theif
Keshav Anand bharti case still in law syllabus book!
I Request you to Please make Shorts on these Cases:-
1) Sajjan Singh Case (1965)
2) Golaknath Case
3) Minerva Mills Case
4) Menka Gandhi Case
5) Indira Swahney Case
6) AK Gopalan Case
7) PA Inamdar Case
8) D.C.Wadhwa Case
9) Shankari Prasad Case(1951)
Paschim banga khet mazdoor samity vs State of west bengal
D K Basu
Indira sahani
There is a very nice video of Sanyog Vyas where he explains golaknath case
Tandoor murder case
""Khuch is kadar tumse harnge ki tum jeet kar bhi ro padoge" "- aaj ye line bhout sahi lag rahi hai yaha per
wah kitna khoobsurat line hai. Kaha se hai yeh line?
For Waqf these Govt will give land and money totally, but can grab any land of majority of the nation. What a great Constitution we have.
Yes, it should only grab minority land.
Chacha Nehru ne banaya tha Waqf board.......toh aj ki government wafq board ko ban bhi kr skti hai.........😮..........
@@Qtiku84bjp ka full support tha waqf ke time sirf Congress ki galti nhi hai purane session dekho parliament ke ab aankhein khul rhi hai tou achi baat hai bs.
That's what happens when you have pseudo secularism like in India.
@@-PiyushJiwaqt me transparency to laa sakte hai which is donated and which is encroached? Currently koi challenge hi nhi kar sakta. Congress to iske bhi khilaaf hai
Keshwanand bharti ji says to indian government -- तुम्हारी जीत से ज्यादा हमारी हार के चर्चे होंगे, कुछ इस तरह तुम से हारेंगे हम 😅
Abe 😂😂
Same congress to bjp in this election 👽
😂😂@@shehzar_hn2680
😂😂😂
@@shehzar_hn2680 haha😂😂
I use to Prep for UPSC and studied law for the same. Apne bilkul sahi kaha koi bhi neend main bata dega.. Ye naam sunte he poora case yaad agya...!!
*Kesavananda Bharati ji will be remembered forever🧡His case gave full clarity over our fundamental rights. Om Shanti🙏🕉️*
@@RojaJanemanVery True😭😭💯 Thank you for showing new perspective and reality
Hindus need to realise this and wake up atleast now😭🕉️🚩
@@RojaJanemanDon’t be fool and completely unpad. The land reforms which the first Kerala government enunciated was the major revolutionary law that changed Kerala forever. Before that most of the land in Kerala belonged to temples or Brahmin households. This law, written by a communist government headed by Brahmin-by-birth communist leader redistributed land to people who till the land. This is the start of divergence of Kerala from rest of India ( the other law passed by this government was the education bill- go and learn about it).
@@abcxyz1881 and now most of the land is acquired by mosque and church now people are happy there 😅
@@varundhakad4648 That’s what your unpad mind thinks. I don’t think you have the background stuff in your mind to engage in any kind of debate.
Koi argument nhi ho toh gawaaro ki tarah dusre ko khud ki tarah unpad bol Dene ka he na@@abcxyz1881
So the government can take the lands related to places if worship of a specific community according to thier convenience. But can't take from others. Thanks for such unbiased and ethical decision of the court of law.
I was really waiting for such comment 😂
I was waiting for such comment 😂
A Big acknowledgement to Priya Mam
For making a subject interesting ❤
Keshawanad bharti case was concluded just because of the legend Nani Palkhivala🙏🏻🙏🏻
Next case :Indira Swahney case ,
Minerva Mills case.
Please ma'am
Bilkul mama
Go and read it yourself 😂
i was about to say
Cannot understand how fundamental right was protected and guaranteed whilst the complainant lost the case
I have the same doubt
The government had the rights to acquire the land of Kesavananda Bharti ji but can't acquire land from the Waqf Board ?
Exactly!!!! That too WAQF board gives muslim people acquire any Govt/nongovt property, I mean seriously???? And on the other hand they take away land legally bought and owned by a person🤷🏽♀️.....Clearly shows the propaganda of Congress! And then they cry about Religion politics
Yes, because 😂 India is a secular democratic republic, do you understand what that means?
@@sumarianprinceain't that statement contradicting what the Indian state did with bharti?
@@sumarianprinceit means anti Hindu.
@@shravyaamin8346 It's Congress, so should be obvious.
HIGHLY EXCELLANT SKILL OF TEACHING AND PRESENTAION SKILL AT SUPER HIGH LEVEL GOD GIFFTED INTELLECT.
I had purchased your clat ll.b mentor book on 3 September for my preparation of clat
and i must say that book is not very conjusted
very simple language with perfect example and very common questions of clat aspirants have .
A very well explained and best book for clat preparation
thank you so much priya mam ❤❤❤❤❤
Indian justice system then : 💩
Indian justice system now : 💩
That one binary guy who don't know about law
You are able to post this because of judicial system otherwise india would have been a dictatorship a long ago
@@MyAman222 India is HINDU Majority country. That’s the only reason it’s Democracy, NOT BECAUSE OF JUDICIARY.
@@MyAman222then who will be dictator?
@@rajasimantain this exact case which she is talking if not been deciphered by supreme court quickly then Indira Gandhi was some steps away from dictatorship
Salute to uuuuuu jo aap 1 min mein itnaaa saara information summarise karke audience tak pahunchati hai...
हारकर जीतने वाले को केशवानंद भारती कहते है 😊😊
Kerala govt masjid aur church ke property keliye Aisa kuch nahi karega..!!
Na baba na 😂 that would be against our secularist principles.
True 💯💯💯
Par centre me to modi hai phur bhj kon sa mar diya
Ha bhai educated log ka logic hai ye apne samjh mai kaha 😢
@@rohankashyap4016 Modi namard hai, Yogiji ko lana hoga
Finally someone explained the case in a simple way 👏 Thank You
Hi Priya Ma'am, please explain S.R. Bommai V/S Union of India.
And a big thank you for making law so easy to understand! ❤
It's a really important and useful case.thank you ❤
Respect for Kesavananda Bhartiya Ji 🙌
Our Saints are our true heritage 🙏🙏
Oo God! Today only I was searching for this😅 thankyou.... Kisi cheej ko shiddat se dhundho to mil hi jati hai... Bahut acche se samjhaya😅😅❤
Ayodhya verdict second most top case
You must be a law student ,
Isko AI bolte hai
Watch vikas Divyakirti sir in detail case study on keshavanand bharati
Usko google algorithm kahta hain
Kesvanandi bharti❤
Bahot acche se samaz aaya😊😊😊
Oh god. How energetic this girl is. Really incredible
I just watch to hear the way she saya.."Batana zara"😊
Minerva mills case also known as fundamental rights case.
Mainly known as Harmonious Construction doctrine
@@SA-zl8gnas far as I know this is not a case of harmonious construction. It just maintained a balance between FR and DPSP
You look a very strict-knowledgeable teacher, but a forgiving person, and a hard-working and progressive youtuber.
You really urging to change it. 😅
Your videos are too informative
Finally some good content, thank you ❤
The top court in 2011 had recognised passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug case by which it had permitted withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients not in a position to make an informed decision. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug was a nurse in the King Edwards Memorial Hospital in Mumbai.
Please make on this topic video ❤
Awesome Just want to say in your case maturity is more than age.god bless you
The Supreme Court of India never went against any government.
Sorry, but don't show-case your poor knowledge
Read the basic structure doctrine of the COI. And cases related to it from golak nath(1951 🤔 )to Keshav nanda Bharti(1973). And go little further to read minerva mills case (1980) where CJI YV chandrachud explained how “everything in India is under judicial review” and this include almost every executive action( some exception are there to this).
I’m not a law student but still I think judiciary can and have gone against the govt in the past especially when the govt was doing something against the spirit of the constitution. ; read about 1970s where it was executive vs judiciary at its peak.
@@truewords6054 and we are seeing judiciary acting like executives 😂😂
@@saumyapandey2372 mostly in cases where they see executive non compliance or legislative vaccum they do end up prescribing guidelines such as Vishakha guidelines. Other than that everything is under check and balances with separation of functions intact.
Ma'am
Jitne bhi articles jo important hain upsc ke liye uska series laaye please...ek short ek article share with important notes also so that students can quickly revise all the important articles!!
Now her name is Immortal 😇
जय श्री राम हनुमान💙 🦚💖💖💖💖💖🦚👏🚩🦚🛐🦚🦚🙏🙏❤️❤️🚩❤🌸🙏❤❤
Golaknath Case
Indra Swaney Case
Puttuswamy Case
Yes, Puttuswamy case
Best teacher 🙌
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum ,1985.
I have this novel too.. totally worth it to read
Ayodhya verdict is second top most case
Very well- explanation, thank u very much 🙏🙏🙏
Indra Nehru Gandhi vs Ram Narain ...1975
Raj Narain
Vafq bord vale case me abhi kaha pahucha he
Thanks to those 7 judges.
Didi, law hi nhi UPSC student bhi neend me bhi bta dega.
Humein toh aapki aankhon ka jaadu samajhna hai ma'am😍
HER WAY 0F EXPLAINATI0N IS S0 G00D 🎉
Meanwhile WAQF board.......
हम भी मूल ढांचे को अवधारणा पड़ रहे हैं ❤
Balfour vs balfour
Balfour vs Balfour easy h
Amazing explanation way😊
Love you ma'am ❤
Please continue as the same😊❤
Pls discuss "Indira sawhney case".
I'm not into law but i could listen you for hours
Kesavananda Bharti Saiys, तुम जीत कर भी रो दोगे, इस कदर तुमसे हारेंगे हम।
Thank you so much ma'am itni usefull information or itna acha content ke liye
Your video is very informative 🙂💗
Very nice series 👏🏽
i have read this case when i study political science in college
the case we need ❤
Mam that was a very good explanation... You are the goddess for all the new law students ! Kindly do a video on Right to privacy case mam.
1)AK Gopalan case of 1950
2) Maneka Gandhi case of 1978
samjhaiye 🙏
I am currently studying law and about to give my 1st attempt (hopefully my only attempt) of CLAT2025 ,and one day I was reading an article in which author wrote -:
"ASKING QUESTIONS WHICH YOU CANT ANSWER IS BETTER THAN ANSWER WHICH YOU CANNOT QUESTION"
I don't know why I thought of this ....Its a very good quote tbh😅
Share how women get the equality and education power in India,I hope that you'll make one video on this .
Fit hone le chakkar mein cuteness gawaa di..❤❤
Thank you for this video.
Directive principle of state policy
Kuch dino mera exam hai ye mere syllabus mein hai mujhe bohot help mili samajh ne mai 🙏
Next case : Durgapada Ghosh vs West Bengal gvt. Please please please please 🙏
Also helpful for UPSC aspirants.
TMA PAI Vs Union of india next case pls
Keshvanand bharti ne to first person the jinhone kha tha ki,preamble is the part of the indian constitution 😊
I am pursuing mbbs but i watch ur all videos 😅
Golaknath vs. state of Punjab
Thanks for making such a content. Please keep going because it's really very helpful for us.
Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar (2014), every Indian men should know about this case. Hope you will cover this one.
Teach us all constitution article by article like this type of explanation please ma'am 🙏🙏
Very unique content ❤❤❤😊😊
haare to kya hua
CHANGE to leke aaye india me 💥
5 judges cases👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓👨🎓
Right to Freedom
Thank you mem ❤
Aaj bhi kitne gareebo k zameen aur khet ameer log, businessman log dara dhamka k loot lete hain.
Rights and justice is only for rich.
Me *watching her face expressions❤ instead of listening her discussion 😅
Kuch log haar ke bhi change la sakte hai 🫡
Before keshvanand case, there was a case golaknath vs state of punjab-1967.
Sc said, article 368 has more authority than article 13,so parliament can change the fundamental right.
Bibliography is social reformer element.
I study about these case in class 11 Political science in ch 2
Who else like
As a CA student I know these cases:-
Chanaya vs Rammaya
Royal British Bank vs Turquand
Ashburry Railways vs Richie...and much more
You are so cute i m a jee aspirant but still i m watching ur videos and i liked that❤❤❤❤❤
Mam can you please explain what is happening in the Momita Debnath case at the supreme court
I can never forget a case like this and true I can tell about this case literally in my sleep 🤣🤣
Please discuss all important cases for upsc thanks for making such videos ❤
living legend
“The case that saved democracy” is KNB case of 1973.
“Everything in India is under judicial review” comes from Minerva Mills case of 1980.